Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 108 references

The TYPHOON Stellar Population Synthesis Survey. II. Pushing Full Spectral Fitting to the Limit in the Nearby Grand Design Barred Spiral M83

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Full spectral fitting of integrated galaxy light recovers the metallicity of M83's young stars to within 0.12 dex of individual stellar probes.

desk verdict The external validation against individual stellar probes is the real result and it is solid; the central metal-poor arc is the soft spot and should be treated as suggestive until an independent template check or a direct stellar probe inside the dip is shown. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.21127 v1 pith:J2RETLAN submitted 2025-05-27 astro-ph.GA

Eva Sextl , Rolf-Peter Kudritzki , Fabio Bresolin , Kathryn Grasha , Hye-Jin Park , Qian-Hui Chen , Andrew J. Battisti , Mark Seibert
show 2 more authors
Barry F. Madore Jeffrey A. Rich
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords fullspectralfittingstellarpopulationsynthesisyoungmetallicityM83gradientinterstellardustreddeningbarredspiralgalaxy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that full spectral fitting of integrated galaxy light—matching a sum of stellar population templates to each observed spectrum—can recover the metallicity of a galaxy's young stars accurately enough to map chemistry across a disk. The evidence is a one-to-one comparison in the nearby barred spiral M83: where blue supergiant stars, young massive clusters, and super star clusters have been measured individually, the population synthesis values agree to a mean offset of 0.02 dex with 0.12 dex scatter. On that basis the paper reads its fitted metallicity maps as real measurements, finding a flat, supersolar radial gradient in the young population and a dip in the galaxy center that it attributes to infall of metal-poor gas or AGN-interrupted enrichment. If the method is right, it turns integrated-light surveys into a way to map chemical evolution across entire galaxies rather than only at sparse point-like probes.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a linear combination of single stellar population (SSP) spectra, each with an age and metallicity, attenuated by a dust law with variable total-to-selective extinction R_V and color excess E(B−V). The model spectrum is M_λ = D_λ(R_V, E(B−V)) Σ_i b_i f_{λ,i}(t_i, [Z]_i) + b_a f^a_λ, with nonnegative coefficients b_i found by bounded variable least squares. What carries the argument is the separation of the fitted population into young (t_i ≤ 0.1 Gyr) and old (t_i ≥ 1.6 Gyr) components, and the conversion of fitted luminosity weights b_i into mass-of-metals metallicities via [Z] = log(Σ_i b_i γ_i Z_i / Σ_i b_i γ_i / Z_⊙) rather than a luminosity-weighted mean of [Z]_i. The validation against individual stellar probes is what licenses reading [Z]_y as a true metallicity.

What would settle it

Measure the metallicity of individual young stars or clusters inside the central metal-poor dip (within about 0.04 R25, where no stellar probe currently exists) and compare with the fitted [Z]_y in the same spatial bins; a systematic offset larger than the 0.12 dex scatter measured elsewhere would indicate the dip is a template-fitting artifact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that full spectral fitting of the 4000–7070 Å integrated spectra of M83, using a grid of single stellar populations with ages down to 0.1 Myr, recovers the metallicity of the young (age < 100 Myr) stellar population with an accuracy of about 0.1 dex. The comparison with individual blue supergiants, young massive clusters, and super star clusters yields a mean offset of 0.02 dex and a scatter of 0.12 dex, with no trend with age or the young-light fraction. This validation supports the subsequent results: the young population is supersolar at [Z]_y ≈ 0.2 dex with a flat radial distribution (slope −0.01 ± 0.06 per R/R25), there is a confined central region of lower metallicity along the circumnuclear x2 orbits, and the same fits reveal a 260 pc dust cavity near the center and an anticorrelation between R_V and the abundance of the photodissociation-region molecules CCH, CN, and CS. The paper also shows that cutting the blue end of the fitted spectrum (starting at 4600–4800 Å) produces spurious metallicity gradients, and that luminosity-weighted averages of logarithmic metallicity are biased by bright young stars, whereas its mass-of-metals averaging gives the chemically meaningful value.

