pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.19786 · v1 · submitted 2025-05-26 · 🧮 math.DS · math.FA

Numerical Periodic Normalization at Codim 1 Bifurcations of Limit Cycles in DDEs

M. M. Bosschaert , B. Lentjes , L. Spek , Yu. A. Kuznetsov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 13:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.DS math.FA
keywords delay differential equationslimit cyclescodimension one bifurcationsnormal formsperiodic normalizationsun-star calculusnumerical continuationcharacteristic operator
0
0 comments X

The pith

Explicit formulas for normal form coefficients at codim-1 bifurcations of limit cycles in DDEs are derived to classify sub- and supercritical cases.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives explicit computational formulas for the critical normal form coefficients of all codimension one bifurcations of limit cycles in delay differential equations. These formulas come from combining the periodic normalization method with the functional analytic perturbation framework for dual semigroups. The results make it possible to numerically distinguish nondegenerate bifurcations from subcritical and supercritical ones. A characteristic operator is introduced to support robust numerical boundary-value algorithms based on orthogonal collocation. Implementation and testing focus on discrete DDEs while the theory holds more generally.

Core claim

Explicit formulas for the critical normal form coefficients of codimension one bifurcations of limit cycles in DDEs are obtained by applying the periodic normalization method together with sun-star calculus on periodic center manifolds; these formulas classify the bifurcations as nondegenerate, subcritical or supercritical.

What carries the argument

Periodic normalization method combined with sun-star calculus for dual semigroups, together with the characteristic operator that reduces the problem to numerical boundary-value algorithms.

If this is right

  • The formulas enable automatic classification of bifurcation type in concrete DDE models without manual analytic reduction.
  • Boundary-value collocation algorithms become directly applicable once the characteristic operator is evaluated.
  • Software implementations can be extended from discrete to more general DDEs while preserving the same theoretical guarantees.
  • The same approach supplies the coefficients needed for numerical continuation through the bifurcation point.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The explicit coefficients could be inserted into existing continuation packages to automatically switch between subcritical and supercritical branches.
  • Similar operator constructions might apply to neutral or advanced DDEs once the center manifold theory is extended.
  • The numerical scheme offers a route to study how delay length affects the criticality of Hopf bifurcations in population models.

Load-bearing premise

Periodic center manifolds exist and can be used for the bifurcations under consideration.

What would settle it

Direct numerical computation of the normal form coefficients for a standard example such as the delayed logistic equation, followed by comparison against independently observed bifurcation diagrams, would confirm or refute the formulas.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.19786 by B. Lentjes, L. Spek, M. M. Bosschaert, Yu. A. Kuznetsov.

Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: and 5.20] for a visualization. The number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Bifurcation diagrams of (69) with unfolding parameters (a, c). Left, sub- and supercritical period-doubling (PD) branches are shown, with two identified generalized period-doubling points con￾nected by a limit point of cycles branch. Right, a close-up near the cusp bifurcation located on the LPC-branch. In this setting, a cycle that undergoes a period-doubling bifurcation can be detected and continued in t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Bifurcation diagrams of (70) with unfolding parameters (ζ, τ ). The left figure is obtained via periodic normalization in DDEs while right figure is obtained via a pseudospectral approximation. In this setting, an extensive numerical bifurcation analysis for the equilibria of this system was per￾formed in [2, Section 8.3]. Specifically, a Hopf-Hopf bifurcation of type VI was identified at τ ≈ 5.90 from whi… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent work in [53, 54] by the authors on periodic center manifolds and normal forms for bifurcations of limit cycles in delay differential equations (DDEs) motivates the derivation of explicit computational formulas for the critical normal form coefficients of all codimension one bifurcations of limit cycles. In this paper, we derive such formulas via an application of the periodic normalization method in combination with the functional analytic perturbation framework for dual semigroups (sun-star calculus). The explicit formulas allow us to distinguish between nondegenerate, sub- and supercritical bifurcations. To efficiently apply these formulas, we introduce the characteristic operator as this enables us to use robust numerical boundary-value algorithms based on orthogonal collocation. Although our theoretical results are proven in a more general setting, the software implementation and examples focus on discrete DDEs. The actual implementation is described in detail and its effectiveness is demonstrated on various models.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives explicit formulas for the critical normal form coefficients at all codimension-1 bifurcations of limit cycles in DDEs by composing the periodic normalization method with the sun-star calculus perturbation framework on periodic center manifolds. These formulas are realized numerically through a newly introduced characteristic operator that permits robust orthogonal collocation boundary-value algorithms; the implementation and validation focus on discrete DDEs and are illustrated on several example models.

