Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 127 references

Not Just $N_e$ $N_e$-more: New Applications for SMC from Ecology to Phylogenies

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The sequentially Markovian coalescent, once used mainly to estimate historical population sizes, has been extended to jointly infer recombination and mutation rate maps, gene flow, selfing and dormancy, structural variants, speciation…

desk verdict A competent, genuinely useful review of SMC extensions beyond Ne, with a small editorial mismatch and some preprint-based recommendations that need flagging. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.00692 v1 pith:JOXXPQRV submitted 2025-05-31 q-bio.PE

David Peede , Trevor Cousins , Arun Durvasula , Anastasia Ignatieva , Toby G. L. Kovacs , Alba Nieto , Emily E. Puckett , Elizabeth T. Chevy This is my paper
classification q-bio.PE
keywords sequentiallyMarkoviancoalescentdemographicinferencegeneflowconservationbiologyARGreconstructionrecombinationratestructuralvariationself-fertilization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that the sequentially Markovian coalescent (SMC) has outgrown its original role as a tool for reconstructing historical effective population sizes ($N_e$). Recent extensions allow joint estimation of recombination and mutation rate variation, self-fertilization and germination rates, migration and admixture, structural variation, and full ancestral recombination graphs. The authors organize these methods into three classes: joint parameter inference, lineage partitioning, and ARG reconstruction. They make the case that ecologists, conservation biologists, and phylogeneticists should adopt these tools, while conceding that much of the validation is simulation-based and may not capture natural sequence complexity.

What carries the argument

The central object is the SMC (more precisely the SMC′) approximation to the coalescent with recombination: a Markov process along the genome in which each local genealogy depends only on the genealogy at the previous position. This Markov property makes the model tractable for hidden Markov model (HMM) inference, with hidden states that are discrete coalescence-time bins and emissions that are the observed homozygous/heterozygous genotypes under an infinite-sites mutation model. A second key mechanism is lineage partitioning, where lineages are assigned to labeled classes (by inversion status, population, or species) and coalescence or recombination events are modulated between classes, enabling inference of migration, gene flow, and structural variation. The review also highlights threading-based ARG inference as a third mechanism that builds on the SMC to reconstruct full genealogical histories.

What would settle it

A benchmark that applies the newer SMC extensions (for example, DoLoReS for structural variants, MiSTI for migration rates, eSMC for selfing) to genomes with independently known ground truth, such as experimental pedigrees, validated inversions, or historically documented admixture events, and finds systematic deviations from the truth would falsify the review's implied recommendation that these methods are ready for field adoption.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the SMC model is a general and tractable probabilistic scaffold for the genealogical history of a sample, and that recent extensions have turned it into a multi-purpose inference engine. Where PSMC and MSMC read only $N_e$ from single or few genomes, methods such as iSMC, eSMC, MSMC-IM, MiSTI, cobraa, DoLoReS, and TRAILS now read recombination maps, mutation rate heterogeneity, mating-system parameters, migration rates, admixture times, structural variant locations, and speciation times from the same kind of sequence data. The review further claims that this broadening makes SMC-based inference relevant to conservation biology, natural history, and phylogenetic analysis, not just human population genetics.

Load-bearing premise

The reviewed methods are assumed to be accurate enough outside simulation settings to guide real biological conclusions; the review itself warns that most are validated only against simulations that may not capture the complexity of natural sequences.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • SMC-based methods can now identify genomic regions of conservation concern, such as low-recombining regions that are vulnerable to linked selection and runs of homozygosity.
  • Structural variants, including inversions that are invisible to read-based approaches, can be detected from single diploid genomes through localized suppression of recombination in inferred genealogies.
  • Migration and admixture times can be estimated from a single diploid sequence or from pairs of genomes, aiding studies of hybridization, introgression, and speciation.
  • Ecological life-history traits such as self-fertilization rate and seed-bank dormancy can be inferred jointly with demographic history, correcting biases in $N_e$ estimates.
  • Ancestral recombination graphs reconstructed under the SMC can be used to study selection, population size changes, and even speciation processes without fossil calibrations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The SMC transition matrix itself could serve as a summary statistic for approximate Bayesian computation to test competing structured demographic models, an idea the review only gestures at.
  • Extending SMC-based methods to accept genotype likelihoods and unphased low-coverage data would open the tools to ancient DNA and non-model organisms, which the review identifies as a desirable future direction.
  • The review implies a shift toward the 'ARG era' in which reconstructed genealogies become the primary data product; a testable consequence is that ARG-based estimators of selection and demography will gradually replace SFS-based approaches for many questions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper is a review of recent extensions to the sequentially Markovian coalescent (SMC) framework, arguing that SMC-based methods are no longer limited to inferring historical effective population sizes. It provides an SMC/SMC′ primer with a formal algorithm, then surveys three classes of extensions: joint parameter inference (recombination rate, mutation rate, selfing, dormancy, selection), lineage partitioning (inversions, population structure, isolation-with-migration, multi-species coalescent, speciation), and ARG-based inference (ARGweaver, SINGER, Relate, tsinfer, ARG-Needle, Threads). It closes with empirical considerations, data requirements, and future directions. The central claim is that the SMC is now applicable to gene flow, ecological life-history traits, structural variation, and full ancestral recombination graph inference, and the review is intended to make these developments accessible to ecologists and conservation biologists.

