Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 72 references

Strong coupling of chiral light with chiral matter: a macroscopic study

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that a single Lorentz resonance in a chiral medium, placed in a twisted handedness-preserving Fabry-Pérot resonator, produces chiral strong coupling with a Rabi splitting controlled by the match between the medium's and…

desk verdict A useful macroscopic framework for chiral strong coupling in a twisted Fabry-Pérot cavity, but the sign convention for the critical chirality is internally inconsistent and needs cleaning up. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.24800 v1 pith:U2RGJOHE submitted 2025-05-30 physics.optics cond-mat.other

Sergey A. Dyakov , Ilia A. Smagin , Natalia S. Salakhova , Oleg Blokhin , Denis G. Baranov , Ilia M. Fradkin , Nikolay A. Gippius This is my paper
classification physics.opticscond-mat.other PACS 42.50.Pq78.20.Ek
keywords chiralstrongcouplingPasteurparameterhandedness-preservingmirrorFabry-PérotresonatorLorentzmodelRabisplittingenantiomerdiscriminationcirculardichroism
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that a chiral medium placed between two handedness-preserving mirrors can enter the strong-coupling regime with the cavity's chiral light, and that the coupling strength depends on whether the medium's handedness matches the mode's handedness. Using a single-resonance Lorentz model for the medium's permittivity, permeability, and Pasteur chirality parameter, the authors derive a Rabi splitting formula and identify a critical microscopic chirality at which one of the two cavity modes completely decouples while the other couples maximally. If correct, this gives a concrete route to enantiospecific optical response in a simple planar resonator, useful for distinguishing mirror-image molecules.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the chiral Lorentz model: epsilon(omega)=epsilon_inf + f_e $omega0^{2}$/($omega0^{2}$ - $omega^{2}$ - i gamma omega), kappa(omega)=f_me (omega/omega0) $omega0^{2}$/($omega0^{2}$ - $omega^{2}$ - i gamma omega), and the analogous mu(omega), with oscillator strengths expressed through transition dipoles f_e=A|p01|^2, f_me=A Im[p01·m01*], f_m=A|m01|^2 and the phase-locking relation m01 = -i xi p01. The second ingredient is the handedness-preserving Fabry-Pérot cavity built from two twisted anisotropic mirrors satisfying rxx=-ryy, whose Jones-matrix eigenmodes are pure RH/LH circular modes with frequencies omega/c=(-arg r ± 2 $\alpha$ + pi N)/(g($\sqrt$(epsilon mu) ∓ kappa)). The critical relation xi_cr emerges from setting the dipole-field interaction energy p01·E + m01·H = 0 for one helicity. Together these give Eq. (30) for the Rabi splitting and Eq. (27) for the critical decoupling condition.

