Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 30 references

Eulers Horizonte -- M\"oglichkeiten und Grenzen seiner Arbeitsweise in der Mathematik

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that Euler's working style—proceeding from concrete examples by formal analogy, publishing partial results and failures—explains both how far his mathematics reached and exactly where it stopped, and it corrects his…

desk verdict A serious, well-documented study of Euler's working style with a correct mathematical correction at its core; the limit-claims lean too heavily on absence of published proofs, but the book deserves real review. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.23286 v1 pith:O3PLEHLB submitted 2025-05-29 math.HO

Alexander Aycock This is my paper
classification math.HO MSC 01A5039A06
keywords EulerhistoryofmathematicsdifferenceequationsStirlingformulamathematicalworkingstyleformalmethodsdivergentseries18th-centuryanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Euler's mathematics, on this account, is best understood through how he worked, not just what he found. The paper argues that Euler deliberately exposed his discovery process in print, including false starts and failed computations, and that this record lets a reader judge both the reach and the limits of his method. The central technical demonstration is a correction: Euler's general solution of the difference equation $f(x+1)-f(x)=g(x)$ is missing the term $-\frac{1}{2} g(x)$, which also explains why his derivation of Stirling's formula comes out one factor short. A sympathetic reader is asked to see this near-miss as characteristic: Euler's habit of treating infinite-order equations by analogy with finite ones carried him very far, but the analogy itself set his horizon.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is Euler's identification of the shift operator with an infinite differential operator: $f(x+1)-f(x)=(e^{d/dx}-1)f(x)$. Treating this as an infinite-order linear equation, Euler looked for solutions associated with the roots of $e^z-1=0$, namely $z=2\pi i k$. The paper's correction is obtained by expanding the inverse operator $1/(e^z-1)$ in partial fractions, $$\frac{1}{e^z-1}=-\frac{1}{2}+\sum_{k\neq 0}\frac{1}{z-2\pi i k},$$ where the $-\frac{1}{2}$ term is precisely what the root-based construction drops. This operator calculus—roots of the characteristic 'polynomial' versus reciprocal expansion—carries the entire argument, connecting the correction to the Euler–Maclaurin summation formula and to the Fourier-series form of periodic solutions.

