Microcanonical cascades and random homeomorphisms

Xinxin Chen; Yanqi Qiu; Yong Han; Zipeng Wang

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 42 references

Microcanonical cascades and random homeomorphisms

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The Fourier dimension of every microcanonical cascade measure is almost surely a fixed constant set by the second moment of its splitting weights.

desk verdict A serious, likely correct solution to a named 1976/1993 problem, but the proof leans on two unverified imports from the authors' companion paper; referee it with those imports checked. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.16405 v2 pith:YESIIQ55 submitted 2025-05-22 math.PR math.FA

Xinxin Chen , Yong Han , Yanqi Qiu , Zipeng Wang This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.PRmath.FA MSC 60G5742A6146B0960J8060G46

keywords MandelbrotmicrocanonicalcascadesFourierdimensionvector-valuedmartingalesHölderregularityofrandomhomeomorphismsbranchingwalksMandelbrot-KahaneproblemFrostmanDubins-Freedman

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper solves the Mandelbrot-Kahane problem for microcanonical cascade measures, showing that their Fourier dimension is almost surely a deterministic constant $D_F$ rather than a random or distribution-dependent quantity. The value depends only on the second moments of the two splitting weights, so the result is a single closed formula for an entire family of random fractal measures. The Fourier dimension controls the high-frequency decay of the measure's Fourier transform, so knowing it exactly says how harmonically spread out these turbulence-inspired measures are. The same analysis yields sharp upper and lower Frostman exponents and, as a consequence, sharp Hölder exponents for the associated Dubins-Freedman random homeomorphism and its inverse.

What carries the argument

The proof runs on two martingales. The first is the $\ell^q$-valued martingale $M_n=(s^\alpha \widehat{\mu}_n(s))_{s\geq1}$ of weighted Fourier coefficients of the approximating measures; its $L^2(\ell^q)$ bound is obtained by applying the martingale type-2 inequality for $\ell^q$ ($q>2$) twice, once globally and once conditionally on the dyadic decomposition, reducing the problem to a geometric sum whose ratio is $(\mathbb{E}[W_0^2]+\mathbb{E}[W_1^2])2^{2\alpha+2/q}<1$. The second is the non-negative martingale $M^{(2)}_n=(8\mathbb{E}[W_0^2])^{-n}\sum_{|u|=n}\prod_{j=1}^n X(u|_j)^2$, whose limit is shown to be positive almost surely by combining the branching random walk martingale convergence theorem with a new entropy-type monotonicity of $K_V(p)=\log((\mathbb{E}[V_0^p+V_1^p])^{1/p})$ on $[1,2]$ for two-dimensional splitting vectors. These two mechanisms are linked by the identity $\widehat{\mu}_\infty(2^n)=2^{-n}\sum_{|u|=n}(\prod_{j=1}^n X(u|_j))\widehat{\mu}^{(u)}_\infty(1)$, which expresses dyadic Fourier coefficients as weighted sums of i.i.d. boundary copies and feeds the conditional central limit theorem that pins down the optimal exponent.

What would settle it

Simulate the cascade for the uniform splitting rule $W=(U,1-U)$ with $U$ uniform on $(0,1)$, where $D_F=\log_2(3/2)\approx0.585$, and estimate the decay exponent of $|\widehat{\mu}_\infty(\xi)|$ for large real frequencies $\xi$; a statistically robust exponent differing from $0.585$ would refute the claimed almost-sure formula.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is the almost sure equality $\dim_F(\mu_\infty)=D_F$, where $\mu_\infty$ is the Mandelbrot microcanonical cascade measure on $[0,1]$ and $D_F=\log_2(1/(\mathbb{E}[W_0^2]+\mathbb{E}[W_1^2]))$, under the standing assumptions $W_0+W_1=1$ and $\mathbb{E}[W_0]=\mathbb{E}[W_1]=1/2$. The lower bound $\dim_F(\mu_\infty)\geq D_F$ follows from a vector-valued martingale estimate showing that $\sum_{n\geq1} (|n|^{D_F/2-\varepsilon}|\widehat{\mu}_\infty(n)|)^q$ has finite expectation for some $q>2$, which forces the Fourier coefficients to decay faster than $|n|^{-D_F/2+\varepsilon}$ almost surely. The matching upper bound $\dim_F(\mu_\infty)\leq D_F$ comes from the dyadic self-similarity of the measure: the rescaled coefficients $2^{nD_F/2}\widehat{\mu}_\infty(2^n)$ converge in distribution to the product of a non-degenerate complex Gaussian and the square root of a positive martingale limit, so no exponent above $D_F$ can hold. Along the way the paper proves the Frostman regularity exponents $\gamma_o^+$ and $\gamma_o^-$ are sharp, which yields sharp bi-Hölder regularity for the Dubins-Freedman random homeomorphism $F_\infty$ and its inverse.

