Legendrian doubles, twist spuns, and clusters

Agniva Roy; James Hughes

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 53 references

Legendrian doubles, twist spuns, and clusters

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Twist-spun Legendrians from braid-positive links carry cluster ensembles whose seeds are all geometric.

desk verdict Two genuinely promising constructions, but both central proofs have gaps that need closing before the main theorems can be taken as proved. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.17901 v1 pith:OZNVT2GN submitted 2025-05-23 math.SG

James Hughes , Agniva Roy This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.SG MSC 53D1253D1013F6014M15

keywords LegendriansurfacesexactLagrangianfillingsclusteralgebrassheafmodulitwistspunsdoublesmicrolocalsheavesGrassmannianfixedpoints

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that cluster-algebra techniques, previously successful for Legendrian links in $\mathbb{R}^3$, lift to Legendrian surfaces in $\mathbb{R}^5$ built by doubling fillings or twist-spinning along Legendrian loops. For doubles, it shows the sheaf moduli is the intersection of the two toric charts carried by the constituent fillings, so an asymmetric double cannot be exactly filled whenever the two charts are distinct. For twist-spuns, it shows that under a global foldability condition the sheaf moduli of the surface forms a skew-symmetrizable cluster ensemble, and every cluster seed is induced by an embedded exact Lagrangian filling. This gives infinite families of exact fillings of certain twist-spun tori, exact counts for the $(2,n)$ family, and fillability obstructions from rational fixed points.

What carries the argument

The central object is the moduli space $\mathcal{M}_1(\Lambda)$ of microlocal rank-one sheaves with singular support on a Legendrian $\Lambda$, a constructible-sheaf invariant that carries cluster coordinates for braid-positive links. The transfer to twist-spuns is carried by three mechanisms: the identification of the twist-spun moduli with the $G$-invariant locus times $\mathbb{C}^*$, the folding construction that quotients a cluster algebra by a finite group of cluster automorphisms, and solid mutation configurations in the $3$-manifold filling $L\times_\varphi S^1$, which turn each folded mutation into an explicit Lagrangian surgery.

What would settle it

Independently compute the microlocal rank-one sheaf moduli of a small twist-spun, such as $\Sigma_\rho(\lambda(2,3))$, by enumerating the constructible sheaves on its front stratification and compare the result with the $G$-invariant locus of $\mathcal{M}_1(\lambda(2,3))\times\mathbb{C}^*$; any mismatch in the fixed points, in the rank of the $\mathbb{C}^*$ factor, or in the singular-support conditions would falsify the identification and hence the folded cluster structure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.13: if $\lambda$ is a braid-positive Legendrian link whose decorated sheaf moduli $\mathcal{M}(\lambda,T)$ is a globally foldable cluster algebra with respect to the finite group $G$ generated by a Legendrian loop $\varphi$, and if $L$ is a $\varphi$-fixed exact filling carrying a maximal collection of $L$-compressing cycles, then the moduli stacks $\mathcal{M}(\Sigma_\varphi(\lambda,T))$ and $\mathcal{M}_1(\Sigma_\varphi(\lambda,T))$ of the twist-spun surface form a cluster ensemble in which every cluster chart comes from an embedded exact Lagrangian filling. The transfer rests on identifying the twist-spun's sheaf moduli with the $G$-invariant part of the link's sheaf moduli up to a $\mathbb{C}^*$ factor, and on a higher-dimensional Lagrangian surgery that realizes folded mutations geometrically. For doubles, the parallel result is that $\mathcal{M}_1(\Lambda(L_1,L_2))$ equals the intersection $C_{L_1}\cap C_{L_2}$ of the two filling charts, which obstructs exact fillability when the charts are distinct and characterizes the symmetric double as a connect sum of standard tori.

Load-bearing premise

The twist-spun story stands on the claim that sheaves on the twist-spun are exactly sheaves on the link fixed by the loop, with one extra circle-valued degree of freedom; if that identification is off, the folded cluster structure describes the wrong moduli space.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the twist-spun cluster ensemble exists as stated, then $\Sigma_{\rho^3}(\lambda(3,6))$ and $\Sigma_{\rho^4}(\lambda(4,4))$ admit infinitely many embedded exact Lagrangian fillings.
For $\Sigma_{\rho^k}(\lambda(2,n))$, there are at least $f(k)$ fillings, matching the number of seeds in the folded cluster algebra, and the paper conjectures this count is exact.
A double $\Lambda(L_1,L_2)$ built from fillings inducing distinct toric charts admits no embedded exact Lagrangian filling, though the double is non-loose.
When two trivalent-graph fillings of $\lambda(2,n)$ have algebraic mutation distance at least $n$, their double is not a connect sum of standard and Clifford tori.
Certain twist-spuns $\Sigma_{\rho^\ell}(\lambda(2,n-2))$ and $\Sigma_{\rho^\ell}(\lambda(3,n-3))$ have no exact Lagrangian fillings, because their sheaf moduli have no rational points.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

