Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 3 minor 58 references

A phylogeny of biological patterns formed by nonlocal advection

T0 review · 5 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A two-species nonlocal advection-diffusion model on a 2D torus produces a reproducible phylogeny of patterns, from homogeneous states through clusters, stripes, diamonds, volcanos, and halos to oscillations and chase-and-run.

desk verdict Useful 2D pattern catalog, but the phylogeny framing is not yet supported because of a false uniqueness claim and missing numerical details. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.00489 v1 pith:ST2H7YBS submitted 2025-05-31 q-bio.PE math.AP

Valeria Giunta , Thomas Hillen , Mark A. Lewis , Jonathan R. Potts This is my paper
classification q-bio.PEmath.AP MSC 35B3635K5792C1592D25
keywords nonlocaladvection-diffusiontwo-speciespatternformationself-attractionandself-repulsionmutualattractionrepulsionspatialsegregationchase-and-rundynamicsphylogenybiologicalself-organisation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a numerical investigation of how four nonlocal interaction parameters, $\gamma_{ij}$, shape the spatial patterns formed by a two-species advection-diffusion model on a two-dimensional torus. The central claim is that the model generates a reproducible 'phylogeny' of pattern classes: starting from the homogeneous steady state, increasing attraction or repulsion in different combinations produces co-aggregates, segregated clusters, stripes, diagonal stripes, diamonds, volcanos, halos, and, for mixed signs, oscillations and chase-and-run. The paper maps each branch of this phylogeny to the underlying movement mechanism, so that observing a pattern in a biological system could indicate which nonlocal interactions are at work. This matters because the same equations describe territorial animals, cell sorting, macrophage spacing, bacterial rings, and tumour dispersal, and a mechanism-to-pattern dictionary would connect each observation to a plausible microscopic rule.

What carries the argument

The workhorse is the two-species nonlocal advection-diffusion system itself (Eq. 1), in which each density $u_i$ changes by diffusion plus advection along the gradient of a weighted convolution $\gamma_{ij} \nabla(K_{ij} * u_j)$. The kernel $K_{ij}$ is a fixed compactly supported bump function with radius $R_{ij}=0.3$, and the parameters $\gamma_{ij}$ encode whether each population attracts ($\gamma<0$) or repels ($\gamma>0$) itself and its neighbour. The central organising device is the 'phylogeny of patterns' in Figure 6, a graph whose nodes are stationary pattern classes and whose edges are parameter-driven transitions, each labelled by the parameter whose increase causes the change; linear stability thresholds from the Supplementary Information mark where the homogeneous state loses stability and patterns can begin.

What would settle it

Re-running the same parameter scan with a finer grid, a different time integrator, and a longer integration horizon would settle the claim; if any labelled class in Figures 2-5, such as diamonds at $\gamma_{11}=\gamma_{22}=-1$ with $\gamma_{12}=\gamma_{21}=2$, changes category under grid refinement or after the transient time is doubled, then the phylogeny is not a robust property of System (1).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On a two-dimensional torus with equal diffusion coefficients, equal total masses, and a fixed symmetric detection kernel, System (1) produces at least nineteen numerically observed solution classes as the four $\gamma_{ij}$ vary. The paper argues that these classes form a tree-like phylogeny (Figure 6) whose root is the spatially homogeneous steady state and whose directed edges are transitions caused by increasing the magnitude of a particular self-interaction or mutual-interaction parameter. The mapping is mechanistic: strong self-attraction aggregates a population and sharpens clusters; self-repulsion disperses a population and introduces ridges, holes, and halos; mutual attraction co-aggregates the two species whenever it is strong enough; mutual repulsion segregates them, with balanced parameters giving stripes and strong asymmetry giving a refuge aggregation in which one population clusters while the other spreads out; and opposite-sign mutual interactions give oscillations or chase-and-run provided self-attraction is strong. The paper then uses this dictionary to reinterpret empirical patterns, including pedestrian lanes, polygonal animal territories, regular macrophage spacing, bacterial concentric rings, embryonic cell sorting, and the dispersal of metastatic cells.

