Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Local asymptotics for singular solutions to critical Hartree equations

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Singular solutions to critical Hartree equations are controlled by a single radial blow-up profile near an isolated singularity.

desk verdict Theorem 1.2 is not proven in this version—the lower-bound half is deferred to an unstated removable classification theorem—but the symmetry result and the moving-spheres adaptation are real contributions worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.19021 v1 pith:ZWZEPXN5 submitted 2025-05-25 math.AP

João Henrique Andrade , Tao Feng , Paolo Piccione , Minbo Yang This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35J6035B0935J3035B40
keywords criticalHartreeequationisolatedsingularitieslocalasymptoticsradialsymmetryintegralmovingspheresKelvintransformHardy-Littlewood-Sobolevexponentblow-uplimitsolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that every positive solution of the critical Hartree equation that blows up at an isolated point behaves, asymptotically, like one universal radial profile: as $x\to 0$, $u(x)=(1+o(1))u_\infty(|x|)$, where $u_\infty$ solves the corresponding equation on the punctured space. The second main claim is that all such blow-up profiles on the whole punctured space are radially symmetric about the singularity and monotonically decreasing. If true, this means that isolated singularities of critical Hartree equations are not wild: their local geometry is pinned by a single function, and the question of whether the singularity is removable or supports periodic Delaunay-type behavior becomes a one-dimensional problem. The work also contributes an asymptotic integral moving-spheres method adapted to double-convolution kernels, presented as a technique of independent interest. A sympathetic reading takes the main theorems as extending the classical analysis of critical semilinear equations with isolated singularities to nonlocal Hartree nonlinearities.

What carries the argument

The engine is an integral moving-spheres method run in asymptotic form. Solutions of the differential equation are first shown to satisfy an equivalent integral equation $u=R_2*[(R_\alpha*F(u))f(u)]+h$ locally, with $R_2$ and $R_\alpha$ the Riesz kernels of the Laplacian and of the Hartree interaction; the technique then compares $u$ with its Kelvin transform $u_{x,\mu}(z)=(\mu/|z-x|)^{n-2}u(x+\mu^2(z-x)/|z-x|^2)$ and uses positivity of the two kernels $K_2$ and $K_\alpha$ to show the transform stays below $u$ up to the critical radius. In the blow-up argument this comparison is applied to renormalized sequences converging to a classified bubble, forcing a contradiction unless the upper bound holds; the lower bound is meant to follow from a removable-singularity classification theorem governed by the sign of a Pohozaev invariant. The double convolution kernel is the main technical obstacle, and the paper's new estimates control the difference between a solution and its Kelvin transform in the presence of that double convolution.

What would settle it

One concrete check: take a positive singular solution of $(P_{n,\alpha,R})$ in $L^{2^*_\alpha}(B_R)$ and evaluate $\liminf_{x\to 0}|x|^{(n-2)/2}u(x)$; Theorem 1.2 predicts this limit equals the corresponding finite positive value of the limiting profile $u_\infty$. Finding a solution with $\liminf=0$ but $\limsup=\infty$ would refute (1.7). Alternatively, writing out the announced removable classification theorem and verifying its hypotheses for $L^{2^*_\alpha}$ solutions would settle whether the lower bound currently follows.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central discovery is Theorem 1.2: if $u\in C^\infty(B_R\setminus\{0\})\cap L^{2^*_\alpha}(B_R)$ is a positive singular solution of $-\Delta u=(R_\alpha*F(u))f(u)$ in the punctured ball $B_R$, then $u(x)=(1+o(1))u_\infty(|x|)$ as $x\to 0$ for a blow-up limit solution $u_\infty$ of the same equation on $\mathbb{R}^n\setminus\{0\}$. The force of the statement is that the convergence is not along a subsequence but as a full limit with a single limiting profile, so the local blow-up rate $|x|^{(n-2)/2}u(x)$ is asymptotically radial and universal. Complementarily, Theorem 1.1 asserts that any positive singular solution in $C^2(\mathbb{R}^n\setminus\{0\})\cap L^{2^*_\alpha}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ of the blow-up limit equation is radially symmetric about the origin and decreasing in $|x|$. Together these reduce the classification of isolated singularities to the study of radial solutions and set up the paper's conjecture that refined asymptotics are given by periodic Delaunay solutions with exponentially small error.

