Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 54 references

A Paley-Wiener-Schwartz Theorem for smooth valuations on convex functions

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A Fourier decay test classifies all affine-invariant valuation subspaces on convex functions.

desk verdict A strong structural advance in valuations on convex functions, with the main classification resting on one unpublished lemma that a referee should ask to be proved. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.22464 v1 pith:CIGSUTBG submitted 2025-05-28 math.FA math.MG

Jonas Knoerr This is my paper
classification math.FAmath.MG MSC 52B4526B2553C6552A3913P10
keywords valuationtheoryconvexfunctionsduallyepi-translationinvariantGoodey-WeildistributionsFourier-LaplacetransformPaley-Wiener-SchwartztheoremMonge-Ampèreoperatorsaffinesubspaces
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves a Paley–Wiener–Schwartz theorem for continuous valuations on convex functions that are dually epi-translation invariant, meaning they are unchanged when an affine function is added to the input. The central result, Theorem C, characterizes when such a valuation is smooth and supported in a compact convex set: the Fourier–Laplace transform of its associated Goodey–Weil distribution must satisfy sharp decay estimates along the diagonal and a prescribed growth bound away from it. From this criterion the author derives a complete classification, Theorem A, of all closed affine-invariant subspaces of the k-homogeneous valuation space: each is a finite-codimensional space W_d, these spaces are totally ordered by inclusion, and any invariant subspace containing a valuation that does not vanish on some positive semidefinite quadratic form is dense. If the classification is correct, the structure of invariant subspaces for valuations on convex functions mirrors the irreducibility picture for valuations on convex bodies, with a countable, totally ordered, Noetherian lattice replacing a finite list of irreducible pieces. The same Fourier criterion also yields concrete density statements, for example that valuations built from simple second differences are sequentially dense in the 1-homogeneous space.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Goodey–Weil distribution GW(µ), the unique compactly supported distribution on (R^n)^k whose action on tensor products of smooth convex functions reproduces the polarization of µ. The Fourier transform of this distribution is studied in coordinates adapted to the diagonal: writing a point of (C^n)^k as an n-by-k matrix w, the diagonal component d(w) is the averaged matrix with all columns equal to the sum of the columns of w, and the off-diagonal part w-d(w) controls the transversal behavior. The module dM2_k consists of entire functions on n-by-k matrices that are OCn-linear combinations of quadratic products of k-minors, and Theorem B shows that every Goodey–Weil transform lies in this module. The proof of this membership runs through a division algorithm for the P(C^n)-submodule generated by quadratic k-minors, using a Gröbner basis construction, combined with a restriction argument that identifies the lowest-order terms via the known classification of top-degree valuations on convex functions. A final ingredient is the irreducible GL(n,R)-representation structure of the space MA Val_k of Monge–Ampère-operator-valued valuations, which allows the author to bootstrap density from a single nonzero Hessian-measure valuation to the full space.

What would settle it

Test Lemma 4.6 directly: take a k-homogeneous valuation µ, push it forward to a real k-plane E, compute the density φ_E via the top-degree classification, and compare F(GW(µ)) restricted to E⊗C with det((w_i,w_j)) F_E(φ_E)(Σ w_j). A single plane E or valuation for which the two sides differ would invalidate the restriction identity underlying Lemma 4.15, and hence the module identification and the classification of affine-invariant subspaces.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a characterization of smooth dually epi-translation invariant valuations on convex functions in terms of the Fourier–Laplace transform of their Goodey–Weil distributions. Each k-homogeneous valuation µ is encoded by a unique compactly supported distribution GW(µ) on (R^n)^k, supported on the diagonal, through the polarization identity µ(f) = GW(µ)[$f^{{⊗k}}$]. Theorem C states that µ is smooth and has support contained in a compact convex set A if and only if its Fourier–Laplace transform satisfies the estimate |F(GW(µ))[w]| ≤ C_N (1+|d(w)|)^{-N} $e^{{h_A(Σ Im w_j)}}$ |w-d(w)|^{2(k-1)} for every N, where d(w) is the diagonal component of the matrix w and the transform lies in the module dM2_k generated by quadratic products of k-minors. The theorem also gives the converse: any entire function in that module satisfying these estimates is the Fourier–Laplace transform of a unique smooth valuation with support in A. This Paley–Wiener–Schwartz criterion is then used to prove Theorem D, identifying smooth valuations with integrals of smooth compactly supported densities against mixed Monge–Ampère operators, and to prove Theorem A, the classification of all closed affine-invariant subspaces of VConv_k(R^n) as the finite-codimensional spaces W_d, totally ordered by inclusion, with a density criterion for subspaces containing a valuation that does not annihilate a positive semidefinite quadratic form.

