Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 89 references

MeerKAT Discovery of an Infalling Cold Gas Tail onto the Nearby Barred Spiral Galaxy, NGC 5643

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read MeerKAT 21-cm observations reveal a 30-kpc, counter-rotating H I tail that is accreting onto the disk of the nearby Seyfert galaxy NGC 5643.

desk verdict Genuinely new MeerKAT H I data and a real 30 kpc counter-rotating tail, but the 'infalling' label outruns the evidence; the authors themselves list several equally plausible origins. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.15983 v1 pith:2QBKEVSU submitted 2025-05-21 astro-ph.GA

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords neutralhydrogen(HI)MeerKATNGC5643Seyfertgalaxygasaccretioncounter-rotatinggalacticfountainAGNfueling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses MeerKAT 21-cm observations to map the neutral hydrogen (H I) in and around NGC 5643, a nearby barred Seyfert galaxy. It claims to detect a diffuse H I tail extending roughly 30 kpc north of the disk, with velocities counter to the galaxy's rotation, and interprets this tail as cold gas accreting onto the regularly rotating disk from the environment. If correct, this is direct evidence that cold circumgalactic gas is being added to a Seyfert galaxy today, replenishing the gas that star formation and nuclear activity consume. The observations also reveal six previously unknown low-mass H I companions, extraplanar gas tracing galactic fountains in the spiral arms, and slightly blue-shifted H I absorption toward the nucleus.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on a tilted-ring model of the H I disk built with the BBarolo code, which fits the disk's regular rotation with the position angle fixed at 315 degrees and the systemic velocity fixed at 1192 km/s, while the rotational velocity and inclination are free parameters in each ring. Subtracting this model from the data cube defines the residual gas that makes up the northern tail, so the tail's mass, extent, and counter-rotating velocities are all products of the model subtraction.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of the tail's three-dimensional motion—for example an H I absorption line toward a background source in the tail, or stellar velocities in the tail region—that shows the gas is actually rotating with the disk would falsify the accretion claim, as would a single warped-disk model with smoothly varying position angle and inclination that reproduces the observed tail without residual gas.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central finding is a 30-kpc column of H I north of NGC 5643 that appears to be falling onto the galaxy. In the position-velocity diagrams the tail extends beyond the systemic velocity and moves opposite to the disk rotation, deviating from the model by about 250 km/s at the disk's edge. The tail is visible in all three data cubes, so it is not a noise artifact. After subtracting a tilted-ring model that fits the regularly rotating disk, the leftover gas in the tail has a mass of roughly $4\times10^6$ to $5\times10^6\,M_\odot$, about 0.1 percent of the disk's H I mass. The paper argues that the tail is accreting H I, either pristine halo gas or gas tidally stripped from a small companion, and that its low H I deficiency rules out ram-pressure stripping as the cause.