What would settle it

Two checks would settle the matter. Mathematically, substitute the corrected formula (39) into f(x+1)-f(x)=g(x) for a simple g such as g(x)=x and verify that Euler's formula (28) fails by -x/2 while (39) holds for a suitable choice of constants. Historically, discovery of a manuscript, letter, or notebook in which Euler privately records the missing -1/2 g(x) term or the correct Stirling formula while publishing the incomplete version would undercut the paper's claim that his working style—not concealment—explains the error.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the author's account, Euler's working style was a coherent method, not a collection of loose arguments. He began with the simplest concrete cases, used formal manipulations of series, products, and differential operators, and repeatedly confirmed a result by several independent routes; he also published arguments he knew were incomplete and even erroneous ones, treating them as contributions to discovery. The key case study is Euler's treatment of $f(x+1)-f(x)=g(x)$ in [EulerE189]. Because $f(x+1)-f(x)=(e^{d/dx}-1)f(x)$, Euler solved the characteristic equation $e^z-1=0$ and built a solution from the roots $2\pi i k$. The paper shows that this root-based construction yields (28), which is not the complete solution: the full general solution (39) contains an additional term $-\frac{1}{2} g(x)$. Consequently Euler's asymptotic formula for the factorial misses the factor $\sqrt{2\pi/x}$; the paper derives the corrected form and explains why the error escaped Euler's checks. The same method of close reading produces a taxonomy of Euler's limits—missing concepts, missing tools, misleading formulations, and his own preference of practical discovery over abstract demonstration—and uncovers several results usually credited to later mathematicians.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the assumption that Euler's published papers, including his failures and false starts, faithfully show how he actually discovered mathematics; if he concealed or staged his reasoning, the paper's conclusions about why he did or did not prove certain theorems lose their evidential basis.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Euler's solution of the simple difference equation is incomplete as published; the complete solution includes $-\frac{1}{2}g(x)$, and his derivation of Stirling's formula can be repaired only by adding the missing logarithmic term.
  • Several results usually credited to later mathematicians—Fourier coefficients, the product formula for the gamma function, the multiplication formula, the Weierstrass-product idea, Mellin-transform-type integrals, and the hypergeometric series—already occur in Euler's works, often in a different form or context.
  • Euler's boundaries have identifiable causes: concepts that did not yet exist (function, limit, sum of a divergent series, Riemann surface), tools he lacked (as for quadratic reciprocity), formulations that misled him (as for elliptic integrals and solvability by radicals), and his own preference for practical discovery over abstract demonstration (as for complex analysis).
  • Some theorems Euler stated without proof were within his reach: he could have used his own methods to prove the functional equation of the zeta function, and some of his formulas yield a heuristic path to the prime number theorem.
  • Reading Euler's published record as an honest trace of his discovery process makes it possible to say where his research reached and where it could not go.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The missing $-\frac{1}{2}$ term is probably a general signature of root-based solutions of infinite-order operator equations: the root construction counts only nonzero modes, while the partial-fraction expansion also captures the residue at $z=0$. This suggests a heuristic for auditing other formal solutions from the same era.
  • If the paper's reading is right, Euler's false and incomplete publications constitute a rare dataset for the psychology of mathematical creativity; his taxonomy of limits could be tested on other pre-modern mathematicians whose papers are less confessional.
  • A natural extension is to place (39) in a modern setting: interpreting the series and integrals in an appropriate distribution or analytic-continuation sense would turn Euler's formal correction into a rigorous general solution and connect it to the Euler–Maclaurin formula.
  • The same operator technique used here—expanding $1/(e^z-1)$ rather than finding its zeros—might yield corrected versions of other Euler results that relied on treating infinite-order equations as finite, for example his infinite-order differential equations in Section 4.2.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript is an unusually long German-language historical monograph on Leonhard Euler's mathematical working style. Its announced goal is to judge both how far Euler's research could reach and where it stopped, by reconstructing his methods from his published papers. The chapters move from Euler's mathematical philosophy, through case studies of his working habits (Basel problem, differential and difference equations), to priority claims, theorems Euler stated without proving, and structural limits attributed to his conceptual repertoire and work ethic. The most concrete mathematical contribution is in Section 4.3.4: Euler's solution of the simple difference equation f(x+1)-f(x)=g(x) is shown to miss the term -1/2 g(x), and the corrected complete solution is given in Eq. (39). The book also contains new derivations connecting Euler's formulas to later results, including Ramanujan-type identities.

Significance. If the historical thesis can be sustained, the study is a substantial contribution to Euler scholarship: it goes beyond lists of priority claims and tries to explain the internal constraints of Euler's ways of working. The manuscript's evident strengths are its close engagement with primary sources, systematic use of Eneström numbers, generous reproduction of original pages, and the mathematically coherent correction in Section 4.3.4, which is cross-checked against the Euler-Maclaurin formula and Wedderburn's later note. The derivations in Sections 8.1 and 8.2, connecting Euler's ideas to Ramanujan's formulas, are also explicit and testable. The significance is, however, conditional: the strongest historical conclusions depend on the claim that Euler's published papers are a transparent record of his discovery process, including his failures, and this premise is asserted rather than archivally established.