Significance. If its synthesis is accurate, this review provides a useful map of a rapidly moving field and could help non-specialist empiricists select appropriate SMC-based tools. Its strengths include a clear and mostly accurate primer (Section 1 and Algorithm 1), faithful descriptions of the cited methods, and a final section that explicitly acknowledges simulation-based validation limits and the need for users to check implementation choices. The paper is a review rather than a derivation, so the usual equation-level circularity checks do not apply; I found no internally inconsistent technical step. The one discrepancy identified by the stress-test concern, the Abstract's mention of 'inference of dispersal rates' without a supporting section, is real but local and editorial in nature, not a load-bearing flaw in the review's central synthesis.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Section 0] The Abstract and Introduction list 'inference of dispersal rates' among the recent advancements, but no section of the paper actually describes a method for inferring dispersal rates. The closest material is migration and gene-flow inference in Section 3.2 (MSMC-IM, MiSTI, cobraa). The authors should either add a brief discussion of dispersal-rate estimation or revise the list to avoid an unsupported claim.
  2. [Sections 2.1, 3.1, 3.2, and 4] Several highlighted methods are presented as ready-to-use tools without flagging that they are bioRxiv preprints rather than peer-reviewed publications: PSMC+ (Section 2.1), DoLoReS (Section 3.1), MiSTI (Section 3.2), SINGER (Section 4), and Threads (Section 4). Given the target audience of ecologists and conservation biologists, the manuscript should identify preprint status at first mention or include a column in a summary table indicating which tools have been peer-reviewed.
  3. [Acknowledgments] The manuscript does not include a conflict-of-interest statement even though several authors are developers of methods that receive prominent discussion (PSMC+, DoLoReS, cobraa). A competing-interests statement, or at minimum a sentence in the Acknowledgments, would make the review's positionality transparent.
  4. [Section 1.3 and Algorithm 1] Algorithm 1's step 4 states that the right emerging branch re-coalesces 'after a waiting time which is exponentially distributed, with rate proportional to the number of ancestral lineages at each epoch.' This is correct in spirit but could be clearer by specifying that the rate is the coalescent rate i/(2N_e) while the number of ancestral lineages i is constant within each epoch and changes only at coalescence events.
  5. [Figure 1 caption] The caption describes type 1 events as 'not altering the next tree,' which is correct for SMC′ but could confuse readers who recall that the original SMC always produces a new marginal genealogy; a one-sentence reminder that the figure illustrates SMC′ rather than the original SMC would improve clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a descriptive review whose central synthesis is supported by an externally grounded survey of methods, not by a derivation that reduces to its own inputs.

full rationale

This manuscript is a review, not a derivation paper: it does not fit parameters, derive estimators, or claim a new mathematical result, so the equation-level circularity patterns (self-definitional, fitted-input-called-prediction, ansatz-smuggling, uniqueness-importing) do not apply. The central claim that SMC-based methods now target quantities beyond N_e is advanced as a synthesis of a catalog of methods, the large majority of which come from outside the author group (iSMC, MSMC-IM, MiSTI, diCal-ADMIX, ARGweaver, ARGweaver-D, Relate, tsinfer, TRAILS, eSMC/teSMC, SMbetaC, SMC++, etc.). The co-authored works cited (PSMC+, cobraa, DoLoReS, PSMC-based hominin coalescence analysis) are presented as examples among many, and the review's advocacy of them is not the sole or load-bearing evidence for any of its general claims. Section 6 explicitly concedes that validation of the highlighted methods is often simulation-based and that users must validate implementation choices, which further shows the paper is not asserting that its own citations are self-justifying. The one concrete inconsistency, that the Abstract lists 'inference of dispersal rates' while no section describes a dispersal-rate estimator (the closest content is migration and gene-flow inference in Section 3.2), is an editorial mismatch affecting one list item rather than a circular step. No self-citation chain is invoked to forbid alternatives, no uniqueness theorem is imported from author-affiliated prior work, and no empirical result is renamed as a prediction. The honest finding is therefore no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

A review introduces no new model parameters, entities, or fitted quantities. It relies on background assumptions inherited from coalescent theory and on the accuracy of the cited primary literature.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The SMC' approximation is accurate enough for demographic and genealogical inference.
    Invoked throughout Section 1.3 and Algorithm 1; based on McVean and Cardin (2005), Marjoram and Wall (2006), Wilton et al. (2015).
  • domain assumption The neutral Kingman coalescent with random mating and discrete non-overlapping generations is the correct null model for SMC inference.
    Section 1.1 defines the idealized population; Section 2.2 explains selfing and seed banks as violations that must be modeled.
  • standard math HMM forward-backward and Baum-Welch estimation are reliable inference machinery.
    Section 1.4 describes PSMC inference using these algorithms.
  • domain assumption The infinite-sites mutation model underlies emission probabilities.
    Section 1.4 states emission probabilities based on the infinite sites model.
  • domain assumption The review's descriptions of external software behavior are faithful to the primary sources.
    Sections 2-4 summarize dozens of methods; no independent reimplementation or validation was performed; several sources are preprints.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Not Just $N_e$ $N_e$-more: New Applications for SMC from Ecology to Phylogenies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JOXXPQRV

@misc{pith2026250600692,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Not Just $N_e$ $N_e$-more: New Applications for SMC from Ecology to Phylogenies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JOXXPQRV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.00692}
}
read the original abstract

Genomes contain the mutational footprint of an organism's evolutionary history, shaped by diverse forces including ecological factors, selective pressures, and life history traits. The sequentially Markovian coalescent (SMC) is a versatile and tractable model for the genetic genealogy of a sample of genomes, which captures this shared history. Methods that utilize the SMC, such as PSMC and MSMC, have been widely used in evolution and ecology to infer demographic histories. However, these methods ignore common biological features, such as gene flow events and structural variation. Recently, there have been several advancements that widen the applicability of SMC-based methods: inclusion of an isolation with migration model, integration with the multi-species coalescent, incorporation of ecological variables (such as selfing and dormancy), inference of dispersal rates, and many computational advances in applying these models to data. We give an overview of the SMC model and its various recent extensions, discuss examples of biological discoveries through SMC-based inference, and comment on the assumptions, benefits and drawbacks of various methods.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.00692 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of the SMC. (A) Possible types of genealogical transitions due to a recombination event (grey square node g). The “floating” lineage coalesces with one of its ancestral lineages to form the next genealogy along the sequence (see B and C). Type 1 events (sky blue) do not alter the next tree; type 2 events (orange) change the height of the next tree, but not its topology; type 3 events (green) change the … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of PSMC framework. (A) PSMC is a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) used to infer piecewise constant historical population sizes from the spatial distribution of heterozygous sites between two haploid sequences (grey lines on the x-axis plane). Hidden states are discrete intervals of times to the most recent common ancestor (tMRCA), shown as dashed lines on the y-axis plane. Transitions between hidden states represe… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Illustrative example of joint parameter inference. The Hidden Markov Model (HMM) infers both a discretized coalescence time history (vector of τi) and a discretized recombination rate map (vector of ρh and ρl , indicating high and low recombination respectively). Hidden states are tuples of all combinations of coalescence time bins τi and recombination rate bins ρj . An HMM path is depicted underneath the observed d… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustrative example of lineage partitioning. (A) Lineages are partitioned into colored classes (vermilion or blue) where cross-color coales￾cence is restricted until after the barrier (black dashed line) arose. (B) Possible genealogical transitions following a recombi…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