One can use the folding mechanism as a classification tool: finiteness or infiniteness of the folded cluster algebra should predict whether the corresponding twist-spun has finitely or infinitely many embedded exact fillings, extending the paper's ADE-style conjecture beyond the $(2,n)$ family.
The four-color-theorem reformulation in the paper suggests a concrete finite-field test: checking that any two toric charts on $\mathcal{M}_1(\lambda(2,n))$ intersect over $\mathbb{F}_3$ for larger $n$ would confirm the cluster-geometric picture and connect it to planar graph coloring.
The mutation-distance obstruction for doubles leaves open a sharper statement: if mutation distance is not a complete isotopy invariant, different minimal mutation sequences between the same two fillings might produce non-isotopic doubles, which could be tested by comparing chromatic polynomials of the corresponding cubic planar graphs.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here's my read of 2505.17901. It's a very interesting paper that introduces two genuinely new mechanisms — mutation distance for distinguishing Legendrian doubles, and folding of cluster structures for twist-spuns — but as it stands, both central arguments have a gap. I don't think the main theorems are proved yet, but the paper deserves a serious referee and, if the authors close the gaps, it will be an important contribution.

The good parts: the combinatorial work is solid and well motivated. The notion of mutation distance (Definition 5.7) and the criterion in Theorem 5.12 giving a lower bound for non-decomposability of doubles are clean and useful. The chromatic polynomial computations for cubic planar doubles are nice, and they lead to a genuinely interesting question about the Treumann–Zaslow conjecture. The Karp fixed-point analysis in Section 6.4.2 is a good idea and correctly obstructs fillability in the stated numerical cases. The writing is clear, and the authors are transparent about what is new and what is cited.

Now the soft spots, both of which are load-bearing. First, Theorem 4.3. The proof uses Lemma 4.4 to claim that an embedding of a torus of the same rank into each toric chart must be an isomorphism. But the induced map from (C*)^r into C1 is only known to be injective and same-dimensional; that does not make it an open embedding. Distinct cluster charts can intersect in a full-dimensional torus without being equal. So the argument does not rule out an exact filling of an asymmetric double. The result might be true, but it needs a different proof.

Second, Proposition 6.3. The proof that M1(Σφ(λ)) ≅ M1(λ)^G × C* assumes the front of the twist-spun is locally Π(λ) × [−ε, ε], which only holds for the identity loop. For a genuine Legendrian loop, the front slices move, and the sheaf need not be locally constant in the S1 direction. The identification is the foundation for Theorem 1.13 and all the twist-spun cluster results (Theorems 1.11, 1.12, and the obstruction in 6.22). Without an independent check, those results currently rest on an unverified step.

This paper is for people working in microlocal sheaf theory and cluster algebras, and it raises questions that will interest the wider symplectic topology community. Send it to peer review: a good referee can help pin down what is needed to fill the gaps. But I would not cite the main theorems as proved until those gaps are addressed.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies Legendrian surfaces in standard contact R^5 obtained from a Legendrian link λ in R^3 by two constructions: the Legendrian double Λ(L1,L2) of two exact Lagrangian fillings of λ, and the twist-spun Σ_φ(λ) associated to a Legendrian loop φ of λ. For doubles, it proves an obstruction to exact fillability when the two fillings induce distinct toric charts in the sheaf moduli M1(λ) (Theorem 1.1), an isotopy classification of symmetric doubles as connected sums of standard tori (Theorem 1.3), and a decomposition criterion for doubles obtained by mutating simultaneously simplifiable cycles (Theorem 1.4). For twist-spuns, the paper proposes a cluster ensemble structure on the sheaf moduli M(Σ_φ(λ)) and M1(Σ_φ(λ)) by folding a globally foldable cluster structure on M(λ) under the finite group G generated by φ (Theorem 1.13), and derives applications: infinite families of exact fillings of certain twist-spuns (Theorem 1.11), lower bounds on filling counts for λ(2,n) (Theorem 1.12), and non-fillability obstructions based on absence of rational points (Theorem 1.17).