Load-bearing premise

The proof leans on two technical results imported from the authors' earlier companion paper — one that turns decay at integer frequencies into a lower bound on the full Fourier dimension, and one that supplies a central limit theorem for sums of random pieces — and the exact formula holds only if both apply to microcanonical cascades as stated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The Mandelbrot-Kahane problem for microcanonical cascades is closed: the Fourier dimension is exactly $D_F$, almost surely, for every admissible splitting law.
Because $D_F$ depends only on $\mathbb{E}[W_0^2]$, two microcanonical cascades with the same second moment of the splitting weights share the same Fourier dimension no matter how different their higher-order structure is.
The upper-bound argument shows that the correlation dimension and the Fourier dimension coincide almost surely for this family, since the paper cites the equality $D_2(\mu_\infty)=D_F$ as an alternative route to the same exponent.
For the uniform splitting rule $W=(U,1-U)$ with $U$ uniform on $(0,1)$, the formula reads $D_F=\log_2(3/2)\approx0.585$, giving a concrete numerical prediction for the Fourier decay of the corresponding random homeomorphism.
The sharp Hölder exponents $\gamma_o^+$ and $(\gamma_o^-)^{-1}$ for $F_\infty$ and $F_\infty^{-1}$ mean the bi-Hölder regularity of Dubins-Freedman random homeomorphisms is now exactly known for all admissible weight vectors.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural extension would replace the binary tree by a $b$-ary tree; the same martingale arguments should give $D_F^{(b)}=\log_b(1/(b\mathbb{E}[W_0^2]))$ for $b$-ary microcanonical cascades, provided the two imported lemmas carry over.
The entropy-type monotonicity that underpins the positivity of the martingale limit is special to two-dimensional splitting vectors, and the paper notes the corresponding inequality fails in high dimension; exact Fourier-dimension formulas for cascades with three or more children will likely need a qualitatively different proof.
The inequality $\gamma_o^+>D_F/2$ noted in the paper means these measures always have a Frostman regularity strictly better than half their Fourier dimension, so their geometric and harmonic scaling behaviours are genuinely different.
The sharp bi-Hölder control suggests the uniform-splitting Dubins-Freedman homeomorphisms may achieve the optimal rate for accelerating Fourier series convergence by a random change of variable, a direction the paper mentions but does not pursue.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

What you should know first: this paper almost certainly solves the Mandelbrot-Kahane problem for microcanonical cascade measures, giving the exact Fourier dimension D_F and sharp Holder exponents for Dubins-Freedman homeomorphisms. Those are real, new results, not repackaged earlier work. The canonical-cascade solution in the authors' companion paper is a different class, and the transfer to microcanonical cascades requires genuinely new arguments, most notably the entropy-type monotonicity lemma (Prop 3.1) which is clean and independently interesting.

The internal proof is largely coherent. The martingale-type estimates in Section 4 are carefully done; the fluctuation analysis in Section 5 is plausible; and I checked the internal computations for Lemmas 4.2, 5.1, 5.4, and 5.6, which look consistent. Lemma 5.6 via Biggins is a proper application. So the concern is not sloppy math in the parts that are actually shown.

The soft spot is exactly where the reader's report and the stress-test note point: two load-bearing black-box imports from [CHQW24a]. Section 6 converts the integer-frequency decay of Proposition 1.4 into a full real-line Fourier dimension lower bound via [CHQW24a, Lemma 1.8 or Remark 1.2]. That transfer is not a trivial consequence of the displayed estimates; decay along integers does not automatically imply decay at all real frequencies unless some regularity or non-atomicity is controlled. The paper does not reproduce or verify that lemma, so the lower-bound half of Theorem 1.1 is not self-contained. The second import, Proposition A.3's conditional Lindeberg-Feller CLT, is used to get the nonzero limiting law; I expect it is fine, but it is also not checkable from this text alone.

