Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 34 references

1-D Schr\"odinger operator on a star graph with nondefinite weight function

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The indefinite Kirchhoff Laplacian on a star graph has a complete explicit point spectrum and its eigenfunctions form a Riesz basis.

desk verdict Worth engaging: the eigen-equation and Riesz-basis result hold up, but Theorem 4.1's printed asymptotics and Remark (ii) are wrong and need fixing. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.22901 v2 pith:Q2325X6G submitted 2025-05-28 math.SP

Edison Leguizamón , Carsten Trunk , Mitsuru Wilson , Monika Winklmeier This is my paper
classification math.SP MSC 34B4547B5034L05
keywords metricgraphsstarindefiniteinnerproductKreinspaceKirchhoffLaplacianRieszbasispointspectrumboundarytriples
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

On a star graph with unit-length edges, the paper considers the operator that acts as $-\frac{\mathrm{d}^2}{\mathrm{d}x^2}$ on $n_+$ edges and $+\frac{\mathrm{d}^2}{\mathrm{d}x^2}$ on $n_-$ edges, with Dirichlet conditions at the outer vertices and a Kirchhoff condition at the central vertex. The paper's central claim is that this indefinite Kirchhoff Laplacian has a purely discrete, real spectrum that is completely described by an explicit list: the points $\pm(k\pi)^2$ with multiplicities $n_\pm-1$, plus one additional simple eigenvalue in each gap between consecutive sign-definite eigenvalues. It also proves that the operator is similar to a self-adjoint operator on $L^2(G)$, so its eigenfunctions form a Riesz basis. If true, this gives a full spectral picture of a non-self-adjoint graph operator and shows that the ratio $n_+/n_-$ is encoded in the first positive eigenvalue.

What carries the argument

The carrying objects are a boundary triple (a pair of boundary maps satisfying an abstract Green identity) for the maximal operator $T$ and its Weyl function. The boundary maps are $\Gamma_0 f=f(0)$ and $\Gamma_1 f=\sum_{j=1}^n f_j'(0)$, so that the auxiliary operator $A=\ker\Gamma_0$ is the direct sum of edge operators and $B=\ker\Gamma_1$ is the indefinite Kirchhoff Laplacian; both are self-adjoint extensions in the Krein space. The associated Weyl function $M(\lambda)=-\mu(n_+\cot\mu+n_-\coth\mu)$, $\mu^2=\lambda$, enters the rank-one resolvent formula $(A-\lambda)^{-1}-(B-\lambda)^{-1}=-\gamma(\lambda)M(\lambda)^{-1}\gamma(\lambda)^+$, so zeros of $M$ produce the simple interlacing eigenvalues $\eta_k$, while poles of $M$ at $(k\pi)^2$ reduce the multiplicities there. For the similarity result, the paper applies a criterion requiring a bounded, boundedly invertible operator $W$ with $W(D((JB)^{1/2}))\subseteq D((JB)^{1/2})$, and constructs $W=JX$ from a local operator $X=1+Y^*Y$ that makes functions vanish near the central vertex.

What would settle it

On a concrete graph with $n_+=2$, $n_-=2$, compute $\dim\ker(B-\pi^2)$ directly by solving the Dirichlet-and-Kirchhoff boundary-value problem; Theorem 4.1 predicts dimension $1$, so finding dimension $2$ would refute the multiplicity claim. For the similarity claim, one can discretize $B$ on a fine grid, compute its eigenfunctions, and check whether they satisfy uniform Riesz-basis bounds; failure of the domain-invariance condition in Theorem 2.1 would appear as unbounded growth of those bounds.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The main results are Theorem 4.1 and Theorem 4.5. The operator $B$ is self-adjoint and positive in the Krein space $(L^2(G),[\cdot,\cdot])$, with $0\in\rho(B)$, and its point spectrum is $\sigma(B)=\{\operatorname{sign}(k)(k\pi)^2:k\in\mathbb{Z}\setminus\{0\}\}\cup\{\eta_k:k\in\mathbb{Z}\setminus\{0\}\}$ when both $n_+$ and $n_-$ are at least $2$, while the cases $n_+=1$ and $n_-=1$ omit the positive or negative $(k\pi)^2$ family. Each $\eta_k$ is the unique solution of $\coth\sqrt{\eta_k}=-(n_+/n_-)\cot\sqrt{\eta_k}$ in $(((k-1)\pi)^2,(k\pi)^2)$ for $k\ge 1$, with $n_+$ and $n_-$ interchanged for $k\le -1$; each $\eta_k$ is simple, $-\pi^2<\eta_{-1}<0<\eta_1<\pi^2$, and the eigenvalues satisfy the stated interlacing and asymptotic formulas. Theorem 4.5 shows $B$ is similar to a self-adjoint operator in $L^2(G)$, so its eigenfunctions form a Riesz basis.

