Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Cartan Isometries and Toeplitz Operators on Cartan domains

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A commuting tuple of operators is a Cartan isometry exactly when each component of the Jordan triple determinant evaluates to the binomial constant.

desk verdict Solid extension of Brown-Halmos to all classical Cartan domains with a unified Cartan-isometry criterion; main risk is the unproved import Proposition 3.3. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.24325 v1 pith:AME44CVF submitted 2025-05-30 math.FA

Surjit Kumar , Milan Kumar Mal , Paramita Pramanick This is my paper
classification math.FA MSC 47A1347B3247B3532M15
keywords CartandomainisometryJordantripledeterminantShilovboundaryToeplitzoperatorHardyspacesubnormaltuplereflexivity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes a single intrinsic test for Cartan isometries—commuting tuples of operators that are subnormal and whose minimal normal extension has Taylor spectrum contained in the Shilov boundary of a classical Cartan domain. The test says: plug the tuple into each component $\Delta^{(\ell)}$ of the Jordan triple determinant and require the result to be the constant operator $\binom{r}{\ell}$ times the identity. This folds the description of the Shilov boundary into one determinant identity and makes the class uniform across the classical Cartan domains, where earlier treatments worked domain by domain. On top of the characterization, the paper shows that Cartan isometries are preserved by biholomorphic automorphisms, and it gives a Brown-Halmos theorem: an operator on the Hardy space is a Toeplitz operator exactly when it satisfies the same radial equation.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the Jordan triple determinant $\Delta(z,w)$ of the bounded symmetric domain and its decomposition $\Delta(z,w)=\sum_{\ell=0}^r (-1)^\ell \Delta^{(\ell)}(z,w)$, with each $\Delta^{(\ell)}$ a sesqui-analytic polynomial homogeneous of bi-degree $(\ell,\ell)$. The load-bearing identity (Lemma 2.1) says that a point lies on the Shilov boundary exactly when $\Delta^{(\ell)}(z,z)=\binom{r}{\ell}$ for all $1\le \ell\le r$, mirroring the elementary symmetric polynomials evaluated at $(1,\dots,1)$. This identity converts a geometric condition on the spectrum of a normal extension into an algebraic operator equation via the hereditary functional calculus $p(z)q(w)(T,T^*)=q(T)^*p(T)$, which is what turns the determinant test into Theorem 2.4 and later into the radial equation of the Brown-Halmos theorem.

