Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 18 references

Operation of a dual-phase xenon detector with wavelength sensitivity from ultraviolet to infrared

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A dual-phase xenon detector can read out infrared scintillation from both liquid and gas, alongside ultraviolet light, giving rare-event searches a second wavelength channel.

desk verdict First dual-phase TPC with simultaneous UV/IR readout: a genuine first measurement with honest limitations, but the quantitative IR time response is not yet nailed down. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.24682 v2 pith:YL3AQTRI submitted 2025-05-30 physics.ins-det hep-ex

Robert Hammann , Kai Böse , Steffen Form , Luisa Hötzsch , Teresa Marrodán Undagoitia This is my paper
classification physics.ins-dethep-ex PACS 29.40.Mc
keywords liquidxenonscintillationinfraredradiationdarkmatternoblegasdetectorstimeprojectionchamberelectroluminescencedual-phasedetector
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first operation of a dual-phase xenon time projection chamber whose readout covers 170 nm to 1700 nm, and shows that infrared photons arrive in coincidence with both the prompt ultraviolet scintillation from the liquid and the electroluminescence from the gas. The infrared time response contains a fast component and a dominant slow decay of about 30 microseconds that has not previously been reported for xenon, and the infrared rate from electroluminescence rises as the gas amplification field is increased from about 9 to 15 kV/cm. If correct, the finding gives xenon-based detectors an additional wavelength channel that could improve particle identification and background rejection in dark matter and neutrinoless double-beta decay searches.

What carries the argument

The central object is a dual-phase xenon time projection chamber that pairs the standard ultraviolet readout with an infrared-sensitive photomultiplier covering roughly 300 nm to 1.65 µm, so the same event is viewed in two widely separated wavelength bands. Alpha decays from a radon calibration source tag events, and the drift-time relation between the UV S1 and S2 pulses lets each IR pulse be assigned to either liquid scintillation or gas electroluminescence. The load-bearing measurement is the distribution of IR arrival times relative to the UV S1 and S2 peaks, fit with sums of exponentials, together with the rate of IR photons as a function of the gas-field strength.

What would settle it

Insert a long-pass optical filter that transmits only wavelengths above about 1 µm in front of the infrared sensor and repeat the electroluminescence-coincidence measurement; if the ~30 microsecond component disappears or shrinks dramatically, it was not xenon's 1.3 µm scintillation but shorter-wavelength light or a sensor artefact. Alternatively, operating the sensor at its design bias and observing the same time profile would argue the tail is a real xenon emission feature.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In a small dual-phase xenon time projection chamber instrumented with one ultraviolet-sensitive and one infrared-sensitive photomultiplier, the authors observe IR photons in coincidence with both the prompt liquid scintillation (S1UV) and the gas-phase electroluminescence (S2UV). The IR pulses following the electroluminescence signal are described by a fast, poorly resolved component of about one-third of the signal, a ~1.7 microsecond component, and a dominant ~30 microsecond component that makes up roughly half of the total; a similar ~20 microsecond tail follows the S1UV signal. The number of IR photons associated with electroluminescence increases monotonically with the amplification field, and the ratio of IR to UV signal may not be constant across fields. The authors conclude that xenon emits infrared scintillation during electroluminescence and that this emission, with its distinct time structure, could serve as an additional readout channel.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusions assume the infrared sensor's pulses are really xenon's infrared light, even though the sensor was run below its design voltage and also responds to shorter wavelengths; if the slow 30-microsecond tail or much of the coincident signal comes from the sensor itself, from surrounding materials, or from shorter-wavelength xenon emission, the time-response claims weaken.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The infrared channel can act as a second, wavelength-separated measure of electroluminescence, since its rate grows with the gas amplification field.
  • If the fast IR component fraction differs between alpha-induced and electron-induced signals, IR pulse shape could help identify particle types in the gas.
  • Comparing IR and UV signals could help reject accidental coincidences, such as distinguishing single-electron S2-like signals from true S1 signals.
  • The dominant ~30 microsecond IR tail, if genuine xenon emission, sets a timescale that future IR-readout designs must accommodate.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not establish that the 30 microsecond component is xenon emission; testing it with a long-pass filter that blocks light below 1 µm would separate xenon's 1.3 µm continuum from shorter-wavelength contaminants and sensor effects.
  • If the liquid-phase IR yield is genuinely two orders of magnitude below the gas-phase yield, as earlier work suggests, the practical payoff is likely to come from the gas electroluminescence channel rather than from S1 readout; the paper's own data cannot quantify the liquid yield.
  • A high-speed digitizer and correctly biased infrared sensor could resolve the unresolved fast component and test whether it matches the ~26 ns UV S1 decay constant, which would strengthen the case that the IR fast component is scintillation rather than an artefact.
  • The apparent non-constant IR-to-UV ratio across fields hints that the two emissions are produced by different excitation pathways; a precision measurement of this ratio could probe the underlying electroluminescence mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports measurements with a dual-phase xenon TPC (HeXe) instrumented with both a UV-sensitive and an IR-sensitive PMT, covering 170 nm to 1700 nm. Using internal alpha events, the authors observe IR-channel pulses coincident with S1UV and S2UV signals, study the time structure of the IR signals relative to each, and measure the dependence of the IR rate following S2UV on the gas amplification field. They report a fast (~30 ns) and a slow (~20 µs) component after S1UV, and for S2UV a three-component structure with a dominant ~30 µs decay. They also find the IR rate per alpha event increases with field, and they discuss possible origins including xenon IR scintillation, third continuum, neutral bremsstrahlung, delayed electrons, material fluorescence, and PMT artifacts. The paper explicitly acknowledges that the IR PMT was operated at a suboptimal photocathode bias and that PMT-related or wavelength-contamination effects cannot be ruled out.