127 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and Gravel, S

    Baharian, S. and Gravel, S. 2018. On the decidability of population size histories from finite allele frequency spectra. Theor. Popul. Biol. , 120 : 42--51

    2018

  2. [2]

    Barroso, G. V. and Dutheil, J. Y. 2023. The landscape of nucleotide diversity in D rosophila melanogaster is shaped by mutation rate variation. Peer Community J. , 3

    2023

  3. [3]

    V., Puzovi\' c , N., and Dutheil, J

    Barroso, G. V., Puzovi\' c , N., and Dutheil, J. Y. 2019. Inference of recombination maps from a single pair of genomes and its application to ancient samples. PLoS Genet. , 15 (11): e1008449

    2019

  4. [4]

    and Song, Y

    Bhaskar, A. and Song, Y. S. 2014. Descartes' rule of signs and the identifiability of population demographic models from genomic variation data. Ann. Stat. , 42 (6): 2469--2493

    2014

  5. [5]

    u hnert, D., De Maio, N., Matschiner, M., Mendes, F. K., M \

    Bouckaert, R., Vaughan, T. G., Barido-Sottani, J., Duch\^ e ne, S., Fourment, M., Gavryushkina, A., Heled, J., Jones, G., K \" u hnert, D., De Maio, N., Matschiner, M., Mendes, F. K., M \" u ller, N. F., Ogilvie, H. A., du Plessis, L., Popinga, A., Rambaut, A., Rasmussen, D., Siveroni, I., Suchard, M. A., Wu, C.-H., Xie, D., Zhang, C., Stadler, T., and Dr...

    2019

  6. [6]

    Y., Huber, C

    Brandt, D. Y., Huber, C. D., Chiang, C. W., and Ortega-Del Vecchyo, D. 2024. The promise of inferring the past using the ancestral recombination graph. Genome Biol. Evol. , 16 (2): evae005

    2024

  7. [7]

    and De Meester, L

    Brendonck, L. and De Meester, L. 2003. Egg banks in freshwater zooplankton: evolutionary and ecological archives in the sediment. Hydrobiologia\/ , 491 (1): 65--84

    2003

  8. [8]

    Charlesworth, B. 2009. Fundamental concepts in genetics: effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation. Nat. Rev. Genet. , 10 (3): 195--205

    2009

Show all 127 references
  1. [9]

    T., and Charlesworth, D

    Charlesworth, B., Morgan, M. T., and Charlesworth, D. 1993a. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics\/ , 134 (4): 1289--1303

  2. [10]

    Charlesworth, B., Morgan, M., and Charlesworth, D. 1993b. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics\/ , 134 (4): 1289--1303

  3. [11]

    Cohen, D. 1966. Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment. J. Theor. Biol. , 12 (1): 119--129

    1966

  4. [12]

    and Durvasula, A

    Cousins, T. and Durvasula, A. 2025. Insufficient evidence for a severe bottleneck in humans during the Early to Middle Pleistocene transition. Mol. Biol. Evol. , 42 (2): msaf041

    2025

  5. [13]

    Cousins, T., Tabin, D., Patterson, N., Reich, D., and Durvasula, A. 2024a. Accurate inference of population history in the presence of background selection. bioRxiv\/ . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.18.576291

    2024 doi

  6. [14]

    Cousins, T., Schweiger, R., and Durbin, R. 2024b. Deep coalescent history of the hominin lineage. bioRxiv\/ . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.17.618932

    2024 doi

  7. [15]

    Cousins, T., Scally, A., and Durbin, R. 2025. A structured coalescent model reveals deep ancestral structure shared by all modern humans. Nat. Genet. , pages 1--9

    2025

  8. [16]

    E., Balcazar, D., Redmond, S., Rose, N

    Crawford, J. E., Balcazar, D., Redmond, S., Rose, N. H., Youd, H. A., Lucas, E. R., Sudirman Made Ali, R., Alnazawi, A., Badolo, A., Chen, C.-H., Cosme, L. V., Henke, J. A., Hung, K. Y., Kluh, S., Liu, W.-L., Maringer, K., Micieli, M. V., Pless, E., Sombi \'e , A., Surendran, ...

    2024

  9. [17]

    A., Fontaine, M

    Crossman, C. A., Fontaine, M. C., and Frasier, T. R. 2024. A comparison of genomic diversity and demographic history of the North Atlantic and Southwest Atlantic southern right whales. Mol. Ecol. , 33 (20): e17099

    2024

  10. [18]

    Cui, R., Wu, J., Yan, K., Luo, S., Hu, Y., Feng, W., Lu, B., and Wang, J. 2024. Phased genome assemblies reveal haplotype-specific genetic load in the critically endangered Chinese Bahaba (Teleostei, Sciaenidae). Mol. Ecol. , 33 (4): e17250

    2024

  11. [19]

    R., Campos, P

    da Fonseca, R. R., Campos, P. F., Rey-Iglesia, A., Barroso, G. V., Bergeron, L. A., Nande, M., Tuya, F., Abidli, S., P\' e rez, M., Riveiro, I., Carrera, P., Jurado-Ruzafa, A., G. Santamar\' a, M. T., Faria, R., Machado, A. M., Fonseca, M. M., Froufe, E., and C. Castro, L. F. ...