Load-bearing premise

The entire classification assumes that the nineteen reported patterns are genuine long-time solutions of System (1); because the paper does not state the grid resolution, time-stepping scheme, stopping time, or initial perturbation amplitude, an under-resolved or prematurely stopped solver could produce pattern labels that are numerical artifacts rather than true dynamics.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the pattern classes are robust, Figure 6 lets a researcher read a mechanism off a single spatial snapshot: sharp clusters with holes suggest self-repulsion, symmetric stripes suggest balanced mutual avoidance, and a compact cluster surrounded by dispersed individuals suggests strongly asymmetric avoidance.
  • The phylogeny predicts how a system responds to gradual changes in behaviour, such as when metastatic cells lose self-adhesion: weakening $\gamma_{11}$ disperses $u_1$ while $u_2$ stays aggregated.
  • Mutual avoidance alone, without external directional cues, is sufficient to form lane-like stripes and, with three to six species, hexagonal, square, and irregular polygonal territories.
  • The parameter map also delimits when dynamic behaviour should be expected: chase-and-run needs strong self-attraction and opposite-sign mutual interactions, and it remains fragile when both species sense over the same range.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's pattern-to-mechanism dictionary could be inverted to fit $\gamma_{ij}$ values from observed biological images, yielding quantitative predictions for how the pattern should change when a population's interaction range or strength is perturbed; the authors do not perform such inverse fitting.
  • Because only one kernel shape, one set of domain sizes, and a square torus are tested, the phylogeny's status as a general property of nonlocal advection models is open; a natural check is whether the same tree appears for other kernels, domain geometries, and diffusion ratios.
  • The absence of a biological example for some pattern classes could be read not as a failure of the model but as a hypothesis about evolution or observation: those mechanisms may be selected against, or simply not yet seen.
  • A testable extension suggested by the chase-and-run discussion is that unequal sensing ranges, rather than unequal interaction strengths, provide a separate route to robust pursuit; running the same scan with $R_{12}\neq R_{21}$ would isolate that effect.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reports a numerical study of a two-species nonlocal advection-diffusion system on a two-dimensional torus, Eq. (1), with zero-mean compactly supported interaction kernels. By varying the interaction parameters gamma_ij on an integer grid and starting from small random perturbations of the homogeneous state, the authors catalogue nineteen visually distinct solution types, including segregated clusters, stripes, diamonds, volcanos, halos, oscillations, and chase-and-run. They organize these observations into a schematic 'phylogeny' (Figure 6) and relate several of the computed patterns to biological examples such as pedestrian lanes, territorial mosaics, macrophage distributions, bacterial rings, cell sorting, and metastatic dispersal. The central claim is that the four interaction parameters determine a reproducible classification of emergent 2D patterns and that this classification can be linked to underlying movement mechanisms.

Significance. If the reported classification is reliable, the paper would provide a useful mechanism-to-pattern dictionary for two-species nonlocal advection models in 2D, going beyond the predominantly 1D analyses in the existing literature. The systematic sweep over integer parameter values and the attempt to attach biological interpretations to individual pattern classes are valuable and could guide future analytical and numerical work. No parameters are fitted to data, and the linear stability thresholds are stated as analytical inputs rather than outputs of the simulations, which is a strength. However, the central classification currently rests on unverifiable numerical and analytical support: the stability calculations are in an absent Supplementary Information file, the numerical discretization and convergence checks are not described, and the pattern labels are assigned by visual inspection. The manuscript also contains an incorrect claim that mass conservation implies uniqueness of the steady state, which conflicts with the multistability results cited from the authors' own earlier work.