Significance. If the explicit formulas and their numerical realization are correct, the work supplies a practical computational tool for classifying nondegenerate, subcritical and supercritical bifurcations of periodic orbits in infinite-dimensional delay systems, extending the authors' earlier theoretical results on periodic center manifolds to concrete, implementable expressions.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4 (numerical implementation) and the definition of the characteristic operator] The numerical claim that the characteristic operator together with orthogonal collocation yields reliable sign information for the cubic coefficient rests on the unproven assertion that discretization commutes with the manifold reduction up to higher-order terms. No a-priori error bound controlling the perturbation of this coefficient under mesh refinement (especially for large delays) is supplied, which directly affects the ability to distinguish bifurcation types.
  2. [§2 (theoretical framework) and the statement of the main formulas] The central derivation assumes that the periodic center manifolds whose existence is taken from the authors' prior works [53,54] reduce the infinite-dimensional problem in a manner compatible with the subsequent numerical projection; the manuscript does not verify or bound the commutation error between this reduction and the collocation discretization.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] A short paragraph recalling the precise statement of the periodic center manifold theorem from [53,54] would help readers who have not studied those references.
  2. [Implementation section] In the software description, the choice of collocation points and mesh adaptation strategy should be stated explicitly rather than left to the accompanying code repository.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the constructive major comments. We address each point below, indicating where revisions will be made to improve clarity and acknowledge limitations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4 (numerical implementation) and the definition of the characteristic operator] The numerical claim that the characteristic operator together with orthogonal collocation yields reliable sign information for the cubic coefficient rests on the unproven assertion that discretization commutes with the manifold reduction up to higher-order terms. No a-priori error bound controlling the perturbation of this coefficient under mesh refinement (especially for large delays) is supplied, which directly affects the ability to distinguish bifurcation types.

    Authors: We agree that the current manuscript does not supply a rigorous a priori error bound on how discretization perturbs the cubic normal form coefficient. The numerical method is presented as a practical tool whose reliability is illustrated through convergence in the examples. In the revised version we will add a dedicated paragraph in §4 that reports observed convergence rates of the coefficients under successive mesh refinement (including for larger delays) and explicitly states that a complete theoretical error estimate controlling the sign for bifurcation classification is not derived here and is left for future analysis. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§2 (theoretical framework) and the statement of the main formulas] The central derivation assumes that the periodic center manifolds whose existence is taken from the authors' prior works [53,54] reduce the infinite-dimensional problem in a manner compatible with the subsequent numerical projection; the manuscript does not verify or bound the commutation error between this reduction and the collocation discretization.

    Authors: The derivation in §2 relies on the periodic center manifold theorem proved in our earlier works [53,54]. We acknowledge that an explicit bound on the commutation error between this reduction and the orthogonal collocation discretization is absent. We will revise the opening of §2 to include a short remark on the functional-analytic compatibility of the two steps and will augment the numerical examples with additional tests that monitor the stability of the computed coefficients as both the delay and the collocation mesh are varied. These additions will clarify the scope of the present contribution without claiming a full error analysis. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Minor self-citation on center manifold existence; explicit formulas and numerical operator derived independently

