Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 43 references

The vector-valued Allen-Cahn equation with potentials of high-dimensional double-wells under Robin boundary conditions

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For vector-valued Allen-Cahn with boundary contact energy, well-prepared initial data yield convergence to mean curvature flow with fixed contact angle, at rates $\epsilon$ in relative entropy and $\epsilon^{1/2}$ in phase-field error…

desk verdict Genuine new theorem for vector-valued Allen-Cahn under Robin boundary conditions, but the proof of the central L1 rate has a sign error in the relative-entropy functional B; fixable and otherwise sound. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.00392 v1 pith:GBMACKGX submitted 2025-05-31 math.AP

Xingyu Wang This is my paper
classification math.AP MSC 35B2535K5553E1058E20
keywords vector-valuedAllen-CahnRobinboundaryconditionsmeancurvatureflowcontactanglerelativeentropyharmonicheatminimalpairconditionhigh-dimensionaldouble-wellpotentials
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that, for a vector-valued Allen-Cahn equation with a high-dimensional double-well potential and nonlinear Robin boundary conditions, well-prepared initial data produce solutions whose diffuse interface converges to a sharp mean curvature flow meeting the boundary at a fixed contact angle $0<\alpha\le 90^\circ$. The convergence is quantitative: the relative entropy stays of order $\epsilon$ and the phase-field error $\int_\Omega |d_F(u_\epsilon)-c_F\chi_{\Omega^+_t}|\,dx$ decays like $\epsilon^{1/2}$, uniformly on a time interval $[0,T]$. In the limit, the two phase fields take values in the well manifolds $N_\pm$ in the bulk, evolve by harmonic heat flow into those manifolds, and on the interface satisfy the minimal pair condition $|u_+-u_-|=\mathrm{dist}_N$. A sympathetic reader should care because this combines the interior vector-valued high-well setting with boundary contact energy and a general fixed contact angle, which is the natural regime for wetting and multi-component phase transitions.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the relative entropy functionals $E_\epsilon[u_\epsilon|\Gamma]$ and $B_\epsilon[u_\epsilon|\Gamma]$, built from the quasi-distance $d_F$ (a phase-field potential that is $0$ on $N_-$ and $c_F$ on $N_+$), together with a boundary-adapted gradient flow calibration triple $(\xi,H,\vartheta)$ supplied by Lemma 2.9. The calibration provides an extension of the interface normal, velocity, and signed distance with error estimates near the interface and boundary conditions $\xi\cdot n_{\partial\Omega}=\cos\alpha$, $H\cdot n_{\partial\Omega}=0$; these enter the relative entropy inequality (3.12), whose Gronwall argument yields the $\epsilon$ and $\epsilon^{1/2}$ rates. To upgrade the weak limits $u_\pm$ so that they are well-defined on the interface, the proof uses $SBV$ compactness and a geometric inequality comparing $|\nabla u|$ with the gradient of its nearest-point projection onto the well manifolds, and a contradiction argument with Lemma 4.8 forces the minimal pair condition.

What would settle it

Pick a smooth two-dimensional domain and a boundary energy for which planar mean curvature flow with contact angle $\alpha\in(0,90^\circ]$ develops a singularity or pinch before time $T$, and check whether any triple $(\xi,H,\vartheta)$ can satisfy (2.41a)-(2.42f) up to that time; failure of the calibration would make the relative entropy inequality (3.12) impossible and would falsify Theorem 1.1 for that configuration. Alternatively, simulate the vector-valued Allen-Cahn equation (1.3) with a simple double-well pair such as two spheres in $\mathbb{R}^3$ and measure $\int_\Omega |d_F(u_\epsilon)-c_F\chi_{\Omega^+_t}|\,dx$; a decay rate strictly slower than $\epsilon^{1/2}$ would contradict (1.18c).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 1.1 is the central assertion: for any strong mean-curvature-flow solution on a smooth two-dimensional domain with fixed contact angle, and for initial data satisfying (1.17), the unique weak solution satisfies $\sup_t E_\epsilon[u_\epsilon|\Gamma](t)\le C_1\epsilon$, $\sup_t B_\epsilon[u_\epsilon|\Gamma](t)\le C_1\epsilon$, and $\sup_t\int_\Omega|d_F(u_\epsilon)-c_F\chi_{\Omega^+_t}|\,dx\le C_1\epsilon^{1/2}$. Theorem 1.2 then identifies the limits $u_\pm$ as solutions of harmonic heat flow into $N_\pm$ in the bulk, and shows the minimal pair condition holds $\mathcal{H}^1$-a.e. on the interface. The paper thereby establishes the sharp-interface limit and the limiting system for the vector-valued Allen-Cahn equation with Robin boundary conditions, for contact angles up to and including $90^\circ$.