Load-bearing premise

The tilted-ring model with fixed position angle and systemic velocity completely describes the galaxy's regular rotation, so that any gas left over after subtraction is truly a separate, non-rotating component rather than a warp or non-circular motion of the disk itself.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • NGC 5643 is actively accreting cold gas from its environment, providing a concrete local example of cold circumgalactic accretion onto a galaxy disk.
  • The accreted gas can help sustain star formation: the derived H I depletion time is about 1.8 Gyr, so external supply is needed to maintain the current star formation rate.
  • Through the bar's secular motions, some of the accreted gas may be channelled to the nucleus, potentially fuelling the Seyfert activity.
  • The discovery of six low-mass H I companions suggests NGC 5643 is not isolated but sits in a small group, changing the evolutionary history that must be assumed for it.
  • Sensitive H I imaging like this can reveal accretion signatures in nearby Seyferts that earlier single-dish or lower-resolution surveys could not see.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next test is to measure the metallicity of the tail gas: pristine halo gas should be significantly more metal-poor than gas stripped from a dwarf galaxy, which would settle the origin question.
  • If the tail is stripped dwarf gas, the surviving stellar remnant, with a stellar mass of about $10^4$ to $10^6\,M_\odot$, should be findable in deeper optical or near-infrared imaging near the tail's base, possibly as the bump the authors note in the upper spiral arm.
  • Counter-rotating, low-mass H I tails may be common around local Seyferts; re-observing a sample of such galaxies with similar MeerKAT sensitivity could reveal that cold external accretion is a frequent fuel source, not a rare event.
  • The slightly blue-shifted nuclear H I absorption is consistent with bar rotation, but it could also be a sign of gas moving inward; VLBI observations that resolve the absorption across the radio jets would test whether it traces a genuine nuclear inflow.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents MeerKAT 21-cm H I observations of the nearby Seyfert galaxy NGC5643 and its environment. The authors detect six new low-mass H I sources surrounding the galaxy, resolve the H I disk at multiple resolutions, and report a low-column-density, ~30 kpc tail north of the disk with velocities that appear counter-rotating relative to the regular rotation of the disk. They also identify extraplanar gas (beards) associated with star-forming regions, detect H I absorption in the nuclear region, and compare H I with ALMA CO(2-1) maps. Using a BBarolo tilted-ring model, they subtract a model of the rotating disk and interpret the northern tail as H I accreting onto the disk, possibly feeding the AGN. The paper additionally computes H I deficiency, gas depletion times, and discusses several possible origins for the tail.

