pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.22278 · v2 · submitted 2025-05-28 · 🧮 math.NA · cs.NA· physics.geo-ph

A Hyperbolic Moment Based Shallow Water Model for Coupled Bedload Suspended Load Morphodynamics with Variable Density

Afroja Parvin , Giovanni Samaey , Julian Koellermeier This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 13:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NA cs.NAphysics.geo-ph
keywords shallow water moment modelsediment morphodynamicshyperbolic regularizationerosion depositionvariable densityExner equationsuspended loadbedload transport
0
0 comments X

The pith

A derived hyperbolic shallow water moment model incorporates suspended sediment, bedload erosion and deposition, and variable density from the Navier-Stokes equations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper presents the HSWEMED model that extends shallow water moment methods to handle coupled bedload and suspended load morphodynamics. It derives the system from incompressible Navier-Stokes for water-sediment mixtures, adding a concentration equation and Exner equation with erosion-deposition terms. Variable density effects are coupled into the momentum and moment equations. Hyperbolicity is proven using regularization, and energy balances are shown for simplified cases. The approach improves accuracy in numerical tests for dam breaks compared to earlier models, offering a stable framework for simulating sediment transport in shallow flows.

Core claim

Starting from the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations for a water-sediment mixture, we derive a coupled system consisting of the shallow water equations, moment equations for polynomial velocity coefficients, a depth-averaged suspended-sediment equation, and an Exner equation for bedload transport with erosion-deposition coupling. Although the transported scalar is depth-averaged, we reconstruct a low-order vertical concentration profile consistent with the moment representation of velocity, providing the near-bed concentration needed in the closure. We prove hyperbolicity through hyperbolic regularization and derive dissipative energy balance relations for lower-order models.

What carries the argument

The hyperbolic regularization of the moment-based shallow water system coupled with erosion-deposition source terms closed by a reconstructed vertical concentration profile.

If this is right

  • The coupled system remains hyperbolic, allowing stable numerical solutions for morphodynamic problems.
  • Variable mixture density affects both momentum and higher-order moment equations consistently.
  • Dissipative energy relations hold for lower-order model truncations.
  • Path-conservative schemes can simulate wet/dry fronts accurately in dam-break scenarios.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar moment reconstructions could improve closures in other multi-phase shallow flow models.
  • The model framework may generalize to include additional transported scalars like temperature or pollutants.
  • Validation against more field data could confirm its use for river engineering applications.

