Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 69 references

Lift augmentation by incorporating bend twist coupled composites in flapping wing

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that passive bend–twist coupling in a flapping composite wing can raise average lift to 6.9 N from 1.39 N for a bending-only wing, roughly a fivefold increase, and boost average thrust by about 77 percent, all without an…

desk verdict A plausible and interesting FSI demonstration that passive bend-twist coupling sharply increases lift on a flapping wing, but the headline ratio rests on a single unverified mesh/time step and a favorable operating point. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.23372 v1 pith:EB5MC536 submitted 2025-05-29 physics.flu-dyn

Rahul Kumar , Devranjan Samanta , Srikant S. Padhee This is my paper
classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords flappingwingbend-twistcouplingcompositelaminatefluid-structureinteractionliftaugmentationleading-edgevortexmicroairvehiclesfibreorientation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses two-way fluid–structure interaction simulations to test a rectangular flapping wing whose composite laminate is arranged so that bending during the flap automatically twists the wing. The central claim is that passive bend–twist coupling (BTC) raises average lift to 6.9 N compared with 1.39 N for a bending-only flexible wing, roughly a fivefold increase, while raising average thrust by about 77 percent at a reduced frequency of 0.3. The authors argue that this passive shape adaptation could give small flapping-wing vehicles the twisting that birds achieve actively, without extra mechanisms. They also report that the optimal reduced-frequency window for efficiency is 0.25 to 0.4, and that peak stress stays below the material's yield strength.

What carries the argument

The central object is bend–twist coupling in a fibre-reinforced composite laminate: an off-axis ply arrangement in which bending deformation induces a rotation of the wing about its longitudinal axis, so no external twist actuator is needed. The mechanism is carried by a two-way coupled fluid–structure interaction calculation in which the pressure field deforms the wing at each time step and the deformed wing changes the flow domain. The specific fibre orientation that maximises twist is taken from a laminate design study, and the paper uses Q-criterion vortex identification to connect the resulting vortex structures to the force production.

What would settle it

Measure the average lift and thrust of the same 600 mm x 200 mm wing with a 1.2 mm asymmetric IM7/8552 laminate at Re = 150,000 and k = 0.3 in a wind tunnel, and compare with the reported 6.9 N and the 77% thrust gain; alternatively, rerun the simulation at half the cell size and half the time step and see whether the 6.9 N value changes by more than the 6% validation band.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that an asymmetric composite layup can turn the flapping motion itself into a lift-augmentation mechanism. In the numerical model, a 600 mm x 200 mm x 1.2 mm rectangular wing made of IM7/8552 composite with an asymmetric laminate reaches a maximum twist of 17.20 degrees and a bending deflection of 84.636 mm at mid-stroke, whereas the [0/0/0/0] bending wing twists only 1.22 degrees. This extra twist restructures the vortex field: the BTC wing holds stronger, more consistently attached leading-edge and trailing-edge vortices, which the paper identifies as the reason for the higher lift. The reported average lift values are 1.39 N for the bending wing and 6.9 N for the BTC wing, against a wing weight of 2.21 N, so the BTC wing is the only one of the two that can support itself under the stated conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that one fixed mesh of about 3.28 million cells and a fixed time step of 0.005 s resolve the flapping flow accurately enough, since the solver was checked only against a NACA0012 airfoil at a different Reynolds number and no grid or time-step convergence test is reported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Flapping-wing micro air vehicles could shed active wing-twist mechanisms and rely on tailored composite layups for passive shape adaptation.
  • A simple sinusoidal plunging motion, with fixed angle of attack, can generate enough lift to support the wing's own weight once bend–twist coupling is included.
  • The non-monotonic lift response with reduced frequency means BTC wings have a preferred operating band, k = 0.25–0.4, rather than the monotonic behaviour of bending-only wings.
  • Because peak Von Mises stress stays at 143 MPa against a 700 MPa yield strength, the same laminate can be used structurally without reinforcing the wing.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the fivefold ratio holds at lower Reynolds numbers, passive BTC could replace servo-driven wing twisting in small drones, reducing mass and control complexity.
  • The vortex mechanism suggests a design rule: layups should be tuned to keep the leading-edge vortex attached through the downstroke, rather than maximising twist angle alone.
  • The decrease in lift beyond k=0.3 hints at a resonance-like match between flapping frequency and the structure's twist response; testing a range of laminate thicknesses could map that peak.
  • The absolute values rest on one mesh and one time step, so a grid-refinement check and a wind-tunnel test of the 6.9 N figure would be the direct next step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents three-dimensional, two-way coupled fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulations of a rectangular flapping wing with different composite laminate stacking sequences. The central claim is that a bend-twist coupled (BTC) laminate, compared with a unidirectional bending-only laminate, increases average lift by up to five times (6.9 N vs 1.39 N at k=0.3) and average thrust by about 77%, while keeping the maximum Von Mises stress below the material yield strength. The authors attribute the lift gain to stronger and more persistently attached leading-edge and trailing-edge vortices enabled by passive twist. The fluid solver is validated against published data for a plunging NACA0012 airfoil at Re=30,000 and k=1.82, with lift and thrust deviations below 6% and 4%. The main simulation, however, is performed at Re=150,000 and k approximately 0.3 on the actual 600x200 mm wing using a single mesh of 3,284,585 cells and a fixed time step of 0.005 s, with no grid-independence or time-step-convergence study. The structural predictions (17.20 degrees of twist and 84.636 mm of bending deflection) are not validated against any experimental or analytical result.