major comments (5)
  1. [§2, Eq. (2)] The statement that mass conservation 'implies' the system has a unique steady state is not correct. Conservation of total mass fixes only the spatially uniform steady state; it does not exclude nonuniform stationary solutions. The manuscript itself later notes that in 1D, strongly modulated patterns coexist with the homogeneous state and with more regularly patterned solutions, so multistability is already known for this class of models. This matters for Figure 6, because a single phylogeny of patterns presupposes that the final state is a deterministic function of the parameters, whereas each simulation from a small random perturbation samples only one basin of attraction. The uniqueness claim should be removed or substantially qualified, and the possibility of multiple coexisting stable patterns should be addressed explicitly.
  2. [§3, Figures 2–5] The numerical methods used to solve Eq. (1) are not specified. The manuscript does not state the spatial discretization, grid resolution, time-stepping scheme, time step, stopping time, or any grid-convergence or transient-length checks. Without this information, the reported pattern classes cannot be distinguished from numerical artifacts, especially because the patterns include fine features such as ridges, holes, and halos. A methods subsection or SI appendix with these details, plus convergence tests for representative parameter combinations, is necessary to support the claim that the figures show true long-time solutions of the PDE.
  3. [§3.1 and SI] The linear stability conditions are cited to a Supplementary Information file that is not included in the preprint (Equations S8–S17). Since these thresholds are used to define instability regions and to interpret the simulation results, their absence prevents verification of a central analytical input. The authors should include the SI file or, at minimum, provide the dispersion relations and stability boundaries in the main text or an appendix.
  4. [Table 1 and Figures 2–5] Pattern classes are assigned by visual inspection, without quantitative criteria. Terms such as 'Stripes', 'Diagonal Stripes', 'Mixed Stripes', and 'Ridged Stripes' are not defined operationally, and no metrics (for example, Fourier mode amplitudes, density variance, interface orientation, or cluster morphology measures) are reported to justify the distinctions. Since the phylogeny in Figure 6 is built from these class labels, the classification needs to be made reproducible, either through explicit quantitative classifiers or through a documented protocol.
  5. [Figure 6 and §3.5] The arrows in Figure 6 are described as transitions between patterns as parameter magnitudes are increased, but the manuscript does not show that these transitions occur along connected solution branches. The observations come from discrete parameter grids with fixed initial conditions, and no continuation or bifurcation analysis is performed. Given the authors' own discussion of multistability in §2, an arrow between two patterns could reflect a jump to a different basin rather than a true bifurcation. The figure should be explicitly labelled as a summary of observed simulation outcomes, or supported by continuation results along the indicated parameter paths.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figure 5 caption] The caption lists γ22 = −1 (right), γ22 = 1 (center), and γ22 = 20 (left), but the text in §3.4 describes the right grid as the case γ22 = −2. Please correct the inconsistency between the caption and the body text.
  2. [§3.1] The sentence 'These stripes can either be parallel to one of the axes' appears directly after a discussion of Segregated Clusters, which is not a striped pattern. The wording implies that the preceding clusters are stripes; please rephrase to make the pattern type being described clear.
  3. [§3.5] The phrase 'phylogenic tree' should be 'phylogenetic tree' for consistency with the rest of the manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the pattern phylogeny is a numerical output, not an input; no fitted parameters are relabelled as predictions and self-citations are contextual.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is simulation followed by classification. The pattern classes in Figures 2-6 are outputs of numerically integrating Eq. (1) from a random perturbation of the homogeneous state, not quantities defined in terms of those classes. The linear stability thresholds quoted in Sections 3.1-3.4 are independent analytical inputs derived in the SI, and the numerical solutions are checked against them rather than fitted to them. No biological data are used to tune the gamma_ij parameters, so Section 4's comparisons are interpretive rather than circular. The self-citations [20,23,26,29] concern well-posedness, 1D weakly nonlinear analysis, and 1D energy methods; these provide context and motivation, not load-bearing derivations of the 2D taxonomy. The chase-and-run reference [22] is used only to explain why equal sensing ranges do not preserve chase-and-run dynamics, and it does not define the phylogeny. One non-circular concern should be flagged: Section 2's statement that mass conservation implies a unique steady state is an overstatement, since conservation fixes only the uniform state and does not rule out non-uniform steady states; however, this is a mathematical correctness issue, not a case of the paper's predictions reducing to its inputs by construction. Likewise, missing numerical discretization and transient-length details are reproducibility concerns, not circularity. Under the stated standard, there is no exhibited reduction where an output equals an input by definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model parameters are chosen by hand and the pattern taxonomy is generated from simulations, not derived from data. No parameters are fitted to empirical observations, and no new entities are postulated. The key unstated assumptions are numerical convergence and the biological relevance of visual pattern matching.

