Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 85 references

Long-term investigation of an open cluster Berkeley 65

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A decade of optical monitoring of the open cluster Berkeley 65 shows that it is losing low-mass stars and is being disrupted by external tidal forces, with a photometric mass of about 164 solar masses far below its dynamical mass of about…

desk verdict Solid new data on a neglected cluster, but the disruption claim rests on an assumed velocity dispersion and a circular tidal radius—needs to be reframed as tentative. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.24240 v1 pith:5BRUMM7K submitted 2025-05-30 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

Tarak Chand , Saurabh Sharma , Koshvendra Singh , Jeewan Pandey , Aayushi Verma , Harmeen Kaur , Mamta , Manojit Chakraborty
show 2 more authors
Devendra K. Ojha Ajay Kumar Singh
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GA
keywords openclusterBerkeley65photometricmonitoringvariablestarsmassfunctionsegregationdynamicaldisruptionGalacticplane
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that Berkeley 65, a poorly studied open cluster in the Galactic plane, is caught in the act of dissolving. Its present-day stellar mass, about $164\,M_\odot$ within the tidal radius, is far smaller than the $5581\,M_\odot$ dynamical mass implied by its assumed internal velocity dispersion, and its mass function turns over near $1.7\,M_\odot$, pointing to the escape of low-mass stars. The cluster sits at $2.0\pm0.1$ kpc with an age of roughly 160 Myr, about thirty times its dynamical relaxation time, so the observed central concentration of massive stars is attributed to internal dynamical evolution. The same decade-long photometric monitoring yields 64 periodic and 16 non-periodic variable stars, spanning pulsating main-sequence stars, rotating BY Draconis-type stars, and one detached eclipsing binary; if the disruption claim is correct, Be 65 becomes a nearby example of a cluster feeding stars into the Galactic field.

What carries the argument

The comparison between two masses is the argument's engine. The photometric mass ($\sim164\,M_\odot$) is built by converting the completeness-corrected luminosity function into masses with a 160 Myr isochrone; the dynamical mass ($\sim5581\,M_\odot$) comes from the virial estimate $M_{\rm dyn}\sim r_t\,\sigma_{3D}^2/G$, using a tidal radius of $\sim6.3$ pc that was itself derived from the photometric mass and an assumed 1D velocity dispersion of $1$ km s$^{-1}$ from other open clusters, with $\sigma_{3D}^2=3\sigma^2$ for an isotropic velocity distribution. The mass-function break at $\sim1.7\,M_\odot$ is the second load-bearing mechanism, providing independent evidence that low-mass stars are missing. The ratio of the two masses is what turns a photometric description of the cluster into a dynamical statement about disruption.

What would settle it

Measure radial velocities for a few dozen of the 540 proper-motion members of Be 65. If the observed one-dimensional dispersion is near $1$ km s$^{-1}$, the dynamical-mass gap of roughly a factor of 34 stands; if it is below $\sim0.3$ km s$^{-1}$, the dynamical mass falls below the photometric mass and the disruption claim collapses. A second check is to compare the cluster's proper-motion distribution with the expectations for an isotropic, bound cluster: a resolved tidal tail or a radially expanding velocity pattern would confirm ongoing disruption, while a compact, round distribution with no tail would weaken it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that Be 65 is a dynamically evolved, mass-segregated cluster that has already lost a substantial fraction of its stellar mass and is now being disrupted by external forces. The evidence is a mass-function break at $\sim1.7\,M_\odot$, with a steep slope of $-2.52\pm0.15$ above the break and a rising slope of $+1.27\pm0.33$ below it, indicating a deficit of low-mass stars; a mass-segregation ratio of $1.1\pm1.2$; a relaxation time of $\sim4.4$ Myr (at most $\sim7.5$ Myr after allowing 50% incompleteness) against a cluster age of $\sim160$ Myr; and a photometric mass of $\sim164\,M_\odot$ inside the tidal radius compared with a dynamical mass of $\sim5581\,M_\odot$ from $M_{\rm dyn}\sim r_t\,\sigma_{3D}^2/G$ using a 1D velocity dispersion of $1$ km s$^{-1}$. The authors conclude that low-mass stars have been escaping, that the cluster has lost much of its binding mass, and that external perturbations accelerated its demise relative to internal evaporation alone.

