Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 69 references

Generalized boundary triples for adjoint pairs with applications to non-self-adjoint Schr\"odinger operators

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Schrödinger operators with complex potentials on Lipschitz domains have closed Robin realizations, and their resolvents obey an explicit Krein-type formula.

desk verdict The concrete Schrödinger application is the real contribution; the abstract machinery is honestly delegated to [8], and the only load-bearing gap is the sketched trace theory for unbounded domains. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.22321 v1 pith:WCLJP7CU submitted 2025-05-28 math.SP math.APmath.FA

Antonio Arnal , Jussi Behrndt , Markus Holzmann , Petr Siegl This is my paper
classification math.SPmath.APmath.FA MSC 47B2547A1035J1035P0547A55
keywords generalizedboundarytriplesadjointpairsWeylfunctionsnon-self-adjointSchrödingeroperatorsLipschitzdomainsRobinconditionsKrein-typeresolventformulacomplexpotentials
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Generalized boundary triples - a tool that encodes a boundary value problem as a pair of boundary maps and a Weyl function - were developed for symmetric operators. This paper adapts the apparatus to adjoint pairs, where the two operators are not self-adjoint but satisfy a Green-type identity. The payoff is concrete: for Schrödinger operators $-\Delta+V$ with complex $L^p$ potentials on bounded or exterior Lipschitz domains with compact boundary, the Robin realization $A_B=-\Delta+V$ with domain $\{f\in H^{3/2}_\Delta(\Omega): \tau_N f = B \tau_D f\}$ is a closed operator with a nonempty resolvent set for every bounded boundary operator $B$ on $L^2(\partial\Omega)$. The proof supplies an explicit Krein-type resolvent formula expressing $(A_B-\lambda)^{-1}$ as the Neumann resolvent plus a boundary correction, and shows the correction is compact. This matters because the complex potential destroys self-adjointness, yet the analysis still yields closed realizations and resolvent control on rough domains.

What carries the argument

The central object is the generalized boundary triple for an adjoint pair $\{S,\tilde S\}$: a Hilbert space $\mathcal G$ together with boundary mappings $\Gamma_0,\Gamma_1:\mathrm{dom}\,T\to\mathcal G$ and $\tilde\Gamma_0,\tilde\Gamma_1:\mathrm{dom}\,\tilde T\to\mathcal G$ such that the Green identity $(Tf,g)-(f,\tilde T g)=(\Gamma_1 f,\tilde\Gamma_0 g)-(\Gamma_0 f,\tilde\Gamma_1 g)$ holds, $\Gamma_0$ and $\tilde\Gamma_0$ are surjective, and $A_0=T\upharpoonright\ker\Gamma_0$, $\tilde A_0=\tilde T\upharpoonright\ker\tilde\Gamma_0$ are adjoints of each other. From it one builds $\gamma$-fields $\gamma(\lambda)=(\Gamma_0\upharpoonright\ker(T-\lambda))^{-1}$ and Weyl functions $M(\lambda)=\Gamma_1\gamma(\lambda)$, which convert the boundary condition into the boundary equation $B M(\lambda)\varphi=\varphi$. The decisive mechanism in the concrete application is the estimate $\|M(\lambda)\|\le C|\lambda|^{-1/2+\varepsilon}$ as $\lambda\to-\infty$, obtained by writing $M(\lambda)$ through fractional powers of the Neumann resolvent $(H_N-\lambda)^{-1}$ and bounded trace operators; this decay forces $I-BM(\lambda)$ to be boundedly invertible on a negative ray, which is exactly what makes the abstract criteria for closedness and the resolvent formula applicable.

