New chaos decomposition of Gaussian nodal volumes

Anna Paola Todino; Michele Stecconi

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

New chaos decomposition of Gaussian nodal volumes

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The nodal volume of any sufficiently regular Gaussian field on a compact Riemannian manifold has an explicit Wiener–Itô chaos decomposition.

desk verdict A genuinely new chaos expansion for nodal volumes with a wrong constant in the printed main theorem; correction needed before use. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.22350 v2 pith:SA2XDJ66 submitted 2025-05-28 math.PR math.DG

Michele Stecconi , Anna Paola Todino This is my paper

classification math.PRmath.DG MSC 60G6060H07

keywords GaussiannodalvolumeWiener–ItôchaosexpansionHermitepolynomialsAdler–TaylormetricRiemannianrandomwavessecond-chaoscancellationvarianceboundssets

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that the volume of the zero set of a smooth Gaussian field on any compact Riemannian manifold (with or without boundary) splits into Wiener–Itô chaos components through an explicit formula, with no assumption that the field is isotropic or otherwise tied to the manifold's geometry. The formula expresses the nodal volume density as a sum of products of two Hermite polynomials—one in the field value, one in the normalized directional derivative—integrated over tangent directions and weighted by the field's own metric. The payoff is computational: the variance of any chaos component becomes an expectation of a product of just four Hermite polynomials in any dimension, replacing the standard expansion's products of $2+2n$ Hermite polynomials. From this the paper obtains an exact variance formula, variance bounds, and a quantitative version of the cancellation of the second chaos, now extended from symmetric settings to all compact manifolds.

What carries the argument

The key object is a new chaos expansion of the chi variable $\|\xi\|$, the length of a standard Gaussian vector $\xi\in\mathbb R^n$, written as an integral over the unit sphere: $\|\xi\|=\sum_{b}A(n,2b)\int_{S^{n-1}}H_{2b}(\langle \xi,v\rangle)\,dv$, with $A(n,2b)=\pi c_\chi(2b)/s_n$. Multiplying this by the classical expansion of the Dirac delta gives the nodal density $\delta_0(f(x))\|\nabla f(x)\|$ as a sum of products $H_{2a}(f(x))H_{2b}(\langle d_xf,u\rangle/\|u\|_{g_f})$, integrated over the tangent-unit sphere with weight $\|u\|_{g_f}$. The variance computation then uses a diagram formula for four Hermite polynomials under the condition $C_{12}=C_{34}=0$, which holds exactly because $f(x)$ and $d_x f$ are independent at each point; this is what reduces the problem to four Hermite factors.