Load-bearing premise

The proof relies on Lemma 2.9, imported from reference [19], which asserts the existence of a strong planar mean curvature flow with contact angle together with a calibration triple satisfying estimates (2.41a)-(2.42f); the paper does not prove this lemma, and if such a calibration cannot be constructed for a given domain, interface, or boundary energy, the relative entropy inequality (3.12) and the convergence conclusions do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If Theorem 1.1 is correct, the diffuse interface of the vector-valued Allen-Cahn equation with Robin boundary conditions converges, locally in time, to sharp mean curvature flow with fixed contact angle, with an explicit $O(\epsilon^{1/2})$ bound on the bulk phase error.
  • The limiting phases $u_\pm$ take values in the manifolds $N_\pm$ and solve harmonic heat flow in the bulk, so the dynamics away from the interface are governed by the geometry of the well manifolds.
  • The minimal pair condition $|u_+-u_-|=\mathrm{dist}_N$ holds on the interface, which selects admissible phase-boundary values in the vector-valued case.
  • The result covers the full range of contact angles $0<\alpha\le 90^\circ$ and a broad class of boundary energy densities satisfying $\sigma\ge d_F\cos\alpha$ and Young's law, including the homogeneous Neumann case $\alpha=90^\circ$.
  • These conclusions generalize the scalar boundary-contact result and the interior vector-valued result to the combined vector-valued-with-boundary setting, and the same strategy applies to any calibration triple supplied by Lemma 2.9.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next test is whether the $O(\epsilon^{1/2})$ phase-error bound is sharp; the slicing argument used to derive it suggests it is a width effect, so numerical experiments should compare against $C\epsilon^{1/2}$ rather than expect a better exponent generically.
  • The calibration assumption of Lemma 2.9 is the true bottleneck for higher dimensions; constructing such triples in $\mathbb{R}^3$ would extend Theorem 1.1 verbatim, and failure examples would identify exactly where the relative entropy machinery breaks.
  • The boundary coercivity condition $\sigma(u)\ge d_F(u)\cos\alpha$ is likely essential for the relative-entropy coercivity estimates; relaxing it would require a different control on the boundary term in (3.10a).
  • The minimal pair condition could be probed numerically by examining whether interfaces select a particular pair $(u_+,u_-)$ in the well manifolds as $\epsilon\to 0$, independently of the boundary energy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the vector-valued Allen-Cahn equation with a double-well potential vanishing on two compact submanifolds N± ⊂ R^k, subject to Robin boundary conditions with a boundary energy density σ. The main results assert that, for well-prepared initial data satisfying (1.17), the relative entropy E_ε[u_ε|Γ] and the auxiliary functional B_ε[u_ε|Γ] grow at most O(ε), yielding an O(ε^{1/2}) L1-convergence rate of d_F(u_ε) to c_F χ_{Ω+_t} (Theorem 1.1); subsequential limits then solve harmonic heat flow into N± in the bulk and satisfy the minimal pair condition on the interface (Theorem 1.2). The proof combines the relative entropy method with boundary-adapted gradient flow calibrations from Hensel and Moser, and uses SBV regularity and geometric measure theory to treat boundary terms.