What would settle it

In the same cavity (twist 2alpha=40°, gap 3450 nm, transition at 1500 nm), fill the gap with a chiral medium tuned to xi = xi_cr and record the transmission spectrum for both enantiomers: the model predicts that the mode with opposite handedness to the medium passes through the pole unshifted with no avoided crossing, while the matching mode shows an avoided crossing with 2pi c/$\Omega$ ≈ 49 nm. Observing an avoided crossing for both modes, or a substantially different splitting, would falsify Eq. (30) and the critical-decoupling picture.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that introducing a Lorentz pole into the macroscopic material parameters epsilon(omega), mu(omega), and kappa(omega) of a chiral Pasteur medium inside a twisted Fabry-Pérot resonator produces chiral strong coupling. The Rabi splitting for an ideal left- or right-handed medium is $\Omega$ = $\sqrt$(4 $omega0^{2}$ A |p01|^2 / epsilon_infinity - $gamma^{2}$), and the critical microscopic chirality at which one handedness fully decouples while the other couples maximally is xi_cr = -$\sqrt$(mu_infinity/epsilon_infinity), which up to sign is the background impedance. At this critical point one of the two cavity modes passes through the material resonance unperturbed, while the other shows the maximum avoided crossing; full-wave Fourier modal method simulations reproduce the predicted spectra, including a Rabi splitting 2pi c/$\Omega$ about 45 nm versus the theoretical 49 nm.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes the chiral medium has a single Lorentz resonance whose electric and magnetic transition dipoles are locked by the relation m01 = -i xi p01 with one real parameter xi; if real molecules have multiple resonances, complex dipole phases, nonlocal response, or sign conventions that differ from this, the critical decoupling condition xi_cr = -sqrt(mu_infinity/epsilon_infinity) and the Rabi formula (30) would not hold as written.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In a cavity tuned to xi=xi_cr, opposite enantiomers of the same molecule produce qualitatively different transmission spectra: one shows a single unshifted resonance, the other a Rabi-split doublet, giving an enantiospecific optical signature.
  • The resonator's chiral modes are tunable by twist angle and gap size, so the resonance condition can be brought to the molecular transition for fixed wavelength and refractive index.
  • The Rabi splitting formula gives a direct design target: given the transition dipole p01 and background permittivity, one can estimate whether a chosen molecule reaches the strong-coupling regime.
  • Because decoupling occurs for opposite signs of xi and mode handedness, the effect selects one enantiomer for maximum coupling and the other for zero coupling, rather than merely different coupling strengths.
  • Using wideband handedness-preserving mirrors maintains high-quality-factor modes across 1400-1800 nm, supporting the strong-coupling regime over a broad spectral window.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, if the critical condition can be engineered for real molecular transitions, the same device could serve as a background-free enantiomer sensor: at xi_cr one enantiomer's polariton is invisible in transmission while the other is strongly split.
  • Beyond the paper, the single-resonance phase-locking assumption will break down for molecules with multiple close transitions or with electric and magnetic dipole phases that vary across the band; extending the model to multiple Lorentz poles should shift xi_cr and modify the Rabi formula.
  • Beyond the paper, the same handedness-preserving geometry could probe the imaginary part of kappa, i.e. circular dichroism near the pole, since the differential transmission maps trace the material's chiral loss as xi increases.
  • Beyond the paper, because xi_cr equals the background impedance, matching the cavity medium's epsilon_infinity and mu_infinity to a molecule's effective dipole ratio could be used to tune which enantiomer decouples.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies strong coupling between chiral light and chiral matter in a Fabry-Pérot resonator formed by two twisted handedness-preserving anisotropic mirrors. The chiral medium is described macroscopically by Lorentz-oscillator forms for the permittivity, permeability, and Pasteur parameter, with oscillator strengths linked to microscopic electric and magnetic transition dipole moments through a single real chirality parameter ξ. The authors derive the eigenmodes of the twisted resonator, identify a critical microscopic chirality at which one helicity fully decouples while the other couples maximally, and provide an approximate formula for the Rabi splitting. They design a wideband handedness-preserving mirror, perform full-wave Fourier modal method simulations, and report a Rabi splitting of about 45 nm, in reasonable agreement with the theoretical value of about 49 nm.

Significance. If the internal sign inconsistency is resolved, the paper offers a useful macroscopic framework for chiral polaritonics. It combines an analytic description of the cavity eigenmodes with a concrete mirror design and full-wave simulations, and it makes a falsifiable prediction: at a critical microscopic chirality, one of the two cavity modes decouples, producing enantio-selective transmission. The agreement between the numerical and analytic Rabi splittings to roughly ten percent is a strong point. The paper also builds on previous chiral-cavity work and extends it to a practical twisted-mirror geometry. The main limitation is the simplified single-resonance, phase-locked dipole model, which is appropriate for a first theory but should be stated more cautiously in the abstract and conclusion.