Load-bearing premise

The disruption claim rests on assuming that Be 65's one-dimensional velocity dispersion is about $1$ km s$^{-1}$, a value taken from other open clusters rather than measured for Be 65, because the dynamical mass scales as the square of that dispersion; a lower measured dispersion would shrink the mass deficit, though the deficit would probably remain.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If Be 65 is disrupting, it will dissolve into the Galactic field well before its internal evaporation timescale of about 0.75 Gyr, making external tidal forces the dominant destruction mechanism.
  • The deficit of stars below $\sim1.7\,M_\odot$ should grow with time, so deeper photometry should reveal an increasingly depleted faint end compared with a bound cluster of the same age.
  • The variable-star population, including 26 probable BY Draconis-type rotators and a detached binary, gives future observers a set of cluster members whose rotation and activity can be tracked as the cluster weakens.
  • The cluster's morphology should become progressively more elongated and its surviving members more spread out, consistent with the aspect ratio of 1.1 and the dispersed members already seen beyond the cluster radius.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, I would expect the true velocity dispersion of Be 65 to be lower than 1 km s$^{-1}$ because the cluster is old and mass-segregated; even a factor-of-four reduction would still leave a mass deficit, so the qualitative disruption conclusion is likely robust to better kinematic data.
  • A testable extension is to search for tidal tails in the proper-motion catalog around Be 65; the paper's own finding of member variables scattered beyond the convex hull already hints that such structure exists.
  • A second extension is to compare the position of the $\sim1.7\,M_\odot$ mass-function break with those of other dissolving clusters of similar age; if the break follows the tidal truncation mass rather than the IMF, it is a dynamical fingerprint rather than a formation signature.
  • One could also use the 26 BY Draconis-type rotators as a dynamical clock: if the cluster is disrupting, their rotation-period distribution should be broader than in a bound cluster of the same age, because weakened binding permits more angular-momentum evolution.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a long-baseline optical photometric study of the poorly studied open cluster Berkeley 65 using ARIES/DFOT and ARIES/ST observations from 2005 to 2022, together with Gaia DR3 proper motions and 2MASS data. The authors derive a cluster radius of 1.6 arcmin, a distance of 2.0 +/- 0.1 kpc, a reddening E(B-V)=0.92 mag, an age of ~160 Myr, a present-day mass function with a break near 1.7 Msun, and a mass-segregation ratio consistent with a dynamically relaxed system. They also identify 80 variable stars, including 64 periodic variables, and classify them as SPB, delta Scuti, RR Lyrae, gamma Dor, rotating/BY Dra variables, non-pulsating variables, and one eclipsing binary. The paper's central claim is that Be65 is undergoing disruption, based on the comparison of photometric mass (~164 Msun) with a dynamical mass (~5581 Msun) estimated from an assumed 1 km/s velocity dispersion and a tidal radius of 6.3 pc.

Significance. If the disruption conclusion could be established, Be65 would be a useful example of an intermediate-age (160 Myr) disk cluster at 2 kpc that is dissolving under external tidal forces, with a rare long-baseline variable-star census. The paper's observational contribution is substantial: ~1200 V-band frames over 17 years, a standard calibration to the Landolt system, Gaia DR3-based membership probabilities for 540 stars, and artificial-star completeness corrections. However, the dynamical mass argument is not self-consistent and depends on an unmeasured velocity dispersion, and the RR Lyrae classification appears physically implausible for a 160 Myr cluster. As it stands, the cluster parameters and variable catalog are likely useful, but the headline disruption claim is not yet supported.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.2, Eq. (3)] The disruption claim in Section 5 ('confirms that this cluster has lost stellar mass') rests entirely on the dynamical mass computed with an assumed 1D radial velocity dispersion of 1 km/s, taken from Girard et al. (1989) for M67 rather than measured for Be 65. Because Mdyn scales as sigma^2, a true dispersion near 0.2 km/s would reduce Mdyn to roughly 200 Msun, comparable to the photometric mass, while a dispersion of 2 km/s would increase it by a factor of four. The manuscript therefore overstates what an assumed dispersion can establish; either measure sigma from available Gaia DR3 radial velocities or present the mass deficit as explicitly conditional on the assumed dispersion.
  2. [Section 4.2] The tidal radius used in Eq. (3) is not independent of the photometric mass being compared. The text states that rt=6.3 pc was calculated from the total photometric mass of 82 Msun, but the resulting dynamical mass of ~5581 Msun would imply a tidal radius larger by roughly a factor of (5581/82)^(1/3) ~ 4 if computed self-consistently. As written, the calculation compares a dynamical mass derived from an input radius that already encodes the photometric mass. The coupled equations should be solved simultaneously, or at minimum the comparison should be flagged as an order-of-magnitude indicator. Additionally, the photometric mass is quoted as 82 Msun in Section 4.2 but ~164 Msun in Section 5; the manuscript should state which value is being compared and why.
  3. [Section 4.4, Table 2] The classification of 12 variables as RR Lyrae stars is not supported by the data presented. RR Lyrae stars are evolved, metal-poor Population II pulsators with typical amplitudes of several tenths of a magnitude, whereas the stars in Table 2 marked 'RR Lyrae' have amplitudes of 8-90 mmag, and several (e.g., V18, V19, V32, V33) are flagged as members of a 160 Myr old open cluster, which cannot plausibly contain RR Lyrae stars. The stated criterion that RR Lyrae have 'the same spectral type as delta Scuti but larger periods' is not a physically valid basis for classification. These objects should instead be classified as delta Scuti, gamma Dor, or other main-sequence pulsators, or be discussed as ambiguous.
  4. [Appendix 1.1 and Section 3.2] The membership determination assumes a distance of 2.27 kpc from WEBDA when computing the expected proper-motion dispersion, and the same members are then used in Section 3.2 to derive the cluster distance of 2.0 +/- 0.1 kpc. Because the PM dispersion scales as 1/distance, the assumed distance enters the membership selection and can bias the parallax-based distance estimate. The manuscript should quantify the sensitivity of the membership list and the resulting distance to the assumed distance, or derive the membership model iteratively with the distance.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Section 3.3] The luminosity-function bins are converted to masses using a 160 Myr isochrone from Pecaut and Mamajek (2013), whereas Section 3.2 and Figure 2 use Pastorelli et al. (2019) for the same age; please make the reference consistent.
  2. [Section 4.4] The text first says 26 periodic variables are classified as BY Dra variables and then says 'The period and amplitude of these 28 variables range...'; the count should be corrected.
  3. [Abstract and Section 4.1] The phrase 'clear turn-off point at ~1.7 M_sun in the mass function' is misleading; this is a break in the mass-function slope, not a turn-off point.
  4. [Table 1] Exposure entries such as '10,300; 60; 10,300' are ambiguous; please present the two exposure times as separate columns or with explicit labels.
  5. [Table 2] The entry for V26 is labeled 'Periodic/Field' in the table, but the text says the star could not be classified because distance information is missing; the label should be 'Periodic/unclassified'.
  6. [Section 4.2] Gamma_MSR = 1.1 +/- 1.2 is consistent with no mass segregation; the claim 'indicates the presence of mass segregation' should be softened or supported by a significance test.
  7. [References] Girard et al. (1989a) and (1989b) are the same paper and should be merged.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main results are measured quantities and the disruption inference is assumption-driven but not definitionally forced.