free parameters (6)
  • gamma_ij interaction strengths = Integers in [-5,5], with gamma_22 = 20 in Case 4
    Varied systematically to map pattern classes; the central taxonomy is organized around these values, though they are not fitted to data.
  • Sensing radius R_ij = 0.3 (0.2 for N > 2)
    Chosen by hand; pattern selection can depend strongly on interaction range.
  • Diffusion coefficients D_i = 1
    Set equal to isolate interaction effects; affects relative mobility and pattern length scales.
  • Total masses m_i = 1
    Set equal; mass controls the homogeneous steady-state density and nonlinear saturation.
  • Domain side lengths L_1, L_2 = 1
    Periodic torus [0,1]^2; domain size sets the available modes for pattern formation.
  • Kernel shape = Raised cosine, Eq. (3)
    Ad hoc smooth kernel; other kernels could shift pattern boundaries, so the taxonomy is kernel-specific.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption System (1) is an adequate representation of the biological systems discussed.
    The paper assumes nonlocal advection-diffusion captures the essential movement mechanisms for territoriality, macrophages, bacteria, and cell sorting; no quantitative validation against these systems is given.
  • standard math The linear stability conditions quoted from the SI (Eqs. S8-S17) are correct.
    The SI is not included in the preprint, yet the instability regions that guide the simulations are taken from it.
  • domain assumption Numerical solutions have converged to the long-time dynamics.
    No discretization, grid refinement, time-stepping, or stopping criteria are reported, so convergence is assumed.
  • ad hoc to paper Visual similarity between model patterns and natural patterns is evidence of shared mechanism.
    Section 4 uses visual resemblance to argue the model 'can help reveal possible mechanisms', without quantitative or causal support.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A phylogeny of biological patterns formed by nonlocal advection." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ST2H7YBS

@misc{pith2026250600489,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A phylogeny of biological patterns formed by nonlocal advection},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ST2H7YBS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.00489}
}
read the original abstract

From tumour invasion to cell sorting and animal territoriality, many biological systems rely on nonlocal interactions that drive complex spatial organisation. Partial differential equations (PDEs) with nonlocal advection are increasingly recognised as powerful tools for capturing such phenomena. However, most research has focused on one-dimensional domains, leaving their two-dimensional behaviour largely unexplored. Here, we present a detailed numerical study of the patterns formed by these systems on 2D domains. Depending on the underlying mechanisms, a wide variety of spatial patterns can emerge - including segregated clusters, stripes, volcanos, and polygonal mosaics - many of which have been observed in natural systems. By systematically varying model parameters, we classify the links between emergent patterns and their underlying movement mechanisms. In comparing these patterns with empirical observations, we show how this modelling framework can help reveal possible mechanisms of self-organisation in various situations within the life sciences, from ecology and developmental biology to cancer research.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.00489 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. List of stationary and non-stationary numerical solutions obtained by solving System (1), with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Case 1: Symmetric interactions. Pattern selection across the interaction parameter space (γii, γij ), where γii = γ11 = γ22 and γij = γ12 = γ21. We classify the numerical solutions obtained by solving System (1), with Kij given in (3), for each pair of integer values (γii, γij ) ∈ [−5, 5]×[−5, 5]. The other parameter values are as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Case 2: No self-interaction in u1. Pattern selection for γ11 = 0 across the interaction parameter space (γ21, γ22, γ12). We show the class of the numerical solutions obtained by solving System (1), with Kij given in (3), for three values of γ22 (γ22 = −1 (right), γ22 = 0 (center), γ22 = 1 (left)), and for each pair of integer values (γ21, γ12) ∈ [−5, 5] × [−5, 5]. The other parameter values are as in [PITH_FULL_IMA… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Case 3: Self-repulsion in u1. Pattern selection for γ11 = 1 across the interaction parameter space (γ21, γ22, γ12). We show the class of the numerical solutions obtained by solving System (1), with Kij given in (3), for three values of γ22 (γ22 = −1 (right), γ22 = 1 (c…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Case 4: Self-attraction in u1. Pattern selection for γ11 = −1 across the interaction parameter space (γ21, γ22, γ12). We show the class of the numerical solutions obtained by solving System (1), with Kij given in (3), for three values of γ22 (γ22 = −1 (right), γ22 = 1 …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The phylogeny of pattern formation, illustrating the role of interaction parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Geometric stationary patterns obtained by solving System (1), with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution

