Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 65 references

BL Lacertae under the Flare of 2024: Probing Temporal and Spectral Dynamics

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The October 2024 flare of BL Lacertae was the brightest gamma-ray outburst recorded from this blazar, and its 1.06-hour minimum flux-doubling time confines the emitting region to $R \le 1.2 \times 10^{15}$ cm.

desk verdict Useful new-epoch flare study with a credible 1.06 hr GeV doubling time; the hadronic and inside-BLR conclusions are not supported by the analysis as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.18666 v1 pith:AREDCMKN submitted 2025-05-24 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA

Joysankar Majumdar , Sakshi Maurya , Raj Prince This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.GA
keywords BLLacertaegamma-rayflareblazarvariabilityfluxdoublingtimelepto-hadronicSEDmodelingbroad-lineregioncosmic-rayaccelerationneutrinoproduction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that in October 2024 BL Lacertae produced its brightest gamma-ray flare on record, with a peak flux near $2.59 \times 10^{-5}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, a 175.7 GeV photon, and simultaneous flaring from X-ray to very-high-energy gamma rays. It reports a minimum flux doubling/halving time of $1.06 \pm 0.26$ hours at $4\sigma$ significance, which places an upper bound of about $1.2 \times 10^{15}$ cm on the size of the emitting region. A one-zone lepto-hadronic spectral fit attributes the flare to a sudden enhancement of the magnetic field and bulk Lorentz factor, and finds that the gamma-ray tail is best matched by proton-proton interactions, implying the jet accelerates cosmic-ray protons and may produce neutrinos. The significance is that a historically bright, fast flare in the archetypal BL Lac object gives a concrete test bed for jet physics and cosmic-ray acceleration.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by two central objects. The first is the flux doubling/halving timescale $t_d$ from orbit-binned Fermi-LAT light curves, which enters $R \le c\, t_d\, \delta/(1+z)$ and turns a measured 1.06-hour variability into a $1.2 \times 10^{15}$ cm upper bound on the emission-region size. The second is the one-zone lepto-hadronic SED model with broken-power-law electron and proton populations, which simultaneously fits synchrotron, SSC, external Compton from the broad-line region and dusty torus, and p-p gamma-ray emission; the p-p component ($\pi^0 \to \gamma\gamma$) is what matches the very-high-energy tail. The broad-line-region photon field enters through fixed radii scaled from disk luminosity and through the interpretation of the $>10$ GeV spectral break as gamma-gamma absorption, which positions the emission region inside the broad-line region. The claim that magnetic field and bulk factor enhancement drives the flare rests on the fitted $B$ and $\Gamma$ values.

What would settle it

Fit the flaring SED with the broad-line-region photon field removed and the >10 GeV curvature treated as an intrinsic log-parabola steepening; if that leptonic-only model reproduces the very-high-energy data with comparable goodness of fit, the inside-BLR location and the p-p hadronic requirement would lose their support. A second check is to compute the gamma-gamma optical depth for the 175.7 GeV photon using the fitted BLR parameters: if the optical depth is much larger than unity, the photon should not escape, contradicting the inside-BLR claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the October 2024 event is the historically brightest gamma-ray flare of BL Lacertae, with a 3-day flux of $6.59 \times 10^{-6}$ ph cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ in the 0.1--100 GeV band, and that its fastest significant flux change, $1.06 \pm 0.26$ hours, implies an emission region smaller than $1.2 \times 10^{15}$ cm for a Doppler factor of 11.55. The broadband SED is fitted with a one-zone lepto-hadronic model in which the low-energy hump is synchrotron emission, the X-ray part is synchrotron self-Compton, and the very-high-energy tail is produced jointly by external Compton scattering of broad-line-region and dusty-torus photons and by proton-proton pion decay. The fit returns an emission region of $8 \times 10^{14}$ cm located inside the broad-line region, a magnetic field of 4.24 G, and a bulk factor of 14.11; the paper concludes that the sudden enhancement of magnetic field and bulk factor promotes the flare and that the hadronic component makes BL Lacertae's jet a plausible cosmic-ray accelerator and neutrino source.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes the downturn in the gamma-ray spectrum above 10 GeV comes from gamma rays being absorbed by ultraviolet photons in the broad-line region, rather than from the natural shape of the particle spectrum; if that absorption is not the cause, the inside-BLR geometry and the need for protons both fall away.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A 1.06-hour variability timescale means the gamma-ray emitting zone in BL Lacertae was smaller than about 1.2e15 cm during the October 2024 flare, so the flaring region is extremely compact even for a blazar.
  • If the one-zone lepto-hadronic fit is right, the same flare that produced the 175.7 GeV photon also involved protons accelerated to high energies, making BL Lacertae a candidate source of cosmic rays and, through charged-pion decay, astrophysical neutrinos.
  • The log-normal flux distribution places the flare in the class of multiplicative, non-linear jet perturbations rather than simple additive noise.
  • The fitted emission-region size of 8e14 cm is smaller than the variability-derived bound, implying the true variability timescale may be shorter than the observed 1.06 hours.
  • Because the emission region sits inside the broad-line region, the very-high-energy gamma rays must survive pair-production absorption by broad-line-region photons, a testable constraint.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the >10 GeV break is intrinsic to the particle spectrum instead of gamma-gamma absorption, the inside-BLR geometry and the need for the hadronic component would both be weakened; this can be checked by fitting the flaring SED with no BLR photon field.
  • The sub-hour variability reported by very-high-energy telescopes during the same week suggests that more than one emission zone may be active, so a multi-zone or time-dependent model might change the inferred particle content.
  • A neutrino-stacking analysis over the October 2024 flare window, using the p-p spectrum from this fit, would give a quantitative prediction for neutrino observatories that the paper only frames as an upper limit.
  • If the magnetic-field and bulk-factor enhancement picture is correct, one would expect correlated radio/optical polarization angle swings or very-long-baseline interferometry structural changes on the same timescale; archival data from October 2024 could be searched for such signatures.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes the October 2024 gamma-ray flare of BL Lacertae using Fermi-LAT, Swift-XRT/UVOT, NuSTAR, and published VHE data. It reports a 96-minute-binned Fermi-LAT minimum flux doubling time of 1.06 +/- 0.26 hr (4-sigma), a fractional variability F_var = 1.19 +/- 0.01, a log-normal gamma-ray flux distribution, and a mild harder-when-brighter trend. It then constructs a broadband SED and fits it with a one-zone lepto-hadronic model in JetSeT, concluding that the emission region is inside the BLR, that the magnetic field and bulk Lorentz factor increased compared to earlier states, and that a p-p hadronic component is needed for the VHE tail, implying possible cosmic-ray acceleration and neutrino emission.

