Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 176 references

Connecting the m-dots: accretion rates and thermonuclear burst recurrence times on neutron stars and white dwarfs

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Thermonuclear burst recurrence on neutron stars and white dwarfs is set by one number: the local mass-accretion rate.

desk verdict Useful compilation, but the unification claim is asserted rather than shown—the combined correlation is null and the area check has a factor-two radius error. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.22302 v1 pith:R22COJNT submitted 2025-05-28 astro-ph.HE

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords thermonuclearrunawaystypeIX-rayburstsrecurrentnovaemassaccretionraterecurrencetimeneutronstarswhitedwarfsshellflashes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the same physical quantity—the local mass-accretion rate $\dot m$ (mass landing per unit surface area per second)—controls when thermonuclear shell flashes repeat, whether they happen on a neutron star or a white dwarf. It assembles observed recurrence times for 50 type I X-ray bursters, 11 mHz quasi-periodic oscillating neutron-star sources, and 12 recurrent novae, and models the $t_{\rm rec}$–$\dot m$ relation with two ignition codes. The key finding is a roughly inverse-linear $t_{\rm rec} \propto 1/\dot m$ trend that spans both classes, with pure-helium neutron-star models matching the best low-$\dot m$ recurrence-time measurements. The paper closes with an energetics comparison: the eruption-to-burst energy ratio is about $2\times 10^4$, consistent with the surface-area ratio $(R_{\rm WD}/R_{\rm NS})^2 \simeq 4\times 10^4$, implying a similar fuel-column depth ignites in both. If true, a single $\dot m$-based ignition criterion would replace object-class-specific burst theory with one unifying rule.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the empirically built $t_{\rm rec}$–$\dot m$ plane, where $\dot m = \dot M / (4\pi R^2)$ is the accretion rate per unit surface area: for neutron stars $\dot M$ comes from X-ray luminosity via the general-relativistic expression in Eq. (1), and for white dwarfs from disk, flickering, and line-strength estimates. Two theory tools generate the model curves: SHIVA, a hydrodynamic Lagrangian stellar-evolution code that computes ignition tracks for solar-composition accretion on white dwarfs and neutron stars, and SETTLE, a semi-analytic pure-helium accretion-layer ignition code used for low-$\dot m$ neutron-star bursts. The closing identity is the ignition-depth formula $y = E_b(1+z)/(4\pi R^2 Q_{\rm nucl})$, which converts a measured radiated energy into a fuel-column depth and lets the paper compare a nova eruption with a neutron-star burst on the same physical scale.

What would settle it

A concrete test is to measure an independent mass-accretion rate for recurrent novae—e.g., from eclipse timing or donor-star mass transfer instead of disk luminosity—and check whether they remain on the neutron-star $t_{\rm rec} \propto 1/\dot m$ line. The sharpest point is the overlap pair M31N 2008-12a and 1RXS J171824.2-402934: a 30% systematic correction to either object's $\dot m$ that moves it off the shared line would contradict the claim that ignition depends only on specific accretion rate.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that thermonuclear runaways on neutron stars and white dwarfs are the same phenomenon read through different surface areas: ignition depends primarily on the specific mass accretion rate $\dot m$, not on whether the accretor is a neutron star or a white dwarf. The paper supports this by compiling $\dot m$ and recurrence time $t_{\rm rec}$ for bursts and eruptions, finding that together the two classes fill the $t_{\rm rec}$–$\dot m$ plane over five orders of magnitude in $\dot m$ and six in $t_{\rm rec}$ and are roughly consistent with a global $t_{\rm rec} \propto 1/\dot m$ relation. Within the white-dwarf sample alone the correlation is weak, but the two deepest anchors—the rapid recurrent nova M31N 2008-12a and the neutron-star burster 1RXS J171824.2-402934—have comparable $\dot m$ and $t_{\rm rec}$, and their inferred ignition depths differ by only a factor of about 2–6. The energy released, about $2\times10^4$ times larger for the nova, matches the roughly $4\times10^4$ ratio of surface areas, showing the difference in energy is geometric rather than physical. The paper concludes that the nature of the compact object is not the deciding variable.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the inferred local mass-accretion rates are accurate and comparable across samples, since neutron-star rates come from X-ray luminosity under isotropic-emission and bolometric-correction assumptions while white-dwarf rates come from heterogeneous disk, flickering, and line-strength methods that can disagree by orders of magnitude for the same system—if those estimates are biased, the unified $t_{\rm rec}$–$\dot m$ relation is an artifact.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single $\dot m$-based ignition criterion could be used to predict recurrence times for newly discovered bursters and recurrent novae once their accretion rate is measured, without needing separate neutron-star and white-dwarf theories.
  • The best-constrained low-$\dot m$ ultra-compact X-ray binaries, 4U 0614+09 and 2S 0918-549, fall on the pure-helium SETTLE track with $Q_b = 2$ MeV nucleon$^{-1}$, strengthening the case that these systems accrete helium.
  • At a fixed ignition depth, a white-dwarf eruption should release roughly $10^4$ times more energy than a neutron-star burst with the same recurrence time and $\dot m$, simply because the white-dwarf surface is larger.
  • The inverse $t_{\rm rec} \propto 1/\dot m$ relation is primarily a low-accretion-rate behavior; at $\dot m \gtrsim 10\% \dot m_{\rm Edd}$ the burst-frequency phenomenology bifurcates, so spin, geometry, and mixing enter as secondary controls.
  • mHz quasi-periodic oscillations, whose timescale anti-correlates with $\dot m$ (Pearson $r=-0.85$), can serve as a $\dot m$ indicator for accreting neutron stars, helping to place future sources on the same plane.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial: if the unification holds, carbon-fueled superbursts on neutron stars may occupy a parallel long-recurrence track on the same $\dot m$ axis rather than breaking the relation; the paper excludes them by design, so this is an untested extension.
  • Editorial: extending the same $\dot m$-based logic to helium novae in AM CVn systems predicts recurrence times that could be checked once their accretion rates are measured from disk SEDs.
  • Editorial: the white-dwarf sample's weak correlation could sharpen if recurrence-time upper limits for KT Eri and IM Nor were replaced by measured values; that is a concrete observational path to confirming or refuting the unification.
  • Editorial: the paper's energy comparison uses one eruption estimate for M31N 2008-12a; a bolometric light-curve integration over a full eruption would give a direct test of the $E_b \propto R^2$ scaling.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper compiles recurrence times t_rec and inferred local mass-accretion rates mdot for 50 Galactic type-I X-ray bursters, 11 sources with mHz QPOs, and 12 recurrent novae (Galactic, LMC, and M31). It computes theoretical t_rec–mdot tracks with SHIVA for hydrogen-rich X-ray bursts and white-dwarf nova eruptions, and with pysettle/SETTLE for pure-He bursts, then compares these with the data. The authors claim a global inverse-linear t_rec ∝ 1/mdot relation connecting neutron-star and white-dwarf thermonuclear runaways, propose that XTE J1701-462 may be a slow rotator based on its mHz QPO location, and argue from a comparison of M31N 2008-12a and 1RXS J171824.2-402934 that the difference in eruption/burst energy is consistent with the area ratio and that the two systems ignite at similar column depths.

