Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

The Chemical Clock of High-mass Star-forming Regions: N2H+/CCS

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A ratio of two interstellar molecules, N2H+ to CCS, rises steadily as high-mass star-forming regions evolve, making it a usable chemical clock for these objects.

desk verdict A genuinely new UC HII sample shows a N2H+/CCS stage trend, but the 'reliable clock' claim depends on an unverified Trot assumption and unpublished comparison data. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.23221 v1 pith:TT7KUY5T submitted 2025-05-29 astro-ph.GA

J. L. Chen , J. S. Zhang , J. X. Ge , Y. X. Wang , H. Z. Yu , Y. P. Zou , Y. T. Yan , X. Y. Wang
show 1 more author
D. Y. Wei
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords ISM:astrochemistrymoleculesGalaxy:evolutionabundanceradiolines:ISMchemicalclockN2H+/CCSratiohigh-massstar-formingregions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the column-density ratio of two molecules, N2H+ (diazenylium) and CCS (dicarbon sulfide), can serve as a reliable chemical clock for high-mass star-forming regions. The authors observed 88 ultracompact H II regions with the IRAM 30 m telescope and combined those results with published measurements of younger stages, finding that the average ratio increases from 23.6 in high-mass starless cores to 71.6 in high-mass protostellar cores to 129.9 in ultracompact H II regions. A gas-grain chemical model reproduces the same rise as the modeled age increases, with a total best-fit chemical age of about 86,000 years across the three stages. If the trend holds, the ratio gives astronomers a practical way to place a given massive star-forming region on an evolutionary sequence.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the ratio of column densities $N(\mathrm{N_2H^+})/N(\mathrm{CCS})$. N2H+ (diazenylium) and CCS (dicarbon sulfide) are both observed in the $J=1-0$ and $J_N=8_7-7_6$/$7_7-6_6$ rotational lines, and the ratio is built from LTE estimates of their column densities. The chemical rationale is that CCS forms early from carbon ions and atoms, while N2H+ forms later from N2, whose production is slow; hence the ratio should track chemical age. The same ratio is computed from a grid of gas-grain chemical models, and the observed average values at each stage are matched to model timescales to fix density, temperature, and chemical age.

What would settle it

Re-observe the 23 single-line CCS sources in the second CCS transition at 90.686 GHz and derive individual rotational temperatures; if the revised N(N2H+)/N(CCS) values drop into the protostellar-core range, the monotonic clock fails. A complementary check would measure the ratio in a sample whose evolutionary stage is independently known from outflow or maser activity.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery proposed is that N(N2H+)/N(CCS) grows monotonically as high-mass star-forming regions evolve from starless cores to protostellar cores to ultracompact H II regions. The growth is driven mainly by N2H+ column density increasing across the stages while the CCS column density stays roughly flat, so the ratio acts as a chemical age indicator rather than merely a density tracer. The paper supports this with a gas-grain chemical model in which N2H+ builds up later because it forms from N2, whose production is slow in cold clouds, while CCS is an early carbon-chain molecule that does not keep growing. The authors therefore propose the ratio as a reliable chemical clock of high-mass star-forming regions.

Load-bearing premise

For 23 of the 33 ultracompact H II regions with CCS detections, the CCS column density is computed using a single rotational temperature of 11.93 K averaged from the other ten sources, so if those regions are warmer the ratios at the oldest stage could shift downward.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The ratio provides an evolutionary ordering for high-mass star-forming regions without needing an independent distance or age estimate.
  • Sources that are hard to classify by morphology alone can be assigned to the starless-core, protostellar-core, or ultracompact-H II-region stage by comparing their ratio to the average values 23.6, 71.6, and 129.9.
  • The best-fit gas-grain models indicate a total chemical age of roughly 86,000 years from starless core to ultracompact H II region, consistent with independent estimates of the high-mass star formation timescale.
  • Because the rise is driven mainly by N2H+ rather than CCS, surveys that detect N2H+ but not CCS should tend to pick out the oldest, most evolved sources.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to compare the ratio with independent age tracers such as outflows, masers, or infrared luminosity in the same sources; overlap between tracers would test whether the ratio really measures age rather than local temperature or density.
  • The model's simplified uniform physical structure means the quoted chemical ages are order-of-magnitude estimates; spatially resolved chemical modeling of individual cores could sharpen the clock.
  • The same N2H+/CCS strategy could be tried in lower-mass star-forming regions or in extragalactic sources, where carbon-chain chemistry may differ, to see whether the monotonic rise is universal.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports IRAM 30 m observations of N2H+ J=1-0, CCS JN=87-76 and 77-66 toward 88 ultracompact H II regions (UC HIIs), detecting N2H+ in 87 sources and CCS 87-76 in 33 sources, with 10 of 82 targeted sources detected in CCS 77-66. The authors derive optical depths, excitation/rotational temperatures, and column densities, then combine their UC HII measurements with archival data for high-mass starless cores (HMSCs) and high-mass protostellar cores (HMPOs) to show that the column density ratio N(N2H+)/N(CCS) increases from HMSCs (average 23.6) to HMPOs (71.6) to UC HIIs (129.9), supported by K-S and t-tests. A gas-grain chemical model is used to interpret the ratio as an evolutionary clock, yielding best-fit physical parameters and ages for each stage. The paper concludes that N(N2H+)/N(CCS) is a reliable chemical evolutionary indicator for high-mass star-forming regions.

