Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 145 references

Gaussian Processes in Power Systems: Techniques, Applications, and Future Works

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A structured survey positions Gaussian processes as a unifying tool for uncertainty-aware power-grid analytics.

desk verdict Useful but overclaimed survey: solid taxonomy, shaky 'first comprehensive' assertion, and a reference list that needs cleaning. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.15950 v2 pith:DK5A5VCF submitted 2025-05-21 eess.SY cs.SY

Bendong Tan , Tong Su , Yu Weng , Ketian Ye , Parikshit Pareek , Petr Vorobev , Hung Nguyen , Junbo Zhao
show 1 more author
Deepjyoti Deka
This is my paper
classification eess.SYcs.SY
keywords Gaussianprocesspowergridsprobabilisticmachinelearningrenewableenergyforecastingriskassessmentoptimalflowsurvey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to be the first comprehensive survey of Gaussian process (GP) methods in power systems, organizing the field into three application domains: GP-based modeling, risk assessment, and optimization and control. The authors argue that GPs fit modern grids because renewables and distributed resources make operations uncertain, while sensors generate the data needed to learn power-flow and dynamic models probabilistically. The central contribution is a map of how GPs have been used, which kernel and model variants proved useful where, and where the remaining gaps are. The paper closes with lessons for when GPs are and are not appropriate, and with future directions in interpretability, scalability, robustness, and integration with deep learning.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Gaussian process itself: a prior distribution over functions in which any finite collection of function values is jointly Gaussian, so posterior prediction at new inputs has closed-form mean and variance. In the power-system context, the paper uses this machinery to treat the inverse power-flow map from net load to voltages, the time-dependent map from uncertain injections to dynamic states, and the map from load and renewable scenarios to optimal dispatch as functions that can be learned from data. The closed-form posterior is what carries the argument: it turns a learned surrogate into quantifiable violation probabilities, differentiable constraints, and sensitivity indices without extra sampling. The paper's taxonomy, with its tabulated applications, is the organizing device that ties individual GP variants - sparse, multi-task, deep, censored, and heteroscedastic - to concrete grid tasks.

What would settle it

A reader could test the completeness claim by compiling all peer-reviewed GP-for-power-system papers from major journals and conferences before 2025 and checking whether each application category appears in the paper's tables or text; any significant uncategorized body of work would refute the 'comprehensive' characterization.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that GP applications in power systems have matured enough to warrant a systematic, first-of-its-kind review, and that the literature forms a coherent landscape: forecasting and static or dynamic modeling provide GP surrogates for power flows; those surrogates feed risk assessment through closed-form violation probabilities; and the same closed-form expressions allow GP models to be embedded inside chance-constrained optimization and control. The paper presents the GP prior over functions, the posterior conditioning formulas, and kernel designs such as the vertex-degree kernel as the common machinery behind these applications. It further claims that GP's advantages - nonparametric flexibility, well-calibrated uncertainty, and small-data efficiency - are exactly what safety-critical grid operation needs, while the main barriers are cubic scaling, robustness to non-Gaussian noise, and online adaptation.

Load-bearing premise

The survey's usefulness depends on its literature selection being comprehensive and representative, since both the 'first comprehensive survey' claim and the Section VI guidance rest on the tables capturing the actual state of GP applications in power systems.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the survey's map is right, GP-based surrogates can replace traditional linearized power-flow approximations in distribution and transmission studies, preserving accuracy while supplying uncertainty bands.
  • Closed-form GP posteriors allow risk metrics such as voltage-violation probability, line-overload risk, and transient-stability indices to be computed without repeated Monte Carlo simulation.
  • The same expressions can be embedded as chance constraints in optimal power flow and model predictive control, giving optimization problems that explicitly account for renewable and load uncertainty.
  • The taxonomy implies that mature GP variants and kernel designs, including sparse and multi-output versions, are ready for near-real-time grid applications at moderate scale.
  • The gaps the paper identifies - scalability, robustness, and online adaptation - define a concrete research agenda for moving GP methods onto large grids.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that a GP surrogate is only as trustworthy as the kernel's match to the true power-flow manifold; strongly discrete behavior, such as topology switching, may need structural kernels or hybrid models rather than standard smooth kernels.
  • The same surveyed techniques could transfer to other networked infrastructure, such as gas or district-heating grids, where uncertain injection-to-state maps also need probabilistic surrogates.
  • A testable extension would be a common benchmark of GP variants on standard power-system test cases, since the current literature is fragmented across different feeders, time horizons, and error metrics.
  • The survey points toward convergence between GP and deep learning but leaves open whether end-to-end deep kernels retain the small-data and calibration advantages that motivate GP in the first place.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript surveys Gaussian process (GP) techniques and their applications in power systems, organizing the literature into GP-based modeling (forecasting, steady-state power flow, dynamics, probabilistic OPF), risk assessment, and optimization/control. It also provides GP preliminaries, a comparison of GP software packages, an illustrative GP load-forecasting example, three tables of application summaries, and a discussion of challenges and future directions. The paper claims in Section I to be the first comprehensive survey of GP applications in power systems.

Significance. If its comprehensiveness claim is substantiated, the survey would serve as a useful reference map and taxonomy for a fast-growing area, and the lessons in Section VI could help practitioners choose when GP is appropriate. The GP preliminaries are mostly standard and correct, and the paper draws attention to important application niches such as distribution system state estimation, rare-event risk assessment, and chance-constrained OPF. However, the central claim of being the first comprehensive survey is currently not verifiable: no literature-search methodology is provided, several references are duplicated, and no comparison with previous surveys is made. The technical presentation also contains a clear typo in Eq. (7). These issues are local and fixable, but they must be addressed before the survey's authority as an unbiased map of the field can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section I] The claim that this is "the first to provide a comprehensive survey of GP applications in power systems" is not substantiated. The manuscript gives no literature-search protocol, no inclusion/exclusion criteria, and no comparison with earlier GP or power-system reviews, so "comprehensive" is an assertion rather than a demonstrable property. This is load-bearing because Tables IV-VI and the guidance in Section VI derive their authority from that claim. Add a methodology subsection describing the databases searched, the screening process, and the criteria for inclusion, and explicitly state how the survey compares with prior surveys.
  2. [References] The reference list contains multiple duplicate entries, indicating that the literature database was not carefully curated: [26] and [46] are the same paper, [55] and [71] are the same paper, [76] and [103] are the same paper, and [75]/[135] and [80]/[136] also appear to be duplicate entries (the latter pair even disagreeing on the year). This undermines the reliability of the citation map and must be fixed before the comprehensiveness claim can be assessed.
  3. [Eq. (7)] The log marginal likelihood is written as -1/2 [ y^T [K + sigma_epsilon^2 I] y + log|K + sigma_epsilon^2 I| + N log 2pi ], which is not the correct objective for GP hyperparameter learning: the quadratic form is missing the inverse, and the constant term is missing its factor of 1/2. The expression should read -1/2 y^T (K + sigma_epsilon^2 I)^{-1} y - 1/2 log|K + sigma_epsilon^2 I| - N/2 log 2pi. As written, Eq. (7) is dimensionally inconsistent and would not give the training procedure described in Section II-A.
  4. [Tables IV-VI and Section VI] A substantial share of the applications cited in Tables IV-VI and in the running text are authored by the same research groups as this survey (e.g., [10], [54], [57], [62]-[64], [66]-[67], [74], [80]-[81], [88]-[89], [92], [98]-[99], [104], [114]-[117], [122]). Without a documented selection methodology, it is impossible to determine whether these tables represent the state of the art or an output-biased sample, which directly affects the practical guidance in Section VI. The authors should either provide evidence of systematic coverage beyond their own works or remove/qualify the "first comprehensive" claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II-A] The notation is inconsistent: f(x) is said to contain N function values while the input vector is defined as x = (x_1, ..., x_k). Use a consistent number of samples N throughout.
  2. [Section III-A, Eq. (9)] The notation x_t' in the covariance argument is unexplained; the covariance should be evaluated at the relevant input vectors (for example, x_t and x_{t+k}).
  3. [Section III-C, Eq. (16)] The text states that the system is "linearized" via an Euler-based explicit scheme, but Euler discretization is not linearization. Reword to "discretized".
  4. [Table II] The table lists scikit-learn GP, but the text in Section II-B does not mention scikit-learn among the Python GP libraries; add a sentence or remove the entry for consistency.
  5. [Section VI] The claim that "as the output dimension increases, the computational complexity grows cubically" is imprecise: cubic complexity in standard GP is with respect to the number of training points, and the dependence on output dimension depends on whether a multi-output covariance is used.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the paper is a literature survey whose claims are categorical and bibliographic, not derived from fitted parameters or self-citation chains.

