Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 37 references

Jet breakup dynamics of viscoelastic carboxymethyl cellulose solutions

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that increasing carboxymethyl cellulose concentration controls the breakup of low-speed liquid jets: higher polymer content delays pinch-off, lengthens the liquid thread, shifts the flow from dripping to Rayleigh…

desk verdict A genuinely new CMC jet-breakup dataset with credible qualitative trends, but the quantitative section has unit errors and the 'elasticity' mechanism is asserted, not measured. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.00516 v1 pith:MTZP5JEE submitted 2025-05-31 physics.flu-dyn

Ketan Vinayak Warghat , Yogesh Biswal , Sukesh Sharma , Pankaj Sharadchandra Kolhe , Lakshmana Dora Chandrala , Kirti Chandra Sahu This is my paper
classification physics.flu-dyn PACS 47.55.D47.50.-d47.60.Kz
keywords jetbreakupviscoelasticcarboxymethylcellulosedrippingregimeRayleighpinch-offsatellitedropletsshear-thinning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports an experimental study of low-flow-rate jets made of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) solutions in water, with concentrations of 1, 2, and 3 weight percent. It claims that raising the CMC concentration strengthens viscoelastic effects, which prolong jet lifetimes, extend the liquid thread before pinch-off, and change how droplets detach. At the highest concentrations, the fluid's elasticity is said to suppress capillary-driven instabilities, slow thinning, and produce beaded structures and satellite drops that move upward. If this is right, CMC concentration becomes a practical control parameter for droplet size, thread length, and breakup timing in applications such as inkjet printing and pharmaceutical droplet formation.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a systematic parameter sweep: three CMC concentrations, three needle diameters (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mm), and flow rates from 2 to 14 × $10^{-8}$ $m^{3}$/s, visualized with a high-speed camera at 15,000 frames per second. A shadowgraphy and image-processing pipeline measures liquid thread length, jet length, and droplet volume by revolving pixel areas about the symmetry axis. The rheological characterization fits the Carreau-Yasuda model to obtain zero-shear viscosity, the characteristic time constant λ, and the power-law index n, which together place each solution in a dimensionless Weber-Ohnesorge regime.

What would settle it

Measure the extensional relaxation time of the 1%, 2%, and 3% CMC solutions with a capillary breakup extensional rheometer (filament-thinning test). If the measured relaxation time is zero or the thinning dynamics match a purely viscous shear-thinning fluid with the same μ0 and n but no polymer elasticity, then the delayed breakup and upward satellite motion are not caused by elasticity.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using high-speed shadowgraphy, the authors show that as CMC concentration increases from 1 wt% to 3 wt%, the breakup mode shifts from dripping to Rayleigh breakup, with the Ohnesorge number rising from roughly 578 to about 14,295 at a fixed needle diameter and flow rate. They find that higher concentrations produce longer liquid threads and jet lengths, delay droplet detachment, and generate satellite droplets that recoil upward and often merge back into the primary drop. The paper attributes these observations to elastic stresses that resist capillary-driven thinning, thereby stabilizing the jet and altering pinch-off dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's causal story requires that the shear-thinning time constant λ in the Carreau-Yasuda fit behave like a polymer relaxation time, but no elastic modulus or extensional viscosity was measured, so elasticity is asserted rather than demonstrated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is correct, increasing CMC concentration alone can delay jet breakup and extend thread length without changing the flow rate or nozzle size.
  • At fixed flow rate, droplet volume increases with both CMC concentration and needle diameter, giving a formulation-based tuning knob for drop size.
  • The observed regime shift from dripping (Oh ~ 500) to Rayleigh breakup (Oh ~ 10^4) means concentration can switch the breakup regime in low-speed jets.
  • Satellite droplets recoil upward and often coalesce with the primary drop, which would change the final droplet size distribution in a way that depends on polymer content.
  • Larger needle diameters produce thicker, more stable jets at high CMC concentration, so nozzle choice and concentration interact in controlling breakup length.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Going beyond the paper, the same concentration effect should be testable in a numerical simulation with a proper viscoelastic constitutive model; if the simulated breakup does not show delayed pinch-off and upward satellite motion, the proposed elastic mechanism would be called into question.
  • The upward satellite motion could be checked independently by tracking the satellite's acceleration and comparing it with an elastic recoil force estimated from a separately measured relaxation time; the paper leaves this quantitative force balance undone.
  • A practical extension for formulation work: if the elastic stabilization is real, small additions of CMC could suppress unwanted satellite drops in inkjet printing by pulling them back into the main drop, but this needs verification at the higher shear rates of actual printing nozzles.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experimental study of jet breakup of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) solutions in the dripping and Rayleigh regimes. The authors vary CMC concentration (1, 2, 3 wt.%), needle diameter (0.5, 1, 2 mm), and flow rate (2–14 × 10^-8 m^3/s), and use high-speed shadowgraphy to measure jet length, liquid thread length, droplet volume, droplet period, and breakup morphology. They fit a Carreau-Yasuda model to steady-shear rheometry data and measure surface tension via pendant drop. The central claim is that increasing CMC concentration enhances viscoelastic effects, prolonging jet lifetimes, extending threads, and driving upward satellite motion through elastic stresses. The qualitative observations of delayed breakup and longer threads at higher concentration are plausible from the images, but the quantitative analysis contains serious unit errors, and the attribution to elasticity is not supported by any measured viscoelastic property.