Significance. A unified ignition criterion across neutron stars and white dwarfs would be an important result, and the compiled samples are a useful resource. The mHz QPO analysis (§2.2) gives a strong negative correlation (Pearson r=-0.8546, P=4×10^-7), and the SETTLE pure-He models with Q_b=2 MeV/nucleon reproduce the precise recurrence times of 4U 0614+09 and 2S 0918-549. However, the central cross-object claim is not supported by the paper's own correlation statistics, and the energy/area comparison rests on an inconsistent white-dwarf radius. The paper's value is therefore primarily as a compilation and model comparison, not yet as a demonstration of a universal ignition law.

major comments (4)
  1. [§5.1, Abstract, Fig. 4] The claim that neutron stars and white dwarfs follow a global inverse-linear t_rec–mdot relation is contradicted by the paper's own statistics: the combined NS+WD sample has Pearson r=-0.1258 (P=0.3298), the WD-only sample has r=-0.2924 (P=0.3564), and the joint power-law fit gives α=-0.705, not α=-1. The visual trend in Fig. 4 comes from extrapolating the Clocked Burster's 1/mdot track over many orders of magnitude, not from the joint data. The authors should either demonstrate a significant correlation using a method that accounts for lower/upper limits and heteroscedastic errors, or explicitly restate the conclusion as a tentative suggestion rather than a demonstrated relation.
  2. [§5.2, Eq. (2)] The quantitative support for similar ignition depths is internally inconsistent. The 1.38 M_sun WD in M31N 2008-12a is assigned R_WD=2000 km, but Eq. (2) with M_WD=1.38 gives R_WD≈9×10^7 cm ≈900 km. Using the Eq. (2) radius, (R_WD/R_NS)^2≈8×10^3 rather than 4×10^4, and the claimed consistency with E_b,WD/E_b,NS≈2×10^4 no longer holds. A single, justified mass–radius relation must be used throughout, and the area ratio and ignition depths must be recomputed.
  3. [§3.1, Table 3] The WD mdot values are derived from heterogeneous methods (disk SED fits, He II 4686 line strengths, flickering, boundary-layer models, P-dot estimates) and for several systems span orders of magnitude, e.g. U Sco (4–7)×10^-9 to (1–9)×10^-7 M_sun/yr and M31N 2008-12a 10^-7–10^-5 M_sun/yr. Since every point in Figs. 3 and 4 depends on these local rates, the paper should quantify how the fitted t_rec–mdot relation and its significance change when alternative mdot estimates are adopted, or state explicitly that current data cannot discriminate between a universal relation and one with substantial object-dependent scatter.
  4. [§4.3, Figs. 1 and 3] The SHIVA model curves use the computed time to first burst as t_rec, with the assumption that the time between bursts stays constant. This assumption needs justification or testing: for a non-stationary burst train the model curves would not represent observed mean recurrence times. In addition, the SETTLE sequence with Q_b=2 MeV/nucleon is presented as the successful model; because Q_b is a free parameter chosen to match the UCXB data, the agreement should be framed as a calibration rather than an independent prediction.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.1, Table 1] The text for SRGA J144459.2-604207 gives L_acc=5–22% L_Edd, while Table 1 lists 5–23%; please make these consistent.
  2. [Table 1 references] Several reference labels in Table 1 do not match entries in the reference list (e.g., an item labeled (46) for 1RXS J180408.9-342058); please renumber and cross-check.
  3. [Abstract] The phrase 'ignitions ... do not depend on the nature' has a subject–verb agreement issue; it should be 'do not depend' with the plural subject or 'does not depend' with a singular subject.
  4. [§2.3] The text attributes the deviating EXO 0748-676 and XTE J1710-281 points to possible inclination effects; it would be informative to state whether excluding these two systems changes the NS-sample correlation.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Auxiliary model/consistency checks are partly constructed (Q_b selected to match UCXBs; R_WD assumed so the area ratio agrees), while the central NS–WD t_rec–mdot comparison is an empirical compilation and not itself circular.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4.3 (SETTLE) and Abstract]
    "To estimate the $t_{\rm rec}-\dot m$ relation for pure He bursts on NSs at a wide range of $\dot m$, we run two sequences of models with settle using $Q_b=1$ and 2 MeV nucleon$^{-1}$. ... it is evident that the XRB ignition for pure He and $Q_b=2$ MeV nucleon$^{-1}$ agrees very well with the observations at $\dot M \lesssim 1\% \dot M_{\rm Edd}$. The two UCXBs 4U 0614+09 and 2S 0918-549, which have the most precise $t_{\rm rec}$ constraints ... are connected by these $Q_b=2$ MeV nucleon$^{-1}$ models."