Load-bearing premise

Reconstructing a low-order vertical concentration profile from the velocity moments accurately captures the near-bed sediment concentration needed to close the erosion and deposition terms.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of near-bed sediment concentration in a controlled dam-break flume experiment that deviates substantially from the low-order reconstruction used to close the source terms would falsify the coupling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.22278 by Afroja Parvin, Giovanni Samaey, Julian Koellermeier.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Sketch of sediment transport dynamics, illustrating bedload movement along the bed, suspended load [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The mapping from physical z−space to transformed ζ−space [37]. Using (14), for any function Φ(t, x, z), the corresponding mapped function in ζ−coordinates is given by Φ( ˜ t, x, ζ) = Φ(t, x, z)ζ + hb(t, x). (15) The corresponding differential operators read ∂ζΦ =˜ h∂zΦ and h∂sΦ = ∂s(hΦ) ˜ − ∂ζ (∂s(ζh + hb)Φ) ˜ , for s ∈ [t, x] . (16) Taking into account the mapping (14) and using the differential operators… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Quadratic vertical concentration profile [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Initial water height and sediment bottom [28]. h(0, x) = ( 1, if x ≤ 0, 0.05, otherwise. hb(0, x) = 0. (Academic dam-break) The properties of the sediment particles considered in this test are shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (left) presents the approximations of the free surface h + hb, and sediment bottom hb, at time t = 1 for the following models: the third-order HSWEMED, the classical SWEED, and the third-order HSWEM. -2 0 2 4 x -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 h b, h+h b HSWEMED SWEED HSWEM HSWEMED SWEED HSWEM free surface bottom -2 0 2 4 x -0.02 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 c m HSWEMED SWEED HSWEM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Initial water height and bottom (config a in [50]). h(0, x) = ( 0.35, if x ≤ 0, 0, otherwise. hb(0, x) = 0. (config 1) The computational domain Ω = [−3, 3] is divided into Nx = 1000 grid points. Within this framework, we apply a wet/dry treatment in the HSWEMED by considering a computational cell as dry when the water height h falls below a specified threshold, specifically when h < δ, with δ = 10−4 , to m… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: config 1: Free surface & bottom evolution at time t = 1 computed with the HSWEMED (solid), the SWEED (dashed), and the HSWEM (dotted). Results are compared with experimental data (dash-dotted) for the bed materials (left) PVC pellets and (right) uniform coarse sand. (bottom) Volumetric sediment concentration in the suspension at t = 1, computed with HSWEMED (solid) and the SWEED (dashed) for PVC and sand b… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Initial water height and bottom (config d in [50]). h(0, x) = ( 0.25, if x ≤ 0, 0, otherwise. hb(0, x) = ( 0.10, if x ≤ 0, 0, otherwise. (config 2) The primary difference in this configuration compared to the first is the presence of a discontinuous bottom hb. We consider Ω = [−3, 3] as the computational domain [50], discretized into Nx = 1000 equally spaced points. Similar to the first configuration, we c… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: config 2: Free surface & bottom evolution at time t = 1 computed with the HSWEMED (solid), the SWEED (dashed), and the HSWEM (dotted). Results are compared with experimental data (dash-dotted) for the bed materials (left) PVC pellets and (right) uniform coarse sand. (bottom) Volumetric sediment concentration in the suspension at t = 1, computed with the HSWEMED (solid) and the SWEED (dashed) for PVC and sa… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Initial water height and bottom (config f in [50]). h(0, x) = ( 0.25, if x ≤ 0, 0.10, otherwise. hb(0, x) = ( 0.10, if x ≤ 0, 0, otherwise. (config 3) 29 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: config 3: Free surface & bottom evolution at time t = 1 computed with the HSWEMED (solid), the SWEED (dashed), and the HSWEM (dotted). Results are compared with experimental data (dash-dotted) for the bed materials (left) PVC pellets and (right) uniform coarse sand. (bottom) Volumetric sediment concentration for PVC (solid) and sand (dashed) bed at time t = 1 computed with the HSWEMED and the SWEED. -1 0 … view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: For a sand bed with config 3, dam-break simulations at time t = 1 with increasing friction coefficient ϵ = 0.0324; (left) free surface, bottom evolution, and vertical profiles of velocity at x = −0.5, 0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, computed with the HSWEMED (black solid) and the SWEED (black dashed), (right) Froude number, computed with the HSWEMED (solid) and the SWEED (dashed). 31 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figur… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this paper, we develop the Hyperbolic Shallow Water Exner Moment model with Erosion and Deposition (HSWEMED), extending the shallow water moment framework to capture coupled morphodynamics with erosion and deposition. HSWEMED introduces a suspended-sediment concentration equation, couples concentration-dependent mixture density with the momentum and higher-order moment equations, and includes source terms due to erosion and deposition. Starting from the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations for a water-sediment mixture, we derive a coupled system consisting of the shallow water equations, moment equations for polynomial velocity coefficients, a depth-averaged suspended-sediment equation, and an Exner equation for bedload transport with erosion-deposition coupling. Although the transported scalar is depth-averaged, we reconstruct a low-order vertical concentration profile consistent with the moment representation of velocity, providing the near-bed concentration needed in the closure. We prove hyperbolicity through hyperbolic regularization and derive dissipative energy balance relations for lower-order models. Numerical results are obtained with a path-conservative finite-volume scheme based on a Lax-Friedrichs-type flux. Several dam-break tests, including wet/dry front cases, are validated against laboratory experiments, showing improved accuracy over existing shallow water moment models. The proposed HSWEMED provides a mathematically well-posed and computationally efficient framework for morphodynamic simulations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops the Hyperbolic Shallow Water Exner Moment model with Erosion and Deposition (HSWEMED) by starting from the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations for a variable-density water-sediment mixture. It derives a coupled system consisting of the shallow water equations, moment equations for polynomial velocity profiles, a depth-averaged suspended-sediment concentration equation, and an Exner equation for bedload transport that incorporates erosion-deposition source terms. A low-order vertical concentration profile is reconstructed from the depth-averaged scalar to close the near-bed concentration in the source terms. Hyperbolicity is proved via regularization, dissipative energy balances are derived for lower-order models, and a path-conservative finite-volume scheme is applied to dam-break test cases (including wet/dry fronts) that are compared to laboratory experiments, with claims of improved accuracy over prior shallow-water moment models.