Significance. The observational work is technically sound: the data reduction follows established MeerKAT pipelines, and the tail is detected in multiple independently imaged cubes, making the morphological detection robust. The discovery of six new H I companions and a resolved detection of H I in IC4444 are genuinely new and interesting results. If the accretion interpretation is correct, this would be a rare example of resolved cold gas infall onto a Seyfert galaxy, with implications for AGN fueling and replenishment of the star-forming gas reservoir. However, the central interpretive claim of an 'infalling' tail is not uniquely established: the paper itself lists several alternative origins and lacks an independent kinematic or chemical tracer, and the inference relies on a fixed-PA tilted-ring model that is not tested against warped or non-circular disk models. The abstract and conclusions are noticeably stronger than the uncertainties acknowledged in the body.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Section 5] The abstract and the concluding paragraph of Section 5 state as fact that the northern tail 'represents the accretion of H I onto a regularly rotating H I disk,' but Section 4.1 explicitly lists ram-pressure stripping, tidal interactions, a stripped companion dwarf, and halo gas accretion as possible origins, and later states 'we cannot definitively determine the origin of this H I accretion.' The evidence presented—counter-rotation, low H I deficiency, absence of a stellar stream—rules out some alternatives but does not uniquely establish infall. I request that the abstract and conclusions be reworded to present the infall interpretation as a candidate or the most likely scenario, consistent with the body of the paper, or that additional evidence be supplied to justify the stronger claim.
  2. [Section 4.1, Table 4] The tilted-ring model used to define the tail fixes PA=315° and v_sys=1192 km/s for all seven rings (Table 4), fitting only v_rot and inclination as free parameters. The northern tail is then identified from the residual after subtracting this model. If the outer H I disk is warped or has non-circular (e.g., radial) motions, a fixed-PA pure-rotation model would leave a one-sided residual that could be mistaken for a distinct tail. The paper does not test a model with ring-by-ring PA variation or a harmonic decomposition of the velocity field. I recommend adding a quantitative test—for example, freeing PA per ring in BBarolo, or computing a harmonic expansion of the line-of-sight velocity field—to demonstrate that the tail-like residual is not an artifact of the assumed disk geometry. The reported ~250 km/s deviation of the tail from the model is evidence of anomaly, but by itself it does not discriminate between infall and an outer-disk warp or radial flow.
  3. [Section 4.1; Section 3.2] No independent kinematic tracer—such as H I absorption against a background continuum source, stellar velocities, or gas metallicity—confirms that the tail is physically associated with NGC5643 and is moving inward. The paper notes in Section 4.1 that metallicity measurements are lacking, and the tail velocity range (1024–1200 km/s) crosses the systemic velocity, so the spatial and spectral separation between the tail and the regular disk is not clean. Counter-rotation alone does not distinguish infall from a separate companion, tidal debris, or a large-scale outflow. I ask for an explicit discussion of what would falsify the infall scenario, or a targeted search for an independent tracer (e.g., H I absorption toward a background source in the tail direction), before the accretion claim is made in the abstract.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.3] In the text following Eq. (2), the column density is quoted as 'approximately −1×10^20 cm^-2'; the minus sign is almost certainly a typographical error and should be removed.
  2. [Section 4.1] The statement that the tail's velocity 'exceeds the expected rotational velocity by ~250 km/s' is not well defined because the position-velocity cut along the tail is at PA=348°, not along the major axis at PA=315°; the expected disk velocity at that off-major-axis angle should be used for the comparison, which would make the quoted deviation more meaningful.
  3. [Section 3.2, Figure 5] The elevated velocity dispersions at the disk edge are attributed to turbulence in the text, but beam smearing or projection effects from an outer-disk warp could also contribute; a brief discussion of these alternatives would be helpful.
  4. [Throughout] The notation alternates between 'H I' and 'Hi' in the text and figures; please use a single, consistent style (e.g., 'H I' in the main text and 'Hi' only in tables/figures if desired).
  5. [References] The citation to Maccagni et al. (2024) is given as an arXiv e-print; please update it to the published version if one now exists, and likewise check all other preprint citations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the tail is measured directly from the data, and the accretion interpretation is an externally constrained inference, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing claims do not reduce to their inputs. The northern tail's existence, extent, column density, and counter-rotating kinematics are presented as direct observational results: it is detected in all three data cubes, traced in channel maps between 1024 and 1200 km/s, and seen in position-velocity diagrams as feature E. The BBarolo tilted-ring model (Section 4.1, Table 4) is used only to quantify the regular disk and to isolate residual gas for a mass estimate; the model parameters (v_rot, i, fixed PA and v_sys) do not encode the tail's mass, location, or velocity. The comparison 'the tail's velocity exceeds the expected rotational velocity by ~250 km/s' is a falsifiable model-data comparison, not a fitted quantity renamed as a prediction. The accretion interpretation is defended by excluding ram-pressure stripping (via H I deficiency and the Yoon et al. classification) and by noting the absence of stellar streams and the regular rotation of the disk, while the authors explicitly state they cannot definitively determine whether the gas is pristine halo material or stripped from a dwarf. Self-citations to MAGNHIFFIC and previous Maccagni et al. papers are contextual survey/project descriptions, not load-bearing premises, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from them. Model-subtraction dependence is a legitimate robustness concern, but it is not circularity: the residual is an observed excess, not an output that was fitted and then called a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests primarily on the reliability of the BBarolo disk model and on standard H I astronomy assumptions (spin temperature, CO conversion factor, distance). No new physical entities are invented.

free parameters (2)
  • BBarolo fitted rotational velocity per ring (7 values) = 149-174 km/s
    Free parameters in the tilted-ring fit to the H I disk; used to define the rotating disk model subtracted to isolate the northern tail.
  • BBarolo fitted inclination per ring (7 values) = 32-34 degrees
    Free parameters in the same tilted-ring fit; they affect the shape of the model disk and therefore the residual tail definition.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Flat LCDM cosmology with H0=70, Omega_L=0.7, Omega_M=0.3
    Stated at the end of Section 1; used to convert redshifts to distances and physical scales.
  • domain assumption Spin temperature T_s = 100 K for the absorbing H I
    Assumed in Equation 2 to convert optical depth to column density; standard but can vary by an order of magnitude.
  • domain assumption CO-to-H2 conversion factor alpha_CO = 4.35 and R21 = 0.65
    Adopted from Leroy et al. (2021) for the molecular gas mass; affects the H2/H I ratio and depletion time calculations.
  • domain assumption H I deficiency scaling relation from Chung et al. (2009)
    Used to compute def_HI = -0.87, which underpins the argument against ram-pressure stripping.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of MeerKAT Discovery of an Infalling Cold Gas Tail onto the Nearby Barred Spiral Galaxy, NGC 5643." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2QBKEVSU