Significance. If the qualitative trends are correct after correcting units, this study provides a systematic experimental dataset for high-viscosity shear-thinning CMC jets in a relatively unexplored low-flow-rate regime. The parametric coverage of concentration, needle diameter, and flow rate, with three repetitions and a documented image-processing pipeline, is a useful contribution. However, the paper's quantitative claims (Ohnesorge numbers, breakup times, droplet periods) are compromised by unit errors, and the central causal claim that elasticity governs the dynamics is unsupported because no elastic modulus, extensional viscosity, or relaxation time is measured. The dimensionless numbers and regime classification must be recomputed, and the elasticity attribution requires direct rheological evidence or a matched-viscosity Newtonian control.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, Table 2] The Ohnesorge numbers reported in Table 2 (578–14295) are not dimensionless. Using SI units with μ expressed in Pa·s, ρ = 1066 kg/m^3, σ ≈ 0.06–0.07 N/m, and D_n = 1 mm gives Oh ≈ 0.6–14, a factor of 1000 smaller. The text uses these values to classify the breakup regime (dripping at Oh ~ 500 versus Rayleigh at Oh ~ 10^4), so the regime interpretation as stated is invalid. The authors must recompute all dimensionless numbers with consistent units and re-evaluate which regime each concentration corresponds to.
  2. [Section 3, Figure 5 and text after it] The time labels in Figure 5 and the cited detachment times (about 140 s for 1% CMC, and up to 190 s in the panels) are physically inconsistent with the stated flow rate Q = 8.334 × 10^-8 m^3/s. A droplet emerging for 90 s would contain about 7.5 mL, and for 190 s about 15.8 mL, which is impossible for a 1 mm needle. The times must be in milliseconds; if so, the caption, the text, and all time-dependent quantities (including T_p in Figure 7) must be corrected to milliseconds and the associated claims re-examined.
  3. [Section 3, Figures 6–9, and Section 4] The central causal claim that 'elastic stresses' and the 'elastic nature' of CMC solutions drive the delayed breakup, extended threads, and upward satellite motion is not supported by any measured viscoelastic quantity. Equation (1) is a purely viscous Carreau-Yasuda model; its parameter λ is a time constant for the shear-thinning transition, not a polymer relaxation time. The observed trends could be explained by the increase in zero-shear viscosity (from 158 to 3552 mPa·s) and the decrease in the flow index alone. To substantiate the elasticity claim, the authors need direct measurements such as small-amplitude oscillatory shear moduli, extensional viscosity or relaxation time from a capillary breakup rheometer, or a matched-viscosity purely viscous control fluid.
  4. [Section 3, Figure 7] Figure 7 shows that the droplet period T_p decreases from 1% to 2% CMC and then increases at 3% CMC. This non-monotonic behavior is not reconciled with the abstract's statement that increasing concentration leads to 'prolonged jet lifetimes.' The authors should explain the initial decrease (for example, as a transition from dripping to Rayleigh regime) and clarify whether the central claim applies strictly or only above a threshold concentration.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2] There is a duplicated paragraph describing solution preparation and syringe pump use; one copy should be removed.
  2. [Figure 6 caption] The spatial labels x0 and xn in the inset of Figure 6 are not defined; please explain them in the caption.
  3. [Section 3, Figure 6 discussion] The sentence 'The time scale on the vertical axis in Figure 6 supports viscosity measurements and variations in λ' is unclear and should be rephrased to state what is actually shown.
  4. [Section 2 and Table 2] Numerical values of surface tension are not reported in the text; please provide them (with uncertainty) in Table 1 or Table 2, and state the units used for density and viscosity in all dimensionless-number calculations.
  5. [Table 1] The term 'relaxation time' for λ is misleading; the Carreau-Yasuda time constant is not a viscoelastic relaxation time. Please rename it to 'Carreau-Yasuda time constant' throughout.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: an experimental parametric study whose rheological characterization does not predetermine the measured breakup outcome.