Load-bearing premise

The template grid of model stellar spectra is complete enough to represent any real mix of stars in M83; if the real stars produce spectral features that no template combination can reproduce, the fitted coefficients, and hence the derived dust, ages, and metallicities, will be biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Integrated light from 4000–7070 Å can replace sparse individual-star spectroscopy for mapping young-population metallicity in nearby star-forming galaxies, at least to roughly 0.1 dex precision.
  • The flat, supersolar metallicity of the young disk supports chemical evolution models with roughly constant ratios of mass loss and accretion to star formation.
  • The central metal-poor region, if real, indicates recent dilution of circumnuclear gas by metal-poor infall or AGN-interrupted chemical evolution.
  • Dust and molecular gas are spatially correlated, and regions with smaller dust grains (low R_V) are enriched in CCH, CN, and CS, linking grain size distributions to photodissociation-region chemistry.
  • Surveys that lack blue coverage starting near 4800 Å will systematically misestimate young-population metallicity and can produce artificial radial gradients.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: The success of the one-to-one validation implies the same fitting machinery could be applied to more distant galaxies where individual blue supergiants and clusters are unresolved, turning integrated-light surveys into a chemical mapping tool at distances where stellar probes are impossible.
  • Editorial inference: The paper's attribution of the central metal-poor region to infall or AGN interruption is not uniquely proven; a discriminating test would be to compare old and young population metallicities in the same central bins—a young-only dip favors AGN-interrupted enrichment, while a dip in both populations favors recent gas infall or a merger.
  • Editorial inference: The reported R_V anticorrelation with PDR molecules is correlational; a causal interpretation could be tested with photodissociation-region models that vary the grain size distribution and predict the observed column-density ratios of CCH, CN, and CS.
  • Editorial inference: The demonstration that blue wavelength cuts create artificial metallicity gradients implies that existing metallicity maps derived from red-only IFU surveys of star-forming galaxies may need re-analysis, and that future surveys should push further to the blue.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper applies the TYPHOON full-spectral-fitting population synthesis method to a central 5x5 square around the barred spiral M83. Using FSPS v3.2 SSPs built on the MILES library augmented with young massive star spectra, the authors fit each Voronoi-binned spectrum for dust attenuation (E(B-V), R_V), ages, star formation rates, and mass-weighted metallicities of young (<100 Myr) and old stellar populations. They report a flat young-metallicity radial gradient ([Z]_y = 0.20 ± 0.02 − 0.01 ± 0.06 R/R25), a confined central low-metallicity region along the x2 orbits, a 260 pc central dust cavity, a correlation between dust and CO, and an anticorrelation between R_V and molecular PDR tracers. The central validation claim is a one-to-one comparison of [Z]_y with metallicities of blue supergiant stars, young massive clusters, and super star clusters, giving a mean offset of 0.02 dex and a scatter of 0.12 dex. The paper also repeats the analysis with pPXF and with the C3K stellar library, and examines the effect of blue wavelength coverage.

Significance. If the validation holds, this is a significant methodological result: it is the first spatial one-to-one comparison of full-spectral-fitting metallicities with independent young stellar probes, and the reported agreement strongly supports the use of integrated light spectroscopy for young-population metallicities when blue coverage is available. The flat gradient and the central low-metallicity region speak directly to chemical evolution models and infall scenarios in barred galaxies. The paper deserves credit for testing the method with an alternative fitting algorithm (pPXF), an alternative stellar library (C3K), and a wavelength-coverage experiment (Section 7) that demonstrates a real risk in red-only fits. The re-derivation of the NGC 1365 result with mass-weighted rather than luminosity-weighted metallicities (Section 6) is also a useful correction. The main caveat is that the most novel physical conclusion, the central metal-poor arc, currently rests on internal and same-template checks rather than on independent stellar probes inside the dip, and the C3K test is reported only as global statistics.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.2/4.3, Figs. 15 and 16] The central low-metallicity arc is the paper's most novel physical claim, but it lacks external validation inside the dip. The one-to-one comparison in Fig. 16 does not report any BSG, YMC, or SSC lying inside the low-metallicity region shown in Fig. 15; the pPXF rerun in Section 5 uses the same MILES-augmented FSPS SSP grid, so a template mismatch in the hot-star component would enter both fits alike. The independent C3K library is discussed only through global probe statistics (Fig. 18), not through a central map. Since the interpretation (metal-poor infall or AGN-interrupted chemical evolution) depends on the reality of this structure, the authors should either show that the C3K fit reproduces the central dip in map form, or explicitly characterize the dip as tentative pending independent stellar metallicity measurements in that region.
  2. [Section 3.1, Fig. 6] The R_V-PDR anticorrelation rests on 12 ALMA pointings, with Pearson coefficients of -0.70 ± 0.21 (CCH), -0.62 ± 0.16 (CN), and -0.52 ± 0.23 (CS). With n = 12 and three molecular species tested without multiple-comparison control, these correlations are marginal; the abstract states the anticorrelation as a result, while the text calls it an 'indication.' The authors should report p-values or bootstrap confidence intervals under a null of no correlation, add Spearman rank coefficients, and either strengthen or soften the claim in the abstract and Section 8 accordingly.
  3. [Section 5, Fig. 18] The C3K comparison shows a template-dependent zero point: with BVLS the mean offset moves from 0.02 to 0.10 dex and the scatter from 0.12 to 0.16 dex. This is a systematic uncertainty of order 0.1 dex that should be folded into the quoted accuracy of [Z]_y and into the interpretation of the flat gradient and the central dip. The paper currently presents the 0.02 dex offset as the headline validation without quantifying how much of the central dip amplitude (roughly 0.2–0.3 dex in Fig. 15) could be template-induced. Please add a systematic-error budget and state explicitly whether the central dip survives the C3K analysis.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Section 8] The acronym 'pPFX' in the Summary should be 'pPXF', as used elsewhere in the paper.
  2. [Title and front matter] There is an erroneous space in 'F ull Spectral Fitting' in the running title, and the typeset title has a space before the period in 'Survey . II'; these should be corrected.
  3. [Eq. (1), Section 2.2] The sentence 'Consequently, the sum over all b_i is also equal to unity' is terse; please spell out that both observed and template spectra are normalized to unity at 5500–5550 Å, so the fitted coefficients are normalized light fractions.
  4. [Section 4.1, Fig. 12] The quoted regression [Z]_y = 0.20 ± 0.02 − 0.01 ± 0.06 R/R25 does not state the radial range over which it was fitted; please state the range explicitly, especially since the central dip is excluded.
  5. [Section 3.1, Fig. 5] The statement 'No covariances between E(B-V) and RV were encountered' should specify whether this refers to the Monte Carlo error distributions of individual fits or to a spatial correlation in the maps, and how it was tested.
  6. [Section 4.3, Fig. 16] The 'weak indication of a small trend with Z_y' is not quantified; please provide the slope and significance, or state explicitly that it is driven by a single YMC point, as implied by the text.
  7. [Section 7, Fig. 21] The phrase 'age-divided mean stellar populations' is unclear; define it in terms of the b_y / b_o split used throughout the paper.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the central metallicity validation rests on independent stellar probes and the model comparisons are non-load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: observed TYPHOON spectra are fitted with FSPS/MILES-augmented SSP templates plus a dust attenuation law (Eq. 1), and the BVLS coefficients yield a mass-weighted young-population metallicity [Z]_y (Eqs. 3–7). The load-bearing validation in Section 4.3 compares [Z]_y with metallicities from BSGs, SSCs, and YMCs that are not constructed from the same fit; the quoted mean offset of 0.02 dex and scatter of 0.12 dex therefore test the fitting result against independent measurements rather than reproducing an input. The agreement with the Bresolin et al. (2016) chemical evolution model is a same-group citation, but the model is parameterized by azimuthally averaged stellar-to-gas mass ratios and is not fitted to the present [Z]_y values; moreover, the flat gradient is independently supported by H II region abundances. The pPXF re-analysis shares the SSP grid with BVLS, but the C3K run changes the stellar library, so the robustness tests are not reducible by construction. The central low-metallicity region lacks an individual stellar probe inside the dip, and the C3K check is reported only as global statistics; this is a validation-coverage caveat, not a circular-definition step. No equation in the paper defines the target result as an input or fits a parameter that is then renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard population synthesis inputs: the adopted SSP grids and dust attenuation law are external model choices, and the age thresholds t_y_lim and t_o_lim define the young/old split by hand. No new physical entities are introduced. The most consequential assumptions are the fidelity of the template library and the use of the same-group chemical evolution model as a comparison benchmark.