major comments (3)
  1. [2.3, footnote 16; 6.2; 7.3] The load-bearing historical premise is the assertion in Section 2.3 (footnote 16) that Euler 'seinen Entdeckungsprozess samt seiner Misserfolge in seinen Arbeiten kund getan hat.' On this premise rest the negative conclusions in Sections 6.2 and 7.3, in particular Section 6.2.3 (Euler could not see the incompleteness of his reasoning for Fermat's n=3 case) and Section 7.3.1 (Euler chose not to develop a comprehensive complex analysis). These are arguments from absence in the published record, and the manuscript gives no systematic check of Euler's extensive correspondence (Opera Omnia IVA) or posthumous manuscripts. The positive examples of published failures (E352, E125) show a tendency toward transparency, not a guarantee for every case where a negative conclusion is drawn. The introduction's claim that the approach permits a judgment of 'wohin [Eulers Forschungen] nicht mehr zu reichen vermochten' therefore needs either an archival supplement or an explicit restriction of all such conclusions to the limits of the published oeuvre.
  2. [4.3.4, Eqs. (39), (41)] The corrected formula (39) is plausible and agrees with known results in the formal operator picture, but the derivation via the partial fraction expansion (41) treats 1/(z-2πik) as an integral operator and then interchanges an infinite sum with integration. For a general function g these operations are not justified as ordinary equality; in many cases the sum is only meaningful as a distributional or formal Fourier series. The word 'vollständige Lösung' in the text is therefore stronger than what the derivation establishes. The authors should either state the class of functions for which (39) is a solution, or explicitly present it as a formal solution in Euler's sense, with Wedderburn's note cited as the source for a rigorous function-class version.
  3. [6.1; 6.2] The division in Sections 6.1 and 6.2 between theorems Euler 'could have proved' and those he 'could not prove' is methodologically asymmetrical. Section 6.1.2, for instance, supplies a proof of the zeta functional equation that Euler 'could have given,' and Section 6.1.3 does the same for the theta function. These counterfactual claims require an explicit criterion about which techniques, results, and notations are available to the historical Euler at a given date. Without such a criterion, 'could have' claims are not testable and cannot bear the weight of the subsequent contrast with the 'could not' claims in Section 6.2. This is a central methodological gap in the manuscript's main argument.
minor comments (5)
  1. [3.2.1, Eq. (6)] In the differential of log(sqrt(x^2+y^2)), the text gives 'xdx+ydx' in the numerator; this should presumably read 'xdx+ydy', matching the preceding expression for d arctan(y/x).
  2. [3.1.4] There is a duplicated word in the sentence 'Euler schreibt schreibt' in the discussion of the preface to the Calculi Differentialis; it should be removed.
  3. [Figure 38 caption] The caption spells 'Poission' in the reference to Poisson's paper; the correct spelling is 'Poisson'.
  4. [4.3.4] The sentence containing 'mehrere mehrere' has a doubled adjective and should be corrected.
  5. [2.1] The sentence estimating the size of Euler's opus says 'auf ungefähr 30000 beläuft'; the missing noun 'Seiten' makes the sentence incomplete and should be supplied.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the mathematical corrections are independently derived and the self-citations are explicit, checkable prior work rather than load-bearing circular support.