Significance. If the result holds, the paper proposes a practical passive mechanism—bend-twist coupled composite laminates—to achieve a large lift improvement in flapping-wing micro air vehicles without external twist actuation. The study's strengths are its use of a fully coupled FSI framework, a validation case against published data, a systematic exploration of fiber orientations, and a vortex-dynamics-based explanation of the lift mechanism. The paper also reports safety factors relative to yield stress. However, the headline five-fold lift augmentation is currently supported only by a single unverified simulation at the operating condition; the absence of grid and temporal convergence evidence and the lack of regime-appropriate validation make the quantitative claim plausible but not yet established.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.3 and §5.2] The central quantitative claim—6.9 N versus 1.39 N average lift, and the resulting five-fold ratio—rests on a single simulation with 3,284,585 cells and a fixed time step of 0.005 s at Re=150,000 and k=0.3. No grid-independence or time-step-convergence study is reported for the actual 600x200 mm wing. The time step corresponds to roughly 38 steps per flapping cycle (period approximately 0.19 s for k=0.3, c=0.2 m, U=11 m/s), which is likely too coarse to resolve leading-edge vortex formation and shedding in an LES. Since the lift augmentation is attributed to LEV dynamics in Section 5.5, an under-resolved vortex or an incorrect FSI load could change the 6.9 N value and the five-fold ratio. A convergence study at representative conditions (e.g., k=0.3, alpha=10 deg) is necessary to support the headline claim.
  2. [§5.3 and §1] The comparison underlying the five-fold claim is ambiguous. The abstract and introduction state that the BTC wing generates 'lift more than five times greater than bending cases,' while Section 5.3 reports a 4.75-times increase when comparing the BTC wing's peak lift coefficient at alpha=10 deg with the bending wing's peak lift coefficient at alpha=15 deg. The measured forces in Section 5.2 (6.9 N vs 1.39 N) are likely obtained at the fixed alpha=10 deg stated in Section 3, which is the BTC wing's optimum but not the bending wing's optimum. The paper should state clearly whether the claim refers to a matched-angle comparison or a comparison of each configuration's optimum, and the reporting should be consistent between the abstract, Section 5.2, and Section 5.3.
  3. [§5.1 and §4] The structural FSI predictions are not validated. The maximum twist angle of 17.20 degrees and bending deflection of 84.636 mm for the BTC laminate come solely from the transient structural solver coupled to the LES; no comparison is made with an experiment, an analytical beam solution, or an independent finite-element benchmark. The validation in Section 4 is for a NACA0012 airfoil at Re=30,000 and k=1.82 and does not exercise the composite bend-twist coupling or the structural solver. Because the aerodynamic benefit is attributed to the twist-induced vortex dynamics, an incorrect twist amplitude would directly undermine the central claim. A structural validation case (e.g., a cantilever composite laminate under a known static load) is required.
  4. [§5.4] The claimed optimal reduced-frequency range k=0.25-0.4 is inferred from a small number of simulations, each performed with the same fixed mesh and time step, and without any uncertainty quantification. The non-monotonic behavior of the BTC wing's lift coefficient with k is physically plausible, but the exact location and width of the optimum could shift with spatial or temporal resolution. The efficiency peak claim should be accompanied either by convergence checks at several k values or by a clear statement that the trend is preliminary.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§2.3] The sentence 'a fixed time step of 0.005s seconds is employed' contains a typo ('0.005s seconds'); it should read '0.005 s'.
  2. [§2.3] The definition of the reduced frequency is mentioned in Section 3 ('Reduced frequency is a dimensionless parameter crucial in unsteady aerodynamics, defined as ...'), but the formula itself is missing from the extracted text. Please add the explicit equation for k, including the definitions of the angular frequency, chord length, and freestream velocity.
  3. [§2.3] The description of the Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy condition uses a global 'mesh node interval' rather than the local cell size; this is not the standard CFL definition and should be clarified, especially since the mesh is tetrahedral with varying cell sizes.
  4. [§4] The validation references appear duplicated: reference [36] and reference [52] both cite Heathcote et al. (2008). Please consolidate the duplicate reference and clearly identify which dataset (experimental, DVM, or Gordnier et al.) is used for each comparison in Figure 2.
  5. [§5.1] In the paragraph after Eq. (15), the sentence 'the higher stress experienced by the bending wing suggests that, from a structural perspective, the BTC wing configuration is more structurally stronger in this scenario' is confusingly worded; rephrase to clarify the intended comparison.