There are minor formal blemishes: the proof of Lemma 4.2 drops the s^alpha factor in a display, and the sharpness statement in Proposition 1.2 is awkward when gamma_-o is infinite. Neither appears to break the main theorem.

Who is this for? Specialists in random measures, Fourier dimension, and branching random walks. A reader who wants a fully self-contained proof will be frustrated, but the result is important enough that the companion lemmas should be verified rather than assumed.

Recommendation: send to peer review. The referee should have access to [CHQW24a] and be explicitly asked to check Lemma 1.8 and Proposition A.3 against the microcanonical setting. If they hold, this is publishable as a major result.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Fourier dimension of Mandelbrot microcanonical cascade measures on [0,1]. For a splitting vector (W_0,W_1) with positive entries, mean 1/2, and W_0 not identically 1/2, the authors define D_F = log_2(1/(E[W_0^2]+E[W_1^2])) and prove in Theorem 1.1 that, almost surely, dim_F(mu_infinity) = D_F. The proof combines an L^2(ell^q) vector-valued martingale estimate for the integer Fourier coefficients (Proposition 1.4), a dyadic-subsequence fluctuation theorem for the rescaled coefficients (Proposition 1.5), and a transfer lemma from integer-frequency decay to real-frequency Fourier dimension. The paper also establishes Frostman regularity bounds and sharp Holder exponents for the associated Dubins-Freedman random homeomorphism (Proposition 1.2 and Corollary 1.3).

Significance. If the proof is fully justified, the paper resolves the microcanonical version of the Mandelbrot-Kahane problem with an exact, parameter-free formula for the almost-sure Fourier dimension. The internal estimates are mostly careful and substantial: the entropy-type monotonicity lemma (Proposition 3.1) is elegant, the martingale type-2 arguments in Section 4 are coherent, and the branching random walk arguments in Section 5 are applied with the correct normalizations. The paper also gives sharp Frostman and Holder statements for the Dubins-Freedman homeomorphism. The main weakness is that two load-bearing results are imported from the authors' companion preprint [CHQW24a] without statements or proofs, so the present text alone does not certify the full theorem.

major comments (2)

[Section 6, proof of Theorem 1.1] The lower bound dim_F(mu_infinity) >= D_F - 2*epsilon is obtained by citing [CHQW24a, Lemma 1.8 or Remark 1.2] after Proposition 1.4 gives decay of the integer Fourier coefficients. This transfer is load-bearing and is not a formal consequence of the displayed estimates: controlling |hat mu(n)| for integer n does not by itself control |hat mu(xi)| for real xi, and endpoint atoms or other hypotheses would matter. Please state the lemma explicitly, verify its hypotheses for mu_infinity (in particular non-atomicity at {0,1} and any regularity or aperiodicity condition), and either prove it or give the precise statement with a proof in an appendix.
[Section 5.4, proof of Proposition 1.5] The conditional Lindeberg-Feller central limit theorem is imported as [CHQW24a, Proposition A.3] without statement. The array used here is conditioned on F_n, which varies with n, and the conclusion requires that the limiting complex Gaussian be independent of M_infty^(2). Please reproduce the proposition and confirm that the hypotheses checked in Lemmas 5.7 and 5.8 (the supremum of Y(u) tending to zero and the conditional Lindeberg condition (5.23)) are exactly the hypotheses of that CLT, and clarify whether the conditional variance is required to converge in probability or almost surely.

minor comments (5)