full rationale

The paper is an experimental study and does not derive a target quantity from a model fitted to that same quantity. The Carreau-Yasuda parameters (µ0, λ, n) in Eq. 1 and Table 1 are obtained independently from rotational rheometry and used only to characterize the fluids; the reported jet lengths, thread lengths, droplet volumes, and breakup times are measured from high-speed shadowgraphy and image processing, not computed from those fitted parameters. The central observation that higher CMC concentration yields longer threads, delayed pinch-off, and different droplet morphologies is therefore not forced by construction. The causal attribution of these effects to 'elastic stresses' or 'elastic nature' is a scientific interpretation, and the skeptical objection that no elastic modulus or extensional viscosity was measured, so that the shear-thinning Carreau-Yasuda λ cannot itself certify elasticity, is a correctness or evidence gap rather than a circularity: the explanation is under-supported, not defined in terms of the outcome. Likewise, the apparent unit error in the reported Ohnesorge numbers and the inconsistent time labels in Figure 5 are quantitative reliability concerns, not circular reasoning. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing argument reduces to a self-citation. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claims rest on the interpretation of CMC solutions as viscoelastic and on the accuracy of the measured time and volume data. No new entities are introduced. The free parameters are the Carreau-Yasuda rheological fits, which are used only for fluid characterization. The load-bearing assumptions are that the solutions are genuinely elastic and that the reported timescales are correctly labeled, both of which are problematic.

free parameters (9)
  • Zero-shear viscosity µ0 (1 wt% CMC) = 158.0 mPa·s
    Fitted to rotational rheometer viscosity-shear rate data using the Carreau-Yasuda model (Eq. 1).
  • Zero-shear viscosity µ0 (2 wt% CMC) = 2129.7 mPa·s
    Fitted to rheometry data via Carreau-Yasuda fit (Eq. 1).
  • Zero-shear viscosity µ0 (3 wt% CMC) = 3551.8 mPa·s
    Fitted to rheometry data via Carreau-Yasuda fit (Eq. 1).
  • Carreau-Yasuda time constant λ (1 wt% CMC) = 0.021 s
    Fitted parameter in Eq. 1, incorrectly described in the paper as a relaxation time.
  • Carreau-Yasuda time constant λ (2 wt% CMC) = 0.191 s
    Fitted parameter in Eq. 1, incorrectly described in the paper as a relaxation time.
  • Carreau-Yasuda time constant λ (3 wt% CMC) = 0.314 s
    Fitted parameter in Eq. 1, incorrectly described in the paper as a relaxation time.
  • Flow index n (1 wt% CMC) = 0.398
    Fitted exponent in Eq. 1 quantifying shear-thinning.
  • Flow index n (2 wt% CMC) = 0.374
    Fitted exponent in Eq. 1 quantifying shear-thinning.
  • Flow index n (3 wt% CMC) = 0.286
    Fitted exponent in Eq. 1 quantifying shear-thinning.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption CMC solutions behave as viscoelastic liquids whose breakup is governed by elastic stresses.
    No elastic modulus, relaxation time, or extensional viscosity is measured. The only rheological characterization is a purely viscous shear-thinning fit (Eq. 1 and Table 1).
  • ad hoc to paper The time constant λ in the Carreau-Yasuda model can be interpreted as a relaxation time relevant to elasticity.
    Eq. 1 is a viscous model; λ sets the shear rate for onset of shear thinning, not polymer relaxation. Table 1 labels it 'relaxation time'.
  • domain assumption Image-processing pipeline yields accurate droplet volumes via axisymmetric revolution of pixel areas.
    No validation against independent volume measurement is provided (Eq. 2).
  • domain assumption Syringe pump delivers a constant, uniform flow rate.
    The pump is calibrated with standard syringe volumes, but no in-situ verification at the needle exit is reported.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Jet breakup dynamics of viscoelastic carboxymethyl cellulose solutions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MTZP5JEE