What would settle it

A concrete check is to take a simple exterior Lipschitz domain (e.g., the complement of the unit ball) with $V=0$ and compute numerically the Weyl function $M(\lambda)$, the Neumann-to-Dirichlet map for $-\Delta-\lambda$. If $\|M(\lambda)\|$ does not decay along the negative real axis, or if for some bounded operator $B$ the operator $I-BM(\lambda)$ is not invertible for arbitrarily negative $\lambda$, then Corollary 3.7's claim that a full ray $(-\infty,\xi_4)$ lies in $\rho(A_B)$ would be false; the same test can be repeated with a complex $L^p$ potential satisfying Assumption 3.1.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the generalized boundary triple construction survives the passage from symmetric operators to adjoint pairs, and that the abstract machinery can be applied to a non-self-adjoint elliptic problem. For an adjoint pair $\{S,\tilde S\}$ with core $\{T,\tilde T\}$ of $\{S^*,\tilde S^*\}$, the paper defines boundary maps $\Gamma_0,\Gamma_1$ and $\tilde\Gamma_0,\tilde\Gamma_1$ into a Hilbert space $\mathcal G$ satisfying the abstract Green identity, surjectivity of $\Gamma_0,\tilde\Gamma_0$, and the adjoint relation $A_0^* = \tilde A_0$ for $A_0=T\upharpoonright\ker\Gamma_0$; it then shows the associated $\gamma$-fields and Weyl functions obey the same identities as in the symmetric case, including a Birman-Schwinger criterion and a Krein-type resolvent formula. Applied to a domain $\Omega$ with $\mathcal G=L^2(\partial\Omega)$, $\Gamma_0=\tilde\Gamma_0=\tau_N$ and $\Gamma_1=\tilde\Gamma_1=\tau_D$, this yields a generalized boundary triple for the adjoint pair $\{-\Delta+V,-\Delta+\bar V\}$ with minimal domain $H^2_0(\Omega)$. The main corollary states that for every bounded operator $B$ on $L^2(\partial\Omega)$, the Robin realization $A_B=-\Delta+V$ with $\tau_N f=B\tau_D f$ is closed, has a nonempty resolvent set, and satisfies the Krein-type resolvent formula $(A_B-\lambda)^{-1}=(A_0-\lambda)^{-1}+\gamma(\lambda)(I-BM(\lambda))^{-1}B\tilde\gamma(\lambda)^*$ for all $\lambda$ in the common resolvent set; the resolvent difference is compact, so $A_B$ is a compact perturbation of the Neumann realization $A_0$ in resolvent sense.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the Dirichlet and Neumann trace maps on Lipschitz domains have the boundedness, surjectivity, bounded right inverses, and kernel-regularity properties stated in Appendix A; for exterior domains the paper sketches rather than proves these properties, so if the imported trace theorems fail there, the central Robin realization result would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every bounded operator $B$ on $L^2(\partial\Omega)$, the Robin realization $A_B=-\Delta+V$ on a bounded or exterior Lipschitz domain with complex $L^p$ potential is closed and has a nonempty resolvent set; the same holds for the conjugate potential $\bar V$.
  • The resolvent of $A_B$ is given by $(A_B-\lambda)^{-1}=(A_0-\lambda)^{-1}+\gamma(\lambda)(I-BM(\lambda))^{-1}B\tilde\gamma(\lambda)^*$ on the common resolvent set, so spectral analysis can be carried out through boundary data.
  • An eigenvalue $\lambda$ of $A_B$ occurs exactly when $\ker(I-BM(\lambda))\neq\{0\}$, a Birman-Schwinger-type characterization that links point spectrum to a boundary operator equation.
  • The resolvent difference between $A_B$ and the Neumann realization $A_0$ is compact, so $A_B$ is a compact perturbation of $A_0$ in resolvent sense and the two operators share the same essential spectrum.
  • The abstract criteria in Theorem 2.8 give a sufficient condition for any adjoint pair: if $B$ is closable, $\mathrm{ran}(\Gamma_1\upharpoonright\ker\Gamma_0)\subset\mathrm{dom}\,B$, and $1\in\rho(BM(\lambda_0))$, then $A_B$ is closed with $\lambda_0$ in its resolvent set.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same abstract framework should apply to other non-self-adjoint elliptic operators on Lipschitz domains; one only needs an adjoint pair with a core and boundary maps satisfying Green's identity, so convection-diffusion or magnetic Schrödinger operators are natural next candidates.
  • The decay estimate $\|M(\lambda)\|\le C|\lambda|^{-1/2+\varepsilon}$ suggests a general phenomenon: Neumann-to-Dirichlet maps for elliptic operators on domains with compact boundary decay along the negative axis, which could yield resolvent estimates for non-self-adjoint Robin problems without solving the PDE.
  • A testable extension would replace the bounded boundary parameter $B$ by an unbounded differential operator on $\partial\Omega$; Theorem 2.8 already permits closable $B$ with a range condition, so the open question is whether that range condition and the invertibility of $I-BM(\lambda)$ can be verified.
  • Numerically computing the Weyl function for a simple exterior domain (for instance, the complement of the unit ball) with $V=0$ could determine whether the $|\lambda|^{-1/2}$ rate is sharp, informing eigenvalue asymptotics for complex Robin Laplacians.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a theory of generalized boundary triples for adjoint pairs of closed operators and applies it to Schrödinger operators with complex L^p potentials on bounded and exterior Lipschitz domains with compact boundary. Section 2 states the abstract framework—generalized boundary triples, γ-fields, Weyl functions, closed extensions, and Krein-type resolvent formulas—mostly quoting results from the companion preprint [8]. Section 3 constructs, for Ω as in Assumption 3.1, a generalized boundary triple for the adjoint pair {−Δ+V, −Δ+\bar V} using the Dirichlet and Neumann traces on H^{3/2}_Δ(Ω). The main concrete result, Corollary 3.7, asserts that for every bounded operator B on L^2(∂Ω) the Robin realization A_B = −Δ+V with boundary condition τ_N f = Bτ_D f is closed, has a nonempty resolvent set, and satisfies the Krein-type resolvent formula (3.27); the key new ingredient is the Weyl function decay ∥M(λ)∥ ≤ C|λ|^{-1/2+ε} established in Proposition 3.6(iv). Appendix A collects the needed trace theory for Lipschitz domains.