[Section 5.4, paragraph after Lemma 5.4] In the two displayed identities after 'Thus', the first identity writes E[(Re V_n)^2 | F_n] = (rho+varpi)/2 * M_infty^(2); the subscript should be n, not infinity, to match the second identity and Lemma 5.4.
[Proposition 1.4 and Eq. (4.1)] The displayed expectation appears to place the exponent 2/q outside the expectation, whereas the proof and the equality with the L^2(ell^q)-norm require E[ ( sum_s |s^{D_F/2-epsilon} hat mu_infinity(s)|^q )^{2/q} ]. Please correct the typesetting and specify that the sum is over nonzero integers, or use s >= 1 together with the symmetry of the Fourier coefficients.
[Section 3, remark after Proposition 3.1] The claim that inequality (3.2) fails for d >= 17 is presented without data or a reference. Since this remark is not used in the paper, either provide the numerical experiment or delete the claim.
[Proof of Proposition 3.1] The interpolation step is described as 'standard complex interpolation', but the norm varies in both the L^p and ell^p components. Please add a sentence or a reference explaining why the complex interpolation of L^{p0}(ell^{p0}) and L^{p1}(ell^{p1}) is L^{p_theta}(ell^{p_theta}).
[Throughout] There are minor typos, including 'determing' in the abstract, and the phrase 'determing their exact Fourier dimensions' should read 'determining'. The formatting of some displayed formulas is also broken, notably in Proposition 1.4 and Lemma 4.4, and should be corrected during production.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation: D_F is a genuinely derived exponent; the only caveat is load-bearing reliance on the authors' companion paper [CHQW24a], which is a dependency rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

Theorem 1.1's Fourier dimension D_F is an explicit function of the second moment of the splitting weights, not a parameter fitted to μ∞ nor a re-parameterization of the target quantity. The lower bound is produced by a self-contained vector-valued martingale argument (Proposition 1.4) proving weighted ℓ^q summability of integer Fourier coefficients at exponent D_F/2−ε, and the upper bound is produced by a conditional CLT (Proposition 1.5) showing that the rescaled dyadic coefficients 2^{nD_F/2} μ∞(2^n) fluctuate with a non-degenerate limit, so no faster decay is possible. The internal computations (Lemmas 4.2, 4.3, 5.1, 5.4, 5.6 and the entropy inequality of Proposition 3.1) are genuine derivations from the cascade construction. The sole caveat is that two steps are imported from the authors' companion paper [CHQW24a]: the transfer from integer-frequency decay to full real-line Fourier dimension in Section 6 relies on [CHQW24a, Lemma 1.8 or Remark 1.2], and the conditional Lindeberg-Feller CLT in Section 5.4 relies on [CHQW24a, Proposition A.3]. These are omitted proofs and load-bearing dependencies, but they are not shown by the text to be restatements of the present theorem, fitted inputs, or definitions in disguise. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input, and no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction. Accordingly the circularity score is low, reflecting the dependency caveat rather than any demonstrated circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters fitted to data and no new physical or mathematical entities; it derives a formula from the prescribed random vector W. The main external load is carried by standard branching-random-walk and martingale-type theorems plus two lemmas from the authors' companion paper.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption W=(W0,W1) has positive coordinates, W0+W1=1 a.s., E[W0]=E[W1]=1/2, and W0 is not identically 1/2.
Statement (1.1) fixes the class of microcanonical cascades; all subsequent quantities D_F, gamma_+o, gamma_-o are defined from this W.
standard math Pisier's martingale type-2 inequality for l^q with q>=2.
Used twice in Section 4.2 and in the proof of Proposition 1.4 to control the vector-valued martingale of Fourier coefficients.
standard math Biggins' branching random walk theorems: martingale convergence and minimal-displacement asymptotics.
Lemma 5.6 relies on [Shi95, Theorem 3.2]; Lemma 5.7 and Proposition 1.2 rely on [Shi95, Theorem 1.3] and [Big98, Theorem 3].
domain assumption Companion lemmas from CHQW24a: Lemma 1.8/Remark 1.2 and Proposition A.3.
The proof assumes the authors' earlier canonical-cascade framework, including its integer-to-real Fourier dimension transfer and its conditional CLT, applies unchanged to microcanonical cascades; these are not proved here.
standard math Complex interpolation theorem for L^p spaces.
Used in Proposition 3.1 to prove convexity of f_V(t)=K_V(1/t).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Microcanonical cascades and random homeomorphisms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YESIIQ55

@misc{pith2026250516405,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Microcanonical cascades and random homeomorphisms},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YESIIQ55}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.16405}
}

read the original abstract

We give a complete solution to the Mandelbrot-Kahane problem for the microcanonical cascade measures by determing their exact Fourier dimensions. We also discuss the Frostman regularity as well as the bi-H\"older continuity of the Dubins-Freedman random homeomorphisms.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