  6. [Table 2 and Fig. 4] Some stacking sequences in Table 2 appear with garbled symbols (e.g., the optimal layup is not legible in the extracted text). Ensure that all fiber-orientation sequences are printed correctly in the final manuscript, and use the same notation consistently in Table 2, Figure 4, and the conclusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction in the lift-augmentation claim; the 5x result is a direct two-way FSI simulation output. Minor self-citations for the laminate layup and kinematics are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central quantitative claim (6.9 N versus 1.39 N mean lift, Section 5.2) is obtained by integrating surface pressure and viscous stress on a deformable wing in a two-way coupled FSI simulation; it is not a fitted constant, and no equation in the paper forces the ratio to be five. The BTC laminate [24.32/-65.68]s is taken from the authors' prior work (Ref. [35]), but Section 5.1 independently reproduces the twist ordering in Table 2, so the aerodynamic comparison does not reduce to accepting the self-citation. The choice of alpha = 10 degrees is explicitly post hoc ('at alpha=10 degrees the BTC wing has highest lift coefficient', Section 3; 'This angle of attack was selected as highest CL was achieved at 10 degrees by the BTC wing', Section 5.1), and the k approximately 0.3 peak is read from the same response curves; this affects the fairness and robustness of the comparison but is not a definitional reduction, because the reported lift values remain simulation outputs at a stated operating point. Section 4 validates against external NACA0012 data at Re = 30,000 and k = 1.82; the absence of grid and time-step convergence at the operating conditions is a numerical-correctness risk, not circularity. No self-citation is used to forbid alternative explanations, and the governing equations are standard LES/FSI definitions rather than self-referential relations.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claim is driven by the simulation pipeline rather than a new theory. The important numerical choices, the angle of attack, the reduced frequency, the max-twist laminate from the authors' earlier work, and the wing thickness, are selected either from the same output data or from prior self-cited work. All fluid and structural modeling assumptions come from standard LES/FSI practice. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Angle of attack alpha = 10 degrees
    Selected because Fig. 6 shows the BTC wing's maximum averaged lift at alpha=10 degrees; using this value for both wings makes the 5x comparison favorable.
  • Reduced frequency at peak performance = k=0.3 for lift, optimal efficiency band 0.25-0.4
    Selected from the swept k-range in Figs. 7-8; the claimed optimal band is an output of the same data used to define the claim.
  • Laminate stacking sequence = [24.32/-65.68]
    Taken from the authors' prior work (Ref. [35]) as the maximum-twist sequence; no full optimization over all possible layups is performed in this paper.
  • Wing thickness = 1.2 mm
    The paper states the thickness was optimized to achieve maximum deflection without failure, but no supporting parametric data are shown.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Incompressible filtered Navier-Stokes with the mixed-time-scale (MTS) SGS model is an adequate turbulence closure for this flow.
    Invoked in Section 2.1; the main results depend on the turbulence model, but only the NACA0012 plunging-airfoil case is validated.
  • domain assumption Two-way exchange of pressure loads and displacements between ANSYS Fluent and Transient Structural converges at each time step and captures passive deformation.
    Invoked in Section 2.3; no coupling tolerances or sub-iteration details are reported.
  • domain assumption Linear elastic laminate theory with IM7/8552 properties, and without damping, delamination, or geometric nonlinearity, is sufficient for the wing structure.
    Invoked in Section 3 and Section 5.1; only Von Mises stress versus yield strength is checked.
  • domain assumption Prescribed sinusoidal rotation about the root with a constant 10 degree angle of attack is a representative flapping-wing kinematics for MAV design.
    Invoked in Section 3; the operating point is chosen from the same simulations.
  • domain assumption Validation of CL and CT on a NACA0012 airfoil at Re=30,000 and k=1.82 transfers to a rectangular composite wing at Re=150,000 and k=0.25-0.4.
    Invoked in Section 4; this extrapolation is not explicitly justified.
  • domain assumption The prior result that [24.32/-65.68] maximizes bend-twist coupling (Ref. [35]) is accepted as ground truth for choosing the laminate.
    Used in Section 5.1 to select the optimal stacking sequence without running a formal optimization in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Lift augmentation by incorporating bend twist coupled composites in flapping wing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EB5MC536