full rationale

The paper is a survey, not a derivation, so the enumerated circularity patterns do not apply. Its technical content (GP regression equations (6), kernel table, forecasting formulation (8)-(10), VDK kernel (13), risk formulas (20)-(21)) restates standard Gaussian-process machinery from textbooks such as Rasmussen and Williams, and none of these equations are defined in terms of the survey's classification or conclusions. The application tables summarize external papers; while many entries are authored by the same research groups, using one's own papers in a literature review is normal self-citation and is not load-bearing in a mathematical sense. The 'first comprehensive survey' claim in Section I is not demonstrated by a documented search protocol, and the duplicate reference entries ([26]/[46], [55]/[71], [76]/[103]) indicate curation issues, but these are correctness/completeness concerns rather than circular reasoning. No step in the paper fits fitted-input-called-prediction, self-definition, or imported-uniqueness patterns. Accordingly, no circular step can be quoted, and the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no new free parameters or entities. It relies on standard GP theory and power flow models, plus the implicit assumption that the surveyed literature is representative of the field. The absence of new entities is expected for a review paper.

assumptions (3)
  • standard math Gaussian process is defined as a collection of random variables such that any finite subset has a joint multivariate Gaussian distribution (Rasmussen & Williams).
    Used in Section II-A as the foundation for all GP formulations in the survey.
  • domain assumption Power flow equations (11) model the steady-state relationship between net loads and voltages.
    Used as the physical basis for GP power flow learning in Section III-B.
  • ad hoc to paper The reviewed applications in Tables IV-VI are representative of GP usage in power systems.
    The comprehensiveness claim stated in Section I depends on this selection assumption, which is not independently verified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gaussian Processes in Power Systems: Techniques, Applications, and Future Works." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DK5A5VCF

@misc{pith2026250515950,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gaussian Processes in Power Systems: Techniques, Applications, and Future Works},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DK5A5VCF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.15950}
}
read the original abstract

The increasing integration of renewable energy sources (RESs) and distributed energy resources (DERs) has significantly heightened operational complexity and uncertainty in modern power systems. Concurrently, the widespread deployment of smart meters, phasor measurement units (PMUs) and other sensors has generated vast spatiotemporal data streams, enabling advanced data-driven analytics and decision-making in grid operations. In this context, Gaussian processes (GPs) have emerged as a powerful probabilistic framework, offering uncertainty quantification, non-parametric modeling, and predictive capabilities to enhance power system analysis and control. This paper presents a comprehensive review of GP techniques and their applications in power system operation and control. GP applications are reviewed across three key domains: GP-based modeling, risk assessment, and optimization and control. These areas serve as representative examples of how GP can be utilized in power systems. Furthermore, critical challenges in GP applications are discussed, and potential research directions are outlined to facilitate future power system operations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.15950 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of GP applications across various domains of power systems. GP-based learning techniques have been used to support load and renewable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of linear, polynomial, and GP regressions (using Square [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Load forecasting example using GP with squared exponential kernel. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

145 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [46]

    Residential load forecasting: An online-offline deep kernel learning method,

    Y . Li, F. Zhang, Y . Liu, H. Liao, H.-T. Zhang, and C. Chung, “Residential load forecasting: An online-offline deep kernel learning method,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 4264–4278, 2024

    2024

  2. [71]

    Probabilistic power flow based on a Gaussian process emulator,

    Y . Xu, Z. Hu, L. Mili, M. Korkali, and X. Chen, “Probabilistic power flow based on a Gaussian process emulator,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 3278–3281, 2020

    2020

  3. [103]

    Inferring power system dynamics from synchrophasor data using Gaussian processes,

    M. Jalali, V . Kekatos, S. Bhela, H. Zhu, and V . A. Centeno, “Inferring power system dynamics from synchrophasor data using Gaussian processes,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 4409–4423, 2022

    work page 2022

  4. [54]

    A framework for analytical power flow solution using Gaussian process learning,

    P. Pareek and H. D. Nguyen, “A framework for analytical power flow solution using Gaussian process learning,”IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 452–463, 2021

    2021

  5. [69]

    A framework for analytical power flow solution using Gaussian process learning,

    P. Pareek and H. D. Nguyen, “A framework for analytical power flow solution using Gaussian process learning,”IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 452–463, 2022

    2022

  6. [75]

    Dynamic security assessment of small-signal stability for power grids using windowed online Gaussian process,

    C. Zhai, H. D. Nguyen, and X. Zong, “Dynamic security assessment of small-signal stability for power grids using windowed online Gaussian process,”IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1170–1179, 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [135]

    Dynamic security assessment of small-signal stability for power grids using windowed online gaussian process,

    C. Zhai, H. D. Nguyen, and X. Zong, “Dynamic security assessment of small-signal stability for power grids using windowed online gaussian process,”IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1170–1179, 2023

    work page 2023

  8. [80]

    Estimating the region of attraction for power systems using Gaussian process and converse lyapunov function,

    C. Zhai and H. D. Nguyen, “Estimating the region of attraction for power systems using Gaussian process and converse lyapunov function,”IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 1328– 1335, 2022

    work page 2022

  9. [136]

    Estimating the region of attraction for power systems using Gaussian process and converse lyapunov function,