[1]

Random conformal weldings

Kari Astala, Peter Jones, Antti Kupiainen, and Eero Saksman. Random conformal weldings. Acta Math. , 207(2):203--254, 2011

work page 2011
[2]

Critical mandelbrot cascades

Julien Barral, Antti Kupiainen, Miika Nikula, Eero Saksman and Christian Webb. Critical mandelbrot cascades. Comm. Math. Phys. , 325: 685-711, 2014

work page 2014
[3]

Continuity of the multifractal spectrum of a random statistically self-similar measure, J

Julien Barral. Continuity of the multifractal spectrum of a random statistically self-similar measure, J. Theoretic. Probab. , 13, 1027–1060, 2000

work page 2000
[4]

Generalized vector multiplicative cascades

Julien Barral. Generalized vector multiplicative cascades. Adv. Appl. Probab. , vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 874--895, 2001

work page 2001
[5]

Multifractal analysis of complex random cascades

Julien Barral and Xiong Jin. Multifractal analysis of complex random cascades. Comm. Math. Phys. , 297, no. 1, 129–168, 2010

work page 2010
[6]

Uniform convergence for complex [0,1]-martingales

Julien Barral, Xiong Jin and Benoit B Mandelbrot. Uniform convergence for complex [0,1]-martingales. Ann. Appl. Probab. , 20(4): 1205–1218, 2010

work page 2010
[7]

Convergence of complex multiplicative cascades

Julien Barral, Xiong Jin and Benoit B Mandelbrot. Convergence of complex multiplicative cascades. Ann. Appl. Probab. , 20(4): 1219-1252, 2010

work page 2010
[8]

Introduction to infinite products of independent random functions ( R andom multiplicative multifractal measures

Julien Barral and Beno\^ i t Mandelbrot. Introduction to infinite products of independent random functions ( R andom multiplicative multifractal measures. I ). In Fractal geometry and applications: a jubilee of B eno\^ i t M andelbrot, P art 2 . Volume 72 of Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. , pages 3--16, AMS, 2004

work page 2004

Show all 42 references

[9]

Non-degeneracy, moments, dimension, and multifractal analysis for random multiplicative measures ( R andom multiplicative multifractal measures

Julien Barral and Beno\^ i t Mandelbrot. Non-degeneracy, moments, dimension, and multifractal analysis for random multiplicative measures ( R andom multiplicative multifractal measures. II ). In Fractal geometry and applications: a jubilee of B eno\^ i t M andelbrot, P art 2 ,...

2004
[10]

Mesures al\' e atoires de M andelbrot associ\' e es \`a des substitutions

Fathi Ben Nasr. Mesures al\' e atoires de M andelbrot associ\' e es \`a des substitutions. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S\' e r. I Math. , 304(10):255--258, 1987

1987
[11]

o ran Bergh and J\

J\" o ran Bergh and J\" o rgen L\" o fstr\" o m. Interpolation spaces. A n introduction . Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, No. 223. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1976

1976
[12]

John D. Biggins. Lindley-type equations in the branching random walk. Stoch. Proc. Appl. , 75:105–133, 1998

1998
[13]

Harmonic analysis of mandelbrot cascades -- in the context of vector-valued martingales

Xinxin Chen, Yong Han, Yanqi Qiu, and Zipeng Wang. Harmonic analysis of mandelbrot cascades -- in the context of vector-valued martingales. arXiv 2409.13164 , 09 2024

2024 arXiv
[14]

The Mandelbrot-Kahane problem of Beno\^ i t Mandelbrot model of turbulence

Xinxin Chen, Yong Han, Yanqi Qiu, and Zipeng Wang. The Mandelbrot-Kahane problem of Beno\^ i t Mandelbrot model of turbulence. Comptes Rendus Math\'ematique. Acad\'emie des Sciences . Paris, 363, 35–41
[15]

Dubins and David A

Lester E. Dubins and David A. Freedman. Random distribution functions. In Proc. F ifth B erkeley S ympos. M ath. S tatist. and P robability ( B erkeley, C alif., 1965/66), V ol. II : C ontributions to P robability T heory, P art 1 , pages 183--214. Univ. California Press, Berk...