major comments (2)
  1. [I.A, Eqs. (21)–(22) and (27); Fig. 4 caption] The sign convention connecting the microscopic chirality parameter ξ to the magneto-electric oscillator strength is internally inconsistent. From Eq. (22), m01 = -iξ p01, and Eq. (21), f_me = A Im(p01·m01*), one obtains f_me = Aξ|p01|^2 = ξ f_e (for real ξ). Substituting f_me = +ξ f_e and f_m = ξ^2 f_e into Eqs. (23)–(25) gives the critical condition ξ_cr = +√(μ∞/ε∞), not the value -√(μ∞/ε∞) stated in Eq. (27). The interaction-energy argument leading to Eq. (29) yields U = p01·E[1 - ξΛ/Z], so U=0 for the Λ=-1 mode gives ξ = -Z, in agreement with Eq. (27) only if the dipole relation in Eq. (22) is changed to m01 = +iξ p01 (or if the definition of f_me in Eq. (21) carries an extra minus sign). The Fig. 4 caption in fact uses f_me = -ξ f_e, which is the convention needed for Eq. (27) and for the simulations, but it contradicts Eq. (22). Because the predicted sign of the decoupling enantiomer depends on this choice, the manuscript must adopt a single, clearly stated convention and propagate it through Eqs. (22), (27), (28), and the numerical example.
  2. [I.B, Eq. (30)] The Rabi splitting formula in Eq. (30) is a central quantitative result, but it is presented with no derivation (the text only says 'one can ... obtain'). The expression contains the background permittivity ε∞ in the denominator, and it is not evident from the preceding small-oscillator-strength expansion how this factor arises. Please provide a derivation, including the explicit form of the coupled-mode equation in the vicinity of the material pole and the definitions of the 'ideal LH or RH chiral medium' used. This is needed for the reader to verify the factor 4, the ω0^2 scaling, and the subtraction of γ^2.
minor comments (4)
  1. [I.B, Eq. (28)] Equation (28) as printed appears to lack a division symbol: the right-hand side has the dimensions of κ times √(εμ) (a frequency-dependent quantity), while the left-hand side is a constant of order unity. If the intended expression is κ(ω)/(√(ε(ω)μ(ω))-√(ε∞μ∞)), please correct the typo and provide a derivation, as the current form cannot be an equality.
  2. [I.A, Eq. (2) and Fig. 4 caption] The symbol χ is used for the non-reciprocity parameter in Eq. (2), but in the Fig. 4 caption and elsewhere the Pasteur parameter is denoted χ instead of κ. Please harmonize the notation.
  3. [I.A] The paper does not state its time-harmonic convention (e^{-iωt} vs. e^{+iωt}). This matters for the signs in Eqs. (8), (21), and (22). Please specify the convention.
  4. [Abstract and Conclusion] The single-resonance Lorentz model with phase-locked electric and magnetic dipoles (m01 = -iξ p01) is a strong simplification. The abstract and conclusion present the results as generally applicable to chiral organic molecules; please add a sentence noting that the critical condition and Rabi splitting are derived for this single-resonance model and may require modification for multi-resonance or nonlocal responses.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Lorentz-pole strong-coupling derivation is self-contained, though an internal sign inconsistency between Eq. (22) and the Fig. 4 caption is a correctness caveat rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The cavity eigenmodes are obtained from the Jones-matrix round-trip product (Eqs. 11-19); the chiral Lorentz model (Eq. 20) and the microscopic relation m01=-iξp01 (Eq. 22) are stated as model inputs, not as consequences of the strong-coupling result; the critical magneto-electric oscillator strength (Eq. 24) is obtained algebraically from the small-oscillator expansion (Eq. 23); and the critical microscopic chirality (Eq. 27) is independently supported by the vanishing dipole-field interaction energy U=p01·E+m01·H=0 (Eq. 29), which is not a restatement of Eq. (27). The Rabi splitting (Eq. 30) is a derived expression, and the comparison to the Fourier-modal simulation is a same-model consistency check rather than a fit; no parameter is fitted to the target quantity. Self-citations to Ref. [19] (one co-author) and Ref. [48] (same group) are not load-bearing in a circular way: the Lorentz-form constitutive relations trace to Condon [68], the cavity round-trip matrix is re-derived in the paper, and the m=-iξp relation is an explicitly stated ansatz rather than an unsupported uniqueness claim. The one real caveat is an internal sign inconsistency: combining (21) with (22) gives f_me=+ξf_e, whereas the Fig. 4 caption sets f_me=-ξf_e, which is the convention needed for Eq. (27). This flips which enantiomer is predicted to decouple, but it is a consistency/correctness defect, not an equivalence of the prediction to its inputs, so under the circularity rubric it does not raise the score beyond 2.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced. The handedness-preserving mirror is a designed structure, not a postulated entity. The free parameters are material and cavity parameters chosen for the numerical demonstration; they are not fitted to external data. The key assumptions are the Pasteur constitutive form, the single-resonance Lorentz model, a one-parameter microscopic dipole relation, and the small-oscillator approximation.

