Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 84 references

Complemented subspaces of Banach lattices

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that the Complemented Subspace Problem for Banach lattices has a negative answer: the 1-complemented subspace PS2 of a C(K)-space is not linearly isomorphic to any Banach lattice, and the proof turns on a no-modulus…

desk verdict A well-written survey with sound new free-Banach-lattice propositions; the headline negative solution to the CSP is an external result from [38], so treat it as conditional. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.24084 v2 pith:UDUGA73P submitted 2025-05-30 math.FA

classification math.FA MSC 46B4246B03
keywords BanachlatticecomplementedsubspacefreeC(K)-spaceAM-spaceProblemJohnson-LindenstraussconstructionL-infinityspace
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The Complemented Subspace Problem for Banach lattices asks whether every complemented subspace of a Banach lattice must itself be linearly isomorphic to a Banach lattice. This survey reports a negative solution: a space PS2 built inside a $C(K)$-space is 1-complemented there, yet cannot carry any Banach lattice structure. The paper sketches the local-theory reduction: because PS2 has a countable norming set and is an $L_\infty$-space, a Banach lattice structure would force it to be a sublattice of $\ell_\infty$, where every element has a modulus with respect to any norming sequence of functionals. The construction produces, for every such norming sequence, a vector $1_{B_\xi^0} - 1_{B_\xi^1}$ that has no modulus, and that is the obstruction. The paper also positions free Banach lattices as a canonical place to study such questions, giving the criterion that a Banach space is isomorphic to a Banach lattice exactly when its free Banach lattice splits as $\delta_E(E) \oplus I$ for some ideal $I$.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the 'no modulus with respect to a norming sequence' obstruction. Given a norming sequence $(e_n^*)_{n=1}^\infty \subset B_{PS_2^*}$, a modulus of $f \in PS_2$ would be a $g \in PS_2$ with $|e_n^*(f)| = e_n^*(g)$ for every $n$; any sublattice of $\ell_\infty$ supplies such a $g$, namely $|f|$. The theorem from [38] that carries the paper's headline is that for every norming sequence there is some $\xi < \mathfrak{c}$ for which $f = 1_{B_\xi^0} - 1_{B_\xi^1}$ has no modulus. The paper's supporting machinery is the free Banach lattice $\mathrm{FBL}[E]$ with its universal property: Proposition 3.3 turns 'E is isomorphic to a Banach lattice' into the existence of an ideal $I$ with $\mathrm{FBL}[E] = \delta_E(E) \oplus I$, and Section 3 uses this to give criteria in terms of lattice homomorphisms and sets of zeros in $\mathrm{FBL}^{(\infty)}[E] = C_{ph}(B_{E^*})$.

What would settle it

Find one norming sequence $(e_n^*)_{n=1}^\infty$ in $B_{PS_2^*}$ such that for every $\xi < \mathfrak{c}$ there exists $g_\xi \in PS_2$ with $|e_n^*(1_{B_\xi^0} - 1_{B_\xi^1})| = e_n^*(g_\xi)$ for all $n$; under the paper's own reduction this would give PS2 a sublattice-of-$\ell_\infty$ structure and disprove the load-bearing non-isomorphism statement.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the space $PS_2$, the kernel of a norm-one averaging projection $P$ on the space $JL(\mathcal{B})$, is a 1-complemented subspace of a $C(K)$-space and is not linearly isomorphic to any Banach lattice. In the paper's telling, the argument runs through three reductions: $PS_2$ is an isomorphic predual of $\ell_1(\Gamma)$ and hence an $L_\infty$-space; any Banach lattice structure on it would therefore have to be an AM-space structure, and because $PS_2$ has a countable norming set in its dual ball, it would have to embed as a sublattice of $\ell_\infty$; but the built-in indicator differences $1_{B_\xi^0} - 1_{B_\xi^1}$ have no modulus with respect to any norming sequence in $B_{PS_2^*}$, so no such embedding exists. The manuscript states that this final no-modulus step is proved in [38, Theorem 4.4] and only outlines the route here.