    C. Zhai and H. D. Nguyen, “Estimating the region of attraction for power systems using Gaussian process and converse lyapunov function,”IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 1328– 1335, 2021

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    Fast risk assessment in power grids through novel Gaussian process and active learning,

    P. Pareek, D. Deka, and S. Misra, “Fast risk assessment in power grids through novel Gaussian process and active learning,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.07867, 2023

    arXiv 2023

  11. [57]

    Optimal steady-state voltage control using Gaussian process learning,

    P. Pareek, W. Yu, and H. D. Nguyen, “Optimal steady-state voltage control using Gaussian process learning,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 7017–7027, 2020

    2020

  12. [62]

    Physics-informed sparse Gaussian process for probabilistic stability analysis of large-scale power system with dynamic PVs and loads,

    K. Ye, J. Zhao, N. Duan, and Y . Zhang, “Physics-informed sparse Gaussian process for probabilistic stability analysis of large-scale power system with dynamic PVs and loads,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 2868–2879, 2023

    2023

  13. [64]

    Gaussian process learning-based proba- bilistic optimal power flow,

    P. Pareek and H. D. Nguyen, “Gaussian process learning-based proba- bilistic optimal power flow,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 541–544, 2021

    2021

  14. [66]

    Scalable risk assessment of rare events in power systems with uncertain wind generation and loads,

    B. Tan, J. Zhao, and Y . Chen, “Scalable risk assessment of rare events in power systems with uncertain wind generation and loads,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., pp. 1–15, 2024

    2024

  15. [67]

    Power system overloading risk assessment considering topology and renewable uncertainties,

    K. Ye, J. Zhao, M. Hong, S. Maslennikov, B. Tan, and X. Luo, “Power system overloading risk assessment considering topology and renewable uncertainties,” inProc. IEEE Power Energy Soc. General Meeting, 2024, pp. 1–5

    2024

  16. [74]

    Transferable deep kernel emulator for probabilistic load margin assessment with topology changes, uncertain renewable generations and loads,

    B. Tan, J. Zhao, and L. Xie, “Transferable deep kernel emulator for probabilistic load margin assessment with topology changes, uncertain renewable generations and loads,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 5740–5754, 2023

    work page 2023

  17. [81]

    Bayesian post-fault power system dynamic trajectory prediction,

    B. Tan and J. Zhao, “Bayesian post-fault power system dynamic trajectory prediction,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2025

    work page 2025

  18. [88]

    Data-driven stochastic AC-OPF using Gaussian process regression,

    M. Mitrovic, A. Lukashevich, P. V orobev, V . Terzija, S. Budennyy, Y . Maximov, and D. Deka, “Data-driven stochastic AC-OPF using Gaussian process regression,”Int. J. Elect. Power Energy Syst., vol. 152, 2023, Art. no. 109249

    work page 2023

  19. [89]

    Fast data-driven chance constrained AC-OPF using hybrid sparse Gaussian processes,

    M. Mitrovic, A. Lukashevich, P. V orobev, V . Terzija, Y . Maximov, and D. Deka, “Fast data-driven chance constrained AC-OPF using hybrid sparse Gaussian processes,” inProc. IEEE Belgrade PowerTech, 2023, pp. 1–7

    work page 2023

  20. [92]

    Analytic neural network Gaussian process enabled chance-constrained voltage regulation for active distribution systems with PVs, batteries and EVs,

    T. Su, J. Zhao, Y . Pei, Y . Yao, and F. Ding, “Analytic neural network Gaussian process enabled chance-constrained voltage regulation for active distribution systems with PVs, batteries and EVs,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2025

    work page 2025

  21. [98]

    Deep sigma point processes-assisted chance-constrained power system transient stability preventive control,

    T. Su, J. Zhao, and X. Chen, “Deep sigma point processes-assisted chance-constrained power system transient stability preventive control,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1965–1978, 2024

    work page 1965

  22. [99]

    Safe reinforcement learning-based transient stability control for islanded microgrids with topology reconfiguration,

    T. Su, J. Zhao, Y . Yao, A. Selim, and F. Ding, “Safe reinforcement learning-based transient stability control for islanded microgrids with topology reconfiguration,”IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2025

    work page 2025

  23. [104]

    Hypothesis testing for mitigation of operational infeasibility on distribution system under 15 rising renewable penetration,

    Y . Weng, S. Ly, P. Wang, and H. D. Nguyen, “Hypothesis testing for mitigation of operational infeasibility on distribution system under 15 rising renewable penetration,”IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 876–891, 2022

    work page 2022

  24. [114]

    Asymmetrically recip- rocal effects and congestion management in TSO-DSO coordination through feasibility regularizer,

    Y . Weng, J. Xie, P. Wang, and H. D. Nguyen, “Asymmetrically recip- rocal effects and congestion management in TSO-DSO coordination through feasibility regularizer,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 1948–1962, 2022

    work page 1948

  25. [117]

    Topology change aware data-driven probabilistic distribution state estimation based on Gaussian process,

    D. Cao, J. Zhao, W. Hu, Q. Liao, Q. Huang, and Z. Chen, “Topology change aware data-driven probabilistic distribution state estimation based on Gaussian process,”IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1317–1320, 2022

    work page 2022

  26. [122]

    Multi-fidelity Gaussian process for distribution system voltage probabilistic estimation with PVs,

    J. Zhang, J. Zhao, K. Ye, and F. Ding, “Multi-fidelity Gaussian process for distribution system voltage probabilistic estimation with PVs,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Energy Internet Energy Syst. Integration, 2022, pp. 3088–3093

    work page 2022

Show all 145 references
  1. [1]

    A review of current challenges and trends in energy systems modeling,

    P. Lopion, P. Markewitz, M. Robinius, and D. Stolten, “A review of current challenges and trends in energy systems modeling,”Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 96, pp. 156–166, 2018

    2018

  2. [2]

    Reinforcement learning and its applications in modern power and energy systems: A review,

    D. Cao, W. Hu, J. Zhao, G. Zhang, B. Zhang, Z. Liu, Z. Chen, and F. Blaabjerg, “Reinforcement learning and its applications in modern power and energy systems: A review,”J. Modern Power Syst. Clean Energy, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1029–1042, 2020

    2020

  3. [3]

    Support vector machines,

    M. Hearst, S. Dumais, E. Osuna, J. Platt, and B. Scholkopf, “Support vector machines,”IEEE Intell. Syst. Appl., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 18–28, 1998

    1998

  4. [4]

    Transformer in transformer,

    K. Han, A. Xiao, E. Wu, J. Guo, C. XU, and Y . Wang, “Transformer in transformer,” inProc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 34, 2021, pp. 15 908–15 919

    2021

  5. [5]

    Deep Gaussian processes: A survey,

    K. Jakkala, “Deep Gaussian processes: A survey,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.12135, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  6. [6]

    C. M. Bishop and N. M. Nasrabadi,Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer, 2006, vol. 4, no. 4

    2006

  7. [7]