Significance. The temporal results are interesting and likely robust: the 1.06 hr doubling time, if correct, constrains the emission region to R <= 1.2e15 cm, and the log-normal distribution supports multiplicative variability. The paper is candid about limitations (e.g., a single NuSTAR observation) and uses standard public tools with reproducible analysis steps. However, the broader physical conclusions regarding inside-BLR location, enhanced B and Gamma, and hadronic/neutrino relevance rest on an untested assumption that the gamma-ray curvature above 10 GeV is BLR absorption rather than intrinsic, and on a heavily parametrized one-zone fit without uncertainties or model comparison. These conclusions should be treated as provisional until the alternative leptonic-only interpretation is tested.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.2, Figure 5] The statement that the curvature above 10 GeV is 'indicating photons above 10 GeV are getting absorbed' is an interpretation, not a measurement; a log-parabolic spectrum or a break can equally be produced by an intrinsic cutoff in the particle distribution. This assumption is load-bearing because it motivates adding BLR components and the p-p hadronic component in Section 3.4. The authors should test the alternative explicitly, for example by fitting the same Fermi-LAT SED with a leptonic-only model (SSC + EC, no p-p) and with an intrinsic spectral cutoff, and report whether BLR absorption is statistically required. Without such a test, the inside-BLR and hadronic-necessity claims are unsupported.
  2. [Section 3.4, Table 1, Eqs. (7)-(8)] The best-fit emission-region height RH = 1.84e16 cm lies almost exactly between the fixed BLR radii R_BLR,in = 1.82e16 cm and R_BLR,out = 2.00e16 cm, which are set by the assumed disk luminosity through Eqs. (7)-(8). The 'inside BLR' result is therefore very likely a consequence of the model setup rather than an independent measurement. The paper should quantify how strongly RH is constrained by the data, for example by profiling the fit statistic as a function of RH with and without BLR components, and should report parameter uncertainties.
  3. [Section 3.4, Table 1] The SED fit has roughly 25 free parameters, including electron and proton spectral indices and cutoffs, B, Gamma, R, R_H, and radiation-field temperatures and radii, but Table 1 reports no uncertainties and no goodness-of-fit or model-comparison statistic. The claim that 'the hadronic part best fitted the high energy part of the spectrum' is therefore not established. The authors should provide a leptonic-only re-fit of the same data, a quantitative comparison of the VHE tail (for example via chi-square or AIC), and parameter uncertainties from the fitting procedure.
  4. [Section 3.4, Figure 8] The broadband SED combines observations taken on different days, with VERITAS and LHAASO on 5 October, MAGIC on 10 October, and NuSTAR on 13 October, while the paper itself reports hour-scale variability. Fitting these non-simultaneous data with a single one-zone snapshot model is internally inconsistent and may bias the derived B, Gamma, and R values. The authors should either restrict the SED to strictly simultaneous data or explicitly model the different epochs separately.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] The phrase 'quite state' should be 'quiet state' in several places, including Sections 3.2 and 5.
  2. [Eq. (1)] The definition Delta t = t1 - t2 appears to have the sign reversed; the flux-doubling formula requires Delta t = t2 - t1 to give a positive doubling time for a rising light curve.
  3. [Table 1] The units of particle densities and energy densities are given as cm-1 but should be cm-3; the row labeled 'UBLR Energy density of magnetic field' should instead read 'radiation energy density'.
  4. [Abstract and Section 3.2] The abstract says 'No compelling correlation has been found' between gamma-ray spectral indices and fluxes, while Section 3.2 reports a Spearman coefficient r = -0.40 with p = 0.002; the wording should be reconciled, for example by saying 'a mild but significant harder-when-brighter trend'.
  5. [Figure 2 and Section 3.2] The text interchangeably calls the binning 'orbit-binned' and '96-min binned'; please define the binning once and use consistent terminology.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

The inside-BLR and hadronic-necessity conclusions are assumptions re-labeled as SED-model outputs; the timing and statistical results are independent.

  1. self definitional [Section 3.2 and Section 3.4 / Summary (inside-BLR conclusion)]
    "A break or curvature above 10 GeV has been observed in both the γ-ray SEDs, indicating photons above 10 GeV are getting absorbed. ... Thus, the curvature in γ-ray spectra can be considered as a signature of photon-photon absorption (pair-production), where a γ-ray photon interacts with low-energy photons from the BLR, suggesting the emission region is possibly within the BLR (Liu and Bai, 2006). ... We found the location of the emission region to be 1.84×10^16 cm, which indicated the emission region is located inside the BLR."