    Q_b is not fixed independently in this test: the paper runs two discrete values and then highlights the one that reproduces the same two UCXBs used to claim agreement. The Abstract's 'theoretical models of pure He bursts are in agreement with the best t_rec measurements' is therefore a selected match rather than a parameter-free prediction. Without an a priori, independent determination of Q_b, the agreement does not validate the t_rec-mdot relation by itself.

  2. other [Section 5.2, compared with Eq. (2) in Section 3.1]
    "For a 1.38 $M_\odot$, 2000 km radius WD, the redshift is $z=1\times10^{-3}$. ... With the assumed radii, estimated $E_b$ and inferred $y$, the ratio between WD and NS areas is $(R_{\rm WD}/R_{\rm NS})^2=4\times10^4$, while the energy ratio is $E_{b\rm WD}/E_{b\rm NS}=2\times10^4$. We conclude that ... the difference in eruption/burst energy is consistent with the difference in radius and area between NSs and WDs."

    The area ratio used in this consistency check is computed from an assumed WD radius of 2000 km, but Eq. (2), the mass-radius relation used to derive every WD mdot in Table 3, gives R_WD ~= 900 km for M_WD = 1.38 M_sun. With the paper's own radius relation the area ratio is about 8e3, not 4e4, so the claimed factor-of-two agreement with the energy ratio disappears. The check is thus an artifact of the assumed input radius rather than an independent confirmation of similar ignition depth.

full rationale

The central claim, that t_rec versus local mdot approximately connects NS and WD thermonuclear runaways, is built from a literature compilation and model curves; it is not derived from those curves by definition. The paper's own statistics, however, are in tension with the claim: the combined NS+WD sample has Pearson c=-0.1258 (P=0.3298) and the WD-only sample c=-0.2924 (P=0.3564), and the joint power-law index is -0.705 rather than -1. That is a correctness/support problem, not a circularity. No load-bearing self-citation or imported uniqueness theorem appears; the Linares/Jenke measurements used for UCXBs are published observations and are legitimate data. The identifiable circularity is limited to two auxiliary 'agreement' checks: the SETTLE match is obtained after selecting Q_b=2 among the two values run, and the energy-versus-area consistency in Sec. 5.2 uses R_WD=2000 km, inconsistent with the paper's own Eq. (2), making the numerical agreement depend on an assumed radius. These affect secondary supporting arguments; the central comparison retains independent empirical content, so a moderate score is appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central comparison rests on assumptions about converting observed luminosities into accretion rates, model choices for base heating, and a simplified WD radius relation. The modeling assumes mdot is the controlling variable, which is the hypothesis being tested.

free parameters (3)
  • Q_b (SETTLE deep-heating parameter) = 2 MeV/nucleon (also 1 MeV/nucleon computed)
    Sets the crust/base heat flux in pure He ignition models; the value that best matches UCXB t_rec data is highlighted in Fig. 1.
  • L_base (SHIVA base luminosity for H bursts) = 0.1 and 1.0 L_sun
    Imposed at the base of the NS envelope in H burst models; varied to produce two t_rec-mdot tracks.
  • M_WD (SHIVA white dwarf mass tracks) = 1.38, 1.35, 1.25 M_sun
    Chosen to bracket the masses of observed RNe; L_WD fixed at 1 L_sun and Z=Z_sun.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption NS accretion luminosity is entirely gravitational potential energy released at the surface: Mdot = L_acc (1+z)^2/(z c^2)
    Used in Eq. (1) for all NS points; ignores e.g. spin-down luminosity, boundary layer effects.
  • domain assumption White dwarf mass-radius relation R_WD(10^8 cm) = M_WD^{-1/3}
    Used to compute mdot in Table 3; a simplified relation for massive WDs, with an apparent inconsistency in the radius adopted in Sec. 5.2.
  • domain assumption Bolometric corrections and isotropic emission convert measured X-ray flux to accretion luminosity
    Adopted from multiple references with a 30% systematic uncertainty; affects every NS mdot.
  • ad hoc to paper The time between bursts is constant and equal to the time to first burst in SHIVA models
    Stated in Section 4.3 to infer t_rec from a grid of models.
  • domain assumption UCXBs accrete H-poor (pure He) fuel
    Basis for comparing SETTLE pure He models to 4U 0614+09 and 2S 0918-549.
  • standard math Ignition depth formula y = E_b(1+z)/(4 pi R^2 Q_nucl)
    Used in Sec. 5.2 to infer ignition depths from energies.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Connecting the m-dots: accretion rates and thermonuclear burst recurrence times on neutron stars and white dwarfs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/R22COJNT

@misc{pith2026250522302,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Connecting the m-dots: accretion rates and thermonuclear burst recurrence times on neutron stars and white dwarfs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/R22COJNT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.22302}
}
abstract

We present a compilation of observed recurrence times ($t_{\rm rec}$) and infer the corresponding local mass-accretion rates ($\dot m$) for type I X-ray bursts, milliHertz quasi-periodic oscillating sources and recurrent novae eruptions. We construct models of the $t_{\rm rec}-\dot m$ relation for accreting white dwarfs and neutron stars and find that both are roughly consistent with a global inverse linear relation, connecting for the first time thermonuclear runaways on neutron stars and white dwarfs. We find that theoretical models of pure He bursts are in agreement with the best $t_{\rm rec}$ measurements in ultra-compact X-ray binaries at low $\dot m$ (4U~$0614+09$ and 2S~0918-549). We suggest that the transient Z source XTE~J1701-462 is a slow rotator, based on its mHz QPO properties. Finally, we discuss the implications for thermonuclear ignition and point out that the difference in eruption/burst energy ($E_{b_{WD}}/E_{b_{NS}}=2\times 10^4$) is consistent with the difference in area between neutron stars and white dwarfs $\left((R_{WD}/R_{NS})^2=4\times 10^4\right)$. We conclude that ignitions of thermonuclear shell flashes on neutron stars and white dwarfs depend primarily on the specific mass accretion rate and do not depend on the nature of the underlying compact object.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.22302 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Observations and models of 𝑡rec of type I X-ray bursts on NSs listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The inverse frequency of mHz QPOs listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Recurrence times of nova eruptions on RNe listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Recurrence times of XRBs and eruptions, and corresponding 𝑚¤ on NSs and WDs. Symbols represent bursters (as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