Significance. If the underlying trace theory is valid, the paper gives a clean and fairly general abstract framework for non-self-adjoint boundary value problems, with a concrete application to Robin Laplacians with complex potentials on Lipschitz domains, including exterior domains. The strengths are the explicit derivation of the boundary triple, the carefully factored proof of the Weyl function decay, and the absence of fitted parameters or ad hoc assumptions; the resolvent formula is derived rather than assumed. The practical significance is moderate: as the authors state, the abstract Section 2 is contained in the preprint [8], so the main novelty lies in the concrete application and in the extension to unbounded domains. That extension is precisely where the paper is thinnest, since the decisive Neumann trace theorem for exterior Lipschitz domains is not proved.

major comments (2)
  1. [Appendix A, Theorem A.2] The unbounded-domain part of Theorem A.2 is not proved: the text says that 'the same localization arguments as in the proof of Theorem A.1 can be applied to verify the statement; we leave the details to the reader.' This is load-bearing for the central claim, because Theorem 3.3 uses the surjectivity of τ_N on H^{3/2}_Δ(Ω) to verify condition (ii) of Definition 2.1, and Proposition 3.6 and Lemma 3.5 use the trace mapping properties, including the kernel regularity (A.9)–(A.10), to obtain the decay of the Weyl function that makes I−BM(λ) invertible for large negative λ. Please supply a complete proof for exterior Lipschitz domains, or a precise reference that covers exactly this statement, including the bounded right inverse and the H^{3/2} regularity of the kernel; if such a theorem is not available, the exterior-domain part of Corollary 3.7 should be removed or explicitly qualified.
  2. [Section 2 (Theorems 2.2, 2.6, 2.8; Proposition 2.4)] The abstract results on which the application rests—Theorem 2.2, used in Theorem 3.3 to verify that the trace operators form a generalized boundary triple, and Theorem 2.8, used in Corollary 3.7 to obtain closedness and the resolvent formula—are quoted from the preprint [8] rather than proved here; only Theorem 2.8 has a sketch. Since [8] is an unpublished preprint by one of the present authors, the paper is not self-contained at the load-bearing level. Please either include full proofs of these abstract statements or state them explicitly as theorems with complete proofs in the present manuscript, so that the reader can verify the chain from the trace theory to Corollary 3.7 without relying on an inaccessible preprint.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (2.1)] The sentence after (2.1) says the identity is equivalent to 'eS⊂S* or S⊂eS*'; since either inclusion is in fact equivalent to the same identity, the wording should be 'equivalent to eS⊂S* (equivalently, S⊂eS*)' to avoid the misleading impression that one inclusion is weaker.
  2. [Corollary 3.7] The step from the decay estimate in Proposition 3.6(iv) to the assertion that an entire interval (−∞,ξ_4) is contained in ρ(A_0)∩ρ(A_B) is not written out. It follows by applying Theorem 2.6 for each sufficiently negative λ once I−BM(λ) is invertible, but the reader should be told this explicitly.
  3. [Theorem A.1] The localization proof for the unbounded case states that the bounded-domain results are used for χf, but it does not explicitly construct the bounded right inverse for τ_D on H^s_Δ(Ω); a sentence indicating how a given boundary function is extended to a function supported near ∂Ω would make the argument complete.
  4. [Theorem 3.3, proof of condition (iii)] The argument from bijectivity of A_0−λ and eA_0−λ to the equalities A_0=eA_0^* and eA_0=A_0^* is compressed; since A_0⊂eA_0^* and λ is real, one may use λ∈ρ(eA_0^*) because ρ(eA_0^*)=overline{ρ(eA_0)}, but this should be stated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the main result is a conditional application of external, parameter-free operator-theoretic and trace-theoretic results, and the cited self-work is independent support rather than a redefinition of the conclusion.