    The BLR-absorption interpretation of the >10 GeV curvature already entails that the emission region is inside the BLR. That interpretation is the reason BLR components are added to the JetSeT model, and the later 'inside BLR' result is the same assumption re-issued as a fit output. The fitted height (1.84e16 cm) merely falls between the fixed R_BLR,in (1.82e16 cm) and R_BLR,out (2.00e16 cm), so it is not an independent test; if the curvature is intrinsic to the particle spectrum, the inside-BLR conclusion loses its basis.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.4 and Summary (hadronic necessity conclusion)]
    "The hadronic part best fitted the high energy part of the spectrum, suggesting the jets of BL Lac could provide a promising environment to accelerate the cosmic ray particles, such as protons. ... Our SED modeling result concludes that a hadronic contribution must be considered to explain the high-energy part of the spectrum, and BL Lac can be considered as a possible source of high-energy cosmic rays and astrophysical neutrinos."

    The p-p hadronic component is an input chosen because 'The detection of VHE γ-ray motivated us to use the lepto-hadronic model' (Section 1). After fitting the same VHE data with this component, the paper relabels the component as a required process ('must be considered') without testing a leptonic-only alternative. The necessity conclusion is thus a restatement of the model choice, not an independent prediction; with ~25 free parameters (Table 1) the fit is not statistically forced.

full rationale

The temporal analysis (1.06 hr doubling time, R≤1.2e15 cm), the log-normal flux distribution, and the log-parabola spectral fits are self-contained data analyses against external Fermi-LAT data and standard catalog templates; no circularity there. The circularity is confined to the interpretive SED layer. The >10 GeV curvature is assumed to be BLR absorption (Section 3.2), which by definition implies the emission region is within the BLR; this motivates inserting BLR components into the model, and the subsequent 'inside BLR' finding is the same assumption returned as a fit result. Likewise, the hadronic p-p component is included a priori and then declared necessary without a leptonic-only comparison. The self-citation to Prince (2021) for previous BLR detection is not load-bearing alone: it is accompanied by Shah (2024) and the paper's own curvature interpretation. Score 5 reflects partial circularity in the central interpretive claims while the main observational findings stand on independent data.

Assumptions & free parameters 10 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The temporal findings (doubling time, log-normal distribution) rest on standard astronomy assumptions about source association and background modeling. The interpretive claims (flare cause, BLR location, hadronic necessity, neutrino candidacy) rest on roughly 25 free SED-fit parameters and a chain of fixed geometric inputs (theta, tau, L_Disk, Doppler factor, blob geometry) taken from the prior literature, including one self-citation (Prince 2021). No new particles or forces are introduced; the proton population is a standard hadronic-model ingredient. The pp-neutrino flux in Figure 8 is a byproduct of the same fit parameters rather than an independent prediction.

free parameters (10)
  • B, magnetic field = 4.24 G
    Fitted to the broadband SED; the claim that the flare was caused by enhancement of the magnetic field is a comparison of this fitted value with earlier epochs fitted with purely leptonic models.
  • Bulk Lorentz factor (Gamma) = 14.11
    Fitted; used in the claim that bulk-factor enhancement promoted the flare and in the emission-region size comparison.
  • Emission region radius (R) = 8.0e14 cm
    Fitted; drives the claim that the emission region is more compact than the variability-based estimate of 1.2e15 cm.
  • Emission region height (R_H) = 1.84e16 cm
    Fitted; the inside-BLR location claim is this number compared with the fixed BLR radii (1.82e16 to 2.00e16 cm).
  • Proton injection density (N_p) = 6.7e6 cm^-3
    Fitted; sets the hadronic luminosity and the neutrino flux, both presented as support for the cosmic-ray and neutrino claims.
  • Target proton density (N_H, pp) = 3.9e6 cm^-3
    Fitted; controls the p-p emissivity used to fit the very-high-energy tail.
  • Electron distribution (6 parameters) = gamma_e,min=18.92, gamma_e,max=2.17e6, gamma_e,break=5.51e2, p_e,1=1.65, p_e,2=6.90, N_e=1.62e4 cm^-3
    Fitted; the harder p_e,1 = 1.65 is used to claim more efficient particle acceleration with less radiative cooling during the flare.
  • Proton distribution (5 parameters) = gamma_p,min=4.0, gamma_p,max=1e6, gamma_p,break=1e3, p_p,1=3.0, p_p,2=4.5
    Fitted; shapes the p-p gamma-ray and neutrino spectra shown in Figure 8.
  • Dust torus temperature and radius (T_DT, R_DT) = 1.19e3 K, 9.99e16 cm
    Fitted; the EC-DT component contributes to the high-energy hump that the paper attributes partly to hadronic emission.
  • Disk temperature (T_Disk) = 7.04e5 K
    Fitted; part of the external-Compton setup in the one-zone model.
assumptions (9)
  • domain assumption One-zone spherical blob emission geometry.
    Used for the size estimate in Eq. (2) and throughout the JetSeT SED modeling in Section 3.4.
  • domain assumption Doppler factor delta = 11.55 from Zhang et al. (2020) applies to the October 2024 flare.
    Adopted from a catalog estimate for a different epoch; enters Eq. (2) and sets the variability-based radius of 1.2e15 cm.
  • domain assumption Curvature of the gamma-ray SED above 10 GeV is caused by gamma-gamma absorption by BLR photons (Liu and Bai 2006).
    Used to infer the existence and location of the BLR (Section 3.2); if the curvature is intrinsic, the BLR-based SED setup loses force.
  • domain assumption Disk luminosity 3.3e43 erg/s and black hole mass 10^8.21 Msun from Chen (2018), with BLR radii from the Kaspi et al. (2007) relations and Thomson depths tau_BLR = tau_DT = 0.1.
    Fixed inputs that determine the BLR radii (1.82e16 to 2.00e16 cm) against which the inside-BLR location is judged, and the Eddington luminosity for the power-budget comparison.
  • domain assumption Viewing angle theta = 0.1 degrees, taken from Shah (2024).
    Fixed for the SED fit; affects the derived sizes and jet luminosities.
  • ad hoc to paper Cold proton to relativistic electron density ratio fixed at 0.1.
    Chosen to break degeneracy in the hadronic fit; directly affects the target-proton density and the hadronic luminosity.
  • domain assumption Only inelastic p-p interactions are included for the hadronic component (JetSeT, Kelner et al. 2006).
    p-gamma interactions are excluded; the paper's hadronic conclusions are conditional on this choice.
  • ad hoc to paper Flare period defined by the HOP condition F_BB >= 3 times the mean flux.
    The choice of MJD 60550 to 60625 as the flaring state shapes all flare-specific statistics (Section 3.1).
  • domain assumption Fermi-LAT source and background model (gll_iem_v072, iso_P8R3_SOURCE_V3_v13) and the gtsrcprob association probabilities are adequate for the ROI.
    Underpins the flux measurements and the claimed detection of the 175.7 GeV photon with >99.99% probability.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of BL Lacertae under the Flare of 2024: Probing Temporal and Spectral Dynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AREDCMKN