full rationale

The paper's principal quantities—distance, age, mass function, and variable-star classifications—are derived from independent photometric, astrometric, and light-curve data, not from the conclusions they support. The distance estimate rests on Gaia parallaxes of selected members and isochrone fitting; the age comes from fitting a 160 Myr isochrone to the CMD. The mass function is built from completeness-corrected luminosity functions converted with that same isochrone, which is a standard application rather than a circular insertion of the target result. The mild interdependence noted by the reader is real but not circular: the membership model in Appendix 1.1 assumes a WEBDA distance and a 1 km/s velocity dispersion to define the proper-motion acceptance circle, and the later distance estimate is not forced by that assumption because it is also checked by parallaxes and isochrones. The strongest candidate for a circularity concern is the dynamical-mass comparison in Section 4.2, where the tidal radius rt is first computed from a photometric mass of 82 M_sun and then used in Eq. 3 to obtain a dynamical mass of about 5581 M_sun. However, this is not a reduction of the conclusion to its inputs: the dynamical mass is not equal to the photometric mass by construction, and the deficit depends on the externally assumed 1 km/s radial velocity dispersion from Girard et al. 1989. A different adopted dispersion would change the magnitude of the claimed deficit, showing that the result is assumption-sensitive rather than tautological. The self-citations to Sharma et al. 2020 and Kaur et al. 2020 are methodological references for data reduction, membership, and tidal-radius procedures; they are not invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as unverified proof of the Be 65 disruption claim. Therefore no circular step meets the evidentiary standard of the analysis.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All core quantities rest on standard photometric and astrometric methods plus the assumptions listed. The largest unverified input is the velocity dispersion used for the dynamical mass, followed by the isochrone age and the ad hoc RR Lyrae classification rule.

free parameters (5)
  • E(B-V)_min = 0.92 mag
    Minimum reddening toward Be65, obtained by shifting the ZAMS along the reddening vector to match the bluest A- and B-type members in the TCD (Section 3.2). Used for distance, isochrone placement, and HR diagram.
  • Cluster age = 160 Myr
    Selected by eye from fitting a 160 Myr, Z=0.02 isochrone (Pastorelli et al. 2019) to the V vs V-I CMD (Section 3.2). Uncertainty is adopted as 40 Myr rather than derived.
  • 1D velocity dispersion sigma_1D = 1 km/s
    Assumed typical open cluster value (Girard et al. 1989) used in Eq. 3 to compute dynamical mass; no measured radial velocity dispersion for Be65 exists in the paper.
  • MF break mass = ~1.7 solar masses
    Change in MF slope chosen by visual inspection of Figure 4 and used to argue low-mass stars have escaped.
  • PM selection radius = 0.3 mas/yr
    Radius in the Gaia DR3 proper-motion plane used to define probable members in Appendix 1.1.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Reddening law R_V=3.1 and E(U-B)/E(B-V)=0.72 apply along the Be65 line of sight.
    Section 3.2 uses this standard extinction law to shift the ZAMS; if the law differs, E(B-V) and distance change.
  • domain assumption The cluster is a single, coeval population with solar metallicity Z=0.02.
    Isochrone fitting in Section 3.2 assumes one age and metallicity; age spread or metallicity variation would shift the CMD fit.
  • domain assumption The 1 km/s radial velocity dispersion is typical for Be65.
    Section 4.2 Eq. 3; no measured dispersion is presented.
  • domain assumption Minimum reddening equals foreground reddening with negligible differential extinction.
    Sections 3.2 and 4.1 state that scatter in the TCD hints at negligible differential reddening, but this is inferred from the same data used for the reddening estimate.
  • domain assumption The WEBDA distance of 2.27 kpc used to construct the PM membership model is approximately correct.
    Appendix 1.1 uses this distance to estimate expected PM dispersion; the paper later derives 2.0 kpc from parallaxes of the resulting members.
  • ad hoc to paper Longer-period delta Scuti candidates can be classified as RR Lyrae because both have A-F spectral types.
    Section 4.4 uses this to classify 12 stars as RR Lyrae; it ignores luminosity class differences and is implausible for four claimed members of a 160 Myr cluster.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Long-term investigation of an open cluster Berkeley 65." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5BRUMM7K

@misc{pith2026250524240,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Long-term investigation of an open cluster Berkeley 65},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5BRUMM7K}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.24240}
}
abstract