free parameters (8)
  • background permittivity epsilon_infinity = 2 (numerical example)
    Chosen for the resonator medium; enters the critical chirality and the Rabi formula through the inverse square root.
  • background permeability mu_infinity = 1 (numerical example)
    Chosen alongside epsilon_infinity; determines the impedance and therefore xi_cr.
  • transition frequency omega_0 = 2*pi*c / 1500 nm
    Position of the chiral Lorentz pole in the numerical example.
  • transition decay rate gamma = omega_0 / 300
    Damping in the Lorentz model; sets the linewidth of the material resonance.
  • electric oscillator strength f_e = set by f_e * omega_0^2 = 500 meV^2
    Overall coupling strength of the material resonance; all other oscillator strengths are scaled from it via xi.
  • microscopic chirality parameter xi = varied from 0 to xi_cr = -sqrt(mu_infinity / epsilon_infinity) ~ -0.707
    Controls the handedness and strength of the chiral medium through f_m = xi^2 f_e and f_me = -xi f_e in the numerical model.
  • cavity gap g = 3450 nm in the main example
    Sets the Fabry-Pérot mode frequencies together with the twist angle.
  • twist angle 2*alpha = 40 degrees for the main spectra; maps cover 0 to 180 degrees
    Controls the splitting between the two chiral cavity modes and the resonance condition.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Local bi-isotropic Pasteur constitutive relations (Eq. 4)
    The paper assumes reciprocal chiral media can be described by D = epsilon E + i kappa H and B = -i kappa E + mu H; all later derivations rest on this form.
  • domain assumption Lorentz-pole response for epsilon, mu, and kappa (Eq. 20)
    The material response is assumed to be a single damped resonance with oscillator strengths connected by Eq. (21); this is the mechanism whose consequences the paper explores.
  • ad hoc to paper Microscopic relation m01 = -i xi p01 (Eq. 22)
    Ties electric and magnetic transition dipoles to one real parameter xi. The sign convention is not reconciled with the Fig. 4 caption, which uses f_me = -xi f_e rather than the sign implied by Eqs. (21)-(22).
  • domain assumption Small-oscillator-strength approximation (Eq. 23)
    Used to linearize the refractive indices and to derive the analytical formulas for critical chirality and Rabi splitting; its validity near the resonance is assumed.
  • domain assumption Ideal handedness-preserving mirror with rxx = -ryy and |r| = 1
    Used to derive the eigenmode condition (Eq. 19); the designed silicon mirror only approximately satisfies these conditions over 1400-1800 nm.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Strong coupling of chiral light with chiral matter: a macroscopic study." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/U2RGJOHE

@misc{pith2026250524800,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Strong coupling of chiral light with chiral matter: a macroscopic study},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/U2RGJOHE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.24800}
}
read the original abstract

Maximizing the interaction between chiral light and chiral matter is pivotal for the advancement of technologies enabling optical detection that distinguishes between different handedness in chiral organic molecules. One strategy involves developing a resonator that sustains photonic modes with non-zero electromagnetic handedness, which interact differently with chiral molecules of opposite enantiomers. When chiral molecules are positioned in resonator hotspots, they can alter the system's characteristics due to their inherent electric and magnetic transition dipole moments. In this study, we explore this interaction by incorporating the Lorentz pole into the macroscopic parameters of the chiral medium: dielectric permittivity, magnetic permeability, and chirality coefficient. The latter, also known as the Pasteur parameter, is a dimensionless macroscopic measure indicating the medium's chirality, interlinking electric and magnetic fields in the constitutive relations. We show that introducing the Lorentz pole into these macroscopic material parameters of the chiral medium results in chiral strong coupling between light and matter, with the strength of coupling determined by both the medium's chirality and the photonic mode's chirality.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.24800 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) The sketch of a chiral Fabry-Pérot res [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) The sketch of a wide-band handedness-preserving mirror consisting of the one-dimensional array of Si stripes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Spectral dependencies of (a) the local field energy density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a,b,e,f,i,j) Wavelength and twist-angle dependencies of the resonator transmission coefficient and (c,g,k) differential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    W. T. B. Kelvin,The molecular tactics of a crystal (Clarendon Press, 1894)

    work page

  2. [2]

    L. A. Nguyen, H. He, and C. Pham-Huy, Chiral drugs: an overview, International journal of biomedical science: IJBS2, 85 (2006)

    work page 2006

  3. [3]

    C. W. Deutsche, D. A. Lightner, R. W. Woody, and A. Moscowitz, Optical activity, Annual Review of Phys- ical Chemistry20, 407 (1969)

    work page 1969

  4. [4]

