Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 33 references

Handle decompositions and stabilizations of open books

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes that exchange moves on an open book's handle decomposition change the page and monodromy in a controlled way while leaving the underlying manifold unchanged, recovering stabilizations and reducing trivial-monodromy…

desk verdict Genuinely new handle-exchange construction, but the main theorem is a sketch that needs to be filled in before the applications are fully load-bearing. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.19343 v1 pith:IF7K4AUJ submitted 2025-05-25 math.GT

Chun-Sheng Hsueh This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.GT MSC 57K4557M50
keywords handlecalculusopenbooksstabilizationmonodromyslidesboundaryconnectedsumtrivialexchangedpage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper produces handle decompositions that encode open book decompositions of $n$-manifolds for $n \geq 3$, and then shows that certain handle slides, called exchange moves, turn one open book into a different open book on the same underlying manifold. The main technical statement, Theorem 4.7, says that an exchangeable choice of handles on the page replaces those handles by complementary disk-bundle summands and produces a new page with a new monodromy, while the ambient manifold does not change. Because handle slides never change the manifold, this gives a uniform explanation of known stabilization operations for open books, and yields explicit new sphere open books with non-isotopic monodromies. As an application, every open book with trivial monodromy in dimension at least four can be stabilized so that its page is a boundary connected sum of trivial disk bundles over spheres.

What carries the argument

The central object is the exchange move, applied to the induced symmetric handle decomposition $h \cup_{\varphi} h^{*}$ of $\operatorname{Ob}(M, \varphi)$. A selection $A$ picks handles of index at least two whose monodromy restriction is isotopic to the identity; an exchangeable selection means no unselected handle is forced to intersect a selected handle's belt sphere. For each selected $k$-handle, the move slides the attaching sphere of its dual, an $(n-k)$-handle, into the $0$-handle and slides the selected handle itself into the $n$-handle, which replaces the handle by a boundary connected summand $S^{n-k} \times D^{k-1}$. The exchanged page $M^A$ is the page obtained by performing these replacements, and Theorem 4.7 gives the new monodromy $\varphi_A$ by patching the old monodromy on unselected handles with the new attaching data on the summands.