    C. K. Williams and C. E. Rasmussen,Gaussian processes for machine learning. MIT press Cambridge, MA, 2006, vol. 2, no. 3

    2006

  8. [8]

    Beyond intuition, a framework for applying gps to real-world data,

    K. Tazi, J. A. Lin, R. Viljoen, A. Gardner, S. John, H. Ge, and R. E. Turner, “Beyond intuition, a framework for applying gps to real-world data,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.03093, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  9. [9]

    Local and global sparse Gaussian process approximations,

    E. Snelson and Z. Ghahramani, “Local and global sparse Gaussian process approximations,” inProc. Artif. Intell. Statist., 2007, pp. 524– 531

    2007

  10. [11]

    K. P. Murphy,Probabilistic machine learning: an introduction. MIT press, 2022

    2022

  11. [12]

    Kernel interpolation for scalable struc- tured Gaussian processes (KISS-GP),

    A. Wilson and H. Nickisch, “Kernel interpolation for scalable struc- tured Gaussian processes (KISS-GP),” inProc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., 2015, pp. 1775–1784

    2015

  12. [13]

    Deep kernel learning,

    A. G. Wilson, Z. Hu, R. Salakhutdinov, and E. P. Xing, “Deep kernel learning,” inProc. Artif. Intell. Statist., 2016, pp. 370–378

    2016

  13. [14]

    GPflow: A Gaussian process library using TensorFlow,

    A. G. d. G. Matthews, M. Van Der Wilk, T. Nickson, K. Fujii, A. Boukouvalas, P. Le, Z. Ghahramani, J. Hensmanet al., “GPflow: A Gaussian process library using TensorFlow,”J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 18, no. 40, pp. 1–6, 2017. 13

    2017

  14. [15]

    Gpytorch: Blackbox matrix-matrix Gaussian process inference with gpu acceleration,

    J. Gardner, G. Pleiss, K. Q. Weinberger, D. Bindel, and A. G. Wilson, “Gpytorch: Blackbox matrix-matrix Gaussian process inference with gpu acceleration,” inProc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 31, 2018

    2018

  15. [16]

    BoTorch: A framework for efficient Monte- Carlo Bayesian optimization,

    M. Balandat, B. Karrer, D. R. Jiang, S. Daulton, B. Letham, A. G. Wilson, and E. Bakshy, “BoTorch: A framework for efficient Monte- Carlo Bayesian optimization,” inProc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2020

    2020

  16. [17]

    Power load probability density forecasting using Gaussian process quantile regression,

    Y . Yang, S. Li, W. Li, and M. Qu, “Power load probability density forecasting using Gaussian process quantile regression,”Appl. Energy, vol. 213, pp. 499–509, 2018

    2018

  17. [18]

    Review on probabilistic forecasting of wind power generation,

    Y . Zhang, J. Wang, and X. Wang, “Review on probabilistic forecasting of wind power generation,”Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 32, pp. 255–270, 2014

    2014

  18. [19]

    Short-term electric load pre- diction in smart grid using multi-output Gaussian processes regression,

    A. Ghasempour and M. Mart ´ınez-Ram´on, “Short-term electric load pre- diction in smart grid using multi-output Gaussian processes regression,” inProc. IEEE Kansas Power Energy Conf., 2023, pp. 1–6

    2023

  19. [20]

    Anaya-Lara, N

    O. Anaya-Lara, N. Jenkins, J. B. Ekanayake, P. Cartwright, and M. Hughes,Wind energy generation: modelling and control. John Wiley & Sons, 2011

    2011

  20. [21]

    Review of load forecasting based on artificial intelligence methodologies, models, and challenges,

    H. Hou, C. Liu, Q. Wang, X. Wu, J. Tang, Y . Shi, and C. Xie, “Review of load forecasting based on artificial intelligence methodologies, models, and challenges,”Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 210, 2022, Art. no. 108067

    2022

  21. [22]

    Short- term residential load forecasting based on LSTM recurrent neural network,

    W. Kong, Z. Y . Dong, Y . Jia, D. J. Hill, Y . Xu, and Y . Zhang, “Short- term residential load forecasting based on LSTM recurrent neural network,”IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 841–851, 2019

    2019

  22. [23]

    Short-term load forecasting for community battery systems based on temporal convolutional networks,

    C. Zuo and W. Hu, “Short-term load forecasting for community battery systems based on temporal convolutional networks,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Inf. Technol., Big Data Artif. Intell., vol. 2, 2021, pp. 11–16

    2021

  23. [24]

    A survey on deep learning methods for power load and renewable energy forecasting in smart microgrids,

    S. Aslam, H. Herodotou, S. M. Mohsin, N. Javaid, N. Ashraf, and S. Aslam, “A survey on deep learning methods for power load and renewable energy forecasting in smart microgrids,”Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 144, 2021, Art. no. 110992

    2021

  24. [25]

    Short-term load forecasting based on a semi-parametric additive model,

    S. Fan and R. J. Hyndman, “Short-term load forecasting based on a semi-parametric additive model,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 134–141, 2012

    2012

  25. [27]

    A hybrid approach based on the Gaussian process with t-observation model for short-term wind speed forecasts,

    J. Hu, J. Wang, and L. Xiao, “A hybrid approach based on the Gaussian process with t-observation model for short-term wind speed forecasts,” Renew. Energy, vol. 114, pp. 670–685, 2017

    2017

  26. [28]

    Short-term wind speed prediction using empirical wavelet transform and Gaussian process regression,

    J. Hu and J. Wang, “Short-term wind speed prediction using empirical wavelet transform and Gaussian process regression,”Energy, vol. 93, pp. 1456–1466, 2015

    2015

  27. [29]

    Forecasting of daily global solar radiation using wavelet transform-coupled Gaussian process re- gression: Case study in spain,

    C. Huang, Z. Zhang, and A. Bensoussan, “Forecasting of daily global solar radiation using wavelet transform-coupled Gaussian process re- gression: Case study in spain,” inProc. IEEE Innovat. Smart Grid Technol. Asia, 2016, pp. 799–804

    2016

  28. [30]

    Wavelet-Gaussian process regression model for forecasting daily solar radiation in the saharan climate,

    K. Ferkous, F. Chellali, A. Kouzou, and B. Bekkar, “Wavelet-Gaussian process regression model for forecasting daily solar radiation in the saharan climate,”Clean Energy, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 316–328, 2021

    2021

  29. [31]

    PV power forecasting using an integrated GA-PSO-ANFIS approach and Gaussian process regression based feature selection strategy,

    Y . K. Semero, J. Zhang, and D. Zheng, “PV power forecasting using an integrated GA-PSO-ANFIS approach and Gaussian process regression based feature selection strategy,”CSEE J. Power Energy Syst., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 210–218, 2018

    2018

  30. [32]

    Wind speed prediction method using shared weight long short-term memory network and Gaussian process regression,

