Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 43 references

Observation of ferron transport in ferroelectrics

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read The paper reports direct observation of ferron transport: ferroelectric quasiparticles that carry polarization information over micrometer distances at room temperature in PMN-PT, through nonlocal injection and detection by permalloy…

desk verdict First experimental claim of ferron transport, with clean symmetry-resolved data, but the interpretation leans on the same group's theory and lacks the controls that would nail it. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.24419 v1 pith:RUH3I4XG submitted 2025-05-30 physics.app-ph

classification physics.app-ph PACS 77.80.-e72.25.-b75.70.-i85.75.-d
keywords ferronferroelectricPMN-PTnonlocaltransportdynamicalmagnetoelectriccouplingspinHalleffectquasiparticleferronics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports direct experimental evidence that “ferrons”—collective excitations of electric dipolar order in a ferroelectric—can carry signals at room temperature. In a nonlocal device made of two permalloy strips on the ferroelectric PMN-PT, the spin Hall effect in the injector creates a non-equilibrium electric field that excites ferrons through the dipolar Stark interaction $H_{\mathrm{int}}=-\mathbf{E}\cdot\mathbf{P}$; the ferrons diffuse to the detector, where the reciprocal process produces a voltage. The signal decays exponentially with contact spacing, giving a ferron diffusion length of $14.8 \pm 1.2\,\mu\mathrm{m}$, and reverses sign when the ferroelectric polarization is switched by an electric field. A sympathetic reader would take this as establishing ferrons as usable carriers for low-dissipation information transport, analogous to magnons in magnetic insulators.

What carries the argument

The central object is the ferron, the bosonic collective excitation of ferroelectric order, whose transport is governed by diffusion of a non-equilibrium ferron chemical potential $\mu_f$ obeying $\partial_x^2\mu_f = \lambda_f^{-2}\mu_f$. The operative mechanism is dynamical magnetoelectric coupling at a ferromagnetic/ferroelectric interface: spin accumulation in a ferromagnetic contact generates an effective electric field that acts on the polarization through the dipolar Stark interaction $H_{\mathrm{int}}=-\mathbf{E}\cdot\mathbf{P}$, and the inverse process converts ferron accumulation back into a voltage. This mechanism is encoded in the measured response $V_{nl}\approx A m_z^2 I + B m_z P_x I^3$, whose two terms have distinct magnetization angular symmetry, current order, and dependence on the ferroelectric polarization $P_x$.