@misc{pith2026250515983,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: MeerKAT Discovery of an Infalling Cold Gas Tail onto the Nearby Barred Spiral Galaxy, NGC 5643},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2QBKEVSU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.15983}
}
abstract

The detailed study of gas flows in local Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) is essential for understanding the regulation of star formation and black hole growth, which are fundamental to galaxy evolution. One such AGN case study is NGC 5643, a nearby ($D_{L}\sim17.3$ Mpc) star-forming, late-type, Seyfert galaxy, where inflows and outflows have been observed in detail. NGC 5643 has been studied at multiple wavelengths, however, a key missing component is sensitive, high-resolution neutral hydrogen ($\mathrm{H\,I}$) observations. We present 21-cm observations of NGC 5643 with MeerKAT, revealing six low-$\mathrm{H\,I}$ mass ($M_{\text{$\mathrm{H\,I}$}}\sim10^{7} M_\odot$) sources surrounding NGC 5643 and $\mathrm{H\,I}$ in IC 4444, $\sim230$ kpc north of NGC 5643. In NGC 5643, $\mathrm{H\,I}$ extends beyond the stellar disk with several morphological and kinematical asymmetries. North of the disk is an extended 30 kpc tail with counter-rotating velocities. This is $\mathrm{H\,I}$ gas accreting onto the regularly rotating disk of NGC 5643 from the environment. Within the spiral arms of the disk, we identify extraplanar gas components, tracing galactic fountains driven by star formation regions. These fountains have a molecular gas component and show an increased $\mathrm{H}_2$/$\mathrm{H\,I}$ ratio. In the circum-nuclear region, we observe spatially unresolved $\mathrm{H\,I}$ absorption that is slightly blue-shifted ($\sim72$ \kms) with an $\mathrm{H\,I}$ emission counterpart at redshifted velocities. These MeerKAT observations provide a complete census of the $\mathrm{H\,I}$ in and around this nearby Seyfert galaxy, providing missing information on the cold gas flows fuelling the star formation and nuclear activity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.15983 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. VST r-band optical image of NGC 5643 with MeerKAT continuum image contours at 2 𝑛 𝜎 where 𝑛 = 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 𝜎 = 1.32 × 10−5 Jy/beam. The inner contours (where 𝑛 = 4, 5, 6 ) are shown in orange to highlight the bar and spiral arm features of NGC 5643 vis￾ible in the continuum data. The restoring beam of the MeerKAT continuum image is 6.1 ′′ × 5.0 ′′ with a major axis position angle of -42◦ . The spatial scale is … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Optical g-band VST image of NGC 5643 with H i column density contours (3𝜎 over four channels) at [3.1 × 1018 , 1.4 × 1019 , 2.9 × 1020] cm−2 for each cube with resolution 96′′ (red), 30′′ (blue) and 8′′ (green), respectively. The surrounding sources (excluding IC 4444) are detected for the first time with these H i observations. The closest H i cloud to NGC 5643 is ID5, which is ∼ 100 kpc away. The total image area … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Top panel: NGC 5643 H i emission spectrum from the 30′′ cube. An asymmetry is observed between 1000 km s−1 and 1100 km s−1 , correspond￾ing the northern H i tail (E). Bottom panel: H i absorption column density spectrum towards the centre of NGC 5643. The absorption spectrum was ex￾tracted from the central beam (diameter of 664 pc) of the 8′′ data cube. The average rms for the channels in the 8′′ cube is indicated b… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: NGC 5643 intensity map for the 30′′ cube with 3𝜎 and 9𝜎 H i column density contours for each cube. The 96′′ intensity map contour lev￾els are [3.1, 9.3] ×1018 cm−2 (cyan). The 30′′ intensity map contour levels are [1.7, 5.2] ×1019 cm−2 (green). The 8′′ intensity map co…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Kinematics of NGC 5643 from the 30′′ cube. Top: Velocity map (moment 1) centred on the systemic velocity of NGC 5643 (1192 km s−1 ). The contours are from 1100 km s−1 to 1275 km s−1 , increasing in steps of 25 km s−1 . Bottom: Velocity dispersion map (moment 2) of NGC …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Channel maps of 30′′ cube, with the model (Section 4.1) in blue contours at [0.1, 1.0, 10] mJy/beam. The difference between the data and the model (the residual) is shown in red contours at [0.5, 1.0] mJy/beam isolating the tail and other non-rotating gas. The channel …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: NGC 5643 position velocity diagrams, similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The spatial distribution of the H2 −to−H i ratio (𝑅mol) in NGC 5643 with contours at [0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0]. The grey dashed line (PA = 315◦ ) passes through the centre of NGC 5643 and represents the slice used for the position velocity diagram in [P…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