Significance. If the observed signals are genuine xenon IR scintillation, the work would be the first dual-phase TPC measurement with UV-to-IR sensitivity and would open a new readout channel for particle identification and background rejection. The time-structure results, particularly the ~30 µs component, would be a new property of electroluminescence-induced IR emission. The paper is also candid about its limitations, which is commendable. However, because the central identification rests on a PMT operated outside its design bias and with sensitivity down to 300 nm, the quantitative conclusions are not yet secured; the significance of the claimed new physics therefore remains conditional on additional verification.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.2] The IR PMT was operated at a photocathode bias of about -1 V instead of the design value of -4.75 V, so the quantum efficiency at the xenon IR wavelength is unknown. The paper acknowledges this but does not provide any calibration or cross-check. Since all quantitative statements about the IR signal, including the relative fractions of the decay components in Fig. 6 and the field-dependent rates in Fig. 8, scale directly with the quantum efficiency, the central quantitative claims are not robust until the actual QE is measured or the bias is corrected.
  2. [Figure 2 and Section 5] The R5509-73 PMT is sensitive from 300 nm to 1650 nm, so the observed coincidence signals could include third-continuum, neutral-bremsstrahlung, or material-fluorescence photons rather than xenon IR scintillation. The paper argues that the third continuum is subdominant based on literature sub-percent levels in electroluminescence and on the nominal QE curve, but the QE at the actual operating bias is unknown; if the short-wavelength response degrades less than the 1.3 µm response, the contamination could be comparable to the IR signal. A wavelength-filter measurement or a direct spectral diagnostic is needed to support the IR interpretation.
  3. [Section 5 (Discussion) and Figure 6] The dominant ~30 µs component after S2UV overlaps the expected time scale for PMT afterpulsing or delayed photoelectron extraction from a mis-biased InP/InGaAs photocathode, and the authors state that they cannot rule out a PMT-related effect. This component accounts for more than half of the total IR signal integral, so the claimed time response and the field dependence of the IR rate could be partly or wholly instrumental. A control measurement with the correct bias voltage, a different PMT, or a pulsed light source would be required to establish that this component is intrinsic to xenon.
  4. [Section 4.2, Figure 8] The field-dependence result is presented as supporting IR electroluminescence, but the rate is integrated only over a window from -1 to 34 µs relative to S2UV, and the paper notes that about 15% of IR pulses at the nominal field fall outside this window and that this fraction may vary with field. If the slow component is partly instrumental, as the previous comment argues, the observed monotonic rise in Fig. 8 could reflect a field-dependent PMT artifact or field-dependent contamination from the UV/EL light, rather than true IR EL emission. The extraction-efficiency correction does not address this possibility.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.2] The sentence 'This was implemented by stepping down the supply voltage using a Zener diode in series with a potentiometer' could be clarified by stating whether the potentiometer adjusts the bias directly and how the -4.75 V value was calibrated.
  2. [Section 2.1] The liquid level is given as (4.1 ± 0.5) mm above the gate, while the nominal level in typical HeXe operation is 2.5 mm. The paper should state explicitly whether this difference affects the extraction field or the drift time, or refer to the detailed field simulation for this run.
  3. [Section 3] The description of the timing filter amplifier and how its shaping affects the IR pulse time and integrated area is missing; since the IR time response is a central result, the expected distortion from the shaping should be quantified or at least discussed.
  4. [Figure 5] The inset shows a 'PMT dark count background' line, but it is not clear how the dark-count rate was measured at the operating temperature and bias; a brief explanation would help.
  5. [References] The reference list contains a private communication (Pollmann 2025) and a dataset entry for COMSOL; these would be more standard as footnotes or in a dedicated acknowledgments/software section.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper reports an experimental measurement with no derivation whose conclusion is built into its inputs.