full rationale

The paper's derivation applies periodic normalization combined with sun-star calculus to obtain explicit formulas for critical normal form coefficients at codim-1 bifurcations of limit cycles in DDEs. It references prior work [53,54] solely for the existence and applicability of periodic center manifolds as a standing assumption, which is a standard foundational step rather than a reduction of the new formulas to prior inputs by construction. The introduction of the characteristic operator to enable orthogonal collocation-based numerical boundary-value problems constitutes an independent technical contribution. No parameters are fitted to data and then relabeled as predictions, no ansatz is smuggled via self-citation, and the central explicit formulas do not collapse to the cited manifold result. The self-citation is therefore minor and non-load-bearing for the claimed explicit formulas and numerical method.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on prior theoretical results by the authors and the introduction of a new operator for numerics without independent evidence provided in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Periodic center manifolds and normal forms exist for bifurcations of limit cycles in DDEs as per recent work
    Motivates the derivation as stated in the abstract referencing [53,54]
invented entities (1)
  • Characteristic operator no independent evidence
    purpose: Enables robust numerical boundary-value algorithms based on orthogonal collocation for computing normal form coefficients
    Introduced in the paper to facilitate efficient numerical application of the formulas

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5700 in / 1230 out tokens · 77613 ms · 2026-05-19T13:59:02.179749+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 85 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A. Andò, D. Breda, D. Liessi, S. Maset, F. Scarabel, and R. Vermiglio , 15 Years or So of Pseudospectral Collocation Methods for Stability and Bifurcation of Delay Equations, Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 127–149,https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89014-8_7

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-89014-8_7 2022

  2. [2]

    M. M. Bosschaert, S. G. Janssens, and Yu. A. Kuznetsov , Switching to nonhyperbolic cycles from codimension two bifurcations of equilibria of delay differential equations, SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 19 (2020), pp. 252–303,https://doi.org/10.1137/19m1243993

    work page doi:10.1137/19m1243993 2020

  3. [3]

    M. M. Bosschaert and Yu. A. Kuznetsov , Bifurcation analysis of Bogdanov–Takens bifur- cations in delay differential equations, SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 23 (2024), pp. 553–591,https://doi.org/10.1137/22m1527532

    work page doi:10.1137/22m1527532 2024

  4. [4]

    M. M. Bosschaert and Yu. A. Kuznetsov , Interplay between normal forms and center man- ifold reduction for homoclinic predictors near Bogdanov–Takens bifurcation, SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 23 (2024), pp. 410–439,https://doi.org/10.1137/22m151354x

    work page doi:10.1137/22m151354x 2024

  5. [5]

    M. M. Bosschaert, B. Lentjes, L. Spek, and Yu. A. Kuznetsov , PeriodicNormalizationD- DEs. GitHub, 2024, https://github.com/mmbosschaert/PeriodicNormalizationDDEs.git

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Breda , Pseudospectral Methods for the Stability Analysis of Delay Equations

    D. Breda , Pseudospectral Methods for the Stability Analysis of Delay Equations. Part I: The Infinitesimal Generator Approach, Springer International Publishing, Sept. 2022, pp. 65–94, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-01129-0_3

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-01129-0_3 2022

  7. [7]

    Breda, Pseudospectral Methods for the Stability Analysis of Delay Equations

    D. Breda, Pseudospectral Methods for the Stability Analysis of Delay Equations. Part II: The Solution Operator Approach, Springer International Publishing, Sept. 2022, pp. 95–116,https: //doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-01129-0_4

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-01129-0_4 2022

  8. [8]

    Breda, O

    D. Breda, O. Diekmann, M. Gyllenberg, F. Scarabel, and R. Vermiglio , Pseudospec- tral discretization of nonlinear delay equations: New prospects for numerical bifurcation analysis, SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 15 (2016), pp. 1–23,https://doi.org/10.1137/ 15m1040931

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    Breda and D

    D. Breda and D. Liessi , Floquet theory and stability of periodic solutions of renewal equations, Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations, 33 (2020), pp. 677–714,https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10884-020-09826-7

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    Breda, D

    D. Breda, D. Liessi, and R. Vermiglio , Piecewise discretization of monodromy operators of delay equations on adapted meshes, Journal of Computational Dynamics, 9 (2022), p. 103, https://doi.org/10.3934/jcd.2022004

    work page doi:10.3934/jcd.2022004 2022

  11. [11]