What would settle it

Repeat the identical two-strip nonlocal measurement with a PMN-PT substrate driven into its paraelectric phase, or with a non-ferroelectric substrate, while keeping the same fields and currents; a surviving $m_z$-dependent, distance-decaying voltage would disprove the ferron attribution. Equivalently, verify that the linear-response term $A m_z^2 I$ vanishes when the ferroelectric polarization and susceptibility are suppressed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Ferrons are the elementary excitations of electric dipolar order in a ferroelectric, the electric analogue of magnons. The authors show that a ferromagnetic metal contact can inject ferrons into a ferroelectric insulator by dynamical magnetoelectric coupling: a charge current in permalloy creates a spin accumulation whose gradient generates an effective electric field $\mathbf{E}=-(\alpha_P/e)\nabla_\perp \mu_s$, which couples to the ferroelectric polarization via $H_{\mathrm{int}}=-\mathbf{E}\cdot\mathbf{P}$. The injected ferrons diffuse through PMN-PT and, at a second permalloy contact, the reciprocal process produces a nonlocal voltage. The measured signal follows $V_{nl}\approx A m_z^2 I + B m_z P_x I^3$; the $m_z^2 I$ term is the linear-response ferron transport, while the $m_z P_x I^3$ term reveals the sign of the ferroelectric polarization and tracks the polarization hysteresis loop of PMN-PT. The exponential decay of the signal with contact separation yields a ferron diffusion length of $14.8 \pm 1.2\,\mu\mathrm{m}$, establishing long-range room-temperature transport of electric polarization carried by ferrons.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the nonlocal voltage is carried by ferron quasiparticles generated through the dipolar Stark coupling at the permalloy/PMN-PT interface rather than by some other magnetoelectric, charge, or thermal pathway; the paper does not report a control measurement on a non-ferroelectric or paraelectric substrate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the interpretation is correct, ferroelectric insulators can serve as conductors of polarization information over micrometer distances at room temperature, without moving charges or Joule heating in the channel.
  • The ferron diffusion length of about 15 μm is similar to magnon diffusion lengths in room-temperature magnetic-insulator devices, suggesting ferrons are a practical complement to magnons.
  • Because the $m_z P_x I^3$ component reverses sign with ferroelectric polarization and reproduces the polarization hysteresis loop, the same device can act as a read-out of the ferroelectric state.
  • Rotation of the contact magnetization from out-of-plane to in-plane switches off the ferron signal, providing a magnetic control knob, while gate electric fields provide an independent electric control knob.
  • The antiparallel polarity of injection and detection currents, opposite to the parallel polarity in magnon transport, gives a clear experimental fingerprint for identifying ferron-mediated signals in other materials.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The fastest falsification of the ferron attribution would be a control device on a non-ferroelectric substrate or on PMN-PT driven into its paraelectric phase; the paper reports no such control, so this is an open experimental check.
  • If the transport here is real, the same contacts should reveal the predicted thermal and thermoelectric signatures of ferrons, such as an electric-field-tunable thermal conductivity and a nonlocal thermovoltage under a temperature gradient.
  • The polarization-dependent cubic term could be exploited as a magnetoelectric logic or memory element, since it is nonzero only when the magnetization is out of plane and the ferroelectric polarization is finite.
  • Thin-film ferroelectrics already used in microelectronics, such as hafnium-zirconium oxide, are natural candidates for on-chip ferron channels; whether their domain structure supports micrometer-scale ferron diffusion is an open question.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports nonlocal voltage measurements in permalloy (Py)/PMN-PT devices and interprets them as injection, diffusion, and detection of 'ferron' quasiparticles, the collective excitations of ferroelectric order. The antisymmetrized nonlocal voltage is decomposed into a component proportional to m_z^2 I and a component proportional to m_z P_x I^3, where m_z is the out-of-plane magnetization of the Py electrodes, P_x the ferroelectric polarization, and I the injected current. The authors show that the cubic component reverses sign when P_x is switched, tracks the ferroelectric hysteresis loop, and decays exponentially with injector-detector spacing, yielding a ferron diffusion length of 14.8 ± 1.2 μm. The central claim is that these observations establish long-range room-temperature ferron transport mediated by dynamical magnetoelectric coupling at ferromagnet/ferroelectric interfaces.

Significance. If the interpretation is correct, this would be the first experimental evidence of ferron transport and would open a new subfield of 'ferronics', closely paralleling magnon spintronics. The paper has several strengths: a symmetry-resolved decomposition of the signal, a clear polarization-reversal and hysteresis correlation, a current-scaling analysis (linear vs. cubic), and an exponential distance dependence with a quoted diffusion length. The predicted antiparallel current polarity in injection and detection is a distinctive, falsifiable feature that separates ferrons from magnons in the same geometry. However, the attribution of the observed signal to ferrons is not uniquely established: the paper lacks control experiments on non-ferroelectric substrates or in the paraelectric phase, and the quantitative diffusion-length extraction relies on a term whose spatial decay is not explicitly derived. The theoretical framework is also largely from the same group and has not been independently benchmarked.