Significance. If the derivations remain valid after incorporation of the concentration closure, the paper supplies a first-principles derivation from the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, a hyperbolicity proof, and an energy-dissipation identity together with direct validation against independent laboratory data. This yields a mathematically well-posed and computationally tractable framework for coupled suspended-load and bedload morphodynamics that extends existing moment-based shallow-water models while retaining variable density.

major comments (1)
  1. [derivation of dissipative energy balance relations for lower-order models] The dissipative energy balance relations derived for the lower-order models rely on exact cancellations that arise from the vertical integration procedure used to obtain the moment equations. However, the near-bed concentration that enters the erosion-deposition source terms is supplied by an assumed low-order vertical profile reconstruction rather than the same integration. It is not shown that the balance identity continues to hold once this reconstruction is substituted into the source terms; a direct verification (or counter-example) for the lowest-order case would be required to support the claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that numerical results show improved accuracy but supplies neither quantitative error norms, grid-convergence tables, nor any independent check on the reconstructed concentration profile.
  2. [model derivation] Notation for the polynomial coefficients in the velocity moments and for the reconstructed concentration profile should be introduced with explicit definitions before they appear in the source-term closures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. The observation concerning the dissipative energy balance relations is a valid point that requires clarification and explicit verification. We address it below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [derivation of dissipative energy balance relations for lower-order models] The dissipative energy balance relations derived for the lower-order models rely on exact cancellations that arise from the vertical integration procedure used to obtain the moment equations. However, the near-bed concentration that enters the erosion-deposition source terms is supplied by an assumed low-order vertical profile reconstruction rather than the same integration. It is not shown that the balance identity continues to hold once this reconstruction is substituted into the source terms; a direct verification (or counter-example) for the lowest-order case would be required to support the claim.

    Authors: We agree that the energy-dissipation identities were derived assuming all quantities, including concentration, arise from the same vertical integration procedure. The low-order reconstruction for near-bed concentration is chosen for consistency with the polynomial velocity representation, but we acknowledge that explicit substitution into the source terms has not been verified in the current manuscript. In the revised version we will add a direct algebraic check for the lowest-order (constant-velocity) case, confirming that the cancellations persist after inserting the reconstructed profile. If the identity holds only approximately, we will state the limitation clearly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation remains self-contained from NS equations with explicit closure assumption

full rationale

The paper starts from the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations for the water-sediment mixture and derives the shallow-water moment system, depth-averaged concentration equation, and Exner equation with erosion-deposition sources. The low-order vertical concentration profile is introduced as an explicit modeling choice to supply the near-bed value for the source-term closure; it is not obtained by re-deriving the moment equations themselves and does not redefine any target quantity in terms of itself. Hyperbolicity is established by regularization and dissipative energy balances are stated for the lower-order models. No fitted parameters are renamed as predictions, no uniqueness theorems are imported from the authors' prior work, and no self-citation chain is required to close the central derivation. External laboratory dam-break experiments supply independent validation, confirming that the claimed results are not tautological with the inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model rests on standard shallow-water and moment-method assumptions plus a specific closure for the near-bed concentration profile; no free parameters or new physical entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Shallow-water and hydrostatic pressure assumptions hold for the water-sediment mixture
    Invoked when depth-averaging the Navier-Stokes equations to obtain the base shallow-water system.
  • domain assumption Polynomial moment representation of velocity is sufficient to capture the relevant vertical structure
    Used to derive the higher-order moment equations and to reconstruct the near-bed concentration profile.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5780 in / 1530 out tokens · 35195 ms · 2026-05-19T13:27:04.396447+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Determination of bed shear stress in gravel-bed rivers using boundary-layer parameters

    H. Afzalimehr and C. Rennie. “Determination of bed shear stress in gravel-bed rivers using boundary-layer parameters” . In: Hydrological sciences journal 54.1 (2009), pp. 147–159. doi: 10.1623/hysj.54.1.147

    work page doi:10.1623/hysj.54.1.147 2009

  2. [2]

