Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 52 references

Regularity and pointwise convergence for dispersive equations with asymptotically concave phase on Damek-Ricci spaces

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read On Damek-Ricci spaces, dispersive equations with asymptotically concave phase of degree $a\in(0,1)$ make radial initial data in $H^{\beta}$ converge pointwise for $\beta>a/4$, and the maximal estimate fails for $\beta<a/4$.

desk verdict Solid model-case proof for fractional Schrödinger on Damek-Ricci spaces, but the advertised generality for all asymptotically concave phases depends on an unproved self-cited transference lemma. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.00881 v1 pith:GE5JGICL submitted 2025-06-01 math.AP

Utsav Dewan This is my paper
classification math.AP MSC 35J1043A8522E3043A90
keywords pointwiseconvergencedispersiveequationsDamek-RiccispacesconcavephaseradialfunctionsmaximalestimatesSobolevregularityspherical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies the pointwise-convergence problem for dispersive equations on Damek-Ricci spaces, a family of negatively curved noncompact spaces that includes real hyperbolic spaces. For any equation whose phase function satisfies $\psi(\lambda)=\lambda^a+O(1)$ at large frequencies, with $0a/4$, and that the maximal function $\sup_{0

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the reduction to the model phase $\lambda^a$. A transference principle, Lemma 3.4, says that two phases differing by a bounded amount at high frequency give equivalent local maximal estimates; together with $\psi(\lambda)=\lambda^a+O(1)$, this replaces any asymptotically concave phase by the fractional Schrödinger phase. The geometric part of the argument decomposes the ball $B_R$ into a small ball around the identity, where the spherical function is expanded in Bessel functions, and an annulus, where it is expanded in a Harish-Chandra-type exponential series with controlled coefficients. A Schwartz-correspondence lemma converts the spherical Fourier representation into a Euclidean Bessel integral, and the model case is then finished with an oscillatory-integral estimate and a weighted one-dimensional Fourier inequality.

What would settle it

Attempt to falsify Lemma 3.4 directly: construct two phase functions $\psi_1$ and $\psi_2$ with $|\psi_1(\lambda)-\psi_2(\lambda)|\le C$ for all large $\lambda$ but with genuinely different low-frequency behaviour, and check whether the local $L^2$ maximal estimate for one phase at a Sobolev exponent $\beta_0$ forces the same estimate for the other; a counterexample would shrink the main theorems to the fractional Schrödinger case.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated as Theorems 1.3 and 1.5, is that for radial initial data on a Damek-Ricci space the local maximal operator satisfies $\lVert S_{\psi}^{*}f\rVert_{L^2(B_R)} \lesssim \lVert f\rVert_{H^{\beta}(S)}$ for every $\beta>a/4$, while for $\beta<a/4$ no such estimate holds. As a consequence, Corollary 1.4 gives almost everywhere pointwise convergence of the solution to its radial initial data at the same regularity threshold. This recovers the classical Euclidean threshold for fractional Schrödinger equations with concave phase and extends it to a whole class of phases that are only asymptotically concave, on a curved noncompact setting.

Load-bearing premise

The advertised threshold for every asymptotically concave phase rests on the unproved transference principle of Lemma 3.4, and if that principle fails the self-contained proof covers only the fractional Schrödinger phases, not the full declared class.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every asymptotically concave phase of degree $a\in(0,1)$, radial data in $H^{\beta}$ with $\beta>a/4$ converge almost everywhere to their initial data.
  • For $\beta<a/4$ the local $L^2$ maximal estimate fails, so the regularity threshold is almost sharp, with only the endpoint $\beta=a/4$ left undecided.
  • The result covers the fractional Schrödinger equations with phases $\lambda^a$ and $(\lambda^2+Q^2/4)^{a/2}$ on Damek-Ricci spaces, matching the classical Euclidean concave-phase threshold.
  • The concluding remarks state that exact analogues on $\mathbb{R}^n$ can be obtained by the same method, which would generalize the classical Euclidean results for concave phases beyond the fractional Schrödinger case.
  • The endpoint $\beta=a/4$ remains open, as it does in the Euclidean problem.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The abstract says the result is 'new even for $\mathbb{R}^n$', but the concluding remarks describe the Euclidean analogue as something to be obtained via a transference principle, so that Euclidean claim is not a proved theorem of this paper.
  • Because Lemma 3.4 is only cited, a conservative reading is that this paper proves the $\beta>a/4$ threshold self-containedly for the fractional Schrödinger phase and extends it to all asymptotically concave phases only conditionally.
  • Inserting the Euclidean higher-integrability maximal estimate in place of the $L^2$ estimate used here should yield $L^q$ versions of the local maximal bound on Damek-Ricci spaces; that is a direct testable extension of the proof.
  • The endpoint $\beta=a/4$ is likely to need new ideas: the counterexample family used for sharpness has Sobolev norm of size $N^{\beta-a/4}$, which does not tend to zero at the endpoint, so the usual construction cannot rule out convergence there.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper addresses Carleson's pointwise convergence problem on Damek-Ricci spaces for radial initial data and dispersive equations whose phase satisfies ψ(λ)=λ^a+O(1), a∈(0,1). Its main results are a local L^2 maximal estimate with H^β regularity for β>a/4 (Theorem 1.3) and a necessary counterexample for β<a/4 (Theorem 1.5). The proof for the model phase λ^a is developed in detail using spherical-function expansions, a Schwartz-class correspondence via the Abel transform, and Walther-type oscillatory estimates. The extension to all asymptotically concave phases is delegated to a transference principle (Lemma 3.4) cited from the author's unpublished [De2]. The abstract also claims the result is new for R^n, but Section 6(1) states that the R^n analogue would require an additional transference argument not given here.