@misc{pith2026250523372,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Lift augmentation by incorporating bend twist coupled composites in flapping wing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EB5MC536}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.23372}
}
read the original abstract

Drawing inspiration from the adaptive wing shape of birds in flight, this study introduces a bio-inspired concept for shape adaptation utilizing bend-twist coupling (BTC) in composite laminates. The primary aim of the design optimization is to identify the optimal fibre orientation angles needed to produce the required bending and twisting deformations, which directly contribute to the design's goal of maximizing lift without relying on external mechanisms for twisting. This novel technique increases lift by up to five times compared to a curved bending wing. We have highlighted the vortex dynamics to provide insight into the underlying reasons for such a significant lift increment. In addition, the study presents the Von Mises stress experienced by the wing, offering a comprehensive understanding of the structural behavior. Furthermore, it highlights a significant improvement in efficiency, particularly within the optimal reduced frequency range of 0.25 to 0.4. These findings underscore the potential of this method for future applications in biomimetic drones, micro-air vehicles, and other flapping wing-based systems, ultimately paving the way for new advancements in aerodynamics and structural optimization for next-generation aerial vehicle designs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Two dimensional mechanism for insect hovering,

    Z. J. Wang, “Two dimensional mechanism for insect hovering,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 85, no. 10, p. 2216, 2000

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    Bumblebee flight in heavy turbulence,

    T. Engels, D. Kolomenskiy, K. Schneider, F. -O. Lehmann, and J. Sesterhenn, “Bumblebee flight in heavy turbulence,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 116, no. 2, p. 28103, 2016

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Flapping wing flight can save aerodynamic power compared to steady flight,

    U. Pesavento and Z. J. Wang, “Flapping wing flight can save aerodynamic power compared to steady flight,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 103, no. 11, p. 118102, 2009

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    Collective flow enhancement by tandem flapping wings,

    N. Gravish, J. M. Peters, S. A. Combes, and R. J. Wood, “Collective flow enhancement by tandem flapping wings,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 115, no. 18, p. 1 88101, 2015

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    C. J. Pennycuick, Modelling the flying bird. Elsevier, 2008

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    Aerodynamic efficiency explains flapping strategies used by birds,

    L. C. Johansson, “Aerodynamic efficiency explains flapping strategies used by birds,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 121, no. 46, p. e2410048121, 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Wing kinematics of avian flight across speeds,

    B. W. Tobalske, T. L . Hedrick, and A. A. Biewener, “Wing kinematics of avian flight across speeds,” J. Avian Biol., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 177–184, 2003

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    Aerodynamic performance and flow mechanism of 3D flapping wing using discrete vo rtex method,

    R. Kumar, S. S. Padhee, and D. Samanta, “Aerodynamic performance and flow mechanism of 3D flapping wing using discrete vo rtex method,” J. Fluids Struct. , vol. 127, no. December 2023, p. 104128, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2024.104128

    work page arXiv 2023

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    Numerical simulations of bio -inspired approaches to enhance underwater swimming efficiency ,

    R. Kumar, S. S. Padhee, and D. Samanta, “Numerical simulations of bio -inspired approaches to enhance underwater swimming efficiency ,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 36, no. 5, 2024, doi: 10.1063/5.0201926

    2024 doi

  2. [10]

    Vortex wake and flight kinematics of a swift in cruising flight in a wind tunnel,

    P. Henningsson, G. R. Spedding, and A. Hedenstrom, “Vortex wake and flight kinematics of a swift in cruising flight in a wind tunnel,” J. Exp. Biol., vol. 211, no. 5, pp. 717–730, 2008