Significance. If the empirical trend is robust, the ratio provides a practical age-ordering tracer for high-mass star-forming regions, complementing existing chemical clocks such as HC3N/N2H+. The paper's strengths include a large, homogeneously observed UC HII sample, explicit error bars, statistical testing, a public modeling code (GGCHEMPY), and a check for distance-dependent beam bias within the UC HII sample. The main concerns are that the CCS column density for the majority of UC HII detections relies on an assumed rotational temperature, part of the comparison sample comes from an unpublished companion paper, and the three evolutionary stages were observed with different telescopes and beam sizes. These issues affect the load-bearing claim that the ratio cleanly separates the three stages and can serve as a reliable clock.

major comments (4)
  1. [4.1, Table 5] For 23 of the 33 UC HII sources with CCS 87-76 detections, the CCS column density is computed from a single line using the mean rotational temperature of the 10 two-line detections, Trot = 11.93 ± 5.72 K. The derived N(CCS) is highly sensitive to Trot through Eq. (7): at Trot = 5 K, which is within the measured range (4.88-24.65 K), N(CCS) is about 4.3 times larger than at 11.93 K, lowering N(N2H+)/N(CCS) by the same factor. The 23 single-line sources are exactly those without a detected 77-66 line, which is the signature of lower excitation temperature, so the assumed value likely biases the UC HII ratio upward. Since Table 6 shows that the HMPO-UC HII separation (71.60 vs 129.93) is the key discriminator, this systematic uncertainty could erase the claimed evolutionary trend. The authors should present a sensitivity test (e.g., recomputing all single-line CCS column densities at Trot = 5 K and repeating the K-S and t-tests) or restrict the cross-stage comparison to the 10 sources with measured Trot to demonstrate that the ordering survives.
  2. [4.1, beam matching] The comparison samples include eight HMSC and seven HMPO sources from 'Chen et al. 2025 (in prep.)' observed with the ARO 12 m telescope; these data are not available in the manuscript, in an appendix, or in a public archive. The physical parameters listed in Table 5 for these sources cannot be independently verified, and the K-S/t-test results in Table 6 include these unpublished points. The authors should either make the line intensities and spectra available as supplementary material or repeat the statistical analysis without these sources to show that the monotonic trend is not driven solely by the unpublished subset.
  3. [4.2, Eq. (8)] The three evolutionary stages are observed with different telescopes and beam sizes: IRAM 30 m (~27''), Nobeyama 45 m (~17''), and ARO 12 m (~66''). The statement in Section 4.1 that beam dilution effects are 'non-significant' assumes that N2H+ and CCS have identical spatial distributions within the beam. However, Section 3.3.2 itself notes that CCS emission is clumpy and distributed differently from N2H+, and the distance test in Figure 5 is applied only to the UC HII sample and does not control for cross-sample beam differences. If the two tracers have different effective source sizes, the observed ratio becomes beam-dependent, and the stage-to-stage comparison could be biased. The authors should quantify this effect, for instance by convolving all data to a common angular resolution or by modeling beam-filling corrections for each tracer and showing that the ratio ordering between the three stages remains unchanged.
  4. [4.2, Table 8] The gas-grain chemical model is presented as support for the clock, but the model parameters (density, temperature, and chemical age) are optimized for each stage using Eq. (8) to match the observed column densities of N2H+ and CCS, and the initial abundances for later stages are taken from the best-fit model of the preceding stage. The increasing modeled ratio in Figure 8 is therefore partly a consequence of the fitting procedure rather than an independent prediction of the model. The text should be revised to describe the model as a consistency check that can reproduce the trend with plausible parameters, not as independent confirmation that the ratio is a reliable clock. The best-fit ages in Table 8 should be presented with this caveat clearly stated.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Summary vs Section 4.2] There is an inconsistency in the total chemical age: Section 5 (item 4) states 83,913 years, while the three best-fit timescales in Table 8 sum to 19,179 + 32,990 + 34,286 = 86,455 years. Please reconcile these numbers.
  2. [Appendix C, Eq. (C1)] Equation (C1) appears to be typeset incorrectly: the summation notation 'nX i=2' is garbled and the limits are not legible. Please correct the equation so that the shell-averaging procedure is clear.
  3. [Throughout] The manuscript contains numerous typographical spacing errors, particularly in molecular formulas (e.g., 'N 2H+' instead of 'N2H+') and table headers (e.g., 'T able' instead of 'Table'). These should be corrected in the final version.
  4. [Section 3.3.2] The sentence 'For those six sources without observed in CCS (JN = 77−66) line' should be rephrased, for example as 'For the six sources that were not observed in the CCS JN = 77−66 line.'

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Observed N2H+/CCS stage trend is independent, but the chemical-model 'support' is fitted to the same column densities and is a consistency check, not an independent prediction.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4.2, Eq. (8), Table 8, Figure 8]
    "the agreement at each time step between the modeled column density Ni(t) and the observed column density Nobs,i(t) is quantified by the confidence level κi(t)... An iterative search was then performed to find the maximum total κ(t) value, representing the best-fit evolutionary time under the best-fit model. ... The modeled results show a similar trend with our measured results, i.e., increasing ratio of N(N2H+)/N(CCS) from HMSC, HMPO to UC HII stages. This support the reliability of N(N2H+)/N(CCS) as a chemical clock."