Significance. If the transference principle is valid, the threshold β>a/4 is an almost sharp regularity result for a broad class of concave-phase equations and a natural non-Euclidean analogue of Walther's theorem. The model-case proof appears internally coherent and contains useful ingredients: the Bessel-series/Harish-Chandra expansion decomposition, the Lemma 3.6 scaling argument, and the Section 5 counterexample construction. However, the advertised generality for all asymptotically concave phases is not established in this manuscript, because the central reduction rests on an unproved self-cited lemma. The R^n part of the abstract is also not supported by the paper.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2, Lemma 3.4; §4, first paragraph; §5, last paragraph] Lemma 3.4 is load-bearing for the full statements of Theorems 1.3 and 1.5, but it is quoted from the author's [De2] with no proof or proof sketch. The defining condition in Definition 3.2(iii) is only |ψ1(λ)-ψ2(λ)|≤C for λ>Λ. This condition alone does not obviously imply the claimed transfer of H^β-maximal estimates: the multiplier e^{it(ψ1-ψ2)} is bounded on L^2, but to control H^β norms one needs derivative bounds on this multiplier, and condition (1.7) imposes no derivative control on the O(1) term. Thus the reduction of the general asymptotically concave case to the fractional Schrödinger phase λ^a is not justified by the arguments in this paper. I ask the author to either prove Lemma 3.4 with all required hypotheses or restrict the main theorems to the model case. In particular, if the transference principle requires an actual concavity assumption (as Remark 6(2) suggests), then Definition 1.1 should include that hypothesis explicitly.
  2. [Abstract and §6(1)] The abstract states that the result is 'new even for R^n', but Section 6, point (1) says that exact analogues for R^n would require obtaining an analogue of the transference principle (Lemma 3.4) in the Euclidean setting, and no such Euclidean transference result is proved here. The R^n claim is therefore not a consequence of the present paper. The author should correct the abstract and the concluding remarks so that the advertised claims match what is actually proved.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Title page and References] The author name is typeset as 'UTSA V DEW AN' with an unintended space, and the reference [De2] contains the typo 'certian' for 'certain'.
  2. [Definition 1.1 and Remark 6(2)] The term 'asymptotically concave' is used even though Definition 1.1 only imposes ψ(λ)=λ^a+O(1); if actual concavity of the phase is needed for the transference principle, it should be part of the definition.
  3. [Section 6, item (3)] The remark that the endpoint β=a/4 is open in R^n itself is appropriate, but it would be helpful to state explicitly that the main results therefore give only an almost sharp threshold, not an endpoint result.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

General-phase theorems are carried by a load-bearing self-citation: the transfer from the proven fractional Schrödinger model to all asymptotically concave phases is quoted from the author's own [De2] and not proved here.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 3.2, Lemma 3.4 and Section 4, opening paragraph (reduction of Theorem 1.3)]
    "This follows from an abstract local transference principle, obtained by the author in [De2]. ... Lemma 3.4. [De2, Theorem 1.6] Let ψ1 and ψ2 be continuous real-valued functions on [0,∞) such that they are C∞ away from the origin. If the dispersive equations corresponding to ψ1 and ψ2 are of comparable oscillation, then they are also locally transferrable. ..."