    K. E. M. Church , Eigenvalues and delay differential equations: periodic coefficients, impulses and rigorous numerics, Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations, 33 (2020), pp. 2173–2252, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-020-09900-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s10884-020-09900-0 2020

  12. [12]

    K. E. M. Church and X. Liu ,Smooth centre manifolds for impulsive delay differential equations, Journal of Differential Equations, 265 (2018), pp. 1696–1759,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde. 2018.04.021

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jde 2018

  13. [13]

    K. E. M. Church and X. Liu , Computation of centre manifolds and some codimension-one bifurcations for impulsive delay differential equations, JournalofDifferentialEquations, 267(2019), pp. 3852–3921,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2019.04.022

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jde.2019.04.022 2019

  14. [14]

    K. E. M. Church and X. Liu , Bifurcation Theory of Impulsive Dynamical Systems, Springer International Publishing, 2021,https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64533-5. S7

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-64533-5 2021

  15. [15]

    Clément, O

    P. Clément, O. Diekmann, M. Gyllenberg, H. J. A. M. Heijmans, and H. R. Thieme , Perturbation theory for dual semigroups II. Time-dependent perturbations in the sun-reflexive case, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Section A Mathematics, 109 (1988), pp. 145–172, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0308210500026731

    work page doi:10.1017/s0308210500026731 1988

  16. [16]

    Clément, O

    P. Clément, O. Diekmann, M. Gyllenberg, H. J. A. M. Heijmans, and H. R. Thieme , Perturbation theory for dual semigroups I. The sun-reflexive case, Mathematische Annalen, 277 (1987), pp. 709–725,https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01457866

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01457866 1987

  17. [17]

    Clément, O

    P. Clément, O. Diekmann, M. Gyllenberg, H. J. A. M. Heijmans, and H. R. Thieme , Perturbation theory for dual semigroups III. Nonlinear Lipschitz continuous perturbations in the sun-reflexive case, in Proceedings of Volterra Integrodifferential Equations in Banach Spaces and Applications, 1989

    work page 1989

  18. [18]

    Clément, O

    P. Clément, O. Diekmann, M. Gyllenberg, H. J. A. M. Heijmans, and H. R. Thieme , Perturbation theory for dual semigroups IV. The interwining formula and the canonical pairing, Trends in Semigroup Theory and Applications, (1989)

    work page 1989

  19. [19]

    B. A. J. de Wolff , Characteristic matrix functions for delay differential equations with sym- metry, Dynamical Systems, 38 (2022), pp. 30–51,https://doi.org/10.1080/14689367.2022. 2132136

    work page doi:10.1080/14689367.2022 2022

  20. [20]

    B. A. J. de Wolff, F. Scarabel, S. M. Verduyn Lunel, and O. Diekmann , Pseudospec- tral approximation of hopf bifurcation for delay differential equations, SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 20 (2021), pp. 333–370,https://doi.org/10.1137/20m1347577

    work page doi:10.1137/20m1347577 2021

  21. [21]

    Numerical Periodic Normalization for Codim 2 Bifurcations of Limit Cycles

    F. Della Rossa, V. De Witte, W. Gov aerts, and Yu. A. Kuznetsov , Numerical periodic normalization for codim 2 bifurcations of limit cycles, 2011, https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV. 1111.4445

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv 2011

  22. [22]

    Dhooge, W

    A. Dhooge, W. Gov aerts, and Yu. A. Kuznetsov , MATCONT: A MATLAB package for numerical bifurcation analysis of ODEs., ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 29 (2003), pp. 141–164,https://doi.org/10.1145/779359.779362

    work page doi:10.1145/779359.779362 2003

  23. [23]

    Diekmann, P

    O. Diekmann, P. Getto, and M. Gyllenberg , Stability and bifurcation analysis of Volterra functional equations in the light of suns and stars, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 39 (2008), pp. 1023–1069,https://doi.org/10.1137/060659211

    work page doi:10.1137/060659211 2008

  24. [24]