    2024

  12. [20]

    J., Peede, D., Coughlan, J

    Dagilis, A. J., Peede, D., Coughlan, J. M., Jofre, G. I., D'Agostino, E. R. R., Mavengere, H., Tate, A. D., and Matute, D. R. 2022. A need for standardized reporting of introgression: Insights from studies across eukaryotes. Evol. Lett. , 6 (5): 344--357

    2022

  13. [21]

    S., and Nielsen, R

    Deng, Y., Song, Y. S., and Nielsen, R. 2021. The distribution of waiting distances in ancestral recombination graphs. Theor. Popul. Biol. , 141 : 34--43

    2021

  14. [22]

    Deng, Y., Nielsen, R., and Song, Y. S. 2024. Robust and accurate bayesian inference of genome-wide genealogies for large samples. bioRxiv\/ . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.16.585351

    2024 doi

  15. [23]

    Deng, Y., Nielsen, R., and Song, Y. S. 2025. A previously reported bottleneck in human ancestry 900 kya is likely a statistical artifact. Genetics\/ , 229 (1): 1--3

    2025

  16. [24]

    R., Krogh, A., and Mitchison, G

    Durbin, R., Eddy, S. R., Krogh, A., and Mitchison, G. 1998. Biological Sequence Analysis : Probabilistic Models of Proteins and Nucleic Acids \/ . Cambridge University Press

    1998

  17. [25]

    M., Alacakaptan, S

    Durvasula, A., Fulgione, A., Gutaker, R. M., Alacakaptan, S. I., Flood, P. J., Neto, C., Tsuchimatsu, T., Burbano, H. A., Pic\' o , F. X., Alonso-Blanco, C., and Hancock, A. M. 2017. African genomes illuminate the early history and transition to selfing in Arabidopsis thaliana...

    2017

  18. [26]

    Dutheil, J. Y. 2024. On the estimation of genome-average recombination rates. Genetics\/ , 227 (2): iyae051

    2024

  19. [27]

    Y., Ganapathy, G., Hobolth, A., Mailund, T., Uyenoyama, M

    Dutheil, J. Y., Ganapathy, G., Hobolth, A., Mailund, T., Uyenoyama, M. K., and Schierup, M. H. 2009. Ancestral population genomics: the coalescent hidden Markov model approach. Genetics\/ , 183 (1): 259--274

    2009

  20. [28]

    A., Matthey-Doret, R., Gouy, A., and Sousa, V

    Excoffier, L., Marchi, N., Marques, D. A., Matthey-Doret, R., Gouy, A., and Sousa, V. C. 2021. fastsimcoal2 : demographic inference under complex evolutionary scenarios. Bioinformatics\/ , 37 (24): 4882--4885

    2021

  21. [29]

    Felsenstein, J. 1973. Maximum likelihood and minimum-steps methods for estimating evolutionary trees from data on discrete characters. Syst. Biol. , 22 (3): 240--249

    1973

  22. [30]

    Felsenstein, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. , 17 (6): 368--376

    1981

  23. [31]

    Griffiths, R. 1991. The two-locus ancestral graph. Lect. Notes Monogr. Ser. , 18 : 100--117

    1991

  24. [32]

    and Marjoram, P

    Griffiths, R. and Marjoram, P. 1996. Ancestral Inference from Samples of DNA Sequences with Recombination . J. Comput. Biol. , 3 (4): 479--502

    1996

  25. [33]

    Griffiths, R. C. and Marjoram, P. 1997. An ancestral recombination graph. IMA Vol. Math. Appl. , 87 : 257--270

    1997

  26. [34]

    F., Zhu, J., Zhang, B

    Gunnarsson, \'A . F., Zhu, J., Zhang, B. C., Tsangalidou, Z., Allmont, A., and Palamara, P. F. 2024. A scalable approach for genome-wide inference of ancestral recombination graphs. bioRxiv\/ . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.31.610248

    2024 doi

  27. [35]

    Haller, B. C. and Messer, P. W. 2019. SLiM 3: Forward Genetic Simulations Beyond the Wright–Fisher Model. Mol. Biol. Evol. , 36 (3): 632--637

    2019

  28. [36]

    A., and Song, Y

    Harris, K., Sheehan, S., Kamm, J. A., and Song, Y. S. 2014. Decoding coalescent hidden Markov models in linear time. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. , 8394 : 100--114

    2014

  29. [37]

    Hein, J., Schierup, M., and Wiuf, C. 2004. Gene genealogies, variation and evolution: A primer in coalescent theory\/ . Oxford University Press, USA

    2004

  30. [38]

    J., Cole, C

    Henderson, D., Zhu, S. J., Cole, C. B., and Lunter, G. 2021. Demographic inference from multiple whole genomes using a particle filter for continuous Markov jump processes. PLoS One\/ , 16 (3): e0247647

    2021

  31. [39]

    Hilgers, L., Liu, S., Jensen, A., Brown, T., Cousins, T., Schweiger, R., Guschanski, K., and Hiller, M. 2025. Avoidable false PSMC population size peaks occur across numerous studies. Curr. Biol. , 35 (4): 927--930

    2025

  32. [40]

    F., Mailund, T., and Schierup, M

    Hobolth, A., Christensen, O. F., Mailund, T., and Schierup, M. H. 2007. Genomic Relationships and Speciation Times of Human , Chimpanzee , and Gorilla Inferred from a Coalescent Hidden Markov Model . PLoS Genet. , 3 (2): e7

    2007

  33. [41]

    N., and Mailund, T

    Hobolth, A., Andersen, L. N., and Mailund, T. 2011. On Computing the Coalescence Time Density in an Isolation - With - Migration Model With Few Samples . Genetics\/ , 187 (4): 1241--1243