Load-bearing premise

The proof borrows a perturbation inequality from [4] to pin down the eigenvalue multiplicities at $\lambda=(k\pi)^2$, but the paper does not verify that the hypotheses of that inequality hold exactly at those spectral points, where the auxiliary Weyl function has poles; if the inequality does not apply there, the asserted multiplicities $n_\pm-1$ and the interlacing count are not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The full point spectrum is explicit: every eigenvalue is either $\pm(k\pi)^2$ with multiplicity $n_\pm-1$ or one of the simple interlacing roots $\eta_k$ described by the transcendental equation.
  • The ratio $n_+/n_-$ can be read off from the first positive eigenvalue as $n_+/n_-=-\coth(\sqrt{\eta_1})\tan(\sqrt{\eta_1})$, so spectral data determine the balance of positive and negative edges.
  • The operator is similar to a self-adjoint operator, so its eigenfunctions form a Riesz basis and the indefinite problem is equivalent, up to a bounded similarity, to a standard quantum-graph problem.
  • When $n_+=n_-$, the spectrum is symmetric about the origin and the interlacing eigenvalues are $\eta_k=\operatorname{sign}(k)((|k|-\tfrac14)\pi)^2$.
  • In the limit $n_-/n_+\to 0$, the positive interlacing eigenvalues approach $(k\pi)^2$, recovering the spectrum of the sign-definite Laplacian on the positive edges.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: since $\eta_1$ fixes $n_+/n_-$ and the total number of edges is known, the same eigenvalue in principle determines $n_+$ and $n_-$ themselves, not only their ratio.
  • Editorial extension: the interlacing structure suggests a spectral fingerprinting scheme in which a finite set of low-lying eigenvalues is matched against the predicted formula to identify the sign pattern of a network; this could be tested numerically by comparing the first few roots $\eta_k$ on graphs with different $n_\pm$.
  • Editorial extension: the explicit similarity construction $W=JX$ could be pushed to estimate how far the Riesz basis is from orthonormal by bounding the norm of $X$ in terms of the cutoff parameter $\delta$ and the edge counts, quantifying the non-self-adjointness of $B$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the indefinite Kirchhoff Laplacian B on a star graph with n unit edges, with positive sign on n_+ edges and negative sign on n_- edges, Dirichlet conditions at the outer vertices, and a Kirchhoff condition at the central vertex. Working in the Krein space L^2(G) with fundamental symmetry J, the authors construct a boundary triple, compute the associated Weyl function M and γ-field, and use the resolvent relation (3.11) to derive the eigenvalue equation coth(√η_k) = -(n_+/n_-)cot(√η_k). The claimed main results are: a complete description of the point spectrum in Theorem 4.1, recovery of the ratio n_+/n_- from the first positive eigenvalue in Corollary 4.2, and similarity of B to a selfadjoint operator in L^2(G) with a Riesz basis of eigenfunctions in Theorem 4.5.

Significance. If the stated results are correct, the paper gives a transparent and constructive spectral analysis of a non-selfadjoint graph Laplacian in a Krein space: the Weyl-function computation is direct, the eigenvalue equation and interlacing structure are explicit, and the similarity proof via the explicitly constructed operator W=JX is verifiable. The spectral recovery of the sign ratio from the first positive eigenvalue is an appealing consequence. However, the manuscript contains several false statements in the statement of Theorem 4.1 and its remarks, and the proof of the multiplicity claims relies on an external rank-one perturbation estimate without a full verification of its hypotheses. These issues affect the central claim of a complete description of the point spectrum, although the main similarity/Riesz-basis argument appears to be sound.