We present a decade-long investigation of a poorly studied cluster, Berkeley 65 (Be 65), using deep optical data from the telescopes of ARIES, Nainital Observatory. We estimate its radius ($R_{cluster}$ = 1.6$^{'}$, aspect ratio of $\sim$1.1), distance (2.0 $\pm$ 0.1 kpc) and age ($\sim$160 Myrs). A clear turn-off point at $\sim$1.7 M$_\odot$ in the mass function suggests the escape of low-mass stars, and the lower photometric mass compared to the dynamical mass indicates ongoing disruption due to external forces. Our long-baseline optical photometric data also identifies 64 periodic and 16 non-periodic stars in this region. We have presented the light curves and the classification of those variables. The periodic stars have periods ranging from $\sim$0.05 days to $\sim$3.00 days and amplitude ranges from $\sim$8 mmag to $\sim$700 mmag. The nonperiodic stars show variation from $\sim$30 mmag to $\sim$500 mmag. The periodic stars include main-sequence pulsating variables such as Slow Pulsating B-type, $\delta$ Scuti, RR Lyrae, and $\gamma$ Doradus. We report a detached binary system and rotating variables similar to BY Draconis-type stars exhibiting variable brightness caused by starspots, chromospheric activity, and magnetic field-related phenomena.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.24240 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left panel: Color composite image of the Be 65 cluster region covering ∼20 ′ × 20 ′ FoV, using the W2 (4.6 µm), W3 (12 µm), and W4 (22 µm) WISE images, shown as blue, green, and red colors, respectively. The red contours are the stellar iso-density contours generated using the nearest neighbor method from the 2MASS data (see Section 4.1). The cyan color convex hull indicates the extent of the Be 65 cluster. The gree… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left panel: U − B V/s B − V TCD for Be 65. The cluster member stars inside the convex hull are represented as black dots. The dashed blue line is the theoretical ZAMS curve taken from Pecaut and Mamajek (2013). The solid blue line is the reddened ZAMS curve along the reddening vector (black arrow) with E(B − V ) = 0.92 mag. Right panel: V vs. (V − I) CMD for Be 65. The solid blue curve represents the theoretical iso… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left panel: V vs. (V − I) CMD for the stars in cluster and field regions. The blue line envelopes are created to select well-defined MS stars for LF and MF calculation for Be 65. Right panel: Completeness factor for the cluster region of Be 65 as a function of magnitude. The red and blue dots are completeness factors derived using photometric I and V band data, respectively. The dashed lines are respective smoothed … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Mass function distribution for the Be 65 cluster. The error bars represented with MF data points (filled black dots) are ± √ N errors. The solid cyan and magenta lines are the least-squares fits to the MF data points. Frontiers 23 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p02…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Samples of the light curves: in the upper panel, the light curve of a non-periodic variable (V15) is shown. The light curve of a periodic variable (V42) is shown in the lower panel. Frontiers 24 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Upper panel: The power spectrum of a periodic star (V42) derived using Lomb-Scargle periodogram (Lomb, 1976; Scargle, 1982). Middle panel: the phase-folded light curve of the same periodic star (V42) using the period as 0.089 days. Lower panel: The phase-folded light c…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: RMS dispersion of magnitudes for all the target stars as a function of their V magnitude. The grey dots represent the stars in FoV towards the Be 65 cluster, while the blue open triangles and stars represent non-periodic and periodic variables towards the Be 65 cluster…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: In the left panel, the histogram shows the amplitude distribution of variable stars. The right panel shows the period distribution of periodic stars. Frontiers 26 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Hertzsprung-Russell (log(L/L⊙) vs. log(Teff )) diagram for periodic variables within the FoV. The dotted blue line is the MS curve from Pecaut and Mamajek (2013). The green dots and red open circles represent the field and member periodic variables, respectively. The d…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    T., Gutermuth , R., Myers , P

    Allen , L., Megeath , S. T., Gutermuth , R., Myers , P. C., Wolk , S., Adams , F. C., et al. (2007). The Structure and Evolution of Young Stellar Clusters . In Protostars and Planets V, eds. B. Reipurth , D. Jewitt , and K. Keil . 361. doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0603096 Allen_2007prpl.conf..361A

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0603096 2007

  2. [2]

    J., Goodwin , S

    Allison , R. J., Goodwin , S. P., Parker , R. J., Portegies Zwart , S. F., de Grijs , R., and Kouwenhoven , M. B. N. (2009). Using the minimum spanning tree to trace mass segregation . 395, 1449--1454. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14508.x Allison_2009MNRAS.395.1449A

    arXiv 2009

  3. [3]

    Bailer-Jones , C. A. L., Rybizki , J., Fouesneau , M., Demleitner , M., and Andrae , R. (2021). Estimating Distances from Parallaxes. V. Geometric and Photogeometric Distances to 1.47 Billion Stars in Gaia Early Data Release 3 . 161, 147. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd806 Bailer-Jones_2021AJ....161..147B

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd806 2021

  4. [5]

    Battinelli , P. (1991). A new identification technique for OB associations : OB associations in the Small Magellanic Cloud. 244, 69 Battinelli_1991A&A...244...69B

    1991

  5. [6]

    and Tremaine , S

    Binney , J. and Tremaine , S. (1987). Galactic dynamics Binney_1987gady.book.....B

    1987

  6. [7]

    O., Bica , E., and Santiago , B

    Bonatto , C., Kerber , L. O., Bica , E., and Santiago , B. X. (2006). Probing disk properties with open clusters . 446, 121--135. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053573 2006A&A...446..121B

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053573 2006

  7. [8]

    Brinkmann , N., Banerjee , S., Motwani , B., and Kroupa , P. (2017). The bound fraction of young star clusters . 600, A49. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629312 2017A&A...600A..49B

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629312 2017

  8. [9]

    Chahal , D., de Grijs , R., Kamath , D., and Chen , X. (2022). Statistics of BY Draconis chromospheric variable stars . 514, 4932--4943. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1660 Chahal_2022MNRAS.514.4932C

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1660 2022

Show all 85 references
  1. [10]

    L., Muench , A., and Fazio , G

    Chavarr \' a , L., Allen , L., Brunt , C., Hora , J. L., Muench , A., and Fazio , G. (2014). A multiwavelength study of embedded clusters in W5-east, NGC 7538, S235, S252 and S254-S258 . 439, 3719--3754. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu224 Chavarr_2014MNRAS.439.3719C

    2014 doi

  2. [11]

    Chehlaeh, N., Mkrtichian, D., Lampens, P., Komonjinda, S., Kim, S.-L., Van Cauteren, P., et al. (2018). Photometric study and search for variable stars in the intermediate-age open cluster NGC 2126 . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 480, 1850--1863. doi:10.109...