    SA Kauffman. “The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution”. In:Spin glasses and biology. World Scientific, 1992, 61–100

    work page 1992

  2. [2]

    Synergistic action of nectins and cadherins generates the mosaic cellular pattern of the olfactory epithelium

    S Katsunuma, H Honda, T Shinoda, Y Ishimoto, T Miyata, H Kiyonari, T Abe, Ki Nibu, Y Takai, and H Togashi. “Synergistic action of nectins and cadherins generates the mosaic cellular pattern of the olfactory epithelium”.Journal of Cell Biology212.5 (2016), 561–575

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Approaches to the study of territory size and shape

    ES Adams. “Approaches to the study of territory size and shape”.Annual review of ecology and systematics 32.1 (2001), 277–303

    work page 2001

  4. [4]

    Spatial models and biomedical applications

    JD Murray. “Spatial models and biomedical applications”.Mathematical Biology(2003)

    work page 2003

  5. [5]

    A nonlocal continuum model for biological aggregation

    CM Topaz, AL Bertozzi, and MA Lewis. “A nonlocal continuum model for biological aggregation”.Bulletin of mathematical biology68 (2006), 1601–1623

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    The impact of adhesion on cellular invasion processes in cancer and development

    KJ Painter, NJ Armstrong, and JA Sherratt. “The impact of adhesion on cellular invasion processes in cancer and development”.Journal of theoretical biology264.3 (2010), 1057–1067

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    How memory of direct animal interactions can lead to territorial pattern formation

    JR Potts and MA Lewis. “How memory of direct animal interactions can lead to territorial pattern formation”.Journal of the Royal Society Interface13.118 (2016), 20160059

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    A population dynamics model of cell-cell adhesion incorporating population pressure and density saturation

    JA Carrillo, H Murakawa, M Sato, H Togashi, and O Trush. “A population dynamics model of cell-cell adhesion incorporating population pressure and density saturation”.Journal of theoretical biology474 (2019), 14–24

    work page 2019

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    Nonlocal adhesion models for microorganisms on bounded domains

    T Hillen and A Buttenschon. “Nonlocal adhesion models for microorganisms on bounded domains”.SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics80.1 (2020), 382–401

    2020

  2. [10]

    Collective animal behavior

    DJ Sumpter. “Collective animal behavior”. In:Collective animal behavior. Princeton University Press, 2010

    2010

  3. [11]

    Spatio-temporal dynamics in the response of woodland caribou and moose to the passage of grey wolf

    G Latombe, D Fortin, and L Parrott. “Spatio-temporal dynamics in the response of woodland caribou and moose to the passage of grey wolf”.Journal of Animal Ecology83.1 (2014), 185–198

    2014

  4. [12]

    Moving to stay in place: behavioral mechanisms for coexistence of African large carnivores

    AT Vanak, D Fortin, M Thaker, M Ogden, C Owen, S Greatwood, and R Slotow. “Moving to stay in place: behavioral mechanisms for coexistence of African large carnivores”.Ecology94.11 (2013), 2619–2631

    2013

  5. [13]

    Territorial pattern formation in the absence of an attractive potential

    JR Potts and MA Lewis. “Territorial pattern formation in the absence of an attractive potential”.Journal of mathematical biology72 (2016), 25–46

    2016

  6. [14]

    Cytonemes as specialized signaling filopodia

    TB Kornberg and S Roy. “Cytonemes as specialized signaling filopodia”.Development141.4 (2014), 729– 736

    2014

  7. [15]