major comments (4)
  1. [Theorem 4.1, asymptotic formulas and Remark (ii)] The asymptotic formulas in Theorem 4.1 are inverted. From Eq. (4.3), -cot μ = (n_-/n_+) coth μ, and since coth μ→1, the positive roots satisfy μ_k = kπ - arctan(n_+/n_-) + o(1), not kπ - arctan(n_-/n_+). Consequently, in Remark (ii) the limiting claims are reversed: as n_-/n_+→0, the positive roots tend to ((k-1/2)π)^2, not (kπ)^2, and the negative roots tend to -(|k|π)^2, not -((|k|-1/2)π)^2. The k→-∞ formula in the theorem also places the root outside the stated interval ((|k|-1)π,|k|π).
  2. [Theorem 4.1, case split for n_+=n_-=1] The displayed case distinction for σ(B) is not correct when n_+=n_-=1. In that situation the first and second cases both apply and assert that -(kπ)^2 and (kπ)^2 belong to σ(B), but the multiplicity statement in the same theorem gives multiplicities n_- -1 = 0 and n_+ -1 = 0. Indeed, for a two-edge graph with one positive and one negative edge, solving Bf=λf for λ=±(kπ)^2 gives no nonzero solution, so the spectrum consists only of the eigenvalues η_k. The cases should be separated as n_+=1 with n_->1, n_-=1 with n_+>1, and n_+≥2 with n_-≥2.
  3. [Theorem 4.1, Remark (i)] Remark (i) states the exact equality η_k = sign(k)((|k|-1/4)π)^2 when n_+=n_-. This is not exact: for n_+=n_-, Eq. (4.3) becomes -cot μ = coth μ, and at μ=(k-1/4)π one has -cot μ=1 while coth μ>1, so the unique root lies slightly to the right of (k-1/4)π. The equality is only valid asymptotically as k→∞; the statement should be corrected to an asymptotic assertion.
  4. [Theorem 4.1, proof of multiplicities] The proof of the multiplicity claims applies the inequality m_A(I)-1 ≤ m_B(I) ≤ m_A(I)+1 from [4] to intervals that contain the spectral points λ=(kπ)^2, where the Weyl function M has poles and the rank-one resolvent perturbation in (3.11) is not regular. The paper does not verify that the hypotheses of [4] hold for the pair (A,B) at these points. Please supply this verification, or replace the argument by a direct computation of dim ker(B-λ) at λ=±(kπ)^2.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figure 2 caption] The caption states that the figure shows intersections of -cot μ with (n_+/n_-) coth μ, but Eq. (4.3) involves (n_-/n_+) coth μ; the ratio in the caption is inverted relative to the equation.
  2. [Proof of Theorem 4.1, negative-root paragraph] In the sentence 'Similarly, μ_k ≈ kπ - arctan(n_+/n_-) for k → ∞', the limit should be k→-∞ and the formula should be expressed with |k| rather than k; as written it conflicts with the interval stated for k≤-1.
  3. [Notation in Theorem 4.1] The interval notation like (((k-1)π)^2, (kπ)^2) is cumbersome and occasionally hard to parse; a reformulation using ν = √|λ| or μ-intervals would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the spectral description and the Riesz-basis similarity are derived in-paper from the boundary triple Weyl function and an explicitly constructed transformation; the one co-authored citation ([4]) supports a general external estimate, and the printed asymptotic errors in Theorem 4.1 and Remark (ii) are correctness defects, not circular reductions.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs. In Proposition 3.3 the Weyl function M(λ) = −µ(n_+ cot µ + n_− coth µ) and γ-field are computed directly by solving (T−λ)f = 0 with Γ0 f = c for the boundary triple (C, Γ0, Γ1); the spectral equation is the explicit characteristic equation (4.3), n_−/n_+ coth µ = −cot µ, not a restatement of the desired conclusion. Uniqueness of each η_k in its stated interval is proven in-paper by monotonicity of −cot and coth, and Corollary 4.2 inverts the derived map η_1 ↦ n_+/n_−; no parameter is fitted and no known result is renamed. Theorem 4.5 verifies the hypotheses of the external Ćurgus–Najman criterion (Theorem 2.1 in [11], not a present-author citation) using the explicit operator X = 1 + Y*Y constructed and verified in Lemma 4.3 (reproduced in full); the Riesz-basis conclusion therefore rests on a real external theorem. The only present-author citation, [4], supplies the general estimate m_A(I)−1 ≤ m_B(I) ≤ m_A(I)+1, a parameter-free theorem in Krein-space perturbation theory whose assumptions do not include the target spectrum, so per the review rules it is independent support and does not raise the circularity score. Two flagged limitations are correctness issues, not circularity. First, the multiplicity proof in Theorem 4.1 invokes [4] without checking its hypotheses at the pole points λ = (kπ)² where M(λ) is singular; the claimed multiplicities n_+−1 and n_−−1 are in any case directly verifiable by the elementary kernel computation ker(B − (kπ)²) = {(a_j sin(kπx))_{j≤n_+} ⊕ 0 : Σ a_j = 0}, so the assertion does not reduce to the citation. Second, the printed asymptotics in Theorem 4.1 ('η_k ≈ (kπ − arctan(n_−/n_+))²') and Remark (ii) ('If n_−/n_+ → 0 … tend to (kπ)²') contradict the proof's own derivation ('µ is asymptotically the unique solution of tan µ = −n_+/n_−') and Eq. (4.3), which give µ_k ≈ kπ − arctan(n_+/n_−) and η_k → ((k−1/2)π)² as n_−/n_+ → 0: the printed ratio is inverted and the limiting direction reversed. These errors are algebraic misreadings of the paper's own equation; they affect the accuracy of Theorem 4.1 as stated but do not affect the eigen-equation, uniqueness, or similarity arguments, and they are not self-referential reductions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper adds no free parameters or invented entities. Its results rest on standard Krein-space and extension-theoretic theorems from the cited literature, plus the explicit boundary triple computation in Proposition 3.2. The model itself is defined by the sign pattern (n_+, n_-), which is input data, not a fitted parameter.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Theorem 2.1 (Čurgus and Najman, via [11]): similarity to a self-adjoint operator is equivalent to existence of a bounded, boundedly invertible, Krein-positive W leaving D((JA)^{1/2}) invariant; with discrete spectrum this is equivalent to a Riesz basis of eigenfunctions.
    Invoked as the abstract bridge in Theorem 4.5; external published result.
  • standard math Multiplicity estimate (4.4) from [4]: for a rank-one perturbation in a Krein space, algebraic multiplicity counts differ by at most 1 on intervals avoiding 0.
    Used in Theorem 4.1 to compute multiplicities of eigenvalues of B. Not fully re-derived in the paper.
  • standard math Second Representation Theorem and the identity D[JB] = D((JB)^{1/2}) (Kato).
    Used in Lemma 4.4 and Theorem 4.5 to translate operator domain statements into form domain statements.
  • standard math Poincaré inequality on (0,1) for H^1 functions vanishing at 1 with constant at least 1, i.e., ||f'||² ≥ ||f||².
    Gives uniform positivity of JB in equation (4.2).
  • standard math Spectrum of a non-negative self-adjoint operator in a Krein space with non-empty resolvent set is real (Ando, Langer).
    Used to conclude σ(B) ⊆ R in Theorem 4.1.
  • standard math Boundary triple parametrization of self-adjoint extensions of symmetric operators in Krein spaces (Derkach).
    Framework for Proposition 3.2 and the Weyl function computation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of 1-D Schr\"odinger operator on a star graph with nondefinite weight function." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Q2325X6G