Load-bearing premise

The whole classification chain rests on a restriction formula from prior work: when a k-homogeneous valuation is pushed forward to a k-dimensional subspace, the Fourier–Laplace transform of its Goodey–Weil distribution equals the determinant of the Gram matrix of the arguments times the Fourier transform of the density of the pushforward valuation, together with the known classification of top-degree valuations on convex functions; if either input fails, the identification of the polynomial module M with P(C^n)M2_k breaks, and with it Theorems B, C, and A.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every closed Aff(n,R)-invariant subspace of VConv_k(R^n) is one of the finite-codimensional spaces W_d, so there are only countably many such subspaces and the representation is Noetherian.
  • An affine-invariant subspace is sequentially dense as soon as it contains a valuation µ with µ(q) ≠ 0 for some positive semidefinite quadratic form q, which applies to the span of valuations defined by integrating smooth densities against mixed Monge–Ampère operators.
  • Smooth valuations, valuations representable by integration against the differential cycle, and valuations obtained by integrating smooth compactly supported densities against a basis of Monge–Ampère-operator valuations are the same class, with estimate (4) as a necessary and sufficient certificate.
  • Valuations of the form f ↦ Σ_j c_j (f(x_j)+f(y_j)-2f((x_j+y_j)/2)) are sequentially dense in VConv_1(R^n).
  • For any affine-invariant families of convex functions and compactly supported functions, if a mixed Hessian-type integral is nonzero for one pair, the corresponding Monge–Ampère valuations span a dense subspace of VConv_k(R^n).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This is an editor's inference, not stated in the paper: the module-plus-decay template used here may transfer to valuations invariant under other groups, such as the special linear or unitary groups, provided one identifies the appropriate invariant polynomial module in place of M2_k.
  • The totally ordered classification suggests a numerical invariant for a closed invariant subspace W, namely the order d such that W = W_d; this index measures how many derivatives of a valuation must be integrated out before the valuation lies in W and could be useful as a filtration index in further structural questions.
  • For k = 1, the density of second differences is constructive: it implies that any continuous dually epi-translation invariant valuation of degree one can be approximated by finite linear combinations of second differences, a statement that could in principle be tested numerically on compact families of convex functions.
  • Since the classical Paley–Wiener–Schwartz theorem is used only to convert decay estimates into compactly supported smooth densities, the criterion (4) also suggests an inverse-synthesis procedure: given an entire function in dM2_k with the right growth, one can construct a valuation with prescribed support by taking Fourier transforms of the coefficients.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper develops a Paley-Wiener-Schwartz theorem for smooth dually epi-translation invariant valuations on convex functions. The main analytic result, Theorem C, characterizes smooth valuations with support in a compact convex set A in terms of decay estimates on the Fourier-Laplace transform of their Goodey-Weil distributions, with a sharp polynomial factor |w-d(w)|^{2(k-1)}. From this the author derives Theorem D, an equivalence between smoothness, representability by integration against the differential cycle, and integral representation via mixed Monge-Ampere operators. In the final section these results are used to classify closed affine invariant subspaces of VConv_k(Rn): every such subspace is one of the explicitly defined spaces W_d, hence has finite codimension, the family is totally ordered by inclusion, and a nonvanishing condition on a quadratic form implies density (Theorem A and Theorem 6.1).