1965
[16]

Richard Durrett and Thomas M. Liggett. Fixed points of the smoothing transformation. Z. Wahrsch. Verw. Gebiete 64 (1983), no. 3, 275–301

1983
[17]

On M arkov- M andelbrot martingales

Ai Hua Fan. On M arkov- M andelbrot martingales. J. Math. Pures. Appl. (9) , 81(10):967--982, 2002

2002
[18]

Gilbert, Walter Willinger

Anja Feldmann, Anna C. Gilbert, Walter Willinger. Data networks as cascades: Investigating the multifractal nature of Internet WAN traffic. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review , 1998, 28(4): 42-55

1998
[19]

Gilbert, Walter Willinger and Anja Feldmann

Anna C. Gilbert, Walter Willinger and Anja Feldmann. Scaling analysis of conservative cascades, with applications to network traffic. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory , 45(3):971--991, 1999

1999
[20]

Daniel Mauldin and Stanley C

Siegfried Graf, R. Daniel Mauldin and Stanley C. Williams. Random homeomorphisms. Adv. Math. , 60(3):239--359, 1986

1986
[21]

Vijay Gupta and Edward C. Waymire. Multiscaling properties of spatial rainfall and river flow disitributions. Journal of Geophysical Research , 95(D3), 1999-2009, 1990

1999
[22]

Richard Holley and Edward C. Waymire. Multifractal dimensions and scaling exponents for strongly bounded random cascades. Ann. Appl. Probab. , 2(4):819--845, 1992

1992
[23]

Sur certaines martingales de B enoit M andelbrot

Jean-Pierre Kahane and Jacque Peyri \`e re. Sur certaines martingales de B enoit M andelbrot. Adv. Math. , 22(2):131--145, 1976

1976
[24]

Sur le chaos multiplicatif

Jean-Pierre Kahane. Sur le chaos multiplicatif. Ann. Sci. Math. Qu\' e bec , 9(2):105--150, 1985

1985
[25]

Positive martingales and random measures

Jean-Pierre Kahane. Positive martingales and random measures. Chinese Ann. Math. Ser. B , 8(1):1--12, 1987. A Chinese summary appears in Chinese Ann. Math. Ser. A 8 (1987), no. 1, 136

1987
[26]

Fractals and random measures

Jean-Pierre Kahane. Fractals and random measures. Bull. Sci. Math. , 117(1):153--159, 1993

1993
[27]

Random homeomorphisms and F ourier expansions

Gady Kozma and Alexander Olevski . Random homeomorphisms and F ourier expansions. Geom. Funct. Anal. , 8(6):1016--1042, 1998

1998
[28]

Luzin's problem on F ourier convergence and homeomorphisms

Gady Kozma and Alexander Olevski . Luzin's problem on F ourier convergence and homeomorphisms. Tr. Mat. Inst. Steklova , 319:134--181, 2022

2022
[29]

Homeomorphisms and F ourier expansion

Gady Kozma and Alexander Olevski . Homeomorphisms and F ourier expansion. Real Anal. Exchange , 48(2):237--250, 2023

2023
[30]

Harmonic analysis of multiplicative chaos Part I: the proof of Garban-Vargas conjecture for 1D GMC

Zhaofeng Lin, Yanqi Qiu, and Mingjie Tan. Harmonic analysis of multiplicative chaos Part I: the proof of Garban-Vargas conjecture for 1D GMC. arXiv preprint , arXiv: 2411.13923v2, 2025

2025 arXiv
[31]

Harmonic analysis of multiplicative chaos Part II: a unified approach to Fourier dimensions

Zhaofeng Lin, Yanqi Qiu, and Mingjie Tan. Harmonic analysis of multiplicative chaos Part II: a unified approach to Fourier dimensions. arXiv preprint , arXiv:2505.03298v3, 2025

2025 arXiv
[32]

On generalized multiplicative cascades

Quansheng Liu. On generalized multiplicative cascades. Stochastic Process. Appl. 86 (2000), no. 2, 263–286

2000
[33]

Mandelbrot

Benoit B. Mandelbrot. Intermittent turbulence in self-similar cascades: divergence of high moments and dimension of the carrier. Journal of Fluid Mechanics , 62(2):331--358, 1974