    2018 doi

  3. [12]

    M., Skrutskie , M

    Cutri , R. M., Skrutskie , M. F., van Dyk , S., Beichman , C. A., Carpenter , J. M., Chester , T., et al. (2003). VizieR Online Data Catalog: 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources (Cutri+ 2003) . VizieR Online Data Catalog , II/246 2003yCat.2246....0C

    2003

  4. [13]

    Dib , S., Gutkin , J., Brandner , W., and Basu , S. (2013). Feedback-regulated star formation - II. Dual constraints on the SFE and the age spread of stars in massive clusters . 436, 3727--3740. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1857 2013MNRAS.436.3727D

    2013 doi

  5. [14]

    Dib , S., Piau , L., Mohanty , S., and Braine , J. (2011). Star formation efficiency as a function of metallicity: from star clusters to galaxies . 415, 3439--3454. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18966.x 2011MNRAS.415.3439D

    2011

  6. [16]

    Dib , S., Schmeja , S., and Parker , R. J. (2018 b ). Structure and mass segregation in Galactic stellar clusters . 473, 849--859. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2413 Dib_2018MNRAS.473..849D

    2018 doi

  7. [17]

    Fedurco , M., Paunzen , E., H \"u mmerich , S., Bernhard , K., and Parimucha , S . (2020). Pulsational properties of ten new slowly pulsating B stars . 633, A122. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935478 Fedurco_2020A&A...633A.122F

    2020 doi

  8. [18]

    J., Boily , C

    Fleck , J. J., Boily , C. M., Lan c on , A., and Deiters , S. (2006). On the mass of dense star clusters in starburst galaxies from spectrophotometry . 369, 1392--1406. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10390.x 2006MNRAS.369.1392F

    2006

  9. [19]

    VizieR Online Data Catalog: Gaia DR3 Part 4

    Gaia Collaboration (2022). VizieR Online Data Catalog: Gaia DR3 Part 4. Variability (Gaia Collaboration, 2022) . VizieR Online Data Catalog , I/358 Gaia_2022yCat.1358....0G

    2022

  10. [20]

    , Brown, A

    Gaia Collaboration , Vallenari, A. , Brown, A. G. A. , Prusti, T. , de Bruijne, J. H. J. , Arenou, F. , et al. (2023). Gaia data release 3 - summary of the content and survey properties. A&A 674, A1. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 refId0

    2023 doi

  11. [21]

    Gao , X., Chen , X., Wang , S., and Liu , J. (2025). Classification of Periodic Variable Stars from TESS . 276, 57. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad9dd6 Gao_2025ApJS..276...57G

    2025 doi

  12. [22]

    and Saio , H

    Gautschy , A. and Saio , H. (1993). On non-radial oscillations of B-type stars. 262, 213--219. doi:10.1093/mnras/262.1.213 Gautschy_1993

    1993 doi

  13. [24]

    M., Grundy , W

    Girard , T. M., Grundy , W. M., Lopez , C. E., and van Altena , W. F. (1989 b ). Relative Proper Motions and the Stellar Velocity Dispersion of the Open Cluster M67 . 98, 227. doi:10.1086/115139 Girard_1989AJ

    1989 doi

  14. [25]

    E., Donovan Meyer , J., Kennicutt , R

    Grasha , K., Calzetti , D., Bittle , L., Johnson , K. E., Donovan Meyer , J., Kennicutt , R. C., et al. (2018). Connecting young star clusters to CO molecular gas in NGC 7793 with ALMA-LEGUS . 481, 1016--1027. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2154 Grasha_2018MNRAS.481.1016G

    2018 doi

  15. [26]

    G., Calzetti , D., Adamo , A., Aloisi , A., Bright , S

    Grasha , K., Elmegreen , B. G., Calzetti , D., Adamo , A., Aloisi , A., Bright , S. N., et al. (2017). Hierarchical Star Formation in Turbulent Media: Evidence from Young Star Clusters . 842, 25. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa740b Grasha_2017ApJ...842...25G

    2017 doi

  16. [27]

    M., Schlafly , E., Zucker , C., Speagle , J

    Green , G. M., Schlafly , E., Zucker , C., Speagle , J. S., and Finkbeiner , D. (2019). A 3D Dust Map Based on Gaia, Pan-STARRS 1, and 2MASS . 887, 93. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab5362 Green_2019ApJ...887...93G

    2019 doi

  17. [28]

    A., Megeath , S

    Gutermuth , R. A., Megeath , S. T., Myers , P. C., Allen , L. E., Pipher , J. L., and Fazio , G. G. (2009). A Spitzer Survey of Young Stellar Clusters Within One Kiloparsec of the Sun: Cluster Core Extraction and Basic Structural Analysis . 184, 18--83. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/1...

    2009 doi

  18. [29]

    A., Megeath , S

    Gutermuth , R. A., Megeath , S. T., Pipher , J. L., Williams , J. P., Allen , L. E., Myers , P. C., et al. (2005). The Initial Configuration of Young Stellar Clusters: A K-Band Number Counts Analysis of the Surface Density of Stars . 632, 397--420. doi:10.1086/432460 2005ApJ.....