Significance. If the central cluster-structure result is valid, it would provide the first cluster structures on sheaf moduli of Legendrian surfaces in dimension five with every seed induced by an embedded exact filling, and it would give new constructions and obstructions for twist-spun Legendrians. The paper also introduces useful notions such as mutation distance and solid mutation configurations, and it contains substantial combinatorial analysis of doubles of torus-link fillings, including potential counterexamples to the Treumann–Zaslow chromatic-polynomial conjecture. However, the proof of the key transfer step for twist-spuns, Proposition 6.3, is not carried out in the stated generality, and the applications inherit this gap; a rigorous proof of that identification, or an independent check, is needed for the main theorem to stand.

major comments (3)

[6.1, Proposition 6.3] The proof claims that a sheaf with singular support in Σ_φ(λ) must propagate in the S^1 direction, i.e. that stalks at (x,t−ε) and (x,t) are isomorphic, because the front is locally Π(λ)×[−ε,ε]. For a genuine Legendrian loop φ, the front slices λ_θ move as θ varies, so the trace front is not locally a product and the conormal to the moving front can have a nonzero p_θ component. The argument as written therefore establishes the identification M1(Σ_φ(λ),τ) ≅ M1(λ,T)^G × C* only in the product case φ = id. Since Proposition 6.3 is used to transfer cluster structures to twist-spuns in the proof of Theorem 6.16 and in Theorems 6.17 and 6.22, this is a load-bearing gap. A proof via sheaf quantization of the Legendrian isotopy (GKS) or an independent verification of the fixed-locus/C*-splitting is required.
[6.3.3, proof of Theorem 6.16] Even assuming Proposition 6.3, the proof does not show that the folded cluster variables arising from the weighted quiver Q^G_L generate the full coordinate ring C[M(Σ_φ(λ),τ)]. The map Φ is described as 'taking G-invariance', but no argument is given that the invariant subring of the Casals–Weng cluster algebra on M(λ,T) is precisely the folded cluster algebra, nor that the latter is exactly the ring of regular functions on the G-fixed locus. Without such a generation statement, Theorem 1.13 does not establish a cluster ensemble structure on the moduli of the twist-spun; the paper would need to prove that the folded seeds cover the fixed locus and that the resulting cluster algebra coincides with the coordinate ring.
[6.4.2, Theorem 6.22] The rational-point obstruction is not justified in the text. The proof only computes Plücker ratios for the real fixed points of the cyclic shift action (ζ_2 = ζ_1^{-1} for k = 2 and ζ_3 = 1 for k = 3), not for all fixed points appearing in Karp's classification in Theorem 6.20. Moreover, an exact Lagrangian filling would yield a complex point of the complex moduli space; to obstruct fillings by absence of rational points one must specify a Q-structure on the moduli space and show that no Q-point exists, not merely that a particular real fixed point has irrational coordinate ratios. As written, the argument does not rule out other fixed points over Q or other complex points, so Theorem 1.17 is not established.

minor comments (6)

[2.2, Proposition 2.7 proof] The sentence 'after choosing the right D^2 ⊂ R^5' should be clarified (likely D^4 or the symplectic ball); the satellite construction is described informally.
[6.1, first paragraph] The notation τ = {t_1 ×_φ S^1, ...} is used before the fiberwise construction for marked circles is defined; please define this explicitly.
[4.1, proof of Theorem 4.3] The application of Lemma 4.4 is terse: it should be stated explicitly that the embedding (C*)^{b1(L)} → M1(Λ(L1,L2)) composed with the inclusion C1∩C2 → C1 is an open embedding of a torus into a torus, so that the lemma applies.
[Table 1] The column H/⟨φ⟩H contains entries such as 'Mod(S2,4) ⋊ Z2'; please define the notation and provide a reference for these group descriptions.
[5.2, use of [STT88]] The paper cites [STT88] for the statement that for n ≥ 9 there are fillings with n < d_μ(L1,L2) ≤ 2n−6; please state the precise rotation-distance theorem being used.
[Throughout] There are several typos and notation inconsistencies, e.g. 'Grassmanians' in the abstract, nonstandard accents in 'Kálmán', and the phrase 'the Demazure product of β = ∆' in §4.2 is ambiguous.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the twist-spun cluster transfer is conditional on an input cluster structure and proved by geometric surgery, while self-citations to prior work are not load-bearing reductions.