full rationale

This paper is an experimental measurement report rather than a derivation or predictive calculation. The central claims—coincident IR signals associated with S1UV and S2UV, a dominant ~30 µs time component, and an increasing IR rate with electric field—are obtained directly from recorded waveforms and fits to those data. The IR-sensitive PMT response is not a fitted parameter used to predict itself; the observed coincidences and field dependence are independent of any assumed IR emission model. Prior work by the same group (Piotter et al. 2023; Hammann et al. 2024) is cited only for comparison of decay timescales, such as the few-ns and ~1.7 µs components, and does not provide the load-bearing premise for the new observation. The paper explicitly acknowledges unresolved systematic ambiguities: the PMT is sensitive to wavelengths as short as 300 nm, it was operated below its design photocathode bias, and the authors cannot rule out contributions from third-continuum emission, neutral bremsstrahlung, material fluorescence, delayed photoelectron extraction, or PMT-related effects. These are honesty caveats about potential contamination, not circular reasoning. The conclusions are presented as consistent with prior measurements and as supported by the observed coincidences and field dependence; nothing in the argument defines the result in terms of itself or fits a parameter and then calls the fit a prediction. Therefore, no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on PMT response assumptions, extraction-efficiency literature, and field simulations. No free parameters are introduced; the decay constants are descriptive fit results, and no new entities are postulated.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The PMT spectral response and quantum efficiency curves from the Hamamatsu datasheet are correct.
    Section 2.2 and Figure 2 use the nominal quantum efficiency at 1.3 microns to identify the PMT as IR-sensitive; however, the actual bias was lower than designed, so the assumed response may not hold.
  • domain assumption Electron extraction efficiency corrections from Aprile et al. (2014) and Xu et al. (2019) apply to this TPC.
    Section 4.2 corrects the observed IR rate for field-dependent electron extraction efficiency using literature values, assuming the same efficiency behaviour in HeXe.
  • domain assumption COMSOL multiphysics simulations accurately determine the electric fields and their uncertainties.
    Section 3 states that field values and uncertainties are determined and verified through COMSOL simulations; the field-dependence analysis relies on these simulated values.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Operation of a dual-phase xenon detector with wavelength sensitivity from ultraviolet to infrared." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YL3AQTRI

@misc{pith2026250524682,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Operation of a dual-phase xenon detector with wavelength sensitivity from ultraviolet to infrared},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YL3AQTRI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.24682}
}
abstract