full rationale

The paper contains no fitted parameters, no empirical predictions, and no object that is defined in terms of the very quantity it is supposed to determine. The abstract framework in Section 2 is explicitly delegated to the separate preprint [8] by one of the present authors, and the paper states this plainly: "our abstract treatment in Section 2 in this sense is contained in [8]." Those cited theorems are parameter-free results with stated assumptions that do not already contain the Schrödinger-operator conclusion of Corollary 3.7, so they count as real evidence rather than circular reasoning. In Section 3 the assumptions of the abstract framework are verified from Sobolev and trace theory (Theorems A.1 and A.2, Lemma A.3), Kato perturbation theory, and the resolvent representation (3.19)-(3.20); Proposition 3.6 derives the decay of the Weyl function from these ingredients, and Corollary 3.7 is a direct application of Theorem 2.8. No step uses the resolvent formula that is being proved. The genuine caveat is completeness, not circularity: the surjectivity of the Neumann trace for unbounded Lipschitz domains is only sketched in Theorem A.2, where the paper says "the same localization arguments ... can be applied ... we leave the details to the reader," and the cited sources [11,40] are primarily bounded-domain results. Thus the paper is conditional on those external theorems being correct, but that conditionality does not make the derivation circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted parameters or invented entities appear. The derivation is analytical; the central application rests on standard perturbation theory, trace theorems for Lipschitz domains, and the boundary triple framework imported from [8]. The main caveat is that [8] is an unpublished preprint and several proofs are delegated there.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Trace theorems for Lipschitz domains with compact boundary: for s∈[1/2,3/2], τ_D: H^s_Δ(Ω)→H^{s-1/2}(∂Ω) and τ_N: H^s_Δ(Ω)→H^{s-3/2}(∂Ω) are bounded and surjective, with ker τ_D, ker τ_N ⊂ H^{3/2}(Ω).
    The paper imports these from [11,40] in Appendix A; they are used to construct the boundary triple in Theorem 3.3 and to get H^{3/2} regularity. For unbounded domains the proof is sketched via localization, not fully written.
  • standard math Perturbation theorems: an operator relatively bounded with bound less than 1 is closed with nonempty resolvent set if the unperturbed operator is self-adjoint; forms perturbed with relative bound 0 define m-sectorial operators.
    Used in Theorem 3.3 and Proposition 3.4 to show A0 and eA0 are closed, m-sectorial, and to obtain resolvent representations (3.19)-(3.20).
  • domain assumption Assumption 3.1: Ω is a bounded Lipschitz domain or an unbounded Lipschitz domain with compact boundary, and V∈L^p(Ω) with p≥2n/3 if n>3, p>2 if n=2,3.
    The whole Section 3 is restricted to this class; it guarantees Vf∈L^2(Ω) for f∈H^{3/2}(Ω) and relative boundedness with bound 0.
  • standard math The generalized boundary triple framework for adjoint pairs as developed in [8] (and its predecessors [34,55,56,57]) is correct, including the properties of γ-fields and Weyl functions in Proposition 2.4 and the closedness criterion in Theorem 2.8.
    The paper relies on [8] for many core abstract statements and does not reproduce those proofs. No independent verification is included in this preprint.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Generalized boundary triples for adjoint pairs with applications to non-self-adjoint Schr\"odinger operators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WCLJP7CU

@misc{pith2026250522321,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Generalized boundary triples for adjoint pairs with applications to non-self-adjoint Schr\"odinger operators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WCLJP7CU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.22321}
}
abstract

We extend the notion of generalized boundary triples and their Weyl functions from extension theory of symmetric operators to adjoint pairs of operators, and we provide criteria on the boundary parameters to induce closed operators with a nonempty resolvent set. The abstract results are applied to Schr\"odinger operators with complex $L^p$-potentials on bounded and unbounded Lipschitz domains with compact boundaries.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [8]