    Theorem 1.3 is stated for every asymptotically concave phase, but the only link from that class to the proved fractional-Schrödinger model is Lemma 3.4, quoted verbatim from the author's own [De2, Theorem 1.6] and not proved or sketched here. Definition 3.2(iii) merely records the hypothesis |ψ1−ψ2|≤C for λ>Λ; no argument in this paper shows that bounded phase difference transfers L^2 maximal bounds on the H^β spaces appearing in (1.10). Consequently the advertised generality of Theorem 1.3 rests on a self-citation chain rather than on the derivation in this manuscript. The model-case proof is independent, so the circularity is localized to this transfer step.

  2. self citation load bearing [Section 5, final paragraph (transfer of Theorem 1.5 failure)]
    "Now, the general case of the asymptotically concave dispersive equations of degree a follows from the result for the fractional Schrödinger equation which we just proved and the transference principle (Lemma 3.4). Indeed, in their case, if the estimate (1.10) is true for some β0 < a/4, then it would also be true for any β > β0. Then by the transference principle Lemma 3.4 and Remark 3.3, (1.10) is also true for the fractional Schrödinger equation of degree a, for any β > β0 and hence in particular for the choice β = 1/2(β0 + a/4) < a/4. But that is a contradiction."

    The failure statement for all asymptotically concave phases is obtained by running the same self-cited transfer in reverse: a hypothetical estimate for a general ψ is pushed back to the model phase λ^a, where the paper's counterexample applies. As in Section 4, no proof of the transfer principle appears here; it is quoted as [De2, Theorem 1.6]. Therefore the sharpness theorem for the declared class of phases inherits its entire generality from the author's prior, unexhibited result. If that transfer were unavailable, Theorem 1.5 would be established only for the fractional Schrödinger equation corresponding to ˜∆.

full rationale

The derivation for the model phase λ^a is self-contained: Lemma 3.1 is proved in the paper, Lemma 3.6 is a rescaled version of Walther's Lemma 3.5, the estimates for T1, T4, T5, T6 use only stated series expansions, Lemma 2.3, and Pitt's inequality, and the Section 5 counterexample is built from scratch. So the score is not high. The circularity is at the interface between the model and the advertised class: both Theorem 1.3 and Theorem 1.5 for general asymptotically concave phases are reduced, in the opening and closing paragraphs of Sections 4 and 5, to the author's own [De2, Theorem 1.6]. The only condition connecting a general ψ to λ^a is Definition 3.2(iii), a bounded phase difference, and the paper does not show that this condition transfers L^2 maximal estimates. Thus the headline generality is carried by a self-citation chain. I also flag Section 6(1): the abstract's claim that the result is 'new even for R^n' is not supported by this manuscript, since that section says an analogue of the transference principle in R^n would be 'the key' and is not supplied. That is a missing-support and overclaim concern rather than a further circularity; it reinforces that the general-phase mechanism is exactly the unexhibited transferred principle.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard harmonic analysis of Damek-Ricci spaces (spherical function expansions, c-function bounds), Walther's Euclidean oscillatory and maximal estimates, and the author's prior transference principle. No data-fitting parameters or new entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Bessel series expansion and coefficient estimates for spherical functions (Lemma 2.2, (2.10)-(2.11))
    These are prior results on Damek-Ricci spaces (As95, APV15) that give the local and asymptotic expansions of the spherical function; cited in section 2.3.
  • domain assumption Harish-Chandra c-function estimates (2.6)-(2.7)
    Estimates for |c(λ)|^{-2} and its derivatives, cited from RS09 and As95; used throughout for Sobolev norm comparisons.
  • domain assumption Walther's oscillatory integral estimate and Euclidean maximal estimate (Lemma 2.3, Lemma 3.5)
    The one-dimensional oscillatory integral bound and the unit-ball maximal estimate for fractional Schrödinger on R^n are imported from Wa01; acknowledged as prior results.
  • domain assumption Transference principle for comparable oscillation (Lemma 3.4)
    States that phases differing by O(1) at high frequency give equivalent maximal estimates. Cited to the author's own arXiv preprint [De2]; not proved in this paper. This is the load-bearing bridge for the full class of asymptotically concave phases.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Regularity and pointwise convergence for dispersive equations with asymptotically concave phase on Damek-Ricci spaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GE5JGICL