176 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

  2. [2]

    Alizai K., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad374 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521.3608A 521, 3608

  3. [3]

    Altamirano D., Casella P., Patruno A., Wijnands R., van der Klis M., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/528983 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...674L..45A 674, L45

  4. [4]

    Armas Padilla M., Degenaar N., Wijnands R., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1114 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.434.1586A 434, 1586

  5. [5]

    P., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt860 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.433.1951A 433, 1951

    Armstrong R. P., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt860 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.433.1951A 433, 1951

  6. [6]

    M., Banerjee D

    Ashok N. M., Banerjee D. P. K., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20031160 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...409.1007A 409, 1007

  7. [7]

    Bagnoli T., in't Zand J. J. M., Galloway D. K., Watts A. L., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt312 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.431.1947B 431, 1947

  8. [8]

    515, The Many Faces of Neutron Stars

    Bildsten L., 1998, in Buccheri R., van Paradijs J., Alpar A., eds, NATO Advanced Study Institute (ASI) Series C Vol. 515, The Many Faces of Neutron Stars. p. 419 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/9709094 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9709094

Show all 176 references
  1. [9]

    I., Dunina-Barkovskaya N

    Blinnikov S. I., Dunina-Barkovskaya N. V., Nadyozhin D. K., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/192334 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJS..106..171B 106, 171

  2. [10]

    F., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/818/2/145 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...818..145B 818, 145

    Bode M. F., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/818/2/145 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...818..145B 818, 145

  3. [11]

    E., Garc \' a L

    Brandi E., Quiroga C., Miko ajewska J., Ferrer O. E., Garc \' a L. G., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200811417 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...497..815B 497, 815

  4. [12]

    Bruch A., 1992, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992A&A...266..237B 266, 237

  5. [13]

    Buisson D. J. K., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2749 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499..793B 499, 793

  6. [14]

    Bult P., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac87f9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...935L..32B 935, L32

  7. [15]

    L., Galloway D

    Cavecchi Y., Watts A. L., Galloway D. K., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9897 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...851....1C 851, 1

  8. [16]

    H., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1038/28561 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998Natur.394..346C 394, 346

    Chakrabarty D., Morgan E. H., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1038/28561 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998Natur.394..346C 394, 346

  9. [17]

    Chandrasekhar S., 1933, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/93.5.390 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1933MNRAS..93..390C 93, 390

  10. [18]

    D., Shen K

    Chomiuk L., Metzger B. D., Shen K. J., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-112420-114502 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ARA&A..59..391C 59, 391

  11. [19]

    R., Wood K

    Cominsky L. R., Wood K. S., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1086/162361 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984ApJ...283..765C 283, 765

  12. [20]

    Cornelisse R., Heise J., Kuulkers E., Verbunt F., in't Zand J. J. M., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0003454 , 357, L21

  13. [21]

    Cornelisse R., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20030629 , 405, 1033

  14. [22]

    P., Crampton D., Hutchings J

    Cowley A. P., Crampton D., Hutchings J. B., 1979, @doi [ ] 10.1086/157216 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979ApJ...231..539C 231, 539

  15. [23]

    Cumming A., 2003, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=2003ApJ...595.1077C&db_key=AST 595, 1077

  16. [24]

    Cumming A., Bildsten L., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/317191 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...544..453C 544, 453

  17. [25]

    Cumming A., Bildsten L., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/323937 , 559, L127

  18. [26]

    Cumming A., Macbeth J., in 't Zand J. J. M., Page D., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/504698 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...646..429C 646, 429

  19. [27]

    J., Henze M., 2020, @doi [Advances in Space Research] 10.1016/j.asr.2019.09.044 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020AdSpR..66.1147D 66, 1147

    Darnley M. J., Henze M., 2020, @doi [Advances in Space Research] 10.1016/j.asr.2019.09.044 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020AdSpR..66.1147D 66, 1147

  20. [28]

    J., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/149 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...833..149D 833, 149

    Darnley M. J., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/149 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...833..149D 833, 149

  21. [29]

    J., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9062 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...849...96D 849, 96

    Darnley M. J., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9062 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...849...96D 849, 96

  22. [30]

    J., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-018-0825-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Natur.565..460D 565, 460

    Darnley M. J., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-018-0825-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Natur.565..460D 565, 460

  23. [31]

    J., Kuin N

    Darnley M. J., Kuin N. P. M., Page K. L., 2024, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ATel16752....1D 16752, 1

  24. [32]

    Dinerstein H., Hoffleit D., 1973, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973IBVS..845....1D 845, 1

  25. [33]

    C., Heinke C

    Engel M. C., Heinke C. O., Sivakoff G. R., Elshamouty K. G., Edmonds P. D., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/747/2/119 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...747..119E 747, 119

  26. [34]

    Falanga M., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201016240 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...529A..68F 529, A68

  27. [35]

    Fiocchi M., Bazzano A., Natalucci L., Landi R., Ubertini P., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01051.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.414L..41F 414, L41

  28. [36]

    Fiocchi M., Bazzano A., Bruni G., Ludlam R., Natalucci L., Onori F., Ubertini P., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4d59 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...887...30F 887, 30

  29. [37]

    Y., Hanawa T., Miyaji S., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1086/159034 , 247, 267