Load-bearing premise

The lower-bound half of Theorem 1.2 depends on a removable-singularity classification theorem, based on the sign of a Pohozaev invariant, that the paper mentions but neither states, proves, nor cites, and whose hypotheses may require stronger integrability than the $L^{2^*_\alpha}$ assumption of the theorem.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Theorem 1.2 pins the singularity: any positive solution that blows up at an isolated point has the same leading profile as a solution on the punctured space, up to a factor $1+o(1)$.
  • Theorem 1.1 turns the blow-up limit equation into a one-dimensional problem: radial symmetry and monotonicity justify the Emden–Fowler change of variables used for Delaunay-type analysis.
  • The upper-bound estimate $|x|^{(n-2)/2}u(x)$ bounded near the origin and the asymptotic radial symmetry result hold for positive solutions of the integral equation under $L^{(n+2)/(n-2)}$ integrability.
  • The asymptotic integral moving-spheres technique becomes available for nonlocal critical equations with double-convolution structure, not just for local conformally invariant equations.
  • The conjectured refined asymptotics with Delaunay solutions would give the blow-up rate in terms of indicial roots of the linearized operator, completing the classical picture for critical equations with isolated singularities.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A likely extension: the same asymptotic moving-spheres scheme should apply to Choquard-type systems and to fractional Hartree equations, where the same double-convolution structure appears with different Riesz kernels.
  • If the removable classification theorem implied by the text exists and holds under $L^{2^*_\alpha}$ integrability, then Theorem 1.2 would also rule out intermediate blow-up profiles, leaving only the bubble profile and periodic Delaunay profiles as candidates.
  • The Pohozaev invariant mentioned in Section 4, if properly defined, could give a sign test to distinguish removable singularities from Delaunay-type behavior in explicit radial solutions.
  • Refined asymptotics of the type in Conjecture 1.3 would connect Hartree singularities to the constant-scalar-curvature and constant-$Q$-curvature literature, where the same Delaunay family and indicial-root analysis appear.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies positive singular solutions of the critical Hartree equation -Δu = (R_α * F(u)) f(u) in punctured domains and in R^n \ {0}. It claims two main results: Theorem 1.1, asserting that entire singular solutions in R^n \ {0} are radially symmetric about the origin and monotonically decreasing, and Theorem 1.2, asserting that singular solutions in a punctured ball satisfy u(x) = (1+o(1))u_∞(|x|) as x → 0 for a blow-up limit solution u_∞ of the limit equation. The authors develop an asymptotic integral moving-spheres method, prove an integral representation, and derive a sharp upper bound and asymptotic spherical symmetry for solutions under stronger integrability assumptions.