@misc{pith2026250600516,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Jet breakup dynamics of viscoelastic carboxymethyl cellulose solutions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MTZP5JEE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.00516}
}
abstract

We experimentally investigate the breakup dynamics of viscoelastic jets composed of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) solutions, focusing on the dripping and Rayleigh regimes at low flow rates. By varying the CMC concentration, needle diameter ($D_n$), and flow rate ($Q$), we analyze the effects of elasticity, viscosity, and flow conditions on jet stability and droplet formation. Our results show that increasing CMC concentration enhances viscoelastic effects, leading to prolonged jet lifetimes, extended liquid threads, and modified pinch-off behavior. At higher concentrations, elasticity suppresses capillary-driven instabilities, slowing thinning and facilitating the formation of beaded structures. We observe that the interplay between inertial, capillary, and elastic forces, influenced by CMC concentration, governs the jet length, droplet volume, and breakup time, with needle diameter and flow rate playing a crucial role in jet breakup phenomenon.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.00516 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) A schematic representation of the experimental setup, illustrating the dispensing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Variation of the dynamic viscosity µ (mPa·s) with the shear rate ˙γ for different deionized water and CMC solutions with varying CMC concentration (wt. %). (b) Variation of the surface tension σ (mN/m) of the solution with the CMC concentration (wt. %). CMC (%) µ0 (mPa. s) λ (s) n 0 (deionized water) 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 158.0 0.021 0.398 2.0 2129.7 0.191 0.374 3.0 3551.8 0.314 0.286 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Various image processing steps for droplet boundary detection. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A schematic representation of the droplet volume calculation. The droplet profile [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Temporal evolution of jet breakup dynamics for different deionized water and CMC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Spatio-temporal evolution of a droplet at a symmetric location across different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Variation of the time period (Tp) of droplet occurrence with the CMC (wt. %) concentration. Here, for all values of the CMC (wt. %) concentration, the flow rate (Q) and needle diameter (Dn) are fixed at Q = 8.334 × 10−8 m3/s and Dn = 1 mm. The error bars represent the …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Variation of the (a) liquid thread length ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Variation of the (a) liquid thread length ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nonspherical liquid droplet falling in air

    Agrawal, M., Premlata, A.R., Tripathi, M.K., Karri, B., Sahu, K.C., 2017. Nonspherical liquid droplet falling in air. Phys. Rev. E. 95, 033111

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Shape oscillations of a nonspherical water droplet

    Balla, M., Tripathi, M.K., Sahu, K.C., 2019. Shape oscillations of a nonspherical water droplet. Phys. Rev. E. 99, 023107

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Formation of beads-on-a-string structures during break- up of viscoelastic filaments

    Basaran, O.A., 2010. Formation of beads-on-a-string structures during break- up of viscoelastic filaments. Nat. Phys. 6, 625–631

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    Liquid jet breakup in quiescent atmosphere: A review

    Birouk, M., Lekic, N., 2009. Liquid jet breakup in quiescent atmosphere: A review. At. Sprays 19

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    Formation of liquid drops at an orifice and dynamics of pinch-off in liquid jets

    Borthakur, M.P., Biswas, G., Bandyopadhyay, D., 2017. Formation of liquid drops at an orifice and dynamics of pinch-off in liquid jets. Phys. Rev. E. 96, 013115

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Dynamics of an arched liquid jet under the influence of gravity

    Borthakur, M.P., Biswas, G., Bandyopadhyay, D., Sahu, K.C., 2019. Dynamics of an arched liquid jet under the influence of gravity. Eur. J. Mech. B Fluids 74, 1–9

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Liquid jet in a subsonic gaseous crossflow: Recent progress and remaining challenges

    Broumand, M., Birouk, M., 2016. Liquid jet in a subsonic gaseous crossflow: Recent progress and remaining challenges. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 57, 1–29