  2. [2]

    Alonso-Herrero A., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aabe30 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...859..144A 859, 144

  3. [3]

    G., et al., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04102.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.322..486B 322, 486

    Barnes D. G., et al., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04102.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.322..486B 322, 486

  4. [4]

    N., Heckman T

    Best P. N., Heckman T. M., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20414.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.421.1569B 421, 1569

  5. [5]

    Capaccioli M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526252 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...581A..10C 581, A10

  6. [6]

    M., Randriamampandry T

    Carignan C., Libert Y., Lucero D. M., Randriamampandry T. H., Jarrett T. H., Oosterloo T. A., Tollerud E. J., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527910 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...587L...3C 587, L3

  7. [7]

    H., Kenney J

    Chung A., van Gorkom J. H., Kenney J. D. P., Crowl H., Vollmer B., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/138/6/1741 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009AJ....138.1741C 138, 1741

  8. [8]

    Combes F., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322288 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...558A.124C 558, A124

Show all 89 references
  1. [9]

    Combes F., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423433 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...565A..97C 565, A97

  2. [10]

    Cresci G., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526581 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...582A..63C 582, A63

  3. [11]

    M., Combes F., Oosterloo T., Oonk J

    Dasyra K. M., Combes F., Oosterloo T., Oonk J. B. R., Morganti R., Salom \'e P., Vlahakis N., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629689 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...595L...7D 595, L7

  4. [12]

    I., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/792/2/101 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...792..101D 792, 101

    Davies R. I., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/792/2/101 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...792..101D 792, 101

  5. [13]

    Dey A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....157..168D 157, 168

  6. [14]

    M., Fraternali F., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1213 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.451.3021D 451, 3021

    Di Teodoro E. M., Fraternali F., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1213 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.451.3021D 451, 3021

  7. [15]

    L., Catinella B., Cortese L., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1247 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.478.3447E 478, 3447

    Ellison S. L., Catinella B., Cortese L., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1247 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.478.3447E 478, 3447

  8. [16]

    Emonts B. H. C., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16706.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.406..987E 406, 987

  9. [17]

    430, Gas Accretion onto Galaxies

    Fraternali F., 2017, in Fox A., Dav \'e R., eds, Astrophysics and Space Science Library Vol. 430, Gas Accretion onto Galaxies. p. 323 ( @eprint arXiv 1612.00477 ), @doi 10.1007/978-3-319-52512-9_14

  10. [18]

    Fraternali F., van Moorsel G., Sancisi R., Oosterloo T., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/340358 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AJ....123.3124F 123, 3124

  11. [19]