Significance. If fully established, Theorem 1.2 would be a substantial extension of the Caffarelli–Gidas–Spruck local-asymptotics theory to critical Hartree equations, and the asymptotic integral moving-spheres technique developed in the paper would be of independent interest. The proof of Theorem 1.1 is long and structurally detailed, and the upper-bound part of Theorem 1.2 (Proposition 4.6) and the asymptotic radial symmetry part (Proposition 4.7) are argued in detail. However, the paper's headline Theorem 1.2 is not actually proved: the lower-bound half is deferred to an unstated external theorem, and the final identification of the limit profile is never carried out. As submitted, the central claim is therefore unsupported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4, after Proposition 4.3] The lower-bound half of Theorem 1.2 is deferred to an unstated 'removable classification theorem, which is based on the sign of the so-called Pohozaev invariant.' No such theorem is stated, proved, or cited anywhere in the manuscript, and the invariant is never defined. The conclusion (1.7) requires a positive lower bound on |x|^{(n-2)/2}u(x) (or an equivalent control) to exclude vanishing and to identify a nonzero blow-up limit; without the missing theorem, the lower bound is simply absent. As a consequence, Theorem 1.2, the paper's headline result, is not proven.
  2. [Propositions 4.6 and 4.7] Both propositions assume u∈C(B*_2)∩L^{(n+2)/(n-2)}(B_2), whereas Theorem 1.2 assumes only u∈L^{2*_α}(B_R)=L^{(n+α)/(n-2)}(B_R). For α∈(0,2) the former integrability is strictly stronger, and the manuscript gives no bootstrap from L^{2*_α} to L^{(n+2)/(n-2)}. Hence even the upper-bound estimate and the asymptotic radial symmetry are not established under the hypotheses of Theorem 1.2.
  3. [Section 4, end] The proof of Theorem 1.2 ends with Proposition 4.7; the passage from the upper bound and the spherical-average asymptotics u(x)=ū(|x|)(1+O(|x|)) to the asserted existence of a single blow-up limit profile u_∞∈C^∞(R^n\{0}) satisfying (1.7) is never written. Since the blow-up procedure in Proposition 4.6 produces a limit only along a subsequence, additional compactness and identification arguments are required, and these are not supplied.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Title page] The title is typeset as 'HAR TREE EQUA TIONS' instead of 'HARTREE EQUATIONS'.
  2. [Introduction, literature discussion] The sentence 'by an earlier result by Chen, Li and Ou [26]' cites reference [26], which is Jin, Li, and Xiong; the intended citation is presumably [9].
  3. [Section 4.1, after Proposition 4.3] The phrase 'and sacling' appears where 'and scaling' is meant.
  4. [Proposition 3.4] The statement claims the integral representation (3.11) for x∈R^n, but since u is singular at the origin, the statement should presumably be for x∈R^n\{0} or should otherwise clarify the meaning at x=0.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main theorems are derived from external classification and moving-spheres results, not from restatements of the target; the Section 4 lower-bound gap is an omitted proof, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain does not reduce to its own inputs. Theorem 1.1 is proved by an integral moving-spheres argument adapted from Jin, Li and Xiong [26,27], with a Kelvin-transform invariance verified by direct computation (Proposition 2.2). The identified limiting profile in Theorem 1.2 comes from Theorem B, the external Liouville/classification theorem for entire non-singular Hartree bubbles, cited to [40,12,19,29]; although two of those works include coauthor M. Yang, they are parameter-free published classifications whose assumptions do not include the singular-asymptotics conclusion, so they are independent support rather than a circular self-citation chain. The upper-bound Proposition 4.6 and the asymptotic-symmetry Proposition 4.7 use the standard blow-up argument plus moving spheres and are not fitted-input-called-prediction. The only serious concern is flagged by the manuscript itself: Section 4 states, 'For the proof of the lower bound estimates, we rely on a removable classification theorem, which is based on the sign of the so-called Pohozaev invariant,' yet no such theorem is stated, proved, or cited and the invariant is not defined. This is a load-bearing omitted proof, and the stated hypotheses of Propositions 4.6 and 4.7 (L^{(n+2)/(n-2)}) are stronger than the L^{2*_alpha} assumption of Theorem 1.2, so the theorem is not fully established by the written arguments. But an omitted or inapplicable theorem is a correctness gap, not circularity: there is no quote or equation showing the conclusion is equivalent to the inputs by construction. No self-definitional, fitted-input-as-prediction, or ansatz-smuggled-via-citation pattern appears. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard HLS/Sobolev tools and published classifications, plus one ad hoc unstated theorem (the removable classification / Pohozaev invariant) that is load-bearing for the lower bound. No free parameters are fitted; the missing theorem is the main unresolved dependency.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality with sharp constant (Theorem A)
    Used in Section 1 to define the critical exponent and the sharp constant; a standard external result.
  • standard math Classification of positive entire solutions to (P_{n,α}) (Theorem B)
    Invoked in Prop 4.6 to identify the blow-up limit w_0 as a bubble, Eq. (4.12). Cited from [40,12,19,29], including works coauthored by M. Yang, but published and parameter-free.
  • standard math Liouville theorem for harmonic functions in L^0(R^n) from [2]
    Used in Prop 3.4 to conclude that w = u - m_u vanishes after establishing w∈L^0(R^n).
  • standard math Moving-spheres lemmas of Li-Zhang [33] (Lemma A and Lemma B)
    Core to the contradiction argument in Prop 4.6; treated as an external established tool.
  • domain assumption Regularity and integral-representation theory for Hartree equations from [32, 41, 13]
    Used to pass from the rescaled sequence w_k to C^2_loc convergence and to justify local integral equations; relies on known elliptic and Choquard regularity.
  • ad hoc to paper Unstated removable classification theorem based on a Pohozaev-type invariant
    Explicitly invoked in the Section 4 preamble as the basis for the lower-bound estimates, but never stated, proved, or cited. This is a load-bearing missing premise for Theorem 1.2.
invented entities (1)
  • Pohozaev invariant (homological invariant)
    purpose: Intended to prove the removable-singularity classification that yields the lower bound in Theorem 1.2.
    Mentioned in the Section 4 preamble as 'of independent interest', but never defined, computed, or used anywhere in the manuscript; no falsifiable handle is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Local asymptotics for singular solutions to critical Hartree equations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZWZEPXN5