What would settle it

Take the Hardy space of a rank-2 classical Cartan domain and search for a bounded operator $A$ on $L^2(S_\Omega)$ satisfying $M_{z_1}^* A M_{z_1}+M_{z_2}^* A M_{z_2}=2A$ that does not commute with $M_{z_1}$; a single such $A$ would falsify the imported fixed-point lemma and, with it, the sufficiency half of Theorem 3.5.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 2.4: a commuting $d$-tuple $T$ of bounded operators on a Hilbert space is a Cartan isometry if and only if $\Delta^{(\ell)}(z,w)(T,T^*)=\binom{r}{\ell} I_H$ for every $1\le \ell\le r$, where the left-hand side is the hereditary functional calculus applied to the $\ell$-th homogeneous component of the Jordan triple determinant. The proof rests on Lemma 2.1, which identifies the Shilov boundary $S_\Omega$ as exactly the set of points $z$ with $\Delta^{(\ell)}(z,z)=\binom{r}{\ell}$ for all $\ell$. From that identity the paper derives that the Taylor spectrum of a Cartan isometry lies in the closed domain, that $\varphi(T)$ is again a Cartan isometry whenever $\varphi$ is a biholomorphic automorphism, and that an operator $X$ on the Hardy space $H^2(S_\Omega)$ is a Toeplitz operator precisely when $\sum_\alpha \psi_\alpha^{(\ell)}(T_z)^* X \psi_\alpha^{(\ell)}(T_z)=\binom{r}{\ell} X$ for every $\ell$. It then proves that the zero operator is the only compact Toeplitz operator, and studies $T$-Toeplitz operators and reflexivity of Cartan isometries.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is an imported fixed-point lemma: a bounded operator on the Shilov-boundary space that satisfies the radial averaging equation must commute with every coordinate multiplication, and this fact is used without proof.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • One characterization now covers every classical Cartan domain, so results that previously had to be proved separately for the unit ball and the other Cartan-type domains flow from a single determinant condition.
  • If $T$ is a Cartan isometry, then $\varphi(T)$ is a Cartan isometry for every biholomorphic automorphism $\varphi$ of the domain, so the class is invariant under the automorphism group.
  • An operator $X$ on the Hardy space is a Toeplitz operator exactly when it satisfies the radial equation in Theorem 3.5; in particular, the case $\ell=1$ alone already forces $X$ to be Toeplitz.
  • The only compact Toeplitz operator on the Hardy space $H^2(S_\Omega)$ is the zero operator.
  • Every Cartan isometry is reflexive, and $T$-Toeplitz operators decompose into a continuous part and the full operator algebras on the point-spectral eigenspaces.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The appendix gives the same elementary-symmetric-polynomial description for the other boundary components of type-I domains; a direct next step would be to define the corresponding boundary-component isometries and test whether the determinant equation still characterizes them.
  • The sufficiency half of Theorem 3.5 would be threatened if the imported fixed-point lemma failed for any Shilov-boundary measure, so a targeted search for a counterexample on a rank-2 domain would settle the robustness of the whole Brown-Halmos extension.
  • Replacing $\binom{r}{\ell}$ by the Pochhammer-based constants of the weighted Bergman spaces $H^{(\nu)}(\Omega)$ might produce a one-parameter family of isometry classes interpolating between Cartan isometries and the ordinary spherical ones, a possibility the present theorem does not explore.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies Cartan isometries on classical Cartan domains. It gives a Jordan-triple-determinant description of the Shilov boundary (Lemma 2.1), uses it to characterize Cartan isometries by the operator identities Δ^{(ℓ)}(T,T*)=binom(r,ℓ)I (Theorem 2.4), proves invariance under Aut(Ω) (Theorem 2.9), and establishes a Brown–Halmos type condition on the Hardy space H²(SΩ) (Theorem 3.5). It further shows that the only compact Toeplitz operator is the zero operator (Theorem 3.7), studies T-Toeplitz operators and reflexivity of Cartan isometries (Section 3.1), and treats dual Toeplitz operators (Section 3.2).