Significance. If the results are correct, the paper makes a valuable contribution by extending the vector-valued Allen-Cahn sharp-interface theory to domains with boundary contact energy, generalizing both the vector-valued interior result of Liu and the scalar-valued Robin result of Hensel and Moser. The technical machinery is appropriate: relative entropy estimates, gradient flow calibrations, and SBV compactness are used in a coherent way, and the paper is explicit about the two-dimensional restriction stemming from the calibration lemma. The construction of well-prepared initial data in Appendix B is also a useful and nontrivial part of the contribution. The main caveat is that the proof of the central convergence rate has a sign inconsistency in the auxiliary functional B, as detailed below.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.1, Eq. (3.3); §3.2, Corollary 3.5] The functional B is defined in (3.3) with a sign convention that makes it identically non-positive for every admissible u_ε. Indeed, by (2.42a)-(2.42b), ϑ<0 in the interior of Ω+_t and ϑ>0 outside Ω+_t, while ψ_ε=d_F(u_ε) takes values in [0,c_F]; hence (c_F χ_{Ω+_t}−ψ_ε)ϑ ≤ 0 pointwise in all of Ω. Therefore sup_t B_ε≤C_1 ε in (3.35a) is vacuous and cannot be used to control the quantity ∫|ψ_ε−c_F χ_{Ω+_t}||ϑ| dx, which equals −B_ε. The Gronwall argument in Step 1 bounds d/dt B_ε above by Cε+CB_ε, which only gives an upper bound on a non-positive quantity and does not prevent B_ε from becoming very negative. Consequently, (3.35b) and hence the L1 rate (1.18c) do not follow from the written estimates. The argument is recoverable by defining B with the opposite sign, i.e. B_ε := ∫(ψ_ε−c_F χ_{Ω+_t})ϑ dx, or equivalently by estimating −B_ε throughout; with that change the same estimates yield sup |B_ε|≤C_1 ε. As written, however, this is a load-bearing gap in the proof of Theorem 1.1.
  2. [§3.2, Corollary 3.5, Step 2] The slicing inequality asserted in (3.47)-(3.48) is not valid for arbitrary g ∈ L∞, as stated. For example, taking g to be the indicator function of a thin tube of width w and length L around a curve gives (∫|g|)^2 of order L^2w^2 while ∫|g||ϑ| is of order Lw^2, so the ratio is of order L and can be made arbitrarily large by choosing a sufficiently long, thin support, even with |g| bounded. The proof of the claim uses only the boundedness of g and the geometric decomposition, so it does not justify the step from (3.35a) to (3.35b). If the inequality is only intended for g with special structure, such as the diffuse-interface profile ψ_ε−c_F χ_{Ω+_t} whose support has width controlled by ε, that structure must be stated and exploited explicitly.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Appendix A] Lemma 2.6 is foundational for the paper, but Appendix A provides only an outline and refers to [19, Appendix A] for the full argument. Since the paper relies on this lemma for existence, uniqueness, L∞-bounds, regularity, and the energy dissipation identity, please either include a complete proof or state precisely which statements in [19, Appendix A] apply verbatim to the current setting.
  2. [§1.4] In the Notations section, the phrase "symmetric differccne" should read "symmetric difference".
  3. [§2.1, Lemma 2.1] In equation (2.3), the density computation implicitly uses that E∪F agrees with Ω up to measure zero in the limit; since this is a standard fact for complementary sets in a bounded domain, a short clarifying sentence would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's central convergence result is conditional on an externally supplied calibration triple and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the sense required by the circularity check: every load-bearing input is either an explicit hypothesis of the theorems or a cited external result, and none of those inputs contains the conclusion being proved. Theorem 1.1 assumes as an hypothesis that a strong solution to mean curvature flow with fixed contact angle, together with a boundary-adapted gradient flow calibration triple, exists (Lemma 2.9, quoted from Hensel and Moser [19]). The calibration estimates (2.41a)-(2.42f) involve only the moving interface, the domain, and the contact angle; they do not involve the Allen-Cahn solution u_epsilon, the relative entropy functionals, or the final bounds (1.18). Thus the inequality d/dt E_epsilon[u_epsilon|Gamma] + nonnegative terms <= C E_epsilon (Proposition 3.3) is not a restatement of the desired estimate: the rate epsilon^{1/2} in (1.18c) is obtained by Gronwall's inequality from the smallness of the well-prepared initial data, not by construction. Appendix B constructs initial data satisfying the small relative entropy condition (1.17), which is an admissible input rather than a fitted prediction of the output. The citations to Liu [32] and Hensel-Moser [19] are to prior work by other authors, so there is no self-citation chain, and the quoted lemmas are independent mathematical results with stated assumptions that do not include the target convergence. The reviewer-flagged sign issue in the definition of B_epsilon in (3.3) is a potential correctness defect in the written proof, not a circularity: a wrong sign in a relative entropy functional does not make the theorem equivalent to its assumptions. Likewise, the restriction to two dimensions because of Lemma 2.9 (Remark 1.3(3)) is a stated limitation, not circular reasoning. Overall, the paper proves a conditional convergence theorem by comparing the Allen-Cahn flow to an independently given sharp interface evolution; no step of the derivation reduces by definition or by self-citation to the claim being proved.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a chain of standard analytic results and, crucially, on the calibration triple imported from [19]. No free parameters are fitted to data, and no new physical entities are postulated.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Existence of a strong solution to planar MCF with fixed contact angle and the boundary-adapted gradient flow calibration (Lemma 2.9, imported from [19])
    Assumed without proof; it provides the calibration triple (xi, H, theta) and is essential for the relative entropy estimate (3.12).
  • domain assumption Assumptions (1.9)-(1.15) on the potential F and boundary energy density sigma
    The theorems are conditional on these hypotheses; (1.15b) gives coercivity of the relative entropy and Young's law.
  • domain assumption Existence and regularity of weak solutions to (1.3) under these assumptions (Lemma 2.6)
    The proof is only outlined in Appendix A and references [19, Appendix A].
  • standard math Standard geometric measure theory results: SBV compactness (Lemma 2.3), generalized Gauss-Green formula (Lemma 2.4), co-area formula
    Used in Section 4.2 to upgrade regularity of the limits u_+-.
  • standard math Partial regularity and energy estimates for harmonic heat flow (Lemmas 4.9-4.11, imported from Chen-Struwe [8] and [29])
    Used in Section 4.4 to show u_+- solves harmonic heat flow.
  • domain assumption Existence of well-prepared initial data satisfying (1.17), constructed in Appendix B
    Theorem 1.1 applies only to such initial data; the construction uses an optimal profile alpha and a tubular neighborhood of the initial interface.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The vector-valued Allen-Cahn equation with potentials of high-dimensional double-wells under Robin boundary conditions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GBMACKGX