Load-bearing premise

The headline result rests on the theorem cited as [38, Theorem 4.4], namely that every norming sequence in the dual ball of $PS_2$ is defeated by some vector $1_{B_\xi^0} - 1_{B_\xi^1}$ that has no modulus; this survey describes that theorem but does not prove it, so the main conclusion falls if the cited preprint's proof does not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the cited theorem is correct, the Complemented Subspace Problem for Banach lattices has a negative answer in the non-separable setting, while its separable version remains open.
  • PS2 is a single example that answers two classical problems at once: it is a 1-complemented subspace of a $C(K)$-space and is neither isomorphic to a $C(K)$-space nor to any Banach lattice.
  • A slight modification of PS2 also gives a 1-complemented subspace of a complex Banach lattice that is not linearly isomorphic to any complex Banach lattice, so the complex version of the problem fails as well.
  • The free-Banach-lattice criterion reduces the question of whether a space $E$ is a Banach lattice to a splitting condition: $\mathrm{FBL}[E] = \delta_E(E) \oplus I$ for some closed ideal $I$, giving a new way to certify non-lattice spaces.
  • PS2 cannot be a hyperplane of any Banach lattice: if $PS_2 \oplus_\infty \mathbb{R}$ were a Banach lattice, the hyperplanes of that AM-space would themselves be Banach lattices, forcing PS2 to be one.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same modulus obstruction could be used as a detection test on other $L_\infty$-spaces with countable norming sets: search for a norming sequence for which every candidate indicator difference has a modulus, which would indicate that the space is, after all, a sublattice of $\ell_\infty$.
  • Because the construction is inherently non-separable, using an almost disjoint family of cardinality continuum, it gives no direct recipe for the still-open separable case; a separable counterexample, if one exists, would need a different source of no-modulus vectors.
  • The ideal-splitting criterion suggests operationalizing the Hyperplane Problem for Banach lattices: a hyperplane of a Banach lattice is a lattice exactly when the corresponding evaluation kernel on $\mathrm{FBL}$ can be complemented by an ideal, and Proposition 6.5 already gives four equivalent forms of this condition.
  • If the external theorem from [38] fails, most of the survey's headline consequences would collapse, but the free-Banach-lattice criteria in Section 3 would remain intact as structural results independent of PS2.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper is a research survey on complemented subspaces of Banach lattices. Its announced centrepiece is the recent negative solution of the Complemented Subspace Problem: the space PS2, a 1-complemented subspace of a C(K)-space due to Plebanek and Salguero-Alarcón, is not linearly isomorphic to any Banach lattice. The paper sketches PS2 and the reduction used in the companion paper [38], then develops a free-Banach-lattice toolbox: complementability in FBL[E] (Prop. 3.1), an ideal-decomposition criterion for being isomorphic to a Banach lattice (Prop. 3.3), descriptions of ideals in Cph(BE*) and AM-space characterizations (Prop. 3.6, Cor. 3.7), and transfer principles for lattice homomorphisms (Props. 3.8–3.11). Later sections treat projection constants, complementation in Banach lattices with extra properties, hyperplanes in Banach lattices, and several open problems. The paper proves a number of original propositions, including Props. 4.1, 4.2, 5.9, 6.4, and 6.5.