    Projective Integration for Hyperbolic Shallow Water Moment Equations

    A. Amrita and J. Koellermeier. “Projective Integration for Hyperbolic Shallow Water Moment Equations” . In: Axioms 11.5 (2022), p. 235. doi: 10.3390/axioms11050235

    work page doi:10.3390/axioms11050235 2022

  3. [3]

    A one-dimensional model for the transport of a sediment mixture in non- equilibrium conditions

    A. Armanini and G. Di Silvio. “A one-dimensional model for the transport of a sediment mixture in non- equilibrium conditions” . In: Journal of Hydraulic Research 26.3 (1988), pp. 275–292

    work page 1988

  4. [4]

    Asymptotic derivation and simulations of a non-local Exner model in large viscosity regime

    E. Audusse, L. Boittin, and M. Parisot. “Asymptotic derivation and simulations of a non-local Exner model in large viscosity regime” . In: ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis 55.4 (July 2021), pp. 1635–1668. doi: 10.1051/m2an/2021031

    work page doi:10.1051/m2an/2021031 2021

  5. [5]

    A Fast and Stable Well-Balanced Scheme with Hydrostatic Reconstruction for Shallow Water Flows

    E. Audusse, F. Bouchut, M.-O. Bristeau, R. Klein, and B. Perthame. “A Fast and Stable Well-Balanced Scheme with Hydrostatic Reconstruction for Shallow Water Flows” . In: SIAM Journal on Scientific Com- puting 25.6 (2004), pp. 2050–2065. doi: 10.1137/S1064827503431090

    work page doi:10.1137/s1064827503431090 2004

  6. [6]

    A multilayer Saint-Venant system with mass exchanges for shallow water flows. Derivation and numerical validation

    E. Audusse, M.-O. Bristeau, B. Perthame, and J. Sainte-Marie. “A multilayer Saint-Venant system with mass exchanges for shallow water flows. Derivation and numerical validation” . In: ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis 45.1 (2011), pp. 169–200. doi: 10.1051/m2an/2010036

    work page doi:10.1051/m2an/2010036 2011

  7. [7]

    Modeling, analysis and simulation of two geophysical flows. Sediment transport and variable density flows

    L. Boittin. “Modeling, analysis and simulation of two geophysical flows. Sediment transport and variable density flows” . Theses. Sorbonne Université, Apr. 2019

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Multilayer shallow water models with locally variable number of layers and semi-implicit time discretization

    L. Bonaventura, E. D. Fernández-Nieto, J. Garres-Díaz, and G. Narbona-Reina. “Multilayer shallow water models with locally variable number of layers and semi-implicit time discretization” . In: Journal of Compu- tational Physics 364 (2018), pp. 209–234. issn: 0021-9991. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.03.017

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.03.017 2018

  9. [9]

    Hydrodynamics of Turbid Underflows. I: Formulation and Numerical Analysis

    S. F. Bradford and N. D. Katopodes. “Hydrodynamics of Turbid Underflows. I: Formulation and Numerical Analysis” . In: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 125.10 (1999), pp. 1006–1015. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733- 9429(1999)125:10(1006)

    work page doi:10.1061/(asce)0733- 1999

  10. [10]

    Well-balanced physics-based finite volume schemes for Saint-Venant-Exner-type models of sediment transport

    R. Bürger, E. D. Fernández-Nieto, J. Garres-Díaz, and J. Moya. “Well-balanced physics-based finite volume schemes for Saint-Venant-Exner-type models of sediment transport” . In: Advances in Water Resources (2025), p. 105178

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    A multilayer shallow water approach for polydisperse sedimentation with sediment compressibility and mixture viscosity

    R. Bürger, E. D. Fernández-Nieto, and V. Osores. “A multilayer shallow water approach for polydisperse sedimentation with sediment compressibility and mixture viscosity” . In: Journal of Scientific Computing 85 (2020), pp. 1–40. doi: 10.1007/s10915-020-01334-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s10915-020-01334-6 2020

  12. [12]

    On hyperbolicity of 13-moment system

    Z. Cai, Y. Fan, and R. Li. “On hyperbolicity of 13-moment system” . In: Kinetic and Related Models 7.3 (2014), pp. 415–432. doi: 10.3934/krm.2014.7.415

    work page doi:10.3934/krm.2014.7.415 2014

  13. [13]

    Phase-lag effects in sheet flow transport

    B. Camenen and M. Larson. “Phase-lag effects in sheet flow transport” . In: Coastal Engineering 53.5 (2006), pp. 531–542. issn: 0378-3839. doi: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2005.12.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.coastaleng.2005.12.003 2006