@misc{pith2026250600881,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Regularity and pointwise convergence for dispersive equations with asymptotically concave phase on Damek-Ricci spaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GE5JGICL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.00881}
}
abstract

We study the Carleson's problem on Damek-Ricci spaces $S$ for dispersive equations: \begin{equation*} \begin{cases} i\frac{\partial u}{\partial t} +\Psi(\sqrt{-\mathcal{L}} )u=0\:,\: (x,t) \in S \times \mathbb{R} \:, \\ u(0,\cdot)=f\:,\: \text{ on } S \:, \end{cases} \end{equation*} where $\mathcal{L}= \Delta$, the Laplace-Beltrami operator or $\tilde{\Delta}$, the shifted Laplace-Beltrami operator, so that the corresponding phase function $\psi$ satisfies for some $a \in (0,1)$, the large frequency asymptotic: \begin{equation*} \psi(\lambda)=\lambda^a + \mathcal{O}(1)\:,\:\: \lambda \gg 1\:. \end{equation*} For almost everywhere pointwise convergence of the solution $u$ to its radial initial data $f$, we obtain the almost sharp regularity threshold $\beta>a/4$. This result is new even for $\mathbb{R}^n$ and in the special case of the fractional Schr\"odinger equations, generalizes classical Euclidean results of Walther.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The spherical Fourier transform of rapidly decreasing functions

    Anker, J-P. The spherical Fourier transform of rapidly decreasing functions. A simple proof of a characterization due to Harish-Chandra, Helgason, Trombi, and Varadarajan . J. Funct. Anal. Volume 96, Issue 2, 1991, 331-349,

    work page 1991

  2. [2]

    and Yacoub, C

    Anker, J-P., Damek, E. and Yacoub, C. Spherical analysis on harmonic AN groups . Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. 4, 23 (1996), no. 4, 643-679

    work page 1996

  3. [3]

    and Pierfelice, V

    Anker, J-P. and Pierfelice, V. Wave and Klein-Gordon equations on hyperbolic spaces . Anal. PDE, 2014, 7(4), pp.953-995

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    and Vallarino, M

    Anker, J-P., Pierfelice, V. and Vallarino, M. The wave equation on Damek-Ricci spaces , Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) 194 (2015), no. 3, 731-758

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    A class of L^p convolutors on harmonic extensions of H-type groups

    Astengo, F. A class of L^p convolutors on harmonic extensions of H-type groups . J. Lie Theory 5 (1995), no. 2, 147-164

    work page 1995

  6. [6]

    and Sundari, M

    Astengo, F., Cowling, M., Di Blasio, B. and Sundari, M. Hardy's uncertainty principle on certain Lie groups . J. London Math. Soc. (2) 62 (2000), no. 2, 461–472

    work page 2000

  7. [7]

    and Sáez, M

    Banica, V., González, M.d.M. and Sáez, M. Some constructions for the fractional Laplacian on noncompact manifolds. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 31 (2015), no. 2, pp. 681–712

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Spectral projections and resolvent estimates on Damek-Ricci spaces and their applications

    Bhowmik, M. and Dewan, U. Spectral projections and resolvent estimates on Damek-Ricci spaces and their applications. arXiv:2306.06875

    work page Pith review arXiv

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    and Xu, Z

    Bloom, W.R. and Xu, Z. Fourier transforms of Schwartz functions on Ch\'ebli-Trim\`eche Hypergroups. Monatsh. Math. 125, 89-109 (1998)

    1998

  2. [10]

    A note on the Schr\"odinger maximal function

    Bourgain, J. A note on the Schr\"odinger maximal function. J. Anal. Math. 130 (2016), 393-396

    2016

  3. [11]

    and Miao, C

    Cao, Z. and Miao, C. Sharp pointwise convergence on the Schr\"odinger operator along one class of curves. Bull. Sci. Math. 184 (2023) 103254

    2023

  4. [12]

    Some analytic problems related to statistical mechanics, Euclidean harmonic analysis

    Carleson, L. Some analytic problems related to statistical mechanics, Euclidean harmonic analysis. Lecture Notes in Math. 779, Springer, Berlin, 1980, 5-45

    1980

  5. [13]

    and Ozawa, T

    Cho, Y., Lee, S. and Ozawa, T. On small amplitude solutions to the generalized Boussinesq equations. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. A 17 (2007), 691-711

    2007

  6. [14]