    The best-fit density, temperature, and age for each evolutionary stage are chosen by maximizing agreement between modeled Ni(t) and observed Nobs,i(t) for N2H+ and CCS. The subsequent model curve of N(N2H+)/N(CCS) versus evolution age is therefore matched to the observed abundances (and hence the observed ratio) at the fitted stage ages; the 'similar trend' in Figure 8 is a property of the fitting, not an independent model prediction. The model provides a self-consistency check, but it cannot independently confirm the clock because the quantity it is said to predict is the same one used as the fitting target.

full rationale

The observed N(N2H+)/N(CCS) trend across HMSC, HMPO, and UC HII samples is built from independent line measurements (this paper's IRAM data plus Fontani et al. and Taniguchi et al.), so the central empirical claim is not circular. The fixed Trot=11.93 K adoption for 23 UC HII single-line sources is a robustness concern, not a definitional circularity. The main circular element is in Section 4.2: the gas-grain model is presented as supporting the clock, but its best-fit density, temperature, and age per stage are optimized against the observed N2H+ and CCS column densities, and the modeled ratio-versus-age curve is then compared with the same observed averages. This is a self-consistency check and not an independent prediction; it should not be cited as independent model support. The 'Chen et al. 2025, in prep.' self-citation supplies some HMSC/HMPO data points, but the stage trend does not depend on those data alone, so it is not load-bearing. Overall, the empirical clock claim has independent content, but the model corroboration is partially circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 11 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central ratio trend comes from observations, but the derived N(CCS) values depend on the optically thin LTE assumption and a single Trot value for most UC HII sources, and the chemical model support depends on a reaction network, initial abundances, and physical parameter choices that are adopted rather than derived. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (11)
  • CCS rotational temperature (Trot) for single-line sources = 11.93 K (average of 10 two-line detections)
    Applied to 23 UC HII sources with only CCS 87-76 detection to estimate N(CCS); potential systematic bias if true Trot differs.
  • Chemical age of HMSC stage = 19,179 yr
    Best-fit time maximizing agreement between GGCHEMPY output and observed N(N2H+) and N(CCS) for the HMSC sample.
  • Chemical age of HMPO stage = 32,990 yr
    Best-fit time for the HMPO stage in the chemical model.
  • Chemical age of UC HII stage = 34,286 yr
    Best-fit time for the UC HII stage in the chemical model.
  • Best-fit gas density for HMSC = 7.78e5 cm^-3
    Fit parameter in the chemical model grid for the HMSC stage.
  • Best-fit gas density for HMPO = 4.50e5 cm^-3
    Fit parameter in the chemical model grid for the HMPO stage.
  • Best-fit gas density for UC HII = 4.30e5 cm^-3
    Fit parameter in the chemical model grid for the UC HII stage.
  • Best-fit temperature for HMSC = 24.5 K
    Fit parameter in the chemical model grid for the HMSC stage.
  • Best-fit temperature for HMPO = 103.7 K
    Fit parameter in the chemical model grid for the HMPO stage.
  • Best-fit temperature for UC HII = 110.5 K
    Fit parameter in the chemical model grid for the UC HII stage.
  • Line-of-sight thickness for model column density = 1 pc
    Assumed in Appendix C to convert modeled abundances to column densities.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption CCS emission is optically thin and in LTE, allowing the rotational diagram method
    Section 3.3.2: supports derivation of Trot and N(CCS). Low Tmb (<0.24 K) is cited, but optical depth is not directly measured.
  • domain assumption N2H+ hyperfine components share equal excitation temperature and line width
    Section 3.3.1: required for the intensity ratio optical depth method.
  • domain assumption Semenov et al. (2010) gas-grain reaction network accurately describes high-mass star-forming region chemistry
    Section 4.2: the GGCHEMPY model relies on this network.
  • domain assumption Initial elemental abundances from Gerner et al. (2014) are appropriate for HMSC, HMPO, and UC HII stages
    Table 7: used to initialize the chemical model.
  • domain assumption The three samples (HMSC, HMPO, UC HII) represent an evolutionary sequence with similar initial conditions
    Section 4.1: if density, temperature, or beam size differences drive the ratio rather than age, the clock interpretation fails.
  • domain assumption Fixed cosmic-ray ionization rate, visual extinction, and gas-to-dust ratio (5e-17 s^-1, 10 mag, 100)
    Section 4.2: set from literature, not varied in the fit.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Chemical Clock of High-mass Star-forming Regions: N2H+/CCS." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TT7KUY5T

@misc{pith2026250523221,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Chemical Clock of High-mass Star-forming Regions: N2H+/CCS},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TT7KUY5T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.23221}
}
read the original abstract