    Mathematical models for cell migration: a non-local perspective

    L Chen, K Painter, C Surulescu, and A Zhigun. “Mathematical models for cell migration: a non-local perspective”.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B375.1807 (2020), 20190379. 14

    2020

  8. [16]

    Biological modeling with nonlocal advection–diffusion equations

    KJ Painter, T Hillen, and JR Potts. “Biological modeling with nonlocal advection–diffusion equations”. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences34.01 (2024), 57–107

    2024

  9. [17]

    Nonlocal models in biology and life sciences: sources, developments, and applica- tions

    S Pal and R Melnik. “Nonlocal models in biology and life sciences: sources, developments, and applica- tions”.Physics of Life Reviews(2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    Aggregation-diffusion equations: dynamics, asymptotics, and singular limits

    JA Carrillo, K Craig, and Y Yao. “Aggregation-diffusion equations: dynamics, asymptotics, and singular limits”.Active Particles, Volume 2: Advances in Theory, Models, and Applications(2019), 65–108

    2019

  11. [19]

    Spatial memory and taxis-driven pattern formation in model ecosystems

    JR Potts and MA Lewis. “Spatial memory and taxis-driven pattern formation in model ecosystems”. Bulletin of mathematical biology81 (2019), 2725–2747

    2019

  12. [20]

    Local and global existence for nonlocal multispecies advection-diffusion models

    V Giunta, T Hillen, M Lewis, and JR Potts. “Local and global existence for nonlocal multispecies advection-diffusion models”.SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems21.3 (2022), 1686–1708

    2022

  13. [21]

    Patterning of nonlocal transport models in biology: the impact of spatial dimension

    TJ Jewell, AL Krause, PK Maini, and EA Gaffney. “Patterning of nonlocal transport models in biology: the impact of spatial dimension”.Mathematical Biosciences366 (2023), 109093

    2023

  14. [22]

    Variations in non-local interaction range lead to emergent chase-and-run in heterogeneous populations

    KJ Painter, V Giunta, JR Potts, and S Bernardi. “Variations in non-local interaction range lead to emergent chase-and-run in heterogeneous populations”.Journal of the Royal Society Interface21.219 (2024), 20240409

    2024

  15. [23]

    Weakly nonlinear analysis of a two-species non-local advection–diffusion system

    V Giunta, T Hillen, MA Lewis, and JR Potts. “Weakly nonlinear analysis of a two-species non-local advection–diffusion system”.Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications78 (2024), 104086

    2024

  16. [24]

    Biological aggregations from spatial memory and nonlocal advection

    D Liu, Y Salmaniw, JR Potts, J Shi, and H Wang. “Biological aggregations from spatial memory and nonlocal advection”.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02370(2023)

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Phase transitions for nonlinear nonlocal aggregation-diffusion equations

    JA Carrillo and RS Gvalani. “Phase transitions for nonlinear nonlocal aggregation-diffusion equations”. Communications in mathematical physics382.1 (2021), 485–545

    2021

  18. [26]

    Detecting minimum energy states and multi-stability in nonlocal advection–diffusion models for interacting species

    V Giunta, T Hillen, MA Lewis, and JR Potts. “Detecting minimum energy states and multi-stability in nonlocal advection–diffusion models for interacting species”.Journal of Mathematical Biology85.5 (2022), 56

    2022

  19. [27]

    Aggregation-diffusion equations for collective behaviour in the sciences

    R Bailo, JA Carrillo, and D G´ omez-Castro. “Aggregation-diffusion equations for collective behaviour in the sciences”.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.16679(2024)

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Fully discrete positivity-preserving and energy-dissipating schemes for aggregation-diffusion equations with a gradient flow structure

    R Bailo, JA Carrillo, and J Hu. “Fully discrete positivity-preserving and energy-dissipating schemes for aggregation-diffusion equations with a gradient flow structure”.arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.11502(2018)

    2018 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Positivity and global existence for nonlocal advection-diffusion models of interacting populations

    V Giunta, T Hillen, M Lewis, and J Potts. “Positivity and global existence for nonlocal advection-diffusion models of interacting populations”.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.09692(2023)

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Long-time behaviour and phase transitions for the McKean–Vlasov equation on the torus