@misc{pith2026250600392,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The vector-valued Allen-Cahn equation with potentials of high-dimensional double-wells under Robin boundary conditions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GBMACKGX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.00392}
}
abstract

This work investigates the vector-valued Allen-Cahn equation with potentials of high-dimensional double-wells under Robin boundary conditions. We establish local-in-time convergence of solutions to mean curvature flow with a fixed contact angle $0<\alpha\leq 90^\circ$, for a broad class of boundary energy densities and well-prepared initial data. The limiting sharp-interface system is derived, comprising harmonic heat flows in the bulk and minimal pair conditions at phase boundaries. The analysis combines the relative entropy method with gradient flow calibrations and weak convergence techniques. These results extend prior works on the analysis of the vector-valued case without boundary effects (Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 78:1199-1247, 2025) and the scalar-valued case with boundary contact energy (Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ., 61:201, 2022).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.00392 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The interface Γt meets ∂Ω at angle α. Γt α α ∂Ω For the case α = 90◦ , corresponding to homogeneous Neumann conditions, Chen [7] established the global-in-time convergence of solutions to sharp-interface limit, utilizing comparison principles and the notion of viscosity solutions. More recently, Ables and Moser [1] obtained the local-in-time convergence via the matched asymp￾totic expansion approach of De Mottoni an… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. For example, N + is a two-dimensional sphere and N − is a one-dimensional circle in R 3 . N + N − BRN distN Next, we specify assumptions on the potential F and boundary energy density σ. Potential F. The smooth double-well potential F : R k → [0, ∞) vanishes exactly on N and satisfies: (1) Local behavior near N. F(u) depends only on dN (u) near N. Specifically, there exist R1 > RN and a smooth function f : [0, ∞) → … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [19]

    Hensel and M

    S. Hensel and M. Moser. Convergence rates for the Allen-Cahn equation with boundary contact energy: the non-perturbative regime . In: Calc. Var. Partial Diff. Equ. 61 (2022), p. 201

    work page 2022

  2. [1]

    Abels and M

    H. Abels and M. Moser. Convergence of the Allen-Cahn equation to the mean curvature flow with 90-contact angle in 2D . In: Interfaces Free Bound. 21 (2019), pp. 313–365

    work page 2019

  3. [2]

    Abels and M

    H. Abels and M. Moser. Convergence of the Allen-Cahn Equation with a Nonlinear Robin Boundary Condition to Mean Curvature Flow with Contact Angle Close to 90 °. In: SIAM J. Math. Anal. 54 (2022), pp. 114–172

    work page 2022

  4. [3]