full rationale

The paper's central constructive claim (Theorem 1.13) is explicitly conditional: it assumes that C[M(λ,T)] is a globally foldable cluster algebra with respect to a G-action and that L is a φ-fixed filling with a maximal collection of L-compressing cycles, and then proves that the sheaf moduli of the twist-spun Σφ(λ) inherit a cluster ensemble whose seeds are realized by embedded fillings. This is a transfer statement rather than a renaming of the hypothesis: the folded quiver, the character lattices H2(L×φS1, τ) and H2((L×φS1)\τ,(λ×φS1)\τ), and the mutation-by-surgery results (Lemmas 6.10, 6.12, 6.15) provide independent geometric content. Proposition 6.3, identifying the twist-spun moduli with the G-fixed locus times C*, is the key computational step; even if its assertion that the front is locally Π(λ)×[−ε,ε] is debatable for a genuinely moving Legendrian loop, that is a correctness or rigor concern rather than circularity: the target statement is not assumed as the definition of M1(Σφ(λ)). The filling counts in Theorems 1.11, 1.12, and 6.17 are not fitted inputs called predictions: fillings are constructed from symmetric weaves and matched with cluster seeds, with infinite families arising from external faithful actions. The paper does cite the first author's prior work [Hug23, Hug24] for inputs such as group actions, symmetric weaves, and cluster-modular actions (e.g., in Theorem 5.22 and Theorem 6.19), and Remark 1.14 explicitly frames Theorem 1.13 as an alternative characterization of the folding operation in [Hug24]; these are prior results, not the paper's target conclusions, and no step in the central derivation reduces to a self-citation chain. Score 2 reflects the presence of minor self-citations, not load-bearing circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a network of established theorems in microlocal sheaf theory and cluster theory (CW24, CG24, JT24, Li23, Kar19) plus standard number theory (Niven). No free parameters are fitted. The only potentially non-established input is Fraser's Conjecture 9.1 used in one case of Theorem 6.17. No new postulated entities are introduced.

assumptions (8)

domain assumption Casals-Weng cluster structure theorem (CW24, Theorem 3.6): for lambda from a complete grid plabic graph, M(lambda,T) admits a cluster A structure with initial seed from a weave filling.
Supplies the cluster structure on the link moduli that is folded in Theorem 1.13; also used implicitly throughout Sections 5 and 6.
domain assumption Casals-Gao theorem (CG24): every cluster seed in the cluster structure on M(lambda) is induced by an embedded exact Lagrangian filling.
Used to assert that each seed of the folded cluster algebra gives a filling of the twist-spun, and to relate mutation distance to Lagrangian disk surgery.
domain assumption Jin-Treumann results (JT24): fillings induce open embeddings of local system tori into sheaf moduli, and rational points are necessary for fillability.
Underlies Theorem 4.3 and the rational point obstruction in Theorem 6.22.
domain assumption Li's homotopy pullback formula for the sheaf category of a double (Li23), giving M1(Lambda(L1,L2)) is isomorphic to C_{L1} intersect C_{L2}.
Lemma 4.2 is the basis for all double computations; the paper attributes it to Li23.
domain assumption Karp's fixed point theorem for the cyclic shift on Gr(k,n) (Kar19, Theorem 1.1).
Lists the fixed points whose rationality is analyzed in Theorem 6.22.
standard math Niven's theorem on rational values of cosine at rational multiples of pi.
Used to show 2cos(pi k/n) and 2cos(2pi j/n)+1 are irrational when Equations 3-4 hold.
domain assumption Fraser's generalized cluster structure on Gr(2,n+2)^{rho^{(n+2)/3}} with C_{(n+2)/3} seeds (Fra20a, Conjecture 9.1 and Example 9.3).
Used in the proof of Theorem 6.17 for the k=(n+2)/3 case; because it is flagged as a conjecture, the unconditional theorem is fragile.
domain assumption Global foldability of C[M(lambda,T)] with respect to the G-action is assumed in Theorem 1.13; the paper verifies it in specific examples.
This technical condition is what makes mutation commute with folding; if it fails, the cluster ensemble on the twist-spun is not established.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Legendrian doubles, twist spuns, and clusters." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OZNVT2GN