    2011

  34. [42]

    and Siepel, A

    Hubisz, M. and Siepel, A. 2020. Inference of Ancestral Recombination Graphs Using ARGweaver . Methods Mol. Biol. , 2090 : 231--266

    2020

  35. [43]

    J., Williams, A

    Hubisz, M. J., Williams, A. L., and Siepel, A. 2020. Mapping gene flow between ancient hominins through demography-aware inference of the ancestral recombination graph. PLoS Genet. , 16 (8): e1008895

    2020

  36. [44]

    Hudson, R. R. 1983. Properties of a neutral allele model with intragenic recombination. Theor. Popul. Biol. , 23 (2): 183--201

    1983

  37. [45]

    Ignatieva, A., Favero, M., Koskela, J., Sant, J., and Myers, S. R. 2025. The length of haplotype blocks and signals of structural variation in reconstructed genealogies. bioRxiv\/ . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.11.548567

    2025 doi

  38. [46]

    Kamm, J., Terhorst, J., Durbin, R., and Song, Y. S. 2020. Efficiently Inferring the Demographic History of Many Populations With Allele Count Data . J. Am. Stat. Assoc. , 115 (531): 1472--1487

    2020

  39. [47]

    W., Fadil, C., Albers, P

    Kelleher, J., Wong, Y., Wohns, A. W., Fadil, C., Albers, P. K., and McVean, G. 2019. Inferring whole-genome histories in large population datasets. Nat. Genet. , 51 (9): 1330--1338

    2019

  40. [48]

    and Terhorst, J

    Ki, C. and Terhorst, J. 2023. Exact Decoding of a Sequentially Markov Coalescent Model in Genetics. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. , pages 1--14

    2023

  41. [49]

    Kingman, J. F. C. 1980. Mathematics of genetic diversity\/ . Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, USA

    1980

  42. [50]

    Kingman, J. F. C. 1982a. The coalescent. Stochastic Process. Appl. , 13 (3): 235--248

  43. [51]

    Kingman, J. F. C. 1982b. On the genealogy of large populations. J. Appl. Probab. , 19 (A): 27--43

  44. [52]

    Korfmann, K., Sellinger, T. P. P., Freund, F., Fumagalli, M., and Tellier, A. 2024. Simultaneous Inference of Past Demography and Selection from the Ancestral Recombination Graph under the Beta Coalescent . Peer Community J. , 4

    2024

  45. [53]

    S., Albrechtsen, A., and Nielsen, R

    Korneliussen, T. S., Albrechtsen, A., and Nielsen, R. 2014. ANGSD : Analysis of next generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics\/ , 15 (1): 356

    2014

  46. [54]

    T., den Hollander, F., Wilke-Berenguer, M., and Blath, J

    Lennon, J. T., den Hollander, F., Wilke-Berenguer, M., and Blath, J. 2021. Principles of seed banks and the emergence of complexity from dormancy. Nat. Commun. , 12 (1): 4807

    2021

  47. [55]

    L., Ram\' rez-Chaves, H

    Lescroart, J., Bonilla-S\' a nchez, A., Napolitano, C., Buitrago-Torres, D. L., Ram\' rez-Chaves, H. E., Pulido-Santacruz, P., Murphy, W. J., Svardal, H., and Eizirik, E. 2023. Extensive Phylogenomic Discordance and the Complex Evolutionary History of the Neotropical Cat Genus...

    2023

  48. [56]

    Lesturgie, P. e. a. 2022. Coalescence times, life history traits and conservation concerns: An example from four coastal shark species from the Indo-Pacific. Mol. Ecol. Resour. , 22 (2): 554--566

    2022

  49. [57]

    L., Grundler, M

    Lewanski, A. L., Grundler, M. C., and Bradburd, G. S. 2024. The era of the ARG : A n introduction to ancestral recombination graphs and their significance in empirical evolutionary genomics. PLoS Genet. , 20 (1): e1011110

    2024

  50. [58]

    and Durbin, R

    Li, H. and Durbin, R. 2011. Inference of human population history from individual whole-genome sequences. Nature\/ , 475 (7357): 493--496

    2011

  51. [59]

    and Stephens, M

    Li, N. and Stephens, M. 2003. Modeling linkage disequilibrium and identifying recombination hotspots using single-nucleotide polymorphism data. Genetics\/ , 165 (4): 2213--2233

    2003

  52. [60]

    and Hansen, M

    Liu, S. and Hansen, M. M. 2017. PSMC (pairwise sequentially Markovian coalescent) analysis of RAD (restriction site associated DNA) sequencing data. Mol. Ecol. Resour. , 17 (4): 631--641

    2017

  53. [61]

    and Fu, Y.-X

    Liu, X. and Fu, Y.-X. 2020. Stairway Plot 2: demographic history inference with folded SNP frequency spectra. Genome Biol. , 21 (1): 280

    2020

  54. [62]

    Y., Hobolth, A., Lunter, G., and Schierup, M

    Mailund, T., Dutheil, J. Y., Hobolth, A., Lunter, G., and Schierup, M. H. 2011. Estimating divergence time and ancestral effective population size of Bornean and Sumatran orangutan subspecies using a coalescent hidden Markov model. PLoS Genet. , 7 (3): e1001319

    2011

  55. [63]

    E., Westergaard, M., Dutheil, J

    Mailund, T., Halager, A. E., Westergaard, M., Dutheil, J. Y., Munch, K., Andersen, L. N., Lunter, G., Pr \" u fer, K., Scally, A., Hobolth, A., and Schierup, M. H. 2012. A new isolation with migration model along complete genomes infers very different divergence processes amon...

    2012

  56. [64]

    C., Muller, C., Sousa, V

    Malaspinas, A.-S., Westaway, M. C., Muller, C., Sousa, V. C., Lao, O., Alves, I., Bergstr\" o m, A., Athanasiadis, G., Cheng, J. Y., Crawford, J. E., Heupink, T. H., Macholdt, E., Peischl, S., Rasmussen, S., Schiffels, S., Subramanian, S., Wright, J. L., Albrechtsen, A., Barbi...