@misc{pith2026250522901,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: 1-D Schr\"odinger operator on a star graph with nondefinite weight function},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Q2325X6G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.22901}
}
abstract

On a star graph $G$ with $n = n_+ + n_-$ edges of unit length, we study the operator $-\frac{\mathrm{d}^2}{\mathrm{d} x^2}$ on $n_+$ and $\frac{\mathrm{d}^2}{\mathrm{d} x^2}$ on $n_-$ edges equipped with Dirichlet boundary conditions at the outer vertices and a Kirchhoff condition at the central vertex. We study the spectral properties of the corresponding indefinite Kirchhoff Laplacian on $G$ and we show that it is similar to a selfadjoint operator in the Hilbert space $L^2(G)$ and that its eigenfunctions form a Riesz basis. Furthermore, we give a complete description of the point spectrum.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.22901 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A star graph with 4 edges, 4 outer vertices and one central vertex (identified with zero) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Intersections of − cot µ and n+ n− coth µ . where sj , tj ∈ (1, 2), sj ̸= tj and αj , βj ∈ R for j = 1, . . . , n. Below in (4.7) we will determine an appropriate choice for the coefficients αj and βj . It is easy to see that Y is bounded and that for all j = 1, . . . , n (Y ∗u)j (x) = Y ∗ j uj (x) = αjuj  x sj  φ  x sj  + βjuj  x tj  φ  x tj  , (4.6) Moreover, if uj admits a continuous extension at 0, then … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [13]