    Fujimoto M. Y., Hanawa T., Miyaji S., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1086/159034 , 247, 267

  30. [38]

    K., Cumming A., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/507598 , 652, 559

    Galloway D. K., Cumming A., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/507598 , 652, 559

  31. [39]

    K., Cumming A., Kuulkers E., Bildsten L., Chakrabarty D., Rothschild R

    Galloway D. K., Cumming A., Kuulkers E., Bildsten L., Chakrabarty D., Rothschild R. E., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/380445 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...601..466G 601, 466

  32. [40]

    K., Muno M

    Galloway D. K., Muno M. P., Hartman J. M., Psaltis D., Chakrabarty D., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/592044 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJS..179..360G 179, 360

  33. [41]

    K., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aabd32 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...857L..24G 857, L24

    Galloway D. K., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aabd32 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...857L..24G 857, L24

  34. [42]

    K., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab9f2e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJS..249...32G 249, 32

    Galloway D. K., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab9f2e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJS..249...32G 249, 32

  35. [43]

    Gladstone J., Done C., Gierli \'n ski M., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11675.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.378...13G 378, 13

  36. [44]

    M., Balman S ., Blair W

    Godon P., Sion E. M., Balman S ., Blair W. P., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7f71 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...846...52G 846, 52

  37. [45]

    J., Galloway D

    Goodwin A. J., Galloway D. K., Heger A., Cumming A., Johnston Z., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2638 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.490.2228G 490, 2228

  38. [46]

    Greiner J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-023-05714-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Natur.615..605G 615, 605

  39. [47]

    Guerriero R., et al., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02651.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999MNRAS.307..179G 307, 179

  40. [48]

    G \"u ver T., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abe1ae , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...910...37G 910, 37

  41. [49]

    Hachisu I., Kato M., Nomoto K., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/310303 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...470L..97H 470, L97

  42. [50]

    L., 1990, , 227, 431

    Haensel P., Zdunik J. L., 1990, , 227, 431

  43. [51]

    L., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20030708 , 404, L33

    Haensel P., Zdunik J. L., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20030708 , 404, L33

  44. [52]

    E., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/517491 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...665.1311H 665, 1311

    Heger A., Cumming A., Woosley S. E., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/517491 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...665.1311H 665, 1311

  45. [53]

    O., Zheng J., Maccarone T

    Heinke C. O., Zheng J., Maccarone T. J., Degenaar N., Bahramian A., Sivakoff G. R., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2407.18867 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240718867H p. arXiv:2407.18867

  46. [54]

    Henze M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab6a6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...857...68H 857, 68

  47. [55]

    A., Rogers F

    Iglesias C. A., Rogers F. J., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/177381 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...464..943I 464, 943

  48. [56]

    A., Linares M., Connaughton V., Beklen E., Camero-Arranz A., Finger M

    Jenke P. A., Linares M., Connaughton V., Beklen E., Camero-Arranz A., Finger M. H., Wilson-Hodge C. A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/228 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...826..228J 826, 228

  49. [57]

    CRC Press

    Jos\'e J., 2016, Stellar explosions: hydrodynamics and nucleosynthesis. CRC Press

  50. [58]

    Jos \'e J., Hernanz M., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305244 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...494..680J 494, 680

  51. [59]

    Jos \'e J., Hernanz M., 2025, , in press

  52. [60]

    N., 2008, in Bode M

    Jos \'e J., Shore S. N., 2008, in Bode M. F., Evans A., eds, , Vol. 43, Classical Novae. Cambridge University Press, pp 121--149, @doi 10.1017/CBO9780511536168.008

  53. [61]

    M., Psaltis D., Chakrabarty D., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/324225 , 560, L59

    Juett A. M., Psaltis D., Chakrabarty D., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/324225 , 560, L59

  54. [62]

    Kahabka P., van den Heuvel E. P. J., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.69 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ARA&A..35...69K 35, 69

  55. [63]

    J., Holt S

    Kaluzienski L. J., Holt S. S., Boldt E. A., Serlemitsos P. J., 1976, @doi [ ] 10.1086/182235 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976ApJ...208L..71K 208, L71

  56. [64]

    G., in't Zand J

    Kaptein R. G., in't Zand J. J. M., Kuulkers E., Verbunt F., Heise J., Cornelisse R., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0005453 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...358L..71K 358, L71

  57. [65]

    Kato M., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/830/1/40 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...830...40K 830, 40

  58. [66]

    Kato M., Saio H., Hachisu I., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/838/2/153 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...838..153K 838, 153

  59. [67]

    K., Zand J

    Keek L., Galloway D. K., Zand J. J. M. i. t., Heger A., 2010, @doi [Astrophys. J.] 10.1088/0004-637X/718/1/292 , 718, 292

  60. [68]

    Kuin N. P. M., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2960 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.491..655K 491, 655

  61. [69]

    Kuulkers E., 2004, @doi [Nuclear Physics B Proceedings Supplements] 10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2004.04.081 , 132, 466

  62. [70]

    R., in't Zand J

    Kuulkers E., den Hartog P. R., in't Zand J. J. M., Verbunt F. W. M., Harris W. E., Cocchi M., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20021781 , 399, 663

  63. [71]

    Kuulkers E., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200913210 , 514, A65+

  64. [72]

    Lederle C., Kimeswenger S., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20021539 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...397..951L 397, 951

  65. [73]

    Lewin W. H. G., van Paradijs J., Taam R. E., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1007/BF00196124 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993SSRv...62..223L 62, 223

  66. [74]

    Li Z., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833857 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...620A.114L 620, A114

  67. [75]

    Liller W., 2002, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002IAUC.7789....1L 7789, 1

  68. [76]

    Liller W., Monard L. A. G., 2009, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009IAUC.9042....1L 9042, 1

  69. [77]