    2016

  57. [65]

    n., Patterson, N., and Reich, D

    Mallick, S., Micco, A., Mah, M., Ringbauer, H., Lazaridis, I., Olalde, I. n., Patterson, N., and Reich, D. 2024. The Allen Ancient DNA Resource ( AADR ) a curated compendium of ancient human genomes. Sci. Data\/ , 11 (1): 182

    2024

  58. [66]

    coalescent

    Marjoram, P. and Wall, J. D. 2006. Fast "coalescent" simulation. BMC Genet. , 7 (1): 1--9

    2006

  59. [67]

    Mazet, O., Rodr\' guez, W., Grusea, S., Boitard, S., and Chikhi, L. 2016. On the importance of being structured: instantaneous coalescence rates and human evolution--lessons for ancestral population size inference? Heredity\/ , 116 (4): 362--371

    2016

  60. [68]

    McKenzie, P. F. and Eaton, D. A. 2022. Estimating waiting distances between genealogy changes under a multi-species extension of the sequentially M arkov coalescent. bioRxiv\/ , pages 2022--08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.19.504573

    2022 doi

  61. [69]

    McVean, G. A. and Cardin, N. J. 2005. Approximating the coalescent with recombination. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. , 360 (1459): 1387--1393

    2005

  62. [70]

    Myers, S., Fefferman, C., and Patterson, N. 2008. Can one learn history from the allelic spectrum? Theor. Popul. Biol. , 73 (3): 342--348

    2008

  63. [71]

    Nadachowska-Brzyska, K. e. a. 2016. PSMC analysis of effective population sizes in molecular ecology and its application to black-and-white Ficedula flycatchers. Mol. Ecol. , 25 (5): 1058--1072

    2016

  64. [72]

    H., and Deng, Y

    Nielsen, R., Vaughn, A. H., and Deng, Y. 2024. Inference and applications of ancestral recombination graphs. Nat. Rev. Genet. , pages 1--12

    2024

  65. [73]

    Nordborg, M. 2000. Linkage disequilibrium, gene trees and selfing: an ancestral recombination graph with partial self-fertilization. Genetics\/ , 154 (2): 923--929

    2000

  66. [74]

    Nordborg, M., Charlesworth, B., and Charlesworth, D. 1996. The effect of recombination on background selection. Genet. Res. , 67 (2): 159--174

    1996

  67. [75]

    H., Portinha, B., Sousa, V

    Nouhaud, P., Martin, S. H., Portinha, B., Sousa, V. C., and Kulmuni, J. 2022. Rapid and predictable genome evolution across three hybrid ant populations. PLoS Biol. , 20 (12): e3001914

    2022

  68. [76]

    A., Wakeley, J., and Ramachandran, S

    Palacios, J. A., Wakeley, J., and Ramachandran, S. 2015. Bayesian nonparametric inference of population size changes from sequential genealogies. Genetics\/ , 201 (1): 281--304

    2015

  69. [77]

    F., Terhorst, J., Song, Y

    Palamara, P. F., Terhorst, J., Song, Y. S., and Price, A. L. 2018. High-throughput inference of pairwise coalescence times identifies signals of selection and enriched disease heritability. Nat. Genet. , 50 (9): 1311--1317

    2018

  70. [78]

    Parag, K. V. and Pybus, O. G. 2019. Robust design for coalescent model inference. Syst. Biol. , 68 (5): 730--743

    2019

  71. [79]

    Patton, A. H. e. a. 2019. Contemporary Demographic Reconstruction Methods Are Robust to Genome Assembly Quality: A Case Study in Tasmanian Devils. Mol. Biol. Evol. , 36 (12): 2906--2921

    2019

  72. [80]

    Paul, J. S. and Song, Y. S. 2010. A principled approach to deriving approximate conditional sampling distributions in population genetics models with recombination. Genetics\/ , 186 (1): 321--338

    2010

  73. [81]

    S., Steinr \" u cken, M., and Song, Y

    Paul, J. S., Steinr \" u cken, M., and Song, Y. S. 2011. An accurate sequentially Markov conditional sampling distribution for the coalescent with recombination. Genetics\/ , 187 (4): 1115--1128

    2011

  74. [82]

    F., and Kirkpatrick, M

    Peischl, S., Koch, E., Guerrero, R. F., and Kirkpatrick, M. 2013. A sequential coalescent algorithm for chromosomal inversions. Heredity\/ , 111 (3): 200--209

    2013

  75. [83]

    E., Davis, I

    Puckett, E. E., Davis, I. S., Harper, D. C., Wakamatsu, K., Battu, G., Belant, J. L., Beyer, D. E., Carpenter, C., Crupi, A. P., Davidson, M., DePerno, C. S., Forman, N., Fowler, N. L., Garshelis, D. L., Gould, N., Gunther, K., Haroldson, M., Ito, S., Kocka, D., Lackey, C., Le...

    2023

  76. [84]

    D., Hubisz, M

    Rasmussen, M. D., Hubisz, M. J., Gronau, I., and Siepel, A. 2014. Genome-wide inference of ancestral recombination graphs. PLoS Genet. , 10 (5): e1004342

    2014

  77. [85]

    H., Wakeley, J., and Hobolth, A

    Rivas-Gonz\' a lez, I., Schierup, M. H., Wakeley, J., and Hobolth, A. 2024. TRAILS : Tree reconstruction of ancestry using incomplete lineage sorting. PLoS Genet. , 20 (2): e1010836

    2024

  78. [86]

    A., Bowie, R

    Robinson, J. A., Bowie, R. C., Dudchenko, O., Aiden, E. L., Hendrickson, S. L., Steiner, C. C., Ryder, O. A., Mindell, D. P., and Wall, J. D. 2021. Genome-wide diversity in the California condor tracks its prehistoric abundance and decline. Curr. Biol. , 31 (13): 2939--2946.e5

    2021

  79. [87]