Using the IRAM 30 m telescope, we presented observations of N2H+ J = 1-0, CCS JN = 87-76 and 77-66 lines toward a large sample of ultracompact HII regions (UC HIIs). Among our 88 UC HIIs, 87 and 33 sources were detected in the N2H+ J = 1-0 and CCS JN = 87-76 lines, respectively. For the CCS 77-66 transition, we detected emission in 10 out of 82 targeted sources, all of which also exhibited emission in the CCS JN = 87-76 line. Physical parameters are derived for our detections, including the optical depth and excitation temperature of N2H+, the rotational temperature of CCS and the column density. Combining our results and previous observation results in different stages of high-mass star-forming regions (HMSFRs), we found that the column density ratio N(N2H+)/N(CCS) increases from high-mass starless cores (HMSCs) through high-mass protostellar cores (HMPOs) to UC HIIs. This implies that N(N2H+)/N(CCS) can trace the evolution process of HMSFRs. It was supported by our gas-grain chemical model, which shows that N(N2H+)/N(CCS) increases with the evolution age of HMSFRs. The temperature, density and chemical age were also constrained from our best-fit model at each stage. Thus, we propose N(N2H+)/N(CCS) as a reliable chemical clock of HMSFRs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.23221 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Synthetic N2H + J = 1−0 spectra for an intrinsic velocity dispersion of 0.6 km s−1 and a Gaussian line shape [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The spectra of N2H + J = 1−0 (top panels), CCS JN = 87 − 76 (middle panels) and CCS JN = 77 − 66 (bottom panels) of our UC HII sample observed by the IRAM 30 m telescope. For those detections, Green gaussian fit lines were presented. For those six sources that were not observed in CCS JN = 77 − 66 line, the corresponding panels are blank [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (Continued.) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Two panels show the comparison of the line width between CCS JN = 87 − 76 and 77 − 66 and N2H + J = 1−0. The black dashed line means that both lines have the same line width [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Rotational diagrams of CCS for sources with CCS (JN = 87 − 76) and CCS (JN = 77 − 66) line detections [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: N(N2H +)/N(CCS) against the heliocentric distance; no significant variation can be found between them. N(N2H+)/N(CCS) ratio significantly increases from HMSCs to HMPOs and further to UC HII regions. The increasing N(N2H+)/N(CCS) ratio may be attributed to the rise in N…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The cumulative distributions for N(N2H +)/N(CCS) (a), N(N2H +) (b) and N(CCS) (c) for HMSCs, HMPOs, and UC HIIs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The N(N2H +)/N(CCS) ratio is plotted against the N(N2H +) and the histograms of the x-axis and y-axis on the top and right panel for the three groups (HMSC, HMPO, UC HII) are showed. Sources at three stages can be divided distinctly and a strong correlation between the…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The modeled column density for N2H + (a) and CCS (b), and their ratio (c) from our best-fit models were plotted as a function of the age for HMSC, HMPO and UC HII stages (solid lines with dashed lines for standard deviation). Those dotted lines show the average values …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The comparison of the optical depth from the intensity ratio and HF fitting method. Sources with only N2H + detection are in solid black circle, while sources with both N2H + and CCS detections are in solid red circle. The black dashed line means that both optical dept…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Chemistry of Dark Molecular Clouds

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A comprehensive review arguing that the chemically rich cores TMC-1 CP and L1544 are representative molecular-cloud laboratories, and that complex organic molecule production is largely insensitive to metallicity.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    bh<Etխӫ

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    2021

  4. [4]

    2015, , 807, 120, 10.1088/0004-637X/807/2/120

    Aikawa , Y., Furuya , K., Nomura , H., & Qi , C. 2015, , 807, 120, 10.1088/0004-637X/807/2/120

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/807/2/120 2015

  5. [5]

    2003, , 593, 906, 10.1086/376616

    Aikawa , Y., Ohashi , N., & Herbst , E. 2003, , 593, 906, 10.1086/376616

    doi:10.1086/376616 2003

  6. [6]

    2001, , 552, 639, 10.1086/320551

    Aikawa , Y., Ohashi , N., Inutsuka , S.-i., Herbst , E., & Takakuwa , S. 2001, , 552, 639, 10.1086/320551

    doi:10.1086/320551 2001

  7. [7]

    B., McKee , C

    Beuther , H., Churchwell , E. B., McKee , C. F., & Tan , J. C. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth , D. Jewitt , & K. Keil , 165, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0602012

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0602012 2007

  8. [8]

    2010, , 518, L78, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014532

    Beuther , H., Henning , T., Linz , H., et al. 2010, , 518, L78, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014532

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014532 2010

Show all 123 references
  1. [9]

    M., et al

    Beuther , H., Schilke , P., Menten , K. M., et al. 2002, , 566, 945, 10.1086/338334

    2002 doi

  2. [10]

    2012, , 20, 56, 10.1007/s00159-012-0056-x

    Caselli , P., & Ceccarelli , C. 2012, , 20, 56, 10.1007/s00159-012-0056-x

    2012 doi

  3. [11]

    M., & Zhang , Q

    Cesaroni , R., Galli , D., Lodato , G., Walmsley , C. M., & Zhang , Q. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth , D. Jewitt , & K. Keil , 197, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0603093

    2007 doi arXiv

  4. [12]

    T., et al

    Cesaroni , R., Pestalozzi , M., Beltr \'a n , M. T., et al. 2015, , 579, A71, 10.1051/0004-6361/201525953

    2015 doi

  5. [13]

    L., Zhang , J

    Chen , J. L., Zhang , J. S., Henkel , C., et al. 2021, , 257, 39, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac205a

    2021 doi

  6. [14]

    2024, , 971, 164, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5549

    ---. 2024, , 971, 164, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5549

    2024 doi

  7. [15]

    2002, , 40, 27, 10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093845

    Churchwell , E. 2002, , 40, 27, 10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093845

    2002

  8. [16]

    T., Cesaroni , R., & Moscadelli , L

    Codella , C., Lorenzani , A., Gallego , A. T., Cesaroni , R., & Moscadelli , L. 2004, , 417, 615, 10.1051/0004-6361:20035608

    2004 doi

  9. [17]

    S., Schuller , F., et al

    Csengeri , T., Urquhart , J. S., Schuller , F., et al. 2014, , 565, A75, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322434