What would settle it

For a concrete non-isotropic field, such as the unit-variance normalization of a Riemannian random wave on a flat torus with two spectral intervals, compute the second chaos component by Monte-Carlo projection of the nodal volume and compare it with both the $q=2$ case of Theorem 1.2 and the formula in Corollary 1.3; because the two displayed formulas differ by a factor of $2$, this numerical check would identify the correct normalization.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is Theorem 1.2: for a $C^2$ Gaussian field $f$ on a compact Riemannian manifold $(M,g)$ of dimension $n$ with unit variance and non-degenerate differential at every point, the $q$-th chaos component of the nodal volume measure $L_f$ vanishes for odd $q$, and for even $q$ it is the measure $$L_f(dx)[q]=\sum_{\substack{a,b\in\mathbb N\\ a+b=q/2}}\frac{2\Theta(a,b)}{s_n}\int_{S(T_xM)}H_{2a}(f(x))H_{2b}\!\left(\frac{\langle d_xf,u\rangle}{\|u\|_{g_f}}\right)\|u\|_{g_f}\,du\,dx,$$ where $\Theta(a,b)=(-1)^{a+b-1}/(2^{a+b}(2b-1)a!b!)$, $s_n$ is the volume of the unit $n$-sphere, and $\|u\|_{g_f}^2=\mathbb E\{|d_x f(u)|^2\}$ is the norm of the field's associated metric. The proof multiplies the chaos expansion of $\delta_0(f(x))$ by a new spherical-integral expansion of the chi variable $\|d_x f\|$, separating the field value from its gradient without choosing an orthonormal basis. As a direct corollary, the second chaos is an explicit quadratic form in $f$ and the normalized gradient, and the variance of each component is a double integral over $M\times M$ of expectations of four Hermite polynomials depending only on the full covariance of the first jet.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the field having unit variance and a non-degenerate differential at every point; if the derivative degenerates on a positive-measure region, the value and gradient are no longer independent and the product expansion, as well as the four-Hermite variance formula, breaks down.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The variance of every even chaos component $L_f(M)[q]$ can be written as an explicit integral involving only $C(x,y)$, the first-jet covariances, and the second mixed derivative $C''_{x,y}(u,v)$; no summation over multi-indices of length $n$ is required.
The variance upper bound $|\mathbb E\{L_f(dx)[q]L_f(dy)[q]\}|\le 2^q(\lambda(f,x)\lambda(f,y)/n)\|j''_{x,y}C\|^q_{g_f}dxdy$ gives ready-made control of every chaos component in terms of the field-adapted norm of the jet covariance.
For a homothetic field satisfying an eigenvalue equation, the second chaos has the simple form $-\lambda s_{n-1}/(2s_n\sqrt n)(\|f\|^2_{L^2}-\|\lambda^{-1}\nabla f\|^2_{L^2})$, which vanishes for zero-boundary or Neumann eigenfunctions, recovering the second-chaos cancellation.
For weakly monochromatic Riemannian random waves on arbitrary manifolds, the second-chaos variance is bounded by $c_n\ell^{1-n}\eta_\ell(O(\eta_\ell^2/\ell^2)+\varepsilon(\phi_\ell))$, giving a quantitative form of the cancellation beyond the sphere and the flat torus.
The same spherical-integral mechanism extends the chaotic decomposition to non-zero levels $f^{-1}(t)$ and to integrals over the nodal set whose angular dependence is a cosine transform, i.e., to certain random varifold functionals.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the four-Hermite reduction proves stable under small eccentricity, it should make quantitative central limit theorems for nodal volumes of non-isotropic random waves accessible, since the fourth-chaos bound would control the total variance.
The frequency and eccentricity parameters are defined directly from the covariance function, so they could be estimated in simulations or from spectral data; measuring them for a given manifold would predict whether the homothetic approximation is accurate.
The varifold extension to cosine-transform integrands suggests a concrete numerical test: for a non-isotropic field, compute the chaos components of the nodal intersection with a fixed hypersurface and compare them with the formula that depends only on first-jet covariances.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Read it. The core result is good and likely correct after a constant fix. The genuinely new thing is a Wiener-Itô chaos decomposition for nodal volume measures that does not require the field to be homothetic, and it reduces variance computations to expectations of four Hermite polynomials in any dimension. That is a real step beyond the homothetic-only expansions in [19,55], and the quantitative Berry cancellation on general manifolds is a worthwhile payoff. The derivation is self-contained: the circle-average identity is not new, but the systematic use for non-homothetic fields on manifolds with boundary is. No fitted parameters, no circularity; the self-citations are background.

Now the soft spots. As printed, Theorem 1.2 has a factor 2 in front of Θ(a,b)/s_n that the proof does not support. The product of the delta coefficient (−1)^a/(2^a a!√(2π)) and A(n,2b) = (π/s_n)cχ(2b) gives Θ(a,b)/s_n exactly, not 2Θ(a,b)/s_n. Corollary 1.3 confirms this: its q=0 case gives E[L] = (1/s_n)∫∫∥u∥ du dx. So the theorem statement is false as written, and anything relying directly on it—notably Corollary 2.1—inherits the wrong constant. Corollary 2.1 also appears to drop the square of the prefactor from Prop. 1.15 when writing Var(Lϕ[2]/λ). These are calculation errors, not structural ones; the four-Hermite variance formula, the covariance bound, and the eccentricity/frequency framework should all survive a correction. The sphere-measure convention between normalized and unnormalized forms needs a careful pass.

The non-degenerate first-jet assumption (1.10) is essential: it gives the independence used in the product delta expansion and in the diagram formula. That is a genuine limitation, but it is standard and the paper states it clearly.

Bottom line: the paper deserves a serious referee. Send it out, but the referee should insist the constants be fixed and the main theorem restated with the corrected coefficient. I would cite the corrected version.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper claims an explicit Wiener-Itô chaos decomposition for the nodal volume measure of a C^2, unit-variance Gaussian random field with non-degenerate first jet on a compact Riemannian manifold, possibly with boundary. The main formula, Theorem 1.2, expresses the q-th chaos component as a finite sum of integrals over the unit tangent sphere of products of Hermite polynomials in f(x) and in the normalized derivative, with the Adler-Taylor metric appearing through the factor ||u||_{g_f}. The authors use this representation to reduce variance computations to expectations of products of four Hermite polynomials (Theorem 4.1), to give an exact variance formula (Corollary 4.2), to derive covariance bounds (Theorem 1.10), and to quantify Berry's cancellation for Riemannian random waves (Corollaries 2.1 and 2.2). The derivation is self-contained and uses standard delta and chi-variable expansions together with the diagram formula.