Significance. The main characterization theorem is attractive and genuinely intrinsic: it replaces the earlier case-by-case description with a single set of identities valid for all classical Cartan domains, and the proof is largely self-contained. The Brown–Halmos theorem for all classical domains and the compact-Toeplitz theorem are significant extensions of the sphere results. The paper also gives a clean proof of the Shilov-boundary description via the Jordan triple determinant. The main line of proof is credible and the results are stated with the standard operator-theoretic machinery of Taylor spectra, minimal normal extensions, and hereditary functional calculus. The secondary parts, however, contain two places where the written argument is incomplete and needs to be repaired or justified before publication.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theorem 2.10] The final step of the proof is not justified. After invoking [24, Theorem 2.3], one has T ≅ M_z on H(K) with K(z,w) = ∑_s a_s K_s(z,w) and a_0 = 1. The fact that the scalar spectral measure is K-invariant and supported on SΩ determines the measure dz, but it does not, by itself, identify the coefficient sequence (a_s) with the Hardy-space coefficients (d/r)_s. To conclude that M_z is the Szegő shift one must either compare the moments ∫ z^α \bar z^β dz with ⟨M_z^β 1, M_z^α 1⟩_{H(K)} and show that they force a_s = (d/r)_s, or use the Cartan-isometry equations of Theorem 2.4 directly. As written, the theorem is under-proved.
  2. [Proposition 3.15] The proof asserts without argument that P_λ = Ψ_N(χ_{λ}) commutes with the orthogonal projection P_H onto H. For a general subnormal tuple this is not automatic: spectral projections of the minimal normal extension need not leave H invariant. Since the subsequent decomposition T(T) ≅ T(T_c) ⊕ ⊕ B(H^λ_d) and Corollary 3.16 depend on P_λ|_H being an orthogonal projection on H, this point needs a proof (for instance, showing that every eigenspace of the minimal normal extension of a Cartan isometry is contained in H, or citing a reference) or the argument must be revised.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Proposition 3.3] The proof is omitted with the remark that the result follows by a suitable scaling from [13, Proposition 2.4]. The reduction is indeed immediate by setting S_i = N_i/√r and applying [13, Proposition 2.4] to S, since the statement is operator-theoretic and independent of the particular Shilov-boundary measure. Adding this one-line reduction would remove any doubt and make the paper more self-contained.
  2. [Lemma 3.20] The minimality of M_{\bar z} as the normal extension of S_{\bar z} is asserted via [3, Remark 3]; a brief explanation (for example, that a reducing subspace of M_{\bar z} containing H²⊥ would give a reducing subspace of M_z inside H² and contradict purity of T_z) would help the reader.
  3. [Corollary 3.6] The phrase 'careful observation of the proofs' is vague; the argument is clearer if one invokes Lemma 3.9 and the computation in Proposition 3.10, which proves the full set of ℓ-equations from the single ℓ=1 equation.
  4. [Abstract] The abstract says 'we obtained' where 'we obtain' is more appropriate; please proofread for small grammatical slips.
  5. [References] There are minor typos in several reference titles (for example, [13] should read 'Toeplitz operators in several complex variables'); please proofread the reference list.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation in the core results; the only self-citation is a minor side-result dependency, and the one omitted proof is an external algebraic rescaling, not a circular input.

full rationale

The central chain is not circular. Lemma 2.1 proves a scalar description of the Shilov boundary from the polar decomposition and the elementary-symmetric-polynomial expansion of the Jordan triple determinant. Theorem 2.4 then quantizes this description via the hereditary functional calculus and the spectral theorem, with Lemma 2.3 legitimately lifting identities from T to its minimal normal extension; the converse uses only the ℓ=1 relation plus Athavale's external subnormality criterion and Lemma 2.1 again. The forward direction is a spectral integral over σ(N) ⊆ S_Ω and is not definitional. Theorem 2.9 likewise computes the transformed identity directly and invokes Theorem 2.4. The Brown-Halmos necessity in Theorem 3.5 is a direct integral computation; the sufficiency uses Lemma 3.1 and Proposition 3.3. Proposition 3.3 is indeed imported without proof ('can be obtained by a suitable scaling in [13, Proposition 2.4]. Hence, we omit the proof'), which is an omitted proof to flag, but the scaling reduces to replacing N_i by N_i/√r in the algebraic fixed-point relation, so the step is not circular; at worst it is an unverified transfer of a known result. The only self-citation is Theorem 2.10, which relies on the authors' earlier classification [24] to put a K-homogeneous tuple in normal form; the classification has stated assumptions that do not include the theorem's conclusion, and the subsequent uniqueness of the K-invariant measure is an external, standard fact. This is a minor self-citation in a side result, not a load-bearing circular reduction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 10 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proofs depend on standard Jordan-theoretic structure of bounded symmetric domains (polar decomposition, Jordan frames, Faraut-Korányi formula), standard operator-theoretic theorems (Athavale's subnormality criterion, Davie-Jewell fixed-point theorem, maximality of L^∞), and Poisson-integral convergence results. No free parameters are fitted; all constants are structural invariants of the domain (r, a, b, d). The only new mathematical object, the T-Toeplitz operator, is a definition with derived properties, not a postulated entity.