    2014 doi

  10. [18]

    O., Thompson , M

    Djordjevic , J. O., Thompson , M. A., Urquhart , J. S., & Forbrich , J. 2019, , 487, 1057, 10.1093/mnras/stz1262

    2019 doi

  11. [19]

    K., Rosolowsky , E., Evans , Neal J., I., Cyganowski , C., & Urquhart , J

    Dunham , M. K., Rosolowsky , E., Evans , Neal J., I., Cyganowski , C., & Urquhart , J. S. 2011, , 741, 110, 10.1088/0004-637X/741/2/110

    2011 doi

  12. [20]

    E., Williams , R

    Dyson , J. E., Williams , R. J. R., & Redman , M. P. 1995, , 277, 700, 10.1093/mnras/277.2.700

    1995 doi

  13. [21]

    A., Rodr \' guez , L

    Dzib , S. A., Rodr \' guez , L. F., Medina , S. N. X., et al. 2014, , 567, L5, 10.1051/0004-6361/201423855

    2014 doi

  14. [22]

    Ellingsen , S. P. 2006, , 638, 241, 10.1086/498673

    2006 doi

  15. [23]

    2021, , 73, 467, 10.1093/pasj/psab012

    Feng , H., Wang , J., Li , S., et al. 2021, , 73, 467, 10.1093/pasj/psab012

    2021 doi

  16. [24]

    2023, , 680, A58, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347565

    Fontani , F., Roueff , E., Colzi , L., & Caselli , P. 2023, , 680, A58, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347565

    2023 doi

  17. [25]

    2011, , 529, L7, 10.1051/0004-6361/201116631

    Fontani , F., Palau , A., Caselli , P., et al. 2011, , 529, L7, 10.1051/0004-6361/201116631

    2011 doi

  18. [26]

    T., Wakelam , V., & Herbst , E

    Garrod , R. T., Wakelam , V., & Herbst , E. 2007, , 467, 1103, 10.1051/0004-6361:20066704

    2007 doi

  19. [27]

    2022, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 22, 015004, 10.1088/1674-4527/ac321e

    Ge , J. 2022, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 22, 015004, 10.1088/1674-4527/ac321e

    2022 doi

  20. [28]

    2014, , 563, A97, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322541

    Gerner , T., Beuther , H., Semenov , D., et al. 2014, , 563, A97, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322541

    2014 doi

  21. [29]

    L., Beuther , H., et al

    Gerner , T., Shirley , Y. L., Beuther , H., et al. 2015, , 579, A80, 10.1051/0004-6361/201423989

    2015 doi

  22. [30]

    H., Helfand , D

    Giveon , U., Becker , R. H., Helfand , D. J., & White , R. L. 2005 a , , 129, 348, 10.1086/426360

    2005 doi

  23. [31]

    2005 b , , 130, 156, 10.1086/430459

    ---. 2005 b , , 130, 156, 10.1086/430459

    2005 doi

  24. [32]

    F., & Langer , W

    Goldsmith , P. F., & Langer , W. D. 1999, , 517, 209, 10.1086/307195

    1999 doi

  25. [33]

    Grave , J. M. C., & Kumar , M. S. N. 2009, , 498, 147, 10.1051/0004-6361/200810902

    2009 doi

  26. [34]

    2000, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Guilloteau , S., & Lucas , R. 2000, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 217, Imaging at Radio through Submillimeter Wavelengths, ed. J. G. Mangum & S. J. E. Radford , 299

    2000

  27. [35]

    E., Guzm \'a n , V

    Guzm \'a n , A. E., Guzm \'a n , V. V., Garay , G., Bronfman , L., & Hechenleitner , F. 2018, , 236, 45, 10.3847/1538-4365/aac01d

    2018 doi

  28. [36]

    H., Zhou , J

    Han , X. H., Zhou , J. J., Wang , J. Z., et al. 2015, , 576, A131, 10.1051/0004-6361/201423791

    2015 doi

  29. [37]

    I., & Herbst , E

    Hasegawa , T. I., & Herbst , E. 1993, , 261, 83, 10.1093/mnras/261.1.83

    1993 doi

  30. [38]

    I., Herbst , E., & Leung , C

    Hasegawa , T. I., Herbst , E., & Leung , C. M. 1992, , 82, 167, 10.1086/191713

    1992 doi

  31. [39]

    E., Harada , N., & Herbst , E

    Hassel , G. E., Harada , N., & Herbst , E. 2011, , 743, 182, 10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/182

    2011 doi

  32. [40]

    E., Herbst , E., & Garrod , R

    Hassel , G. E., Herbst , E., & Garrod , R. T. 2008, , 681, 1385, 10.1086/588185

    2008 doi

  33. [41]

    A., Millar , T

    Hatchell , J., Thompson , M. A., Millar , T. J., & MacDonald , G. H. 1998, , 133, 29, 10.1051/aas:1998309

    1998 doi

  34. [42]

    N., Pinte , C., et al

    Hill , T., Longmore , S. N., Pinte , C., et al. 2010, , 402, 2682, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16101.x

    2010

  35. [43]

    G., Purcell , C

    Hoare , M. G., Purcell , C. R., Churchwell , E. B., et al. 2012, , 124, 939, 10.1086/668058

    2012 doi

  36. [44]

    M., Foster , J

    Hoq , S., Jackson , J. M., Foster , J. B., et al. 2013, , 777, 157, 10.1088/0004-637X/777/2/157