Significance. If the printed constants are corrected, the paper gives a substantial and plausible advance: it provides a coordinate-free chaos expansion valid beyond homothetic fields, reduces the complexity of nodal-volume variance computations in any dimension, and introduces the frequency and eccentricity parameters as deterministic, non-fitted functionals of the field. The structural claim, namely that the nodal volume measure admits the displayed chaos decomposition with a four-Hermite variance formula, is well supported by the proof. The paper also contains no free parameters and the main formulas are falsifiable against known cases such as spheres and Berry's field. However, as printed, several quantitative statements are wrong by constant factors, so the manuscript cannot be accepted without correction.

major comments (3)

[Theorem 1.2, Eq. (1.15); §3.3; Corollary 1.3; Corollary 3.8; Definition 3.9] The coefficient in the central formula (1.15) is wrong by a factor of 2. The computation in §3.3, Eq. (3.15), gives \tilde Θ(n,a,b) = Θ(a,b)/s_n, and Corollary 1.3, Eqs. (1.17)-(1.18), Definition 3.9, Eq. (3.28), and Proposition 1.15, Eq. (1.44), all use the corrected constant without the factor 2. The erroneous factor 2 is repeated in Corollary 3.8, Eqs. (3.23)-(3.26), and in Definition 3.9, Eq. (3.29). Because this constant enters every quantitative output of the paper—expectation, variance, and bounds—the theorem statement must be corrected and the corrected constant must be propagated through all dependent formulas.
[Corollary 2.1, Eq. (2.3); Proposition 1.15, Eq. (1.44)] The variance formula in Corollary 2.1 drops the square of the prefactor from Proposition 1.15. Using the corrected constant, for a random wave with orthonormal eigenfunctions and σ^2 = #{λ_i ∈ I}, one obtains \tilde L_ϕ[2]/λ = - s_{n-1}/(2 s_n √n σ^2 λ^2) ∑ γ_i^2(λ^2 - λ_i^2), whose variance is s_{n-1}^2/(2 s_n^2 n σ^4 λ^4) ∑(λ_i^2 - λ^2)^2. The printed Eq. (2.3) instead has s_{n-1}/(2 s_n √n σ^4 λ^4) ∑(λ_i^2 - λ^2)^2, missing the factor s_{n-1}/(s_n √n). The qualitative statement about vanishing of the second chaos is unaffected, but the quantitative constant in Berry's cancellation is wrong.
[Section 5.1, Eq. (5.6), Lemma 5.2] The displayed identity in Eq. (5.6) is false. For q=4, the left-hand side q!(Σ|Θ(a,b)|)^2 equals 25/6, while the right-hand side 2^{-q} binom(q,q/2) (Σ binom(a+b,b)|2b-1|)^2 equals 27/2. Since the proof of Lemma 5.2 needs only an upper bound, the argument can likely be repaired by replacing this identity with a valid estimate, and the lemma itself appears true; however, as printed the proof of this lemma is not correct.

minor comments (4)

[Appendix C.2, Lemma C.2] The statement of c_χ(2b) has the denominator (b−1)b!, which contradicts Theorem 3.4 and the derivation in Eq. (C.6); the correct denominator appears to be (2b−1)b!.
[§3.3, proof of Theorem 1.2] The proof multiplies the distribution-valued expansion of δ_0(f(x)) with the L^2 expansion of ||∇f(x)||; since the δ_0 expansion is not an L^2 expansion, a short regularization or approximation argument would make the product step fully rigorous.
[Eq. (1.27) and Section D] The notation H_{n-1}(dv) for the spherical Hausdorff measure is confusing because H_q is also used for Hermite polynomials; using Vol_{n-1}(dv) or dσ(v) would avoid ambiguity.
[Throughout Section 1.4] The definitions of \tilde L_ϕ(M){q} in Eq. (1.39) include the factor 2, while Proposition 1.15 is computed without it; the constant audit requested above should also resolve this inconsistency.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the chaos decomposition is derived from standard delta and chi expansions and explicit covariance computations; frequency and eccentricity are defined functionals, not fitted parameters.