    L., Darling, A., H \" o hna, S., Larget, B., Liu, L., Suchard, M

    Ronquist, F., Teslenko, M., van der Mark, P., Ayres, D. L., Darling, A., H \" o hna, S., Larget, B., Liu, L., Suchard, M. A., and Huelsenbeck, J. P. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. , 61 (3): 539--542

    2012

  80. [88]

    H., Badolo, A., Sylla, M., Akorli, J., Otoo, S., Gloria-Soria, A., Powell, J

    Rose, N. H., Badolo, A., Sylla, M., Akorli, J., Otoo, S., Gloria-Soria, A., Powell, J. R., White, B. J., Crawford, J. E., and McBride, C. S. 2023. Dating the origin and spread of specialization on human hosts in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. eLife\/ , 12 : e83524

    2023

  81. [89]

    Rosen, Z., Bhaskar, A., Roch, S., and Song, Y. S. 2018. Geometry of the sample frequency spectrum and the perils of demographic inference. Genetics\/ , 210 (2): 665--682

    2018

  82. [90]

    F., Saura, M., Wang, J., and Caballero, A

    Santiago, E., Novo, I., Pardi\ n as, A. F., Saura, M., Wang, J., and Caballero, A. 2020. Recent Demographic History Inferred by High-Resolution Analysis of Linkage Disequilibrium. Mol. Biol. Evol. , 37 (12): 3642--3653

    2020

  83. [91]

    and Durbin, R

    Schiffels, S. and Durbin, R. 2014. Inferring human population size and separation history from multiple genome sequences. Nat. Genet. , 46 (8): 919--925

    2014

  84. [92]

    and Durbin, R

    Schweiger, R. and Durbin, R. 2023. Ultrafast genome-wide inference of pairwise coalescence times. Genome Res. , 33 (7): 1023--1031

    2023

  85. [93]

    o ssel, N., M\

    Schweizer, G., Haider, M. B., Barroso, G. V., R\" o ssel, N., M\" u nch, K., Kahmann, R., and Dutheil, J. Y. 2021. Population Genomics of the Maize Pathogen Ustilago maydis: Demographic History and Role of Virulence Clusters in Adaptation. Genome Biol. Evol. , 13 (5): evab073

    2021

  86. [94]

    Sellinger, T., Johannes, F., and Tellier, A. 2024. Improved inference of population histories by integrating genomic and epigenomic data. eLife\/ , 12 : Rp89470

    2024

  87. [95]

    Sellinger, T. P. P., Awad, D. A., Moest, M., and Tellier, A. 2020. Inference of past demography, dormancy and self-fertilization rates from whole genome sequence data. PLoS Genet. , 16 (4): e1008698

    2020

  88. [96]

    Sellinger, T. P. P., Abu-Awad, D., and Tellier, A. 2021. Limits and convergence properties of the sequentially Markovian coalescent. Mol. Ecol. Resour. , 21 (7): 2231--2248

    2021

  89. [97]

    M., Lorenzo-Salazar, J

    Serradell, J. M., Lorenzo-Salazar, J. M., Flores, C., Lao, O., and Comas, D. 2024. Modelling the demographic history of human North African genomes points to a recent soft split divergence between populations. Genome Biol. , 25 (1): 201

    2024

  90. [98]

    Shchur, V., Brandt, D. Y. C., Ilina, A., and Nielsen, R. 2022. Estimating population split times and migration rates from historical effective population sizes. bioRxiv\/ , page 2022.06.17.496540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.17.496540

    2022 doi

  91. [99]

    Sheehan, S., Harris, K., and Song, Y. S. 2013. Estimating variable effective population sizes from multiple genomes: a sequentially markov conditional sampling distribution approach. Genetics\/ , 194 (3): 647--662

    2013

  92. [100]

    Speidel, L., Forest, M., Shi, S., and Myers, S. R. 2019. A method for genome-wide genealogy estimation for thousands of samples. Nat. Genet. , 51 (9): 1321--1329

    2019

  93. [101]

    S., and Song, Y

    Steinr \" u cken, M., Paul, J. S., and Song, Y. S. 2013. A sequentially Markov conditional sampling distribution for structured populations with migration and recombination. Theor. Popul. Biol. , 87 : 51--61

    2013

  94. [102]

    P., Kamm, J

    Steinr \" u cken, M., Spence, J. P., Kamm, J. A., Wieczorek, E., and Song, Y. S. 2018. Model-based detection and analysis of introgressed Neanderthal ancestry in modern humans. Mol. Ecol. , 27 (19): 3873--3888

    2018

  95. [103]

    P., and Song, Y

    Steinr \" u cken, M., Kamm, J., Spence, J. P., and Song, Y. S. 2019. Inference of complex population histories using whole-genome sequences from multiple populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. , 116 (34): 17115--17120

    2019

  96. [104]

    J., Wilton, P

    Stern, A. J., Wilton, P. R., and Nielsen, R. 2019. An approximate full-likelihood method for inferring selection and allele frequency trajectories from DNA sequence data. PLoS Genet. , 15 (9): e1008384

    2019

  97. [105]

    Str\" u tt, S., Sellinger, T., Gl\' e min, S., Tellier, A., and Laurent, S. 2023. Joint inference of evolutionary transitions to self-fertilization and demographic history using whole-genome sequences. eLife\/ , 12 : e82384

    2023

  98. [106]

    u ler, T., Hublin, J.-J., Velem\' nsk\' y , P., Br u z ek, J., Peter, B. M., Meyer, M., Meller, H., Ringbauer, H., Hajdinjak, M., Pr\

    S\" u mer, A. P., Rougier, H., Villalba-Mouco, V., Huang, Y., Iasi, L. N. M., Essel, E., Mesa, A. B., Furtwaengler, A., Peyr\' e gne, S., De Filippo, C., Rohrlach, A. B., Pierini, F., Mafessoni, F., Fewlass, H., Zavala, E. I., Mylopotamitaki, D., Bianco, R. A., Schmidt, A., Zo...