major comments (3)
  1. [Experimental setup and Figure 2] The manuscript provides no control measurement on a non-ferroelectric substrate, in the paraelectric phase of the same PMN-PT crystal, or with a nonmagnetic detector. All data are from Py/PMN-PT devices described in the Methods. As a result, the polarization- and magnetization-dependent nonlocal voltage V_odd_nl in Eq. (1) could in principle arise from a polarization-modulated electrical, strain, or thermal artifact (e.g., leakage, magnetoresistance, or anomalous Nernst contributions), rather than from ferron diffusion. A control experiment with identical electrodes on a non-ferroelectric insulator or on PMN-PT above its Curie temperature would be needed to establish that the signal is specifically carried by the ferroelectric order; without such a control, the central attribution to ferrons is not uniquely established.
  2. [Methods, Eqs. (10)-(12)] The symmetry derivation of the cubic term is internally inconsistent. Under the mirror operation M_y (normal to y), the polarization component P_x lies in the mirror plane and is unchanged, while m_z changes sign and I changes sign. The proposed term B m_z P_x I^3 is therefore even under M_y, whereas Eq. (11) requires the odd-current part of V_nl to be odd under M_y. With standard transformations for polar and axial vectors, Eq. (12) does not follow from the stated conditions; the leading odd-in-I terms allowed by those conditions would be even in m_z. The symmetry-based identification of the V_mz component as the ferron-mediated signal needs to be re-derived or clarified, since this term is the central experimental signature of the paper.
  3. [Methods, Eqs. (8)-(9), and Figure 4] The exponential decay e^{-d/λ_f} is derived in Eq. (8) for the ferron chemical potential, and Eq. (9) applies it to the linear term V_nl ∝ m_z^2 I. However, the quoted diffusion length λ ≈ 14.8 ± 1.2 μm is extracted from the cubic term ΔV_mz (Figure 4), which is introduced in Eq. (12) only by a symmetry argument. No transport equation or boundary-value problem is presented for the cubic term, and the text does not explicitly state that its spatial decay is also governed by the same diffusion equation. If the detection step is linear in the ferron accumulation, this is plausible, but it should be stated and justified explicitly; otherwise the spatial decay of the quantity being fitted is not derived.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Main text] In the sentence 'Direct evidence for ferron transport arises from the the electric-field reversal...' there is a repeated 'the'; please correct this typo.
  2. [Main text, Eq. (1)] The symbols V_m2z and V_mz are not explicitly defined; please state that V_m2z is the component of V_odd_nl that is even under m_z → -m_z and V_mz is the component that is odd under m_z → -m_z.
  3. [Methods, Eq. (7)] The quantity N_F is described as the density of states at the Fermi level but does not appear in Eq. (7); please either remove it or use it in the equation.
  4. [Extended Data Figure 5] The caption repeats the phrase 'on the injector-detector spacing d' although the figure shows the dependence on the angle α; this appears to be a copy-paste error.
  5. [Methods] Please state explicitly that all measurements are performed at room temperature and provide the magnetic-field sweep rate and the current excitation details (pulsed or dc, averaging time) so that the experiments can be reproduced.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity: coefficients and diffusion length are fitted, not predicted; same-group ferron theory motivates but does not define the measured symmetries.

full rationale

The paper's central quantities are extracted from data rather than derived from the ferron model. Eq. (13) is a symmetry decomposition fitted to raw traces with a cos^2(theta) + b cos(theta) + c, and the current scalings (linear and cubic) are consistency checks of that decomposition, not independent predictions. The ferron diffusion length in Eq. (2) is obtained by fitting Delta V_mz versus distance; no numerical value is claimed a priori, so this is parameter extraction, not a prediction disguised as a result. The Methods derives the exponential decay for the linear m_z^2 term and uses symmetry for the cubic m_z P_x I^3 term; the extension of the exponential decay to the cubic term is an unstated modeling assumption rather than a circular reduction. The ferron concept is motivated by refs. 4-10, which include co-authors, but the experimental evidence cited for the claim - sign reversal with P_x, coercive-field hysteresis, and m_z angular dependence - is generated in this paper and is not logically forced by those references. The absence of a paraelectric or non-ferroelectric control weakens the attribution of the signal to ferron transport, but that is a correctness/identification risk, not an instance of a conclusion being equivalent to its input by construction. Under the evidentiary standard required for a circularity finding, no step meets the bar; score 2 reflects the same-group theoretical framing without treating it as load-bearing.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on a number of fitted coefficients (A, B, lambda_f) and on theoretical assumptions about spin-charge coupling and the ferron diffusion model, most of which originate from the same group's prior work. The only potentially independent element is the polarization-switching hysteresis, but it is still interpreted through the ferron model.