full rationale

The central formula Theorem 1.2 is derived in Section 3.3 by multiplying the delta expansion (3.11) with the chi expansion of Theorem 3.4, whose coefficient A(n,2b)=π/s_n c_chi(2b) is computed explicitly in (3.7) and Appendix C.2. The resulting product coefficient in (3.15) is Θ(a,b)/s_n; the printed factor 2 in (1.15) is therefore a correctness typo contradicted by Corollary 1.3, not an input-output tautology. The variance formula Corollary 4.2 follows from the diagram formula Lemma 4.1 with C12=C34=0, which is a consequence of Condition (1.10) (independence of f(x) and d_x f), not of assuming the theorem's conclusion. The parameters σ, λ, ε in Definition 1.11 are explicit deterministic functionals of the covariance of ϕ, and Theorem 1.13's O(ε) bound is proven through the polynomial P and Lemma 5.7 rather than by fitting. Self-citations to [37], [66], [68], and [55] supply background material (finiteness of moments, non-degenerate first jets, homothetic terminology, Laguerre comparison) and are not used to import the nodal-volume chaos expansion itself. Thus there is no load-bearing circularity; the factor-2 discrepancy is a mathematical error, but not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No physical entities are invented; the only new objects are the frequency endomorphism and the parameters lambda, epsilon, sigma, which are deterministic functionals of the field, not free parameters or ad hoc postulates.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The Gaussian field has unit variance and non-degenerate first jet at every point (Condition 1.10).
Used in Theorem 1.2, Lemma 3.5, and the diagram formula to ensure f(x) and grad f(x) are independent and the nodal measure is a.s. well defined.
standard math The coarea formula applies to C^2 functions on compact Riemannian manifolds with boundary.
Underlies the expression L_f(dx)=delta_0(f)||grad f||dx used in Theorem 1.2 and Corollary 3.10.
standard math Compactness of M and C^2 regularity of f ensure finiteness of second moment of L_f(M), from [37, Thm 1.5].
Needed so that the chaos decomposition (1.13) converges in L2 and the variance is finite.
standard math Diagram formula for Hermite expectations (Lemma 4.1) is assumed as a standard tool.
Used to prove the exact variance formula in Corollary 4.2.
domain assumption The series in the chaos expansion can be integrated term-by-term over the compact sphere S(TxM).
Theorem 3.4 exchanges the L2 series for |gamma| with the integral over the sphere; the paper asserts this without a detailed dominated-convergence argument.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of New chaos decomposition of Gaussian nodal volumes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SA2XDJ66

@misc{pith2026250522350,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: New chaos decomposition of Gaussian nodal volumes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SA2XDJ66}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.22350}
}

abstract

We investigate the random variable defined by the volume of the zero set of a smooth Gaussian field, on a general Riemannian manifold possibly with boundary, a fundamental object in probability and geometry. We prove a new explicit formula for its Wiener-It\^o chaos decomposition that is notably simpler than existing alternatives and which holds in greater generality, without requiring the field to be compatible with the geometry of the manifold. A key advantage of our formulation is a significant reduction in the complexity of computing the variance of the nodal volume. Unlike the standard Hermite expansion, which requires evaluating the expectation of products of $2+2n$ Hermite polynomials, our approach reduces this task--in any dimension $n$--to computing the expectation of a product of just four Hermite polynomials. As a consequence, we establish a new exact formula for the variance, together with lower and upper bounds. Importantly, in contrast to previous results, our approach applies to highly non-isotropic situations, allowing the study of Riemannian random waves on arbitrary manifolds. By introducing two parameters associated to any Gaussian field: the frequency and the eccentricity, we quantify the deviation from the standard settings (e.g., spheres) and establish a quantitative version of Berry's cancellation phenomenon valid on all manifolds.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Statistics on Yau's conjecture: Variance asymptotics
math.PR 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

On manifolds without conjugate points the monochromatic nodal-volume variance of Riemannian random waves is O(ℓ^{1-n}/log ℓ), improving Canzani–Hanin by more than a square and establishing Berry cancellation.
Level area of spin random fields: a chaos decomposition
math.PR 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

The paper claims explicit chaos formulas for the level area of spin-s Gaussian fields on SO(3), but internal consistency checks indicate a factor-2 normalization error and the headline high-frequency variance claim is...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[2]

Ancona, L

M. Ancona, L. Gass, T. Letendre, and M. Stecconi. Zeros and critical points of Gaussian fields: Cumulants asymptotics and limit theorems.arXiv:2501.10226, 2025. (Cited on p.14)

arXiv 2025
[1]

R. J. Adler and J. E. Taylor.Random fields and geometry. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, New York, 2007. (Cited on p.3, 5)

2007
[3]

Ancona and T

M. Ancona and T. Letendre. Roots of Kostlan polynomials: moments, strong Law of Large Numbers and Central Limit Theorem.Annales Henri Lebesgue, 4:1659–1703, 2021. (Cited on p.5, 15)

2021
[4]

Ancona and T

M. Ancona and T. Letendre. Zeros of smooth stationary Gaussian processes.Electron. J. Probab., 26:Paper No. 68, 81, 2021. (Cited on p.15)

2021
[5]

Ancona and T

M. Ancona and T. Letendre. Multijet bundles and application to the finiteness of moments for zeros of Gaussian fields.To appear in Analysis & PDE, 2025+. (Cited on p.4, 15)

2025
[6]

Angst and G

J. Angst and G. Poly. On the absolute continuity of random nodal volumes.The Annals of Probability, 48(5):2145–2175, 2020. (Cited on p.4, 15)

2020
[7]