Xenon, in both its gaseous and liquid phase, offers excellent scintillation and ionization properties, making it an ideal target medium for rare event searches. We report on measurements performed with a dual-phase xenon time projection chamber sensitive to wavelengths from 170 nm to 1700 nm. In addition to the well-established ultraviolet (UV) scintillation, we observe coincident signals in a photomultiplier tube sensitive to infrared (IR) light, associated with both prompt scintillation in the liquid and electroluminescence in the gas. We study the time response of the IR signals and their dependence on the applied amplification field in the gas. Our findings support the observation of IR emission from electroluminescence and reveal a time response distinct from that previously reported for $\alpha$-particles in gas. The results suggest that IR scintillation could provide enhanced signal identification and background rejection in future xenon-based detectors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.24682 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematics of the HeXe TPC with the IR-sensitive PMT at the top (aperture opening at the center) and the UV-sensitive PMT at the bottom. The cathode (bottom), gate, and anode (top) electrodes are visible. The 5 cm-high cylindrical TPC is enclosed by a wall made of PTFE. During operation, the liquid xenon level is maintained between the gate and anode. The drift field is kept constant for all measurements at about 40… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Nominal quantum efficiencies of the PMTs used in this setup: R5509-73 (IR-sensitive, solid black) and R6041-406 (UV-sensitive, dashed black), shown alongside the emission spectra of gaseous xenon at about atmospheric pressure. The UV emission from the second continuum is shown in purple (Koehler et al. (1974)), the third continuum emission is shown in blue (Millet et al. (1978)), and the IR emission in red (Borghesa… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Distribution of 222Rn, 218Po and 214Po events in S1UV-S2UV area space after all cuts are applied. are selected by requiring exactly one S1UV and rejecting events with a secondary physical S2UV following the primary. To reject muon events and signals with distorted pulse shapes, we apply a cut on the S2UV width and shape. Finally, α-particle events are selected in the S1UV-S2UV parameter space, as shown in fig. 3. Th… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Time distribution of IR signals relative to the S1UV time, with the TPC operated at a drift field of 400 V/cm. The inset zooms into the region highlighted by the gray vertical band. Fit results for the fast (green) and slow (purple) components are overlaid. Fits were p…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Average S2UV pulse shape (black) overlaid with the background-subtracted best-fit IR time response following the S2UV from fig. 6 (red curve). For reference, a normal distribution with σ = 0.2 µs is shown (blue dashed). To count IR photons associated with the electrolu…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

18 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    S., Musalhi, A

    Aalbers, J., Akerib, D. S., Musalhi, A. K. A., Alder, F., Amarasinghe, C. S., Ames, A., et al. (2025). Dark matter search results from 4.2 tonne-years of exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment. Physical Review Letters

    work page 2025

  2. [47]

    S., Amedo, P., Saa-Hern´andez, A., Gonz´alez- D´ıaz, D., Santorelli, R., et al

    doi:10.1016/0029-554X(76) 90824-7 Leardini, S., Garc´ıa, E. S., Amedo, P., Saa-Hern´andez, A., Gonz´alez- D´ıaz, D., Santorelli, R., et al. (2022). Time and band-resolved scintillation in time projection chambers based on gaseous xenon. Eur . Phys. J. C82,

    work page doi:10.1016/0029-554x(76 2022

  3. [60]

    doi:10.1007/s11433-017-9028-0 Cichon, D. (2021). Liquid xenon detector physics with XENON1T and HeXe: electric noise stability, background discrimination studies and measurements of the scintillation pulse shape . Ph.D. thesis, Ruprecht- Karls-Universit¨at Heidelberg Cichon, D., Eurin, G., J¨org, F., Marrod´an Undagoitia, T., and Rupp, N. (2022). Scintill...

    doi:10.1007/s11433-017-9028-0 2021

  4. [79]

    doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7152-2 Bakale, G., Sowada, U., and Schmidt, W. F. (1976). Effect of an electric field on electron attachment to sulfur hexafluoride, nitrous oxide, and molecular oxygen in liquid argon and xenon. The Journal of Physical Chemistry 80, 2556–2559. doi:10.1021/j100564a006 Belogurov, S., Bressi, G., Carugno, G., Conti, E., Iannuzzi,...

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7152-2 1976

  5. [85]

    doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14442-0 Bressi, G., Carugno, G., Conti, E., Iannuzzi, D., and Meneguzzo, A. (2000). Infrared scintillation in liquid Ar and Xe. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A440,

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14442-0 2000

  6. [92]

    436349 Mulliken, R

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/1. 436349 Mulliken, R. S. (1970). Potential Curves of Diatomic Rare-Gas Molecules and Their Ions, with Particular Reference to Xe

    doi:10.1063/1 1970

  7. [135]