Significance. If the proof is correct, this is a substantial contribution to the valuation theory of convex functions. It gives the first structural classification of affine invariant closed subspaces in this setting, mirroring Alesker's irreducibility theorem for valuations on convex bodies, and it introduces a new analytic tool, the Paley-Wiener-Schwartz criterion, that is likely to be useful beyond the specific applications here. The paper is careful with estimates: explicit constants appear in Lemma 5.1, Theorem 2.12, and Corollary 4.8, and the algebraic module-theoretic core in Sections 2.2-2.3 is developed in detail. The main caveat is that two load-bearing results are quoted from unpublished preprints of the author, which weakens the self-containedness of the central argument.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.1, Lemma 4.6 and §4.3, Lemma 4.15] Lemma 4.6 is quoted from the author's unpublished preprint [29] and is not proved in this manuscript. It is the only route to Corollary 4.7 and to the divisibility conclusion in Lemma 4.15, and hence to the identification M = P(C^n)M^2_k in Corollary 4.16. Since Theorem B, the converse direction of Theorem C, and Theorem A all build on Corollary 4.16, this is a load-bearing external input. The published top-degree classification [13, Theorem 5] supplies only the existence of the density phi_E, not the specific Fourier-Laplace identity stated in Lemma 4.6. The manuscript should either include a proof of Lemma 4.6 or give a published, refereed reference for it; otherwise the central classification is not verifiable from the material presented.
  2. [§6.1, proof of Theorem 6.1] The proof of sequential density in Theorem 6.1 depends on [30, Theorem 1.3] and [30, Theorem 1.4], which are also cited only as an arXiv preprint by the author. These results provide the representation of the SO(n)-invariant smooth valuation mu_0 as an integral against the Hessian measure and the support bound for its density. This representation is used to construct the approximating valuations mu_psi,delta and to identify the space F_A with C_A(R^n); without it, the density conclusion in Theorem A(3) is unsupported. Like Lemma 4.6, this dependency should be resolved by a proof or by a published reference before the manuscript can be accepted as a stand-alone contribution.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§2.3, Theorem 2.8] In the proof of Theorem 2.8, the sentence 'Omitting terms, we may assume that the initial terms are mutually indivisible' is terse; the passage to a minimal ordered Grobner basis and the preservation of the additional condition on P_i - in(P_i) should be stated explicitly.
  2. [§5, Lemma 5.1] The proof of Lemma 5.1 derives the estimate with (1+|w_k|)^{-N+3k} and then says this shows the desired estimate for the exponent N-3k; to match the statement for every N one should replace N by N+3k. Please clarify the bookkeeping of the exponent.
  3. [Throughout] The paper switches between the coordinates (w_1,...,w_k) and the transformed coordinates used to define F(µ); since the module action of O_C^n is defined in the last column in one coordinate system but by the sum of columns in another, a short table or repeated reminder of the two module structures would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central Paley–Wiener–Schwartz criterion and the affine-invariant subspace classification rest on external, parameter-free prior results rather than on the paper's own conclusions.