Armentano, J

D. Armentano, J. M. Azaïs, F. Dalmao, J. R. León, and E. Mordecki. On the finiteness of the moments of the measure of level sets of random fields.Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics, 37(1):219 – 245, 2023. (Cited on p.15)

2023
[8]

Azais and M

J.-M. Azais and M. Wschebor.Level sets and extrema of random processes and fields. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 2009. (Cited on p.3)

2009

Show all 87 references

[9]

Beffara and D

V. Beffara and D. Gayet. Percolation of random nodal lines.Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci., 126:131– 176, 2017. (Cited on p.5)

2017
[10]

Benatar and R

J. Benatar and R. W. Maffucci. Random waves onT3: nodal area variance and lattice point correlations. International Mathematics Research Notices, 10:3032–3075, 2019. (Cited on p.5, 15) NEW CHAOS DECOMPOSITION FOR GAUSSIAN NODAL VOLUMES 36

2019
[11]

Benatar, D

J. Benatar, D. Marinucci, and I. Wigman. Planck-scale distribution of nodal length of arithmetic random waves.J. Anal. Math., 141(2):707–749, 2020. (Cited on p.5, 15)

2020
[12]

P. Berard. Volume des ensembles nodaux des fonctions propres du Laplacien.BonySjostrand-Meyer sem- inar, 1984-1985, Exp. No 14, 10 pp., Ecole Polytech. Palaiseau., 1985. (Cited on p.14)

1984
[13]

M. V. Berry. Regular and irregular semiclassical wavefunctions.J. Phys. A, 10(12):2083–2091, 1977. (Cited on p.14, 15)

1977
[14]

M. V. Berry. Statistics of nodal lines and points in chaotic quantum billiards: perimeter corrections, fluctuations, curvature.J. Phys. A, 35(13):3025–3038, 2002. (Cited on p.5, 15)

2002
[15]

Biermé and A

H. Biermé and A. Desolneux. The anisotropy of 2D or 3D Gaussian random fields through their Lipschitz- Killing curvature densities. working paper or preprint, Oct. 2024. (Cited on p.18)

2024
[16]

Billingsley.Convergence of probability measures

P. Billingsley.Convergence of probability measures. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics: Probability and Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, second edition, 1999. A Wiley-Interscience Publication. (Cited on p.2)

1999
[17]

Bogachev.Gaussian Measures

V. Bogachev.Gaussian Measures. Mathematical surveys and monographs. American Mathematical Soci- ety, 1998. (Cited on p.2, 3)

1998
[18]

Breiding, P

P. Breiding, P. Bürgisser, A. Lerario, and L. Mathis. The zonoid algebra, generalized mixed volumes, and random determinants.Advances in Mathematics, 402:108361, 2022. (Cited on p.11, 20, 21)

2022
[19]

Cammarota

V. Cammarota. Nodal area distribution for arithmetic random waves.Transactions of the American Math- ematical Society, 2017. (Cited on p.5, 6, 7, 15, 17, 34)

2017
[20]

Y. Canzani. Monochromatic random waves for general Riemannian manifolds. InFrontiers in analysis and probability—in the spirit of the Strasbourg-Zürich meetings, pages 1–20. Springer, Cham, [2020]©2020. (Cited on p.12, 14)

2020
[21]

Canzani and B

Y. Canzani and B. Hanin. Local universality for zeros and critical points of monochromatic random waves. Communications In Mathematical Physics, 378(3):1677–1712, Sept. 2020. Publisher Copyright:©2020, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. (Cited on p.5, 12, 13, 14)

2020
[22]

Canzani and P

Y. Canzani and P. Sarnak. Topology and nesting of the zero set components of monochromatic random waves.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 72(2):343–374, 2019. (Cited on p.12)

2019
[23]

Caramellino, G

L. Caramellino, G. Giorgio, and M. Rossi. Convergence in total variation for nonlinear functionals of random hyperspherical harmonics.Journal of Functional Analysis, 286(3):110239, 2024. (Cited on p.7, 21)

2024
[24]

F. Dalmao. A note on 3d-monochromatic random waves and cancellation.ALEA, Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat, 20:1091–1109, 2023. (Cited on p.15)

2023
[25]

Dalmao, A

F. Dalmao, A. Estrade, and J. León. On 3-dimensional Berry’s model.Latin American Journal of Proba- bility and Mathematical Statistics, 18:377, 01 2021. (Cited on p.5, 15)

2021
[26]

N. V. Dang and G. Rivière. Equidistribution of the conormal cycle of random nodal sets.Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 2018. (Cited on p.15)

2018
[27]

Dierickx, I

G. Dierickx, I. Nourdin, G. Peccati, and M. Rossi. Small scale clts for the nodal length of monochromatic waves.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 397:1–36, 2023. (Cited on p.14)

2023
[28]