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    A computational approach to edge detection

    Canny, J., 1986. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Transac- tions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , 679–698

    work page 1986

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    Effect of orifice size on liquid breakup dynamics and spray characteristics in slinger atomizers

    Chakraborty, A., Sahu, S., Maurya, D., 2022. Effect of orifice size on liquid breakup dynamics and spray characteristics in slinger atomizers. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. A: J. Power Energy 236, 1158–1170. 22

    2022

  2. [10]

    Drop formation dynamics of constant low-viscosity, elastic fluids

    Cooper-White, J.J., Fagan, J.E., Tirtaatmadja, V., Lester, D.R., Boger, D.V., 2002. Drop formation dynamics of constant low-viscosity, elastic fluids. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 106, 29–59

    2002

  3. [11]

    Rheology of non-newtonian fluids: a new flow equation for pseudoplastic systems

    Cross, M.M., 1965. Rheology of non-newtonian fluids: a new flow equation for pseudoplastic systems. J. Colloid Sci. 20, 417–437

    1965

  4. [12]

    Effect of the injection pressure and orifice diameter on the spray characteristics of biodiesel

    Geng, L., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Li, H., 2020. Effect of the injection pressure and orifice diameter on the spray characteristics of biodiesel. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. (Engl. Ed.) 7, 331–339

    2020

  5. [13]

    Newtonian jet stability

    Grant, R.P., Middleman, S., 1966. Newtonian jet stability. AIChE J. 12, 669– 678

    1966

  6. [14]

    Effects of gas viscosity and liquid-to-gas density ratio on liquid jet atomization in crossflow

    Hashemi, M., Shalbaf, S., Jadidi, M., Dolatabadi, A., 2023. Effects of gas viscosity and liquid-to-gas density ratio on liquid jet atomization in crossflow. AIP Adv. 13

    2023

  7. [15]

    Wavelength and frequency of axis-switching phe- nomenon formed over rectangular and elliptical liquid jets

    Jaberi, A., Tadjfar, M., 2019. Wavelength and frequency of axis-switching phe- nomenon formed over rectangular and elliptical liquid jets. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 119, 144–154

    2019

  8. [16]

    Evaluation of orifice inlet geometries on single liquid injectors through cold-flow experiments

    Kiaoulias, D., Travis, T., Moore, J., Risha, G., 2019. Evaluation of orifice inlet geometries on single liquid injectors through cold-flow experiments. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 103, 78–88

    2019

  9. [17]

    Dynamics of jet breakup and the resultant drop size distribution-effect of nozzle size and impingement velocity

    Kirar, P.K., Kumar, N., Sahu, K.C., 2024. Dynamics of jet breakup and the resultant drop size distribution-effect of nozzle size and impingement velocity. Phys. Fluids 36

    2024

  10. [18]

    What deter- mines the drop size in sprays? Phys

    Kooij, S., Sijs, R., Denn, M.M., Villermaux, E., Bonn, D., 2018. What deter- mines the drop size in sprays? Phys. Rev. X 8, 031019

    2018

  11. [19]

    Experimental study of spray characteristics of liquid jets in supersonic crossflow

    Li, C., Li, C., Xiao, F., Li, Q., Zhu, Y., 2019. Experimental study of spray characteristics of liquid jets in supersonic crossflow. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 95, 105426. 23

    2019

  12. [20]

    Drop dynamics on the beads-on-string structure for viscoelastic jets: A numerical study

    Li, J., Fontelos, M.A., 2003. Drop dynamics on the beads-on-string structure for viscoelastic jets: A numerical study. Phys. Fluids 15, 922–937

    2003

  13. [21]

    Break-up of continuous liquid jets: effect of nozzle geometry

    Lopez, B., Soucemarianadin, A., Attan´ e, P., 1999. Break-up of continuous liquid jets: effect of nozzle geometry. J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 43, 145–152. L´ opez-Herrera, J.M., Ga˜ n´ an-Calvo, A.M., 2004. A note on charged capillary jet breakup of conducting liquids: experimen...