    2008

  3. [11]

    Effects of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of flapping wings,

    C.-K. Kang, H. Aono, C. E. S. Cesnik, and W. Shyy, “Effects of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of flapping wings,” J. Fluid Mech. , vol. 689, pp. 32 –74, 2011

    2011

  4. [12]

    Optimization ‐ based study of bend –twist coupled rotor blades for passive and integrated passive/active load alleviation,

    C. L. Bottasso, F. Campagnolo, A. Croce, and C. Tibaldi, “Optimization ‐ based study of bend –twist coupled rotor blades for passive and integrated passive/active load alleviation,” Wind Energy, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1149–1166, 2013

    2013

  5. [13]

    Optimal Design of Wind Turbine Blades with Bend -Twist Couplings Effects,

    N. Roeleven, “Optimal Design of Wind Turbine Blades with Bend -Twist Couplings Effects,” 2018

    2018

  6. [14]

    Numerical investigation of an insect -scale flexible wing with a small amplitude flapping kinematics,

    Y. Guo, W. Yang, Y. Dong, and J. Xuan, “Numerical investigation of an insect -scale flexible wing with a small amplitude flapping kinematics,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 34, no. 8, 2022

    2022

  7. [15]

    Aerodynamic technologies to improve aircraft performance,

    A. Abbas, J. De Vicente, and E. Valero, “Aerodynamic technologies to improve aircraft performance,” Aerosp. Sci. Technol., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 100–132, 2013

    2013

  8. [16]

    On the role of vortical structures in aerodynamic performance of a hovering mosquito,

    J.-D. Zhang and W. -X. Huang, “On the role of vortical structures in aerodynamic performance of a hovering mosquito,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 31, no. 5, 2019

    2019

  9. [17]

    Aerodynamic interaction of bristled wing pairs in fling,

    V. T. Kasoju and A. Santhanakrishnan, “Aerodynamic interaction of bristled wing pairs in fling,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 33, no. 3, p. 31901, 2021

    2021

  10. [18]

    Aerodynamic performance of a free - flying dragonfly—A span-resolved investigation,

    C. Hefler, R. Noda, H. H. Qiu, and W. Shyy, “Aerodynamic performance of a free - flying dragonfly—A span-resolved investigation,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 32, no. 4, 2020

    2020

  11. [19]

    The spatial -temporal effects of wing 19 flexibility on aerodynamic performance of the flapping wing,

    L. Peng, T. Pan, M. Zheng, G. Su, and Q. Li, “The spatial -temporal effects of wing 19 flexibility on aerodynamic performance of the flapping wing,” Phys. Fluids, 2023

    2023

  12. [20]

    Extension -twist coupling optimization in composite rotor blades,

    S. Ozbay, O. Bauchau, S. Dancila, and E. Armanios, “Extension -twist coupling optimization in composite rotor blades,” in 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 2005, p. 2130

    2005

  13. [21]

    Optimization of extension -twist coupled composite blades for high -speed rotorcraft,

    M. DiPalma, E. Ferede, and F. Gandhi, “Optimization of extension -twist coupled composite blades for high -speed rotorcraft,” in Proceedings of the 74th American Helicopter Society Annual Forum, Phoenix, Arizona, 2018

    2018

  14. [22]

    Non -linear aeroelastic prediction for aircraft applications,

    M. J. de C. Henshaw et al., “Non -linear aeroelastic prediction for aircraft applications,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., vol. 43, no. 4–6, pp. 65–137, 2007

    2007

  15. [23]

    Advances in biomedical fluid –structure interaction: Methodologies and applications from an interfacing perspective,

    T. Hou et al., “Advances in biomedical fluid –structure interaction: Methodologies and applications from an interfacing perspective,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 36, no. 2, 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Numerical investigation of structural geometric nonlinearity effect in high -aspect-ratio wing using CFD/CSD coupled approach,

    H. H. Mian, G. Wang, and Z. -Y. Ye, “Numerical investigation of structural geometric nonlinearity effect in high -aspect-ratio wing using CFD/CSD coupled approach,” J. Fluids Struct., vol. 49, pp. 186–201, 2014

    2014

  17. [25]

    Experimental and theoretical study on aeroelastic response of high-aspect-ratio wings,

    D. Tang and E. H. Dowell, “Experimental and theoretical study on aeroelastic response of high-aspect-ratio wings,” AIAA J., vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 1430–1441, 2001