What would settle it

Take a page with one 1-handle and one 2-handle in canceling position, select the 2-handle, and carry out the exchange moves. The theorem predicts that the leftover handles form a handle decomposition of the half open book on the exchanged page, with the 2-handle replaced by $S^{n-2} \times D^1$; drawing the attaching spheres after the exchange and checking the handle count and attaching maps against Table 1 would settle whether Theorem 4.7 holds in the simplest nontrivial case.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that handle slides on the open book's handle decomposition are not merely moves that preserve the manifold: they are moves that change the page and monodromy in a controlled way. Given an open book $(M, \varphi)$ and a handle decomposition $h$ of $M$, choose a 'selection' $A$ of handles of index at least $2$ on which $\varphi$ is isotopic to the identity. The exchange move slides the dual of each selected handle into the $0$-handle and the selected handle into the $n$-handle; Theorem 4.7 asserts that the result is the handle decomposition of $\operatorname{Ob}(M^A, \varphi_A)$ induced by the exchanged page $M^A$, whose handle decomposition $h^A$ is obtained by replacing each selected $k$-handle with an $S^{n-k} \times D^{k-1}$ boundary summand. Hence $\operatorname{Ob}(M, \varphi)$ and $\operatorname{Ob}(M^A, \varphi_A)$ are diffeomorphic. From this, Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 recover $k$-stabilizations and middle-dimensional stabilizations, Theorem 1.3 gives explicit sphere open books with non-isotopic monodromies, and Theorem 1.4 reduces trivial-monodromy open books to boundary connected sums of disk bundles over spheres.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that, after the exchange moves, the remaining handles split into a handle decomposition of the half open book on the exchanged page and a relative handle decomposition on its boundary; the proof of Theorem 4.7 states this split rather than verifying it handle-by-handle, and the central claim collapses if this split fails for some page.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every open book in dimension $n \geq 3$ and every $k \in [2, n-1]$, there is a $k$-stabilization whose page is $M \natural (S^{k-1} \times D^{n-k}) \natural (S^{n-k} \times D^{k-1})$, with the new monodromy restricting to the old one, and the resulting open book is not equivalent to the original.
  • An odd-dimensional open book whose page has dimension $2\ell$ admits a middle-dimensional stabilization with page $M \natural (S^{\ell} \times D^{\ell})$, matching a standard contact stabilization.
  • For each $n \geq 3$ and $k \in [2, n-1]$, the sphere $S^n$ admits explicit open books with page $(S^{k-1} \times D^{n-k}) \natural (S^{n-k} \times D^{k-1})$; for $k \leq \lfloor n/2 \rfloor$ the monodromies $\tau_k$ and $\tau_{n-k+1}$ are non-isotopic relative to the boundary.
  • Any open book with trivial monodromy in dimension $n \geq 4$ can be stabilized to one whose page is $\natural_{i=1}^{n-2} \natural_{\mu_i} (S^i \times D^{n-1-i})$ for an explicit tuple $\mu$, with the original manifold unchanged.
  • Two trivial-monodromy open books whose pages have equal Euler characteristic, or equal Euler characteristic modulo $2$ when the pages are even-dimensional, can be stabilized to open books with a common page.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If Theorem 4.7 is correct, exchange moves give a purely smooth handle-calculus proof of stabilizations that contact geometry usually produces via Weinstein handles and Dehn–Seidel twists, which may help transfer Giroux-style stabilization questions to higher-dimensional smooth topology.
  • The exchange construction suggests a duality on handle decompositions: selecting handles and then selecting the complementary dual handles may exchange the page again, potentially generating a graph of pairwise diffeomorphic open books; the paper does not explore this iteration.
  • The trivial-monodromy theorem can be read as a normal form in which page complexity is traded for monodromy complexity, so explicitly computing $\sigma_\mu$ in low dimensions could yield new handle diagrams for high-dimensional open books.
  • A testable extension would be to drop the exchangeability assumption and allow monodromy that is nontrivial on selected handles, asking whether a generalized move with compensating twists yields analogous stabilizations; Theorem 1.2 hints that such moves may exist.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper develops a handle-calculus framework for open book decompositions in dimension at least three. It constructs a handle decomposition of the open book Ob(M, φ) from a handle decomposition h of the page M, defines a notion of 'exchangeable selection' of handles, and introduces 'exchange moves' consisting of handle slides that replace selected page handles by their dual handles. The main technical result (Theorem 4.7) asserts that these moves yield the induced handle decomposition of the open book whose page is the 'exchanged page' M^A and whose monodromy is a new map φ_A. Corollary 4.8 concludes that the underlying manifold is unchanged. From this the paper derives k-stabilizations and a middle-dimensional stabilization (Theorems 1.1 and 1.2), explicit open books on spheres with non-isotopic monodromies (Theorem 1.3), and a general stabilization result for trivial-monodromy open books to pages that are boundary connected sums of sphere times disks (Theorem 1.4 and Corollary 1.5).