@misc{pith2026250518666,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: BL Lacertae under the Flare of 2024: Probing Temporal and Spectral Dynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AREDCMKN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.18666}
}
abstract

In October 2024, the object BL Lacertae experienced the brightest flaring event in gamma-ray ($>$100 MeV) with a historically bright $\gamma$-ray flux of $\sim$2.59 $\times 10^{-5}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ with a detection of a 175.7 GeV photon with Fermi-LAT. This event was also followed by very high-energy $\gamma$-ray detection with LHAASO, VERITAS, and MAGIC. Soon after, Swift-XRT and Swift-UVOT follow-up confirmed the concurrent flare in X-ray, UV, and optical bands. A minimum flux doubling/halving time of 1.06 $\pm$ 0.26 hour with 4$\sigma$ significance has been observed with the Fermi-LAT orbit binned light curve. No compelling correlation has been found between $\gamma$-ray spectral indices and fluxes. The log-normal $\gamma$-ray flux distribution during the flare confirms the multiplicative nature of the non-linear perturbation causing the flare. We applied a one-zone leptohadronic model to fit the broadband SED during the flaring period. The broadband SED modeling reveals that the sudden enhancement of the magnetic field and bulk factor might promote the flare. The SED modeling also suggested a more compact emission region, which may be described by a shorter variability time than the observed one. The hadronic part best fitted the high energy part of the spectrum, suggesting the jets of BL Lac could provide a promising environment to accelerate the cosmic ray particles, such as protons. The jets of BL Lacertae could also be the possible source of astrophysical neutrinos, as an upper limit on neutrinos has already been reported from IceCube.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.18666 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Multi-waveband light curve of BL Lacertae from January 2024 to March 2025. The red vertical line represents the VHE detection by VERITAS and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Fermi-LAT orbit-binned light curve (96 min) from MJD 60585.5 to MJD 60591.5. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Variation of γ-ray flux with the spectral index of the log-parabola model used to fit each of the γ-ray light curve bins. (b) Variation of γ-ray flux with the curvature of the log-parabola model used to fit each of the γ-ray light curve bins. and Finkbeiner (2011). The source magnitude was extracted us￾ing a 3.0 arcsec circular region centered on the source, while the background magnitude was obtained from a 10 … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: We detected the highest energetic photon of 175.7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: γ-ray flux distribution during flaring state. 5 with blue and green points, respectively. Clearly, it is visible that the flux density in the flaring state is much higher than the quiet state in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: γ-ray SEDs for the flaring and quiet states. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Combined Swift-XRT and NuSTAR spectra fitted with a simple [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Flux vs PL index for X-ray observations We combined the Swift-XRT and NuSTAR spectra and per￾formed a combined power-law fit as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The p-p interactions have been used to estimate the high￾energy γ-ray part as they have a parameter space to interpret the γ-ray spectra (Li et al., 2022) and they can explain the VHE spectra (Xue et al., 2022). The p-p interactions are comprised of the following react…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Broadband SED of the flaring state. The grey data points in the background represent the archival average SED state extracted from the SED builder. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , author Ackermann , M

    author Abdo , A.A. , author Ackermann , M. , author Agudo , I. , author Ajello , M. , author Aller , H.D. , author Aller , M.F. , author Angelakis , E. , author Arkharov , A.A. , author Axelsson , M. , author Bach , U. , author Baldini , L. , author Ballet , J. , author Barbiellini , G. , author Bastieri , D. , author Baughman , B.M. , author Bechtol , K....