Duminil-Copin, A

H. Duminil-Copin, A. Rivera, P.-F. Rodriguez, and H. Vanneuville. Existence of an unbounded nodal hypersurface for smooth Gaussian fields in dimensiond≥3.The Annals of Probability, 51(1):228 – 276,
[29]

R. D. Dutton and R. C. Brigham. Computationally efficient bounds for the Catalan numbers.European Journal of Combinatorics, 7(3):211–213, 1986. (Cited on p.23)

1986
[30]

Edelman and E

A. Edelman and E. Kostlan. How many zeros of a random polynomial are real?Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.), 32(1):1–37, 1995. (Cited on p.5)

1995
[31]

Federer.Geometric Measure Theory

H. Federer.Geometric Measure Theory. Classics in Mathematics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. (Cited on p.6)

2014
[32]

Y.V.Fyodorov, A.Lerario, andE.Lundberg.Onthenumberofconnectedcomponentsofrandomalgebraic hypersurfaces.J. Geom. Phys., 95:1–20, 2015. (Cited on p.5)

2015
[33]

L. Gass. Almost-sure asymptotics for Riemannian random waves.Bernoulli, 29(1):625 – 651, 2023. (Cited on p.13, 14)

2023
[34]

L. Gass. Cumulants asymptotics for the zeros counting measure of real Gaussian processes.Electronic Journal of Probability, 28(none):1 – 45, 2023. (Cited on p.15)

2023
[35]

L. Gass. Variance of the number of zeros of dependent Gaussian trigonometric polynomials.Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 151(5):2225–2239, 2023. (Cited on p.15)

2023
[36]

L. Gass. Spectral criteria for the asymptotics of local functionals of Gaussian fields and their application to nodal volume, 2025. (Cited on p.13)

2025
[37]

Gass and M

L. Gass and M. Stecconi. The number of critical points of a Gaussian field: finiteness of moments.Proba- bility Theory and Related Fields, Apr 2024. (Cited on p.4, 15) NEW CHAOS DECOMPOSITION FOR GAUSSIAN NODAL VOLUMES 37

2024
[38]

M. W. Hirsch.Differential topology, volume 33 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994. Corrected reprint of the 1976 original. (Cited on p.8)

1994
[39]

B. Keeler. A logarithmic improvement in the two-point Weyl Law for manifolds without conjugate points. Annales de l’Institut Fourier, 74(2):719–762, 2024. (Cited on p.5, 12, 14)

2024
[40]

Kochneff

E. Kochneff. Rotational symmetry of the Hermite projection operators.Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 124:1539– 1547, 1996. (Cited on p.15)

1996
[41]

E. Kostlan. On the distribution of roots of random polynomials. InFrom Topology to Computation: Proceedings of the Smalefest (Berkeley, CA, 1990), pages 419–431. Springer, New York, 1993. (Cited on p.5)

1990
[42]

M. F. Kratz and J. R. León. Central limit theorems for level functionals of stationary Gaussian processes and fields.J. Theoret. Probab., 14(3):639–672, 2001. (Cited on p.6, 17)

2001
[43]

Krishnapur, P

M. Krishnapur, P. Kurlberg, and I. Wigman. Nodal length fluctuations for arithmetic random waves.Ann. of Math. (2), 177(2):699–737, 2013. (Cited on p.5, 15)

2013
[44]

Lerario, D

A. Lerario, D. Marinucci, M. Rossi, and M. Stecconi. Geometry and topology of spin random fields.Anal. Math. Phys., 15(2), Apr. 2025. (Cited on p.15)

2025
[45]

Lerario and M

A. Lerario and M. Stecconi. Maximal and typical topology of real polynomial singularities.Annales de l’Institut Fourier, 74(2):589–626, 2024. (Cited on p.5)

2024
[46]

Letendre

T. Letendre. Expected volume and Euler characteristic of random submanifolds.Journal of Functional Analysis, 270(8):3047–3110, 2016. (Cited on p.6, 15)

2016
[47]

Letendre

T. Letendre. Variance of the volume of random real algebraic submanifolds.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 371(6):4129–4192, 2019. (Cited on p.15)

2019
[48]

Letendre and M

T. Letendre and M. Puchol. Variance of the volume of random real algebraic submanifolds II.Indiana Univ. Math. J., 68(6):1649–1720, 2019. (Cited on p.4, 7, 15)

2019
[49]

Macci, M

C. Macci, M. Rossi, and A. P. Todino. Moderate deviation estimates for nodal lengths of random spherical harmonics.Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat., 18:249–263, 2021. (Cited on p.15)

2021
[50]

Macci, M

C. Macci, M. Rossi, and A. Vidotto. Non-universal moderate deviation principle for the nodal length of arithmetic random waves.Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat., 21:1601–1624, 2024. (Cited on p.15)