Significance. The framework is potentially useful and original: it offers a uniform high-dimensional generalization of known stabilization operations and connects them to handle slides, recovering Quinn's almost-canonical pages and Harer's Hopf plumbing in special cases. The constructions are explicit and concrete, and the claimed applications are falsifiable and well stated. However, the central Theorem 4.7 is currently supported by a sketch argument, so the significance is conditional on a complete proof of the handle-by-handle identification of the two handle decompositions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4, proof of Theorem 4.7] The sentence 'Consequently, the union of the 0-handle, all µ1 1-handles, the handles h^ℓ_i with (i,ℓ)∉A, and the dual handles h^{k*}_j with (j,k)∈A coincides with a handle decomposition on the half open book with the exchanged page M^A' is asserted without verifying that the attaching spheres, handle indices, and handle counts match the induced decomposition h^A constructed in Definition 4.3, nor that the dual handles' attaching maps after the slides are those prescribed by Lemma 3.5 for the exchanged page. Because every subsequent statement (Corollary 4.8, Theorems 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4) relies on this identification, the proof needs a handle-by-handle verification or a precise reference to a lemma that establishes the split.
  2. [Section 4, Definition 4.6] The exchange move (2) slides the attaching sphere of a selected page handle h^k_j into the n-handle, which is not a standard same-index handle slide; the paper appeals to [GS99] for preservation of diffeomorphism type, but for the slide to be an allowable handle move one must express it as a sequence of slides in the dual decomposition or verify that the resulting attaching data is obtained by legitimate handle slides. Without this justification, the diffeomorphism-type statement of Corollary 4.8 is not established for the two moves in combination.
  3. [Section 5, proof of Theorem 1.3] The proof of non-isotopy omits Claim 2 ('Since the proofs of Claims 1 and 2 are similar, we omit the latter'). The page (S^{k-1}×D^{n-k}) ♮ (S^{n-k}×D^{k-1}) is not symmetric under the map k ↦ n−k+1 when k ≤ n/2, so Claim 2 is not a formal consequence of Claim 1 and the homology computation for τ_{n-k+1} must be supplied for the theorem's conclusion.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction] The phrase 'Hopf plumings' should be 'Hopf plumbings', and the spelling of 'stabilization' is inconsistent in a few places.
  2. [Definition 4.1] The selection condition depends on the chosen handle decomposition h; the paper should clarify whether M^A is intended to depend on h or to be independent up to diffeomorphism, and if the latter, provide a proof.
  3. [Figure 6] The schematic in Figure 6 would benefit from more detailed labeling of the handles before and after the exchange moves, so that the reader can follow which handle is slid along which path.
  4. [Definition 2.4] The convention for the orientation-reversing gluing map φ : ∂X → ∂X is terse; a sentence explaining the orientation convention in the double construction would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the exchange-move construction is independent of its conclusion, and the self-cited half-open-book lemma is external evidence, not a circular input.

full rationale

I find no circular step. The central object of Theorem 4.7, the monodromy φ_A, is constructed after the exchange moves from the original monodromy on unselected handles and the attaching data of selected handles; it is not an input to the construction. The exchanged page M^A is defined independently (Definition 4.3) by replacing selected handles with boundary connected sums, and the proof then checks that the slid decomposition coincides with the induced decomposition on Ob(M^A, φ_A). The only self-citation, Lemma 2.8 ([Hsu24, Proposition 3.6]), is a published lemma about half open books with a proof outline; it does not assume Theorem 4.7, Corollary 4.8, or the stabilizations, so it is real support rather than a circular citation. The skeptical concern is genuine but not circular: the proof of Theorem 4.7 asserts, without a handle-by-handle verification, that the handles left after exchange moves split into a handle decomposition of hob(M^A) and a relative decomposition on (hob(M^A), DM^A); and in Theorem 1.3 the proof of Claim 2 is explicitly omitted ("Since the proofs of Claims 1 and 2 are similar, we omit the latter"). Those are rigor/correctness gaps that may affect the strength of the applications, but neither is a case in which a derived statement is identical to an input by construction or in which a fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted constants and no new geometric entities. It relies on standard handle-calculus facts from Gompf-Stipsicz and on one lemma from the author's prior paper [Hsu24], which is a published independent source. The central construction is a new combinatorial operation on handle decompositions, not a re-parameterization of known results.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Every compact smooth manifold with boundary admits a handle decomposition with exactly one 0-handle and no top-dimensional handle [GS99, Propositions 4.2.7 and 4.2.13].
    Used to choose the page handle decomposition h ∈ H(μ1,...,μ_{n-2}) throughout Definitions 3.2 and 3.3 and in Theorem 1.4.
  • standard math Any handle decomposition has a dual relative handle decomposition obtained by reversing handle indices [GS99, Chapter 4].
    Step 2 of Definition 3.2 constructs the dual decomposition h* on the half open book; supports Proposition 2.5 and Lemma 3.5.
  • standard math Handle slides preserve the diffeomorphism type of the underlying manifold [GS99].
    Corollary 4.8 relies on this to conclude Ob(M,φ) and Ob(M^A,φ_A) are diffeomorphic.
  • standard math An attaching map of a handle in canceling position can be isotoped to the identity map, so attaching a canceling (k−1)- and k-handle pair to a 0-handle gives a boundary connected sum with a standard piece [GS99, Example 4.1.4(d)].
    Used in the proofs of Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 4.7 to identify the exchanged page as M ♮ (S^{k−1}×D^{n−k}) ♮ (S^{n−k}×D^{k−1}).
  • standard math A handle decomposition on a page M induces a natural handle decomposition on the half open book hob(M) [Hsu24, Proposition 3.6].
    Lemma 2.8 is the foundation for the induced handle decomposition of Definition 3.2; cited from the author's prior published work.
  • standard math Attaching ν1 1-handles to a single 0-handle produces a boundary connected sum of ν1 copies of S^1 × D^{n−2} [GS99, Example 4.1.4(b)].
    Used in the proof of Theorem 1.4 to rewrite the exchanged page in the standard form ♮_{i=1}^{n−2} ♮_{μ_i}(S^i × D^{n−1−i}).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Handle decompositions and stabilizations of open books." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IF7K4AUJ