    Linares M., 2009, PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, Anton Pannekoek Institute for Astronomy

  70. [78]

    Linares M., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/719/1/L84 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...719L..84L 719, L84

  71. [79]

    Linares M., Altamirano D., Chakrabarty D., Cumming A., Keek L., 2012a, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/748/2/82 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...748...82L 748, 82

  72. [80]

    Linares M., et al., 2012b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/760/2/133 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...760..133L 760, 133

  73. [81]

    P., 2009, @doi [Landolt B \"o rnstein] 10.1007/978-3-540-88055-4_34 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009LanB...4B..712L 4B, 712

    Lodders K., Palme H., Gail H. P., 2009, @doi [Landolt B \"o rnstein] 10.1007/978-3-540-88055-4_34 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009LanB...4B..712L 4B, 712

  74. [82]

    K., Rudy R

    Lynch D. K., Rudy R. J., Mazuk S., Puetter R. C., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309453 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...541..791L 541, 791

  75. [83]

    C., Altamirano D., Garc \' a F., Lyu M., M \'e ndez M., Combi J

    Mancuso G. C., Altamirano D., Garc \' a F., Lyu M., M \'e ndez M., Combi J. A., D \' az-Trigo M., in't Zand J. J. M., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slz057 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.486L..74M 486, L74

  76. [84]

    C., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad949 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521.5616M 521, 5616

    Mancuso G. C., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad949 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521.5616M 521, 5616

  77. [85]

    Mandal M., Pal S., Chauhan J., Lohfink A., Bharali P., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad604 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521..881M 521, 881

  78. [86]

    Margon B., Lampton M., Bowyer S., Cruddace R., 1971, @doi [ ] 10.1086/180806 , 169, L23+

  79. [87]

    Masetti N., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20011642 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002A&A...381L..45M 381, L45

  80. [88]

    P., Rushton M

    Maxwell M. P., Rushton M. T., Eyres S. P. S., 2014, in Woudt P. A., Ribeiro V. A. R. M., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 490, Stellar Novae: Past and Future Decades. p. 205 ( @eprint arXiv 1305.3424 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.1305.3424

  81. [89]

    V., Revnivtsev M

    Meshcheryakov A. V., Revnivtsev M. G., Pavlinsky M. N., Khamitov I., Bikmaev I. F., 2010, @doi [Astronomy Letters] 10.1134/S106377371010004X , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AstL...36..738M 36, 738

  82. [90]

    M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa87b6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...847...99M 847, 99

    Miko ajewska J., Shara M. M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa87b6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...847...99M 847, 99

  83. [91]

    M., Udalski A., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1058 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.504.2122M 504, 2122

    Miko ajewska J., I kiewicz K., Ga an C., Monard B., Otulakowska-Hypka M., Shara M. M., Udalski A., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1058 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.504.2122M 504, 2122

  84. [92]

    Molkov S., Revnivtsev M., Lutovinov A., Sunyaev R., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20041846 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...434.1069M 434, 1069

  85. [93]

    V., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2404.19709 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240419709M p

    Molkov S. V., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2404.19709 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240419709M p. arXiv:2404.19709

  86. [94]

    R., Kahn S

    Mukai K., Kinkhabwala A., Peterson J. R., Kahn S. M., Paerels F., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/374583 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...586L..77M 586, L77

  87. [95]

    Munari U., 2012, JAAVSO, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012JAVSO..40..582M 40, 582

  88. [96]

    S., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/379211 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...599..419N 599, 419

    Narayan R., Heyl J. S., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/379211 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...599..419N 599, 419

  89. [97]

    G., Marsh T

    Nelemans G., Jonker P. G., Marsh T. R., van der Klis M., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07486.x , 348, L7

  90. [98]

    Nelson T., Mukai K., Orio M., Luna G. J. M., Sokoloski J. L., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/737/1/7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...737....7N 737, 7

  91. [99]

    Ng M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad4edb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...968L...7N 968, L7

  92. [100]

    Nishiyama K., Kabashima F., 2008, CBAT

  93. [101]

    Nomoto K., 1982, @doi [ ] 10.1086/159682 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982ApJ...253..798N 253, 798

  94. [102]

    Paczynski B., Anderson N., 1986, @doi [ ] 10.1086/163966 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986ApJ...302....1P 302, 1

  95. [103]

    M., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6d54 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...931L...9A 931, L9

    Padilla A. M., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6d54 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...931L...9A 931, L9

  96. [104]

    E., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/788/2/164 , 788, 164

    Pagnotta A., Schaefer B. E., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/788/2/164 , 788, 164

  97. [105]

    Papitto A., D'A \` A., Motta S., Riggio A., Burderi L., di Salvo T., Belloni T., Iaria R., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201015974 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...526L...3P 526, L3

  98. [106]

    arXiv:2408.00608

    Papitto A., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2408.00608 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240800608P p. arXiv:2408.00608

  99. [107]

    C., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1086/163188 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985ApJ...292..550P 292, 550

    Patterson J., Raymond J. C., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1086/163188 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985ApJ...292..550P 292, 550

  100. [108]

    Patterson J., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2970 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.466..581P 466, 581

  101. [109]

    Patterson J., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abec87 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...924...27P 924, 27

  102. [110]

    D., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/309 , 725, 309

    Peng F., Ott C. D., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/309 , 725, 309

  103. [111]

    F., Truran J

    Peng F., Brown E. F., Truran J. W., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/509628 , 654, 1022

  104. [112]

    C., 1913, Annals of Harvard College Observatory, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1913AnHar..72...79P 72, 79

    Pickering E. C., 1913, Annals of Harvard College Observatory, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1913AnHar..72...79P 72, 79

  105. [113]

    L., Bildsten L., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/518687 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...663.1252P 663, 1252

    Piro A. L., Bildsten L., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/518687 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...663.1252P 663, 1252