@misc{pith2026250519021,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Local asymptotics for singular solutions to critical Hartree equations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZWZEPXN5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.19021}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the qualitative properties of a critical Hartree equation defined on punctured domains. Our study has two main objectives: analyzing the asymptotic behavior near isolated singularities and establishing radial symmetry of positive singular solutions. First, employing asymptotic analysis, we characterize the local behavior of solutions near the singularity. Specifically, we show that, within a punctured ball, solutions behave like the blow-up limit profile. This is achieved through classification results for entire bubble solutions, a standard blow-up procedure, and a removable singularity theorem, yielding sharp upper and lower bounds near the origin. To run the blow-up analysis, we develop an asymptotic integral version of the moving spheres technique, a technique of independent interest. Second, we establish the radial symmetry of blow-up limit solutions using an integral moving spheres method. On the technical level, we apply the integral dual method from Jin, Li, Xiong \cite{MR3694645, arxiv:1901.01678} to provide local asymptotic estimates within the punctured ball and to prove that solutions in the entire punctured space are radially symmetric with respect to the origin. Our results extend seminal theorems of Caffarelli, Gidas, and Spruck \cite{MR982351} to the setting of Hartree equations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Delaunay solutions to the fractional Hartree equation with critical growth

    math.AP 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Radial symmetry and existence of nonconstant periodic singular (Delaunay-type) solutions are established for the critical fractional Hartree equation with a Riesz convolution.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    J. H. Andrade and J. M. do ´O, Asymptotics for singular solutions to conformally invariant fourth order systems in the punctured ball,J. Differential Equations413(2024) 190–239

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    W. Ao, M. d. M. Gonz´ alez, A. Hyder and J. Wei, Removability of singularities and superharmonicity for some fractional Laplacian equations,Indiana Univ. Math. J.71(2022) 735–766

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Aubin, Probl` emes isop´ erim´ etriques et espaces de Sobolev,J

    T. Aubin, Probl` emes isop´ erim´ etriques et espaces de Sobolev,J. Differential Geometry11(1976) 573–598. 34 J.H. ANDRADE, T. FENG, P. PICCIONE, AND M. YANG

    work page 1976

  4. [4]

    Caffarelli, T

    L. Caffarelli, T. Jin, Y. Sire and J. Xiong, Local analysis of solutions of fractional semi-linear elliptic equations with isolated singularities,Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.213(2014) 245–268

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Caffarelli, B

    L. Caffarelli, B. Gidas and J. Spruck, Asymptotic symmetry and local behavior of semilinear elliptic equations with critical Sobolev growth,Comm. Pure Appl. Math.42(1989) 271–297

    work page 1989

  6. [6]

    Chen and F

    H. Chen and F. Zhou, Classification of isolated singularities of positive solutions for Choquard equations,J. Differential Equations261(2016) 6668–6698

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Chen and C

    W. Chen and C. Li, A necessary and sufficient condition for the Nirenberg problem,Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 48(1995) 657–667

    work page 1995

  8. [8]

    W. Chen, C. Li and B. Ou, Qualitative properties of solutions for an integral equation,Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.12(2005) 347–354

    work page 2005

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    W. Chen, C. Li and B. Ou, Classification of solutions for an integral equation,Comm. Pure Appl. Math.59 (2006) 330–343

    2006

  2. [10]

    W. Dai, Z. Liu and G. Qin, Classification of nonnegative solutions to static Schr¨ odinger-Hartree-Maxwell type equations,SIAM J. Math. Anal.53(2021) 1379–1410