Significance. If the theorem it relies on is correct, the paper announces a major development: a 1-complemented subspace of a C(K)-space that is not isomorphic to any Banach lattice, giving a negative solution to the Complemented Subspace Problem for Banach lattices. The free-Banach-lattice criteria (Prop. 3.3, Cor. 3.7, Prop. 3.10) are elegant and likely to be useful, and the survey is careful in attributing the counterexample to [73] and [38]. The original propositions are proved in detail with standard machinery, and the open problems are well motivated. The evident weakness is that the headline counterexample is not proved here: Section 2.2 explicitly defers the decisive modulus argument to the external preprint [38], so the main advertised result is conditional on that source.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 2.2] The central claim that PS2 is not linearly isomorphic to any Banach lattice is not established in this text. The paper reduces the problem to the assertion that for every norming sequence (e_n*) in the dual ball of PS2 there is xi < c such that w_xi = 1_{Bxi^0} - 1_{Bxi^1} has no modulus with respect to that sequence, but the proof of this assertion is contained only in [38, Theorem 4.4] and is described as 'a careful analysis'. Since the equivalence between being isomorphic to a sublattice of l_infinity and satisfying the modulus condition is also cited from [38, Proposition 4.1], the reader cannot verify the main theorem from the present manuscript. Please include a complete proof of the modulus assertion, or explicitly frame the negative solution as an external surveyed result and make the manuscript's own contributions the free-Banach-lattice results.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.1] The symbol JL(A) is reused for the modified subspace of l_infinity(bN) after having been defined as a subspace of l_infinity; although the paper alerts the reader, a distinct symbol would avoid confusion.
  2. [Section 2.2] The identification of PS2 with the space X = ker P from Section 2.1 is never made explicit; please state directly that PS2 is this space before discussing the vectors 1_{Bxi^0} - 1_{Bxi^1}.
  3. [Section 4, Proposition 4.1] The assertion that James space J and J** cannot be isomorphic to any complemented subspace of a Banach lattice is used in the contradiction but is not accompanied by a proof or reference; please supply a citation (for instance to [52] or [30]).
  4. [Section 5, proof of Proposition 5.9] The symbol 'FVL[E]' appears where FBL[E] is intended, and the notation for the projection P and its lattice-homomorphic extension is conflated in step (2); please clarify.
  5. [Section 3, Lemma 3.5] In the display after equation (3.1), the two norms in the middle of the chain are identical; likely one of them should be the quotient norm, so the chain should be rewritten for clarity.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The survey's headline negative solution to the CSP is imported from the authors' own companion preprint [38, Theorem 4.4]; the rest of the paper's free-Banach-lattice results are independently derived.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 2.2, paragraph 'PS2 is not isomorphic to a Banach lattice']
    "A careful analysis of the construction of PS2 (explained in detail in [38, Theorem 4.4]) reveals that for every norming sequence in B_PS2^* there exists ξ < c such that 1_{B_ξ^0} − 1_{B_ξ^1} ∈ PS2 has no modulus with respect to that sequence, and hence PS2 cannot be isomorphic to a Banach lattice."

    The decisive step of the claimed negative solution to the Complemented Subspace Problem is not proved here; it is exactly the content of [38, Theorem 4.4], a companion preprint by two of the present authors. The survey's 'sketch' stops at the modulus-without-norming-sequence assertion and then draws the headline conclusion from it. Thus the central claim's only support in this text is a self-citation to an unproved-in-this-paper theorem, rather than a derivation from the definitions of PS2 or from independently established facts.

full rationale

No definitional circularity or fitted-input-called-prediction occurs: the free Banach lattice propositions (3.1, 3.3, 3.6, 3.7, 3.10, 3.11, 4.1-4.2, 5.9, 6.4, 6.5) are proved from the universal property of FBL and standard Banach lattice facts. The flagged step is the one load-bearing self-citation: the survey's headline result that PS2 is not isomorphic to any Banach lattice depends on [38, Theorem 4.4], whose key assertion about moduli with respect to norming sequences is referenced but not demonstrated. This is not a logical loop inside the paper, but it is a central claim whose only textual support is the authors' own companion preprint, so it warrants a moderate circularity score rather than zero.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central counterexample is taken from [38] without proof; the survey's new propositions rely on standard results about free Banach lattices and quotients of Banach lattices.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Universal property and functional representation of free Banach lattices FBL[E] from [9,41,68].
    Used throughout Section 3, e.g., Propositions 3.1, 3.3, 3.10; the survey does not reprove existence and relies on prior literature.
  • standard math Quotient of a Banach lattice over a norm-closed ideal is a Banach lattice.
    Used in Proposition 3.3 (converse) and Proposition 3.11; cited to Meyer-Nieberg [66, Corollary 1.3.14].
  • standard math Kakutani representation theorems identifying AM-spaces with sublattices of C(K) and AL-spaces with L1-spaces.
    Used to identify JL(A) as C(K) and to reduce PS2 to a sublattice of ell_infinity.
  • domain assumption PS2 is an L_infinity-space with a countable norming set, and [38, Corollary 2.2] that an L_infinity-space isomorphic to a Banach lattice is isomorphic to an AM-space.
    Load-bearing for reducing the non-isomorphism to non-existence of modulus; imported from [38] without proof in this text.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Complemented subspaces of Banach lattices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UDUGA73P