assumptions (10)
  • domain assumption Jordan frame and polar decomposition for irreducible bounded symmetric domains; Shilov boundary is the K-orbit of a maximal tripotent; unique K-invariant measure on S_Ω.
    Used in Lemma 2.1 and Theorem 2.4; from [2], [23], [40].
  • domain assumption Faraut-Korányi expansion K^{(ν)} = Δ^{-ν} = Σ_s (ν)_s K_s, and the decomposition Δ^{(ℓ)} = ∏_{j=1}^ℓ (1 + a(j-1)/2) Σ_α ψ_α^{(ℓ)}(z) ψ_α^{(ℓ)}(w).
    Equations (1.2) and (2.3), used throughout Sections 2 and 3; from [23].
  • domain assumption Athavale criterion: a commuting tuple satisfying Σ_i T_i^* T_i = r I is subnormal.
    Converse direction of Theorem 2.4; from [4, Proposition 2].
  • domain assumption Fixed-point theorem: for a spherical normal tuple N, solutions A of Σ_i N_i^* A N_i = r A commute with all N_i and N_i^*.
    Proposition 3.3, used in Theorems 3.5 and 3.21; from [13, Proposition 2.4].
  • domain assumption Cayley transform maps Ω to a generalized half-plane; c^{-1}(Σ) is dense open in S_Ω; relation (3.8) between Poisson kernels.
    Used in Theorem 3.7; from [29], [30].
  • domain assumption Weiss admissible convergence: Poisson integral on generalized half-planes converges to boundary values a.e. admissibly.
    Used in Theorem 3.7; from [42, Theorem 2].
  • domain assumption Aleksandrov regularity of (A(Ω)|_{S_Ω}, S_Ω, μ) and validity of the weak* span identity for inner functions.
    Used in Proposition 3.13; from [1] and [17].
  • domain assumption Eschmeier's reflexivity theorem for regular A-isometries.
    Used in Proposition 3.18; from [22, Theorem 1].
  • domain assumption Ghara-Kumar-Pramanick classification of K-homogeneous tuples on bounded symmetric domains.
    Used in Theorem 2.10; from [24, Theorem 2.3].
  • standard math Polynomial mapping theorem for Taylor spectra and sequence characterization of joint approximate point spectrum.
    Used in Lemmas 2.6 and 2.7; see [26, page 187].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cartan Isometries and Toeplitz Operators on Cartan domains." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AME44CVF

@misc{pith2026250524325,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cartan Isometries and Toeplitz Operators on Cartan domains},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AME44CVF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.24325}
}
abstract

We provide a description of the Shilov boundary of the classical Cartan domain in terms of Jordan triple determinant. As a consequence, we obtained an intrinsic characterization of Cartan isometries. Further, we obtain (i) invariance of Cartan isometries under the action of the biholomorphic automorphism group, and (ii) a Brown-Halmos type condition for Toeplitz operators on the Cartan domain. Also, we show that the zero operator is the only compact Toeplitz operator. Finally, we study the $\boldsymbol T$-Toeplitz operators and reflexivity of a Cartan isometry $\boldsymbol T.$

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Brown-Halmos type characterization for the tetrablock

    math.FA 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Toeplitz operators on the tetrablock Hardy space are exactly the operators satisfying three algebraic relations with the coordinate multiplication tuple; the only compact Toeplitz operator is zero.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [24]

    Ghara, S

    S. Ghara, S. Kumar, and P. Pramanick,K-homogeneous tuple of operators on bounded symmetric domains, Israel J. Math.,247(2022), 331-360

    work page 2022

  2. [1]

    Aleksandrov,Inner functions on compact spaces, Funct

    A.B. Aleksandrov,Inner functions on compact spaces, Funct. Anal. Appl.,18(1984), 87-98

    work page 1984

  3. [2]

    Arazy,A survey of invariant Hilbert spaces of analytic functions on bounded symmetric domains, Contemporary Mathematics,185(1995), 7-65

    J. Arazy,A survey of invariant Hilbert spaces of analytic functions on bounded symmetric domains, Contemporary Mathematics,185(1995), 7-65

    work page 1995

  4. [3]

    Athavale,On the duals of subnormal tuples, Integral Equations Operator Theory,12(1989), 305-323

    A. Athavale,On the duals of subnormal tuples, Integral Equations Operator Theory,12(1989), 305-323

    work page 1989

  5. [4]