  14. [14]

    Vertically-averaged and moment equations for flow and sediment transport

    F. N. Cantero-Chinchilla, O. Castro-Orgaz, and A. A. Khan. “Vertically-averaged and moment equations for flow and sediment transport” . In: Advances in Water Resources 132 (2019), p. 103387. issn: 0309-1708. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.103387

    work page doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.103387 2019

  15. [15]

    Sediment transport models in shallow water equations and numerical approach by high order finite volume methods

    M. J. Castro Díaz, E. D. Fernández-Nieto, and A. M. Ferreiro. “Sediment transport models in shallow water equations and numerical approach by high order finite volume methods” . In: Computers and Fluids 37.3 (2008), pp. 299–316. issn: 0045-7930. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2007.07.017

    work page doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2007.07.017 2008

  16. [16]

    Bedload transport in shallow water models: Why splitting (may) fail, how hyperbolicity (can) help

    S. Cordier, M. H. Le, and T. Morales de Luna. “Bedload transport in shallow water models: Why splitting (may) fail, how hyperbolicity (can) help” . In: Advances in Water Resources 34.8 (2011), pp. 980–989. issn: 0309-1708. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.05.002. 33

    work page doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.05.002 2011

  17. [17]

    Novel Numerical Approach for 1D Variable Density Shallow Flows over Uneven Rigid and Erodible Beds

    L. Cozzolino, L. Cimorelli, C. Covelli, R. Della Morte, and D. Pianese. “Novel Numerical Approach for 1D Variable Density Shallow Flows over Uneven Rigid and Erodible Beds” . In: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 140.3 (2014), pp. 254–268. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000821

    work page doi:10.1061/(asce)hy.1943-7900.0000821 2014

  18. [18]

    On Lagrange-Projection Schemes for Shallow Water Flows over Movable Bottom with Suspended and Bedload Transport

    A. Del Grosso, M. J. Castro Díaz, C. Chalons, and T. Morales de Luna. “On Lagrange-Projection Schemes for Shallow Water Flows over Movable Bottom with Suspended and Bedload Transport” . In: Numerical Mathematics: Theory, Methods and Applications 16.4 (2023), pp. 1087–1126. issn: 2079-7338. doi: 10.4208/ nmtma.OA-2023-0082

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    A Moment-Based Chezy Formula for Bed Shear Stress in Varied Flow

    M. Elgamal. “A Moment-Based Chezy Formula for Bed Shear Stress in Varied Flow” . In: Water 13.9 (2021), p. 1254. doi: 10.3390/w13091254

    work page doi:10.3390/w13091254 2021

  20. [20]

    On the efficient implementation of PVM methods and simple Riemann solvers. Application to the Roe method for large hyperbolic systems

    Ernesto, C. Parés, M. J. Castro Díaz, and J. Koellermeier. “On the efficient implementation of PVM methods and simple Riemann solvers. Application to the Roe method for large hyperbolic systems” . In: Applied Mathematics and Computation 388 (2021), p. 125544. issn: 0096-3003. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2020.125544

    work page doi:10.1016/j.amc.2020.125544 2021

  21. [21]

    Formulas for Bed-Load Transport

    M. P. Eugen and M. Robert. “Formulas for Bed-Load Transport” . In: Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the International Association for Hydraulic Structures Research . Delft, Netherlands, 1948, pp. 39–64

    work page 1948

  22. [22]

    L. C. Evans. Partial Differential Equations . 2nd ed. Vol. 19. Graduate Studies in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, 2010. isbn: 9780821849743

    work page 2010

  23. [23]

    Zur Physik der Dünen

    F. M. Exner Ewarten. “Zur Physik der Dünen” . In:Sitzungsberichte der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien 129 (1920), pp. 929–952

    work page 1920

  24. [24]

    Über die Wechselwirkung zwischen Wasser und Geschiebe in Flüssen

    F. M. Exner Ewarten. “Über die Wechselwirkung zwischen Wasser und Geschiebe in Flüssen” . In: Sitzungs- berichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse 134.2a (1925), pp. 165–204

    work page 1925

  25. [25]