    2005 doi

  19. [30]

    New cephei stars in the young open cluster ngc 637 ^

    Handler and Meingast (2011). New cephei stars in the young open cluster ngc 637 ^ . A&A 533, A70. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116874 Handler_2011

    2011 doi

  20. [31]

    Ibanoglu , C., C ak rl , \"O ., and Sipahi , E. (2018). The first comprehensive catalog of Dor pulsators and their characteristics . 62, 70--84. doi:10.1016/j.newast.2018.01.004 2018NewA...62...70I

    2018 doi

  21. [33]

    B., Kim , S

    Kang , Y. B., Kim , S. L., Rey , S. C., Lee , C. U., Kim , Y. H., Koo , J. R., et al. (2007). Variable Stars in the Open Cluster NGC 2099 (M37) . 119, 239--250. doi:10.1086/513883 Kang_2007

    2007 doi

  22. [34]

    K., Ojha , D

    Kaur , H., Sharma , S., Dewangan , L. K., Ojha , D. K., Durgapal , A., and Panwar , N. (2020). Unveiling the Physical Conditions in NGC 6910 . 896, 29. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9122 Kaur_2020ApJ...896...29K

    2020 doi

  23. [35]

    K., Verma , A., Panwar , N., et al

    Kaur , H., Sharma , S., Durgapal , A., Dewangan , L. K., Verma , A., Panwar , N., et al. (2023). Structural analysis of open cluster Bochum 2 . Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy 44, 66. doi:10.1007/s12036-023-09953-9 Kaur_2023JApA...44...66K

    2023 doi

  24. [36]

    L., Chun , M

    Kim , S. L., Chun , M. Y., Park , B. G., Lee , S. H., Sung , H., Ann , H. B., et al. (2001). Search for short-period variable stars in the open cluster NGC 2301 . 371, 571--578. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010403 Kim_2001

    2001 doi

  25. [37]

    Koenig , X. P. and Leisawitz , D. T. (2014). A Classification Scheme for Young Stellar Objects Using the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer AllWISE Catalog: Revealing Low-density Star Formation in the Outer Galaxy . 791, 131. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/791/2/131 Koenig_2014ApJ...791..131K

    2014 doi

  26. [38]

    Kroupa , P. (2002). The Initial Mass Function of Stars: Evidence for Uniformity in Variable Systems . Science 295, 82--91. doi:10.1126/science.1067524 Kroupa_2002Sci...295...82K

    2002 doi

  27. [40]

    Lada, C. J. and Lada, E. A. (2003). Embedded clusters in molecular clouds. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 41, 57--115. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094844 Lada_2003

    2003 arXiv

  28. [41]

    Landolt , A. U. (1992). UBVRI Photometric Standard Stars in the Magnitude Range 11.5 < V < 16.0 Around the Celestial Equator . 104, 340. doi:10.1086/116242 Landolt_1992AJ....104..340L

    1992 doi

  29. [42]

    Lata, S., Pandey, A., Sharma, S., Bonatto, C., and Yadav, R. K. (2014). Photometric study of five open star clusters. New Astronomy 26, 77--85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newast.2013.06.003 LATA_2014

    2014 doi

  30. [43]

    K., Kesh Yadav , R., Richichi , A., Irawati , P., Panwar , N., et al

    Lata , S., Pandey , A. K., Kesh Yadav , R., Richichi , A., Irawati , P., Panwar , N., et al. (2019). Short-period Variable Stars in Young Open Cluster Stock 8 . 158, 68. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab298c Lata_2019AJ....158...68L

    2019 doi

  31. [44]

    K., Pandey , A

    Lata , S., Yadav , R. K., Pandey , A. K., Richichi , A., Eswaraiah , C., Kumar , B., et al. (2014). Main-sequence variable stars in young open cluster NGC 1893 . 442, 273--284. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu726 Lata_2014MNRAS.442..273L

    2014 doi

  32. [45]

    Lebzelter , T., Mowlavi , N., Lecoeur-Taibi , I., Trabucchi , M., Audard , M., Garc \' a-Lario , P., et al. (2023). Gaia Data Release 3. The second Gaia catalogue of long-period variable candidates . 674, A15. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244241 Lebzelter_2023A&A...674A..15L

    2023 doi

  33. [46]

    Lomb , N. R. (1976). Least-Squares Frequency Analysis of Unequally Spaced Data . 39, 447--462. doi:10.1007/BF00648343 Lomb_1976Ap&SS..39..447L

    1976 doi

  34. [47]

    E., Salinas , R., Vivas , A

    Martinez-Vazquez , C. E., Salinas , R., Vivas , A. K., and Catelan , M. (2023). ``Breaking the laws'': A segmented period-luminosity relation in delta Scuti stars . In American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts. vol. 241 of American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts,...

    2023

  35. [48]

    Mathieu , R. D. (1984). The structure and dynamics of the open cluster M 11. 284, 643--662. doi:10.1086/162447 Mathieu_1984ApJ...284..643M

    1984 doi

  36. [49]

    , Parihar, P

    Messina, , Distefano, E. , Parihar, P. , Kang, Y. B. , Kim, S.-L. , Rey, S.-C. , et al. (2008). Race-oc project: rotation and variability in the open cluster ngc 2099 (m 37). A&A 483, 253--262. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20079216 Messina_2008

    2008 doi

  37. [50]

    Miglio , A., Montalb \'a n , J., and Dupret , M. A. (2007). Revised instability domains of SPB and Cephei stars . Communications in Asteroseismology 151, 48--56. doi:10.1553/cia151s48 Miglio_2007CoAst.151...48M

    2007 doi

  38. [51]

    Mowlavi , N., Barblan , F., Saesen , S., and Eyer , L. (2013). Stellar variability in open clusters. I. A new class of variable stars in NGC 3766 . 554, A108. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321065 Mowlavi_2013A&A...554A.108M

    2013 doi

  39. [52]

    P., Marengo , M., Mart \' nez-V \'a zquez , C

    Mullen , J. P., Marengo , M., Mart \' nez-V \'a zquez , C. E., Chaboyer , B., Bono , G., Braga , V. F., et al. (2023). RR Lyrae Mid-infrared Period-Luminosity-Metallicity and Period-Wesenheit-Metallicity Relations Based on Gaia DR3 Parallaxes . 945, 83. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/a...