    Z. Zhang, L. Ye, H. Qin, Y . Liu, C. Wang, X. Yu, X. Yin, and J. Li, “Wind speed prediction method using shared weight long short-term memory network and Gaussian process regression,”Appl. Energy, vol. 247, pp. 270–284, 2019

    2019

  31. [33]

    Wind power forecasts using Gaussian processes and numerical weather prediction,

    N. Chen, Z. Qian, I. T. Nabney, and X. Meng, “Wind power forecasts using Gaussian processes and numerical weather prediction,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 656–665, 2013

    2013

  32. [34]

    An integrated Gaussian process modeling framework for residential load prediction,

    G. Xie, X. Chen, and Y . Weng, “An integrated Gaussian process modeling framework for residential load prediction,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 7238–7248, 2018

    2018

  33. [35]

    A sparse heteroscedastic model for the probabilistic load forecasting in energy-intensive enterprises,

    P. Kou and F. Gao, “A sparse heteroscedastic model for the probabilistic load forecasting in energy-intensive enterprises,”Int. J. Elect. Power Energy Syst., vol. 55, pp. 144–154, 2014

    2014

  34. [36]

    Probabilistic forecasting of electricity consumption, photovoltaic power generation and net demand of an individual building using Gaussian processes,

    D. W. Van der Meer, M. Shepero, A. Svensson, J. Wid ´en, and J. Munkhammar, “Probabilistic forecasting of electricity consumption, photovoltaic power generation and net demand of an individual building using Gaussian processes,”Appl. Energy, vol. 213, pp. 195–207, 2018

    2018

  35. [37]

    Sparse variational Gaussian process based day-ahead probabilistic wind power forecasting,

    H. Wen, J. Ma, J. Gu, L. Yuan, and Z. Jin, “Sparse variational Gaussian process based day-ahead probabilistic wind power forecasting,”IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 957–970, 2022

    2022

  36. [38]

    Probabilistic net load forecasting based on sparse variational Gaussian process regression,

    W. Feng, B. Deng, T. Chen, Z. Zhang, Y . Fu, Y . Zheng, L. Zhang, and Z. Jing, “Probabilistic net load forecasting based on sparse variational Gaussian process regression,”Front. Energy Res., vol. 12, 2024, Art. no. 1429241

    2024

  37. [39]

    Multiple output sparse Gaussian processes for short-term electric load forecasting,

    A. Ghasempour and M. Mart ´ınez-Ram´on, “Multiple output sparse Gaussian processes for short-term electric load forecasting,” inProc. Int. Conf. Power Energy Technol., 2023, pp. 938–942

    2023

  38. [40]

    A novel hybrid approach based on variational heteroscedastic Gaussian process regression for multi- step ahead wind speed forecasting,

    C. Zhang, T. Peng, and M. S. Nazir, “A novel hybrid approach based on variational heteroscedastic Gaussian process regression for multi- step ahead wind speed forecasting,”Int. J. Elect. Power Energy Syst., vol. 136, 2022, Art. no. 107717

    2022

  39. [41]

    Sparse Gaussian process regression for multi-step ahead forecasting of wind gusts combining numerical weather predictions and on-site measurements,

    H. Wang, Y .-M. Zhang, and J.-X. Mao, “Sparse Gaussian process regression for multi-step ahead forecasting of wind gusts combining numerical weather predictions and on-site measurements,”J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., vol. 220, 2022, Art. no. 104873

    2022

  40. [42]

    A Gaussian process regression based hybrid approach for short-term wind speed prediction,

    C. Zhang, H. Wei, X. Zhao, T. Liu, and K. Zhang, “A Gaussian process regression based hybrid approach for short-term wind speed prediction,”Energy Convers. Manage., vol. 126, pp. 1084–1092, 2016

    2016

  41. [43]

    A compositional kernel based Gaussian process approach to day-ahead residential load forecasting,

    K. Dab, K. Agbossou, N. Henao, Y . Dub ´e, S. Kelouwani, and S. S. Hosseini, “A compositional kernel based Gaussian process approach to day-ahead residential load forecasting,”Energy Build., vol. 254, 2022, Art. no. 111459

    2022

  42. [44]

    Evaluating the potential of Gaussian process regression for solar radiation forecasting: A case study,

    F. Lubbe, J. Maritz, and T. Harms, “Evaluating the potential of Gaussian process regression for solar radiation forecasting: A case study,”Energies, vol. 13, no. 20, p. 5509, 2020

    2020

  43. [45]

    Robust deep Gaussian process-based probabilistic electrical load fore- casting against anomalous events,

    D. Cao, J. Zhao, W. Hu, Y . Zhang, Q. Liao, Z. Chen, and F. Blaabjerg, “Robust deep Gaussian process-based probabilistic electrical load fore- casting against anomalous events,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1142–1153, 2021

    2021

  44. [47]

    Multi-energy load fore- casting for small-sample integrated energy systems based on neural network Gaussian process and multi-task learning,

    W. Zhang, Y . Cai, H. Zhan, and M. Yang, “Multi-energy load fore- casting for small-sample integrated energy systems based on neural network Gaussian process and multi-task learning,”Energy Convers. Manage., vol. 321, 2024, Art. no. 119027

    2024

  45. [48]

    Probabilistic modelling of wind turbine power curves with application of heteroscedastic Gaussian process regres- sion,

    T. Rogers, P. Gardner, N. Dervilis, K. Worden, A. Maguire, E. Pap- atheou, and E. Cross, “Probabilistic modelling of wind turbine power curves with application of heteroscedastic Gaussian process regres- sion,”Renew. Energy, vol. 148, pp. 1124–1136, 2020

    2020

  46. [49]

    Probabilistic and deterministic wind speed forecasting based on non-parametric approaches and wind characteristics information,

    J. Heng, Y . Hong, J. Hu, and S. Wang, “Probabilistic and deterministic wind speed forecasting based on non-parametric approaches and wind characteristics information,”Appl. Energy, vol. 306, 2022, Art. no. 118029

    2022

  47. [50]

    Multitask Bayesian spatiotemporal Gaussian processes for short- term load forecasting,

    M. Gilanifar, H. Wang, L. M. K. Sriram, E. E. Ozguven, and R. Arghan- deh, “Multitask Bayesian spatiotemporal Gaussian processes for short- term load forecasting,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 5132–5143, 2019

    2019

  48. [51]

    Probabilistic wind power forecasting for newly-built wind farms based on multi- task Gaussian process method,

    Q. Liao, D. Cao, Z. Chen, F. Blaabjerg, and W. Hu, “Probabilistic wind power forecasting for newly-built wind farms based on multi- task Gaussian process method,”Renew. Energy, vol. 217, 2023, Art. no. 119054

    2023

  49. [52]

    Gaussian process regression for numerical wind speed prediction enhancement,

    H. Cai, X. Jia, J. Feng, W. Li, Y .-M. Hsu, and J. Lee, “Gaussian process regression for numerical wind speed prediction enhancement,”Renew. Energy, vol. 146, pp. 2112–2123, 2020