    F., Baum S

    Gallimore J. F., Baum S. A., O'Dea C. P., Pedlar A., Brinks E., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/307853 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...524..684G 524, 684

  12. [20]

    Garc \' a-Bernete I., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038256 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...645A..21G 645, A21

  13. [21]

    M., Morganti R., Oosterloo T

    Ger \'e b K., Maccagni F. M., Morganti R., Oosterloo T. A., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201424655 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...575A..44G 575, A44

  14. [22]

    M., Costa T., Tadhunter C

    Harrison C. M., Costa T., Tadhunter C. N., Fl \"u tsch A., Kakkad D., Perna M., Vietri G., 2018, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-018-0403-6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018NatAs...2..198H 2, 198

  15. [23]

    Heald G., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1698 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462.1238H 462, 1238

  16. [24]

    M., Jarrett T

    Hess K. M., Jarrett T. H., Carignan C., Passmoor S. S., Goedhart S., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1372 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.452.1617H 452, 1617

  17. [25]

    F., Hernquist L., Cox T

    Hopkins P. F., Hernquist L., Cox T. J., Di Matteo T., Martini P., Robertson B., Springel V., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/432438 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...630..705H 630, 705

  18. [26]

    F., Torrey P., Faucher-Gigu \`e re C.-A., Quataert E., Murray N., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw289 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.458..816H 458, 816

    Hopkins P. F., Torrey P., Faucher-Gigu \`e re C.-A., Quataert E., Murray N., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw289 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.458..816H 458, 816

  19. [27]

    J., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abfe5a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...915...34H 915, 34

    Hoyt T. J., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abfe5a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...915...34H 915, 34

  20. [28]

    Ianjamasimanana R., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac936 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.513.2019I 513, 2019

  21. [29]

    Iodice E., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/820/1/42 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...820...42I 820, 42

  22. [30]

    Iodice E., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6846 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...839...21I 839, 21

  23. [31]

    E., Oey M

    Jaskot A. E., Oey M. S., Salzer J. J., Van Sistine A., Bell E. F., Haynes M. P., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/808/1/66 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...808...66J 808, 66

  24. [32]

    H., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15338.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.399..683J 399, 683

    Jones D. H., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15338.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.399..683J 399, 683

  25. [33]

    J \'o zsa G. I. G., et al., 2020, in Pizzo R., Deul E. R., Mol J. D., de Plaa J., Verkouter H., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 527, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXIX. p. 635 ( @eprint arXiv 2006.02955 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.2...

  26. [34]

    S., Smirnov O

    Kenyon J. S., Smirnov O. M., Grobler T. L., Perkins S. J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1221 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.478.2399K 478, 2399

  27. [35]

    H., Dav \'e R., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09451.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.363....2K 363, 2

    Kere s D., Katz N., Weinberg D. H., Dav \'e R., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09451.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.363....2K 363, 2

  28. [36]

    G., Ponman T

    Khosroshahi H. G., Ponman T. J., Jones L. R., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11591.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.377..595K 377, 595

  29. [37]

    Kleiner D., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039898 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...648A..32K 648, A32

  30. [38]

    S., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/421744 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AJ....128...16K 128, 16

    Koribalski B. S., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/421744 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AJ....128...16K 128, 16

  31. [39]

    J., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134024 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ARA&A..42..603K 42, 603

    Kormendy J., Kennicutt Robert C. J., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134024 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ARA&A..42..603K 42, 603

  32. [40]

    B., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa76db , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...843...16K 843, 16

    Kourkchi E., Tully R. B., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa76db , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...843...16K 843, 16

  33. [41]

    Lang P., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9953 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...897..122L 897, 122

  34. [42]

    Leipski C., Falcke H., Bennert N., H \"u ttemeister S., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20054311 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...455..161L 455, 161

  35. [43]