    V. P. Panov, J. K. Vij, N. M. Shtykov, S. S. Seomun, D. D. Parghi, M. Hird, and J. W. Goodby, Optical rota- tory power, biaxiality, and models of chiral tilted smectic phases, Physical Review E68, 021702 (2003)

    work page 2003

  5. [5]

    V. P. Panov, B. K. McCoy, Z. Q. Liu, J. K. Vij, J. W. Goodby,and C.C.Huang, Investigations ofnanoscalehe- lical pitch in smectic-c∗ α and smectic-c∗ phases of a chiral smectic liquid crystal using differential optical reflectivity measurements, Physical Review E74, 011701 (2006). 11

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    In fact, liquid crystal molecules are often chiral, but con- figurational chirality can greatly surpass constitutional chirality in optical effects when the structural periodic- ity is near the wavelength in use

    work page

  7. [7]

    K.Y.BliokhandF.Nori,Characterizingopticalchirality, Physical Review A83, 021803 (2011)

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    L. D. Barron,Molecular light scattering and optical ac- tivity(Cambridge University Press, 2009)

    work page 2009

Show all 72 references
  1. [9]

    Inoue and V

    Y. Inoue and V. Ramamurthy,Chiral photochemistry (CRC Press, 2004)

    2004

  2. [10]

    W. C. Johnson, Secondary structure of proteins through circular dichroism spectroscopy, Annual Review of Bio- physics and Biophysical Chemistry17, 145 (1988)

    1988

  3. [11]

    Hendry, T

    E. Hendry, T. Carpy, J. Johnston, M. Popland, R. V. Mikhaylovskiy, A. J. Lapthorn, S. M. Kelly, L. D. Bar- ron, N. Gadegaard, and M. Kadodwala, Ultrasensitive detection and characterization of biomolecules using su- perchiral fields, Nature Nanotechnology5, 783 (2010)

    2010

  4. [12]

    Tang and A

    Y. Tang and A. E. Cohen, Enhanced enantioselectivity in excitationofchiralmoleculesbysuperchirallight,Science 332, 333 (2011)

    2011

  5. [13]

    Hodgkinson and Q

    I. Hodgkinson and Q. h. Wu, Inorganic chiral optical ma- terials, Advanced materials13, 889 (2001)

    2001

  6. [14]

    McConnell, A

    O. McConnell, A. Bach, C. Balibar, N. Byrne, Y. Cai, G. Carter, M. Chlenov, L. Di, K. Fan, I. Goljer, Y. He, D. Herold, M. Kagan, E. Kerns, F. Koehn, C. Kraml, V. Marathias, B. Marquez, L. McDonald, L. Nogle, C. Petucci, G. Schlingmann, G. Tawa, M. Tischler, R. T. Williamson, ...

    2007

  7. [15]

    Tang and A

    Y. Tang and A. E. Cohen, Optical chirality and its inter- action with matter, Physical review letters104, 163901 (2010)

    2010

  8. [16]

    Dyakov, V

    S. Dyakov, V. Semenenko, N. Gippius, and S. Tikhodeev, Magnetic field free circularly polarized thermal emission from a chiral metasurface, Physical Review B98, 235416 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Genet, Chiral light–chiral matter interactions: An op- tical force perspective, ACS photonics9, 319 (2022)

    C. Genet, Chiral light–chiral matter interactions: An op- tical force perspective, ACS photonics9, 319 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    I. M. Fradkin, A. A. Demenev, V. D. Kulakovskii, V. N. Antonov, and N. A. Gippius, Plasmonic grating for circu- larly polarized outcoupling of waveguide-enhanced spon- taneous emission, Applied Physics Letters120(2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    D. G. Baranov, C. Schaefer, and M. V. Gorkunov, To- ward molecular chiral polaritons, ACS Photonics10, 2440 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Lodahl, S

    P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, S. Stobbe, A. Rauschenbeu- tel, P. Schneeweiss, J. Volz, H. Pichler, and P. Zoller, Chiral quantum optics, Nature541, 473 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    Shapiro and P

    M. Shapiro and P. Brumer, Coherent control of molecular dynamics, Reports on Progress in Physics66, 859 (2003)

    2003

  14. [22]