    2001

  18. [26]

    CFD -based analysis of nonlinear aeroelastic behavior of high -aspect ratio wings,

    M. Smith, M. Patil, and D. Hodges, “CFD -based analysis of nonlinear aeroelastic behavior of high -aspect ratio wings,” in 19th AIAA applied aerodynamics conference , 2001, p. 1582

    2001

  19. [27]

    Numerical investigation of nonlinear aeroelastic effects on flexible high- aspect-ratio wings,

    J. A. Garcia, “Numerical investigation of nonlinear aeroelastic effects on flexible high- aspect-ratio wings,” J. Aircr., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1025–1036, 2005

    2005

  20. [28]

    Investigations on the effects of structural damping on vortex -induced vibration response of an airfoil at a high angle of attack via the aero-damping map,

    B. Lian, X. Tong, X. Zhu, Z. Du, Y. Cui, and B. C. Khoo, “Investigations on the effects of structural damping on vortex -induced vibration response of an airfoil at a high angle of attack via the aero-damping map,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 35, no. 6, 2023

    2023

  21. [29]

    Fluid –structure interaction on vibrating square prisms considering interference effects,

    Z. Chen et al. , “Fluid –structure interaction on vibrating square prisms considering interference effects,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 35, no. 12, 2023

    2023

  22. [30]

    Effect of wingtip bending morphing on gust-induced aerodynamics based on fluid-structure interaction method,

    Y. Zheng, Y. Dai, C. Yang, Y. Li, and Y. Hu, “Effect of wingtip bending morphing on gust-induced aerodynamics based on fluid-structure interaction method,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 35, no. 11, 2023

    2023

  23. [31]

    Unsteady flow control mechanisms of a bio - inspired flexible flap with the fluid –structure interaction,

    J. Han, Y. Shui, L. Nie, and G. Chen, “Unsteady flow control mechanisms of a bio - inspired flexible flap with the fluid –structure interaction,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 35, no. 5, 2023

    2023

  24. [32]

    Wake -induced vibration of an elastic plate submerged in the wake of tandem circular cylinders,

    J. F. Derakhshandeh, “Wake -induced vibration of an elastic plate submerged in the wake of tandem circular cylinders,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 36, no. 3, 2024

    2024

  25. [33]

    Flow -induced response and wake characteristics of a flexible splitter plate attached to a circular cylinder in laminar flow,

    H. Zhu, Q. Chen, T. Tang, M. M. Alam, T. Zhou, and J. Zhong, “Flow -induced response and wake characteristics of a flexible splitter plate attached to a circular cylinder in laminar flow,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 35, no. 12, 2023

    2023

  26. [34]

    Bend -Twist Coupled Carbon -Fiber Laminate Beams: Fundamental Behavior and Applications,

    P. F. Babuska, “Bend -Twist Coupled Carbon -Fiber Laminate Beams: Fundamental Behavior and Applications,” Thesis (Master’s) --University of Washington, 2017 -08, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/handle/1773/40529

    2017

  27. [35]

    Computationally efficient optimal design of hygrothermally stable laminate with bend –twist coupling by analytical and numerical strategy,

    N. K. Shakya and S. S. Pa dhee, “Computationally efficient optimal design of hygrothermally stable laminate with bend –twist coupling by analytical and numerical strategy,” Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. , vol. 170, no. November 2022, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107546

    2022

  28. [36]

    Effect of spanwise flexibility on flapping wing propulsion,

    S. Heathcote, Z. Wang, and I. Gursul, “Effect of spanwise flexibility on flapping wing propulsion,” J. Fluids Struct. , vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 183 –199, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2007.08.003

    2008 doi

  29. [37]

    High -fidelity aeroelastic computations of a flapping wing with spanwise flexibility,

    R. E. Gordnier, S. K. Chimakurthi, C. E. S. Cesnik, and P. J. Attar, “High -fidelity aeroelastic computations of a flapping wing with spanwise flexibility,” J. Fluids 20 Struct., vol. 40, pp. 86–104, 2013

    2013

  30. [38]

    P. J. Kunz, Aerodynamics and design for ultra -low Reynolds number flight . Stanford University, 2003

    2003

  31. [39]

    A mixed -time-scale SGS model with fixed model-parameters for practical LES,

    M. Inagaki, T. Kondoh, and Y. Nagano, “A mixed -time-scale SGS model with fixed model-parameters for practical LES,” J. Fluids Eng., vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2005