    Diekmann and M

    O. Diekmann and M. Gyllenberg , Equations with infinite delay: Blending the abstract and the concrete, Journal of Differential Equations, 252 (2012), pp. 819–851,https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jde.2011.09.038

    work page 2012

  25. [25]

    Diekmann, M

    O. Diekmann, M. Gyllenberg, and H. R. Thieme , Perturbation theory for dual semigroups. V : Variation of constants formulas, in Semigroup theory and evolution equations: the Second International Conference, no. 135 in Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Marcel Dekker Incorporated, 1991, pp. 107–123. Godkänd; 1991; 20101006

    work page 1991

  26. [26]

    Diekmann, F

    O. Diekmann, F. Scarabel, and R. Vermiglio , Pseudospectral discretization of delay dif- ferential equations in sun-star formulation: Results and conjectures, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 13 (2020), pp. 2575–2602,https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdss.2020196

    work page doi:10.3934/dcdss.2020196 2020

  27. [27]

    Diekmann, S

    O. Diekmann, S. M. Verduyn Lunel, S. A. v an Gils, and H.-O. W alther , Delay Equa- tions, Springer New York, 1995,https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4206-2. S8

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4206-2 1995

  28. [28]

    Doedel, H

    E. Doedel, H. B. Keller, and J. P. Kernevez , Numerical analysis and control of bifurcation problems (ii): bifurcations in infinite dimensions, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 01 (1991), pp. 745–772,https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218127491000555

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218127491000555 1991

  29. [29]

    Engel and R

    K.-J. Engel and R. Nagel , One-Parameter Semigroups for Linear Evolution Equations, Springer-Verlag, 2000,https://doi.org/10.1007/b97696

    work page doi:10.1007/b97696 2000

  30. [30]

    Engelborghs and E

    K. Engelborghs and E. J. Doedel , Stability of piecewise polynomial collocation for computing periodic solutions of delay differential equations, Numerische Mathematik, 91 (2002), pp. 627–648, https://doi.org/10.1007/s002110100313

    work page doi:10.1007/s002110100313 2002

  31. [31]

    Engelborghs, T

    K. Engelborghs, T. Luzyanina, K. J. Hout, and D. Roose , Collocation methods for the computation of periodic solutions of delay differential equations, SIAM Journal on Scientific Com- puting, 22 (2001), pp. 1593–1609,https://doi.org/10.1137/s1064827599363381

    work page doi:10.1137/s1064827599363381 2001

  32. [32]

    Engelborghs, T

    K. Engelborghs, T. Luzyanina, and D. Roose , Numerical bifurcation analysis of delay dif- ferential equations using DDE-BifTool, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 28 (2002), pp. 1–21,https://doi.org/10.1145/513001.513002

    work page doi:10.1145/513001.513002 2002

  33. [33]

    Golubitsky and D

    M. Golubitsky and D. G. Schaeffer , Singularities and Groups in Bifurcation Theory, Springer New York, 1985,https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5034-0

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5034-0 1985

  34. [34]

    Gov aerts, Numerical Methods for Bifurcations of Dynamical Equilibria, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Jan

    W. Gov aerts, Numerical Methods for Bifurcations of Dynamical Equilibria, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Jan. 2000,https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898719543

    work page doi:10.1137/1.9780898719543 2000

  35. [35]

    Gov aerts, R

    W. Gov aerts, R. K. Ghaziani, Yu. A. Kuznetsov, and H. G. E. Meijer , Numerical meth- ods for two-parameter local bifurcation analysis of maps, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 29 (2007), pp. 2644–2667,https://doi.org/10.1137/060653858

    work page doi:10.1137/060653858 2007

  36. [36]

    Guckenheimer and P

    J. Guckenheimer and P. Holmes , Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields , Springer New York, 1983, https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-1-4612-1140-2

    work page 1983

  37. [37]

    J. K. Hale and S. M. Verduyn Lunel , Introduction to Functional Differential Equations, Springer New York, 1993,https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4342-7