full rationale

The paper's central mathematical claim, the correction of Euler's solution of f(x+1)-f(x)=g(x) in Section 4.3.4, is derived from the partial fraction decomposition (41), 1/(e^z-1) = -1/2 + sum_{k≠0} 1/(z-2kπi), and the operator identity (42)-(43). This derivation does not use Euler's answer as an input; the missing term -1/2 g(x) is obtained by a construction that is checked against the independent solutions by Wedderburn (1914) and Bourlet (1899). The historical-psychological conclusions depend on the stated premise in Section 2.3, footnote 16, that Euler 'seinen Entdeckungsprozess samt seiner Misserfolge in seinen Arbeiten kund getan hat.' This is a substantive interpretive assumption and may be debatable on evidentiary grounds, but it is not circular: the premise is not defined in terms of the conclusions it is used to support, and the paper does not claim to derive that premise from the target results. The extensive list of the author's prior publications in footnote 11 is self-citation, but those cited works are checkable mathematical papers with proofs (e.g., on Ramanujan formulas, Legendre polynomials, the Gamma function, and the zeta functional equation), not unverified authorities invoked to forbid alternatives. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the author's own prior work, and no known result is merely relabeled. The skeptical concern about arguments from absence of published proofs is a correctness/evidence concern, not a circularity concern under the stated criteria. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained against external mathematical benchmarks, so the appropriate score is low; the score of 2 reflects only the presence of self-citations and the heavy reliance on a transparency premise, neither of which makes the main reasoning circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities appear. The central interpretive claims rest on three domain assumptions: the authenticity of Euler's writings as evidence, the reliability of the Euler Archive and Opera Omnia sources, and the legitimacy of translating Euler's formulas into modern notation.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Euler's published texts faithfully record his discovery process, including failures.
    Invoked in Section 2.3 to justify psychological and historical inferences about how Euler worked.
  • domain assumption The Euler Archive and Opera Omnia provide authentic and complete copies of Euler's papers.
    Stated in the preface as the basis for all quotations and Eneström numbers.
  • domain assumption Modern notation and concepts can be applied to Euler's formulas without changing their mathematical substance.
    Used throughout Sections 5 to 8 to translate Euler's results into modern forms such as Fourier coefficients and Gamma products.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Eulers Horizonte -- M\"oglichkeiten und Grenzen seiner Arbeitsweise in der Mathematik." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/O3PLEHLB

@misc{pith2026250523286,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Eulers Horizonte -- M\"oglichkeiten und Grenzen seiner Arbeitsweise in der Mathematik},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/O3PLEHLB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.23286}
}
read the original abstract

A Thesis about Euler discussing the possibilities and limits of his method of work in Mathematics.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Space-Time Approach to Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

    Edition (2007). [Feynman] Feynman, R. (1948) “Space-Time Approach to Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics.”Reviews of Modern Physics. 20 (2)(1948): pp. 367–387. Abrufbar online unter:https://journals.aps.org/rmp/ abstract/10.1103/RevModPhys.20.367. [Fourier] Fourier, J. (1822).Th´ eorie analytique de la chaleur, Nachdruck der Originalversion herausgegeben v...

    work page arXiv 2007

  2. [2]

    Note on the simple Difference Equa- tion

    Edition (1995). [Wedderburn] Wedderburn, J. (1915) “Note on the simple Difference Equa- tion.”Annals of Mathematics, Volume 16, 2nd Series(1914-1915): pp. 82–85. [Weierstraß1] Weierstraß, K. (1856) “ ¨Uber die Theorie der analti- schen Fakult ¨aten.”Crelle Journal f ¨ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik, Band 51:(1854): pp. 1-61. Online abrufbar unter: ...

    arXiv 1995

  3. [30]

    Some new series for $1/\pi$ and related congruences

    Edition (1954). [Sonar] Sonar, T. (2016).3000 Jahre Analysis: Geschichte - Kulturen - Men- schen, Springer Spektrum; 2. korrigierte Edition (2016). 392 [Spearman] Spearman, B.; Williams, K. (1994) “Characterization of Solva- ble Quinticsx 5 +ax+b.”The American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 101, No. 10(1994): pp. 986–992. [Speiser1] Speiser, A. (1921). Vorwor...

    work page Pith review arXiv 1954

  4. [35]

    De termino generali serierum hypergeome- tricarum

    Nachdruck in Opera Omnia: Serie 1, Band 6, pp. 434–446. Origi- naltext abrufbar online unterhttps://scholarlycommons.pacific. edu/euler/. Eine ¨Ubersetzung von Henry J. Stevens und T. Christine Stevens ins Englische findet sich unterhttps://scholarlycommons. pacific.edu/euler-works/644/. [EulerE652] Euler, L. (1793). “De termino generali serierum hypergeo...

    work page

  5. [55]