    JA Carrillo, RS Gvalani, GA Pavliotis, and A Schlichting. “Long-time behaviour and phase transitions for the McKean–Vlasov equation on the torus”.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis235.1 (2020), 635–690

    2020

  23. [31]

    Nonlocal cross-diffusion systems for multi-species populations and networks

    A J¨ ungel, S Portisch, and A Zurek. “Nonlocal cross-diffusion systems for multi-species populations and networks”.Nonlinear Analysis219 (2022), 112800

    2022

  24. [32]

    Well-posedness of aggregation-diffusion systems with irregular kernels

    JA Carrillo, Y Salmaniw, and J Skrzeczkowski. “Well-posedness of aggregation-diffusion systems with irregular kernels”.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09227(2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    Self-organized pedestrian crowd dynamics: Experi- ments, simulations, and design solutions

    D Helbing, L Buzna, A Johansson, and T Werner. “Self-organized pedestrian crowd dynamics: Experi- ments, simulations, and design solutions”.Transportation science39.1 (2005), 1–24

    2005

  26. [34]

    Traffic instabilities in self-organized pedestrian crowds

    M Moussaid, EG Guillot, M Moreau, J Fehrenbach, O Chabiron, S Lemercier, J Pettr´ e, C Appert-Rolland, P Degond, and G Theraulaz. “Traffic instabilities in self-organized pedestrian crowds”.PLoS computa- tional biology8.3 (2012), e1002442

    2012

  27. [35]

    Empirical analysis of the lane formation process in bidirectional pedestrian flow

    C Feliciani and K Nishinari. “Empirical analysis of the lane formation process in bidirectional pedestrian flow”.Physical Review E94.3 (2016), 032304

    2016

  28. [36]

    Analysis of emergent patterns in crossing flows of pedestrians reveals an invariant of ‘stripe’formation in human data

    P Mullick, S Fontaine, C Appert-Rolland, AH Olivier, WH Warren, and J Pettr´ e. “Analysis of emergent patterns in crossing flows of pedestrians reveals an invariant of ‘stripe’formation in human data”.PLoS computational biology18.6 (2022), e1010210

    2022

  29. [37]

    Quantifying behavioral changes in territorial animals caused by sudden population declines

    JR Potts, S Harris, and L Giuggioli. “Quantifying behavioral changes in territorial animals caused by sudden population declines”.The American Naturalist182.3 (2013), E73–E82

    2013

  30. [38]

    Modelling territoriality and wolf–deer interactions

    M Lewis and J Murray. “Modelling territoriality and wolf–deer interactions”.Nature366.6457 (1993), 738–740

    1993

  31. [39]

    Spatial self-organization of ecosystems: integrating multiple mechanisms of regular-pattern formation

    RM Pringle and CE Tarnita. “Spatial self-organization of ecosystems: integrating multiple mechanisms of regular-pattern formation”.Annual review of Entomology62.1 (2017), 359–377. 15

    2017

  32. [40]

    Hexagonal territories

    GW Barlow. “Hexagonal territories”.Animal Behaviour22 (1974), 876–IN1

    1974

  33. [41]

    Polyhedral territories of animal

    P Grant. “Polyhedral territories of animal”.The American Naturalist102.923 (1968), 75–80

    1968

  34. [42]

    The mononuclear phagocyte system: the relationship between monocytes and macrophages

    DA Hume, KM Irvine, and C Pridans. “The mononuclear phagocyte system: the relationship between monocytes and macrophages”.Trends in immunology40.2 (2019), 98–112

    2019

  35. [43]

    Muscularis macrophage development in the absence of an enteric nervous system

    M Avetisyan, JE Rood, S Huerta Lopez, R Sengupta, E Wright-Jin, JD Dougherty, EM Behrens, and RO Heuckeroth. “Muscularis macrophage development in the absence of an enteric nervous system”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115.18 (2018), 4696–4701

    2018

  36. [44]

    Origins and diversity of macrophages in health and disease

    G Sreejit, AJ Fleetwood, AJ Murphy, and PR Nagareddy. “Origins and diversity of macrophages in health and disease”.Clinical & Translational Immunology9.12 (2020), e1222