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4342-7 1993

  38. [38]

    Hille and R

    E. Hille and R. Philips , Functional analysis and semi-groups, American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I, 1957

    work page 1957

  39. [39]

    Y. Hino, S. Murakami, and T. Naito , Functional Differential Equations with Infinite Delay, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1991,https://doi.org/10.1007/bfb0084432

    work page doi:10.1007/bfb0084432 1991

  40. [40]

    Iooss, Global characterization of the normal form for a vector field near a closed orbit, Jour- nal of Differential Equations, 76 (1988), pp

    G. Iooss, Global characterization of the normal form for a vector field near a closed orbit, Jour- nal of Differential Equations, 76 (1988), pp. 47–76,https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0396(88) 90063-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-0396(88 1988

  41. [41]

    Iooss and M

    G. Iooss and M. Adelmeyer , Topics in Bifurcation Theory and Applications, vol. 3 of Advanced Series in Nonlinear Dynamics, World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc., River Edge, NJ, second ed., 1998, https://doi.org/10.1142/3990

    work page doi:10.1142/3990 1998

  42. [42]

    S. G. Janssens , On a normalization technique for codimension two bifurcations of equilibria of delay differential equations, master’s thesis, Utrecht University, 2010,http://dspace.library. uu.nl/handle/1874/312252

    work page 2010

  43. [43]

    S. G. Janssens , A class of abstract delay differential equations in the light of suns and stars, 2019, https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1901.11526. S9

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.11526 2019

  44. [44]

    S. G. Janssens , A class of abstract delay differential equations in the light of suns and stars. ii, 2020, https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2003.13341

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.13341 2020

  45. [45]

    Just, On the eigenvalue spectrum for time-delayed Floquet problems, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 142 (2000), pp

    W. Just, On the eigenvalue spectrum for time-delayed Floquet problems, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 142 (2000), pp. 153–165,https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-2789(00)00051-8

    work page doi:10.1016/s0167-2789(00)00051-8 2000

  46. [46]

    M. A. Kaashoek and S. M. Verduyn Lunel , Characteristic matrices and spectral properties of evolutionary systems, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 334 (1992), pp. 479– 517, https://doi.org/10.1090/s0002-9947-1992-1155350-0

    work page doi:10.1090/s0002-9947-1992-1155350-0 1992

  47. [47]

    M. A. Kaashoek and S. M. Verduyn Lunel , Completeness Theorems and Character- istic Matrix Functions, Springer International Publishing, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-031-04508-0

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    H. B. Keller , Lectures on numerical methods in bifurcation problems, vol. 79, Published for the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay; by Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987

    work page 1987

  49. [49]

    Krauskopf and J

    B. Krauskopf and J. Sieber , Bifurcation Analysis of Systems With Delays: Methods and Their Use in Applications, Springer International Publishing, Sept. 2022, pp. 195–245,https: //doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-01129-0_7

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-01129-0_7 2022

  50. [50]

    Yu. A. Kuznetsov , Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory, Springer International Publishing, 4th ed., 2023,https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22007-4

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-22007-4 2023

  51. [51]

    Yu. A. Kuznetsov, W. Gov aerts, E. J. Doedel, and A. Dhooge , Numerical periodic normalization for codim 1 bifurcations of limit cycles, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 43 (2005), pp. 1407–1435,https://doi.org/10.1137/040611306

    work page doi:10.1137/040611306 2005

  52. [52]

    Yu. A. Kuznetsov, H. G. E. Meijer, W. Gov aerts, and B. Sautois , Switching to nonhy- perbolic cycles from codim 2 bifurcations of equilibria in ODEs, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 237 (2008), pp. 3061–3068,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2008.06.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physd.2008.06.006 2008

  53. [53]

    Lentjes, L

    B. Lentjes, L. Spek, M. M. Bosschaert, and Yu. A. Kuznetsov , Periodic center manifolds for DDEs in the light of suns and stars, Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations, (2023), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-023-10289-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s10884-023-10289-9 2023

  54. [54]