    De Determinantium functionalibus

    Die gesammelten Werke sind herausgegeben auf Veranlassung der K¨oniglich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften und sind onli- ne abrufbar unter:https://web.archive.org/web/20130513144451/ http://portail.mathdoc.fr/cgi-bin/oetoc?id=OE_JACOBI__1. [Jacobi5] Jacobi, C. (1841). “De Determinantium functionalibus.”Crel- le Journal f ¨ur die reine und die ange...

    work page arXiv 2009

  6. [69]

    Recherches sur la courbure des surfaces

    Originaltext abrufbar online unterhttps://scholarlycommons. pacific.edu/euler/. [EulerE333] Euler, L. (1767). “Recherches sur la courbure des surfaces” (E333).M´ emoires de l’acad´ emie des sciences de Berlin, Band 16, (1763): pp. 119–143. Nachdruck in Opera Omnia: Serie 1, Band 28, pp. 1–28. Originaltext abrufbar online unterhttps://scholarlycommons. pac...

    work page

  7. [75]

    Observationes in aliquot theoremata illust- rissimi de la Grange

    Nachdruck in Opera Omnia: Serie 1, Band 15, pp. 569–603. Origi- naltext abrufbar online unterhttps://scholarlycommons.pacific. edu/euler/. [EulerE587] Euler, L. (1785). “Observationes in aliquot theoremata illust- rissimi de la Grange” (E587).Opuscula analytica, Band 2(1775): pp. 16–41. Nachdruck in Opera Omnia: Serie 1, Band 18, pp. 156–177. Ori- ginalte...

    work page

  8. [101]

    De resolutione fractionum transcenden- tium in infinitas fractiones simplices

    Nachdruck in Opera Omnia: Serie 1, Band 4, pp. 136–145. Origi- naltext abrufbar online unterhttps://scholarlycommons.pacific. edu/euler/. Eine ¨Ubersetzung ins Englische von Geoffrey Smith ist online abrufbar unter:https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/ euler-works/591/. [EulerE592] Euler, L. (1785). “De resolutione fractionum transcenden- tium in infinita...

    work page

Show all 30 references
  1. [132]

    De formulis specieimxx+nyyad nu- meros primos explorandos idoneis earumque mirabilibus proprietati- bus

    Nachdruck in Opera Omnia: Serie 1, Band 16,2, pp. 333–345. Ori- ginaltext abrufbar online unterhttps://scholarlycommons.pacific. edu/euler/. [EulerE708] Euler, L. (1801). “De formulis specieimxx+nyyad nu- meros primos explorandos idoneis earumque mirabilibus proprietati- bus” ...

  2. [140]

    Theorema maxime memoragile circa formu- lam integralem R ∂ϕcosλϕ (1+aa−2acosϕ) n+1

    Originaltext abrufbar online unterhttps://scholarlycommons. pacific.edu/euler/. [EulerE672] Euler, L. (1778). “Theorema maxime memoragile circa formu- lam integralem R ∂ϕcosλϕ (1+aa−2acosϕ) n+1 ” (E672).Institutionum calculi in- tegralis, Band 4, (1794): pp. 194–217. Nachdruck...

  3. [149]

    Constructio aequationis differentio- differentialisAydu 2 + (B+Cu)dudy+ (D+Eu+F uu)ddy= 0

    Nachdruck in Opera Omnia: Serie 1, Band 20, pp. 235–255. Origi- naltext abrufbar online unterhttps://scholarlycommons.pacific. edu/euler/. [EulerE274] Euler, L. (1763). “Constructio aequationis differentio- differentialisAydu 2 + (B+Cu)dudy+ (D+Eu+F uu)ddy= 0” (E274).Novi Comm...

  4. [155]

    De mirabilibus proprietatibus unciarum, quae in evolutione binomii ad potestatem quamcunqua evecti occurr- unt

    Originaltext abrufbar online unterhttps://scholarlycommons. pacific.edu/euler/. [EulerE575] Euler, L. (1784). “De mirabilibus proprietatibus unciarum, quae in evolutione binomii ad potestatem quamcunqua evecti occurr- unt” (E575).Acta Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropoli...