    arXiv 2010

  2. [2]

    a hteenm \

    author Abdo , A.A. , author Ackermann , M. , author Ajello , M. , author Antolini , E. , author Baldini , L. , author Ballet , J. , author Barbiellini , G. , author Bastieri , D. , author Bechtol , K. , author Bellazzini , R. , author Berenji , B. , author Blandford , R.D. , author Bonamente , E. , author Borgland , A.W. , author Bregeon , J. , author Bre...

    arXiv 2011

  3. [3]

    , author Acero , F

    author Abdollahi , S. , author Acero , F. , author Ackermann , M. , author Ajello , M. , author Atwood , W.B. , author Axelsson , M. , author Baldini , L. , author Ballet , J. , author Barbiellini , G. , author Bastieri , D. , author Becerra Gonzalez , J. , author Bellazzini , R. , author Berretta , A. , author Bissaldi , E. , author Blandford , R.D. , au...

    arXiv 2020

  4. [4]

    , author Abe , K

    author Abe , H. , author Abe , K. , author Abe , S. , author Aguasca-Cabot , A. , author Agudo , I. , author Alvarez Crespo , N. , author Antonelli , L.A. , author Aramo , C. , author Arbet-Engels , A. , author Arcaro , C. , author Artero , M. , author Asano , K. , author Aubert , P. , author Baktash , A. , author Bamba , A. , author Baquero Larriva , A. ...

    work page arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    VERITAS discovery of very high energy gamma-ray emission from S3 1227+25 and multiwavelength observations

    author Acharyya , A. , author Adams , C.B. , author Archer , A. , author Bangale , P. , author Benbow , W. , author Brill , A. , author Christiansen , J.L. , author Chromey , A.J. , author Errando , M. , author Falcone , A. , author Feng , Q. , author Finley , J.P. , author Foote , J. , author Fortson , L. , author Furniss , A. , author Gallagher , G. , a...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Flaring activity from magnetic reconnection in BL Lacertae

    author Agarwal , S. , author Banerjee , B. , author Shukla , A. , author Roy , J. , author Acharya , S. , author Vaidya , B. , author Chitnis , V.R. , author Wagner , S.M. , author Mannheim , K. , author Branchesi , M. , year 2023 . title Flaring activity from magnetic reconnection in BL Lacertae . journal volume 521 , pages L53--L58 . :10.1093/mnrasl/sla...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    , author Ansoldi , S

    author Aleksi \'c , J. , author Ansoldi , S. , author Antonelli , L.A. , author Antoranz , P. , author Babic , A. , author Bangale , P. , author Barrio , J.A. , author Gonz \'a lez , J.B. , author Bednarek , W. , author Bernardini , E. , author Biasuzzi , B. , author Biland , A. , author Blanch , O. , author Bonnefoy , S. , author Bonnoli , G. , author Bo...

    arXiv 2014

  8. [8]

    , author Rees , M.J

    author Blandford , R.D. , author Rees , M.J. , year 1978 . title Extended and compact extragalactic radio sources: interpretation and theory. journal volume 17 , pages 265--274 . :10.1088/0031-8949/17/3/020

    doi:10.1088/0031-8949/17/3/020 1978

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    , author Landsman , W

    author Breeveld , A.A. , author Landsman , W. , author Holland , S.T. , author Roming , P. , author Kuin , N.P.M. , author Page , M.J. , year 2011 . title An Updated Ultraviolet Calibration for the Swift/UVOT , in: editor McEnery , J.E. , editor Racusin , J.L. , editor Gehrels...

    2011 arXiv

  2. [10]

    , author Aharonian , F

    author Cao , Z. , author Aharonian , F. , author Axikegu , author Bai , Y.X. , author Bao , Y.W. , author Bastieri , D. , author Bi , X.J. , author Bi , Y.J. , author Bian , W. , author Bukevich , A.V. , author Cao , Q. , author Cao , W.Y. , author Cao , Z. , author Chang , J....

    2024

  3. [11]

    , year 2018

    author Chen , L. , year 2018 . title On the Jet Properties of -Ray-loud Active Galactic Nuclei . journal volume 235 , pages 39 . :10.3847/1538-4365/aab8fb, http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.05715 arXiv:1803.05715

    2018 arXiv

  4. [12]

    , year 2022

    author D'Ammando , F. , year 2022 . title NICER, NuSTAR, and Swift follow-up observations of the -ray flaring blazar BL Lacertae in 2020 August-October . journal volume 509 , pages 52--67 . :10.1093/mnras/stab2616, http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.05660 arXiv:2107.05660

    2022 arXiv

  5. [13]

    , author Schlickeiser , R

    author Dermer , C.D. , author Schlickeiser , R. , author Mastichiadis , A. , year 1992 . title High-energy gamma radiation from extragalactic radio sources. journal volume 256 , pages L27--L30

    1992

  6. [14]

    , author Hut , P

    author Eisenstein , D.J. , author Hut , P. , year 1998 . title HOP: A New Group-Finding Algorithm for N-Body Simulations . journal volume 498 , pages 137--142 . :10.1086/305535, http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9712200 arXiv:astro-ph/9712200

    1998 arXiv

  7. [15]

    , author Beardmore , A.P

    author Evans , P.A. , author Beardmore , A.P. , author Page , K.L. , author Osborne , J.P. , author O'Brien , P.T. , author Willingale , R. , author Starling , R.L.C. , author Burrows , D.N. , author Godet , O. , author Vetere , L. , author Racusin , J. , author Goad , M.R. , ...