free parameters (4)
  • A
    Coefficient of the linear term V_nl ≈ A m_z^2 I in Eq. (13), fit to the amplitude of the cos^2(theta) component. Contains material parameters such as ferroelectric susceptibility and detector efficiency.
  • B
    Coefficient of the cubic term B m_z P_x I^3 in Eq. (13), fit to the cubic current dependence of the cos(theta) component. Not derived quantitatively.
  • lambda_f = 14.8 ± 1.2 μm
    Ferron diffusion length extracted from the exponential fit Delta V_mz = C exp(-d/lambda_f) in Fig. 4. This parameter is fit to the data, not predicted by the theory.
  • C (detector efficiency)
    Dimensionless detector efficiency introduced in Eq. (9) and not determined; absorbs unknown interface and detection factors.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The spin-charge coupling equations for ferromagnetic metals (Eqs. 3-9) describe the spin accumulation and effective electric field generation.
    The theory of spin Hall effect, spin diffusion, and spin-charge coupling in Py is taken from standard spintronics literature and assumed to hold in the experimental geometry.
  • domain assumption The dipolar Stark interaction H_int = -E·P is the mechanism by which an electric field excites ferrons in the ferroelectric.
    Invoked in the Methods and in Figure 1c as the coupling between the spin-generated electric field and the ferroelectric polarization. This is a theoretical assumption, not directly verified.
  • domain assumption Ferron transport obeys a linear diffusion equation ∂_x^2 μ_f = lambda_f^{-2} μ_f with a single diffusion length lambda_f.
    Used in Eq. (8) and the distance-dependence fit. The linear diffusion model is an assumption about the ferron hydrodynamics, not derived from first principles in this paper.
  • standard math The symmetry constraints in Eqs. (10)-(12) under mirror operations fully determine the allowed current and polarization dependences.
    The derivation of V_nl ≈ A m_z^2 I + B m_z P_x I^3 relies on mirror symmetry arguments that are standard but assume the relevant order parameters transform as stated.
invented entities (1)
  • Ferron quasiparticle
    purpose: Carrier of electric polarization transport in ferroelectrics, analogous to magnons in magnets.
    The paper interprets its measured signal as ferron transport, but the quasiparticle is not directly detected with an independent probe. The evidence consists of macroscopic nonlocal voltages and polarization switching, both interpreted within the same theoretical framework. There is no external handle such as a predicted resonance or mass that could be confirmed independently.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Observation of ferron transport in ferroelectrics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RUH3I4XG

@misc{pith2026250524419,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Observation of ferron transport in ferroelectrics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RUH3I4XG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.24419}
}
read the original abstract

Ferroelectrics feature spontaneous electric dipolar order reconfigurable via electric fields. Recent theoretical studies of the collective excitations of this electric dipolar order give rise to the hope that "ferron" quasiparticles may complement the magnons of magnetic materials in information and heat management technologies. Yet direct experimental evidence of ferron transport remains elusive. Here we demonstrate efficient ferron injection and detection enabled by ferromagnetic metal contacts, achieving nonlocal signal transmission over micrometer distances in a prototypical ferroelectric PMN-PT. The transmission efficiency can be switched by external magnetic fields that couple to the contacts and gate electric fields that control the ferron excitations. Ferron-based devices open new power saving strategies that employ ferroelectric materials in a future sustainable information society.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.24419 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Ferron excitation and detection. a, b, The magnon excitation and detection in mag￾netic insulators with in-plane magnetization by the spin Hall effect and inverse spin Hall effect in a heavy metal contacts. The injected current density jINJ and the detected current density jDET are parallel along y-axis. c, The ferron excitation by a ferromagnetic metal contact on top of a ferroelectric film, where jINJ is a charge … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Symmetry-resolved nonlocal signal of ferron transport. a, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Electric field control of ferron transport. a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Long-range diffusive transport of ferrons. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Mater .17, 1095–1100 (2018)

    Wei, Y .et al.A rhombohedral ferroelectric phase in epitaxially strained Hf 0.5Zr0.5O2 thin films.Nat. Mater .17, 1095–1100 (2018)

  2. [2]

    Wang, Y .et al.A stable rhombohedral phase in ferroelectric Hf(Zr) 1+xO2 capacitor with ultralow coercive field.Science381, 558–563 (2023)

  3. [3]

    Meier, D.et al.Anisotropic conductance at improper ferroelectric domain walls.Nat. Mater . 11, 284–288 (2012)

  4. [4]

    & Bauer, G

    Tang, P., Iguchi, R., Uchida, K.-i. & Bauer, G. E. Excitations of the ferroelectric order.Phys. Rev. B106, L081105 (2022)

  5. [5]

    & Bauer, G

    Tang, P., Iguchi, R., Uchida, K.-i. & Bauer, G. E. W. Thermoelectric polarization transport in ferroelectric ballistic point contacts.Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 047601 (2022)