  5. [166]

    Editor: Dunham, W., The Mathematical Association of America,

  6. [167]

    Novae demonstrationes circa resolutio- nem numerorum in quadrata

    Originaltext abrufbar online unterhttps://scholarlycommons. pacific.edu/euler/. [EulerE445] Euler, L. (1773). “Novae demonstrationes circa resolutio- nem numerorum in quadrata” (E445).Nova acta eruditorum, Band von 1773(1772): pp. 193–211. Nachdruck in Opera Omnia: Se- rie 1, ...

  7. [168]

    Specimen alterum methodi novae quantita- tes transcendentes inter se comparandi; de comparatione arcuum el- lipsis

    Originaltext abrufbar online unterhttps://scholarlycommons. pacific.edu/euler/. Eine ¨Ubersetzung ins Englische ist online abruf- bar unter:https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/euler-works/ 258/. [EulerE261] Euler, L. (1761). “Specimen alterum methodi novae quantita- tes trans...

  8. [173]

    Exercitationes analyticae

    Originaltext abrufbar online unterhttps://scholarlycommons. pacific.edu/euler/. [EulerE432] Euler, L. (1773). “Exercitationes analyticae” (E432).Novi Commentarii academiae scientiarum Petropolitanae, Band 17(1772): pp. 173–204. Nachdruck in Opera Omnia: Serie 1, Band 15, pp. 131–

  9. [176]

    Analytica explicatio methodi maximorum et minimorum

    Originaltext abrufbar online unterhttps://scholarlycommons. pacific.edu/euler/. [EulerE297] Euler, L. (1766). “Analytica explicatio methodi maximorum et minimorum” (E297).Novi Commentarii academiae scientiarum Pe- tropolitanae, Band 10, (1756): pp. 93–134. Nachdruck in Opera O...

  10. [196]

    Demonstratio theorematis insignis per coniecturam eruti circa intagrationem formulae R ∂ϕcosiϕ (1+aa−2acosϕ) n+1

    Originaltext abrufbar online unterhttps://scholarlycommons. pacific.edu/euler/. [EulerE674] Euler, L. (1778). “Demonstratio theorematis insignis per coniecturam eruti circa intagrationem formulae R ∂ϕcosiϕ (1+aa−2acosϕ) n+1 ” (E674).Institutionum calculi integralis, Band 4, 17...

  11. [208]

    Vollst ¨andige Anleitung zur Algebra, Zweiter Theil

    Originaltext abrufbar online unterhttps://scholarlycommons. pacific.edu/euler/. [EulerE388] Euler, L. (1770). “Vollst ¨andige Anleitung zur Algebra, Zweiter Theil” (E388).St. Petersburg: Imperiale Academie der Wissenschaften (1767): pp. 1–532. Nachdruck in Opera Omnia: Serie 1...

  12. [210]

    Miscellanea analytica

    Nachdruck in Opera Omnia: Serie 1, Band 15, pp. 435–497. Origi- naltext abrufbar online unterhttps://scholarlycommons.pacific. edu/euler/. [EulerE560] Euler, L. (1783). “Miscellanea analytica” (E560).Opuscula analytica, Band 1(1773): pp. 329–344. Nachdruck in Opera Om- nia: Se...

  13. [217]

    Consideratio aequationis differentio- differentialis (a+bx)ddz+ (c+ex) dxdz x + (f+gx) zdx2 xx = 0

    Originaltext abrufbar online unterhttps://scholarlycommons. pacific.edu/euler/. Eine ¨Ubersetzung ins Englische von Jordan Bell ist online abrufbar unter:https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/ euler-works/428/. [EulerE431] Euler, L. (1773). “Consideratio aequationis differentio...