    2009

  8. [16]

    , author Ghisellini , G

    author Foschini , L. , author Ghisellini , G. , author Tavecchio , F. , author Bonnoli , G. , author Stamerra , A. , year 2011 . title Search for the shortest variability at gamma rays in flat-spectrum radio quasars . journal volume 530 , pages A77 . :10.1051/0004-6361/2011170...

    2011 arXiv

  9. [17]

    , author Rodighiero , G

    author Franceschini , A. , author Rodighiero , G. , author Vaccari , M. , year 2008 . title Extragalactic optical-infrared background radiation, its time evolution and the cosmic photon-photon opacity . journal volume 487 , pages 837--852 . :10.1051/0004-6361:200809691, http:/...

    2008 arXiv

  10. [18]

    , year 2024

    author Furniss , A.F.V.C. , year 2024 . title VERITAS Detection of Gamma-ray Flaring Activity from BL Lacertae . journal The Astronomer's Telegram volume 16854 , pages 1

    2024

  11. [19]

    , author Fedynitch , A

    author Gao , S. , author Fedynitch , A. , author Winter , W. , author Pohl , M. , year 2019 . title Modelling the coincident observation of a high-energy neutrino and a bright blazar flare . journal Nature Astronomy volume 3 , pages 88--92 . :10.1038/s41550-018-0610-1, http://...

    2019 arXiv

  12. [20]

    , author Konno , R

    author Garrappa , S. , author Konno , R. , author Ofek , E.O. , author Ben-Ami , S. , author Polishook , D. , author Chen , P. , author Gal-Yam , A. , author Krassilchtchikov , A. , author Rybicki , K. , author Segre , E. , author Shani , Y.M. , author Spitzer , S. , year 2024...

    2024

  13. [21]

    , author Tavecchio , F

    author Ghisellini , G. , author Tavecchio , F. , year 2015 . title Fermi/LAT broad emission line blazars . journal volume 448 , pages 1060--1077 . :10.1093/mnras/stv055, http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.03504 arXiv:1501.03504

    2015 arXiv

  14. [22]

    , author Miller , J.S

    author Hawley , S.A. , author Miller , J.S. , year 1977 . title Strong [N II] emission and abundances in the Ring Nebula. journal volume 212 , pages 94--101 . :10.1086/155023

    1977 doi

  15. [23]

    , author Fl \"o er , L

    author HI4PI Collaboration , author Ben Bekhti , N. , author Fl \"o er , L. , author Keller , R. , author Kerp , J. , author Lenz , D. , author Winkel , B. , author Bailin , J. , author Calabretta , M.R. , author Dedes , L. , author Ford , H.A. , author Gibson , B.K. , author ...

    2016 arXiv

  16. [24]

    , author Prince , R

    author Kamaram , S.R. , author Prince , R. , author Pramanick , S. , author Bose , D. , year 2023 . title Multifrequency variability study of flat-spectrum radio quasar PKS 0346-27 . journal volume 520 , pages 2024--2038 . :10.1093/mnras/stad167, http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.0471...

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    , author Brandt , W.N

    author Kaspi , S. , author Brandt , W.N. , author Maoz , D. , author Netzer , H. , author Schneider , D.P. , author Shemmer , O. , year 2007 . title Reverberation Mapping of High-Luminosity Quasars: First Results . journal volume 659 , pages 997--1007 . :10.1086/512094, http:/...

    2007 arXiv

  18. [26]

    , author Aharonian , F.A

    author Kelner , S.R. , author Aharonian , F.A. , author Bugayov , V.V. , year 2006 . title Energy spectra of gamma rays, electrons, and neutrinos produced at proton-proton interactions in the very high energy regime . journal volume 74 , pages 034018 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.74.034...

    2006 arXiv

  19. [27]

    , author Gupta , A.C

    author Kishore , S. , author Gupta , A.C. , year 2024 . title The blazar BL Lacertae is brightening in Optical bands . journal The Astronomer's Telegram volume 16856 , pages 1

    2024

  20. [28]

    , author Villata , M

    author Larionov , V.M. , author Villata , M. , author Raiteri , C.M. , author Jorstad , S.G. , author Marscher , A.P. , author Agudo , I. , author Smith , P.S. , author Acosta-Pulido , J.A. , author \'A r \'e valo , M.J. , author Arkharov , A.A. , author Bachev , R. , author B...

    2016 arXiv

  21. [29]

    , author Xue , R

    author Li , W.J. , author Xue , R. , author Long , G.B. , author Wang , Z.R. , author Nagataki , S. , author Yan , D.H. , author Wang , J.C. , year 2022 . title Can the one-zone hadronuclear model explain the hard-TeV spectrum of BL Lac objects? journal volume 659 , pages A184...

    2022 arXiv

  22. [30]

    , author Bai , J.M

    author Liu , H.T. , author Bai , J.M. , year 2006 . title Absorption of 10-200 GeV Gamma Rays by Radiation from Broad-Line Regions in Blazars . journal volume 653 , pages 1089--1097 . :10.1086/509097, http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.3135 arXiv:0807.3135

    2006 arXiv

  23. [31]

    , year 2010

    author McHardy , I. , year 2010 . title X-Ray Variability of AGN and Relationship to Galactic Black Hole Binary Systems , in: editor Belloni , T. (Ed.), booktitle Lecture Notes in Physics, Berlin Springer Verlag . volume volume 794 , p. pages 203 . :10.1007/978-3-540-76937-8_8

    2010 doi

  24. [32]

    , year 2021

    author Mura , G.L. , year 2021 . title Fermi-LAT detection of enhanced gamma-ray activity from BL Lac . journal The Astronomer's Telegram volume 14583 , pages 1

    2021

  25. [33]

    , author Xiao , H

    author Ouyang , Z. , author Xiao , H. , author Manganaro , M. , author Xie , S. , author Wu , J. , author Chen , J. , author Xue , R. , author Wang , G. , author Zhang , S. , author Fan , J. , year 2025 . title Revisiting the Flaring Activity in Early 2015 of BL Lacertae Objec...