    2023 doi

  40. [53]

    Olczak , C., Spurzem , R., and Henning , T. (2011). A highly efficient measure of mass segregation in star clusters . 532, A119. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116902 Olczak_2011A&A...532A.119O

    2011 doi

  41. [54]

    K., Ojha , D

    Pandey , R., Sharma , S., Panwar , N., Dewangan , L. K., Ojha , D. K., Bisen , D. P., et al. (2020). Stellar Cores in the Sh 2-305 H II Region . 891, 81. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab6dc7 Pandey_2020ApJ...891...81P

    2020 doi

  42. [55]

    Parker , R. J. and Dale , J. E. (2013). Imprints of feedback in young gasless clusters? 432, 986--997. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt517 2013MNRAS.432..986P

    2013 doi

  43. [56]

    Parker , R. J. and Meyer , M. R. (2012). Characterizing the dynamical state of star clusters from snapshots of their spatial distributions . 427, 637--650. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21851.x 2012MNRAS.427..637P

    2012

  44. [57]

    Pastorelli , G., Marigo , P., Girardi , L., Chen , Y., Rubele , S., Trabucchi , M., et al. (2019). Constraining the thermally pulsing asymptotic giant branch phase with resolved stellar populations in the Small Magellanic Cloud . 485, 5666--5692. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz725 Pasto...

    2019 doi

  45. [58]

    Pecaut , M. J. and Mamajek , E. E. (2013). Intrinsic Colors, Temperatures, and Bolometric Corrections of Pre-main-sequence Stars . 208, 9. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/9 Pecaut_2013ApJS..208....9P

    2013 doi

  46. [59]

    and Kaczmarek , T

    Pfalzner , S. and Kaczmarek , T. (2013). The expansion of massive young star clusters - observation meets theory . 559, A38. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322134 2013A&A...559A..38P

    2013 doi

  47. [60]

    Phelps , R. L. and Janes , K. A. (1994). Young Open Clusters as Probes of the Star Formation Process. I. an Atlas of Open Cluster Photometry . 90, 31. doi:10.1086/191857 1994ApJS...90...31P

    1994 doi

  48. [61]

    K., et al

    Pietrukowicz , P., Soszy \'n ski , I., Netzel , H., Wrona , M., Udalski , A., Szyma \'n ski , M. K., et al. (2020). Over 10000 Scuti Stars toward the Galactic Bulge from OGLE-IV . 70, 241--263. doi:10.32023/0001-5237/70.4.1 Pietrukowicz_2020AcA....70..241P

    2020 doi

  49. [62]

    Rangwal, G., Yadav, R. K. S., Bisht, D., Durgapal, A., and Sariya, D. P. (2023). Investigating kinematics and dynamics of three open clusters towards Galactic anticentre . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 523, 1867--1884. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1517 Rangwal_2023

    2023 doi

  50. [63]

    Ren , F., de Grijs , R., Zhang , H., Deng , L., Chen , X., Matsunaga , N., et al. (2021). VizieR Online Data Catalog: KISOGP: 7055 eclipsing binaries with KWFC (Ren+, 2021) . VizieR Online Data Catalog , J/AJ/161/176doi:10.26093/cds/vizier.51610176 Ren_2021yCat..51610176R

    2021 doi

  51. [64]

    Ruprecht , J. (1966). Classification of open star clusters . Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of Czechoslovakia 17, 33 1966BAICz..17...33R

    1966

  52. [65]

    Sagar , R., Kumar , B., Omar , A., and Joshi , Y. C. (2012). New optical telescopes at Devasthal observatory : 1.3-m installed and 3.6-m upcoming . In Astronomical Society of India Conference Series. vol. 4 of Astronomical Society of India Conference Series, 173 Sagar_2012ASIn...

    2012

  53. [66]

    and Richtler , T

    Sagar , R. and Richtler , T. (1991). Mass functions of five Large Magellanic Cloud star clusters. 250, 324 Sagar_1991A&A...250..324S

    1991

  54. [67]

    P., C \'o rsico , A

    S \'a nchez Arias , J. P., C \'o rsico , A. H., and Althaus , L. G. (2017). Asteroseismology of hybrid Scuti- Doradus pulsating stars . 597, A29. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629126 2017A&A...597A..29S

    2017 doi

  55. [68]

    Scargle , J. D. (1982). Studies in astronomical time series analysis. II. Statistical aspects of spectral analysis of unevenly spaced data. 263, 835--853. doi:10.1086/160554 Scargle_1982ApJ...263..835S

    1982 doi

  56. [69]

    and Klessen , R

    Schmeja , S. and Klessen , R. S. (2006). Evolving structures of star-forming clusters . 449, 151--159. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054464 2006A&A...449..151S

    2006 doi

  57. [70]

    K., Yadav , R., et al

    Sharma , S., Dewangan , L., Panwar , N., Kaur , H., Ojha , D. K., Yadav , R., et al. (2023). Teutsch 76: A deep near-infrared study . Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy 44, 46. doi:10.1007/s12036-023-09936-w Sharma_2023JApA...44...46S

    2023 doi

  58. [71]