    K., Walter F., Brinks E., Bigiel F., de Blok W

    Leroy A. K., Walter F., Brinks E., Bigiel F., de Blok W. J. G., Madore B., Thornley M. D., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2782 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ....136.2782L 136, 2782

  36. [44]

    K., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac17f3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJS..257...43L 257, 43

    Leroy A. K., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac17f3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJS..257...43L 257, 43

  37. [45]

    Maccagni F., Morganti R., Oosterloo T., Mahony E., 2014, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 571, A67

  38. [46]

    M., Morganti R., Oosterloo T

    Maccagni F. M., Morganti R., Oosterloo T. A., Ger \'e b K., Maddox N., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201730563 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...604A..43M 604, A43

  39. [47]

    M., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936867 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...634A...9M 634, A9

    Maccagni F. M., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936867 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...634A...9M 634, A9

  40. [48]

    M., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141143 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...656A..45M 656, A45

    Maccagni F. M., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141143 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...656A..45M 656, A45

  41. [49]

    M., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346521 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...675A..59M 675, A59

    Maccagni F. M., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346521 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...675A..59M 675, A59

  42. [50]

    M., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2405.17000 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240517000M p

    Maccagni F. M., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2405.17000 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240517000M p. arXiv:2405.17000

  43. [51]

    J., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07710.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.350.1195M 350, 1195

    Meyer M. J., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07710.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.350.1195M 350, 1195

  44. [52]

    Mingozzi M., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834372 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...622A.146M 622, A146

  45. [53]

    Morganti R., Oosterloo T., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s00159-018-0109-x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&ARv..26....4M 26, 4

  46. [54]

    Morganti R., Oosterloo T., Tsvetanov Z., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/300236 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998AJ....115..915M 115, 915

  47. [55]

    N., Oosterloo T

    Morganti R., Tadhunter C. N., Oosterloo T. A., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200500197 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...444L...9M 444, L9

  48. [56]

    B., Oosterloo T

    Morganti R., Peck A. B., Oosterloo T. A., van Moorsel G., Capetti A., Fanti R., Parma P., de Ruiter H. R., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200912605 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...505..559M 505, 559

  49. [57]

    Morganti R., Frieswijk W., Oonk R. J. B., Oosterloo T., Tadhunter C., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220734 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...552L...4M 552, L4

  50. [58]

    Morganti R., Oosterloo T., Oonk J. B. R., Frieswijk W., Tadhunter C., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201525860 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...580A...1M 580, A1

  51. [59]

    S., Taylor K., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/216.2.193 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985MNRAS.216..193M 216, 193

    Morris S., Ward M., Whittle M., Wilson A. S., Taylor K., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/216.2.193 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985MNRAS.216..193M 216, 193

  52. [60]

    Namumba B., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1524 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.505.3795N 505, 3795

  53. [61]

    R., van de Gronde J

    Offringa A. R., van de Gronde J. J., Roerdink J. B. T. M., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201118497 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...539A..95O 539, A95

  54. [62]

    R., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1368 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.444..606O 444, 606

    Offringa A. R., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1368 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.444..606O 444, 606

  55. [63]

    A., Morganti R., Tzioumis A., Reynolds J., King E., McCulloch P., Tsvetanov Z., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/301358 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000AJ....119.2085O 119, 2085

    Oosterloo T. A., Morganti R., Tzioumis A., Reynolds J., King E., McCulloch P., Tsvetanov Z., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/301358 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000AJ....119.2085O 119, 2085

  56. [64]

    Oosterloo T., Fraternali F., Sancisi R., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/520332 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007AJ....134.1019O 134, 1019

  57. [65]

    Pan H.-A., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac474f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...927....9P 927, 9

  58. [66]

    C., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-021820-120014 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ARA&A..58..363P 58, 363

    P \'e roux C., Howk J. C., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-021820-120014 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ARA&A..58..363P 58, 363

  59. [67]