@misc{pith2026250524084,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Complemented subspaces of Banach lattices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UDUGA73P}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.24084}
}
abstract

We survey recent developments on the structure of complemented subspaces of Banach lattices, including in particular the construction of a complemented subspace of a $C(K)$-space which is not linearly isomorphic to any Banach lattice. Motivated by this, several natural questions and directions of future research are presented. We provide an approach to some of these problems using tools from the theory of free Banach lattices.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [38]

    de Hevia, G

    D. de Hevia, G. Mart ´ ınez-Cervantes, A. Salguero-Alarc´ on, and P. Tradacete,A negative solution to the complemented subspace problem for Banach lattices . Preprint

  2. [73]

    Plebanek and A

    G. Plebanek and A. Salguero Alarc´ on,The complemented subspace problem for C(K)-spaces: a coun- terexample. Adv. Math. 426 (2023), 109103, 20 pp. Paper

  3. [1]

    Y. A. Abramovich and C. D. Aliprantis, An invitation to operator theory , Graduate Studies in Math- ematics, vol. 50, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002. Book

  4. [2]

    Aharoni and J

    I. Aharoni and J. Lindenstrauss, Uniform equivalence between Banach spaces, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 84 (1978), no. 2 ,281–283. Paper

  5. [3]

    Albiac and N.J

    F. Albiac and N.J. Kalton, Topics in Banach Space Theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 233, 2nd edn. Springer, Cham (2016). Book

  6. [4]

    Aliprantis and O

    C.D. Aliprantis and O. Burkinshaw, Factoring compact and weakly compact operators through reflexive Banach lattices, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 283 (1984), 369–381. Paper

  7. [5]

    Alspach and Y

    D. Alspach and Y. Benyamini, Primariness of spaces of continuous functions on ordinals. Israel J. Math. 27 (1977), 64–92. Paper 26 DE HEVIA AND TRADACETE

  8. [6]

    Alspach and Y

    D.E. Alspach and Y. Benyamini, A geometrical property of C(K) spaces , Israel J. Math. 64 (1988), 179–194. Paper

Show all 84 references
  1. [7]

    Alspach, P

    D. Alspach, P. Enflo and E. Odell, On the structure of separable Lp spaces (1 < p <∞), Studia Math. 60 (1977), 79–90. Paper

  2. [8]

    Ando, Contractive projections in Lp spaces, Pacific J

    T. Ando, Contractive projections in Lp spaces, Pacific J. Math. 17 (1966), 391–405. Paper

  3. [9]

    Avil´ es, J

    A. Avil´ es, J. Rodr ´ ıguez and P. Tradacete,The free Banach lattice generated by a Banach space , J. Funct. Anal. 274 (2018), no. 10, 2955–2977. Paper

  4. [10]

    Benyamini, Separable G spaces are isomorphic to C(K) spaces , Israel J

    Y. Benyamini, Separable G spaces are isomorphic to C(K) spaces , Israel J. Math. 14 (1973), 287–293. Paper

  5. [11]

    Benyamini, An M-space which is not isomorphic to a C(K) space

    Y. Benyamini, An M-space which is not isomorphic to a C(K) space. Israel J. Math. 28 (1977), 98–102 (1977). Paper

  6. [12]

    Benyamini, P

    Y. Benyamini, P. Flinn and D. R. Lewis, A space without 1-unconditional basis which is 1- complemented in a space with 1-unconditional basis, in: Texas Functional Analysis Seminar 1983–84, Longhorn Notes, University of Texas Press, Austin, TX (1984), 145–149