  14. [234]

    Exercitatio analytica

    Originaltext abrufbar online unterhttps://scholarlycommons. pacific.edu/euler/. [EulerE664] Euler, L. (1794). “Exercitatio analytica” (E664).Nova Ac- ta Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae, Band 8(1776): pp. 69–72. Nachdruck in Opera Omnia: Serie 1, Band 16,1, pp. 235–

  15. [239]

    De serie Lambertina plurimisque eius insi- gnibus proprietatibus

    Nachdruck in Opera Omnia: Serie 1, Band 7, pp. 291-292. Origi- naltext abrufbar online unterhttps://scholarlycommons.pacific. edu/euler/. Eine ¨Ubersetzung ins Englische von Andie Ho und Do- minic Klyve ist online abrufbar unter:https://scholarlycommons. pacific.edu/euler-work...

    2023

  16. [240]

    De formulis differentialibus angularibus ma- xime irrationalibus, quas tamen per logarithmos et arcus circulares in- tegrare licet

    Originaltext abrufbar online unterhttps://scholarlycommons. pacific.edu/euler/. Eine ¨Ubersetzung von Jordan Bell in Englische ist online abrufbar unter:https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/ euler-works/664/. [EulerE671] Euler, L. (1777). “De formulis differentialibus angulari...

  17. [297]

    Extrait d’un lettre de M. Euler ` a M. Be- guelin en Mai 1778

    Originaltext abrufbar online unterhttps://scholarlycommons. pacific.edu/euler/. Eine ¨Ubersetzung ins Englische von George Hei- ne ist online abrufbar unter:https://scholarlycommons.pacific. edu/euler-works/492/. [EulerE498] Euler, L. (1779). “Extrait d’un lettre de M. Euler `...

  18. [351]

    Facillima methodus plurimos numeros pri- mos praemagnos inveniendi

    Originaltext abrufbar online unterhttps://scholarlycommons. pacific.edu/euler/. Eine ¨Ubersetzung ins Englische von Georg Eh- lers ist online abrufbar unterhttps://scholarlycommons.pacific. edu/euler-works/716/. [EulerE718] Euler, L. (1805). “Facillima methodus plurimos numero...

  19. [398]

    De insigni paradoxo, quod in analysi maxi- morum et minimorum occurrit

    Originaltext abrufbar online unterhttps://scholarlycommons. pacific.edu/euler/. Eine ¨Ubersetzung ins Englische von Jordan Bell ist online abrufbar unter:https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/ euler-works/725/. 376 [EulerE735] Euler, L. (1811). “De insigni paradoxo, quod in ana...

  20. [438]

    Anleitung zur Naturlehre

    Originaltext abrufbar online unterhttps://scholarlycommons. pacific.edu/euler/. Eine ¨Ubersetzung ins Englische von Todd Dou- cet ist online abrufbar unterhttps://scholarlycommons.pacific. edu/euler-works/807/. [EulerE842] Euler, L. (1862). “Anleitung zur Naturlehre” (E842).Op...

    1988

  21. [498]

    Considerationes de traiectoriis orthogona- libus

    Originaltext abrufbar online unterhttps://scholarlycommons. pacific.edu/euler/. [EulerE390] Euler, L. (1770). “Considerationes de traiectoriis orthogona- libus” (E390).Novi Commentarii academiae scientiarum Petropolita- nae, Band 14(1768): pp. 104–128. Nachdruck in Opera Omnia...

  22. [1079]

    Recherches sur l’attraction des sph´ ero ¨ ıdes homog` enes

    Abrufbar online unter:https://www.ams.org/journals/bull/ 1966-72-06/S0002-9904-1966-11654-3/. [Leibniz] Leibniz, G. (1704).Nouveaux Essais sur l’entendement humain, erstmals ver ¨offentlicht 1765. Eine Version von 1886 ist abrufbar online unter:https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/1214...

    1981

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.