    Ambrosio

    L. Ambrosio. A new proof of the SBV compactness theorem . In: Calc. Var. Partial Diff. Equ. 3 (1995), pp. 127–137

    work page 1995

  5. [4]

    Ambrosio and G

    L. Ambrosio and G. Dal Maso. A general chain rule for distributional deriva- tives. In: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 108 (1990), pp. 691–702

    work page 1990

  6. [5]

    Ambrosio, N

    L. Ambrosio, N. Fusco, and D. Pallara. Functions of bounded variation and free discontinuity problems. Oxford university press, 2000

    work page 2000

  7. [6]

    J. W. Cahn. Critical point wetting . In: J. Chem. Phys. 66 (1977), pp. 3667– 3672

    work page 1977

  8. [7]

    X. Chen. Generation and propagation of interfaces for reaction-diffusion equa- tions. In: J. Diff. Equ. 96 (1992), pp. 116–141

    work page 1992

Show all 43 references
  1. [8]

    Chen and M

    Y. Chen and M. Struwe. Existence and partial regularity results for the heat flow for harmonic maps . In: Math. Z. 201 (1989), pp. 83–103

    1989

  2. [9]

    De Mottoni and M

    P. De Mottoni and M. Schatzman. Geometrical evolution of developed inter- faces. In: Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 347 (1995), pp. 1533–1589

    1995

  3. [10]

    L. C. Evans. Measure Theory and Fine Properties of Functions . Routledge, 2018

    2018

  4. [11]

    M. Fei, F. Lin, W. Wang, and Z. Zhang. Matrix-valued Allen-Cahn equation and the Keller-Rubinstein-Sternberg problem . In: Invent. Math. 233 (2023), pp. 1–80

    2023

  5. [12]

    Fischer and S

    J. Fischer and S. Hensel. Weak-strong uniqueness for the Navier-Stokes equa- tion for two fluids with surface tension . In: Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 236 (2020), pp. 967–1087

    2020

  6. [13]

    Fischer, S

    J. Fischer, S. Hensel, T. Laux, and T. M. Simon. The local structure of the energy landscape in multiphase mean curvature flow: weak-strong uniqueness and stability of evolutions . In: J. Eur. Math. Soc. (2025). 40

    2025

  7. [14]

    Fischer, T

    J. Fischer, T. Laux, and T. M. Simon. Convergence rates of the Allen-Cahn equation to mean curvature flow: a short proof based on relative entropies . In: SIAM J. Appl. Math. 52 (2020), pp. 6222–6233

    2020

  8. [15]

    Fonseca and L

    I. Fonseca and L. Tartar. The gradient theory of phase transitions for systems with two potential wells . In: Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. A Math. 111 (1989), pp. 89–102

    1989

  9. [16]

    H. Garcke. On Cahn-Hilliard systems with elasticity . In: Proc. Roy. Soc. Ed- inb. A Math. 133 (2003), pp. 307–331

    2003

  10. [17]

    Hensel and T

    S. Hensel and T. Laux. BV solutions for mean curvature flow with con- stant contact angle: Allen-Cahn approximation and weak-strong uniqueness . In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.11150 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Hensel and T

    S. Hensel and T. Laux. Weak-strong uniqueness for the mean curvature flow of double bubbles . In: Interfaces Free Bound. 25 (2022), pp. 37–107

    2022

  12. [20]

    R. L. Jerrard and D. Smets. On the motion of a curve by its binormal curva- ture. In: J. Eur. Math. Soc. 17 (2015), pp. 1487–1515

    2015

  13. [21]

    T. Kagaya. Convergence of the Allen-Cahn equation with a zero Neumann boundary condition on non-convex domains . In: Math. Ann. 373 (2019), pp. 1485–1528

    2019

  14. [22]

    Katsoulakis, G

    M. Katsoulakis, G. T. Kossioris, and F. Reitich. Generalized motion by mean curvature with Neumann conditions and the Allen-Cahn model for phase tran- sitions. In: J. Geom. Anal. 5 (1995), pp. 255–279

    1995

  15. [23]

    Kroemer and T

    M. Kroemer and T. Laux. Quantitative convergence of the nonlocal Allen- Cahn equation to volume-preserving mean curvature flow . In: Math. Ann. 391 (2025), pp. 4455–4472

    2025

  16. [24]