    Currie, S., and W atson, B. A. Indefinite boundary value problems on graphs. Oper. Matrices 5, 4 (2011), 565–584

    work page 2011

  2. [4]

    Sharp eigen- value estimates for rank one perturbations of nonnegative operators in Krein spaces

    Behrndt, J., Leben, L., Mart´ınez Per´ıa, F., M ¨ows, R., and Trunk, C. Sharp eigen- value estimates for rank one perturbations of nonnegative operators in Krein spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 439 , 2 (2016), 864–895

    work page 2016

  3. [1]

    I., and Glazman, I

    Akhiezer, N. I., and Glazman, I. M. Theory of linear operators in Hilbert space . New York, NY: Dover Publications, 1993

    work page 1993

  4. [2]

    Linear operators on Krein spaces

    Ando, T. Linear operators on Krein spaces. Sapporo: Hokkaido University, Division of Applied Mathematics. Research Institute of Applied Electricity, 1979

    work page 1979

  5. [3]

    Y., and Iokhvidov, I

    Azizov, T. Y., and Iokhvidov, I. S. Linear operators in space with an indefinite metric . Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 1989

    work page 1989

  6. [5]

    Introduction to quantum graphs , vol

    Berkolaiko, G., and Kuchment, P. Introduction to quantum graphs , vol. 186 of Mathe- matical Surveys and Monographs . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2013

    work page 2013

  7. [6]

    Hilbert space operators in quantum physics , 2nd ed

    Blank, J., Exner, P., and Havl ´ıˇcek, M. Hilbert space operators in quantum physics , 2nd ed. Theor. Math. Phys. (Cham). New York, NY: AIP Press; Berlin: Springer, 2008

    work page 2008

  8. [7]

    Indefinite inner product spaces

    Bognar, J. Indefinite inner product spaces . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1974

    work page 1974

Show all 34 references
  1. [8]

    On the regularity of the critical point infinity of definitizable operators

    ´Curgus, B. On the regularity of the critical point infinity of definitizable operators. Integral Equations Operator Theory 8 , 4 (1985), 462–488. 14 August 13, 2025

    1985

  2. [9]

    Indefinite Sturm-Liouville operators in polar form

    ´Curgus, B., Derkach, V., and Trunk, C. Indefinite Sturm-Liouville operators in polar form. Integral Equations Oper. Theory 96 , 1 (2024), 58. Id/No 2

    2024

  3. [10]

    A Kre˘in space approach to symmetric ordinary differential operators with an indefinite weight function

    ´Curgus, B., and Langer, H. A Kre˘in space approach to symmetric ordinary differential operators with an indefinite weight function. J. Differential Equations 79 , 1 (1989), 31–61

    1989

  4. [11]

    A Krein space approach to elliptic eigenvalue problems with indefinite weights

    ´Curgus, B., and Najman, B. A Krein space approach to elliptic eigenvalue problems with indefinite weights. Differ. Integral Equ. 7 , 5-6 (1994), 1241–1252

    1994

  5. [12]

    The operator (sgn x)d2/dx2 is similar to a selfadjoint operator in L2(R)

    ´Curgus, B., and Najman, B. The operator (sgn x)d2/dx2 is similar to a selfadjoint operator in L2(R). Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 123 , 4 (1995), 1125–1128

    1995

  6. [14]

    On Weyl function and generalized resolvents of a Hermitian operator in a Krein space

    Derkach, V. On Weyl function and generalized resolvents of a Hermitian operator in a Krein space. Integral Equations Oper. Theory 23 , 4 (1995), 387–415

    1995

  7. [15]

    Derkach, V. A. On generalized resolvents of Hermitian relations in Krein spaces. J. Math. Sci., New York 97 , 5 (1999), 4420–4460

    1999

  8. [16]

    A., and Malamud, M

    Derkach, V. A., and Malamud, M. M. Generalized resolvents and the boundary value problems for Hermitian operators with gaps. J. Funct. Anal. 95 , 1 (1991), 1–95

    1991

  9. [17]

    The critical point infinity associated with indefinite Sturm-Liouville problems

    Fleige, A. The critical point infinity associated with indefinite Sturm-Liouville problems. In Operator Theory. Basel: Springer, 2015, pp. 395–429

    2015

  10. [18]

    An indefinite excursion in operator theory

    Gheondea, A. An indefinite excursion in operator theory. Geometric and spectral treks in Kre ˘ ın spaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022