  7. [13]

    Benyamini and J

    Y. Benyamini and J. Lindenstrauss, A predual of ℓ1 which is not isomorphic to a C(K) space. Israel J. Math. 13 (1972), 246–254. Paper

  8. [14]

    Bernau and H

    S. Bernau and H. E. Lacey, The range of a contractive projection on an Lp-space. Pacific J. Math. 53 (1974), 21–41. Paper

  9. [15]

    Bernau and H

    S. Bernau and H. E. Lacey, A local characterization of Banach lattices with order continuous norm , Studia Math. 58 (1976), 101–128. Paper

  10. [16]

    Bilokopytov, E

    E. Bilokopytov, E. Garc ´ ıa-S´ anchez, D. de Hevia, G. Mart ´ ınez-Cervantes and P. Tradacete,Norm- attaining lattice homomorphisms and renormings of Banach lattices . Preprint available on arXiv. Preprint

  11. [17]

    Bilokopytov and V.G

    E. Bilokopytov and V.G. Troitsky, Uniformly closed sublattices of finite codimension . Linear Multilin- ear Algebra (2023), 19 pp. Paper Preprint

  12. [18]

    Bourgain and F

    J. Bourgain and F. Delbaen, A class of special L∞ spaces. Acta Math. 145 (1980), 155–176. Paper

  13. [19]

    Bourgain, H

    J. Bourgain, H. P. Rosenthal, and G. Schechtman, An ordinal Lp-index for Banach spaces, with application to complemented subspaces of Lp. Ann. of Math. (2) 114 (1981), no. 2, 193–228. Paper

  14. [20]

    A. V. Bukhvalov, A. I. Veksler and G. Ya. Lozanovskii, Banach lattices - some Banach aspects of their theory. Russ. Math. Surv. 34 (1979), no. 2, 159–212. Paper

  15. [21]

    Casazza, N.J

    P.G. Casazza, N.J. Kalton, and L. Tzafriri, Decompositions of Banach lattices into direct sums, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 304 (1987), 771–800. Paper

  16. [22]

    Diestel, H

    J. Diestel, H. Jarchow and A. Tonge, Absolutely summing operators. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Math. 43, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995. Book

  17. [23]

    Douglas, Contractive projections on an L1 space, Pacific J

    R.G. Douglas, Contractive projections on an L1 space, Pacific J. Math. 15 (1965), 443–462. Paper

  18. [24]

    Drewnowski, A

    L. Drewnowski, A. Kami´ nska and P. Lin,On Multipliers and L- and M-Projections in Banach Lattices and K¨ othe Function Spaces.J. Math. Anal. Appl. 206 (1997), no. 1, 83–102. Paper

  19. [25]

    Dubinsky, A

    E. Dubinsky, A. Pe lczy´ nski and H. P. Rosenthal, On Banach spaces X for which Π2(L∞, X) = B(L∞, X), Studia Math. 44 (1972), 617–648. Paper

  20. [26]

    I. S. Edelstein, P. Wojtaszczyk, On projections and unconditional bases in direct sums of Banach spaces. Studia Math. 56 (1976), no. 3, 263–276. Paper

  21. [27]

    Enflo and T

    P. Enflo and T. Starbird, Subspaces of L1 containing L1. Studia Math. 65 (1979), 203–225. Paper

  22. [28]

    Fabian, P

    M. Fabian, P. Habala, P. H´ ajek, V. Montesinos Santaluc ´ ıa, J. Pelant and V. Zizler,Functional Analysis and Infinite-Dimensional Geometry , CMS Books in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag New York, 2001. Book

  23. [29]

    Figiel, N

    T. Figiel, N. Ghoussoub, N. and W.B. Johnson, On the structure of non-weakly compact operators on Banach lattices. Math. Ann. 257 (1981), 317–334. Paper

  24. [30]

    Figiel, W.B

    T. Figiel, W.B. Johnson, and L. Tzafriri, On Banach lattices and spaces having local unconditional structure, with applications to Lorentz function spaces , J. Approx. Theory 13 (1975), no. 4, 395–412. Paper