    T. Laux. Weak-strong uniqueness for volume-preserving mean curvature flow. In: Revista Matem´ atica Iberoamericana40 (2024), pp. 93–110

    2024

  17. [25]

    Laux and Y

    T. Laux and Y. Liu. Nematic-isotropic phase transition in liquid crystals: a variational derivation of effective geometric motions . In: Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 241 (2021), pp. 1785–1814

    2021

  18. [26]

    Laux and T

    T. Laux and T. M. Simon. Convergence of the Allen-Cahn Equation to Multi- phase Mean Curvature Flow. In: Comm. Pure Appl. Math.71 (2018), pp. 1597– 1647

    2018

  19. [27]

    T. Laux, K. Stinson, and C. Ullrich. Diffuse-interface approximation and weak-strong uniqueness of anisotropic mean curvature flow . In: Eur. J. Appl. Math. 36 (2025), pp. 82–142

    2025

  20. [28]

    F. Lin, X. Pan, and C. Wang. Phase transition for potentials of high-dimensional wells. In: Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 65 (2012), pp. 833–888

    2012

  21. [29]

    Lin and C

    F. Lin and C. Wang. The analysis of harmonic maps and their heat flows . World Scientific, 2008

    2008

  22. [30]

    Lin and C

    F. Lin and C. Wang. Harmonic maps in connection of phase transitions with higher dimensional potential wells . In: Chinese Ann. Math. Ser. B 40 (2019), pp. 781–810

    2019

  23. [31]

    Y. Liu. Phase transition of an anisotropic Ginzburg-Landau equation. In: Calc. Var. Partial Diff. Equ. 63 (2024), p. 171. 41

    2024

  24. [32]

    Y. Liu. Phase transition of parabolic Ginzburg–Landau equation with poten- tials of high-dimensional wells . In: Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 78 (2025), pp. 1199–1247

    2025

  25. [33]

    F. Maggi. Sets of finite perimeter and geometric variational problems: an introduction to Geometric Measure Theory . Vol. 135. Cambridge University Press, 2012

    2012

  26. [34]

    Maggi, M

    F. Maggi, M. Novack, and D. Restrepo. A hierarchy of Plateau problems and the approximation of Plateau’s laws via the Allen-Cahn equation . 2023. arXiv: 2312.11139

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Mal´ y, D

    J. Mal´ y, D. Swanson, and W. Ziemer. The co-area formula for Sobolev map- pings. In: Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 355 (2001), pp. 477–492

    2001

  28. [36]

    Marshall-Stevens, M

    K. Marshall-Stevens, M. Takada, Y. Tonegawa, and M. Workman. Gradient flow of phase transitions with fixed contact angle . 2024. arXiv: 2411.17979

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Mizuno and Y

    M. Mizuno and Y. Tonegawa. Convergence of the Allen-Cahn equation with Neumann boundary conditions. In: SIAM J. Appl. Math. 47 (2015), pp. 1906– 1932

    2015

  30. [38]

    L. Modica. The gradient theory of phase transitions and the minimal interface criterion. In: Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 98 (1987), pp. 123–142

    1987

  31. [39]

    M. Moser. Convergence of the scalar-and vector-valued Allen-Cahn equation to mean curvature flow with 90-contact angle in higher dimensions, part I: convergence result. In: Asymptot. Anal. 131 (2023), pp. 297–383

    2023

  32. [40]

    N. C. Owen and P. Sternberg. Gradient flow and front propagation with bound- ary contact energy. In: Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 437 (1992), pp. 715–728

    1992

  33. [41]

    Rubinstein, P

    J. Rubinstein, P. Sternberg, and J. B. Keller. Fast reaction, slow diffusion, and curve shortening . In: SIAM J. Appl. Math. 49 (1989), pp. 116–133

    1989

  34. [42]

    Rubinstein, P

    J. Rubinstein, P. Sternberg, and J. B. Keller. Reaction-diffusion processes and evolution to harmonic maps . In: SIAM J. Appl. Math. 49 (1989), pp. 1722– 1733

    1989

  35. [43]

    Sternberg

    P. Sternberg. The effect of a singular perturbation on nonconvex variational problems. In: Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 101 (1988), pp. 209–260. Appendix A. An outline of the proof of Lemma 2.6 Let T >0 be fixed, N∈ N+ and τ =τ(N) := T N . Define u0 N := uϵ,0∈H1(Ω), satisfying t...

    1988

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.