    2025 arXiv

  26. [34]

    , author Stalin , C.S

    author Pandey , A. , author Stalin , C.S. , year 2022 . title Detection of minute-timescale -ray variability in BL Lacertae by Fermi-LAT . journal volume 668 , pages A152 . :10.1051/0004-6361/202244648, http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.00799 arXiv:2210.00799

    2022 arXiv

  27. [35]

    , author Nozaki , S

    author Paneque , D. , author Nozaki , S. , author Bonnoli , G. , author Arbet-Engels , A. , author Garcia Soto , S. , author Imazawa , R. , year 2024 . title Detection of flaring very-high-energy gamma-ray emission from BL Lacertae with the MAGIC telescopes . journal The Astro...

    2024

  28. [36]

    , year 2021

    author Prince , R. , year 2021 . title Broad-band study of BL Lac during flare of 2020: spectral evolution and emergence of HBL component . journal volume 507 , pages 5602--5612 . :10.1093/mnras/stab2486, http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.00221 arXiv:2105.00221

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    , author Khatoon , R

    author Prince , R. , author Khatoon , R. , author Stalin , C.S. , year 2021 . title Broad-band study of OQ 334 during its flaring state . journal volume 502 , pages 5245--5258 . :10.1093/mnras/stab369, http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.03516 arXiv:2102.03516

    2021 arXiv

  30. [38]

    , author Stalin , C.S

    author Rajput , B. , author Stalin , C.S. , author Rakshit , S. , year 2020 . title Long term -ray variability of blazars . journal volume 634 , pages A80 . :10.1051/0004-6361/201936769, http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.01105 arXiv:2001.01105

    2020 arXiv

  31. [39]

    , author Giommi , P

    author Sahakyan , N. , author Giommi , P. , year 2022 . title A 13-yr-long broad-band view of BL Lac . journal volume 513 , pages 4645--4656 . :10.1093/mnras/stac1011, http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.12232 arXiv:2108.12232

    2022 arXiv

  32. [40]

    , author Norris , J.P

    author Scargle , J.D. , author Norris , J.P. , author Jackson , B. , author Chiang , J. , year 2013 . title Studies in Astronomical Time Series Analysis. VI. Bayesian Block Representations . journal volume 764 , pages 167 . :10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/167, http://arxiv.org/abs/12...

    2013 arXiv

  33. [41]

    , author Finkbeiner , D.P

    author Schlafly , E.F. , author Finkbeiner , D.P. , year 2011 . title Measuring Reddening with Sloan Digital Sky Survey Stellar Spectra and Recalibrating SFD . journal volume 737 , pages 103 . :10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103, http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.4804 arXiv:1012.4804

    2011 arXiv

  34. [42]

    , year 2024

    author Shah , Z. , year 2024 . title Multiwavelength variability and broad-band SED modelling of BL Lac during a bright flaring period MJD 59000-59943 . journal volume 527 , pages 5140--5154 . :10.1093/mnras/stad3534, http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.08749 arXiv:2311.08749

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    , author Mankuzhiyil , N

    author Shah , Z. , author Mankuzhiyil , N. , author Sinha , A. , author Misra , R. , author Sahayanathan , S. , author Iqbal , N. , year 2018 . title Log-normal flux distribution of bright Fermi blazars . journal Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics volume 18 , pages 141 . :...

    2018 arXiv

  36. [44]

    , author Kamaram , S.R

    author Sharma , A. , author Kamaram , S.R. , author Prince , R. , author Khatoon , R. , author Bose , D. , year 2024 . title Probing the disc-jet coupling in S4 0954+65, PKS 0903-57, and 4C +01.02 with -rays . journal volume 527 , pages 2672--2686 . :10.1093/mnras/stad3399, ht...

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    , author Mannheim , K

    author Shukla , A. , author Mannheim , K. , year 2020 . title Gamma-ray flares from relativistic magnetic reconnection in the jet of the quasar 3C 279 . journal Nature Communications volume 11 , pages 4176 . :10.1038/s41467-020-17912-z

    2020 doi

  38. [46]

    , author Mannheim , K

    author Shukla , A. , author Mannheim , K. , author Patel , S.R. , author Roy , J. , author Chitnis , V.R. , author Dorner , D. , author Rao , A.R. , author Anupama , G.C. , author Wendel , C. , year 2018 . title Short-timescale -Ray Variability in CTA 102 . journal volume 854 ...

    2018 doi

  39. [47]

    , author Begelman , M.C

    author Sikora , M. , author Begelman , M.C. , author Rees , M.J. , year 1994 . title Comptonization of Diffuse Ambient Radiation by a Relativistic Jet: The Source of Gamma Rays from Blazars? journal volume 421 , pages 153 . :10.1086/173633

    1994 doi

  40. [48]

    , author Stawarz ,

    author Sikora , M. , author Stawarz , . , author Moderski , R. , author Nalewajko , K. , author Madejski , G.M. , year 2009 . title Constraining Emission Models of Luminous Blazar Sources . journal volume 704 , pages 38--50 . :10.1088/0004-637X/704/1/38, http://arxiv.org/abs/0...