@misc{pith2026250517901,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Legendrian doubles, twist spuns, and clusters},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OZNVT2GN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.17901}
}

abstract

Let $\lambda$ be a Legendrian link in standard contact $\mathbb{R}^3$, such that $L_1$, $L_2$ are two exact fillings of $\lambda$ and $\varphi$ is a Legendrian loop of $\lambda$. We study fillability and isotopy characterizations of Legendrian surfaces in standard contact $\mathbb{R}^5$ built from the above data by doubling or twist spinning; denoting them $\Lambda(L_1,L_2)$ or $\Sigma_\varphi(\lambda)$ respectively. In the case of doubles $\Lambda(L_1,L_2)$, if the sheaf moduli $\mathcal{M}_1(\lambda)$ admits a cluster structure, we introduce the notion of mutation distance and study its relationship with the isotopy class of the Legendrian surface. For twist spuns $\Sigma_\varphi(\lambda)$, when $\mathcal{M}_1(\lambda)$ admits a globally foldable cluster structure, we use the existence of a $\varphi$-symmetric filling of the Legendrian link to build a cluster structure on the sheaf moduli of the twist spun by folding. We then use that to motivate, and provide evidence for, conjectures on the number of embedded exact fillings of certain twist spuns. Further, we obstruct the exact fillability of certain twist spuns by analyzing fixed points of the cyclic shift action on Grassmanians.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.17901 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Front projection of Legendrian given as the (−1) closure of β∆. We now restrict our attention to Legendrians λ = λ(β∆) ⊆ (R 3 , ξst) given as the (-1)-closure of the positive braid β∆ with Demazure product δ(β) = ∆; see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Legendrian double that does not decompose as a connect sum of standard and Clifford tori (left) and Legendrian double formed from fillings of λ(2, 6) with a chromatic polynomial divisible by q − 2 (right) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Legendrian doubles formed from fillings of λ(2, 10) with the same chromatic polynomial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (12 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: A cubic planar Legendrian which is possibly not Legendrian isotopic to a double Example 1.8. The trivalent graph Γ in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Singularities of front projections of Legendrian surfaces. Labels correspond to notation used by Arnold in his classification. Since the boundary of our singular surface Π(Λ) is the front projection of an N-stranded positive braid, Π(Λ) can be pictured as a collection…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: The weaving of singularities of fronts along the edges of the N-graph (courtesy of Roger Casals and Eric Zaslow, used with permission). Gluing these local models according to the N-graph Γ yields the weave Λ(Γ). If we take an open cover {Ui} m i=1 of D 2×{0} by open di…

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Legendrian Surface Reidemeister moves for N-graphs. Clockwise from top left, a candy twist, a push-through, a flop, and two additional moves, denoted by Tw, PT, Fl, IV, and V respectively [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: The surgery moves in Theorem 2.5. We can also perform local combinatorial modifications to N-graphs to realize certain Legendrian surgeries. Theorem 2.5 (Theorem 4.10, [CZ22]). Given two N-graphs, the local modifications shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012…

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Mutation at a short I-cycle. 2.5. Doubling Legendrian weaves. We first define a doubling operation on N-graphs that we then use to construct the Legendrian doubles via weaves. Definition 2.6. Consider two properly embedded N-graphs G1 ⊂ D 2 and G2 ⊂ D2 with the same bo…

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: 2-graphs representing Cases (1) and (2) appearing in the proof of Theorem 4.7 together with an example (3) with labeled cycles. Since wL, is an embedded weave filling of λ(β), the end result of this inductive process is the braid ∆2 forming concentric circles. Follow…

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: A Legendrian weave L ′ (middle) representing an immersed Lagrangian filling obtained from the weave L (left) by deleting a short I-cycle. The resulting Legendrian double Λ(L, L′ ) is loose. 5. Doubles of Torus Link Fillings In this section, we continue to explore meth…

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: Legendrians L1 (left), L2 (middle), and their double Λ(L1, L2) (right). The double is not a connect sum of standard and Clifford tori. Remark 5.13. The first non-decomposable example is obtained for n = 4. Let L1 and L2 be fillings of λ(2, 4) and consider their double…

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: The graphs G and G \ e and their duals. Proposition 5.19. A Legendrian corresponding to a generalized cube graph is not completely decomposable into Clifford and standard tori. Proof. We will prove this by induction on the number of vertices in the graph, and by show…

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: Legendrian weave filling of Λ(2, 6) and its intersection quiver (left) and the quiver obtained from folding by the action of ρ 4 (right). Mutable quiver vertices are colored according to which ρ 4 orbits they belong to. Given γ ∈ H1(L, T), denote by Tφ(γ) the orbit of…

**Figure 15.** Figure 15: Symmetric fillings of Λ(4, 4) (left) and Λ(3, 6) (right) corresponding to fillings of Σρ 2 (Λ(4, 4)) and Σρ 3 (Λ(3, 6)), respectively. Given the existence of cluster structures on sheaf moduli of twist-spuns, we extend the conjectural ADE classification of exact Lagra…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