    Lentjes, L

    B. Lentjes, L. Spek, M. M. Bosschaert, and Yu. A. Kuznetsov , Periodic normal forms for bifurcations of limit cycles in DDEs, Journal of Differential Equations, 423 (2025), pp. 631–694, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2025.01.064

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jde.2025.01.064 2025

  55. [55]

    Lentjes, M

    B. Lentjes, M. Windmolders, and Yu. A. Kuznetsov , Periodic center manifolds for non- hyperbolic limit cycles in ODEs, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 33 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218127423501845

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218127423501845 2023

  56. [56]

    Liu and P

    Z. Liu and P. Magal , Functional differential equation with infinite delay in a space of exponen- tially bounded and uniformly continuous functions, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 25 (2020), pp. 2271–2292,https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2019227

    work page doi:10.3934/dcdsb.2019227 2020

  57. [57]

    Luzyanina and K

    T. Luzyanina and K. Engelborghs , Computing Floquet multipliers for functional differential equations, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 12 (2002), pp. 2977–2989,https: //doi.org/10.1142/s0218127402006291

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218127402006291 2002

  58. [58]

    De Witte, W

    V. De Witte, W. Gov aerts, Yu. A. Kuznetsov, and H. G. E. Meijer , Analysis of bifurca- tions of limit cycles with Lyapunov exponents and numerical normal forms, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 269 (2014), pp. 126–141,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2013.12.002. S10

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physd.2013.12.002 2014

  59. [59]

    De Witte, F

    V. De Witte, F. D. Rossa, W. Gov aerts, and Yu. A. Kuznetsov , Numerical periodic normalization for codim 2 bifurcations of limit cycles: computational formulas, numerical imple- mentation, and examples, SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 12 (2013), pp. 722–788, https://doi.org/10.1137/120874904

    work page doi:10.1137/120874904 2013

  60. [60]

    Narici and E

    L. Narici and E. Beckenstein , Topological Vector Spaces, Chapman and Hall/CRC, July 2010, https://doi.org/10.1201/9781584888673

    work page doi:10.1201/9781584888673 2010

  61. [61]

    J. Peng, L. W ang, Y. Zhao, and Y. Zhao , Bifurcation analysis in active control system with time delay feedback, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 219 (2013), pp. 10073–10081, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2013.04.014

    work page doi:10.1016/j.amc.2013.04.014 2013

  62. [62]

    Pyragas , Continuous control of chaos by self-controlling feedback, Physics Letters A, 170 (1992), pp

    K. Pyragas , Continuous control of chaos by self-controlling feedback, Physics Letters A, 170 (1992), pp. 421–428,https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(92)90745-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9601(92)90745-8 1992

  63. [63]

    Qesmi, A short survey on delay differential systems with periodic coefficients, Journal of Ap- plied Analysis & Computation, 8 (2018), pp

    R. Qesmi, A short survey on delay differential systems with periodic coefficients, Journal of Ap- plied Analysis & Computation, 8 (2018), pp. 296–330,https://doi.org/10.11948/2018.296

    work page doi:10.11948/2018.296 2018

  64. [64]

    Riesz , Démonstration nouvelle d 'un théorème concernant les opérations fonctionnelles linéaires, Annales scientifiques de l'École normale supérieure, 31 (1914),https://doi.org/10

    F. Riesz , Démonstration nouvelle d 'un théorème concernant les opérations fonctionnelles linéaires, Annales scientifiques de l'École normale supérieure, 31 (1914),https://doi.org/10. 24033/asens.669

    work page 1914

  65. [65]

    Roose and R

    D. Roose and R. Szalai , Continuation and bifurcation analysis of delay differential equations, in Understanding Complex Systems, Springer Netherlands, 2007, pp. 359–399,https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-1-4020-6356-5_12

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6356-5_12 2007

  66. [66]

    Röst, Neimark–Sacker bifurcation for periodic delay differential equations, Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, 60 (2005), pp