    2021

  3. [11]

    DelaTorre, M

    A. DelaTorre, M. del Pino, M. d. M. Gonz´ alez and J. Wei, Delaunay-type singular solutions for the fractional Yamabe problem,Math. Ann.369(2017) 597–626

    2017

  4. [12]

    Du and M

    L. Du and M. Yang, Uniqueness and nondegeneracy of solutions for a critical nonlocal equation,Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.39(2019) 5847–5866

    2019

  5. [13]

    Du and H

    X. Du and H. Yang, Local behavior of positive solutions of higher order conformally invariant equations with a singular set,Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations60(2021) Paper No. 204, 35

    2021

  6. [14]

    Emden,Gaskugeln: Anwendungen der mechanischen W¨ armetheorie auf kosmologische und meteorologische Probleme, Leipzig, Berlin, B.G

    R. Emden,Gaskugeln: Anwendungen der mechanischen W¨ armetheorie auf kosmologische und meteorologische Probleme, Leipzig, Berlin, B.G. Teubner (1907)

    1907

  7. [15]

    R. H. Fowler, Further studies on Emden’s and similar differential equations,Quart. J. Math.2(1931) 259–288

    1931

  8. [16]

    R. L. Frank and T. K¨ onig, Classification of positive singular solutions to a nonlinear biharmonic equation with critical exponent,Anal. PDE12(2019) 1101–1113

    2019

  9. [17]

    Fr¨ ohlich, Theory of electrical breakdown in ionic crystal,Proc

    H. Fr¨ ohlich, Theory of electrical breakdown in ionic crystal,Proc. R. Soc. Ser. A160(1937) 230–241

    1937

  10. [18]

    Fr¨ ohlich, Electrons in lattice fields,Adv

    H. Fr¨ ohlich, Electrons in lattice fields,Adv. Phys.3(2003)

    2003

  11. [19]

    Gao and M

    F. Gao and M. Yang, The Brezis-Nirenberg type critical problem for the nonlinear Choquard equation,Sci. China Math.61(2018) 1219–1242

    2018

  12. [20]

    Ghergu and S

    M. Ghergu and S. D. Taliaferro, Asymptotic behavior at isolated singularities for solutions of nonlocal semilinear elliptic systems of inequalities,Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations54(2015) 1243–1273

    2015

  13. [21]

    Ghergu and S

    M. Ghergu and S. D. Taliaferro, Pointwise bounds and blow-up for Choquard-Pekar inequalities at an isolated singularity,J. Differential Equations261(2016) 189–217

    2016

  14. [22]

    Gidas, W

    B. Gidas, W. M. Ni and L. Nirenberg, Symmetry and related properties via the maximum principle,Comm. Math. Phys.68(1979) 209–243

    1979

  15. [23]

    L. Guo, T. Hu, S. Peng and W. Shuai, Existence and uniqueness of solutions for Choquard equation involving Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev critical exponent,Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations58(2019) Paper No. 128, 34

    2019

  16. [24]

    Z. Guo, X. Huang, L. Wang and J. Wei, On Delaunay solutions of a biharmonic elliptic equation with critical exponent,J. Anal. Math.140(2020) 371–394

    2020

  17. [25]

    G. H. Hardy and J. E. Littlewood, Some properties of fractional integrals. I,Math. Z.27(1928) 565–606

    1928

  18. [26]

    T. Jin, Y. Li and J. Xiong, The Nirenberg problem and its generalizations: a unified approach,Math. Ann.369 (2017) 109–151

    2017

  19. [27]

    Jin and J

    T. Jin and J. Xiong, Asymptotic symmetry and local behavior of solutions of higher order conformally invariant equations with isolated singularities,Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire38(2021), no. 4, 1167–1216

    2021

  20. [28]

    Korevaar, R

    N. Korevaar, R. Mazzeo, F. Pacard and R. Schoen, Refined asymptotics for constant scalar curvature metrics with isolated singularities,Invent. Math.135(1999) 233–272

    1999

  21. [29]

    Le, On classical solutions to the Hartree equation,J

    P. Le, On classical solutions to the Hartree equation,J. Math. Anal. Appl.485(2020) 123859

    2020

  22. [30]