    2009 arXiv

  41. [49]

    , author Carswell , R.F

    author Smith , M.G. , author Carswell , R.F. , author Whelan , J.A.J. , author Wilkes , B.J. , author Boksenberg , A. , author Clowes , R.G. , author Savage , A. , author Cannon , R.D. , author Wall , J.V. , year 1981 . title Observations of the Lyman limit in 19 QSOs. journal...

    1981 doi

  42. [50]

    , author Majumdar , P

    author Sunanda , author Moharana , R. , author Majumdar , P. , year 2022 . title Proton synchrotron, an explanation for possible extended VHE gamma-ray activity of TXS 0506 +056 in 2017 . journal volume 106 , pages 123005 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.106.123005, http://arxiv.org/abs/22...

    2022 arXiv

  43. [51]

    , year 2020

    author Tramacere , A. , year 2020 . title JetSeT: Numerical modeling and SED fitting tool for relativistic jets . howpublished Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2009.001

    2020

  44. [52]

    , author Giommi , P

    author Tramacere , A. , author Giommi , P. , author Perri , M. , author Verrecchia , F. , author Tosti , G. , year 2009 . title Swift observations of the very intense flaring activity of Mrk 421 during 2006. I. Phenomenological picture of electron acceleration and predictions ...

    2009 arXiv

  45. [53]

    , author Massaro , E

    author Tramacere , A. , author Massaro , E. , author Taylor , A.M. , year 2011 . title Stochastic Acceleration and the Evolution of Spectral Distributions in Synchro-Self-Compton Sources: A Self-consistent Modeling of Blazars' Flares . journal volume 739 , pages 66 . :10.1088/...

    2011 arXiv

  46. [54]

    , author Padovani , P

    author Urry , C.M. , author Padovani , P. , year 1995 . title Unified Schemes for Radio-Loud Active Galactic Nuclei . journal volume 107 , pages 803 . :10.1086/133630, http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9506063 arXiv:astro-ph/9506063

    1995 arXiv

  47. [55]

    , author McHardy , I.M

    author Uttley , P. , author McHardy , I.M. , author Vaughan , S. , year 2005 . title Non-linear X-ray variability in X-ray binaries and active galaxies . journal volume 359 , pages 345--362 . :10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08886.x, http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0502112 arXiv:astro-...

    2005

  48. [56]

    , author La Mura , G

    author van Zyl , P.V. , author La Mura , G. , author Bernard , D. , year 2024 . title Fermi-LAT detection of enhanced gamma-ray activity from the blazar BL Lacertae . journal The Astronomer's Telegram volume 16849 , pages 1

    2024

  49. [57]

    , author Edelson , R

    author Vaughan , S. , author Edelson , R. , author Warwick , R.S. , author Uttley , P. , year 2003 . title On characterizing the variability properties of X-ray light curves from active galaxies . journal volume 345 , pages 1271--1284 . :10.1046/j.1365-2966.2003.07042.x, http:...

    2003

  50. [58]

    , author Burd , P

    author Wagner , S.M. , author Burd , P. , author Dorner , D. , author Mannheim , K. , author Buson , S. , author Gokus , A. , author Madejski , G. , author Scargle , J. , author Arbet-Engels , A. , author Baack , D. , author Balbo , M. , author Biland , A. , author Bretz , T. ...

    2022 arXiv

  51. [59]

    , author Jiang , Y.G

    author Wang , J.T. , author Jiang , Y.G. , year 2025 . title The multiwavelength variability of BL Lacertae: changes from an IBL to an HBL in multiple epochs . journal volume 536 , pages 1251--1267 . :10.1093/mnras/stae2609

    2025 doi

  52. [60]

    , author Williamson , K.E

    author Weaver , Z.R. , author Williamson , K.E. , author Jorstad , S.G. , author Marscher , A.P. , author Larionov , V.M. , author Raiteri , C.M. , author Villata , M. , author Acosta-Pulido , J.A. , author Bachev , R. , author Baida , G.V. , author Balonek , T.J. , author Ben...

    2020 arXiv

  53. [61]

    , author Caputo , R

    author Wood , M. , author Caputo , R. , author Charles , E. , author Di Mauro , M. , author Magill , J. , author Perkins , J.S. , author Fermi-LAT Collaboration , year 2017 . title Fermipy: An open-source Python package for analysis of Fermi-LAT Data , in: booktitle 35th Inter...

    2017 arXiv

  54. [62]

    , author Zha , M

    author Xiang , G. , author Zha , M. , author Yao , Z. , author Zhou , J. , author Xing , Y. , year 2024 . title LHAASO detects rapid variability of the TeV Gamma-ray Activity of BL Lacertae . journal The Astronomer's Telegram volume 16850 , pages 1

    2024

  55. [63]

    , author Wang , Z.R

    author Xue , R. , author Wang , Z.R. , author Li , W.J. , year 2022 . title Hadronuclear interactions in the jet of low TeV luminosity AGN: Implications for the low-state very-high-energy gamma-ray emission . journal volume 106 , pages 103021 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103021, ht...

    2022 arXiv

  56. [64]

    , author Chen , S

    author Zhang , L. , author Chen , S. , author Xiao , H. , author Cai , J. , author Fan , J. , year 2020 . title Doppler Factor Estimation for Fermi Blazars . journal volume 897 , pages 10 . :10.3847/1538-4357/ab9180

    2020 doi

  57. [65]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.