    I., Arazi, L., Arnquist, I

    doi:10.1103/4dyc-z8zf Adams, C., Almaz ´an, H., ´Alvarez, V., Aranburu, A. I., Arazi, L., Arnquist, I. J., et al. (2025). The NEXT-100 Detector. arXiv:2505.17848 Aprile, E., Aalbers, J., Abe, K., Maouloud, S. A., Althueser, L., Andrieu, B., et al. (2025). WIMP Dark Matter Search using a 3.1 tonne × year Exposure of the XENONnT Experiment.arXiv:2502.18005 ...

    arXiv 2025

  8. [167]

    doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(00)00358-2 Bondar, A., Buzulutskov, A., Dolgov, A., Grebenuk, A., Shemyakina, E., and Sokolov, A. (2012). Study of infrared scintillations in gaseous and liquid argon. part i: methodology and time measurements. Journal of Instrumentation 7, P06015–P06015. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/ 7/06/p06015 Borghesani, A. F., Bressi,...

    work page doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(00)00358-2 2012

Show all 18 references
  1. [254]

    doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(99)01021-9 Bressi, G., Carugno, G., Conti, E., Noce, C., and Iannuzzi, D. (2001). Infrared scintillation: a comparison between gaseous and liquid xenon. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 461,

    2001 doi

  2. [361]

    A., Ferderber, L

    doi:10.1140/ epjc/s10052-022-10259-3 Koehler, H. A., Ferderber, L. J., Redhead, D. L., and Ebert, P. J. (1974). Vacuum-ultraviolet emission from high-pressure xenon and argon excited by high-current relativistic electron beams.Phys. Rev. A 9, 768–781. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.9.76...

    1974 doi

  3. [378]

    8th Pisa Meeting on Advanced Detectors Buzulutskov, A., Bondar, A., and Grebenuk, A

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0168-9002(00)01249-3. 8th Pisa Meeting on Advanced Detectors Buzulutskov, A., Bondar, A., and Grebenuk, A. (2011). Infrared scintillation yield in gaseous and liquid argon. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 94, 52001. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/94/52001 Carugn...

    2011 doi

  4. [425]

    and Solin, O

    doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10385-y Lindblom, P. and Solin, O. (1988). Atomic near-infrared noble gas scintillations i. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 268, 204–208. doi:10.1016/0168...

    1988 doi

  5. [482]

    doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11618-4 [Dataset] Pollmann, T. (2025). private communication Shaw, P.-S., Li, Z., Arp, U., and Lykke, K. R. (2007). Ultraviolet characterization of integrating spheres. Appl. Opt. 46, 5119–5128. doi:10.1364/AO.46.005119 Sorensen, P. and Gibbons, R. ...

    2025 arXiv

  6. [617]

    doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(98)00840-7 Chen, X., Fu, C., Galan, J., Giboni, K., Giuliani, F., Gu, L., et al. (2017). PandaX-III: Searching for neutrinoless double beta decay with high pressure 136Xe gas time projection chambers. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy

    2017 doi

  7. [2025]

    3389/fdest.2025.1580297 Borghesani, A

    doi:10. 3389/fdest.2025.1580297 Borghesani, A. F., Carugno, G., and Mogentale, I. (2007a). Infrared emission spectrum and potentials of 0 + u and 0 + g states of Xe 2 excimers produced by electron impact. J. Phys. B 40,

    2007

  8. [4551]

    1088/0953-4075/40/24/001 Borghesani, A

    doi:10. 1088/0953-4075/40/24/001 Borghesani, A. F., Carugno, G., and Mogentale, I. (2007b). Low- and high-density features of ir luminescence of xe2 excimers produced by electron impact. Physica Scripta 76, C84. doi:10.1088/0031-8949/ 76/3/N13 Bouet, R., Busto, J., Cadiou, A.,...

    2007 doi

  9. [5170]

    doi:10.1063/1.1672756 Piotter, M., Cichon, D., Hammann, R., J ¨org, F., H ¨otzsch, L., and Marrod´an Undagoitia, T. (2023). First time-resolved measurement of infrared scintillation light in gaseous xenon. Eur. Phys. J. C 83,

    2023 doi

  10. [6042]

    F., Carugno, G., and Chiossi, F

    doi:10.1063/1.1398307 Borghesani, A. F., Carugno, G., and Chiossi, F. (2025). Near-infrared cathodoluminescence of xe2 excimers in dense gaseous mixtures. Frontiers in Detector Science and T echnologyVolume 3 -

    2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.