  25. [31]

    Flinn, On a theorem of N

    P. Flinn, On a theorem of N. J. Kalton and G. V. Wood concerning 1-complemented subspaces of spaces having an orthonormal basis, in: Texas Functional Analysis Seminar 1983–84, Longhorn Notes, University of Texas Press, Austin, TX (1984), 135–144

  26. [32]

    Flores, F

    J. Flores, F. L. Hern´ andez, E. Spinu, P. Tradacete, V. G. Troitsky, Disjointly homogeneous Banach lattices: duality and complementation. J. Funct. Anal. 266 (2014), No. 9, 5858–5885. Paper COMPLEMENTED SUBSPACES OF BANACH LATTICES 27

  27. [33]

    Ghoussoub, On spaces with local unconditional structure , S´ eminaire d’analyse fonctionnelle (Poly- technique) (1979-1980), exp

    N. Ghoussoub, On spaces with local unconditional structure , S´ eminaire d’analyse fonctionnelle (Poly- technique) (1979-1980), exp. no 24, p. 1–8. Paper

  28. [34]

    Gordon and D.R

    Y. Gordon and D.R. Lewis, Absolutely summing operators and local unconditional structures , Acta Math. 133 (1974), 27–48. Paper

  29. [35]

    W. T. Gowers, A solution to Banach’s hyperplane problem , Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 26 (1994), 523–530. Paper

  30. [36]

    W. T. Gowers and B. Maurey, The unconditional basic sequence problem. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 6 (1993), no. 4, 851–874. Paper

  31. [37]

    Heinrich, C.W

    S. Heinrich, C.W. Henson and L. C. Moore, Elementary equivalence of L1-preduals. In: Banach Space Theory and its Applications. Lecture Notes in Math. 991. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1983), 79–90. Paper

  32. [39]

    de Hevia and P

    D. de Hevia and P. Tradacete, Free complex Banach lattices , J. Funct. Anal. 284 (2023), 109888. Paper Preprint

  33. [40]

    James, A Non-Reflexive Banach Space Isometric with Its Second Conjugate Space

    R.C. James, A Non-Reflexive Banach Space Isometric with Its Second Conjugate Space. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 37 (1951), no. 3, 174–177. Paper

  34. [41]

    Jard´ on-S´ anchez, N.J

    H. Jard´ on-S´ anchez, N.J. Laustsen, M.A. Taylor, P. Tradacete, and V.G. Troitsky.Free Banach lattices under convexity conditions , RACSAM 116 (2022). Paper

  35. [42]

    Johnson, On finite dimensional subspaces of Banach spaces with local unconditional structure

    W.B. Johnson, On finite dimensional subspaces of Banach spaces with local unconditional structure. Studia Math. 51 (1974), no. 3, 225–240. Paper

  36. [43]

    Johnson, J

    W.B. Johnson, J. Lindenstrauss, Some remarks on weakly compactly generated Banach spaces. Israel J. Math. 17 (1974), 219–230. Paper

  37. [44]

    Johnson, J

    W.B. Johnson, J. Lindenstrauss and G. Schechtman, On the relation between several notions of un- conditional structure. Israel J. Math. 37 (1980), 120–129. Paper

  38. [45]

    W. B. Johnson, L. Tzafriri, Some more Banach spaces which do not have local unconditional structure Houston J. Math. 3 (1977), no. 1, 55-60

  39. [46]

    Kalton, Hermitian operators on complex Banach lattices and a problem of Garth Dales

    N.J. Kalton, Hermitian operators on complex Banach lattices and a problem of Garth Dales . J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 86 (2012), 641–656. Paper

  40. [47]

    Kalton and N.T

    N.J. Kalton and N.T. Peck, Twisted Sums of Sequence Spaces and the Three Space Problem , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 255 (1979), 1–30. Paper

  41. [48]

    N. J. Kalton and G. V. Wood, Orthonormal systems in Banach spaces and their applications . Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 79 (1976), 493–510. Paper

  42. [49]