    Pointwise behavior of solutions to Schr\"odinger equations, harmonic analysis

    Cowling, M. Pointwise behavior of solutions to Schr\"odinger equations, harmonic analysis. Lecture Notes in Math. 992. Springer, Berlin, 1983, 83-90

    1983

  7. [15]

    and Ricci, F

    Cowling, M., Dooley, A., Kor\'anyi, A. and Ricci, F. An approach to symmetric spaces of rank one via groups of Heisenberg type. J. Geom. Anal. 8 (1998), no. 2, pp. 199–237

    1998

  8. [16]

    and Meda, S

    Cowling, M., Giulini, S. and Meda, S. L^p-L^q estimates for functions of the Laplace-Beltrami operator on noncompact symmetric spaces I. Duke. Math. J., vol. 72, no. 1, October 1993, pp. 109-150

    1993

  9. [17]

    and Kenig, C.E

    Dahlberg, B.E.J. and Kenig, C.E. A note on the almost everywhere behavior of solutions of the Schr\"odinger equation. Lecture Notes in Math. 908. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982, 205-208

    1982

  10. [18]

    Smoothing effects of Schr\"odinger evolution groups on Riemannian manifolds

    Doi, S. Smoothing effects of Schr\"odinger evolution groups on Riemannian manifolds. Duke Math. J. 82(1996), 679-706

    1996

  11. [19]

    Pointwise convergence of solutions of the Schr\"odinger equation along general curves on Damek-Ricci spaces

    Dewan, U. Pointwise convergence of solutions of the Schr\"odinger equation along general curves on Damek-Ricci spaces. arXiv:2411.14020

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    Regularity and pointwise convergence of solutions of the Schr\"odinger operator with radial initial data on Damek-Ricci spaces

    Dewan, U. Regularity and pointwise convergence of solutions of the Schr\"odinger operator with radial initial data on Damek-Ricci spaces. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 204, no. 3, 1161-1182 (2025)

    2025

  13. [21]

    Maximal estimates and pointwise convergence for solutions of certian dispersive equations with radial initial data on Damek-Ricci spaces

    Dewan, U. Maximal estimates and pointwise convergence for solutions of certian dispersive equations with radial initial data on Damek-Ricci spaces. arXiv:2501.08323

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    and Ray, S.K

    Dewan, U. and Ray, S.K. Mapping properties of the local Schr\"odinger maximal function with radial initial data on Damek-Ricci spaces. arXiv:2411.04084

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    and Niu, Y

    Ding, Y. and Niu, Y. Maximal estimate for solutions to a class of dispersive equation with radial initial data. Front. Math. China 2017, 12(5): 1057-1084

    2017

  16. [24]

    and Li, X

    Du, X., Guth, L. and Li, X. A sharp Schr\"odinger maximal estimate in ^2 . Ann. Math. 2017, 186, 607-640

    2017

  17. [25]

    and Zhang, R

    Du, X. and Zhang, R. Sharp L^2 estimates of the Schr\"odinger maximal function in higher dimensions. Ann. Math. 2019, 189, 837-861

    2019

  18. [26]

    and Xuan, P

    Ferreira, L. and Xuan, P. Dispersive estimates and generalized Boussinesq equation on hyperbolic spaces with rough initial data. arXiv:2410.20472 \:

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    and Varadarajan, V.S

    Gangolli, R. and Varadarajan, V.S. Harmonic Analysis of Spherical Functions on Real Reductive Groups

  20. [28]

    and Wang, B

    Guo, Z., Peng, L. and Wang, B. Decay estimates for a class of wave equations. J. Funct. Anal. 254 (2008), pp. 1642-1660

    2008

  21. [29]

    Groups and geometric analysis, Integral geometry, invariant differential operators, and spherical functions

    Helgason, S. Groups and geometric analysis, Integral geometry, invariant differential operators, and spherical functions . Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 83. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 2000

    2000

  22. [30]

    The Radon transform

    Helgason, S. The Radon transform. Second edition. Progress in Mathematics, 5. Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1999

    1999

  23. [31]

    Radial functions and regularity of solutions to the Schr\"odinger equation

    Prestini, E. Radial functions and regularity of solutions to the Schr\"odinger equation. Monatsh. Math. 109, 135-143 (1990)

    1990

  24. [32]

    Modern Fourier Analysis

    Grafakos, L. Modern Fourier Analysis. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 2nd ed, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

    2009

  25. [33]

    and Ruiz, A

    Kenig, C.E. and Ruiz, A. A strong type (2,2) estimate for a maximal operator associated to the Schr\"odinger equation. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 280 (1983), 239-246