    2020

  50. [53]

    Kernel structure design for data-driven probabilistic load flow studies,

    J. Liu and P. Srikantha, “Kernel structure design for data-driven probabilistic load flow studies,”IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 2679–2689, 2022

    2022

  51. [56]

    A data-driven nonparametric approach for probabilistic load-margin assessment considering wind power penetration,

    Y . Xu, L. Mili, M. Korkali, K. Karra, Z. Zheng, and X. Chen, “A data-driven nonparametric approach for probabilistic load-margin assessment considering wind power penetration,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 4756–4768, 2020

    2020

  52. [58]

    Structure learning in power distribution networks,

    D. Deka, S. Backhaus, and M. Chertkov, “Structure learning in power distribution networks,”IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1061–1074, 2017

    2017

  53. [59]

    Data-efficient strategies for proba- bilistic voltage envelopes under network contingencies,

    P. Pareek, D. Deka, and S. Misra, “Data-efficient strategies for proba- bilistic voltage envelopes under network contingencies,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.00763, 2023. 14

    2023 arXiv

  54. [60]

    Contraction analysis of nonlinear DAE systems,

    H. D. Nguyen, T. L. Vu, J.-J. Slotine, and K. Turitsyn, “Contraction analysis of nonlinear DAE systems,”IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 429–436, 2021

    2021

  55. [61]

    Probabilistic robust small-signal stability framework using Gaussian process learning,

    P. Pareek and H. D. Nguyen, “Probabilistic robust small-signal stability framework using Gaussian process learning,”Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 188, 2020, Art. no. 106545

    2020

  56. [63]

    A high computationally efficient parallel partial Gaussian process for large-scale power system proba- bilistic transient stability assessment,

    K. Ye, J. Zhao, H. Li, and M. Gu, “A high computationally efficient parallel partial Gaussian process for large-scale power system proba- bilistic transient stability assessment,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 4650–4660, 2024

    2024

  57. [65]

    Review on risk assessment of power system,

    Y . Shiwen, H. Hui, W. Chengzhi, G. Hao, and F. Hao, “Review on risk assessment of power system,”Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 109, pp. 1200–1205, 2017

    2017

  58. [68]

    Non-parametric probabilistic load flow using Gaussian process learning,

    P. Pareek, C. Wang, and H. D. Nguyen, “Non-parametric probabilistic load flow using Gaussian process learning,”Physica D: Nonlinear Phenom., vol. 424, 2021, Art. no. 132941

    2021

  59. [70]

    Proba- bilistic load-margin assessment using vine copula and Gaussian process emulation,

    Y . Xu, K. Karra, L. Mili, M. Korkali, X. Chen, and Z. Hu, “Proba- bilistic load-margin assessment using vine copula and Gaussian process emulation,” inProc. IEEE Power Energy Soc. General Meeting, 2020, pp. 1–5

    2020

  60. [72]

    Online Gaussian process learning for security assessment,

    C. Zhai, “Online Gaussian process learning for security assessment,” inControl Optim. Methods Complex Syst. Resil.Springer, 2023, pp. 81–97

    2023

  61. [73]

    Probabilistic stability analysis: the way forward for stability analysis of sustainable power systems,

    J. V . Milanovi ´c, “Probabilistic stability analysis: the way forward for stability analysis of sustainable power systems,”Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A.: Math., Physi. Eng. Sci., vol. 375, no. 2100, 2017

    2017

  62. [77]

    Inferring power system frequency oscillations using Gaussian processes,

    M. Jalali, V . Kekatos, S. Bhela, and H. Zhu, “Inferring power system frequency oscillations using Gaussian processes,” inProc. IEEE Conf. Decis. Control, 2021, pp. 3670–3676

    2021

  63. [78]

    Interpretable data-driven probabilistic power system load margin assessment with uncertain renewable energy and loads,

    B. Tan, J. Zhao, W. Liu, and N. Duan, “Interpretable data-driven probabilistic power system load margin assessment with uncertain renewable energy and loads,” inIEEE Innov. Smart Grid Technol. Asia, 2022, pp. 56–60

    2022

  64. [79]

    Gaussian process regression based inertia emulation and reserve estimation for grid interfaced photovoltaic system,

    S. Kanwal, B. Khan, S. Ali, and C. Mehmood, “Gaussian process regression based inertia emulation and reserve estimation for grid interfaced photovoltaic system,”Renew. Energy, vol. 126, pp. 865–875, 2018

    2018

  65. [82]

    Improvement of Gaussian process predictor of electric power damage caused by typhoons considering time-varying characteristics,

    T. Hachino, S. Okubo, H. Takata, S. Fukushima, and Y . Igarashi, “Improvement of Gaussian process predictor of electric power damage caused by typhoons considering time-varying characteristics,”Int. J. Electron. Elect. Eng., vol. 3, pp. 263–268, 2015

    2015

  66. [83]

    Data driven approach for fault detection and Gaussian process regression based location prognosis in smart ac microgrid,

    A. Srivastava and S. Parida, “Data driven approach for fault detection and Gaussian process regression based location prognosis in smart ac microgrid,”Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 208, 2022, Art. no. 107889

    2022

  67. [84]

    A robust fault detection and location prediction module using support vector machine and Gaussian process regression for AC microgrid,

    A. Srivastava and S.K Parida, “A robust fault detection and location prediction module using support vector machine and Gaussian process regression for AC microgrid,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 930–939, 2022

    2022

  68. [85]

    Wind turbine fault diagnosis based on Gaussian process classifiers applied to operational data,

    Y . Li, S. Liu, and L. Shu, “Wind turbine fault diagnosis based on Gaussian process classifiers applied to operational data,”Renew. Energy, vol. 134, pp. 357–366, 2019

    2019

  69. [86]

    The prediction method on the early failure of hydropower units based on Gaussian process regression driven by monitoring data,

    H. Huang, A. Qin, H. Mao, J. Fu, Z. Huang, Y . Yang, X. Li, and H. Huang, “The prediction method on the early failure of hydropower units based on Gaussian process regression driven by monitoring data,” Appl. Sci., vol. 11, no. 1, 2021

    2021

  70. [87]

    A data-driven mixed integer programming approach for joint chance-constrained optimal power flow under uncertainty,

    J. C. Qin, R. Jiang, H. Mo, and D. Dong, “A data-driven mixed integer programming approach for joint chance-constrained optimal power flow under uncertainty,”Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern., pp. 1– 17, 2024

    2024

  71. [90]

    Supervised learning for optimal power flow as a real-time proxy,

    R. Canyasse, G. Dalal, and S. Mannor, “Supervised learning for optimal power flow as a real-time proxy,” inProc. IEEE Power Energy Soc. Innov. Smart Grid Technol. Conf., 2017, pp. 1–5

    2017

  72. [91]

    Analytical uncertainty propagation for multi-period stochastic optimal power flow,