free parameters (5)
  • t_y_lim = 0.1 Gyr
    Chosen age threshold separating the young stellar population; all young-population metallicities, ages and the flat-gradient result depend on this definition.
  • t_o_lim = 1.6 Gyr
    Chosen threshold for the old stellar population; the old-population metallicity and [Z]_y - [Z]_o comparison depend on it.
  • Voronoi binning S/N target = 60 at 5000 A
    Minimum signal-to-noise used for binning; sets the effective spatial resolution of all derived maps.
  • b_y minimum = 0.1
    Bins with young light fraction below 0.1 are excluded from age and metallicity maps; this selection affects coverage and the apparent flatness of the gradient.
  • b_o minimum = 0.2
    Bins with old light fraction below 0.2 are excluded from old-population results.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Calzetti et al. (2000) attenuation law with variable R_V describes the dust attenuation toward the integrated stellar population in every bin.
    Adopted in Eq. (1); underpins all reddening, extinction and R_V results including the R_V-PDR chemistry anticorrelation.
  • domain assumption FSPS v3.2 SSPs with MILES library augmented by young massive star spectra represent the stellar populations in M83 sufficiently accurately.
    Central to the fit; template mismatch shifts all recovered parameters. Tested only with C3K library, which increases scatter.
  • domain assumption Nebular continuum contribution can be inferred from H-alpha/H-beta emission and included in the fit.
    Described in Section 2.2; if inaccurate, young population light fractions could be biased.
  • domain assumption The 4000-7070 A window at R~800 is sufficient to break the age-metallicity degeneracy for young populations.
    Section 7 shows blue cutoffs introduce artificial gradients; the paper argues the full window suffices.
  • domain assumption The chemical evolution model of Bresolin et al. (2016) (after Kudritzki et al. 2015) is a valid comparison for the observed metallicity profile.
    Used as confirmation of the flat gradient; the model is authored by the same group and may be calibrated on M83 data, so it is not fully independent.
  • domain assumption Individual stellar probe metallicities (BSGs, YMCs, SSCs) share the same metallicity scale and trace the same young population as the fitted [Z]_y.
    Required for the one-to-one comparison in Section 4.3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The TYPHOON Stellar Population Synthesis Survey. II. Pushing Full Spectral Fitting to the Limit in the Nearby Grand Design Barred Spiral M83." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J2RETLAN

@misc{pith2026250521127,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The TYPHOON Stellar Population Synthesis Survey. II. Pushing Full Spectral Fitting to the Limit in the Nearby Grand Design Barred Spiral M83},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J2RETLAN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.21127}
}
abstract