    1983

  26. [34]

    and Sajjan, M

    Kumar, P. and Sajjan, M. Regularity of solution of the Schr\"odinger equation on Symmetric Space . arXiv:2411.06104

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    A note on almost everywhere convergence along tangential curves to the Schr\"odinger equation initial datum

    Minguill\'on, J. A note on almost everywhere convergence along tangential curves to the Schr\"odinger equation initial datum. J. Geom. Anal. (2024) 34:333

    2024

  28. [36]

    Weighted norm inequalities for the Fourier transform

    Muckenhoupt, B. Weighted norm inequalities for the Fourier transform. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 276 (1983), 729–742

    1983

  29. [37]

    and Sarkar, R.P

    Ray, S.K. and Sarkar, R.P. Fourier and Radon transform on harmonic NA groups. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 361 (2009), no. 8, 4269–4297

    2009

  30. [38]

    ogren, P. and Sj\

    Sj\"ogren, P. and Sj\"olin, P. Convergence properties for the time dependent Schr\"odinger equation . Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. 14 (1989), pp. 13-25

    1989

  31. [39]

    Convolution with oscillating kernels

    Sj\"olin, P. Convolution with oscillating kernels. Indiana Univ Math J, 1981, 30: pp. 47-55

    1981

  32. [40]

    olin, P. Regularity of solutions to the Schr\

    Sj\"olin, P. Regularity of solutions to the Schr\"odinger equation. Duke Math J. 55(1987), 699-715

    1987

  33. [41]

    olin, P. Global maximal estimates for solutions to the Schr\

    Sj\"olin, P. Global maximal estimates for solutions to the Schr\"odinger equation. Studia Math. 110(1994), 105-114

    1994

  34. [42]

    olin, P. Radial functions and maximal estimates for solutions to the Schr\

    Sj\"olin, P. Radial functions and maximal estimates for solutions to the Schr\"odinger equation. J. Austral. Math. Soc. (Series A) 59(1995), 134-142

    1995

  35. [43]

    olin, P. L^p maximal estimates for solutions to the Schr\

    Sj\"olin, P. L^p maximal estimates for solutions to the Schr\"odinger equation. Math. Scand., vol. 81, no. 1 (1997), pp. 35-68

    1997

  36. [44]

    Stanton, R. J. and Tomas, P. A. Expansions for spherical functions on noncompact symmetric spaces. Acta Math. 140 (1978), no. 3-4, pp. 251-276

    1978

  37. [45]

    Interpolation of Linear Operators

    Stein, E.M. Interpolation of Linear Operators. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. vol. 83, no. 2 (1956), 482–492

    1956

  38. [46]

    Oscillatory integrals in Fourier analysis

    Stein, E.M. Oscillatory integrals in Fourier analysis. In: Stein E M, ed. Beijing Lectures in Harmonic Analysis. Ann of Math Stud, vol 112. Princeton: Princeton Univ Press, 1986, pp. 307-355

    1986

  39. [47]

    and Weiss, G

    Stein, E.M. and Weiss, G. Introduction to Fourier Analysis on Euclidean Spaces. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, Sixth printing, 1990

    1990

  40. [48]

    Schr\"odinger equations: pointwise convergence to the initial data

    Vega, L. Schr\"odinger equations: pointwise convergence to the initial data. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 102(1988), 874-878

    1988

  41. [49]

    and Zhang, C

    Wang, X. and Zhang, C. Pointwise Convergence of Solutions to the Schr\"odinger Equation on Manifolds . Canad. J. Math. Vol. 71(4), 2019, 983-995

    2019

  42. [50]

    Maximal estimates for oscillatory integrals with concave phase

    Walther, B.G. Maximal estimates for oscillatory integrals with concave phase. - In: Harmonic Analysis and Operator Theory, Proceedings of a conference in honor of Mischa Cotlar, edited by S.A.M. Marcantognini. Contemp. Math. 189, 1995, 485-495

    1995

  43. [51]

    Higher integrability for maximal oscillatory Fourier integrals

    Walther, B.G. Higher integrability for maximal oscillatory Fourier integrals. Annales Academiae Scientarium Fennicae Mathematica, vol. 26, 2001, 189-204

    2001

  44. [52]

    Sharp maximal estimates for doubly oscillatory integral

    Walther, B.G. Sharp maximal estimates for doubly oscillatory integral. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 130 (12), 3641-3650, 2002

    2002

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.