  6. [6]

    & Bauer, G

    Tang, P., Uchida, K.-i. & Bauer, G. E. W. Nonlocal drag thermoelectricity generated by ferroelectric van der waals heterostructures.Phys. Rev. B107, L121406 (2023)

  7. [7]

    & Bauer, G

    Tang, P. & Bauer, G. E. Electric analog of magnons in order-disorder ferroelectrics.Phys. Rev. B109, L060301 (2024)

  8. [8]

    Bauer, G. E. W., Iguchi, R. & Uchida, K.-i. Theory of transport in ferroelectric capacitors. Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 187603 (2021)

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    E., Tang, P., Iguchi, R

    Bauer, G. E., Tang, P., Iguchi, R. & Uchida, K.-i. Magnonics vs. ferronics.J. Magn. Magn. Mater .541, 168468 (2022)

  2. [10]

    E.et al.Polarization transport in ferroelectrics.Phys

    Bauer, G. E.et al.Polarization transport in ferroelectrics.Phys. Rev. Appl.20, 050501 (2023)

  3. [11]

    Mater .18, 931–935 (2019)

    Chen, X.et al.Electric field control of n ´eel spin–orbit torque in an antiferromagnet.Nat. Mater .18, 931–935 (2019)

  4. [12]

    Mater .20, 800–804 (2021)

    Chen, X.et al.Observation of the antiferromagnetic spin hall effect.Nat. Mater .20, 800–804 (2021)

  5. [13]

    & Buhrman, R

    Liu, L., Moriyama, T., Ralph, D. & Buhrman, R. Spin-torque ferromagnetic resonance induced by the spin hall effect.Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 036601 (2011)

  6. [14]

    M.et al.Perpendicular switching of a single ferromagnetic layer induced by in-plane current injection.Nature476, 189–193 (2011)

    Miron, I. M.et al.Perpendicular switching of a single ferromagnetic layer induced by in-plane current injection.Nature476, 189–193 (2011)

  7. [15]

    Liu, L.et al.Spin-torque switching with the giant spin hall effect of tantalum.Science336, 555–558 (2012)

  8. [16]

    Chen, X.et al.Antidamping-torque-induced switching in biaxial antiferromagnetic insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 207204 (2018). 9

  9. [17]

    Electron.5, 574–578 (2022)

    Chen, X.et al.Control of spin current and antiferromagnetic moments via topological surface state.Nat. Electron.5, 574–578 (2022)

  10. [18]

    Nature613, 490–495 (2023)

    Chen, X.et al.Octupole-driven magnetoresistance in an antiferromagnetic tunnel junction. Nature613, 490–495 (2023)

  11. [19]

    A.et al.Functional electronic inversion layers at ferroelectric domain walls.Nat

    Mundy, J. A.et al.Functional electronic inversion layers at ferroelectric domain walls.Nat. Mater .16, 622–627 (2017)

  12. [20]

    C.et al.Complementary logic operation based on electric-field controlled spin– orbit torques.Nat

    Baek, S.-h. C.et al.Complementary logic operation based on electric-field controlled spin– orbit torques.Nat. Electron.1, 398–403 (2018)

  13. [21]

    C.et al.Spin currents and spin–orbit torques in ferromagnetic trilayers.Nat

    Baek, S.-h. C.et al.Spin currents and spin–orbit torques in ferromagnetic trilayers.Nat. Mater .17, 509–513 (2018)

  14. [22]

    Electron.5, 217–223 (2022)

    Ryu, J.et al.Efficient spin–orbit torque in magnetic trilayers using all three polarizations of a spin current.Nat. Electron.5, 217–223 (2022)

  15. [23]

    Commun.13, 3783 (2022)

    Choi, J.-G.et al.V oltage-driven gigahertz frequency tuning of spin hall nano-oscillators.Nat. Commun.13, 3783 (2022)

  16. [24]

    Kang, J.et al.Current-induced manipulation of exchange bias in IrMn/NiFe bilayer structures. Nat. Commun.12, 6420 (2021)

  17. [25]