    Operator Theory,23(1990), 339-350

    ,On the intertwining of joining isometries, J. Operator Theory,23(1990), 339-350

    work page 1990

  6. [5]

    Math.,25(2019), 934–948

    ,A note on Cartan isometries, New York J. Math.,25(2019), 934–948

    work page 2019

  7. [6]

    Bercovici,A factorization theorem with applications to invariant subspaces and the reflexivity of isometries, Math

    H. Bercovici,A factorization theorem with applications to invariant subspaces and the reflexivity of isometries, Math. Res. Lett.,1(1994), 511-518

    work page 1994

  8. [7]

    Bhattacharyya, B

    T. Bhattacharyya, B. K. Das, and H. Sau,Toeplitz Operators on the Symmetrized Bidisc, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN,11(2021), 8492-8520

    work page 2021

Show all 42 references
  1. [8]

    Brown and P.R

    A. Brown and P.R. Halmos,Algebraic properties of Toeplitz operators, J. Reine Angew. Math., 213(1963/64), 89-102

    1963

  2. [9]

    Cartan,Sur les domaines born´ es homog´ enes de l’espace den variables complexes, Abh

    ´E. Cartan,Sur les domaines born´ es homog´ enes de l’espace den variables complexes, Abh. Math. Semin. Univ. Hambg.,11(1935), 116-162

    1935

  3. [10]

    Chavan and D

    S. Chavan and D. Yakubovich,Spherical tuples of Hilbert space operators, Indiana Univ. Math. J.64(2015), 577-612

    2015

  4. [11]

    Ch¯ o, W

    M. Ch¯ o, W. ˙Zelazko,On geometric spectral radius radius of commutingn-tuples of operators, Hokkaido Math. J.,21(1992), 251–258

    1992

  5. [12]

    Conway,A course in operator theory, Grad

    J.B. Conway,A course in operator theory, Grad. Stud. Math.,21, American Mathematical Society, Rhode Island (2000)

    2000

  6. [13]

    Davie and N.P

    A.M. Davie and N.P. Jewell,Toeplitz operator in several complex variables, J. Funct. Anal.,26 (1977), 356-368. CARTAN ISOMETRY 21

    1977

  7. [14]

    Ding,Products of Toeplitz operators in polydisc, Integral Equations Operator Theory,45(2003), 389-403

    X. Ding,Products of Toeplitz operators in polydisc, Integral Equations Operator Theory,45(2003), 389-403

    2003

  8. [15]

    X. Ding, S. Sun, and D. Zheng,Commuting Toeplitz operators on the bidisk, J. Funct. Anal.,263 (2012), 3333-3357

    2012

  9. [16]

    Didas,Spherical isometries are reflexive, Integral Equations Operator Theory,52(2005), 599-604

    M. Didas,Spherical isometries are reflexive, Integral Equations Operator Theory,52(2005), 599-604

    2005

  10. [17]

    Didas and J

    M. Didas and J. Eschmeier,Inner functions and Spherical isometries, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 139(2011), 2877-2889

    2011

  11. [18]

    Didas, J

    M. Didas, J. Eschmeier, and K. Everard,On the essential commutant of analytic Toeplitz operators associated with spherical isometries, J. Funct. Anal.,261(2011), 1361-1383

    2011

  12. [19]

    Didas, J

    M. Didas, J. Eschmeier, and D. Schillo,On Scahtten-class perturbation of Toeplitz operators, J. Funct. Anal.,272(2017), 2442-2462

    2017

  13. [20]

    R. G. Douglas,Banach Algebra Techniques in Operator Theory, second edition, Graduate Texts in Mathematics,179, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998

    1998

  14. [21]

    Engliˇ s,Toeplitz operators and the Berezin transform onH 2, Linear Algebra Appl.223/224 (1995), 171–204

    M. Engliˇ s,Toeplitz operators and the Berezin transform onH 2, Linear Algebra Appl.223/224 (1995), 171–204

    1995

  15. [22]

    Eschmeier,On the reflexivity of multivariable isometries, Proc

    J. Eschmeier,On the reflexivity of multivariable isometries, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.,134(2005), 1783-1789