    W. Ma, H. Kuang, L. Xu, L. Ding, C. Xu, L. Wang, and N. A. Kotov, Attomolar DNA detection with chiral nanorod assemblies, Nature Communications4, 10.1038/ncomms3689 (2013)

    2013 doi

  15. [23]

    Dyakov, N

    S. Dyakov, N. Gippius, I. Fradkin, and S. Tikhodeev, Vertical routing of spinning-dipole radiation from a chiral metasurface, Physical Review Applied14, 024090 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    D. M. Chambers and G. P. Nordin, Stratified volume diffractive optical elements as high-efficiency gratings, JOSA A16, 1184 (1999)

    1999

  17. [25]

    I. M. Fradkin, A. A. Demenev, A. V. Kovalchuk, V. D. Kulakovskii, V. N. Antonov, S. A. Dyakov, and N. A. Gippius, Nearly perfect routing of chiral light by plasmonic grating on slab waveguide, arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.05865 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    D. G. Baranov, B. Munkhbat, N. O. Laenk, R. Verre, M. Kaell, and T. Shegai, Circular dichroism mode split- tingandboundstoitsenhancementwithcavity-plasmon- polaritons, Nanophotonics9, 283 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Petersen, J

    J. Petersen, J. Volz, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Chiral nanophotonic waveguide interface based on spin-orbit in- teraction of light, Science346, 67 (2014)

    2014

  20. [28]

    Schäfer and D

    C. Schäfer and D. G. Baranov, Chiral polaritonics: Ana- lytical solutions, intuition, and use, The Journal of Phys- ical Chemistry Letters14, 3777 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    R. R. Riso, L. Grazioli, E. Ronca, T. Giovannini, and H. Koch, Strong Coupling in Chiral Cavities: Nonpertur- bative Framework for Enantiomer Discrimination, Phys- ical Review X13, 31002 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Mohammadi, A

    E. Mohammadi, A. Tavakoli, P. Dehkhoda, Y. Jahani, K. L. Tsakmakidis, A. Tittl, and H. Altug, Accessi- ble superchiral near-fields driven by tailored electric and magneticresonancesinall-dielectricnanostructures,ACS Photonics6, 1939 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    X. Wu, L. Xu, L. Liu, W. Ma, H. Yin, H. Kuang, L. Wang, C. Xu, and N. A. Kotov, Unexpected chirality of nanoparticle dimers and ultrasensitive chiroplasmonic bioanalysis, Journal of the American Chemical Society 135, 18629 (2013)

    2013

  24. [32]

    F. Graf, J. Feis, X. Garcia-Santiago, M. Wegener, C. Rockstuhl, and I. Fernandez-Corbaton, Achiral, he- licity preserving, and resonant structures for enhanced sensing of chiral molecules, ACS Photonics6, 482 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    S. A. Dyakov, M. V. Stepikhova, A. A. Bogdanov, A. V. Novikov, D. V. Yurasov, M. V. Shaleev, Z. F. Krasilnik, S. G. Tikhodeev, and N. A. Gippius, Photonic bound states in the continuum in si structures with the self- assembled ge nanoislands, Laser & Photonics Reviews , 2000242 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    Yoo and Q.-H

    S. Yoo and Q.-H. Park, Chiral light-matter interaction in optical resonators, Physical review letters114, 203003 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    Shomroni, S

    I. Shomroni, S. Rosenblum, Y. Lovsky, O. Bechler, G. Guendelman, and B. Dayan, All-optical routing of sin- gle photons by a one-atom switch controlled by a single photon, Science345, 903 (2014)

    2014

  28. [36]

    T. Kan, A. Isozaki, N. Kanda, N. Nemoto, K. Kon- ishi, H. Takahashi, M. Kuwata-Gonokami, K. Mat- sumoto, and I. Shimoyama, Enantiomeric switching of chiral metamaterial for terahertz polarization modula- tion employing vertically deformable MEMS spirals, Na- ture Communication...