We apply population synthesis techniques to analyze TYPHOON long slit spectra of the starburst barred spiral galaxy M83. The analysis covers a central square of 5 arcmin side length. We determine the spatial distribution of dust through the analysis of reddening and extinction, together with star formation rates, ages, and metallicities of young and old stellar populations. For the first time, a spatial one-to-one comparison of metallicities derived from full-spectral fitting techniques with those obtained from individual young stellar probes has been carried out. The comparison with blue supergiant stars, young massive star clusters, and super star clusters shows a high degree of concordance when wavelength coverage in the $B$-band is available. The metallicity of the young population is supersolar and does not show a radial metallicity gradient along the investigated part of the disk, in agreement with our chemical evolution model. However, a notable decrease in metallicity is observed in a tightly confined region at the galaxy center, coinciding with circumnuclear orbits. We attribute this to matter infall either from the circumgalactic medium or a dwarf galaxy interloper or, alternatively, to AGN-interrupted chemical evolution. We confirm the presence of a dust cavity with a diameter of 260~pc close to the galaxy center. Dust absorption and molecular CO emission are spatially well correlated. We find an anticorrelation between R$_V$, the ratio of dust attenuation to reddening, and the emission strength of molecular species present in photo-dissociation regions. We confirm our results by using alternative fitting algorithms and stellar libraries.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.21127 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. V -band image (top) and Hα line flux (bottom) of the inner disk of M83 created from the TYPHOON data cube. Top: The two dashed ellipses indicate galactocentric distances of 2.25 and 4.51 kpc, corresponding to isophotal radii of 0.25 and 0.50 R25, respectively. Bottom: Two spiral arms using Hα are fitted with a logarithmic spiral (light￾blue). In addition, similar fits of ALMA - CO(2-1) observa￾tions are over-plotted… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. E(B-V) reddening map of M83 obtained from our TYPHOON population synthesis fit. The galaxy center defined by the peak of visible continuum surface brightness is at RA(J2000) = 13h 37m 00. s 95 and DEC(J2000) = −29o 51’ 55. ′′50 (D´ıaz et al. 2006) and indi￾cated by a black cross. The spiral arms of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Isocontours showing the correlation between E(B￾V) and CO(2-1) intensity in the central region of M83 shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (17 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Enlarged reddening map of the central region of M83. The positions of six COS (HST) pointings of the YMCs studied by Hernandez et al. (2021) are indicated as cyan symbols. Circles correspond to clusters with very low H i column densities and diamonds refer to somewhat …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Radial distribution of E(B-V) (top), RV (middle) and AV (bottom). through the condition ti ≥ t o lim. This allows us to calcu￾late the fit contributions bo, metallicities [Z]o, and ages log(to) as in Eq. (9) to (12), but with sums over SSP that satisfy the age criterio…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Spatial maps of the fit contribution coefficients by for the young stellar population. The plot indicates which fraction of the measured flux at 5500 ˚A comes from stars younger than 0.1 Gyr. The location of the CO spiral arm fit is shown in dark blue. regions where we…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Spatial map of the star formation rate of the young stellar population ψ 20 y over the last 20 Myr. with an increased emission from atomic and ionized H, cold molecular CO gas and cold and warm dust (see, for instance, Frick et al. 2016). For the northern spiral arm, w…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Top: Central map of most recent star formation ψ 5 y encountered over the last 5 Myr as obtained from our population synthesis analysis. Bottom: Central map of the star formation rate derived from Hα emission. The position of the dust cavity (in aqua) and the gas flow …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Central map of the average age (in years) of the young stellar population. x1 & x2 orbits (light blue) and the dust cavity (pink) are again overlaid. imaging ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Top: Map of the average stellar population age. CO spiral arm fits are over-plotted for orientation. Bottom: Lookback time when 85 percent of the mass of the total stellar population has formed as a function of galactocentric radius in kiloparsec. A linear regression …
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The radial gradients of the young population metallicities (in dark blue hexagons) from full-spectral fitting compared with results from individual H ii regions. The H ii region strong-line abundances (in light blue) were determined from the same TYPHOON data cube (Gr…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The radial gradient of the metallicity difference between the young and old stellar populations. This time, the error bars are explicitly shown. 3.2. The Spectral Contribution of the Young and Old Population In our population synthesis fit we explicitly separate betwe…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Metallicities of the young stellar population. CO spiral arms are indicated as before. Regions with by < 0.1 were removed in order to exclude results with larger uncer￾tainties (see text). 3.4. Stellar ages: the young population in the center [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Enlarged map of [Z]y around the center of the galaxy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Difference ∆[Z] = [Z]y - [Z]probe between popu￾lation synthesis and individual stellar source metallicities as a function of the mean flux-weighted age (top), [Zy] (middle) and by (bottom). Color coding: dark blue circles: BSG, red triangles: SSC, dark green squares: …
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Population synthesis with pPXF. Top left: Radial gradient of [Z]pPXF y , the chemical evolution model from Bresolin et al. (2016) is shown again in pink to guide the eye. Bottom left: Distribution function of the difference [Z]BV LS y − [Z]pPXF y , the orange line is …
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Difference ∆[Z]y − [Z]probe for different popu￾lation synthesis fit methods and isochrone SSP. Top: pPXF with MILES. Middle: pPXF with C3K. Bottom: BVLS with C3K. Color coding is identical to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Luminosity-weighted metallicity averages. Top left: Radial gradient of [Z]lw y , the chemical evolution model from Bresolin et al. (2016) is shown again in pink to guide the eye. Bottom left: Distribution function of the difference [Z]y − [Z]lw y . Right: Central map …
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Reanalysis of NGC 1365: central map of [Z]y . In our investigation in Paper I of the Great Barred Spiral NGC 1365 we have encountered a confined cen￾tral region where the metallicity of the young popula￾tion dropped dramatically and becomes lower than that of the old …
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Effect of wavelength coverage on the metallicity of the young stellar population (age < 100 Myr). The result from the baseline fit is drawn in each subplot in orange, the result with the wavelength cut in blue. The fitted wavelength is written over the fit each time a…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P., van Hoof, P

    Abel, N. P., van Hoof, P. A. M., Shaw, G., Ferland, G. J., & Elwert, T. 2008, ApJ, 686, 1125, doi: 10.1086/591505

    doi:10.1086/591505 2008

  2. [2]

    J., & Scott, P

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222

    arXiv 2009

  3. [3]