[1]

Lagrangian fillings for Legendrian links of finite type

Byung Hee An, Youngjin Bae, and Eunjeong Lee. L agrangian fillings for L egendrian links of finite type. arXiv:2101.01943, 2021

work page Pith review arXiv 2021
[2]

V. I. Arnol d. Singularities of caustics and wave fronts , volume 62 of Mathematics and its Applications (Soviet Series) . Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, 1990

work page 1990
[3]

L agrangian skeleta and plane curve singularities

Roger Casals. L agrangian skeleta and plane curve singularities. JFPTA , Viterbo 60, 2021

work page 2021
[4]

Lagrangian fillings and complicated Legendrian unknots

Sylvain Courte and Tobias Ekholm. Lagrangian fillings and complicated L egendrian unknots. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.07849 , 2017

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[5]

Infinitely many L agrangian fillings

Roger Casals and Honghao Gao. Infinitely many L agrangian fillings. Ann. of Math. (2) , 195(1):207--249, 2022

work page 2022
[6]

A L agrangian filling for every cluster seed

Roger Casals and Honghao Gao. A L agrangian filling for every cluster seed. Invent. Math. , 237(2):809--868, 2024

work page 2024
[7]

Cluster structures on braid varieties

Roger Casals, Eugene Gorsky, Mikhail Gorsky, Ian Le, Linhui Shen, and Jos\'e Simental. Cluster structures on braid varieties. J. Amer. Math. Soc. (to appear) , 2024

work page 2024
[8]

Algebraic weaves and braid varieties

Roger Casals, Eugene Gorsky, Mikhail Gorsky, and Jos\'e Simental. Algebraic weaves and braid varieties. Amer. J. Math (to appear) , 2024

work page 2024

Show all 53 references

[9]

Bohr- S ommerfeld profile surgeries and disk potentials

Soham Chanda. Bohr- S ommerfeld profile surgeries and disk potentials. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.11603 , 2024

2024 arXiv
[10]

Infinitely many exotic L agrangian tori in higher projective spaces

Soham Chanda, Amanda Hirschi, and Luya Wang. Infinitely many exotic L agrangian tori in higher projective spaces. J. Fixed Point Theory Appl. , 26(4):Paper No. 46, 18, 2024

2024
[11]

Conjugate fillings and L egendrian weaves, 2022

Roger Casals and Wenyuan Li. Conjugate fillings and L egendrian weaves, 2022

2022
[12]

Demazure weaves for reduced plabic graphs (with a proof that M uller- S peyer twist is D onaldson- T homas)

Roger Casals, Ian Le, Melissa Sherman-Bennett, and Daping Weng. Demazure weaves for reduced plabic graphs (with a proof that M uller- S peyer twist is D onaldson- T homas). arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06184 , 2023

2023 arXiv
[13]

Differential algebra of cubic planar graphs

Roger Casals and Emmy Murphy. Differential algebra of cubic planar graphs. Adv. Math. , 338:401--446, 2018

2018
[14]

L egendrian fronts for affine varieties

Roger Casals and Emmy Murphy. L egendrian fronts for affine varieties. Duke Math. J. , 168(2):225--323, 2019

2019
[15]

Braid loops with infinite monodromy on the L egendrian contact DGA

Roger Casals and Lenhard Ng. Braid loops with infinite monodromy on the L egendrian contact DGA . J. Topol. , 15(4):1927--2016, 2022

1927
[16]

On N ewton polytopes of L agrangian augmentations

Orsola Capovilla-Searle and Roger Casals. On N ewton polytopes of L agrangian augmentations. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. , 56(4):1263--1290, 2024

2024
[17]

Microlocal theory of L egendrian links and cluster algebras

Roger Casals and Daping Weng. Microlocal theory of L egendrian links and cluster algebras. Geom. Topol. , 28(2):901--1000, 2024

2024
[18]

Legendrian weaves: N -graph calculus, flag moduli and applications

Roger Casals and Eric Zaslow. Legendrian weaves: N -graph calculus, flag moduli and applications. Geom. Topol. , 26(8):3589--3745, 2022

2022
[19]

On L egendrian products and twist spuns

Georgios Dimitroglou Rizell and Roman Golovko. On L egendrian products and twist spuns. Algebr. Geom. Topol. , 21(2):665--695, 2021

2021
[20]