@misc{pith2026250519343,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Handle decompositions and stabilizations of open books},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IF7K4AUJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.19343}
}
abstract

We build handle decompositions of n-manifolds that encode given open book decompositions and describe handle slides that reveal new open book decompositions on the same underlying manifold, for $n \geq 3$. This recovers known stabilization operations for open books. As an application, we show that any open book with trivial monodromy can be stabilized to an open book whose page is a boundary connected sum of trivial disk bundles over spheres.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.19343 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Constructing the half open book with page [0, 1] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. for an example [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Trivial monodromy case: a(h 1∗ ) and b(h 1 ) are isotopic to coc(h1 ) ∪ coc(h1 ) ⊂ ∂ hob(M) ∼= M × {0} ∪∂M M × { 1 2 }. =  ∂D(n−1)−k × [0, 1/2] ∪ D(n−1)−k × {0} ∪ D(n−1)−k × {1/2}  . ∼1 and ∼2 is isotopic to  D(n−1)−k × {0}  ∼1 and ∼2  ∪  D(n−1)−k × {1/2}  ∼1 and ∼2  = coc(hk j ) ∪ coc(hk j ) the union of the cocores of hk j in the front and back covers as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Isotoping the attaching sphere a(h k j ∗ ) of the dual of a selected handle h k j into the boundary of the 0-handle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A schematic of exchange moves. h h A h ∪φ h ∗ (h ∪φ h ∗ ) A = h A ∪φA h A∗ page exchange exchange moves [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The vertical arrows represent a handle decomposition of the page, inducing a handle decomposition of the open book. h k j ∗ is a copy of Dn−k×Dk , where ∂Dn−k×Dk is identified with Dk×∂Dn−k ⊂ h k j . Firstly, the exchange moves slides the attaching region of h k j ∗ to…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: We perform boundary connected sum along U, which lies in a neighborhood of ∂M where the monodromy is trivial. given by (S k × Dn−1−k ) A = S n−k × Dk−1 . The new monodromy map is given by idSk×Dn−1−k A = idSn−k×Dk−1 . Alternatively, Ob(S k × Dn−1−k , id) ∼= S k × Ob(Dn…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: 2-stabilization is Hopf plumbing twice. From the penultimate diagram to the final one: rotate the disk A by 2π. such that the result of the handle attachment is diffeomorphic to M ♮(S ℓ × Dℓ ) as in [GS99, Example 4.1.4.(b)]. Remark 5.2. The 2-stabilization given in Th…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Generators of H1D(S 1 × D1 ) are given by the double of {pt} × D1 (red) and S 1 × q (green) ⊂ S 1 × D1 , where q ∈ ∂D1 . (1) Hk−1(τk) is non-trivial, whereas Hn−k(τk) is trivial. (2) Hn−k(τn−k+1) is non-trivial, whereas Hk−1(τn−k+1) is trivial. Since the proofs of Cla…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION output.nonempty.mrnumber duplicate missing pop "" 'skip if duplicate empty 'pop " " swap * " " * write if FUNCTION fin.entry add.period write mrnumber output.nonempty.mrnumber newline INTEGERS nameptr namesleft numnames FUNCTION format.language language empty "" " (" language * ")" * if FUNCTION form...