    Koszmider, Banach spaces of continuous functions with few operators

    P. Koszmider, Banach spaces of continuous functions with few operators. Math. Ann. 330 (2004), 151–183. Paper

  43. [50]

    Koszmider, A survey on Banach spaces C(K) with few operators

    P. Koszmider, A survey on Banach spaces C(K) with few operators. RACSAM 104 (2010), 309–326. Paper

  44. [51]

    H. E. Lacey, The isometric theory of classical Banach spaces , Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1974. Book

  45. [52]

    Lacey, Local unconditional structure in Banach spaces

    H.E. Lacey, Local unconditional structure in Banach spaces. In: Baker, J., Cleaver, C., Diestel, J. (eds) Banach Spaces of Analytic Functions. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol 604 (1977), 44–56. Paper

  46. [53]

    Koszmider and N.J

    P. Koszmider and N.J. Laustsen, A Banach space induced by an almost disjoint family, admitting only few operators and decompositions. Adv. Math. 381 (2021), 107613, 39 pp. Paper

  47. [54]

    D. R. Lewis, Ellipsoids defined by Banach ideal norms , Mathematika 26 (1979), 18–29. Paper

  48. [55]

    Lindenstrauss, Extension of compact operators , Mem

    J. Lindenstrauss, Extension of compact operators , Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 48 (1964), 112 pp

  49. [56]

    Lindenstrauss, On complemented subspaces of m

    J. Lindenstrauss, On complemented subspaces of m. Israel J. Math. 5 (1967), 153–156 (1967). Paper

  50. [57]

    Lindenstrauss, A remark on symmetric bases

    J. Lindenstrauss, A remark on symmetric bases. Israel J. Math. 13 (1972), 317–320. Paper

  51. [58]

    Lindenstrauss and A

    J. Lindenstrauss and A. Pe lczy´ nski,Absolutely summing operators in Lp-spaces and their applications. Studia Math. 29 (1968), 275–326. Paper

  52. [59]

    Lindenstrauss and A

    J. Lindenstrauss and A. Pe lczy´ nski, Contributions to the theory of the classical Banach spaces , J. Funct. Anal. 8 (1971), 225–249. Paper

  53. [60]

    Lindenstrauss and H.P

    J. Lindenstrauss and H.P. Rosenthal, The Lp spaces, Israel J. Math. 7 (1969) 325–349. Paper

  54. [61]

    Lindenstrauss and L

    J. Lindenstrauss and L. Tzafriri, Classical Banach spaces, Lecture Notes in Math. 338 Springer-Verlag Berlin, 1973. Book

  55. [62]

    Lindenstrauss and L

    J. Lindenstrauss and L. Tzafriri, Classical Banach Spaces I: Sequence spaces , Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1977. 28 DE HEVIA AND TRADACETE

  56. [63]

    Lindenstrauss and L

    J. Lindenstrauss and L. Tzafriri, Classical Banach Spaces II: Function spaces , Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1979

  57. [64]

    Lindenstrauss and D.E

    J. Lindenstrauss and D.E. Wulbert, On the classification of the Banach spaces whose duals are L1 spaces, J. Funct. Anal. 4 (1969), 332–349. Paper

  58. [65]

    Maurey, Sous-espaces compl´ ement´ es deLP , d’apr` es P

    B. Maurey, Sous-espaces compl´ ement´ es deLP , d’apr` es P. Enflo.S´ eminaire Maurey-Schwartz (1974- 1975), Expos´ e no. 3, 14 p. Paper

  59. [66]

    Meyer-Nieberg, Banach lattices, Universitext, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991

    P. Meyer-Nieberg, Banach lattices, Universitext, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991. Book

  60. [67]

    Oikhberg, Geometry of unit balls of free Banach lattices, and its applications , J

    T. Oikhberg, Geometry of unit balls of free Banach lattices, and its applications , J. Funct. Anal. 286 (2004), 110351. Paper

  61. [68]

    Oikhberg, M.A

    T. Oikhberg, M.A. Taylor, P. Tradacete, and V.G. Troitsky. Free Banach lattices. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) (2024), 128 pp. Paper Preprint