    Erosion and transport of bed-load sediment

    R. Fernandez Luque and R. Van Beek. “Erosion and transport of bed-load sediment” . In: Journal of Hydraulic Research 14.2 (1976), pp. 127–144. doi: 10.1080/00221687609499677

    work page doi:10.1080/00221687609499677 1976

  26. [26]

    A depth-integrated model for suspended sediment transport

    G. Galappatti and C. Vreugdenhil. “A depth-integrated model for suspended sediment transport” . In: Journal of Hydraulic Research 23.4 (1985), pp. 359–377

    work page 1985

  27. [27]

    Experiments on the entrainment of sediment into suspension by a dense bottom current

    M. H. Garcia and G. Parker. “Experiments on the entrainment of sediment into suspension by a dense bottom current” . In:Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 98.C3 (1993), pp. 4793–4807. doi: 10.1029/92JC02404

    work page doi:10.1029/92jc02404 1993

  28. [28]

    Shallow Water Moment Models for Bedload Transport Problems

    J. Garres-Díaz, M. J. Castro Díaz, J. Koellermeier, and T. Morales de Luna. “Shallow Water Moment Models for Bedload Transport Problems” . In: Communications in Computational Physics 30.3 (2021), pp. 903–941. issn: 1991-7120. doi: 10.4208/cicp.OA-2020-0152

    work page doi:10.4208/cicp.oa-2020-0152 2021

  29. [29]

    A General Vertical Decomposition of Euler Equations: Multilayer-Moment Models

    J. Garres-Díaz, A. Escamilla-Sánchez, T. Morales de Luna, and M. J. Castro Díaz. “A General Vertical Decomposition of Euler Equations: Multilayer-Moment Models” . In: Applied Numerical Mathematics 183 (2023), pp. 236–262. doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2022.09.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apnum.2022.09.004 2023

  30. [30]

    A robust model for rapidly varying flows over movable bottom with suspended and bedload transport: Modelling and numerical approach

    J. C. González-Aguirre, M. J. Castro, and T. Morales de Luna. “A robust model for rapidly varying flows over movable bottom with suspended and bedload transport: Modelling and numerical approach” . In: Advances in Water Resources 140 (2020), p. 103575. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103575

    work page doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103575 2020

  31. [31]

    Numerical simulation of bed load and suspended load sediment transport using well-balanced numerical schemes

    J. C. González-Aguirre, J. A. González-Vázquez, J. Alavez-Ramírez, R. Silva, and M. E. Vázquez-Cendón. “Numerical simulation of bed load and suspended load sediment transport using well-balanced numerical schemes” . In: Communications on Applied Mathematics and Computation 5.2 (2023), pp. 885–922. doi: 10.1007/s42967-021-00162-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s42967-021-00162-1 2023

  32. [32]

    Equilibrium Stability Analysis of Hyperbolic Shallow Water Moment Equations

    Q. Huang, J. Koellermeier, and W.-A. Yong. “Equilibrium Stability Analysis of Hyperbolic Shallow Water Moment Equations” . In: Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences 45.10 (2022), pp. 6459–6480. doi: 10.1002/mma.8180

    work page doi:10.1002/mma.8180 2022

  33. [33]

    Applicability of Sediment Transport Capacity Formulas to Dam-Break Flows over Movable Beds

    G. Kesserwani, S. Elghobashi, and A. Labeeb. “Applicability of Sediment Transport Capacity Formulas to Dam-Break Flows over Movable Beds” . In: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 136.5 (2010), pp. 298–307. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000298

    work page doi:10.1061/(asce)hy.1943-7900.0000298 2010

  34. [34]

    Derivation and Numerical Solution of Hyperbolic Moment Equations for Rarefied Gas Flows

    J. Koellermeier. “Derivation and Numerical Solution of Hyperbolic Moment Equations for Rarefied Gas Flows” . PhD thesis. R WTH Aachen University, 2017. doi: 10.18154/RWTH-2017-07475

    work page doi:10.18154/rwth-2017-07475 2017

  35. [35]

    Steady States and Well-balanced Schemes for Shallow Water Moment Equations with Topography

    J. Koellermeier and E. Pimentel-García. “Steady States and Well-balanced Schemes for Shallow Water Moment Equations with Topography” . In: Journal of Computational Physics 429 (2021), p. 109951. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109951. 34

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109951 2021

  36. [36]