    A., et al

    Bittner, A., S´ anchez-Bl´ azquez, P., Gadotti, D. A., et al. 2020, A&A, 643, A65, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038450

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038450 2020

  4. [4]

    2020, ApJ, 896, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab919d

    Boecker, A., Alfaro-Cuello, M., Neumayer, N., Mart ´ ın-Navarro, I., & Leaman, R. 2020, ApJ, 896, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab919d

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab919d 2020

  5. [5]

    2009a, ApJ, 700, 309, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/309

    Bresolin, F., Gieren, W., Kudritzki, R.-P., et al. 2009a, ApJ, 700, 309, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/309

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/700/1/309

  6. [6]

    C., & Ryan-Weber, E

    Bresolin, F., Kennicutt, R. C., & Ryan-Weber, E. 2012, ApJ, 750, 122, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/750/2/122

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/750/2/122 2012

  7. [7]

    Bresolin, F., & Kennicutt, Jr., R. C. 2002, ApJ, 572, 838, doi: 10.1086/340371

    doi:10.1086/340371 2002

  8. [8]

    Bresolin, F., Kudritzki, R.-P., & Urbaneja, M. A. 2022, ApJ, 940, 32, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9584

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9584 2022

Show all 108 references
  1. [9]

    A., et al

    Bresolin, F., Kudritzki, R.-P., Urbaneja, M. A., et al. 2016, ApJ, 830, 64, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/830/2/64

    2016 doi

  2. [10]

    2009b, ApJ, 695, 580, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/695/1/580

    Goddard, Q. 2009b, ApJ, 695, 580, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/695/1/580

    doi

  3. [11]

    M., & Stasi´ nska, G

    Bresolin, F., Schaerer, D., Gonz´ alez Delgado, R. M., & Stasi´ nska, G. 2005, A&A, 441, 981, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053369

    2005 doi

  4. [12]

    M., Stanway, E

    Byrne, C. M., Stanway, E. R., Eldridge, J. J., McSwiney, L., & Townsend, O. T. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 5329, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac807

    2022 doi

  5. [13]

    N., Kruijssen, J

    Callanan, D., Longmore, S. N., Kruijssen, J. M. D., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 4310, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1527

    2021 doi

  6. [14]

    2013, in Secular Evolution of Galaxies, ed

    Calzetti, D. 2013, in Secular Evolution of Galaxies, ed. J. Falc´ on-Barroso & J. H. Knapen, 419, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1208.2997

    2013 doi arXiv

  7. [15]

    C., et al

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682, doi: 10.1086/308692

    2000 doi

  8. [16]

    C., Engelbracht, C

    Calzetti, D., Kennicutt, R. C., Engelbracht, C. W., et al. 2007, ApJ, 666, 870, doi: 10.1086/520082

    2007 doi

  9. [17]

    2015, Astronomy and Computing, 9, 20, doi: 10.1016/j.ascom.2014.10.004 —

    Camps, P., & Baes, M. 2015, Astronomy and Computing, 9, 20, doi: 10.1016/j.ascom.2014.10.004 —. 2020, Astronomy and Computing, 31, 100381, doi: 10.1016/j.ascom.2020.100381

    2015

  10. [18]

    2023, MNRAS, 526, 3273, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2597

    Cappellari, M. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 3273, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2597

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    2003, MNRAS, 342, 345, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06541.x TYPHOON: M83 23

    Cappellari, M., & Copin, Y. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 345, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06541.x TYPHOON: M83 23

    2003

  12. [20]

    2004, PASP, 116, 138, doi: 10.1086/381875

    Cappellari, M., & Emsellem, E. 2004, PASP, 116, 138, doi: 10.1086/381875

    2004 doi

  13. [21]

    A., Clayton, G

    Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245, doi: 10.1086/167900

    1989 doi

  14. [22]

    Cardoso, L. S. M., Gomes, J. M., & Papaderos, P. 2017, A&A, 604, A99, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201630378

    2017 doi

  15. [23]

    2020, MNRAS, 493, 4094, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa397

    Carrillo, A., Jogee, S., Drory, N., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 4094, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa397

    2020 doi

  16. [24]

    Cezario, E., Coelho, P. R. T., Alves-Brito, A., Forbes, D. A., & Brodie, J. P. 2013, A&A, 549, A60, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220336

    2013 doi

  17. [25]

    J., et al

    Chen, Q.-H., Grasha, K., Battisti, A. J., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 4801, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3790

    2023 doi

  18. [26]

    J., et al

    Chen, Q.-H., Grasha, K., Battisti, A. J., et al. 2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 534, 883, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2119

    2024 doi

  19. [27]

    Clark, C. J. R., Verstocken, S., Bianchi, S., et al. 2018, A&A, 609, A37, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731419

    2018 doi

  20. [28]

    Conroy, C., & Gunn, J. E. 2010, ApJ, 712, 833, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/833

    2010 doi

  21. [29]

    E., & White, M

    Conroy, C., Gunn, J. E., & White, M. 2009, ApJ, 699, 486, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/486

    2009 doi

  22. [30]

    P., Zaritsky, D., et al

    Conroy, C., Naidu, R. P., Zaritsky, D., et al. 2019, ApJ, 887, 237, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5710

    2019 doi

  23. [31]

    1989, A&A Rv, 1, 261, doi: 10.1007/BF00873080

    Contopoulos, G., & Grosbol, P. 1989, A&A Rv, 1, 261, doi: 10.1007/BF00873080

    1989 doi

  24. [32]

    M., Skrutskie, M

    Cutri, R. M., Skrutskie, M. F., van Dyk, S., et al. 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog: 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources (Cutri+ 2003), VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/246. Originally published in: University of Massachusetts and Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, (I...