  106. [114]

    M., Shaviv G., 1979, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979A&A....72..192P 72, 192

    Prialnik D., Shara M. M., Shaviv G., 1979, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979A&A....72..192P 72, 192

  107. [115]

    Prodan S., Murray N., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/798/2/117 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...798..117P 798, 117

  108. [116]

    S., et al., 2024, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ATel16480....1R 16480, 1

    Ray P. S., et al., 2024, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ATel16480....1R 16480, 1

  109. [117]

    Revnivtsev M., Churazov E., Gilfanov M., Sunyaev R., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20010434 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...372..138R 372, 138

  110. [118]

    G., Kniazev A., Karasev D

    Revnivtsev M. G., Kniazev A., Karasev D. I., Berdnikov L., Barway S., 2013, @doi [Astronomy Letters] 10.1134/S1063773713080082 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013AstL...39..523R 39, 523

  111. [119]

    T., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014322 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...526A..95R 526, A95

    Riggio A., Papitto A., Burderi L., di Salvo T., Bachetti M., Iaria R., D'A \` A., Menna M. T., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014322 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...526A..95R 526, A95

  112. [120]

    M., El \' as-Rosa N., G \"a nsicke B

    Rodr \' guez-Gil P., Corral-Santana J. M., El \' as-Rosa N., G \"a nsicke B. T., Hernanz M., Sala G., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3124 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.526.4961R 526, 4961

  113. [121]

    E., 2008, in Werner A., Rauch T., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol

    Rosenbush A. E., 2008, in Werner A., Rauch T., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 391, Hydrogen-Deficient Stars. p. 271

  114. [122]

    arXiv:2007.10480

    Rosenbush A., 2020, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2007.10480 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020arXiv200710480R p. arXiv:2007.10480

  115. [123]

    L., Iliadis C., Champange A

    Sallaska A. L., Iliadis C., Champange A. E., Goriely S., Starrfield S., Timmes F. X., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/207/1/18 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJS..207...18S 207, 18

  116. [124]

    E., Dotani T., Asai K., Lehto H

    Sansom A. E., Dotani T., Asai K., Lehto H. J., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/262.2.429 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993MNRAS.262..429S 262, 429

  117. [125]

    E., 2009, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637x/697/1/721 , 697, 721–729

    Schaefer B. E., 2009, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637x/697/1/721 , 697, 721–729

  118. [126]

    E., 2010, @doi [ApJ SS] 10.1088/0067-0049/187/2/275 , 187, 275

    Schaefer B. E., 2010, @doi [ApJ SS] 10.1088/0067-0049/187/2/275 , 187, 275

  119. [127]

    E., 2023, @doi [Journal for the History of Astronomy] 10.1177/00218286231200492 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023JHA....54..436S 54, 436

    Schaefer B. E., 2023, @doi [Journal for the History of Astronomy] 10.1177/00218286231200492 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023JHA....54..436S 54, 436

  120. [128]

    E., Ringwald F

    Schaefer B. E., Ringwald F. A., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309550 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...447L..45S 447, L45

  121. [129]

    E., Pagnotta A., Zoppelt S., 2022a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac443 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512.1924S 512, 1924

    Schaefer B. E., Pagnotta A., Zoppelt S., 2022a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac443 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512.1924S 512, 1924

  122. [130]

    E., Walter F

    Schaefer B. E., Walter F. M., Hounsell R., Hillman Y., 2022b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2923 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.517.3864S 517, 3864

  123. [131]

    Selvelli P., Cassatella A., Gilmozzi R., Gonz \'a lez-Riestra R., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200810678 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...492..787S 492, 787

  124. [132]

    W., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/34 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..216...34S 216, 34

    Shafter A. W., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/34 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..216...34S 216, 34

  125. [133]

    Shafter A. W., Taguchi K., Zhao J., Hornoch K., 2022, @doi [Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society] 10.3847/2515-5172/aca2a6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022RNAAS...6..241S 6, 241

  126. [134]

    W., et al., 2023, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ATel16354....1S 16354, 1

    Shafter A. W., et al., 2023, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ATel16354....1S 16354, 1

  127. [135]

    W., et al., 2024, @doi [Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society] 10.3847/2515-5172/ad19de , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024RNAAS...8....5S 8, 5

    Shafter A. W., et al., 2024, @doi [Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society] 10.3847/2515-5172/ad19de , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024RNAAS...8....5S 8, 5

  128. [136]

    A., Zurita C., Villaver E., Hernandez-Peralta H., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/590505 , 120, 848

    Shahbaz T., Watson C. A., Zurita C., Villaver E., Hernandez-Peralta H., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/590505 , 120, 848

  129. [137]

    I., Sunyaev R

    Shakura N. I., Sunyaev R. A., 1973, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973A&A....24..337S 24, 337

  130. [138]

    M., Prialnik D., Hillman Y., Kovetz A., 2018, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aabfbd , 860, 110

    Shara M. M., Prialnik D., Hillman Y., Kovetz A., 2018, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aabfbd , 860, 110

  131. [139]

    J., Bildsten L., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/586689 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...678.1530S 678, 1530

    Shen K. J., Bildsten L., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/586689 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...678.1530S 678, 1530

  132. [140]

    J., Bildsten L., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/1365 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...699.1365S 699, 1365

    Shen K. J., Bildsten L., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/1365 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...699.1365S 699, 1365

  133. [141]

    N., Sonneborn G., Starrfield S

    Shore S. N., Sonneborn G., Starrfield S. G., Hamuy M., Williams R. E., Cassatella A., Drechsel H., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1086/169804 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991ApJ...370..193S 370, 193

  134. [142]

    M., Wilson R

    Sion E. M., Wilson R. E., Godon P., Starrfield S., Williams R. E., Darnley M. J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aafb0b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...872...68S 872, 68