full rationale

The paper's derivation of the Paley–Wiener–Schwartz criterion (Theorem C), the smooth-valuation characterization (Theorem D), and the affine-invariant subspace classification (Theorem A) does not reduce to its own inputs. Theorem B's module membership is proved by a power-series and restriction argument whose main external inputs are the top-degree classification [13, Theorem 5] and the Fourier–Laplace restriction formula [29, Lemma 2.6], quoted as Lemma 4.6. Both are parameter-free prior results; neither states or assumes Theorems A, B, C, or D. The restriction formula is load-bearing and is a self-citation to an unpublished preprint by the author, but it is a concrete external identity rather than a restatement of the target classification. Similarly, the irreducibility of MA Valk(Rn) imported from [32, Theorem 6.2] is a prior published theorem with independent content; it is used to propagate invariance, not to assume the desired conclusion. The remaining steps — the module generated by quadratic products of k-minors, the Gröbner-division estimates, and the Paley–Wiener decay arguments — are carried out in the paper itself. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is invoked merely to forbid alternatives, and no construction defines the target quantity in terms of itself. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained relative to previously established external results and exhibits no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities appear. The central claim rests on standard complex analysis and representation theory plus several prior published structural theorems in valuation theory, which are cited with locations and treated as black boxes.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Classical Paley-Wiener-Schwartz theorem (Theorem 1.4, after Hormander [27])
    Used in Lemma 5.1 and Theorem 5.3 to turn exponential decay estimates into compactly supported smooth functions; this is a standard analytic background input.
  • domain assumption Existence, uniqueness, and diagonal support of Goodey-Weil distributions (Theorem 3.1, quoted from [28, Theorem 2])
    Every valuation is encoded by a compactly supported distribution on the diagonal; this underpins the Fourier-Laplace transform and the support notion used throughout the paper.
  • domain assumption Top-degree classification of dually epi-translation invariant valuations (VConv_n described by [13, Theorem 5])
    Invoked through [29, Lemma 2.6] in Lemma 4.15 to compute restrictions of F(mu) to subspaces E and to identify the polynomial module M with P(Cn)M2_k.
  • domain assumption Structure of MA Valk(Rn): characterization by mixed Monge-Ampere operators, finite dimensionality, and bijective Q map (Theorem 3.6 and Lemma 4.10, from [32])
    Used to write smooth valuations as integrals of mixed Monge-Ampere operators in Theorem D and to define the module generators used in Theorem 4.18.
  • domain assumption Irreducibility of the GL(n,R)-representation MA Valk(Rn) (Theorem 6.2, quoted from [32, Theorem 1.3])
    Applied in the proof of Theorem 6.1 to show that the invariant subspace E must be all of MA Valk, which is the step that turns local density into global density.
  • standard math Standard facts on GL(n,C) highest-weight theory, Gauss decomposition, and multiplicity-free weights of P(Ck) used in Proposition 2.4 and Corollary 2.5
    Used to characterize highest weight vectors of P(Cn)M2_k as c Delta_k^2 w_{1,k}^d; this is background representation theory, not a new claim of the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Paley-Wiener-Schwartz Theorem for smooth valuations on convex functions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CIGSUTBG

@misc{pith2026250522464,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Paley-Wiener-Schwartz Theorem for smooth valuations on convex functions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CIGSUTBG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.22464}
}
read the original abstract

Continuous dually epi-translation invariant valuations on convex functions are characterized in terms of the Fourier-Laplace transform of the associated Goodey-Weil distributions. This description is used to obtain integral representations of the smooth vectors of the natural representation of the group of translations on the space of these valuations. As an application, a complete classification of all closed and affine invariant subspaces is established, yielding density results for valuations defined in terms of mixed Monge-Amp\`ere operators.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [29]

    Unitarily invariant valuations on convex functions

    Jonas Knoerr. Unitarily invariant valuations on convex functions. arXiv:2112.14658, 2021

    work page arXiv 2021

  2. [32]

    Monge-Amp` ere operators and valuations.Calc

    Jonas Knoerr. Monge-Amp` ere operators and valuations.Calc. Var. Partial Differen- tial Equations , 63(4):Paper No. 89, 34, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [13]

    A homogeneous decompo- sition theorem for valuations on convex functions

    Andrea Colesanti, Monika Ludwig, and Fabian Mussnig. A homogeneous decompo- sition theorem for valuations on convex functions. J. Funct. Anal. , 279(5):Paper No. 108573, 25, 2020

    work page 2020

  4. [1]

    Description of translation invariant valuations on convex sets with solution of P