  62. [69]

    Pe lczy´ nski,Projections in certain Banach spaces

    A. Pe lczy´ nski,Projections in certain Banach spaces. Studia Math. 19 (1960), 209–228. Paper

  63. [70]

    Pe lczy´ nski,Sur certaines propri´ et´ es isomorphiques nouvelles des espaces de Banach de fonctions holomorphes A et H ∞

    A. Pe lczy´ nski,Sur certaines propri´ et´ es isomorphiques nouvelles des espaces de Banach de fonctions holomorphes A et H ∞. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S´ er. A279 (1974), 9–12

  64. [71]

    Plebanek, A construction of a Banach space C(K) with few operators, Topology Appl

    G. Plebanek, A construction of a Banach space C(K) with few operators, Topology Appl. 143 (2004), 217–239. Paper

  65. [72]

    Plebanek and A

    G. Plebanek and A. Salguero Alarc´ on, On the three space property for C(K)-spaces. J. Funct. Anal. 281 (2021), 109193. Paper

  66. [74]

    Randrianantoanina, Norm one projections in Banach spaces , Taiwanese J

    B. Randrianantoanina, Norm one projections in Banach spaces , Taiwanese J. Math. 5 (2001), 35–95. Paper Preprint

  67. [75]

    Raynaud, The Range of a Contractive Projection in Lp(H)

    Y. Raynaud, The Range of a Contractive Projection in Lp(H). Rev. Mat. Complut. 17 (2004), 485–

  68. [76]

    Rosenthal, On factors of C([0, 1]) with non-separable dual , Israel J

    H.P. Rosenthal, On factors of C([0, 1]) with non-separable dual , Israel J. Math. 13 (1972), 361–378. Paper

  69. [77]

    H.P. Rosenthal, On one-complemented subspaces of complex Banach spaces with a one-unconditional basis, according to Kalton and Wood, Israel Seminar on Geometrical Aspects of Functional Analysis 1983–1984, Tel Aviv Univ., Tel Aviv, 1984, pp. IX, 16

  70. [78]

    H. P. Rosenthal, The Banach spaces C(K). Handbook of the Geometry of Banach spaces, vol. 2, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2003, 1547–1602. Paper

  71. [79]

    Samuel, Sur certains espaces Cσ(S) et sur les sous-espaces compl´ ement´ es deC(S)

    C. Samuel, Sur certains espaces Cσ(S) et sur les sous-espaces compl´ ement´ es deC(S). Bull. Sci. Math. Ser. II 95 (1971), 65–82

  72. [80]

    Szankowski, A Banach lattice without the approximation property

    A. Szankowski, A Banach lattice without the approximation property . Israel J. Math. 24 (1976), 329-

  73. [81]

    Tomczak-Jaegermann

    N. Tomczak-Jaegermann. Banach-Mazur distances and finite-dimensional operator ideals , volume 38 of Pitman Monographs and Surveys in Pure and Applied Mathematics. Longman Scientific and Tech- nical, Harlow; copublished in the United States with John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New Y...

  74. [82]

    Tzafriri, Remarks on contractive projections in Lp-spaces

    L. Tzafriri, Remarks on contractive projections in Lp-spaces. Israel J. Math. 7 (1969), 9–15. Paper

  75. [83]

    Tzafriri, Reflexivity in Banach lattices and their subspaces , J

    L. Tzafriri, Reflexivity in Banach lattices and their subspaces , J. Funct. Anal. 10 (1972), no. 1, 1–18. Paper

  76. [84]

    Wojtaszczyk, On projections and unconditional bases in direct sums of Banach spaces

    P. Wojtaszczyk, On projections and unconditional bases in direct sums of Banach spaces. II Studia Math. 62 (1978), no. 2, 193–201. Paper Instituto de Ciencias Matem ´aticas (CSIC-UAM-UC3M-UCM), Consejo Superior de In- vestigaciones Cient´ıficas, C/ Nicol ´as Cabrera, 13–15, Ca...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.