    K., Pandey , R., Sinha , T., Pandey , A

    Sharma , S., Ghosh , A., Ojha , D. K., Pandey , R., Sinha , T., Pandey , A. K., et al. (2020). The disintegrating old open cluster Czernik 3 . 498, 2309--2322. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2412 Sharma_2020MNRAS.498.2309S

    2020 doi

  59. [72]

    K., Borissova, J., Ojha, D

    Sharma, S., Pandey, A. K., Borissova, J., Ojha, D. K., Ivanov, V. D., Ogura, K., et al. (2016). Structural studies of eight bright rimmed clouds in the southern hemisphere. The Astronomical Journal 151, 126. doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/5/126 Sharma_2016

    2016 doi

  60. [73]

    K., Ogura, K., Aoki, T., Pandey, K., Sandhu, T

    Sharma, S., Pandey, A. K., Ogura, K., Aoki, T., Pandey, K., Sandhu, T. S., et al. (2008). Mass functions and photometric binaries in nine open clusters. The Astronomical Journal 135, 1934. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/135/5/1934 Sharma_2008

    2008 doi

  61. [74]

    K., Ojha, D

    Sharma, S., Pandey, A. K., Ojha, D. K., Chen, W. P., Ghosh, S. K., Bhatt, B. C., et al. (2007). Star formation in young star cluster NGC 1893 . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 380, 1141--1160. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12156.x Sharma_200710.1111/j.1365-296...

    2007

  62. [75]

    K., Kaur , H., Yadav , R

    Sharma , S., Verma , A., Mallick , K., Dewangan , L. K., Kaur , H., Yadav , R. K., et al. (2024). Cluster Formation in a Filamentary Cloud: The Case of the Stellar Cluster NGC 2316 . 167, 106. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad19cd Sharma_2024AJ....167..106S

    2024 doi

  63. [76]

    Shu , F. H. (1982). The Physical Universe Shu_1982phyn.book.....S

    1982

  64. [77]

    F., Cutri , R

    Skrutskie , M. F., Cutri , R. M., Stiening , R., Weinberg , M. D., Schneider , S., Carpenter , J. M., et al. (2006). The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) . 131, 1163--1183. doi:10.1086/498708 2006AJ....131.1163S

    2006 doi

  65. [78]

    K., Skowron , D

    Soszy \'n ski , I., Pietrukowicz , P., Skowron , J., Udalski , A., Szyma \'n ski , M. K., Skowron , D. M., et al. (2021). Over 24 000 Scuti Stars in the Galactic Bulge and Disk from the OGLE Survey . 71, 189--204. doi:10.32023/0001-5237/71.3.1 Soszy_2021AcA....71..189S

    2021 doi

  66. [79]

    and Harm , R

    Spitzer , L., Jr. and Harm , R. (1958). Evaporation of Stars from Isolated Clusters. 127, 544. doi:10.1086/146486 1958ApJ...127..544S

    1958 doi

  67. [80]

    and Handler , G

    Stankov , A. and Handler , G. (2005). Catalog of Galactic Cephei Stars . 158, 193--216. doi:10.1086/429408 Stankov_2005ApJS..158..193S

    2005 doi

  68. [81]

    Stetson , P. B. (1987). DAOPHOT: A Computer Program for Crowded-Field Stellar Photometry . 99, 191. doi:10.1086/131977 Stetson_1987PASP...99..191S

    1987 doi

  69. [82]

    Stetson , P. B. (1992). More Experiments with DAOPHOT II and WF/PC Images . In Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems I, eds. D. M. Worrall , C. Biemesderfer , and J. Barnes . vol. 25 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 297 Stetson_1992ASPC...25..297S

    1992

  70. [83]

    and Daszy \'n ska-Daszkiewicz , J

    Szewczuk , W. and Daszy \'n ska-Daszkiewicz , J. (2017). Domains of pulsational instability of low-frequency modes in rotating upper main sequence stars . 469, 13--46. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx738 Szewczuk_2017MNRAS.469...13S

    2017 doi

  71. [84]

    P., Hong , J., Goldman , B., et al

    Tang , S.-Y., Pang , X., Yuan , Z., Chen , W. P., Hong , J., Goldman , B., et al. (2019). Discovery of Tidal Tails in Disrupting Open Clusters: Coma Berenices and a Neighbor Stellar Group . 877, 12. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab13b0 2019ApJ...877...12T

    2019 doi

  72. [85]

    K., et al

    Verma, A., Sharma, S., Dewangan, L., Pandey, R., Baug, T., Ojha, D. K., et al. (2023). Kronberger 55: A candidate for end-dominated collapse scenario. Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy 44. doi:10.1007/s12036-023-09932-0 Verma_2023

    2023 doi

  73. [86]

    Waelkens , C. (1991). Slowly pulsating B stars. 246, 453 Waelkens_1991A&A...246..453W

    1991

  74. [87]

    B., Kaye , A

    Warner , P. B., Kaye , A. B., and Guzik , J. A. (2003). A Theoretical Doradus Instability Strip . 593, 1049--1055. doi:10.1086/376727 Warner_2003ApJ...593.1049W

    2003 doi

  75. [88]

    P., Sarrazine , A

    Yang , S.-C., Sarajedini , A., Deliyannis , C. P., Sarrazine , A. R., Kim , S. C., and Kyeong , J. (2013). WIYN Open Cluster Study LII: Wide-field CCD Photometry of the Old Open Cluster NGC 6819 . 762, 3. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/762/1/3 2013ApJ...762....3Y

    2013 doi

  76. [89]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address annote author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eid howpublished institution journal key language month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.s...

  77. [90]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.