    Semyon Alesker. Description of translation invariant valuations on convex sets with solution of P. McMullen’s conjecture. Geom. Funct. Anal., 11(2):244–272, 2001

    work page 2001

  5. [2]

    Valuations on convex sets, non-commutative determinants, and pluripotential theory

    Semyon Alesker. Valuations on convex sets, non-commutative determinants, and pluripotential theory. Adv. Math., 195(2):561–595, 2005

    work page 2005

  6. [3]

    Theory of valuations on manifolds

    Semyon Alesker. Theory of valuations on manifolds. I. Linear spaces. Israel J. Math., 156:311–339, 2006

    work page 2006

  7. [4]

    Valuations on convex functions and convex sets and Monge-Amp` ere operators

    Semyon Alesker. Valuations on convex functions and convex sets and Monge-Amp` ere operators. Adv. Geom., 19(3):313–322, 2019

    work page 2019

  8. [5]

    Convex valuations invariant under the Lorentz group

    Semyon Alesker and Dmitry Faifman. Convex valuations invariant under the Lorentz group. J. Differential Geom. , 98(2):183–236, 2014

    work page 2014

Show all 54 references
  1. [6]

    A Hadwiger-type theorem for the special unitary group

    Andreas Bernig. A Hadwiger-type theorem for the special unitary group. Geom. Funct. Anal., 19(2):356–372, 2009

    2009

  2. [7]

    Valuations on manifolds and Rumin cohomol- ogy

    Andreas Bernig and Ludwig Br¨ ocker. Valuations on manifolds and Rumin cohomol- ogy. J. Differential Geom. , 75(3):433–457, 2007

    2007

  3. [8]

    Curvature measures of pseudo- Riemannian manifolds

    Andreas Bernig, Dmitry Faifman, and Gil Solanes. Curvature measures of pseudo- Riemannian manifolds. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 788:77–127, 2022

    2022

  4. [9]

    Hard Lefschetz theorem and Hodge-Riemann relations for convex valuations

    Andreas Bernig, Jan Kotrbat´ y, and Thomas Wannerer. Hard Lefschetz theorem and Hodge-Riemann relations for convex valuations. arXiv:2312.12294, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  5. [10]

    The homogeneous decompo- sition of dually translation invariant valuations on Lipschitz functions on the sphere

    Andrea Colesanti, Jonas Knoerr, and Daniele Pagnini. The homogeneous decompo- sition of dually translation invariant valuations on Lipschitz functions on the sphere. arXiv:2401.05913, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  6. [11]

    Minkowski valuations on convex functions

    Andrea Colesanti, Monika Ludwig, and Fabian Mussnig. Minkowski valuations on convex functions. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations , 56(6):Paper No. 162, 29, 2017

    2017

  7. [12]

    Hessian valuations

    Andrea Colesanti, Monika Ludwig, and Fabian Mussnig. Hessian valuations. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 69(4):1275–1315, 2020

    2020

  8. [14]

    The Hadwiger theorem on convex functions, III: Steiner formulas and mixed Monge-Amp` ere measures

    Andrea Colesanti, Monika Ludwig, and Fabian Mussnig. The Hadwiger theorem on convex functions, III: Steiner formulas and mixed Monge-Amp` ere measures. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations , 61(5):Paper No. 181, 37, 2022

    2022

  9. [15]

    The Hadwiger theorem on convex functions, IV: The Klain approach

    Andrea Colesanti, Monika Ludwig, and Fabian Mussnig. The Hadwiger theorem on convex functions, IV: The Klain approach. Adv. Math., 413:Paper No. 108832, 2023. PALEY–WIENER–SCHW ARTZ THEOREM FOR V ALUATIONS 53

    2023

  10. [16]

    The Hadwiger theorem on convex functions, I

    Andrea Colesanti, Monika Ludwig, and Fabian Mussnig. The Hadwiger theorem on convex functions, I. Geom. Funct. Anal., 34(6):1839–1898, 2024