    2025

  99. [107]

    and Song, Y

    Terhorst, J. and Song, Y. S. 2015. Fundamental limits on the accuracy of demographic inference based on the sample frequency spectrum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. , 112 (25): 7677--7682

    2015

  100. [108]

    Terhorst, J., Schl\" o tterer, C., and Song, Y. S. 2015. Multi-locus Analysis of Genomic Time Series Data from Experimental Evolution . PLoS Genet. , 11 (4): e1005069

    2015

  101. [109]

    A., and Song, Y

    Terhorst, J., Kamm, J. A., and Song, Y. S. 2017. Robust and scalable inference of population history from hundreds of unphased whole genomes. Nat. Genet. , 49 (2): 303--309

    2017

  102. [110]

    E., Blanco-Bercial, L., Eriksen, E., Meyer, B., and Wallberg, A

    Unneberg, P., Larsson, M., Olsson, A., Wallerman, O., Petri, A., Bunikis, I., Vinnere Pettersson , O., Papetti, C., Gislason, A., Glenner, H., Cartes, J. E., Blanco-Bercial, L., Eriksen, E., Meyer, B., and Wallberg, A. 2024. Ecological genomics in the Northern krill uncovers l...

    2024

  103. [111]

    and Steinr \" u cken, M

    Upadhya, G. and Steinr \" u cken, M. 2022. Robust inference of population size histories from genomic sequencing data. PLoS Comput. Biol. , 18 (9): e1010419

    2022

  104. [112]

    Vaughn, A. H. and Nielsen, R. 2024. Fast and accurate estimation of selection coefficients and allele histories from ancient and modern DNA . Mol. Biol. Evol. , 41 (8): msae156

    2024

  105. [113]

    T., Donaldson, M

    Vila c a, S. T., Donaldson, M. E., Benazzo, A., Wheeldon, T. J., Vizzari, M. T., Bertorelle, G., Patterson, B. R., and Kyle, C. J. 2023. Tracing Eastern Wolf Origins From Whole-Genome Data in Context of Extensive Hybridization. Mol. Biol. Evol. , 40 (4): msad055

    2023

  106. [114]

    Wakeley, J. 2008. Coalescent Theory : An Introduction \/ . W. H. Freeman, USA, Greenwood Village

    2008

  107. [115]

    Wang, K., Mathieson, I., O'Connell, J., and Schiffels, S. 2020. Tracking human population structure through time from whole genome sequences. PLoS Genet. , 16 (3): e1008552

    2020

  108. [116]

    Wang, M.-S., Murray, G. G. R., Mann, D., Groves, P., Vershinina, A. O., Supple, M. A., Kapp, J. D., Corbett-Detig, R., Crump, S. E., Stirling, I., Laidre, K. L., Kunz, M., Dal\' e n, L., Green, R. E., and Shapiro, B. 2022. A polar bear paleogenome reveals extensive ancient gen...

    2022

  109. [117]

    H., Mathieson, I., and Mathieson, S

    Wang, Z., Wang, J., Kourakos, M., Hoang, N., Lee, H. H., Mathieson, I., and Mathieson, S. 2021. Automatic inference of demographic parameters using generative adversarial networks. Mol. Ecol. Resour. , 21 (8): 2689--2705

    2021

  110. [118]

    A., and Tellier, A

    Wei, K., Silva-Arias, G. A., and Tellier, A. 2023. Selective sweeps linked to the colonization of novel habitats and climatic changes in a wild tomato species. New Phytol. , 237 (5): 1908--1921

    2023

  111. [119]

    R., Carmi, S., and Hobolth, A

    Wilton, P. R., Carmi, S., and Hobolth, A. 2015. The SMC ' is a highly accurate approximation to the ancestral recombination graph. Genetics\/ , 200 (1): 343--355

    2015

  112. [120]

    and Hein, J

    Wiuf, C. and Hein, J. 1999a. The ancestry of a sample of sequences subject to recombination. Genetics\/ , 151 (3): 1217--1228

  113. [121]

    and Hein, J

    Wiuf, C. and Hein, J. 1999b. Recombination as a Point Process along Sequences . Theor. Popul. Biol. , 55 (3): 248--259

  114. [122]

    W., Wong, Y., Jeffery, B., Akbari, A., Mallick, S., Pinhasi, R., Patterson, N., Reich, D., Kelleher, J., and McVean, G

    Wohns, A. W., Wong, Y., Jeffery, B., Akbari, A., Mallick, S., Pinhasi, R., Patterson, N., Reich, D., Kelleher, J., and McVean, G. 2022. A unified genealogy of modern and ancient genomes. Science\/ , 375 (6583): eabi8264

    2022

  115. [123]

    W., and Kelleher, J

    Wong, Y., Ignatieva, A., Koskela, J., Gorjanc, G., Wohns, A. W., and Kelleher, J. 2024. A general and efficient representation of ancestral recombination graphs. Genetics\/ , 228 (1): iyae100

    2024

  116. [124]

    Yang, X.-Y., Dai, S.-S., Liu, H.-Q., Peng, M.-S., and Zhang, Y.-P. 2018. The uncertainty of population relationship and divergence time inferred by the multiple sequentially Markovian coalescent model. J. Hum. Genet. , 63 (6): 775--777

    2018

  117. [125]

    Yang, Z. 2007. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. , 24 (8): 1586--1591

    2007

  118. [126]

    H., and Nielsen, R

    YC Brandt, D., Wei, X., Deng, Y., Vaughn, A. H., and Nielsen, R. 2022. Evaluation of methods for estimating coalescence times using ancestral recombination graphs. Genetics\/ , 221 (1): iyac044

    2022

  119. [127]

    C., Biddanda, A., Gunnarsson, \'A

    Zhang, B. C., Biddanda, A., Gunnarsson, \'A . F., Cooper, F., and Palamara, P. F. 2023. Biobank-scale inference of ancestral recombination graphs enables genealogical analysis of complex traits. Nat. Genet. , 55 (5): 768--776

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.