    2003 doi

  25. [33]

    2017, ApJ, 847, 112, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa89ed de Vaucouleurs, G

    Davies, B., Kudritzki, R.-P., Lardo, C., et al. 2017, ApJ, 847, 112, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa89ed de Vaucouleurs, G. 1991, Science, 254, 1667 Della Bruna, L., Adamo, A., Amram, P., et al. 2022, A&A, 660, A77, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142315 D ´ ıaz, R. J., Dottori, H., Aguer...

    2017 doi

  26. [34]

    A., Kewley, L

    Dopita, M. A., Kewley, L. J., Sutherland, R. S., & Nicholls, D. C. 2016, Ap&SS, 361, 61, doi: 10.1007/s10509-016-2657-8

    2016 doi

  27. [35]

    A., Blair, W

    Dopita, M. A., Blair, W. P., Long, K. S., et al. 2010, ApJ, 710, 964, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/710/2/964

    2010 doi

  28. [36]

    Draine, B. T. 1978, ApJS, 36, 595, doi: 10.1086/190513

    1978 doi

  29. [37]

    2005, in American Institute of Physics Conference

    Dwek, E. 2005, in American Institute of Physics Conference

    2005

  30. [38]

    761, The Spectral Energy Distributions of Gas-Rich Galaxies: Confronting Models with Data, ed

    Series, Vol. 761, The Spectral Energy Distributions of Gas-Rich Galaxies: Confronting Models with Data, ed. C. C. Popescu & R. J. Tuffs (AIP), 103–122, doi: 10.1063/1.1913921

    doi

  31. [39]

    2022, A&A, 659, A191, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141727

    Emsellem, E., Schinnerer, E., Santoro, F., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, A191, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141727

    2022 doi

  32. [40]

    L., & Massa, D

    Fitzpatrick, E. L., & Massa, D. 2007, ApJ, 663, 320, doi: 10.1086/518158

    2007 doi

  33. [41]

    C., Babb, J

    Forrey, R. C., Babb, J. F., Stancil, P. C., & McLaughlin, B. M. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 4727, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1739

    2018 doi

  34. [42]

    M., et al

    Franchetto, A., Mingozzi, M., Poggianti, B. M., et al. 2021, ApJ, 923, 28, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2510

    2021 doi

  35. [43]

    2016, A&A, 585, A21, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526796

    Frick, P., Stepanov, R., Beck, R., et al. 2016, A&A, 585, A21, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526796

    2016 doi

  36. [44]

    A., S´ anchez-Bl´ azquez, P., Falc´ on-Barroso, J., et al

    Gadotti, D. A., S´ anchez-Bl´ azquez, P., Falc´ on-Barroso, J., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 482, 506, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2666

    2019 doi

  37. [45]

    1991, A&A, 243, 309

    Vauglin, I. 1991, A&A, 243, 309

    1991

  38. [46]

    Z., Kudritzki, R., Evans, C., et al

    Gazak, J. Z., Kudritzki, R., Evans, C., et al. 2015, ApJ, 805, 182, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/805/2/182

    2015 doi

  39. [48]

    2023, in Resolving the Rise and Fall of Star Formation in Galaxies, ed

    Grasha, K. 2023, in Resolving the Rise and Fall of Star Formation in Galaxies, ed. T. Wong & W.-T. Kim, Vol. 373, 234–241, doi: 10.1017/S174392132200429X

    2023 doi

  40. [49]

    H., Battisti, A

    Grasha, K., Chen, Q. H., Battisti, A. J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 929, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5ab2

    2022 doi

  41. [50]

    2023, MNRAS, 520, 4902, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad114

    Groves, B., Kreckel, K., Santoro, F., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 4902, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad114

    2023 doi

  42. [51]

    2019, ApJ, 884, 100, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab41ff

    Harada, N., Sakamoto, K., Mart ´ ın, S., et al. 2019, ApJ, 884, 100, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab41ff

    2019 doi

  43. [52]

    J., & Smith, D

    Harris, J., Calzetti, D., Gallagher, John S., I., Conselice, C. J., & Smith, D. A. 2001, AJ, 122, 3046, doi: 10.1086/324230

    2001 doi

  44. [53]

    Herbst, E., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 427, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101654

    2009 doi

  45. [54]

    2018, MNRAS, 473, 826, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2397

    Hernandez, S., Larsen, S., Trager, S., Kaper, L., & Groot, P. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 826, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2397

    2018 doi

  46. [55]

    2019, ApJ, 872, 116, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab017a

    Hernandez, S., Larsen, S., Aloisi, A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 872, 116, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab017a

    2019 doi

  47. [56]

    L., et al

    Hernandez, S., Aloisi, A., James, B. L., et al. 2021, ApJ, 908, 226, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd6c4 24 Sextl et al

    2021 doi

  48. [57]

    J., et al

    Hernandez, S., Jones, L., Smith, L. J., et al. 2023, ApJ, 948, 124, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc837

    2023 doi

  49. [58]

    2008, ApJ, 683, 630, doi: 10.1086/589920

    Vinciguerra, M. 2008, ApJ, 683, 630, doi: 10.1086/589920

    2008 doi

  50. [59]