1974
[34]

Mandelbrot

Benoit B. Mandelbrot. Intermittent turbulence and fractal dimension: kurtosis and the spectral exponent 5/3+B. Lecture Notes in Math. , Vol. 565, pp. 121--145, Springer, 1976

1976
[35]

Mandelbrot

Benoit B. Mandelbrot. Fractals and scaling in finance . Selected Works of Benoit B. Mandelbrot. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997

1997
[36]

Mandelbrot

Benoit B. Mandelbrot. Multifractals and 1/f noise . Selected Works of Benoit B. Mandelbrot. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999

1999
[37]

Scaling exponents and multifractal dimensions for independent random cascades

George Molchan. Scaling exponents and multifractal dimensions for independent random cascades. Comm. Math. Phys. , 179(3):681–702, 1996

1996
[38]

Martingales in B anach spaces , volume 155 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics

Gilles Pisier. Martingales in B anach spaces , volume 155 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016

2016
[39]

Wavelet analysis of conservative cascades

Sidney Resnick, Gennady Samorodnitsky, Anna Gilbert, and Walter Willinger. Wavelet analysis of conservative cascades. Bernoulli , 9(1):97--135, 2003

2003
[40]

Branching random walks , volume 2151 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics

Zhan Shi. Branching random walks , volume 2151 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics . Springer, Cham, 2015. Lecture notes from the 42nd Probability Summer School held in Saint Flour, 2012, \' E cole d'\' E t\' e de Probabilit\' e s de Saint-Flour. [Saint-Flour Probability Summer School]

2015
[41]

Waymire and Stanley C

Edward C. Waymire and Stanley C. Williams. Multiplicative cascades: dimension spectra and dependence. In Proceedings of the C onference in H onor of J ean- P ierre K ahane ( O rsay, 1993) , Kahane Special Issue, pages 589--609, 1995

1993
[42]

Waymire and Stanley C

Edward C. Waymire and Stanley C. Williams. Markov cascades. In Classical and modern branching processes ( M inneapolis, MN , 1994) , volume 84 of IMA Vol. Math. Appl. , pages 305--321. Springer, New York, 1997

1994

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Random conformal weldings

Kari Astala, Peter Jones, Antti Kupiainen, and Eero Saksman. Random conformal weldings. Acta Math. , 207(2):203--254, 2011

work page 2011

[2] [2]

Critical mandelbrot cascades

Julien Barral, Antti Kupiainen, Miika Nikula, Eero Saksman and Christian Webb. Critical mandelbrot cascades. Comm. Math. Phys. , 325: 685-711, 2014

work page 2014

[3] [3]

Continuity of the multifractal spectrum of a random statistically self-similar measure, J

Julien Barral. Continuity of the multifractal spectrum of a random statistically self-similar measure, J. Theoretic. Probab. , 13, 1027–1060, 2000

work page 2000

[4] [4]

Generalized vector multiplicative cascades

Julien Barral. Generalized vector multiplicative cascades. Adv. Appl. Probab. , vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 874--895, 2001

work page 2001

[5] [5]

Multifractal analysis of complex random cascades

Julien Barral and Xiong Jin. Multifractal analysis of complex random cascades. Comm. Math. Phys. , 297, no. 1, 129–168, 2010

work page 2010

[6] [6]

Uniform convergence for complex [0,1]-martingales

Julien Barral, Xiong Jin and Benoit B Mandelbrot. Uniform convergence for complex [0,1]-martingales. Ann. Appl. Probab. , 20(4): 1205–1218, 2010

work page 2010

[7] [7]

Convergence of complex multiplicative cascades

Julien Barral, Xiong Jin and Benoit B Mandelbrot. Convergence of complex multiplicative cascades. Ann. Appl. Probab. , 20(4): 1219-1252, 2010

work page 2010

[8] [8]

Introduction to infinite products of independent random functions ( R andom multiplicative multifractal measures

Julien Barral and Beno\^ i t Mandelbrot. Introduction to infinite products of independent random functions ( R andom multiplicative multifractal measures. I ). In Fractal geometry and applications: a jubilee of B eno\^ i t M andelbrot, P art 2 . Volume 72 of Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. , pages 3--16, AMS, 2004

work page 2004