    & Finocchio, G

    Puliafito, V ., Sanchez-Tejerina, L., Carpentieri, M., Azzerboni, B. & Finocchio, G. Modula- tion, injection locking, and pulling in an antiferromagnetic spin-orbit torque oscillator.IEEE Trans. Magn.57, 1–6 (2021)

  18. [26]

    R.et al.Dynamical neural network based on spin transfer nano-oscillators

    Rodrigues, D. R.et al.Dynamical neural network based on spin transfer nano-oscillators. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol.22, 800–805 (2023)

  19. [27]

    Mater .22, 1106–1113 (2023)

    Yoon, J.-Y .et al.Handedness anomaly in a non-collinear antiferromagnet under spin–orbit torque.Nat. Mater .22, 1106–1113 (2023)

  20. [28]

    Fan, Y .et al.Coherent magnon-induced domain-wall motion in a magnetic insulator channel. Nat. Nanotechnol.18, 1000–1004 (2023)

  21. [29]

    T., Siddiqui, S

    Han, J., Zhang, P., Hou, J. T., Siddiqui, S. A. & Liu, L. Mutual control of coherent spin waves and magnetic domain walls in a magnonic device.Science366, 1121–1125 (2019)

  22. [30]

    Wang, Y .et al.Magnetization switching by magnon-mediated spin torque through an antifer- romagnetic insulator.Science366, 1125–1128 (2019)

  23. [31]

    Nanotechnol.19, 1478–1484 (2024)

    Wang, F.et al.Deterministic switching of perpendicular magnetization by out-of-plane anti- damping magnon torques.Nat. Nanotechnol.19, 1478–1484 (2024)

  24. [32]

    Kajiwara, Y .et al.Transmission of electrical signals by spin-wave interconversion in a mag- netic insulator.Nature464, 262–266 (2010). 10

  25. [33]

    & van Wees, B

    Cornelissen, L., Liu, J., Duine, R., Youssef, J. & van Wees, B. Long-distance transport of magnon spin information in a magnetic insulator at room temperature.Nat. Phys.11, 1022– 1026 (2015)

  26. [34]

    S., Liu, J., van Wees, B

    Das, K. S., Liu, J., van Wees, B. J. & Vera-Marun, I. J. Efficient injection and detection of out-of-plane spins via the anomalous spin hall effect in permalloy nanowires.Nano Lett.18, 5633–5639 (2018)

  27. [35]

    Lebrun, R.et al.Tunable long-distance spin transport in a crystalline antiferromagnetic iron oxide.Nature561, 222–225 (2018)

  28. [36]

    Nanotechnol.15, 563–568 (2020)

    Han, J.et al.Birefringence-like spin transport via linearly polarized antiferromagnetic magnons.Nat. Nanotechnol.15, 563–568 (2020)

  29. [37]

    Huang, X.et al.Manipulating chiral spin transport with ferroelectric polarization.Nat. Mater . 1–7 (2024)

  30. [38]

    Commun.10, 4740 (2019)

    Oyanagi, K.et al.Spin transport in insulators without exchange stiffness.Nat. Commun.10, 4740 (2019)

  31. [39]

    Schlitz, R.et al.Electrically induced angular momentum flow between separated ferromag- nets.Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 256701 (2024)

  32. [40]

    L.et al.Electric field–dependent phonon spectrum and heat conduction in ferro- electrics.Sci

    Wooten, B. L.et al.Electric field–dependent phonon spectrum and heat conduction in ferro- electrics.Sci. Adv.9, eadd7194 (2023)

  33. [41]

    M., Fechner, M., Balatsky, A

    Juraschek, D. M., Fechner, M., Balatsky, A. V . & Spaldin, N. A. Dynamical multiferroicity. Phys. Rev. Mater .1, 014401 (2017)

  34. [42]

    Basini, M.et al.Terahertz electric-field-driven dynamical multiferroicity in SrTiO 3.Nature 628, 534–539 (2024)

  35. [43]

    O.et al.Unidirectional spin hall magnetoresistance in ferromagnet/normal metal bilayers.Nat

    Avci, C. O.et al.Unidirectional spin hall magnetoresistance in ferromagnet/normal metal bilayers.Nat. Phys.11, 570–575 (2015). 11 Methods Sample and device fabrication The bilayers used in this study were grown by magnetron sputtering. A 15 nm Py layer was grown on the (001)-o...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.