    120211.220911s

    J. Koellermeier and M. Rominger. “Analysis and Numerical Simulation of Hyperbolic Shallow Water Moment Equations” . In:Communications in Computational Physics 28.3 (2020), pp. 1038–1084. doi: 10.4208/cicp. OA-2019-0065

    work page doi:10.4208/cicp 2020

  37. [37]

    Moment Approximations and Model Cascades for Shallow Flow

    J. Kowalski and M. Torrilhon. “Moment Approximations and Model Cascades for Shallow Flow” . In: Com- munications in Computational Physics 25.3 (2019), pp. 669–702. issn: 1991-7120. doi: 10.4208/cicp.OA- 2017-0263

    work page doi:10.4208/cicp.oa- 2019

  38. [38]

    Laboratory experiments and numerical simulation of sediment-wave formation by turbidity currents

    Y. Kubo and T. Nakajima. “Laboratory experiments and numerical simulation of sediment-wave formation by turbidity currents” . In: Marine Geology 192.1 (2002), pp. 105–121. issn: 0025-3227. doi: 10.1016/S0025- 3227(02)00551-0

    work page doi:10.1016/s0025- 2002

  39. [39]

    Experimental and numerical study of topographic effects on deposition from two-dimensional, particle-driven density currents

    Y. Kubo. “Experimental and numerical study of topographic effects on deposition from two-dimensional, particle-driven density currents” . In: Sedimentary Geology 164.3 (2004), pp. 311–326. issn: 0037-0738. doi: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2003.11.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.sedgeo.2003.11.002 2004

  40. [40]

    A well-balanced central-upwind scheme for the thermal rotating shallow water equations

    A. Kurganov, Y. Liu, and V. Zeitlin. “A well-balanced central-upwind scheme for the thermal rotating shallow water equations” . In: Journal of Computational Physics 411 (2020), p. 109414

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    Bed load transport in turbulent flow at the grain scale: Ex- periments and modeling

    E. Lajeunesse, L. Malverti, and F. Charru. “Bed load transport in turbulent flow at the grain scale: Ex- periments and modeling” . In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface 115.F4 (2010), F04001. doi: 10.1029/2009JF001628

    work page doi:10.1029/2009jf001628 2010

  42. [42]

    Localized exponential time differencing method for shal- low water equations: Algorithms and numerical study

    X. Meng, T. T. P. Hoang, Z. Wang, and L. Ju. “Localized exponential time differencing method for shal- low water equations: Algorithms and numerical study” . In: Communications in Computational Physics 29.1 (2020), pp. 80–110. doi: 10.4208/cicp.OA-2019-0214

    work page doi:10.4208/cicp.oa-2019-0214 2020

  43. [43]

    On a shallow water model for the simulation of turbidity currents

    T. Morales de Luna, M. J. Castro Díaz, C. Parés Madroñal, and E. D. Fernández Nieto. “On a shallow water model for the simulation of turbidity currents” . In: Communications in Computational Physics 6.4 (2009), pp. 848–882. issn: 1991-7120. doi: https://doi.org/2009-CiCP-7709

    work page 2009

  44. [44]

    Coastal bottom boundary layers and sediment transport

    P. Nielsen. “Coastal bottom boundary layers and sediment transport” . In: World Sci., River Edge, NJ (1992)

    work page 1992

  45. [45]

    Self-accelerating turbidity currents

    G. Parker, Y. Fukushima, and H. M. Pantin. “Self-accelerating turbidity currents” . In: Journal of Fluid Mechanics 171 (1986), pp. 145–181. doi: 10.1017/S0022112086001404

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022112086001404 1986

  46. [46]

    Sediment transport in oscillatory boundary layers in cases of rippled beds and sheet flow

    J. S. Ribberink and A. Al-Salem. “Sediment transport in oscillatory boundary layers in cases of rippled beds and sheet flow” . In: Journal of Geophysical Research 99.C6 (1994), pp. 12, 707–12, 727. doi: 10.1029/ 94JC00380

    work page 1994

  47. [47]

    L. C. Rijn. Mathematical modelling of morphological processes in the case of suspended sediment transport . Delft, Netherlands, 1987

    work page 1987

  48. [48]

    Efficient computational models for shallow water flows over multilayer erodible beds

    T. Rowan and M. Seaid. “Efficient computational models for shallow water flows over multilayer erodible beds” . In: Engineering Computations 37.2 (2020), pp. 401–429