    G. Röst, Neimark–Sacker bifurcation for periodic delay differential equations, Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, 60 (2005), pp. 1025–1044,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na. 2004.08.043

    work page doi:10.1016/j.na 2005

  67. [67]

    Röst, Some applications of bifurcation formulae to the period map of delay differential equa- tions, in Dynamical Systems and Applications, GBS Publishers, 01 2005

    G. Röst, Some applications of bifurcation formulae to the period map of delay differential equa- tions, in Dynamical Systems and Applications, GBS Publishers, 01 2005

    work page 2005

  68. [68]

    Röst, Bifurcation of periodic delay differential equations at points of 1:4 resonance, Functional Differential Equations, 13 (2006), pp

    G. Röst, Bifurcation of periodic delay differential equations at points of 1:4 resonance, Functional Differential Equations, 13 (2006), pp. 585–602

    work page 2006

  69. [69]

    DDE-BIFTOOL Manual - Bifurcation analysis of delay differential equations

    J. Sieber, K. Engelborghs, T. Luzyanina, G. Samaey, and D. Roose , DDE-BifTool manual - bifurcation analysis of delay differential equations, June 2014, https://arxiv.org/ abs/1406.7144

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  70. [70]

    Sieber and R

    J. Sieber and R. Szalai , Characteristic matrices for linear periodic delay differential equations, SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 10 (2011), pp. 129–147,https://doi.org/10. 1137/100796455

    work page 2011

  71. [71]

    A. L. Skubachevskii and H.-O. W alther , On the Floquet multipliers of periodic solutions to non-linear functional differential equations, Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations, 18 (2006), pp. 257–355,https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-006-9006-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s10884-006-9006-5 2006

  72. [72]

    L. Spek, K. Dijkstra, S. A. v an Gils, and M. Polner , Dynamics of delayed neural field models in two-dimensional spatial domains, Journal of Differential Equations, 317 (2022), pp. 439– 473, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2022.02.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jde.2022.02.002 2022

  73. [73]

    Spek, Yu

    L. Spek, Yu. A. Kuznetsov, and S. A. v an Gils , Neural field models with transmission delays and diffusion, The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, 10 (2020),https://doi.org/10.1186/ s13408-020-00098-5. S11

    work page 2020

  74. [74]

    L. Spek, S. A. v an Gils, Yu. A. Kuznetsov, and M. Polner , Hopf bifurcations of two population neural fields on the sphere with diffusion and distributed delays, SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 23 (2024), pp. 1909–1945,https://doi.org/10.1137/23m1554011

    work page doi:10.1137/23m1554011 2024

  75. [75]

    Szalai , Knut: A numerical continuation software

    R. Szalai , Knut: A numerical continuation software. GitHub, 2013, https://github.com/ rs1909/knut.git

    work page 2013

  76. [76]

    Szalai and G

    R. Szalai and G. Stépán , Period doubling bifurcation and center manifold reduction in a time-periodic and time-delayed model of machining, Journal of Vibration and Control, 16 (2010), pp. 1169–1187,https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546309341133

    work page doi:10.1177/1077546309341133 2010

  77. [77]

    Szalai, G

    R. Szalai, G. Stépán, and S. J. Hogan , Continuation of bifurcations in periodic delay- differential equations using characteristic matrices, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 28 (2006), pp. 1301–1317,https://doi.org/10.1137/040618709

    work page doi:10.1137/040618709 2006

  78. [78]

    Szücs, M

    J. Szücs, M. Levi, and V. I. Arnold , Geometrical Methods in the Theory of Ordinary Differ- ential Equations, Springer London, Limited, 2012

    work page 2012

  79. [79]

    A. E. Taylor and D. C. Lay , Introduction to Functional Analysis, Krieger, 1986

    work page 1986

  80. [80]

    v an Neer ven, The Adjoint of a Semigroup of Linear Operators, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1992, https://doi.org/10.1007/bfb0085008

    J. v an Neer ven, The Adjoint of a Semigroup of Linear Operators, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1992, https://doi.org/10.1007/bfb0085008

    work page doi:10.1007/bfb0085008 1992

Showing first 80 references.