Non-isotopic L egendrian submanifolds in R 2n+1

Tobias Ekholm, John Etnyre, and Michael Sullivan. Non-isotopic L egendrian submanifolds in R 2n+1 . J. Differential Geom. , 71(1):85--128, 2005

2005
[21]

Isotopies of L egendrian 1-knots and L egendrian 2-tori

Tobias Ekholm and Tam\' a s K\' a lm\' a n. Isotopies of L egendrian 1-knots and L egendrian 2-tori. J. Symplectic Geom. , 6(4):407--460, 2008

2008
[22]

Non-loose L egendrian spheres with trivial contact homology dga

Tobias Ekholm. Non-loose L egendrian spheres with trivial contact homology dga. Journal of Topology , 9(3):826--848, 2016

2016
[23]

Brick manifolds and toric varieties of brick polytopes

Laura Escobar. Brick manifolds and toric varieties of brick polytopes. Electron. J. Combin. , 23(2):Paper 2.25, 18, 2016

2016
[24]

Braid group symmetries of G rassmannian cluster algebras

Chris Fraser. Braid group symmetries of G rassmannian cluster algebras. Selecta Math. (N.S.) , 26(2):Paper No. 17, 51, 2020

2020
[25]

Cyclic symmetry loci in G rassmannians, 2020

Chris Fraser. Cyclic symmetry loci in G rassmannians, 2020

2020
[26]

Introduction to cluster algebras: Chapters 1-3

Sergey Fomin, Lauren Williams, and Andrei Zelevinsky. Introduction to cluster algebras: Chapters 1-3. arXiv:1608.05735, 2020

2020 arXiv
[27]

Introduction to cluster algebras: Chapters 4-5

Sergey Fomin, Lauren Williams, and Andrei Zelevinsky. Introduction to cluster algebras: Chapters 4-5. arXiv:1707.07190, 2020

2020 arXiv
[28]

An introduction to contact topology , volume 109 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics

Hansj \"o rg Geiges. An introduction to contact topology , volume 109 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008

2008
[29]

Birational geometry of cluster algebras

Mark Gross, Paul Hacking, and Sean Keel. Birational geometry of cluster algebras. Algebr. Geom. , 2(2):137--175, 2015

2015
[30]

Sheaf quantization of H amiltonian isotopies and applications to nondisplaceability problems

St\' e phane Guillermou, Masaki Kashiwara, and Pierre Schapira. Sheaf quantization of H amiltonian isotopies and applications to nondisplaceability problems. Duke Math. J. , 161(2):201--245, 2012

2012
[31]

A note on the infinite number of exact L agrangian fillings for spherical spuns

Roman Golovko. A note on the infinite number of exact L agrangian fillings for spherical spuns. Pacific J. Math. , 317(1):143--152, 2022

2022
[32]

Augmentations, fillings, and clusters

Honghao Gao, Linhui Shen, and Daping Weng. Augmentations, fillings, and clusters. Geom. Funct. Anal. , 34(3):798--867, 2024

2024
[33]

Lagrangian fillings in A -type and their K \'alm\'an loop orbits

James Hughes. Lagrangian fillings in A -type and their K \'alm\'an loop orbits. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. , 39(5):1681--1723, 2023

2023
[34]

Legendrian loops and cluster modular groups

James Hughes. Legendrian loops and cluster modular groups. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.12951, 2024

2024 arXiv
[35]

Brane structures in microlocal sheaf theory

Xin Jin and David Treumann. Brane structures in microlocal sheaf theory. J. Topol. , 17(1):Paper No. e12325, 68, 2024

2024
[36]

Contact homology and one parameter families of L egendrian knots

Tam\' a s K \' a lm\' a n. Contact homology and one parameter families of L egendrian knots. Geom. Topol. , 9:2013--2078, 2005

2013
[37]

Steven N. Karp. Moment curves and cyclic symmetry for positive G rassmannians. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. , 51(5):900--916, 2019

2019
[38]

Kauffman

Louis H. Kauffman. Map coloring and the vector cross product. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B , 48(2):145--154, 1990

1990
[39]

Microlocal study of sheaves

Masaki Kashiwara and Pierre Schapira. Microlocal study of sheaves. Ast\' e risque , (128):235, 1985. Corrections to this article can be found in Ast\' e risque No. 130, p. 209

1985
[40]

Lagrangian cobordism functor in microlocal sheaf theory ii

Wenyuan Li. Lagrangian cobordism functor in microlocal sheaf theory ii. J. Sympl. Geom. (to appear) , 2023