    2013 doi

  37. [45]

    S., et al

    Hsieh , T.-H., Takami , M., Connelley , M. S., et al. 2021, , 912, 108, 10.3847/1538-4357/abee88

    2021 doi

  38. [46]

    M., Wu , Y., et al

    Hu , B., Menten , K. M., Wu , Y., et al. 2016, , 833, 18, 10.3847/0004-637X/833/1/18

    2016 doi

  39. [47]

    G., Burton , M., et al

    Irabor , T., Hoare , M. G., Burton , M., et al. 2023, , 520, 1073, 10.1093/mnras/stad005

    2023 doi

  40. [48]

    I., Caselli , P., et al

    Jim \'e nez-Serra , I., Vasyunin , A. I., Caselli , P., et al. 2016, , 830, L6, 10.3847/2041-8205/830/1/L6

    2016 doi

  41. [49]

    2015, , 219, 2, 10.1088/0067-0049/219/1/2

    Jin , M., Lee , J.-E., & Kim , K.-T. 2015, , 219, 2, 10.1088/0067-0049/219/1/2

    2015 doi

  42. [50]

    K., Belloche , A., & Garrod , R

    J rgensen , J. K., Belloche , A., & Garrod , R. T. 2020, , 58, 727, 10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021927

    2020 doi

  43. [51]

    E., Hoare , M

    Kalcheva , I. E., Hoare , M. G., Urquhart , J. S., et al. 2018, , 615, A103, 10.1051/0004-6361/201832734

    2018 doi

  44. [52]

    C., & Evans , N

    Kennicutt , R. C., & Evans , N. J. 2012, , 50, 531, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610

    2012 doi

  45. [53]

    D., Lal , D

    Khan , S., Pandian , J. D., Lal , D. V., et al. 2022, , 664, A140, 10.1051/0004-6361/202140914

    2022 doi

  46. [54]

    R., Bate , M

    Krumholz , M. R., Bate , M. R., Arce , H. G., et al. 2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed. H. Beuther , R. S. Klessen , C. P. Dullemond , & T. Henning , 243--266, 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch011

    2014 doi

  47. [55]

    Kuiper , T. B. H., Langer , W. D., & Velusamy , T. 1996, , 468, 761, 10.1086/177732

    1996 doi

  48. [56]

    J., Bergin , E

    Lada , C. J., Bergin , E. A., Alves , J. F., & Huard , T. L. 2003, , 586, 286, 10.1086/367610

    2003 doi

  49. [57]

    H., Herbst , E., Pineau des Forets , G., Roueff , E., & Le Bourlot , J

    Lee , H. H., Herbst , E., Pineau des Forets , G., Roueff , E., & Le Bourlot , J. 1996, , 311, 690

    1996

  50. [58]

    A., Henkel , C., Reimers , D., & Wang , M

    Levshakov , S. A., Henkel , C., Reimers , D., & Wang , M. 2014, , 567, A78, 10.1051/0004-6361/201423732

    2014 doi

  51. [59]

    2016, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 16, 47, 10.1088/1674-4527/16/3/047

    Li , H.-K., Zhang , J.-S., Liu , Z.-W., et al. 2016, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 16, 47, 10.1088/1674-4527/16/3/047

    2016 doi

  52. [60]

    C., Wu , Y., Zhang , C., et al

    Liu , X. C., Wu , Y., Zhang , C., et al. 2019, , 622, A32, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834411

    2019 doi

  53. [61]

    Lu , X., Mills , E. A. C., Ginsburg , A., et al. 2019, , 244, 35, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab4258

    2019 doi

  54. [62]

    G., & Shirley , Y

    Mangum , J. G., & Shirley , Y. L. 2015, , 127, 266, 10.1086/680323

    2015 doi

  55. [63]

    Martins , M. A. P. 1996, General Relativity and Gravitation, 28, 1309, 10.1007/BF02109523

    1996 doi

  56. [64]

    F., & Ostriker , E

    McKee , C. F., & Ostriker , E. C. 2007, , 45, 565, 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110602

    2007 arXiv

  57. [65]

    F., & Tan , J

    McKee , C. F., & Tan , J. C. 2003, , 585, 850, 10.1086/346149

    2003 doi

  58. [66]

    2018, , 56, 41, 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055235

    Motte , F., Bontemps , S., & Louvet , F. 2018, , 56, 41, 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055235

    2018 doi

  59. [67]

    J., & Charnley , S

    Mumma , M. J., & Charnley , S. B. 2011, , 49, 471, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130811

    2011 doi

  60. [68]

    I., & Bergin , E

    \"O berg , K. I., & Bergin , E. A. 2021, , 893, 1, 10.1016/j.physrep.2020.09.004

    2021 doi

  61. [69]

    2014, , 66, 119, 10.1093/pasj/psu116

    Ohashi , S., Tatematsu , K., Choi , M., et al. 2014, , 66, 119, 10.1093/pasj/psu116

    2014 doi

  62. [70]

    M., et al

    Palau , A., Estalella , R., Girart , J. M., et al. 2007, , 465, 219, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065936

    2007 doi

  63. [71]

    L., Urquhart , J

    Patel , A. L., Urquhart , J. S., Yang , A. Y., et al. 2023, , 524, 4384, 10.1093/mnras/stad2143

    2023 doi

  64. [72]