  2. [2]

    Alexander, A lemma on systems of knotted curves, Proc

    J. Alexander, A lemma on systems of knotted curves, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 9 (1923), 93--95

    work page 1923

  3. [3]

    Budney and D

    R. Budney and D. Gabai, Knotted 3 -balls in S ^4 , 2021, arXiv:1912.09029 http://arxiv.org/abs/1912.09029

    arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    , On the automorphism groups of hyperbolic manifolds, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN (2025), no. 7, Paper No. rnaf083, 28

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Breen, K

    J. Breen, K. Honda, and Y. Huang, The G iroux correspondence in arbitrary dimensions , 2024, arXiv:2307.02317 http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.02317

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Baader and F

    S. Baader and F. Misev, On the stabilization height of fiber surfaces in S^3 , J. Knot Theory Ramifications 27 (2018), no. 3, 1840001, 8

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Bourgeois and O

    F. Bourgeois and O. van Koert, Contact homology of left-handed stabilizations and plumbing of open books, Commun. Contemp. Math. 12 (2010), no. 2, 223--263

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Colin, F

    V. Colin, F. Presas, and T. Vogel, Notes on open book decompositions for E ngel structures , Algebr. Geom. Topol. 18 (2018), no. 7, 4275--4303

    work page 2018

Show all 33 references
  1. [9]

    Etnyre and Y

    J. Etnyre and Y. Li, The arc complex and contact geometry: nondestabilizable planar open book decompositions of the tight contact 3-sphere, Int. Math. Res. Not. (2015), no. 5, 1401--1420

    2015

  2. [10]

    Etnyre, Lectures on open book decompositions and contact structures, Floer homology, gauge theory, and low-dimensional topology, Clay Math

    J. Etnyre, Lectures on open book decompositions and contact structures, Floer homology, gauge theory, and low-dimensional topology, Clay Math. Proc., vol. 5, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2006, pp. 103--141

    2006

  3. [11]

    Geiges, An introduction to contact topology, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol

    H. Geiges, An introduction to contact topology, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 109, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008

    2008

  4. [12]

    Giroux and N

    E. Giroux and N. Goodman, On the stable equivalence of open books in three-manifolds, Geom. Topol. 10 (2006), 97--114

    2006

  5. [13]

    Giroux, G\' e om\' e trie de contact: de la dimension trois vers les dimensions sup\' e rieures , Proceedings of the I nternational C ongress of M athematicians, V ol

    E. Giroux, G\' e om\' e trie de contact: de la dimension trois vers les dimensions sup\' e rieures , Proceedings of the I nternational C ongress of M athematicians, V ol. II , Higher Ed. Press, Beijing, 2002, pp. 405--414

    2002

  6. [14]

    Gompf and A

    R. Gompf and A. Stipsicz, 4 -manifolds and K irby calculus , Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 20, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999

    1999

  7. [15]

    Harer, How to construct all fibered knots and links, Topology 21 (1982), no

    J. Harer, How to construct all fibered knots and links, Topology 21 (1982), no. 3, 263--280

    1982

  8. [16]