    R. Bauer, T. M ¨uhlpfordt, N. Ludwig, and V . Hagenmeyer, “Analytical uncertainty propagation for multi-period stochastic optimal power flow,”Sustain. Energy, Grids Netw., vol. 33, 2023, Art. no. 100969

    2023

  73. [93]

    Fast inverter control by learning the opf mapping using sensitivity- informed Gaussian processes,

    M. Jalali, M. K. Singh, V . Kekatos, G. B. Giannakis, and C.-C. Liu, “Fast inverter control by learning the opf mapping using sensitivity- informed Gaussian processes,”IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 2432–2445, 2022

    2022

  74. [94]

    Gaussian process regression-based smart inverters’ V olt-V AR control,

    T. O. Olowu, A. Debnath, I. O. Olasupo, and A. Sarwat, “Gaussian process regression-based smart inverters’ V olt-V AR control,” inProc. IEEE Ind. Appl. Soc. Annu. Meet., 2023, pp. 1–6

    2023

  75. [95]

    Data- driven energy management system with Gaussian process forecasting and MPC for interconnected microgrids,

    L. K. Gan, P. Zhang, J. Lee, M. A. Osborne, and D. A. Howey, “Data- driven energy management system with Gaussian process forecasting and MPC for interconnected microgrids,”IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 695–704, 2020

    2020

  76. [96]

    Optimal operation of an energy management system using model predictive control and Gaussian process time-series modeling,

    J. Lee, P. Zhang, L. K. Gan, D. A. Howey, M. A. Osborne, A. Tosi, and S. Duncan, “Optimal operation of an energy management system using model predictive control and Gaussian process time-series modeling,” IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Topics Power Electron., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1783– 1795, 2018

    2018

  77. [97]

    Data-driven demand response modeling and control of buildings with Gaussian processes,

    T. X. Nghiem and C. N. Jones, “Data-driven demand response modeling and control of buildings with Gaussian processes,” inProc. Amer. Control Conf., 2017, pp. 2919–2924

    2017

  78. [100]

    Gaussian process-based bayesian opti- mization for data-driven unit commitment,

    P. Nikolaidis and S. Chatzis, “Gaussian process-based bayesian opti- mization for data-driven unit commitment,”Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 130, 2021, Art. no. 106930

    2021

  79. [101]

    L. L. Grigsby,Power system stability and control. CRC press, 2007

    2007

  80. [102]

    Degradation-infused energy portfolio allocation framework: Risk-averse fair storage participation,

    P. Pareek, L. M. I. Sampath, A. Singh, L. Goel, H. B. Gooi, and H. D. Nguyen, “Degradation-infused energy portfolio allocation framework: Risk-averse fair storage participation,”Energy, vol. 313, p. 133688, 2024

    2024

  81. [105]

    Probabilistic- based optimal storage placement and sizing enabling networked micro- grid community,

    P. Pareek, J. Xie, Y . Weng, A. Singh, and H. D. Nguyen, “Probabilistic- based optimal storage placement and sizing enabling networked micro- grid community,” inProc. Int. Conf. Smart Energy Syst. Technol., 2021, pp. 1–6

    2021

  82. [106]

    Probabilistic security-constrained AC optimal power flow,

    M. Vrakopoulou, M. Katsampani, K. Margellos, J. Lygeros, and G. Andersson, “Probabilistic security-constrained AC optimal power flow,” inProc. IEEE PowerTech Conf., 2013, pp. 1–6

    2013

  83. [107]

    Chance-constrained AC optimal power flow: Reformulations and efficient algorithms,

    L. Roald and G. Andersson, “Chance-constrained AC optimal power flow: Reformulations and efficient algorithms,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 2906–2918, 2017

    2017

  84. [108]

    Model pre- dictive control of electric power systems based on Gaussian process predictors,

    T. Hachino, H. Takata, S. Fukushima, and Y . Igarashi, “Model pre- dictive control of electric power systems based on Gaussian process predictors,”J. Autom. Control Eng., vol. 3, no. 5, p. 70, 2015

    2015

  85. [109]

    Resilient cyber-physical energy systems using prior information based on Gaussian process,

    C. Konstantinou and O. M. Anubi, “Resilient cyber-physical energy systems using prior information based on Gaussian process,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 2160–2168, 2021

    2021

  86. [110]

    Global sensitivity analysis of large distribution system with PVs using deep Gaussian process,

    K. Ye, J. Zhao, F. Ding, R. Yang, X. Chen, and G. W. Dobbins, “Global sensitivity analysis of large distribution system with PVs using deep Gaussian process,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 4888– 4891, 2021

    2021

  87. [111]

    Probabilistic dynamic model of active distribution networks using Gaussian processes,

    G. Mitrentsis and H. Lens, “Probabilistic dynamic model of active distribution networks using Gaussian processes,” inProc. IEEE Madrid PowerTech, 2021, pp. 1–6

    2021

  88. [112]

    A Gaussian process framework for the probabilistic dynamic modeling of active distribution networks using exogenous variables,

    ——, “A Gaussian process framework for the probabilistic dynamic modeling of active distribution networks using exogenous variables,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 211, 2022, Art. no. 108403

    2022

  89. [113]

    Signal recovery in power systems by correlated Gaussian processes,

    M. Zimmer, D. Carta, T. Pesch, and A. Benigni, “Signal recovery in power systems by correlated Gaussian processes,”IEEE Open J. Ind. Electron. Soc., 2024

    2024

  90. [115]

    Gaussian process-based bilevel optimization with critical load restoration for system resilience improvement through data centers-to-grid scheme,

    Y . Liu, Y . Weng, R. Yang, Q.-T. Tran, and H. D. Nguyen, “Gaussian process-based bilevel optimization with critical load restoration for system resilience improvement through data centers-to-grid scheme,” Sustain. Energy, Grids Netw., vol. 34, 2023, Art. no. 101007

    2023

  91. [116]

    Distributed energy resource exploitation through co-optimization of power system and data centers with uncertainties during demand response,

    Y . Weng, Y . Liu, R. L. T. Lim, and H. D. Nguyen, “Distributed energy resource exploitation through co-optimization of power system and data centers with uncertainties during demand response,”Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 14, 2023, Art. no. 10995

    2023

  92. [118]

    Robust multiarea distribution system state estimation based on structure-informed graphic network and multitask Gaussian process,

    J. Hu, W. Hu, D. Cao, S. Li, J. Chen, Y . Huang, Z. Chen, and F. Blaabjerg, “Robust multiarea distribution system state estimation based on structure-informed graphic network and multitask Gaussian process,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 10 599–10 612, 2024

    2024

  93. [119]

    Multi time-scale imputation aided state estimation in distribution system,

    S. Dahale and B. Natarajan, “Multi time-scale imputation aided state estimation in distribution system,” inProc. IEEE Power Energy Soc. General Meeting, 2021, pp. 1–5

    2021

  94. [120]

    Forecasting- aided robust distribution state estimation based on physics-aware graph- ical learning and Gaussian process-aided residual modeling,