    2020

  37. [45]

    Mechanisms of neutrophil-induced parenchymal cell injury

    H Jaeschke and CW Smith. “Mechanisms of neutrophil-induced parenchymal cell injury”.Journal of leukocyte biology61.6 (1997), 647–653

    1997

  38. [46]

    Multiple sclerosis pathology: evolution of pathogenetic concepts

    H Lassmann. “Multiple sclerosis pathology: evolution of pathogenetic concepts”.Brain Pathology15.3 (2005), 217–222

    2005

  39. [47]

    The diagnosis is in the rings

    S Ingen-Housz-Oro, N Ortonne, and O Chosidow. “The diagnosis is in the rings”.BMJ359 (2017)

    2017

  40. [48]

    Demyelination patterns in a mathematical model of multiple sclerosis

    M Lombardo, R Barresi, E Bilotta, F Gargano, P Pantano, and M Sammartino. “Demyelination patterns in a mathematical model of multiple sclerosis”.Journal of mathematical biology75 (2017), 373–417

    2017

  41. [49]

    Axisymmetric solutions for a chemotaxis model of Multiple Sclerosis

    E Bilotta, F Gargano, V Giunta, M Lombardo, P Pantano, and M Sammartino. “Axisymmetric solutions for a chemotaxis model of Multiple Sclerosis”.Ricerche di matematica68 (2019), 281–294

    2019

  42. [50]

    Pattern formation and transition to chaos in a chemotaxis model of acute inflammation

    V Giunta, MC Lombardo, and M Sammartino. “Pattern formation and transition to chaos in a chemotaxis model of acute inflammation”.SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems20.4 (2021), 1844–1881

    2021

  43. [51]

    Spatio-temporal patterns generated by Salmonella typhimurium

    DE Woodward, R Tyson, M Myerscough, J Murray, E Budrene, and H Berg. “Spatio-temporal patterns generated by Salmonella typhimurium”.Biophysical journal68.5 (1995), 2181–2189

    1995

  44. [52]

    Reconstruction of tissues by dissociated cells

    M Steinberg. “Reconstruction of tissues by dissociated cells”.Science141.3579 (1963), 401–408

    1963

  45. [53]

    Does differential adhesion govern self-assembly processes in histogenesis? Equilibrium con- figurations and the emergence of a hierarchy among populations of embryonic cells

    M Steinberg. “Does differential adhesion govern self-assembly processes in histogenesis? Equilibrium con- figurations and the emergence of a hierarchy among populations of embryonic cells.”The Journal of experimental zoology173.4 (1970-04), 395–433

    1970

  46. [54]

    A continuum approach to modelling cell–cell adhesion

    NJ Armstrong, KJ Painter, and JA Sherratt. “A continuum approach to modelling cell–cell adhesion”. Journal of theoretical biology243.1 (2006), 98–113

    2006

  47. [55]

    Cancer invasion and metastasis: molecular and cellular perspective

    TA Martin, L Ye, AJ Sanders, J Lane, and WG Jiang. “Cancer invasion and metastasis: molecular and cellular perspective”. In:Madame Curie Bioscience Database [Internet]. Landes Bioscience, 2013

    2013

  48. [56]

    pde2path-A Matlab package for continuation and bifurcation in 2D elliptic systems

    H Uecker, D Wetzel, and JD Rademacher. “pde2path-A Matlab package for continuation and bifurcation in 2D elliptic systems”.Numerical Mathematics: Theory, Methods and Applications7.1 (2014), 58–106

    2014

  49. [57]

    AUTO-07p: Continuation and Bifurcation Software for Ordinary Differential Equations

    E Doedel. “AUTO-07p: Continuation and Bifurcation Software for Ordinary Differential Equations”. Version 0.7(2010)

    2010

  50. [58]

    Hopf bifurcations in the full SKT model and where to find them

    C Soresina. “Hopf bifurcations in the full SKT model and where to find them”.Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems-S15.9 (2022), 2673–2693. 16

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.