    2015 doi

  29. [37]

    Fernandez-Corbaton, C

    I. Fernandez-Corbaton, C. Rockstuhl, P. Ziemke, P. Gumbsch, A. Albiez, R. Schwaiger, T. Fren- zel, M. Kadic, and M. Wegener, New twists of 3d chiral metamaterials, Advanced Materials31, 10.1002/adma.201807742 (2019)

    2019 doi

  30. [38]

    A. Pham, M. Berthel, Q. Jiang, J. Bellessa, S. Huant, C. Genet, and A. Drezet, Chiral optical local density of states in a spiral plasmonic cavity, Physical Review A94, 053850 (2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    J. Wang, J. Zheng, K. H. Li, J. Wang, H.-Q. Lin, and L. Shao, Excitation of chiral cavity plasmon resonances in film-coupled chiral au nanoparticles, Advanced Optical 12 Materials 10.1002/adom.202202865 (2023)

    2023 doi

  32. [40]

    Konishi, M

    K. Konishi, M. Nomura, N. Kumagai, S. Iwamoto, Y. Arakawa, and M. Kuwata-Gonokami, Circularly po- larized light emission from semiconductor planar chi- ral nanostructures, Physical Review Letters106, 057402 (2011)

    2011

  33. [41]

    Barbillon, A

    G. Barbillon, A. Ivanov, and A. K. Sarychev, Applica- tions of symmetry breaking in plasmonics, Symmetry12, 896 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    Shi, Z.-L

    T. Shi, Z.-L. Deng, G. Geng, X. Zeng, Y. Zeng, G. Hu, A. Overvig, J. Li, C.-W. Qiu, A. Alù,et al., Planar chi- ral metasurfaces with maximal and tunable chiroptical response driven by bound states in the continuum, Na- ture Communications13, 4111 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    H. Wang, Z. Qin, L. Huang, Y. Li, R. Zhao, H. Zhou, H. He, J. Zhang, and S. Qu, Metasurface with dynamic chiral meta-atoms for spin multiplexing hologram and low observable reflection, PhotoniX3, 1 (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    Kumar, B

    R. Kumar, B. Trodden, A. Klimash, M. Bousquet, S. K. Chaubey, N. J. Fairbairn, B. A. Russell, K. Wynne, A. S. Karimullah, N. Gadegaard, P. J. Skabara, G. J. Hedley, S. Hashiyada, A. Movsesyan, A. O. Govorov, and M. Kadodwala, Electromagnetic Enantiomer: Chiral Nanophotonic Cav...

    2024

  37. [45]

    J. Feis, D. Beutel, J. Köpfler, X. Garcia-Santiago, C. Rockstuhl, M. Wegener, and I. Fernandez-Corbaton, Helicity-preserving optical cavity modes for enhanced sensing of chiral molecules, Physical review letters124, 033201 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    Hübener, U

    H. Hübener, U. De Giovannini, C. Schäfer, J. Andberger, M. Ruggenthaler, J. Faist, and A. Rubio, Engineering quantum materials with chiral optical cavities, Nature Materials20, 438 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    Plum and N

    E. Plum and N. I. Zheludev, Chiral mirrors, Applied Physics Letters106, 221901 (2015)

    2015

  40. [48]

    S. A. Dyakov, N. S. Salakhova, A. V. Ignatov, I. M. Frad- kin, V. P. Panov, J.-K. Song, and N. A. Gippius, Chiral light in twisted fabry–pérot cavities, Advanced Optical Materials12, 2302502 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    Semnani, J

    B. Semnani, J. Flannery, R. A. Maruf, and M. Bajcsy, Spin-preserving chiral photonic crystal mirror, Light: Science and Applications9, 10.1038/s41377-020-0256-5 (2020)

    2020 doi

  42. [50]

    Z. Li, W. Liu, H. Cheng, D.-Y. Choi, S. Chen, and J. Tian, Spin-selective full-dimensional manipulation of optical waves with chiral mirror, Advanced Materials32, 1907983 (2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    M. Liu, E. Plum, H. Li, S. Duan, S. Li, Q. Xu, X. Zhang, C. Zhang, C. Zou, B. Jin, J. Han, and W. Zhang, Switchable chiral mirrors, Advanced Optical Materials 8, 10.1002/adom.202000247 (2020)

    2020 doi

  44. [52]

    M. V. Gorkunov, A. A. Antonov, V. R. Tuz, A. S. Kupri- ianov, and Y. S. Kivshar, Bound states in the continuum underpin near-lossless maximum chirality in dielectric metasurfaces, Advanced Optical Materials9, 2100797 (2021)

    2021

  45. [53]