    1999

  14. [22]

    Regimes of the length of a laminar liquid jet fragmented by a gas co-flow

    Machicoane, N., Osuna-Orozco, R., Aliseda, A., 2023. Regimes of the length of a laminar liquid jet fragmented by a gas co-flow. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 165, 104475

    2023

  15. [23]

    Axis-switching and breakup of rectangular liquid jets

    Morad, M.R., Nasiri, M., Amini, G., 2020. Axis-switching and breakup of rectangular liquid jets. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 126, 103242

    2020

  16. [24]

    Comparison of the jet breakup and droplet formation between non-Newtonian and Newtonian fluids

    Mousavi, S., Siavashi, M., Bagheri, M., 2023. Comparison of the jet breakup and droplet formation between non-Newtonian and Newtonian fluids. J. Non- Newtonian Fluid Mech. 321, 105093

    2023

  17. [25]

    Numerical and experimental investigations of an air bubble rising in a carreau-yasuda shear- thinning liquid

    Premlata, A.R., Tripathi, M.K., Karri, B., Sahu, K.C., 2017. Numerical and experimental investigations of an air bubble rising in a carreau-yasuda shear- thinning liquid. Phys. Fluids 29, 033103

    2017

  18. [26]

    An experimental investigation on the secondary breakup of carboxymethyl cellulose droplets

    Qian, L., Zhong, X., Zhu, C., Lin, J., 2021. An experimental investigation on the secondary breakup of carboxymethyl cellulose droplets. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 136, 103526

    2021

  19. [27]

    Drop size characteristics of sprays emanating from circular and non-circular orifices in the atomization regime

    Rajesh, K.R., Kulkarni, V., Vankeswaram, S.K., Sakthikumar, R., Deivandren, S., 2023. Drop size characteristics of sprays emanating from circular and non-circular orifices in the atomization regime. J. Aerosol Sci. 174, 106245

    2023

  20. [28]

    Interfacial oscillation of liquid jets discharging from non-circular orifices

    Rajesh, K.R., Sakthikumar, R., Sivakumar, D., 2016. Interfacial oscillation of liquid jets discharging from non-circular orifices. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 87, 1–8. 24

    2016

  21. [29]

    Atomization and other breakup regimes of a liquid jet

    Reitz, R.D., 1978. Atomization and other breakup regimes of a liquid jet. Princeton University

    1978

  22. [30]

    Dynamic breakup of liquid– liquid jets

    Richards, J.R., Lenhoff, A.M., Beris, A.N., 1994. Dynamic breakup of liquid– liquid jets. Phys. Fluids 6, 2640–2655

    1994

  23. [31]

    Breakup of liquid jets from non-circular orifices

    Sharma, P., Fang, T., 2014. Breakup of liquid jets from non-circular orifices. Exp. Fluids 55, 1–17

    2014

  24. [32]

    Drop pinch-off and filament dynamics of wormlike micellar fluids

    Smolka, L.B., Belmonte, A., 2003. Drop pinch-off and filament dynamics of wormlike micellar fluids. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 115, 1–25

    2003

  25. [33]

    Primary breakup of liquid jet—effect of jet velocity profile

    Srinivasan, B., Sinha, A., 2024. Primary breakup of liquid jet—effect of jet velocity profile. Phys. Fluids 36

    2024

  26. [34]

    Dynamics of droplet breakup and formation of satellite droplets in a microfluidic t-junction

    Sun, X., Zhu, C., Fu, T., Ma, Y., Li, H.Z., 2018. Dynamics of droplet breakup and formation of satellite droplets in a microfluidic t-junction. Chem. Eng. Sci. 188, 158–169

    2018

  27. [35]

    Experimental and numerical investigations of the jetting regime, in: IOP Conf

    Tanase, N.O., Rasuceanu, I., Balan, C., 2023. Experimental and numerical investigations of the jetting regime, in: IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., IOP Publishing. p. 012038

    2023

  28. [36]

    Liquid jet breakup for non-circular orifices under low pressures

    Wang, F., Fang, T., 2015. Liquid jet breakup for non-circular orifices under low pressures. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 72, 248–262

    2015

  29. [37]

    Effects of inner bubble on liquid jet breakup

    Wu, Z.W., Zhao, H., Li, W.F., Xu, J.L., Wang, S., Liu, H.F., 2019. Effects of inner bubble on liquid jet breakup. Phys. Fluids 31, 034107. 25

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.