    D., Egan , M

    Price , S. D., Egan , M. P., Carey , S. J., Mizuno , D. R., & Kuchar , T. A. 2001, , 121, 2819, 10.1086/320404

    2001 doi

  65. [73]

    R., Longmore , S

    Purcell , C. R., Longmore , S. N., Burton , M. G., et al. 2009, , 394, 323, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14283.x

    2009

  66. [74]

    R., Hoare , M

    Purcell , C. R., Hoare , M. G., Cotton , W. D., et al. 2013, , 205, 1, 10.1088/0067-0049/205/1/1

    2013 doi

  67. [75]

    M., Jackson , J

    Rathborne , J. M., Jackson , J. M., & Simon , R. 2006, , 641, 389, 10.1086/500423

    2006 doi

  68. [76]

    J., Menten , K

    Reid , M. J., Menten , K. M., Brunthaler , A., et al. 2014, , 783, 130, 10.1088/0004-637X/783/2/130

    2014 doi

  69. [77]

    2019, , 885, 131, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4a11

    ---. 2019, , 885, 131, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4a11

    2019 doi

  70. [78]

    2007, , 663, 1174, 10.1086/518595

    Sakai , N., Ikeda , M., Morita , M., et al. 2007, , 663, 1174, 10.1086/518595

    2007 doi

  71. [79]

    2010, , 714, 1658, 10.1088/0004-637X/714/2/1658

    Sakai , T., Sakai , N., Hirota , T., & Yamamoto , S. 2010, , 714, 1658, 10.1088/0004-637X/714/2/1658

    2010 doi

  72. [80]

    M., Foster , J

    Sanhueza , P., Jackson , J. M., Foster , J. B., et al. 2012, , 756, 60, 10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/60

    2012 doi

  73. [81]

    2013, , 773, 123, 10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/123

    ---. 2013, , 773, 123, 10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/123

    2013 doi

  74. [82]

    M., Contreras , Y., et al

    Schuller , F., Menten , K. M., Contreras , Y., et al. 2009, , 504, 415, 10.1051/0004-6361/200811568

    2009 doi

  75. [83]

    2010, , 522, A42, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015149

    Semenov , D., Hersant , F., Wakelam , V., et al. 2010, , 522, A42, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015149

    2010 doi

  76. [84]

    2015, , 578, A55, 10.1051/0004-6361/201424364

    Sipil \"a , O., Caselli , P., & Harju , J. 2015, , 578, A55, 10.1051/0004-6361/201424364

    2015 doi

  77. [85]

    2022, , 258, 19, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac348e

    Song , S.-M., Chen , X., Shen , Z.-Q., et al. 2022, , 258, 19, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac348e

    2022 doi

  78. [86]

    K., Beuther , H., Saito , M., Wyrowski , F., & Schilke , P

    Sridharan , T. K., Beuther , H., Saito , M., Wyrowski , F., & Schilke , P. 2005, , 634, L57, 10.1086/498644

    2005 doi

  79. [87]

    K., Beuther , H., Schilke , P., Menten , K

    Sridharan , T. K., Beuther , H., Schilke , P., Menten , K. M., & Wyrowski , F. 2002, , 566, 931, 10.1086/338332

    2002 doi

  80. [88]

    E., Shirley , Y

    Svoboda , B. E., Shirley , Y. L., Battersby , C., et al. 2016, , 822, 59, 10.3847/0004-637X/822/2/59

    2016 doi

  81. [89]

    C., Beltr \'a n , M

    Tan , J. C., Beltr \'a n , M. T., Caselli , P., et al. 2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed. H. Beuther , R. S. Klessen , C. P. Dullemond , & T. Henning , 149--172, 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch007

    2014 doi

  82. [90]

    D., Henkel , C., Wyrowski , F., et al

    Tang , X. D., Henkel , C., Wyrowski , F., et al. 2018, , 611, A6, 10.1051/0004-6361/201732168

    2018 doi

  83. [91]

    K., & Minamidani , T

    Taniguchi , K., Saito , M., Sridharan , T. K., & Minamidani , T. 2019, , 872, 154, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab001e

    2019 doi

  84. [92]

    2010, , 62, 1473, 10.1093/pasj/62.6.1473

    Tatematsu , K., Hirota , T., Kandori , R., & Umemoto , T. 2010, , 62, 1473, 10.1093/pasj/62.6.1473

    2010 doi

  85. [93]

    2017, , 228, 12, 10.3847/1538-4365/228/2/12

    Tatematsu , K., Liu , T., Ohashi , S., et al. 2017, , 228, 12, 10.3847/1538-4365/228/2/12

    2017 doi

  86. [94]

    A., Hatchell , J., Walsh , A

    Thompson , M. A., Hatchell , J., Walsh , A. J., MacDonald , G. H., & Millar , T. J. 2006, , 453, 1003, 10.1051/0004-6361:20054383

    2006 doi

  87. [96]

    S., Busfield , A

    Urquhart , J. S., Busfield , A. L., Hoare , M. G., et al. 2007, , 461, 11, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065837

    2007 doi

  88. [97]

    S., Hoare , M

    Urquhart , J. S., Hoare , M. G., Purcell , C. R., et al. 2009, , 501, 539, 10.1051/0004-6361/200912108

    2009 doi

  89. [98]

    S., Morgan , L

    Urquhart , J. S., Morgan , L. K., Figura , C. C., et al. 2011, , 418, 1689, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19594.x