    2005

  32. [40]

    Modelling the effect of freestream turbulence on dynamic stall of wind turbine blades,

    Y. Kim and Z.-T. Xie, “Modelling the effect of freestream turbulence on dynamic stall of wind turbine blades,” Comput. Fluids, vol. 129, pp. 53–66, 2016

    2016

  33. [41]

    Three - dimensional simulation for fast forward flight of a calliope hummingbird,

    J. Song, B. W. Tobalske, D. R. Powers, T. L. Hedrick, and H. Luo, “Three - dimensional simulation for fast forward flight of a calliope hummingbird,” R. Soc. open Sci., vol. 3, no. 6, p. 160230, 2016

    2016

  34. [42]

    Aerodynamics of bird flight,

    R. Dvořák, “Aerodynamics of bird flight,” in EPJ Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, 2016, p. 1001

    2016

  35. [43]

    ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide, Release 18.0. Ansys,

    A. Fluent, “ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide, Release 18.0. Ansys,” Inc. Canonsburg, PA, USA, 2017

    2017

  36. [44]

    A fluid mechanicians view of wind engineering: Large eddy simulation of flow past a cubic obstacle,

    K. B. Shah and J. H. Ferzi ger, “A fluid mechanicians view of wind engineering: Large eddy simulation of flow past a cubic obstacle,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., vol. 67, pp. 211–224, 1997

    1997

  37. [45]

    ERCOFTAC/IAHR/COST workshop on refined flow modeling,

    K. Hanjalic and S. Obi, “ERCOFTAC/IAHR/COST workshop on refined flow modeling,” Delft Univ. Technol., 1997

    1997

  38. [46]

    Numerical simulation of flapping wing aerodynamic performance under gust wind conditions,

    T. Wan and C. Huang, “Numerical simulation of flapping wing aerodynamic performance under gust wind conditions,” in 26th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, 2008, pp. 1–11

    2008

  39. [47]

    Numerical simulation of bending and length -varying flapping wing using discrete vortex method,

    R. Kumar and D. Samanta, “Numerical simulation of bending and length -varying flapping wing using discrete vortex method,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. C , vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1–30, 2024, doi: 10.1142/S0129183124500670

    2024 doi

  40. [48]

    Global optimization of actively morphing flapping wings,

    M. Ghommem et al., “Global optimization of actively morphing flapping wings,” J. Fluids Struct., vol. 33, pp. 210–228, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2012.04.013

    2012 doi

  41. [49]

    Object -oriented unsteady vortex lattice method for flapping flight,

    T. E. Fritz and L. N. Long, “Object -oriented unsteady vortex lattice method for flapping flight,” J. Aircr., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1275–1290, 2004, doi: 10.2514/1.7357

    2004 doi

  42. [50]

    Lift and Thrust Characteristics of Flapping Wing Aerial Vehicle with Pitching and Flapping Motion,

    C. Yu, D. Kim, and Y. Zhao, “Lift and Thrust Characteristics of Flapping Wing Aerial Vehicle with Pitching and Flapping Motion,” J. Appl. Math. Phys., vol. 02, no. 12, pp. 1031–1038, 2014, doi: 10.4236/jamp.2014.212117

    2014

  43. [51]

    Comparison of 2D finite element modeling assumptions with results from 3D analysis for composite skin - stiffener debonding,

    R. Krueger, I. L. Pari s, T. K. O’Brien, and P. J. Minguet, “Comparison of 2D finite element modeling assumptions with results from 3D analysis for composite skin - stiffener debonding,” Compos. Struct., vol. 57, no. 1–4, pp. 161–168, 2002

    2002

  44. [52]

    Z., W., Gursul, I.: Effect of spanwise flexibility on flapping wing propulsion,

    S. Heathcote, “Z., W., Gursul, I.: Effect of spanwise flexibility on flapping wing propulsion,” J. Fluids Struct., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 183–199, 2008

    2008

  45. [53]

    SDM 2013 student papers competition passive gust load alleviation through bend -twist coupling of composite beams on typical commercial airplane wings,

    S. Gauthier -Perron and M. Drelay, “SDM 2013 student papers competition passive gust load alleviation through bend -twist coupling of composite beams on typical commercial airplane wings,” 54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Struct. Struct. Dyn. Mater. Conf., 2013, doi: 10.2514/6.2013-1490

    2013 doi

  46. [54]