    D. Cao, J. Hu, W. Hu, W. Zhan, Q. Zhou, and Z. Chen, “Forecasting- aided robust distribution state estimation based on physics-aware graph- ical learning and Gaussian process-aided residual modeling,” inProc. Asia Energy Electr. Eng. Symp., 2024, pp. 1017–1020

    2024

  95. [121]

    Recursive Gaussian process over graphs for integrating multi-timescale measurements in low-observable distri- bution systems,

    S. Dahale and B. Natarajan, “Recursive Gaussian process over graphs for integrating multi-timescale measurements in low-observable distri- bution systems,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 3464– 3475, 2022

    2022

  96. [123]

    Deep multi-fidelity Bayesian data fusion for probabilistic distribution system voltage estimation with high penetration of PVs,

    J. Zhang, J. Zhao, J. Yang, and J. Zhao, “Deep multi-fidelity Bayesian data fusion for probabilistic distribution system voltage estimation with high penetration of PVs,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 3661–3672, 2024

    2024

  97. [124]

    High-dimension Bayesian parameter estimation for WECC composite load model using realistic event measurements,

    B. Tan and J. Zhao, “High-dimension Bayesian parameter estimation for WECC composite load model using realistic event measurements,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2025

    2025

  98. [125]

    Explainable learning with Gaussian processes,

    K. Butler, G. Feng, and P. M. Djuric, “Explainable learning with Gaussian processes,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07072, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  99. [126]

    On the identifiability and interpretability of Gaussian process models,

    J. Chen, W. Mu, Y . Li, and D. Li, “On the identifiability and interpretability of Gaussian process models,” inProc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 36, 2023, pp. 70 267–70 278

    2023

  100. [127]

    An interpretable and sample efficient deep kernel for Gaussian process,

    Y . Dai, T. Zhang, and Z. o. Lin, “An interpretable and sample efficient deep kernel for Gaussian process,” inProc. Int. Conf. Uncertainty Artif. Intell., 2020, pp. 759–768

    2020

  101. [128]

    Probabilistic physics-informed graph convolutional network for active distribution system voltage prediction,

    T. Su, J. Zhao, Y . Pei, and F. Ding, “Probabilistic physics-informed graph convolutional network for active distribution system voltage prediction,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 5969–5972, Nov. 2023

    2023

  102. [129]

    Gaussian processes for machine learning,

    M. Seeger, “Gaussian processes for machine learning,”Int. J. Neural Syst., vol. 14, no. 02, pp. 69–106, 2004

    2004

  103. [130]

    Gaussian processes for big data,

    J. Hensman, N. Fusi, and N. D. Lawrence, “Gaussian processes for big data,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1309.6835, 2013

    2013 arXiv

  104. [131]

    A robust generalized-maximum likelihood unscented kalman filter for power system dynamic state estimation,

    J. Zhao and L. Mili, “A robust generalized-maximum likelihood unscented kalman filter for power system dynamic state estimation,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 578–592, 2018

    2018

  105. [132]

    Diagnosis of outliers and cyber attacks in dynamic PMU-based power state estimation,

    Y . Chakhchoukh, H. Lei, and B. K. Johnson, “Diagnosis of outliers and cyber attacks in dynamic PMU-based power state estimation,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 1188–1197, 2019

    2019

  106. [133]

    Robust Gaussian process regression with huber likelihood,

    P. Algikar and L. Mili, “Robust Gaussian process regression with huber likelihood,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.07858

    2023 arXiv

  107. [134]

    A robust data-driven process modeling applied to time-series stochastic power flow,

    P. Algikar, Y . Xu, S. Yarahmadi, and L. Mili, “A robust data-driven process modeling applied to time-series stochastic power flow,”IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 693–705, 2023

    2023

  108. [137]

    Sparse online warped Gaussian process for wind power probabilistic forecasting,

    P. Kou, F. Gao, and X. Guan, “Sparse online warped Gaussian process for wind power probabilistic forecasting,”Appl. Energy, vol. 108, pp. 410–428, 2013

    2013

  109. [138]

    Incremental ensemble Gaussian processes,

    Q. Lu, G. V . Karanikolas, and G. B. Giannakis, “Incremental ensemble Gaussian processes,”IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 1876–1893, 2023

    2023

  110. [139]

    Ensemble Gaussian pro- cesses for online learning over graphs with adaptivity and scalability,

    K. D. Polyzos, Q. Lu, and G. B. Giannakis, “Ensemble Gaussian pro- cesses for online learning over graphs with adaptivity and scalability,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 70, pp. 17–30, 2022

    2022

  111. [140]

    Stochastic variational deep kernel learning,

    A. G. Wilson, Z. Hu, R. R. Salakhutdinov, and E. P. Xing, “Stochastic variational deep kernel learning,” inProc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 29, 2016

    2016

  112. [141]

    Wind turbine power curve modeling based on Gaussian processes and artificial neural networks,

    B. Manobel, F. Sehnke, J. A. Lazz ´us, I. Salfate, M. Felder, and S. Montecinos, “Wind turbine power curve modeling based on Gaussian processes and artificial neural networks,”Renew. Energy, vol. 125, pp. 1015–1020, 2018

    2018

  113. [142]

    Real-time rotor effective wind speed estimation using Gaussian process regression and kalman filtering,

    W. H. Lio, A. Li, and F. Meng, “Real-time rotor effective wind speed estimation using Gaussian process regression and kalman filtering,” Renew. Energy, vol. 169, pp. 670–686, 2021

    2021

  114. [143]

    Transient stability assessment of power systems based on kpca and Gaussian process,

    Y . Li and X. Gu, “Transient stability assessment of power systems based on kpca and Gaussian process,”WSEAS Trans. Power Syst., vol. 9, pp. 178–184, 2014

    2014

  115. [144]

    A review of safe reinforcement learning methods for modern power systems,

    T. Su, T. Wu, J. Zhao, A. Scaglione, and L. Xie, “A review of safe reinforcement learning methods for modern power systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.00304, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  116. [145]

    Safe-critical modular deep reinforcement learning with temporal logic through Gaussian processes and control barrier functions,

    M. Cai and C.-I. Vasile, “Safe-critical modular deep reinforcement learning with temporal logic through Gaussian processes and control barrier functions,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.02791, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  117. [146]

    Prediction of reward functions for deep reinforcement learning via Gaussian process regression,

    J. Lim, S. Ha, and J. Choi, “Prediction of reward functions for deep reinforcement learning via Gaussian process regression,”IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1739–1746, 2020

    2020

  118. [147]

    Personalized federated learning with Gaussian processes,

    I. Achituve, A. Shamsian, A. Navon, G. Chechik, and E. Fetaya, “Personalized federated learning with Gaussian processes,” inProc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 34, 2021, pp. 8392–8406

    2021

  119. [148]

    Use of Gaussian processes in system identification,

    S. S ¨arkk¨a, “Use of Gaussian processes in system identification,” in Encyclopedia of Systems and Control. Springer, 2021, pp. 2393–2402

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.