Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 minor 78 references

The topology, geometry, and angular momentum of cold plasma waves

T0 review · 0 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that cold plasma R and L circularly polarized waves are topologically nontrivial bundles with Chern numbers ∓2, so pure circularly polarized plasma waves must develop dark spots.

desk verdict Central claims hold up on inspection; the paper is a careful transfer of the authors' photon-topology machinery to cold plasma waves, and the main caveats are about outsourced proofs and informal extensions, not wrong math. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.01142 v2 pith:75UJGO5T submitted 2025-06-01 physics.plasm-ph

Eric Palmerduca , Hong Qin This is my paper
classification physics.plasm-ph
keywords topologicalvectorbundlescoldplasmawavesChernnumberscircularpolarizationspin-weightedsphericalharmonicsangularmomentumdecompositionhelicityLangmuir
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the state spaces of linear waves in a cold, unmagnetized plasma are not just collections of plane-wave solutions but carry a global topological structure: a vector bundle over momentum space with the origin removed. It shows that the full electromagnetic bundle is topologically trivial, with an explicitly constructed smooth polarization basis, but that its rotationally invariant R and L circularly polarized subbundles are nontrivial, with Chern numbers $C(\zeta_\pm)=\mp 2$. Because of that, any continuous superposition made purely of R or L waves must vanish somewhere in direction space. The paper then derives the angular-momentum eigenstates of these waves as spin-weighted spherical harmonics, a family of functions on the sphere that generalize the ordinary spherical harmonics, and shows that the angular momentum cannot be split into spin and orbital parts; instead it decomposes into helicity and orbital quasi-angular momenta. A sympathetic reader would care because these results transfer the known photon-bundle topology to effectively massive electromagnetic plasma waves, tie it to the electrostatic--electromagnetic resonance, and constrain how orbital angular momentum can be defined and measured in plasmas.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Hermitian vector bundle formed by the wave polarizations over the punctured momentum space $\mathbb{R}^3\setminus\{0\}$, whose nontriviality is measured by the first Chern number. The degeneracy of the electrostatic and electromagnetic modes at $(\omega/c,k)=(\omega_p/c,0)$ forces removal of that point, creating the non-contractible base manifold and making nontrivial bundles possible. The little-group, or helicity, decomposition splits the electromagnetic bundle into R and L line bundles, and the angular-momentum analysis is carried by spin-weighted spherical harmonics, a family of functions on the sphere that generalize the ordinary spherical harmonics and provide a global basis for each helicity sector. Finally, the rotational connection on the bundles induces the splitting of $J$ into $J_\parallel$ and $J_\perp$.

What would settle it

Find any additional point in the cold-plasma dispersion relation where the electrostatic and electromagnetic branches coincide, or construct a smooth nonvanishing section of the R or L bundle over the sphere; either would make the asserted Chern numbers $\mp 2$ impossible. In the kinetic case, a numerical or analytic solution of the full Landau-contour dispersion relation showing an ES-EM degeneracy at $k\neq 0$, or a branch crossing in the small-$k$ limit, would falsify the claimed extension.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the topological vector-bundle structure of vacuum photon waves survives in cold plasma waves even though the plasma gives the electromagnetic waves an effective mass. The bundles $\zeta_+$ and $\zeta_-$ formed by R and L circularly polarized modes are topologically nontrivial with Chern numbers $\mp 2$, while the full electromagnetic bundle $\zeta_{\mathrm{EM}}$ and the Langmuir bundle $\zeta_0$ are trivial. Because the R and L bundles are nontrivial, no globally nonvanishing continuous section exists, so monochromatic R or L polarized waves cannot propagate in all directions without at least one dark direction. The same structure yields the angular-momentum result: simultaneous eigenstates of energy, helicity, $J^2$, and $J_z$ are spin-weighted spherical harmonics, and the resulting multiplet structure, with $j\ge 1$ and one multiplet per $j$, is incompatible with any genuine spin-orbital decomposition; a rigorous no-go argument shows the would-be spin operator must be zero. The rotational symmetry instead induces a gauge-invariant decomposition $J = J_\parallel + J_\perp$ into helicity and orbital quasi-angular momenta, which do not generate rotations, do not satisfy angular-momentum commutation relations, and have continuous spectra.