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    Dispersion in Shallow Moment Equations

    U. Scholz, J. Kowalski, and M. Torrilhon. “Dispersion in Shallow Moment Equations” . In: Computational and Applied Mathematics 43.1 (2023), pp. 1–22. doi: 10.1007/s42967-023-00325-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s42967-023-00325-2 2023

  50. [50]

    Small-scale laboratory dam-break waves on movable beds

    B. Spinewine and Y. Zech. “Small-scale laboratory dam-break waves on movable beds” . In: Journal of Hy- draulic Research 45.sup1 (2007), pp. 73–86. doi: 10.1080/00221686.2007.9521834

    work page doi:10.1080/00221686.2007.9521834 2007

  51. [51]

    Shallow Moments to Capture Vertical Structure in Open Curved Shallow Flow

    I. Steldermann, M. Torrilhon, and J. Kowalski. “Shallow Moments to Capture Vertical Structure in Open Curved Shallow Flow” . In: Journal of Computational and Theoretical Transport 52.7 (2023), pp. 475–505. doi: 10.1080/23324309.2023.2284202

    work page doi:10.1080/23324309.2023.2284202 2023

  52. [52]

    Fluvial Hydrodynamics: Hydrodynamic and Sediment Transport Phenomena

    D. Subhasish. “Fluvial Hydrodynamics: Hydrodynamic and Sediment Transport Phenomena” . In: GeoPlanet: Earth and Planetary Sciences (2014)

    work page 2014

  53. [53]

    Capturing Vertical Information in Radially Symmetric Flow Using Hy- perbolic Shallow Water Moment Equations

    R. Verbiest and J. Koellermeier. “Capturing Vertical Information in Radially Symmetric Flow Using Hy- perbolic Shallow Water Moment Equations” . In: Communications in Computational Physics 37.3 (2025), pp. 810–848. issn: 1991-7120. doi: 10.4208/cicp.OA-2024-0047

    work page doi:10.4208/cicp.oa-2024-0047 2025

  54. [54]

    Zhang and J

    R. Zhang and J. Xie. Sedimentation research in China: Systematic selections . Beijing: China Water and Power Press, 1993. isbn: 9787120019433

    work page 1993

  55. [55]

    Comparison of depth-averaged concentration and bed load flux sediment transport models of dam-break flow

    J. Zhao, I. Özgen-Xian, D. Liang, and R. Hinkelmann. “Comparison of depth-averaged concentration and bed load flux sediment transport models of dam-break flow” . In: Water Science and Engineering 10.4 (2017), pp. 287–294. doi: 10.1016/j.wse.2017.12.006. 35

    work page doi:10.1016/j.wse.2017.12.006 2017

  56. [56]

    A depth-averaged non-cohesive sediment transport model with improved discretization of flux and source terms

    J. Zhao, I. Özgen-Xian, D. Liang, T. Wang, and R. Hinkelmann. “A depth-averaged non-cohesive sediment transport model with improved discretization of flux and source terms” . In: Journal of Hydrology 570 (2019), pp. 647–665. issn: 0022-1694. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.059

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.059 2019

  57. [57]

    Entrainment, transport and deposition of sediment by saline gravity currents

    J. Zordan, C. Juez, A. J. Schleiss, and M. J. Franca. “Entrainment, transport and deposition of sediment by saline gravity currents” . In: Advances in Water Resources 115 (2018), pp. 17–32. issn: 0309-1708. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.02.017. Appendices A Derivation of the complete reference system A.1 Mapping of the mass balance From the divergence-fre...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.02.017 2018

  58. [58]

    (131) Adding ( K ′ u) and ( K ′ α,1) gives ∂tK1 + ∂x 1 2 hu3 m + gβ 2 h2cm um + α1 3 + 1 6 humα2 1 + gh um ∂x(h + hb) + um ∂x 1 3 hα2 1 + 1 3 hα2 1 ∂xum = gβ 2 cm ∂x h2 um + α1 3 − ϵ |um + α1| (um + α1)2 − 4ν h α2 1 + Sm 1 2 u2 m + umα1 + 1 2 α2 1 . (132) Finally, use the identity um ∂x 1 3 hα2 1 + 1 3 hα2 1 ∂xum + ∂x 1 6 humα2 1 = ∂x 1 2 humα2 1 , (133) ...

    work page