    Boundary value problems for adjoint pairs of operators

    J. Behrndt, Boundary value problems for adjoint pairs of operators, arXiv:2312.08955

    work page Pith review arXiv

  2. [1]

    Almog, D.S

    Y. Almog, D.S. Grebenkov, and B. Helffer, On a Schr¨ odinger operator with a purely imaginary potential in the semiclassical limit, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 44 (2019), 1542– 1604

    work page 2019

  3. [2]

    Antoni´ c and K

    N. Antoni´ c and K. Burazin, Intrinsic boundary conditions for Friedrichs systems, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 35 (2010), 1690–1715

    work page 2010

  4. [3]

    Antoni´ c, K

    N. Antoni´ c, K. Burazin, I. Crnjac, and M. Erceg, Complex Friedrichs systems and applica- tions, J. Math. Phys. 58 (2017), 101508

    work page 2017

  5. [4]

    Antoni´ c, M

    N. Antoni´ c, M. Erceg, and A. Michelangeli, Friedrichs systems in a Hilbert space framework: solvability and multiplicity, J. Differential Equations 263 (2017), 8264–8294

    work page 2017

  6. [5]

    Arendt, A.F.M

    W. Arendt, A.F.M. ter Elst, J.B. Kennedy, and M. Sauter, The Dirichlet-to-Neumann oper- ator via hidden compactness, J. Funct. Anal. 266 (2014), 1757–1786

    work page 2014

  7. [6]

    Arlinskii, Abstract boundary conditions for maximal sectorial extensions of sectorial op- erators, Math

    Y. Arlinskii, Abstract boundary conditions for maximal sectorial extensions of sectorial op- erators, Math. Nachr. 209 (2000), 5–36

    work page 2000

  8. [7]

    Arlinskii, Boundary triplets and maximal accretive extensions of sectorial operators, in: Operator methods for boundary value problems, London Math

    Y. Arlinskii, Boundary triplets and maximal accretive extensions of sectorial operators, in: Operator methods for boundary value problems, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 404, 35–72 Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, (2012)

    work page 2012

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    Behrndt, P

    J. Behrndt, P. Exner, M. Holzmann, and V. Lotoreichik, On the spectral properties of Dirac operators with electrostaticδ-shell interactions, J. Math. Pures Appl. 111 (2018), 47–78

    2018

  2. [10]

    Behrndt, F

    J. Behrndt, F. Gesztesy, H. Holden, and R. Nichols, On the index of meromorphic operator- valued functions and some applications, in: Functional Analysis and Operator Theory for Quantum Physics - The Pavel Exner Anniversary Volume, EMS (2017), 95–127

    2017

  3. [11]

    Behrndt, F

    J. Behrndt, F. Gesztesy, and M. Mitrea, Sharp boundary trace theory and Schr¨ odinger op- erators on bounded Lipschitz domains, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 307 (2025), 1550

    2025

  4. [12]

    Behrndt, S

    J. Behrndt, S. Hassi, and H.S.V. de Snoo,Boundary Value Problems, Weyl Functions, and Differential Operators, Monographs in Mathematics, Vol. 108, Birkh¨ auser, 2020

    2020

  5. [13]

    Behrndt and M

    J. Behrndt and M. Langer, Boundary value problems for elliptic partial differential operators on bounded domains, J. Funct. Anal. 243 (2007), 536–565

    2007

  6. [14]

    Behrndt and M

    J. Behrndt and M. Langer, Elliptic operators, Dirichlet-to-Neumann maps and quasi bound- ary triples, in: Operator methods for boundary value problems, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 404, 121–160, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, (2012)

    2012

  7. [15]

    Behrndt, M

    J. Behrndt, M. Langer, V. Lotoreichik, and J. Rohleder, Spectral enclosures for non-self- adjoint extensions of symmetric operators, J. Funct. Anal. 275 (2018), 1808–1888

    2018

  8. [16]

    Behrndt, M.M

    J. Behrndt, M.M. Malamud, and H. Neidhardt, Scattering matrices and Dirichlet-to- Neumann maps. J. Funct. Anal. 273 (2017), 1970–2025

    2017

  9. [17]

    Behrndt and T

    J. Behrndt and T. Micheler, Elliptic differential operators on Lipschitz domains and abstract boundary value problems, J. Funct. Anal. 267 (2014), 3657–3709. 17

    2014

  10. [18]