    Le, Symmetry and classification of solutions to an integral equation of the Choquard type,C

    P. Le, Symmetry and classification of solutions to an integral equation of the Choquard type,C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris357(2019) 878–888

    2019

  23. [31]

    Li, Local asymptotic symmetry of singular solutions to nonlinear elliptic equations,Invent

    C. Li, Local asymptotic symmetry of singular solutions to nonlinear elliptic equations,Invent. Math.123(1996) 221–231

    1996

  24. [32]

    Li, Remark on some conformally invariant integral equations: the method of moving spheres,J

    Y. Li, Remark on some conformally invariant integral equations: the method of moving spheres,J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS)6(2004) 153–180

    2004

  25. [33]

    Li and L

    Y. Li and L. Zhang, Liouville-type theorems and Harnack-type inequalities for semilinear elliptic equations,J. Anal. Math.90(2003) 27–87. LOCAL ASYMPTOTICS FOR CRITICAL HARTREE EQUATIONS 35

    2003

  26. [34]

    Li and M

    Y. Li and M. Zhu, Uniqueness theorems through the method of moving spheres,Duke Math. J.80(1995) 383–417

    1995

  27. [35]

    E. H. Lieb, Existence and uniqueness of the minimizing solution of Choquard’s nonlinear equation,Studies in Appl. Math.57(1976/77) 93–105

    1976

  28. [36]

    E. H. Lieb, Sharp constants in the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev and related inequalities,Ann. of Math. (2)118 (1983) 349–374

    1983

  29. [37]

    Lin, A classification of solutions of a conformally invariant fourth order equation inR n,Comment

    C.-S. Lin, A classification of solutions of a conformally invariant fourth order equation inR n,Comment. Math. Helv.73(1998) 206–231

    1998

  30. [38]

    Ma and L

    L. Ma and L. Zhao, Classification of positive solitary solutions of the nonlinear Choquard equation,Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.195(2010) 455–467

    2010

  31. [39]

    P. Ma, X. Shang and J. Zhang, Symmetry and nonexistence of positive solutions for fractional Choquard equations,Pacific J. Math.304(2020) 143–167

    2020

  32. [40]

    Forum Math.27(2015) 373–447

    Changxing, Miao, Yifei Wu, Guixiang Xu, Dynamics for the focusing, energy-critical nonlinear Hartree equation. Forum Math.27(2015) 373–447

    2015

  33. [41]

    Moroz and J

    V. Moroz and J. Van Schaftingen, A guide to the Choquard equation,J. Fixed Point Theory Appl.19(2017) 773–813

    2017

  34. [42]

    Pekar,Untersuchung¨uber die Elektronentheorie der Kristalle, Akademie Verlag, Berlin (1954)

    S. Pekar,Untersuchung¨uber die Elektronentheorie der Kristalle, Akademie Verlag, Berlin (1954)

    1954

  35. [43]

    Ratzkin, On constant Q-curvature metrics with isolated singularities,arXiv:2001.07984 [math.DG](2020)

    J. Ratzkin, On constant Q-curvature metrics with isolated singularities,arXiv:2001.07984 [math.DG](2020)

    2020 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Rodemich,The Sobolev inequality with best possible constant, Analysis Seminar Caltech, Spring (1966)

    E. Rodemich,The Sobolev inequality with best possible constant, Analysis Seminar Caltech, Spring (1966)

    1966

  37. [45]

    S. L. Sobolev,Applications of functional analysis in mathematical physics, Translations of Mathematical Monographs, Vol. 7, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (1963), translated from the Russian by F. E. Browder

    1963

  38. [46]

    Squassina, M

    M. Squassina, M. Yang and S. Zhao, Local uniqueness of blow-up solutions for critical Hartree equations in bounded domain,Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations62(2023) Paper No. 217, 51

    2023

  39. [47]

    Talenti, Best constant in Sobolev inequality,Ann

    G. Talenti, Best constant in Sobolev inequality,Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4)110(1976) 353–372. (J.H. Andrade)Institute of Mathematics and Statistics, University of S˜ao Paulo 05508-090, S˜ao Paulo-SP, Brazil Email address:andradejh@ime.usp.br (T. Feng)School of Mathematical Scienc...

    1976

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.