    M., GASP Team 2023, in Wong T., Kim W.-T., eds, IAU Symposium Vol

    Poggianti B. M., GASP Team 2023, in Wong T., Kim W.-T., eds, IAU Symposium Vol. 373, Resolving the Rise and Fall of Star Formation in Galaxies. pp 163--172 ( @eprint arXiv 2211.12297 ), @doi 10.1017/S1743921322004884

  60. [68]

    M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature23462 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Natur.548..304P 548, 304

    Poggianti B. M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature23462 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Natur.548..304P 548, 304

  61. [69]

    H., Schechter P., 1974, @doi [ ] 10.1086/152650 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974ApJ...187..425P 187, 425

    Press W. H., Schechter P., 1974, @doi [ ] 10.1086/152650 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974ApJ...187..425P 187, 425

  62. [70]

    L., Moretti A., Bettoni D., Gullieuszik M., Vulcani B., Fritz J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz809 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.486..486R 486, 486

    Radovich M., Poggianti B., Jaff \'e Y. L., Moretti A., Bettoni D., Gullieuszik M., Vulcani B., Fritz J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz809 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.486..486R 486, 486

  63. [71]

    Rodr \' guez Montero F., Dav \'e R., Wild V., Angl \'e s-Alc \'a zar D., Narayanan D., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2580 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.490.2139R 490, 2139

  64. [72]

    H., Lockhart I

    Rogstad D. H., Lockhart I. A., Wright M. C. H., 1974, @doi [ ] 10.1086/153164 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974ApJ...193..309R 193, 309

  65. [73]

    A., Combes F., Hamer S., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731429 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...608A..98S 608, A98

    Salom \'e Q., Salom \'e P., Miville-Desch \^e nes M. A., Combes F., Hamer S., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731429 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...608A..98S 608, A98

  66. [74]

    Sancisi R., Fraternali F., Oosterloo T., van der Hulst T., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s00159-008-0010-0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&ARv..15..189S 15, 189

  67. [75]

    Santoro F., Oonk J. B. R., Morganti R., Oosterloo T. A., Tadhunter C., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628353 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...590A..37S 590, A37

  68. [76]

    E., Sancisi R., Swaters R

    Schaap W. E., Sancisi R., Swaters R. A., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0003165 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...356L..49S 356, L49

  69. [77]

    Serra P., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346071 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...673A.146S 673, A146

  70. [78]

    Spavone M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629111 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...603A..38S 603, A38

  71. [79]

    A., Morganti R., Saripalli L., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014355 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...515A..67S 515, A67

    Struve C., Oosterloo T. A., Morganti R., Saripalli L., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014355 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...515A..67S 515, A67

  72. [80]

    K., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346318 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...676A.113S 676, A113

    Stuber S. K., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346318 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...676A.113S 676, A113

  73. [81]

    Venhola A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935231 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...625A.143V 625, A143

  74. [82]

    Venturi G., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039869 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...648A..17V 648, A17

  75. [83]

    Veronese S., de Blok W. J. G., Walter F., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245423 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...672A..55V 672, A55

  76. [84]

    J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346075 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...676A..67W 676, A67

    Watkins E. J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346075 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...676A..67W 676, A67

  77. [85]

    Westmeier T., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1881 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.506.3962W 506, 3962

  78. [86]

    L., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6579 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...838...81Y 838, 81

    Yoon H., Chung A., Smith R., Jaff \'e Y. L., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6579 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...838...81Y 838, 81

  79. [87]

    de Blok W. J. G., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423880 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...569A..68D 569, A68

  80. [88]

    de Blok W. J. G., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348297 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...688A.109D 688, A109

  81. [89]

    H., Knapp G

    van Gorkom J. H., Knapp G. R., Ekers R. D., Ekers D. D., Laing R. A., Polk K. S., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/115016 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989AJ.....97..708V 97, 708

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.