    Behrndt and P

    J. Behrndt and P. Schlosser, Quasi boundary triples, self-adjoint extensions, and Robin Lapla- cians on the half-space, Oper. Theory Adv. Appl. 275 (2019), 49–66

    2019

  11. [19]

    P. K. Bhattacharyya,Distributions. Generalized Functions with Applications in Sobolev Spaces, de Gruyter Textbook, 2012

    2012

  12. [20]

    Birman, Perturbations of the continuous spectrum of a singular elliptic operator by varying the boundary and the boundary conditions, Vestnik Leningrad

    M.S. Birman, Perturbations of the continuous spectrum of a singular elliptic operator by varying the boundary and the boundary conditions, Vestnik Leningrad. Univ. 17 (1962), 22–55 (in Russian); translated in: Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. 225 (2008), 19–53

    1962

  13. [21]

    B¨ ogli, J.B

    S. B¨ ogli, J.B. Kennedy, and R. Lang, On the eigenvalues of the Robin Laplacian with a complex parameter, Anal. Math. Phys. 12 (2022), 39

    2022

  14. [22]

    Borisov and D

    D. Borisov and D. Krejˇ ciˇ r ´ ık, PT-symmetric waveguides, Integral Equations Operator Theory 62 (2008), 489-515

    2008

  15. [23]

    Borisov and D

    D. Borisov and D. Krejˇ ciˇ r ´ ık, The effective Hamiltonian for thin layers with non-Hermitian Robin-type boundary conditions, Asymptot. Anal. 76 (2012), 49-59

    2012

  16. [24]

    Brown, G

    B.M. Brown, G. Grubb, and I.G. Wood,M-functions for closed extensions of adjoint pairs of operators with applications to elliptic boundary problems, Math. Nachr. 282 (2009), 314–347

    2009

  17. [25]

    Brown, J

    B.M. Brown, J. Hinchcliffe, M. Marletta, S. Naboko, and I. Wood, The abstract Titchmarsh– WeylM-function for adjoint operator pairs and its relation to the spectrum, Integral Equa- tions Operator Theory 63 (2009), 297–320

    2009

  18. [26]

    Brown, M

    B.M. Brown, M. Marletta, S. Naboko, and I.G. Wood, Boundary triplets andM-functions for non-selfadjoint operators, with applications to elliptic PDEs and block operator matrices, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 77 (2008), 700–718

    2008

  19. [27]

    Cossetti and D

    L. Cossetti and D. Krejˇ ciˇ r ´ ık, Absence of eigenvalues of non-self-adjoint Robin Laplacians on the half-space, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 121 (2020), 584–616

    2020

  20. [28]

    Derkach, S

    V.A. Derkach, S. Hassi, and M.M. Malamud, Generalized boundary triples, I. Some classes of isometric and unitary boundary pairs and realization problems for subclasses of Nevanlinna functions, Math. Nachr. 293 (2020), 1278–1327

    2020

  21. [29]

    Derkach, S

    V.A. Derkach, S. Hassi, and M.M. Malamud, Generalized boundary triples, II. Some applica- tions of generalized boundary triples and form domain invariant Nevanlinna functions, Math. Nachr. 295 (2022), 1113–1162

    2022

  22. [30]

    Derkach, S

    V.A. Derkach, S. Hassi, M.M. Malamud, and H. de Snoo, Generalized resolvents of symmetric operators and admissibility, Methods Funct. Anal. Topology 6 (2000), 24–55

    2000

  23. [31]

    Derkach, S

    V.A. Derkach, S. Hassi, M.M. Malamud, and H. de Snoo, Boundary relations and their Weyl families. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 358 (2006), 5351–5400

    2006

  24. [32]

    Derkach, S

    V.A. Derkach, S. Hassi, M.M. Malamud, and H. de Snoo, Boundary relations and generalized resolvents of symmetric operators. Russian J. Math. Phys. 16 (2009), 17–60

    2009

  25. [33]

    Derkach, S

    V.A. Derkach, S. Hassi, M.M. Malamud, and H. de Snoo, Boundary triplets and Weyl func- tions. Recent developments, in: Operator methods for boundary value problems, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 404, 161–220, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, (2012)

    2012

  26. [34]

    Derkach and M.M

    V.A. Derkach and M.M. Malamud, The extension theory of Hermitian operators and the moment problem, J. Math. Sci. 73 (1995), 141–242

    1995

  27. [35]

    Edmunds and W.D

    D.E. Edmunds and W.D. Evans,Spectral Theory and Differential Operators, Oxford Univer- sity Press, 1987