Load-bearing premise

The whole classification rests on the assumption that the electrostatic and electromagnetic modes degenerate at exactly one point, $(\omega/c,k)=(\omega_p/c,0)$, and that no smooth continuation of the ES/EM splitting exists through that point, so the bundle base is genuinely the punctured space $\mathbb{R}^3\setminus\{0\}$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every continuous R- or L-polarized plasma wave field must vanish for at least one propagation direction, so all-direction circularly polarized beams are impossible.
  • A complete set of commuting observables for cold plasma waves is energy, helicity, $J^2$, and $J_z$; the eigenbasis is countable and labelled by spin-weighted spherical harmonics.
  • No spin operator $S$ and orbital operator $L$ satisfying $SO(3)$ commutation relations can decompose the plasma angular momentum, so Clebsch-Gordan and Casimir-based tools do not apply to any attempted SAM-OAM splitting.
  • The physically measurable split is $J = J_\parallel + J_\perp$, helicity and orbital quasi-angular momenta, which is gauge invariant and connects to the inverse Faraday effect in plasmas.
  • In the Maxwellian, $v_T\ll c$ kinetic limit, the same bundle topology should persist, so the spin-weighted spherical harmonic basis and the absence of an SAM-OAM decomposition extend to kinetic unmagnetized plasmas under the paper's stated assumptions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: If any additional electrostatic-electromagnetic degeneracy exists beyond $(\omega/c,k)=(\omega_p/c,0)$, or if the ES/EM separation can be continued smoothly through that point, the Chern number classification and every consequence built on it would change; this provides a concrete sensitivity test.
  • Inference: The dark spots forced by the nontrivial R and L bundles might be observable as direction-dependent nulls in tightly focused or structured plasma beams, analogous to polarization singularities in optics.
  • Inference: Experiments using so-called orbital angular momentum beams in laser-plasma accelerators may need reinterpretation: the beams still carry angular momentum, but its multipole content cannot be decomposed into independent spin and orbital parts in the way the OAM label usually assumes.
  • Inference: The same excise-a-degeneracy strategy could classify other continuous wave systems whose dispersion branches meet at a single point, such as magnetized, multi-species, or flowing plasmas, giving a topological invariant whenever the base space becomes non-contractible.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper develops a vector-bundle formalism for linear waves in a cold, homogeneous, unmagnetized plasma. Over the punctured momentum space R^3\{0}, it classifies the electrostatic Langmuir bundle ζ0 and the electromagnetic bundle ζEM, proving that both are trivial and supplying an explicit clutching-based global orthonormal basis for ζEM. Using the little-group method, the paper splits ζEM into helicity subbundles ζ± and assigns them Chern numbers C(ζ±)=∓2, so every continuous R or L polarized section must vanish somewhere. It then shows that the angular-momentum eigenstates of the R, L, and Langmuir waves are spin-weighted spherical harmonics, proves a no-go theorem excluding a genuine SAM-OAM decomposition, and constructs a symmetry-induced quasi-angular momentum splitting J=J∥+J⊥ with continuous spectra. The final section outlines, in a self-described informal way, how these results might extend to kinetic plasmas.

Significance. These results, if correct, are significant for the plasma and wave-topology communities. They show that the nontrivial photon-bundle topology survives the introduction of an effective mass, give a concrete global polarization basis, and sharpen the discussion of plasma-wave angular momentum by distinguishing true angular momentum from the quasi-angular momentum operators used in the optics literature. I found the central mathematical steps sound: the single-degeneracy structure at (ωp/c,0) is visible from the dispersion tensor (8); the identification ζEM≅γ is metric- and symmetry-preserving; a Berry-connection computation from the paper's own basis (41) reproduces C(ζ±)=∓2; and the no-go argument based on the absence of nontrivial 2D SO(3) representations is valid. The paper's explicit constructions (the clutching basis and the SWSH expansion) and its falsifiable consequences (dark spots for R/L waves; continuous spectra for J∥ and J⊥) are strengths. The main weaknesses are presentation and self-containedness: several key theorems are imported from the authors' prior papers, and the kinetic extension is admittedly informal.