2024
[51]

L. Maini. Asymptotic covariances for functionals of weakly stationary random fields.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 170:104297, 2024. (Cited on p.5)

2024
[52]

Maini, M

L. Maini, M. Rossi, and G. Zheng. Almost sure central limit theorems via chaos expansions and related results.arXiv 2502.00759, 2025. (Cited on p.5)

2025 arXiv
[53]

Marinucci and G

D. Marinucci and G. Peccati.Random Fields on the Sphere: Representation, Limit Theorems and Cos- mological Applications. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series. Cambridge University Press,
[54]

Marinucci, G

D. Marinucci, G. Peccati, M. Rossi, and I. Wigman. Non-universality of nodal length distribution for arithmetic random waves.Geom. Funct. Anal., 26(3):926–960, 2016. (Cited on p.5, 6, 15, 17)

2016
[55]

Marinucci, M

D. Marinucci, M. Rossi, and A. P. Todino. Laguerre expansion for nodal volumes and applications.arXiv 2312.09962, 2023. (Cited on p.5, 7, 14, 15, 21, 35)

2023 arXiv
[56]

Marinucci, M

D. Marinucci, M. Rossi, and I. Wigman. The asymptotic equivalence of the sample trispectrum and the nodal length for random spherical harmonics.Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat., 56(1):374–390,
[57]

Mathis and M

L. Mathis and M. Stecconi. Expectation of a random submanifold: the zonoid section.Annales Henri Lebesgue, 7:903–967, 2024. (Cited on p.5, 11, 15)

2024
[58]

Nazarov and M

F. Nazarov and M. Sodin. On the number of nodal domains of random spherical harmonics.American Journal of Mathematics, 131:1337 – 1357, 2007. (Cited on p.5)

2007
[59]

L. I. Nicolaescu. A stochastic Gauss-Bonnet-Chern formula.Probab. Theory Related Fields, 165(1-2):235– 265, 2016. (Cited on p.15)

2016
[60]

L. I. Nicolaescu and N. Savale. The Gauss-Bonnet-Chern theorem: a probabilistic perspective.Probab. Theory Related Fields, 369(4):2951–2986, 2016. (Cited on p.15)

2016
[61]

Notarnicola

M. Notarnicola. Matrix Hermite polynomials, Random determinants and the geometry of Gaussian fields. Annales Henri Lebesgue, 6:975–1030, 2023. (Cited on p.6, 15)

2023
[62]

Notarnicola, G

M. Notarnicola, G. Peccati, and A. Vidotto. A. Functional Convergence of Berry’s Nodal Lengths: Ap- proximate Tightness and Total Disorder.J Stat Phys, 190:97, 2023. (Cited on p.5, 15)

2023
[63]

Nourdin and G

I. Nourdin and G. Peccati.Normal Approximations with Malliavin Calculus: From Stein’s Method to Universality. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 2012. (Cited on p.3, 4, 5, 16)

2012
[64]

Nourdin, G

I. Nourdin, G. Peccati, and M. Rossi. Nodal statistics of planar random waves.Communications in Math- ematical Physics, 369:99–151, 2019. (Cited on p.5, 14, 15) NEW CHAOS DECOMPOSITION FOR GAUSSIAN NODAL VOLUMES 38

2019
[65]

Oravecz, Z

F. Oravecz, Z. Rudnick, and I. Wigman. The Leray measure of nodal sets for random eigenfunctions on the torus.Annales de l’Institut Fourier, 58(1):299–335, 2008. (Cited on p.5, 15)

2008
[66]

Peccati and M

G. Peccati and M. Stecconi. Nodal volumes as differentiable functionals of Gaussian fields.Trans. Am. Math. Soc., Published electronically, May 2025. (Cited on p.4, 15)

2025
[67]

Peccati and A

G. Peccati and A. Vidotto. Gaussian random measures generated by Berry’s nodal sets.J. Stat. Phys., 178(4):996–1027, 2020. (Cited on p.5, 15)

2020
[68]

Pistolato and M

F. Pistolato and M. Stecconi. Expected Lipschitz-Killing curvatures for spin random fields and other non-isotropic fields.arXiv:2406.04850, 2024. (Cited on p.5, 18)

2024
[69]

A. Rivera. High-dimensional Monochromatic Random Waves approximate the Bargmann-Fock field. work- ing paper or preprint, Aug. 2021. (Cited on p.5)

2021
[70]

M. Rossi. Random nodal lengths and wiener chaos.Probabilistic Methods in Geometry, Topology and Spectral Theory, 2018. (Cited on p.15)

2018
[71]

Rudnick and I

Z. Rudnick and I. Wigman. On the volume of nodal sets for eigenfunctions of the Laplacian on the torus. Annales Henri Poincare, 9(1):109–130, 2008. (Cited on p.5, 15)