    Hsueh, Kirby diagrams of 4-dimensional open books, Proc

    C.-S. Hsueh, Kirby diagrams of 4-dimensional open books, Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. (2) (2024), 1--29, to appear

    2024

  9. [17]

    Kastenholz, Simplicial volume of open books in dimension 4, 2025, arXiv:2504.10975 http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.10975

    T. Kastenholz, Simplicial volume of open books in dimension 4, 2025, arXiv:2504.10975 http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.10975

    2025 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Kegel and F

    M. Kegel and F. Schm\"aschke, Trisecting a 4-dimensional book into three chapters, Geom. Dedicata 218 (2024), no. 4, Paper No. 86

    2024

  11. [19]

    Lawson, Open book decompositions for odd dimensional manifolds, Topology 17 (1978), 189--192

    T. Lawson, Open book decompositions for odd dimensional manifolds, Topology 17 (1978), 189--192

    1978

  12. [20]

    Licata and V

    J. Licata and V. V\'ertesi, The G iroux correspondence in dimension 3 , 2024, arXiv:2408.01079 http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.01079

    2024

  13. [21]

    Neumann and L

    W. Neumann and L. Rudolph, Difference index of vectorfields and the enhanced M ilnor number , Topology 29 (1990), no. 1, 83--100

    1990

  14. [22]

    Ozbagci and P

    B. Ozbagci and P. Popescu-Pampu, Generalized plumbings and M urasugi sums , Arnold Math. J. 2 (2016), no. 1, 69--119

    2016

  15. [23]

    Ozbagci, On open books for nonorientable 3-manifolds, Period

    B. Ozbagci, On open books for nonorientable 3-manifolds, Period. Math. Hungar. 84 (2022), no. 1, 56--69

    2022

  16. [24]

    Quinn, Open book decompositions, and the bordism of automorphisms, Topology 18 (1979), no

    F. Quinn, Open book decompositions, and the bordism of automorphisms, Topology 18 (1979), no. 1, 55--73

    1979

  17. [25]

    Saeki, On simple fibered knots in S^5 and the existence of decomposable algebraic 3 -knots , Comment

    O. Saeki, On simple fibered knots in S^5 and the existence of decomposable algebraic 3 -knots , Comment. Math. Helv. 62 (1987), no. 4, 587--601

    1987

  18. [26]

    , Knotted homology 3 -spheres in S^5 , J. Math. Soc. Japan 40 (1988), no. 1, 65--75

    1988

  19. [27]

    , Open books on 5-dimensional manifolds, Hiroshima Math. J. 32 (2002), no. 2, 189--205

    2002

  20. [28]

    Saha, On open book embedding of contact manifolds in the standard contact sphere, Canad

    K. Saha, On open book embedding of contact manifolds in the standard contact sphere, Canad. Math. Bull. 63 (2020), no. 4, 755--770

    2020

  21. [29]

    Seidel, Lectures on four-dimensional D ehn twists , Symplectic 4-manifolds and algebraic surfaces, Lecture Notes in Math., vol

    P. Seidel, Lectures on four-dimensional D ehn twists , Symplectic 4-manifolds and algebraic surfaces, Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 1938, Springer, Berlin, 2008, pp. 231--267

    1938

  22. [30]

    Thurston and H

    W. Thurston and H. Winkelnkemper, On the existence of contact forms, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 52 (1975), 345--347

    1975

  23. [31]

    van Koert, Lecture notes on stabilization of contact open books, M\"unster J

    O. van Koert, Lecture notes on stabilization of contact open books, M\"unster J. Math. 10 (2017), no. 2, 425--455

    2017

  24. [32]

    Weinstein, Contact surgery and symplectic handlebodies, Hokkaido Math

    A. Weinstein, Contact surgery and symplectic handlebodies, Hokkaido Math. J. 20 (1991), no. 2, 241--251

    1991

  25. [33]

    Winkelnkemper, Manifolds as open books, Bull

    H. Winkelnkemper, Manifolds as open books, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 79 (1973), 45--51

    1973

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.