    2024

  11. [17]

    A class of invariant valuations on Lip(Sn−1)

    Andrea Colesanti, Daniele Pagnini, Pedro Tradacete, and Ignacio Villanueva. A class of invariant valuations on Lip(Sn−1). Adv. Math., 366:Paper No. 107069, 37, 2020

    2020

  12. [18]

    Con- tinuous valuations on the space of Lipschitz functions on the sphere

    Andrea Colesanti, Daniele Pagnini, Pedro Tradacete, and Ignacio Villanueva. Con- tinuous valuations on the space of Lipschitz functions on the sphere. J. Funct. Anal., 280(4):Paper No. 108873, 43, 2021

    2021

  13. [19]

    Commutative algebra, volume 150 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics

    David Eisenbud. Commutative algebra, volume 150 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995. With a view toward algebraic geometry

    1995

  14. [20]

    Hofst¨ atter

    Dmitry Faifman and Georg C. Hofst¨ atter. Convex valuations, from Whitney to Nash. arXiv:2306.07390, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  15. [21]

    Unimodular Valuations beyond Ehrhart

    Ansgar Freyer, Monika Ludwig, and Martin Rubey. Unimodular Valuations beyond Ehrhart. arXiv:2407.07691, 2024

    2024

  16. [22]

    Joseph H. G. Fu. Monge-Amp` ere functions. I, II.Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 38(3):745– 771, 1989

    1989

  17. [23]

    Joseph H. G. Fu. Structure of the unitary valuation algebra. J. Differential Geom. , 72(3):509–533, 2006

    2006

  18. [24]

    Distributions and valuations

    Paul Goodey and Wolfgang Weil. Distributions and valuations. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3), 49(3):504–516, 1984

    1984

  19. [25]

    Roe Goodman and Nolan R. Wallach. Symmetry, representations, and invariants , volume 255 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics . Springer, Dordrecht, 2009

    2009

  20. [26]

    Hofst¨ atter and Jonas Knoerr

    Georg C. Hofst¨ atter and Jonas Knoerr. Equivariant valuations on convex functions. arXiv:2407.08304, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  21. [27]

    Lars H¨ ormander.The analysis of linear partial differential operators. I . Classics in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin, 2003

    2003

  22. [28]

    The support of dually epi-translation invariant valuations on convex functions

    Jonas Knoerr. The support of dually epi-translation invariant valuations on convex functions. J. Funct. Anal. , 281(5):Paper No. 109059, 52, 2021

    2021

  23. [30]

    Singular valuations and the Hadwiger theorem on convex functions

    Jonas Knoerr. Singular valuations and the Hadwiger theorem on convex functions. arXiv:2209.05158, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  24. [31]

    A geometric decomposition for unitarily invariant valuations on convex functions

    Jonas Knoerr. A geometric decomposition for unitarily invariant valuations on convex functions. arXiv:2408.01352, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Smooth valuations on convex bodies and finite linear combinations of mixed volumes

    Jonas Knoerr. Smooth valuations on convex bodies and finite linear combinations of mixed volumes. arXiv:2312.08183, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Smooth valuations on convex functions

    Jonas Knoerr. Smooth valuations on convex functions. J. Differential Geom. , 126(2):801–835, 2024

    2024

  27. [35]

    From valuations on convex bodies to convex func- tions

    Jonas Knoerr and Jacopo Ulivelli. From valuations on convex bodies to convex func- tions. Math. Ann., 2024

    2024

  28. [36]

    Polynomial valuations on convex functions and their maximal extensions

    Jonas Knoerr and Jacopo Ulivelli. Polynomial valuations on convex functions and their maximal extensions. arXiv:2408.06946, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    From harmonic analysis of translation-invariant valuations to geometric inequalities for convex bodies.Geom

    Jan Kotrbat´ y and Thomas Wannerer. From harmonic analysis of translation-invariant valuations to geometric inequalities for convex bodies.Geom. Funct. Anal., 33(2):541– 592, 2023