    2022

  11. [19]

    C., and Krein, M

    Gohberg, I. C., and Krein, M. G. Introduction to the theory of linear nonselfadjoint operators. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1969

    1969

  12. [20]

    I., and Gorbachuk, M

    Gorbachuk, V. I., and Gorbachuk, M. L. Boundary value problems for operator differ- ential equations. Math. Appl., Sov. Ser. Dordrecht etc.: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991

    1991

  13. [21]

    Non-self-adjoint graphs

    Hussein, A., Krej ˇciˇr´ık, D., and Siegl, P. Non-self-adjoint graphs. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 367, 4 (2015), 2921–2957

    2015

  14. [22]

    S., Krein, M

    Iohvidov, I. S., Krein, M. G., and Langer, H. Introduction to the spectral theory of operators in spaces with an indefinite metric , vol. 9 of Math. Res. (Berlin) . Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1982

    1982

  15. [23]

    Perturbation theory for linear operators , second ed

    Kato, T. Perturbation theory for linear operators , second ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976

    1976

  16. [24]

    Kirchhoff’s rule for quantum wires

    Kostrykin, V., and Schrader, R. Kirchhoff’s rule for quantum wires. J. Phys. A, Math. Gen. 32 , 4 (1999), 595–630

    1999

  17. [25]

    Krejn, M. G. Introduction to the geometry of indefinite J-spaces and to the theory of operators in those spaces. Transl., Ser. 2, Am. Math. Soc. 93 (1970), 103–176

    1970

  18. [26]

    Spectral geometry of graphs , vol

    Kurasov, P. Spectral geometry of graphs , vol. 293 of Oper. Theory: Adv. Appl. Berlin: Birkh¨ auser, 2024. 15 August 13, 2025

    2024

  19. [27]

    Spektralfunktionen einer Klasse J-selbstadjungierter Operatoren

    Langer, H. Spektralfunktionen einer Klasse J-selbstadjungierter Operatoren. Math. Nachr. 33 (1967), 107–120

    1967

  20. [28]

    ¨Uber eine Klasse polynomialer Scharen selbstadjungierter Operatoren im Hilber- traum

    Langer, H. ¨Uber eine Klasse polynomialer Scharen selbstadjungierter Operatoren im Hilber- traum. J. Funct. Anal. 12 (1973), 13–29

    1973

  21. [29]

    ¨Uber eine Klasse polynomialer Scharen selbstadjungierter Operatoren im Hilber- traum

    Langer, H. ¨Uber eine Klasse polynomialer Scharen selbstadjungierter Operatoren im Hilber- traum. II. J. Funct. Anal. 16 (1974), 221–234

    1974

  22. [30]

    Zur Spektraltheorie polynomialer Scharen selbstadjungierter Operatoren

    Langer, H. Zur Spektraltheorie polynomialer Scharen selbstadjungierter Operatoren. Math. Nachr. 65 (1975), 301–319

    1975

  23. [31]

    Spectral functions of definitizable operators in Krein spaces

    Langer, H. Spectral functions of definitizable operators in Krein spaces. Functional analysis, Proc. Conf., Dubrovnik/Yugosl. 1981, Lect. Notes Math. 948, 1-46, 1982

    1981

  24. [32]

    Spektraltheorie linearer Operatoren in J-R¨ aumen and einige Anwendungen auf die Schar L(λ) = λ2I + λb + c, Habilitationsschrift, Technische Universit¨ at Dresden, 1965

    Langer, H. Spektraltheorie linearer Operatoren in J-R¨ aumen and einige Anwendungen auf die Schar L(λ) = λ2I + λb + c, Habilitationsschrift, Technische Universit¨ at Dresden, 1965

    1965

  25. [33]

    Spectral analysis of second order operators with sign-changing coefficients on general compact graphs, submitted 2024

    Nicaise, S. Spectral analysis of second order operators with sign-changing coefficients on general compact graphs, submitted 2024

    2024

  26. [34]

    Quasi-hermitian operators in quantum mechanics and the variational principle

    Scholtz, F., Geyer, H., and Hahne, F. Quasi-hermitian operators in quantum mechanics and the variational principle. Ann. Physics 1 , 213 (1992), 74–101. Edison Leguizamon, ej.leguizamon@uniandes.edu.co Monika Winklmeier, mwinklme@uniandes.edu.co Departamento de Matem´ aticas U...

    1992

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.