  135. [143]

    Stanishev V., Zamanov R., Tomov N., Marziani P., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20034623 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004A&A...415..609S 415, 609

  136. [144]

    W., Sparks W

    Starrfield S., Truran J. W., Sparks W. M., Kutter G., 1972, Astrophysical Journal, vol. 176, p. 169, 176, 169

  137. [145]

    R., 2008, in Bode M

    Starrfield S., Iliadis C., Hix W. R., 2008, in Bode M. F., Evans A., eds, , Vol. 43, Classical Novae. Cambridge University Press, pp 77--101, @doi 10.1017/CBO9780511536168.006

  138. [146]

    E., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1086/184811 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987ApJ...312L..17S 312, L17

    Stella L., Priedhorsky W., White N. E., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1086/184811 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987ApJ...312L..17S 312, L17

  139. [147]

    pp 113--156

    Strohmayer T., Bildsten L., 2006, New views of thermonuclear bursts . pp 113--156

  140. [148]

    E., Brown E

    Strohmayer T. E., Brown E. F., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/338337 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...566.1045S 566, 1045

  141. [149]

    E., Smith E

    Strohmayer T. E., Smith E. A., 2011, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ATel.3258....1S 3258, 1

  142. [150]

    E., Markwardt C

    Strohmayer T. E., Markwardt C. B., Swank J. H., in't Zand J., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/379158 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...596L..67S 596, L67

  143. [151]

    E., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aada14 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...865...63S 865, 63

    Strohmayer T. E., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aada14 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...865...63S 865, 63

  144. [152]

    J., Schaefer B

    Strope R. J., Schaefer B. E., Henden A. A., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/140/1/34 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....140...34S 140, 34

  145. [153]

    arXiv:2411.10992

    Takeda T., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2411.10992 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241110992T p. arXiv:2411.10992

  146. [154]

    D., Dhillon V

    Thoroughgood T. D., Dhillon V. S., Littlefair S. P., Marsh T. R., Smith D. A., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04828.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.327.1323T 327, 1323

  147. [155]

    Thorstensen J., Charles P., Bowyer S., 1978, @doi [ ] 10.1086/182651 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978ApJ...220L.131T 220, L131

  148. [156]

    K., Chou Y., Heger A., Hsieh H.-E., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3224 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.500...34T 500, 34

    Tse K., Galloway D. K., Chou Y., Heger A., Hsieh H.-E., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3224 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.500...34T 500, 34

  149. [157]

    K., Heger A., 2023, @doi [arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.05236] 10.48550/arXiv.2309.05236

    Tse K., Galloway D. K., Heger A., 2023, @doi [arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.05236] 10.48550/arXiv.2309.05236

  150. [158]

    Vincentelli F. M., Cavecchi Y., Casella P., Migliari S., Altamirano D., Belloni T., Diaz-Trigo M., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slaa049 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.495L..37V 495, L37

  151. [159]

    Voges W., et al., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9909315 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999A&A...349..389V 349, 389

  152. [160]

    A., Hubeny I., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/306496 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...509..350W 509, 350

    Wade R. A., Hubeny I., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/306496 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...509..350W 509, 350

  153. [161]

    J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348352 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...689A..47W 689, A47

    Wang P. J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348352 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...689A..47W 689, A47

  154. [162]

    O., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1974 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454.1371W 454, 1371

    Wijnands R., Degenaar N., Armas Padilla M., Altamirano D., Cavecchi Y., Linares M., Bahramian A., Heinke C. O., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1974 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454.1371W 454, 1371

  155. [163]

    M., Bildsten L., Brooks J., Paxton B., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/782/2/117 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...782..117W 782, 117

    Wolf W. M., Bildsten L., Brooks J., Paxton B., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/782/2/117 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...782..117W 782, 117

  156. [164]

    E., 1920, Harvard College Observatory Bulletin, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1920BHarO.733....1W 733, 1

    Woods I. E., 1920, Harvard College Observatory Bulletin, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1920BHarO.733....1W 733, 1

  157. [165]

    A., et al., 2009, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/738 , 706, 738

    Woudt P. A., et al., 2009, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/738 , 706, 738

  158. [166]

    M., Kovetz A., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/428435 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...623..398Y 623, 398

    Yaron O., Prialnik D., Shara M. M., Kovetz A., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/428435 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...623..398Y 623, 398

  159. [167]

    Zamanov R., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348372 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...680L..18Z 680, L18

  160. [168]

    Zhong J., Wang Z., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/729/1/8 , 729, 8

  161. [169]

    Y., Revnivtsev M

    Zolotukhin I. Y., Revnivtsev M. G., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17706.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.411..620Z 411, 620

  162. [170]

    in't Zand J., 2017, in Serino M., Shidatsu M., Iwakiri W., Mihara T., eds, 7 years of MAXI: monitoring X-ray Transients. p. 121 ( @eprint arXiv 1702.04899 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.1702.04899

  163. [171]

    in't Zand J. J. M., 2024, List of Galactic Type-I X-ray bursters, https://sronpersonalpages.nl/ jeanz/bursterlist.html

  164. [172]

    in't Zand J., et al., 2004, @doi [Nuclear Physics B Proceedings Supplements] 10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2004.04.083 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004NuPhS.132..486I 132, 486

  165. [173]

    in't Zand J. J. M., Cornelisse R., M \'e ndez M., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20052955 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...440..287I 440, 287

  166. [174]

    in't Zand J. J. M., Jonker P. G., Markwardt C. B., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066678 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...465..953I 465, 953

  167. [176]

    in't Zand J. J. M., Jonker P. G., Bassa C. G., Markwardt C. B., Levine A. M., 2009b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200912403 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...506..857I 506, 857

  168. [177]

    van Paradijs J., 1979, @doi [ ] 10.1086/157535 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979ApJ...234..609V 234, 609

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.