    Voronin, A

    K. Voronin, A. S. Taradin, M. V. Gorkunov, and D. G. Baranov, Single-handedness chiral optical cavities, ACS Photonics9, 2652 (2022)

    2022

  46. [54]

    S. Sun, B. Gu, and S. Mukamel, Polariton ring currents and circular dichroism of mg-porphyrin in a chiral cavity, Chemical Science13, 1037 (2022)

    2022

  47. [55]

    Gautier, M

    J. Gautier, M. Li, T. W. Ebbesen, and C. Genet, Planar chirality and optical spin–orbit coupling for chiral fabry– perot cavities, ACS photonics9, 778 (2022)

    2022

  48. [56]

    Mauro, J

    L. Mauro, J. Fregoni, J. Feist, and R. Avriller, Chiral discrimination in helicity-preserving fabry-pérot cavities, Physical Review A107, L021501 (2023)

    2023

  49. [57]

    Schaeferling, D

    M. Schaeferling, D. Dregely, M. Hentschel, and H. Giessen, Tailoring enhanced optical chirality: design principles for chiral plasmonic nanostructures, Physical Review X2, 031010 (2012)

    2012

  50. [58]

    Schaeferling, X

    M. Schaeferling, X. Yin, N. Engheta, and H. Giessen, Helical plasmonic nanostructures as prototypical chiral near-field sources, Acs Photonics1, 530 (2014)

    2014

  51. [59]

    N. Liu, H. Liu, S. Zhu, and H. Giessen, Stereometama- terials, Nature Photonics3, 157 (2009)

    2009

  52. [60]

    Kuzyk, R

    A. Kuzyk, R. Schreiber, Z. Fan, G. Pardatscher, E.-M. Roller, A. Högele, F. C. Simmel, A. O. Govorov, and T. Liedl, Dna-based self-assembly of chiral plasmonic nanostructures with tailored optical response, Nature 483, 311 (2012)

    2012

  53. [61]

    Ávalos-Ovando, E

    O. Ávalos-Ovando, E. Y. Santiago, A. Movsesyan, X.- T. Kong, P. Yu, L. V. Besteiro, L. K. Khorashad, H. Okamoto, J. M. Slocik, M. A. Correa-Duarte,et al., Chiral bioinspired plasmonics: a paradigm shift for opti- cal activity and photochemistry, ACS photonics9, 2219 (2022)

    2022

  54. [62]

    F. I. Fedorov,Theory of gyrotropy(Nauka i Tekhnika,

  55. [63]

    Fyodorov, Teoriya girotropii (1976)

    F. Fyodorov, Teoriya girotropii (1976)

    1976

  56. [64]

    Lindell, A

    I. Lindell, A. Sihvola, S. Tretyakov, and A. J. Viitanen, Electromagnetic waves in chiral and bi-isotropic media (Artech House, 1994)

    1994

  57. [65]

    Simovski,Composite Media with Weak Spatial Disper- sion(Jenny Stanford Publishing, 2018)

    C. Simovski,Composite Media with Weak Spatial Disper- sion(Jenny Stanford Publishing, 2018)

    2018

  58. [66]

    Fernandez-Corbaton, M

    I. Fernandez-Corbaton, M. Fruhnert, and C. Rockstuhl, Objects of maximum electromagnetic chirality, Physical Review X6, 031013 (2016)

    2016

  59. [67]

    Menzel, C

    C. Menzel, C. Rockstuhl, and F. Lederer, Advanced jones calculus for the classification of periodic metamaterials, Physical Review A82, 053811 (2010)

    2010

  60. [68]

    E. U. Condon, Theories of optical rotatory power, Re- views of Modern Physics9, 432 (1937)

    1937

  61. [69]

    T. Z. Seidov and M. A. Gorlach, Unbounded tellegen re- sponse in media with multiple resonances, Physical Re- view A111, 033521 (2025)

    2025

  62. [70]

    Equality √εµ=κcan be considered as a critical condi- tion for the medium beyond which the properties of the medium is drastically change

  63. [71]

    N. S. Salakhova, I. M. Fradkin, S. A. Dyakov, and N. A. Gippius, Fourier modal method for moiré lattices, Phys- ical Review B104, 085424 (2021)

    2021

  64. [72]

    Smagin, S

    I. Smagin, S. Dyakov, and N. Gippius, Generalization of the fourier modal method to gratings with bi-anisotropic materials, To be published

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.