    2023

  30. [38]

    Laplace transforms and valuations

    Jin Li and Dan Ma. Laplace transforms and valuations. J. Funct. Anal., 272(2):738– 758, 2017

    2017

  31. [39]

    Fisher information and matrix-valued valuations

    Monika Ludwig. Fisher information and matrix-valued valuations. Adv. Math. , 226(3):2700–2711, 2011

    2011

  32. [40]

    Valuations on Sobolev spaces

    Monika Ludwig. Valuations on Sobolev spaces. Amer. J. Math., 134(3):827–842, 2012

    2012

  33. [41]

    A classification of SL( n) invariant valuations

    Monika Ludwig and Matthias Reitzner. A classification of SL( n) invariant valuations. Ann. of Math. (2) , 172(2):1219–1267, 2010

    2010

  34. [42]

    Valuations and Euler-type relations on certain classes of convex polytopes

    Peter McMullen. Valuations and Euler-type relations on certain classes of convex polytopes. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) , 35(1):113–135, 1977

    1977

  35. [43]

    Continuous translation-invariant valuations on the space of compact convex sets

    Peter McMullen. Continuous translation-invariant valuations on the space of compact convex sets. Arch. Math. (Basel) , 34(4):377–384, 1980. 54 JONAS KNOERR

    1980

  36. [44]

    Mouamine and Fabian Mussnig

    Mohamed A. Mouamine and Fabian Mussnig. The vectorial Hadwiger theorem on convex functions. arXiv:2504.04952, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Volume, polar volume and Euler characteristic for convex functions

    Fabian Mussnig. Volume, polar volume and Euler characteristic for convex functions. Adv. Math., 344:340–373, 2019

    2019

  38. [46]

    SL( n) invariant valuations on super-coercive convex functions

    Fabian Mussnig. SL( n) invariant valuations on super-coercive convex functions. Canad. J. Math. , 73(1):108–130, 2021

    2021

  39. [47]

    Tyrrell Rockafellar

    R. Tyrrell Rockafellar. Convex analysis . Princeton Landmarks in Mathematics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1997. Reprint of the 1970 original, Prince- ton Paperbacks

    1997

  40. [48]

    Tyrrell Rockafellar and Roger J.-B

    R. Tyrrell Rockafellar and Roger J.-B. Wets. Variational analysis , volume 317 of Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Math- ematical Sciences]. Springer, Berlin, 1998

    1998

  41. [49]

    Gr¨ obner bases and Stanley decompositions of determinantal rings

    Bernd Sturmfels. Gr¨ obner bases and Stanley decompositions of determinantal rings. Math. Z. , 205(1):137–144, 1990

    1990

  42. [50]

    Radial continuous valuations on star bodies

    Pedro Tradacete and Ignacio Villanueva. Radial continuous valuations on star bodies. J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 454(2):995–1018, 2017

    2017

  43. [51]

    Continuity and representation of valuations on star bodies

    Pedro Tradacete and Ignacio Villanueva. Continuity and representation of valuations on star bodies. Adv. Math., 329:361–391, 2018

    2018

  44. [52]

    Valuations on Banach lattices

    Pedro Tradacete and Ignacio Villanueva. Valuations on Banach lattices. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , (1):287–319, 2020

    2020

  45. [53]

    Radial continuous rotation invariant valuations on star bodies

    Ignacio Villanueva. Radial continuous rotation invariant valuations on star bodies. Adv. Math., 291:961–981, 2016

    2016

  46. [54]

    The module of unitarily invariant area measures

    Thomas Wannerer. The module of unitarily invariant area measures. J. Differential Geom., 96(1):141–182, 2014. Jonas Knoerr, Institute of Discrete Mathematics and Geometry, TU Wien, Wiedner Hauptstrasse 8-10, 1040 Wien, Austria E-mail address : jonas.knoerr@tuwien.ac.at

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.