    2011

  90. [99]

    S., Thompson , M

    Urquhart , J. S., Thompson , M. A., Moore , T. J. T., et al. 2013, , 435, 400, 10.1093/mnras/stt1310

    2013 doi

  91. [100]

    S., Wells , M

    Urquhart , J. S., Wells , M. R. A., Pillai , T., et al. 2022, , 510, 3389, 10.1093/mnras/stab3511

    2022 doi

  92. [101]

    van Dishoeck , E. F. 2018, IAU Symposium, 332, 3, 10.1017/S1743921317011528

    2018 doi

  93. [102]

    Vastel , C., Spaans , M., Ceccarelli , C., Tielens , A. G. G. M., & Caux , E. 2001, , 376, 1064, 10.1051/0004-6361:20011032

    2001 doi

  94. [103]

    2011, , 527, A88, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014974

    Vasyunina , T., Linz , H., Henning , T., et al. 2011, , 527, A88, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014974

    2011 doi

  95. [104]

    I., Herbst , E., & Linz , H

    Vasyunina , T., Vasyunin , A. I., Herbst , E., & Linz , H. 2012, , 751, 105, 10.1088/0004-637X/751/2/105

    2012 doi

  96. [105]

    2004, , 422, 159, 10.1051/0004-6361:20047186

    Wakelam , V., Caselli , P., Ceccarelli , C., Herbst , E., & Castets , A. 2004, , 422, 159, 10.1051/0004-6361:20047186

    2004 doi

  97. [106]

    2019, , 622, A185, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834276

    Wang , Y., Chang , Q., & Wang , H. 2019, , 622, A185, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834276

    2019 doi

  98. [107]

    2021, , 648, A72, 10.1051/0004-6361/202140411

    Wang , Y., Du , F., Semenov , D., Wang , H., & Li , J. 2021, , 648, A72, 10.1051/0004-6361/202140411

    2021 doi

  99. [108]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.18819, 10.48550/arXiv.2502.18819

    Wang , Y., Du , F., Wang , Y., Wang , H., & Zhang , J. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.18819, 10.48550/arXiv.2502.18819

    2025 doi arXiv

  100. [109]

    X., Zhang , J

    Wang , Y. X., Zhang , J. S., Yu , H. Z., et al. 2023, , 264, 48, 10.3847/1538-4365/acafe6

    2023 doi

  101. [110]

    P., Bhattal , A

    Whitworth , A. P., Bhattal , A. S., Chapman , S. J., Disney , M. J., & Turner , J. A. 1994, , 268, 291, 10.1093/mnras/268.1.291

    1994 doi

  102. [111]

    Wood , D. O. S., & Churchwell , E. 1989, , 69, 831, 10.1086/191329

    1989 doi

  103. [112]

    A., Li , D., et al

    Xie , J., Fuller , G. A., Li , D., et al. 2021, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 64, 279511, 10.1007/s11433-021-1695-0

    2021 doi

  104. [113]

    2017, Introduction to Astrochemistry: Chemical Evolution from Interstellar Clouds to Star and Planet Formation , 10.1007/978-4-431-54171-4

    Yamamoto , S. 2017, Introduction to Astrochemistry: Chemical Evolution from Interstellar Clouds to Star and Planet Formation , 10.1007/978-4-431-54171-4

    2017 doi

  105. [114]

    T., Zhang , J

    Yan , Y. T., Zhang , J. S., Henkel , C., et al. 2019, , 877, 154, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab17d6

    2019 doi

  106. [115]

    T., Henkel , C., Kobayashi , C., et al

    Yan , Y. T., Henkel , C., Kobayashi , C., et al. 2023, , 670, A98, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244584

    2023 doi

  107. [116]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2312.12261, 10.48550/arXiv.2312.12261

    Yang , K., Wang , J., Qiu , K., & Zhang , T. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2312.12261, 10.48550/arXiv.2312.12261

    2023 doi arXiv

  108. [117]

    Z., Zhang , J

    Yu , H. Z., Zhang , J. S., Henkel , C., et al. 2020, , 899, 145, 10.3847/1538-4357/aba8f1

    2020 doi

  109. [118]

    2015, , 451, 2507, 10.1093/mnras/stv1058

    Yu , N., & Wang , J.-J. 2015, , 451, 2507, 10.1093/mnras/stv1058

    2015 doi

  110. [119]

    P., et al

    Yuan , J., Wu , Y., Ellingsen , S. P., et al. 2017, , 231, 11, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa7204

    2017 doi

  111. [120]

    S., Sun , L

    Zhang , J. S., Sun , L. L., Riquelme , D., et al. 2015, , 219, 28, 10.1088/0067-0049/219/2/28

    2015 doi

  112. [121]

    S., Liu , W., Yan , Y

    Zhang , J. S., Liu , W., Yan , Y. T., et al. 2020, , 249, 6, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab9112

    2020 doi

  113. [122]

    Y., Zhang , J

    Zhao , J. Y., Zhang , J. S., Wang , Y. X., et al. 2023, , 266, 29, 10.3847/1538-4365/acc323

    2023 doi

  114. [123]

    Zinnecker , H., & Yorke , H. W. 2007, , 45, 481, 10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092549

    2007 arXiv

  115. [124]

    P., Zhang , J

    Zou , Y. P., Zhang , J. S., Henkel , C., et al. 2023, , 268, 56, 10.3847/1538-4365/acee6b

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.