    2005

  16. [23]

    Faraut and A

    J. Faraut and A. Koranyi,Function spaces and reproducing kernels on bounded symmetric do- mains, J. Funct. Anal.,88(1990), 64-89

    1990

  17. [25]

    Ghosh and S

    G. Ghosh and S. S. Roy,Toeplitz operators on the proper images of bounded symmetric domains, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.08002

    doi arXiv

  18. [26]

    Gleason and S

    J. Gleason and S. Richter,m-Isometric Commuting Tuples of Operators on a Hilbert Space, Integral Equations Operator Theory,56(2006), 181–196

    2006

  19. [27]

    Gu,Examples ofm-isometric tuples of operators on a Hilbert space, J

    C. Gu,Examples ofm-isometric tuples of operators on a Hilbert space, J. Korean Math. Soc.55 (2018), 225–251

    2018

  20. [28]

    Jain and P

    S. Jain and P. Pramanick,Toeplitz operators on the n-dimensional Hartogs triangle, to appear in J. Operator Theory (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Koran´ yi,The Poisson integral for generalized half-planes and bounded symmetric domains, Ann

    A. Koran´ yi,The Poisson integral for generalized half-planes and bounded symmetric domains, Ann. of Math. (2),82(1965), 332–350

    1965

  22. [30]

    Koran´ yni and J

    A. Koran´ yni and J. A. Wolf,Realization of hermitian symmetric spaces as generalized half-planes, Ann. of Math. (2)81(1965), 265–288

    1965

  23. [31]

    Loos,Bounded symmetric domains and Jordan pairs, University of California, Irvine, 1977

    O. Loos,Bounded symmetric domains and Jordan pairs, University of California, Irvine, 1977

    1977

  24. [32]

    Mackey and P

    M. Mackey and P. Mellon,The Bergmann-Shilov boundary of a Bounded Symmetric Domain, Math. Proc. R. Ir. Acad.,121A( 2021), 33-49

    2021

  25. [33]

    A. Maji, J. Sarkar, and S. Sarkar,Toeplitz and asymptotic Toeplitz operators onH 2(Dn), Bull. Sci. Math.,146(2018), 33–49

    2018

  26. [34]

    Narasimhan,Several complex variables, Chicago Lect

    R. Narasimhan,Several complex variables, Chicago Lect. Math., The University of Chicago Press, (1971)

    1971

  27. [35]

    Prunaru,Some exact sequences for Toeplitz algebras of spherical isometries, Proc

    B. Prunaru,Some exact sequences for Toeplitz algebras of spherical isometries, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.,135(2007), 3621-3630

    2007

  28. [36]

    Upmeier,Toeplitz operators on bounded symmetric domains, Trans

    H. Upmeier,Toeplitz operators on bounded symmetric domains, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.,280 (1983), 221-237

    1983

  29. [37]

    of Math.,119(1984), 549-576

    ,ToeplitzC ∗-algebras on bounded symmetric domains, Ann. of Math.,119(1984), 549-576

    1984

  30. [38]

    Upmeier,Toeplitz operators on symmetric Siegel domains, Math

    H. Upmeier,Toeplitz operators on symmetric Siegel domains, Math. Ann.,271(1985), 401–414

    1985

  31. [39]

    ,Jordan algebras and harmonic analysis on symmetric spaces, Amer. J. Math.,108(1986), 1-25

    1986

  32. [40]

    ,Toeplitz operators and index theory in several complex variables, Operator Theory Ad- vances and Applications,81, Birkh¨ auser, 1996

    1996

  33. [41]

    ,Eigenvalues ofK-invariant Toeplitz operators on bounded symmetric domains, Integral Equations Operator Theory,93, (2021), Article no. 27

    2021

  34. [42]

    N. J. Weiss,Almost everywhere convergence of Poisson integrals on generalized half-planes, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.,74(1968), 533–537. 22 S. KUMAR, M. K. MAL, AND P. PRAMANICK (S. Kumar)Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chen- nai 600036, India Ema...

    1968

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.