    2018, PASJ, 70, 73, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psy071

    Hirota, A., Egusa, F., Baba, J., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, 73, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psy071

    2018 doi

  51. [60]

    T., Kudritzki, R.-P., Kewley, L

    Ho, I. T., Kudritzki, R.-P., Kewley, L. J., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 2030, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv067

    2015 doi

  52. [61]

    T., Medling, A

    Ho, I. T., Medling, A. M., Groves, B., et al. 2016, Ap&SS, 361, 280, doi: 10.1007/s10509-016-2865-2

    2016 doi

  53. [62]

    T., Seibert, M., Meidt, S

    Ho, I. T., Seibert, M., Meidt, S. E., et al. 2017, ApJ, 846, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8460

    2017 doi

  54. [63]

    T., Meidt, S

    Ho, I. T., Meidt, S. E., Kudritzki, R.-P., et al. 2018, A&A, 618, A64, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833262

    2018 doi

  55. [65]

    H., Hernandez, S., Smith, L

    Jones, L. H., Hernandez, S., Smith, L. J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.09020, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.09020

    2024 doi arXiv

  56. [66]

    2021, MNRAS, 502, 1967, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab147

    Kang, X., Chang, R., Kudritzki, R.-P., Gong, X., & Zhang, F. 2021, MNRAS, 502, 1967, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab147

    2021 doi

  57. [67]

    2023, A&A, 679, A83, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347677

    Kang, X., Kudritzki, R.-P., & Zhang, F. 2023, A&A, 679, A83, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347677

    2023 doi

  58. [68]

    1998, ApJ, 498, 541, doi: 10.1086/305588

    Kennicutt, Robert C., J. 1998, ApJ, 498, 541, doi: 10.1086/305588

    1998 doi

  59. [69]

    J., Dopita, M

    Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., Heisler, C. A., & Trevena, J. 2001, ApJ, 556, 121, doi: 10.1086/321545

    2001 doi

  60. [70]

    H., Sharp, R

    Knapen, J. H., Sharp, R. G., Ryder, S. D., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 408, 797, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17180.x

    2010

  61. [71]

    2023, ApJ, 949, 108, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc65e

    Koda, J., Hirota, A., Egusa, F., et al. 2023, ApJ, 949, 108, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc65e

    2023 doi

  62. [72]

    2008, MNRAS, 385, 1998, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12908.x

    Soubiran, C. 2008, MNRAS, 385, 1998, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12908.x

    2008

  63. [73]

    T., Blanc, G

    Kreckel, K., Ho, I. T., Blanc, G. A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 887, 80, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5115

    2019 doi

  64. [74]

    P., Castro, N., Urbaneja, M

    Kudritzki, R. P., Castro, N., Urbaneja, M. A., et al. 2016, ApJ, 829, 70, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/829/2/70

    2016 doi

  65. [75]

    T., Schruba, A., et al

    Kudritzki, R.-P., Ho, I. T., Schruba, A., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 342, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv522

    2015 doi

  66. [76]

    A., Bresolin, F., et al

    Kudritzki, R.-P., Urbaneja, M. A., Bresolin, F., et al. 2024, ApJ, 977, 217, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9279 —. 2008, ApJ, 681, 269, doi: 10.1086/588647

    2024 doi

  67. [77]

    A., Gazak, Z., et al

    Kudritzki, R.-P., Urbaneja, M. A., Gazak, Z., et al. 2012, ApJ, 747, 15, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/747/1/15

    2012 doi

  68. [78]

    P., et al

    Lardo, C., Davies, B., Kudritzki, R. P., et al. 2015, ApJ, 812, 160, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/812/2/160

    2015 doi

  69. [79]

    H., Pak, M., Jeong, H., & Oh, S

    Lee, J. H., Pak, M., Jeong, H., & Oh, S. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 4207, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad814

    2023 doi

  70. [80]

    K., Sandstrom, K

    Leroy, A. K., Sandstrom, K. M., Lang, D., et al. 2019, ApJS, 244, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab3925

    2019 doi

  71. [81]

    2022, ApJ, 932, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac69cc

    Liu, C., Kudritzki, R.-P., Zhao, G., et al. 2022, ApJ, 932, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac69cc

    2022 doi

  72. [82]

    S., Narayan, G., & Kirshner, R

    Mandel, K. S., Narayan, G., & Kirshner, R. P. 2011, ApJ, 731, 120, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/731/2/120 Mart ´ ın, S., Requena-Torres, M. A., Mart ´ ın-Pintado, J., &

    2011 doi

  73. [83]

    2008, ApJ, 678, 245, doi: 10.1086/533409 Mart ´ ın, S., Kohno, K., Izumi, T., et al

    Mauersberger, R. 2008, ApJ, 678, 245, doi: 10.1086/533409 Mart ´ ın, S., Kohno, K., Izumi, T., et al. 2015, A&A, 573, A116, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425105 Moll´ a, M., D ´ ıaz,´A. I., Ascasibar, Y., & Gibson, B. K. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 305, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx419 Moll´ a, M....