    A generalized von Mises criterion for yield and fracture,

    W. Yang, “A generalized von Mises criterion for yield and fracture,” 1980

    1980

  47. [55]

    Stress Analysis of Composite Aircraft Wing using Coupled Fluid-Structural Analysis,

    J. S. M. Ali and S. S. B. Haron, “Stress Analysis of Composite Aircraft Wing using Coupled Fluid-Structural Analysis,” CFD Lett., vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 78 –86, 2021, doi: 10.37934/cfdl.13.11.7886

    2021 doi

  48. [56]

    Learning from bat: aerodyn amics of actively morphing wing,

    Y. Yu and Z. Guan, “Learning from bat: aerodyn amics of actively morphing wing,” Theor. Appl. Mech. Lett., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 13–15, 2015

    2015

  49. [57]

    Unsteady aerodynamic model of flexible flapping wing,

    S. Chen, H. Li, S. Guo, M. Tong, and B. Ji, “Unsteady aerodynamic model of flexible flapping wing,” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. , vol. 80, pp. 354 –367, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.07.017. 21

    2018 doi

  50. [58]

    Vertebrate Flight, volume 27 de Zoophysiology

    U. M. Norberg, “Vertebrate Flight, volume 27 de Zoophysiology.” Springer -Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1990

    1990

  51. [59]

    Power requirements for horizontal flight in the pigeon Columba livia,

    C. J. Pennycuick, “Power requirements for horizontal flight in the pigeon Columba livia,” J. Exp. Biol., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 527–555, 1968

    1968

  52. [60]

    Unsteady airfoils,

    W. J. McCroskey, “Unsteady airfoils,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 285–311, 1982

    1982

  53. [61]

    Experiments and numerical simulations on hovering three -dimensional flexible flapping wings,

    D. Diaz -Arriba, T. Jardin, N. Gourdain, F. Pons, and L. David, “Experiments and numerical simulations on hovering three -dimensional flexible flapping wings,” Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, vol. 17, no. 6, 2022, doi: 10.1088/1748-3190/ac8f06

    2022 doi

  54. [62]

    Effects of wing deformation on aerodynamic forces in hovering hoverflies,

    G. Du and M. Sun, “Effects of wing deformation on aerodynamic forces in hovering hoverflies,” J. Exp. Biol., vol. 213, no. 13, pp. 2273–2283, 2010

    2010

  55. [63]

    Flight wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight,

    M. H. Dickinson, F. O. Lehmann, and S. P. Sane, “Flight wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight,” Science (80 -. ). , vol. 284, no. 5422, pp. 1954 – 1960, 1999

    1954

  56. [64]

    Resonance of flexible flapping wings at low Reynolds number,

    H. Masoud and A. Alexeev, “Resonance of flexible flapping wings at low Reynolds number,” Phys. Rev. E - Stat. Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys. , vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 1 –5, 2010, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.056304

    2010 doi

  57. [65]

    Mechanisms for generating coherent packets of ha irpin vortices in channel flow,

    J. Zhou, R. J. Adrian, S. Balachandar, and T. Kendall, “Mechanisms for generating coherent packets of ha irpin vortices in channel flow,” J. Fluid Mech. , vol. 387, pp. 353–396, 1999

    1999

  58. [66]

    Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows,

    J. C. R. Hunt, A. A. Wray, and P. Moin, “Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows,” Stud. Turbul. using Numer. Simul. databases, 2. Proc. 1988 summer Progr., 1988

    1988

  59. [67]

    Vortices behavior depending on the aspect ratio of an insect-like flapping wing in hover,

    J.-S. Han, J. W. Chang, and H. -K. Cho, “Vortices behavior depending on the aspect ratio of an insect-like flapping wing in hover,” Exp. Fluids, vol. 56, pp. 1–16, 2015

    2015

  60. [68]

    Can tip vortices enhance lift of a flapping wing?,

    W. Shyy, P. Trizila, C. Kang, and H. Aono, “Can tip vortices enhance lift of a flapping wing?,” AIAA J., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 289–293, 2009. 22 Supplementary section Lift augmentation by incorporating bend twist coupled composites in flapping wing Rahul Kumar a, Devranjan Saman...

    2009

  61. [69]

    Pressure distribution on the upper and lower surfaces Upper Surface Lower Surface Bending wing BTC wing Fig. SI-I. Pressure distribution contours at various times throughout the flapping cycle. The first row shows the vorticity contours for the bending wing, while the second r...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.