2008
[72]

Sarnak and I

P. Sarnak and I. Wigman. Topologies of nodal sets of random band-limited functions.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 72(2):275–342, 2019. (Cited on p.13)

2019
[73]

Schneider.Convex bodies: the Brunn-Minkowski theory, volume 151 ofEncyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications

R. Schneider.Convex bodies: the Brunn-Minkowski theory, volume 151 ofEncyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, expanded edition, 2014. (Cited on p.11, 20)

2014
[74]

Shub and S

M. Shub and S. Smale. Complexity of Bézout’s theorem. I. Geometric aspects.J. Amer. Math. Soc., 6(2):459–501, 1993. (Cited on p.15)

1993
[75]

K. Smutek. Fluctuations of the nodal number in the two-energy planar Berry random wave model.Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat., 22:1–72, 2025. (Cited on p.15)

2025
[76]

Stecconi

M. Stecconi. Kac-Rice formula for transverse intersections.Analysis and Mathematical Physics, 12(2):44,
[77]

Thangavelu

S. Thangavelu. Hermite expansions onRn for radial functions.Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 118(4):1097–1102,
[78]

A. P. Todino. Nodal lengths in shrinking domains for random eigenfunctions onS2.Bernoulli, 26(4):3081 – 3110, 2020. (Cited on p.15)

2020
[79]

A. P. Todino. No smooth phase transition for the nodal length of band-limited spherical random fields. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 169:104273, 2024. (Cited on p.14, 15)

2024
[80]

A. Vidotto. A note on the reduction principle for the nodal length of planar random waves.Statistics & Probability Letters, 174:109090, 2021. (Cited on p.15)

2021
[81]

I. Wigman. On the distribution of the nodal sets of random spherical harmonics.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 50(1):013521, 01 2009. (Cited on p.5, 14, 15)

2009
[82]

I. Wigman. Fluctuations of the nodal length of random spherical harmonics.Communications in Mathe- matical Physics, 298(3):787, 2010. (Cited on p.5, 13, 15)

2010
[83]

I. Wigman. On the expected Betti numbers of the nodal set of random fields.Analysis & pde, 3 2020. (Cited on p.5, 13)

2020
[84]

I. Wigman. On the nodal structures of random fields: a decade of results.Journal of Applied and Com- putational Topology, pages 1–43, 2023. (Cited on p.13, 14)

2023
[85]

Zelditch

S. Zelditch. Real and complex zeros of Riemannian random waves. In M. Kotani, H. Naito, and T. Tate, editors,Spectral Analysis in Geometry and Number Theory, Contemporary Mathematics, pages 321–342. American Mathematical Society, 2009. (Cited on p.5, 12, 14)

2009
[86]

Zwillinger.CRC standard mathematical tables and formulae

D. Zwillinger.CRC standard mathematical tables and formulae. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York, 33th ed. edition, 2018. (Cited on p.34)

2018
[2020]

(Cited on p.5, 6, 15, 17)

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [2]

Ancona, L

M. Ancona, L. Gass, T. Letendre, and M. Stecconi. Zeros and critical points of Gaussian fields: Cumulants asymptotics and limit theorems.arXiv:2501.10226, 2025. (Cited on p.14)

arXiv 2025

[2] [1]

R. J. Adler and J. E. Taylor.Random fields and geometry. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, New York, 2007. (Cited on p.3, 5)

2007

[3] [3]

Ancona and T

M. Ancona and T. Letendre. Roots of Kostlan polynomials: moments, strong Law of Large Numbers and Central Limit Theorem.Annales Henri Lebesgue, 4:1659–1703, 2021. (Cited on p.5, 15)

2021

[4] [4]

Ancona and T

M. Ancona and T. Letendre. Zeros of smooth stationary Gaussian processes.Electron. J. Probab., 26:Paper No. 68, 81, 2021. (Cited on p.15)

2021

[5] [5]

Ancona and T

M. Ancona and T. Letendre. Multijet bundles and application to the finiteness of moments for zeros of Gaussian fields.To appear in Analysis & PDE, 2025+. (Cited on p.4, 15)

2025

[6] [6]

Angst and G

J. Angst and G. Poly. On the absolute continuity of random nodal volumes.The Annals of Probability, 48(5):2145–2175, 2020. (Cited on p.4, 15)

2020

[7] [7]

Armentano, J

D. Armentano, J. M. Azaïs, F. Dalmao, J. R. León, and E. Mordecki. On the finiteness of the moments of the measure of level sets of random fields.Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics, 37(1):219 – 245, 2023. (Cited on p.15)

2023

[8] [8]

Azais and M

J.-M. Azais and M. Wschebor.Level sets and extrema of random processes and fields. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 2009. (Cited on p.3)

2009