    1987

  28. [36]

    Ern, J.-L

    A. Ern, J.-L. Guermond, and G. Caplain, An intrinsic criterion for the bijectivity of Hilbert operators related to Friedrichs’ systems, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 32 (2007), 317–341

    2007

  29. [37]

    Gesztesy and M

    F. Gesztesy and M. Mitrea, Generalized Robin boundary conditions, Robin-to-Dirichlet maps, and Krein-type resolvent formulas for Schr¨ odinger operators on bounded Lipschitz domains, in: Perspectives in partial differential equations, harmonic analysis and applications. Proc. ...

    2008

  30. [38]

    Gesztesy and M

    F. Gesztesy and M. Mitrea, Robin-to-Robin maps and Krein-type resolvent formulas for Schr¨ odinger operators on bounded Lipschitz domains, Oper. Theory Adv. Appl. 191 (2009), 81–113

    2009

  31. [39]

    Gesztesy and M

    F. Gesztesy and M. Mitrea, Nonlocal Robin Laplacians and some remarks on a paper by Filonov on eigenvalue inequalities, J. Differential Equations 247 (2009), 2871–2896

    2009

  32. [40]

    Gesztesy and M

    F. Gesztesy and M. Mitrea, A description of all self-adjoint extensions of the Laplacian and Krein-type resolvent formulas on non-smooth domains, J. Anal. Math. 113 (2011), 53–172

    2011

  33. [41]

    Grubb, A characterization of the non-local boundary value problems associated with an elliptic operator, Ann

    G. Grubb, A characterization of the non-local boundary value problems associated with an elliptic operator, Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa 22 (1968), 425–513

    1968

  34. [42]

    Grubb, Krein resolvent formulas for elliptic boundary problems in nonsmooth domains, Rend

    G. Grubb, Krein resolvent formulas for elliptic boundary problems in nonsmooth domains, Rend. Semin. Mat. Univ. Politec. Torino 66 (2008), 271–297

    2008

  35. [43]

    Hassi, M

    S. Hassi, M. M. Malamud, and V. I. Mogilevskii, Generalized resolvents and boundary triplets for dual pairs of linear relations. Methods Funct. Anal. Topology 11 (2005), 170–187. 18 ANTONIO ARNAL, JUSSI BEHRNDT, MARKUS HOLZMANN *, AND PETR SIEGL

    2005

  36. [44]

    Hassi, M

    S. Hassi, M. M. Malamud, and V. I. Mogilevskii, Unitary equivalence of proper extensions of a symmetric operator and the Weyl function, Integral Equations Operator Theory 77 (2013), 449–487

    2013

  37. [45]

    Jerison and C

    D. Jerison and C. Kenig, The Neumann problem in Lipschitz domains, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 4 (1981), 203–207

    1981

  38. [46]

    Jerison and C

    D. Jerison and C. Kenig, The inhomogeneous Dirichlet problem in Lipschitz domains, J. Funct. Anal. 113 (1995), 161–219

    1995

  39. [47]

    Kato,Perturbation theory for linear operators, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995 (Reprint of the 1980 edition)

    T. Kato,Perturbation theory for linear operators, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995 (Reprint of the 1980 edition)

    1995

  40. [48]

    Krejˇ ciˇ r ´ ık, N

    D. Krejˇ ciˇ r ´ ık, N. Raymond, J. Royer, and P. Siegl, Reduction of dimension as a consequence of norm-resolvent convergence and applications, Mathematika 64 (2018), 406–429

    2018

  41. [49]

    Langer and B

    H. Langer and B. Textorius, On generalized resolvents andQ-functions of symmetric linear relations (subspaces) in Hilbert space, Pacific J. Math. 72 (1977), 135–165

    1977

  42. [50]

    Latushkin and S

    Y. Latushkin and S. Sukhtaiev, Resolvent expansions for self-adjoint operators via boundary triplets, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 54 (2022), 2469–2491

    2022

  43. [51]

    Latushkin and S

    Y. Latushkin and S. Sukhtaiev, First-order asymptotic perturbation theory for extensions of symmetric operators, J. London Math. Soc. 110 (2024), e13005

    2024

  44. [52]

    Lions and E

    J. Lions and E. Magenes,Non-Homogeneous Boundary Value Problems and Applications I, Springer, 1972

    1972

  45. [53]