2023
[41]

E. Murphy . Loose L egendrian Embeddings in High Dimensional Contact Manifolds . ArXiv e-prints , January 2012

2012
[42]

An L -infinity structure for L egendrian contact homology, 2023

Lenhard Ng. An L -infinity structure for L egendrian contact homology, 2023

2023
[43]

Constructible sheaves and the F ukaya category

David Nadler and Eric Zaslow. Constructible sheaves and the F ukaya category. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 22(1):233--286, 2009

2009
[44]

Exact L agrangian fillings of L egendrian (2,n) torus links

Yu Pan. Exact L agrangian fillings of L egendrian (2,n) torus links. Pacific J. Math. , 289(2):417--441, 2017

2017
[45]

The diameter of associahedra

Lionel Pournin. The diameter of associahedra. Adv. Math. , 259:13--42, 2014

2014
[46]

The wall-crossing formula and L agrangian mutations

James Pascaleff and Dmitry Tonkonog. The wall-crossing formula and L agrangian mutations. Advances in Mathematics , 361:106850, 2020

2020
[47]

Skein valued cluster transformation in enumerative geometry of L egendrian mutation

Matthias Scharitzer and Vivek Shende. Skein valued cluster transformation in enumerative geometry of L egendrian mutation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.10625 , 2023

2023 arXiv
[48]

The chromatic L agrangian: wavefunctions and open G romov- W itten conjectures

Gus Schrader, Linhui Shen, and Eric Zaslow. The chromatic L agrangian: wavefunctions and open G romov- W itten conjectures. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. , 28(6):1781--1879, 2024

2024
[49]

Sleator, Robert E

Daniel D. Sleator, Robert E. Tarjan, and William P. Thurston. Rotation distance, triangulations, and hyperbolic geometry. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 1(3):647--681, 1988

1988
[50]

S age M ath, the S age M athematics S oftware S ystem , 2022

The Sage Developers . S age M ath, the S age M athematics S oftware S ystem , 2022. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.6259615

2022 doi
[51]

Cubic planar graphs and L egendrian surface theory

David Treumann and Eric Zaslow. Cubic planar graphs and L egendrian surface theory. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. , 22(5):1289--1345, 2018

2018
[52]

A theorem on graphs

Hassler Whitney. A theorem on graphs. Ann. of Math. (2) , 32(2):378--390, 1931

1931
[53]

Surgery and isotopy of L agrangian surfaces

Mei-Lin Yau. Surgery and isotopy of L agrangian surfaces. In Proceedings of the S ixth I nternational C ongress of C hinese M athematicians. V ol. II , volume 37 of Adv. Lect. Math. (ALM) , pages 143--162. Int. Press, Somerville, MA, 2017

2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Lagrangian fillings for Legendrian links of finite type

Byung Hee An, Youngjin Bae, and Eunjeong Lee. L agrangian fillings for L egendrian links of finite type. arXiv:2101.01943, 2021

work page Pith review arXiv 2021

[2] [2]

V. I. Arnol d. Singularities of caustics and wave fronts , volume 62 of Mathematics and its Applications (Soviet Series) . Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, 1990

work page 1990

[3] [3]

L agrangian skeleta and plane curve singularities

Roger Casals. L agrangian skeleta and plane curve singularities. JFPTA , Viterbo 60, 2021

work page 2021

[4] [4]

Lagrangian fillings and complicated Legendrian unknots

Sylvain Courte and Tobias Ekholm. Lagrangian fillings and complicated L egendrian unknots. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.07849 , 2017

work page Pith review arXiv 2017

[5] [5]

Infinitely many L agrangian fillings

Roger Casals and Honghao Gao. Infinitely many L agrangian fillings. Ann. of Math. (2) , 195(1):207--249, 2022

work page 2022

[6] [6]

A L agrangian filling for every cluster seed

Roger Casals and Honghao Gao. A L agrangian filling for every cluster seed. Invent. Math. , 237(2):809--868, 2024

work page 2024

[7] [7]

Cluster structures on braid varieties

Roger Casals, Eugene Gorsky, Mikhail Gorsky, Ian Le, Linhui Shen, and Jos\'e Simental. Cluster structures on braid varieties. J. Amer. Math. Soc. (to appear) , 2024

work page 2024

[8] [8]

Algebraic weaves and braid varieties

Roger Casals, Eugene Gorsky, Mikhail Gorsky, and Jos\'e Simental. Algebraic weaves and braid varieties. Amer. J. Math (to appear) , 2024

work page 2024