    2008 doi

  74. [84]

    2021, MNRAS, 502, 5508, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab449

    Parikh, T., Thomas, D., Maraston, C., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 502, 5508, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab449

    2021 doi

  75. [85]

    2023, A&A, 673, A147, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245673

    Pessa, I., Schinnerer, E., Sanchez-Blazquez, P., et al. 2023, A&A, 673, A147, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245673

    2023 doi

  76. [86]

    D., Ilha, G

    Riffel, R., Mallmann, N. D., Ilha, G. S., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 4064, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3907

    2021 doi

  77. [87]

    L., Raimundo, S

    Robbins, S. L., Raimundo, S. I., & Malkan, M. A. 2025, ApJ, 980, 64, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ada294 R¨ ollig, M., Szczerba, R., Ossenkopf, V., & Gl¨ uck, C. 2013, A&A, 549, A85, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118190

    2025 doi

  78. [88]

    H., et al

    Rosado-Belza, D., Falc´ on-Barroso, J., Knapen, J. H., et al. 2020, A&A, 644, A116, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039530 S´ anchez, S. F., Rosales-Ortega, F. F., Iglesias-P´ aramo, J., et al. 2014, A&A, 563, A49, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322343 S´ anchez-Bl´ azquez, P., Peletier,...

    2020

  79. [89]

    F., & Finkbeiner, D

    Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103

    2011 doi

  80. [90]

    K., Cacho, R., Ruiz-Lara, T., et al

    Seidel, M. K., Cacho, R., Ruiz-Lara, T., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 2837, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2295

    2015 doi

  81. [91]

    2021, ApJ, 914, 94, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abfafa TYPHOON: M83 25

    Weiss, A. 2021, ApJ, 914, 94, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abfafa TYPHOON: M83 25

    2021 doi

  82. [92]

    J., & Ho, I

    Sextl, E., Kudritzki, R.-P., Zahid, H. J., & Ho, I. T. 2023, ApJ, 949, 60, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc579

    2023 doi

  83. [93]

    2024, ApJ, 960, 83, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad08b3

    Sextl, E., Kudritzki, R.-P., Burkert, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 960, 83, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad08b3

    2024 doi

  84. [94]

    T., Davies, R

    Shimizu, T. T., Davies, R. I., Lutz, D., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 5860, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2802 Sipil¨ a, O., Zhao, B., & Caselli, P. 2020, A&A, 640, A94, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038353

    2019 doi

  85. [95]

    2019, A&A, 628, A38, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834665

    Spitoni, E., Cescutti, G., Minchev, I., et al. 2019, A&A, 628, A38, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834665

    2019 doi

  86. [96]

    1995, Computational Statistics, 10, 129141 Thain´ a-Batista, J., Cid Fernandes, R., Herpich, F

    Stark, P., & Parker, R. 1995, Computational Statistics, 10, 129141 Thain´ a-Batista, J., Cid Fernandes, R., Herpich, F. R., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 1874, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2698

    1995 doi

  87. [97]

    A., Braun, R., & Walterbos, R

    Thilker, D. A., Braun, R., & Walterbos, R. A. M. 2000, AJ, 120, 3070, doi: 10.1086/316852

    2000 doi

  88. [98]

    B., Rosas-Guevara, Y., Sillero, E., et al

    Tissera, P. B., Rosas-Guevara, Y., Sillero, E., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 1667, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3644

    2022 doi

  89. [99]

    B., Rizzi, L., Shaya, E

    Tully, R. B., Rizzi, L., Shaya, E. J., et al. 2009, AJ, 138, 323, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/138/2/323

    2009 doi

  90. [100]

    A., Kudritzki, R.-P., Gieren, W., et al

    Urbaneja, M. A., Kudritzki, R.-P., Gieren, W., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 102, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa79a8

    2017 doi

  91. [101]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 10, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3150

    Vallini, L., Witstok, J., Sommovigo, L., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 10, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3150

    2024 doi

  92. [102]

    2016, MNRAS, 463, 3409, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2231

    Vazdekis, A., Koleva, M., Ricciardelli, E., R¨ ock, B., & Falc´ on-Barroso, J. 2016, MNRAS, 463, 3409, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2231

    2016 doi

  93. [103]

    2016, A&A, 586, A13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527586

    Viaene, S., Baes, M., Bendo, G., et al. 2016, A&A, 586, A13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527586

    2016 doi

  94. [104]

    2017, Molecular Astrophysics, 9, 1, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molap.2017.11.001

    Wakelam, V., Bron, E., Cazaux, S., et al. 2017, Molecular Astrophysics, 9, 1, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molap.2017.11.001

    2017 doi

  95. [105]

    Walter, F., Brinks, E., de Blok, W. J. G., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 2563, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2563

    2008 doi

  96. [106]

    C., & Draine, B

    Weingartner, J. C., & Draine, B. T. 2001, ApJS, 134, 263, doi: 10.1086/320852

    2001 doi

  97. [107]

    2011, MNRAS, 414, 3719, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18675.x

    Westmoquette, M., Smith, L., & Iii, J. 2011, MNRAS, 414, 3719, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18675.x

    2011

  98. [108]

    M., Maraston, C., Thomas, D., et al

    Wilkinson, D. M., Maraston, C., Thomas, D., et al. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 449, 328, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv301

    2015 doi

  99. [109]

    G., Vallini, L., & Chevance, M

    Wolfire, M. G., Vallini, L., & Chevance, M. 2022, ARA&A, 60, 247, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-010254

    2022 doi

  100. [110]

    A., Alves, J., et al

    Zucker, C., Goodman, A. A., Alves, J., et al. 2022, Nature, 601, 334, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04286-5

    2022 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.