    Lyantse and O.G

    V.E. Lyantse and O.G. Storozh,Methods of the Theory of Unbounded Operators, Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1983

    1983

  46. [54]

    Malamud, Spectral theory of elliptic operators in exterior domains, Russ

    M.M. Malamud, Spectral theory of elliptic operators in exterior domains, Russ. J. Math. Phys. 17 (2010), 96–125

    2010

  47. [55]

    Malamud and V.I

    M.M. Malamud and V.I. Mogilevskii, On extensions of dual pairs of operators, Dopov. Nats. Akad. Nauk Ukr. Mat. Prirodozn. Tekh. Nauki (1997), 30–37

    1997

  48. [56]

    Malamud and V.I

    M.M. Malamud and V.I. Mogilevskii, On Weyl functions andQ-functions of dual pairs of linear relations, Dopov. Nats. Akad. Nauk Ukr. Mat. Prirodozn. Tekh. Nauki (1999), 32–37

    1999

  49. [57]

    Malamud and V.I

    M.M. Malamud and V.I. Mogilevskii, Krein type formula for canonical resolvents of dual pairs of linear relations, Methods Funct. Anal. Topology 8 (2002), 72–100

    2002

  50. [58]

    Mantile, A

    A. Mantile, A. Posilicano, and M. Sini, Self-adjoint elliptic operators with boundary condi- tions on not closed hypersurfaces, J. Differential Equations 261 (2016), 1–55

    2016

  51. [59]

    McLean,Strongly Elliptic Systems and Boundary Integral Equations, Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 2000

    W. McLean,Strongly Elliptic Systems and Boundary Integral Equations, Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 2000

    2000

  52. [60]

    Mogilevskii, Boundary triplets and Krein type resolvent formula for symmetric operators with unequal defect numbers, Methods Funct

    V.I. Mogilevskii, Boundary triplets and Krein type resolvent formula for symmetric operators with unequal defect numbers, Methods Funct. Anal. Topology 12 (2006), 258–280

    2006

  53. [61]

    Pankrashkin and N

    K. Pankrashkin and N. Popoff, An effective Hamiltonian for the eigenvalue asymptotics of the Robin Laplacian with a large parameter, J. Math. Pures. Appl. 106 (2016), 615–650

    2016

  54. [62]

    Posilicano, Boundary triples and Weyl functions for singular perturbations of self-adjoint operators, Methods Funct

    A. Posilicano, Boundary triples and Weyl functions for singular perturbations of self-adjoint operators, Methods Funct. Anal. Topology 10 (2004), 57–63

    2004

  55. [63]

    Posilicano, Self-adjoint extensions of restrictions, Operators and Matrices 2 (2008), 1–24

    A. Posilicano, Self-adjoint extensions of restrictions, Operators and Matrices 2 (2008), 1–24

    2008

  56. [64]

    Post, First-order operators and boundary triples, Russ

    O. Post, First-order operators and boundary triples, Russ. J. Math. Phys. 14 (2007), 482–492

    2007

  57. [65]

    Post, Boundary pairs associated with quadratic forms, Math

    O. Post, Boundary pairs associated with quadratic forms, Math. Nachr. 289 (2016), 1052– 1099

    2016

  58. [66]

    Vainerman, On extensions of closed operators in Hilbert space, Math

    L.I. Vainerman, On extensions of closed operators in Hilbert space, Math. Notes 28 (1980), 871–875

    1980

  59. [67]

    Vishik, On general boundary problems for elliptic differential operators, Trudy Moskov

    M.I. Vishik, On general boundary problems for elliptic differential operators, Trudy Moskov. Mat. Obsc. 1 (1952), 187–246 (in Russian); translated in: Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. 24 (1963), 107–172

    1952

  60. [68]

    Wegner, Boundary triplets for skew-symmetric operators and the generation of strongly continuous semigroups, Anal

    S.A. Wegner, Boundary triplets for skew-symmetric operators and the generation of strongly continuous semigroups, Anal. Math. 43 (2017), 657–686

    2017

  61. [69]

    Wietsma, Block representations for classes of isometric operators between Krein spaces, Oper

    R. Wietsma, Block representations for classes of isometric operators between Krein spaces, Oper. Matrices 7 (2013), 651–685. Institut f¨ur Angewandte Mathematik, Technische Universit¨at Graz, Steyrergasse 30, A-8010 Graz, Austria Email address:aarnalperez01@qub.ac.uk,behrndt@t...

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.