minor comments (7)
  1. [Section III.B, Eqs. (24)-(26)] The global basis is stated to be smooth at the poles and along the equator, but the verification is not shown in the text; since this is one of the paper's explicit constructions, a short argument or a precise reference to the clutching construction would make the claim easier to check.
  2. [Section III.C] The Chern numbers C(ζ±)=∓2 are quoted from Ref. [23] rather than computed here; because these numbers are central quantitative claims, the authors should include at least the one-line Berry-connection derivation (with A=i⟨e+|de+⟩=cosθ dφ giving F=-sinθ dθ∧dφ) or state the relevant theorem explicitly.
  3. [Section III.D] The claim that the electromagnetic-electrostatic resonance is a 'precondition' for topological nontriviality is interpretive rather than a proved implication; the rigorous statement is that the degeneracy forces the base manifold to be punctured, which allows nontrivial bundles. The authors should soften the language accordingly.
  4. [Section IV, Eq. (48)] The notation E_hjm=-hY_jm e_h is easy to misread; a sentence explaining that the spin weight of the SWSH is -h (so that h=+1 uses -1Y_jm and h=-1 uses +1Y_jm) would improve clarity.
  5. [Section VI] The kinetic-plasma extension is explicitly informal and rests on small-k approximations in Eqs. (83)-(84); the section should be clearly labeled as an outlook rather than a proven equivalence, and the Conclusion should repeat this qualification.
  6. [Appendix A] There are several typographical slips that need proofreading: Eq. (A1d) has an unbalanced parenthesis, Eq. (A19d) retains a stray subscript h in the term mn1,h v, and Eq. (A43b) contains an apparent extra d^3k in the integrand.
  7. [Section II, after Eq. (8)] The statement that the limits lim_{k→0} ζ0(k) and lim_{k→0} ζEM(k) do not exist is central to the punctured-base construction; since D_E(ωp,0)=0 makes the full fiber C^3 at the origin, a single sentence spelling this out would strengthen the justification.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the plasma bundle topology follows from the explicit dispersion tensor and transversality condition, and the cited self-papers are theorem-level independent support rather than fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claims do not reduce by construction to their inputs. The bundles ζ_EM, ζ_0, and ζ_± are defined directly from the linearized cold-plasma dispersion tensor (8) and the transversality condition E·k=0; no parameters are fitted to output quantities. The key structural fact, that the electrostatic and electromagnetic modes degenerate only at (ω/c,k)=(ω_p/c,0), follows from the explicit dispersion relation ω^2=ω_p^2 and ω^2=ω_p^2+k^2c^2, and it is this single degeneracy that forces the punctured base R^3\{0}. The isomorphism ζ_EM ≅ γ is immediate because both bundles have the same fibers {E: k·E=0} over the same base, and the paper states this explicitly rather than assuming the desired topology. The Chern numbers C(ζ_±)=∓2 are imported from Ref. [23], Theorem 18, which is a published, parameter-free mathematical theorem for the photon bundle; applying it to ζ_± is legitimate because the helicity±1 subbundles of ζ_EM are identical in structure to those of γ. This is self-citation, but it is not circular: the cited theorem does not assume the plasma result. The no-SAM-OAM argument is reproduced in the paper itself via the fiber-dimension obstruction (no non-projective two-dimensional SO(3) representation), not merely cited. The SWSH eigenbasis is derived from the explicit operators in Eq. (45), with Dray's theorem as external mathematics. The explicit global basis (24)-(26) is constructed in the text and is checkable. Section VI is admittedly informal and explicitly framed as a route for future work, so its lack of rigor is a scope caveat, not circularity. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained in its plasma-specific steps, with the cited prior results acting as independent mathematical support. Score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted and no new physical entities are introduced. The mathematical objects, including the ζ± bundles and the quasi-angular momentum operators J∥ and J⊥, are constructed within the cold plasma model. The central claims rely on standard bundle theory and on theorems from the authors' previous papers, which are parameter-free derivations with stated assumptions.

assumptions (9)
  • standard math Classification of complex vector bundles over S^2 by first Chern number
    Used in Sec. III to reduce topology of ζ0, ζEM, ζ± over R^3\{0} to Chern numbers.
  • standard math The complexification of a real vector bundle has vanishing first Chern number (Ref. [23], Theorem 7)
    Invoked in Sec. III.B to prove ζEM is trivial.
  • standard math The hairy ball theorem applies only to real vector fields; complex transverse vector fields can be nowhere vanishing
    Used in Sec. III.B to argue that a global complex basis may exist despite the real hairy ball obstruction.
  • standard math The little group of k is SO(2), whose irreducible representations are one-dimensional and labeled by integer helicity
    Used in Sec. III.C to decompose ζEM into ζ+ ⊕ ζ-.
  • standard math Finite-dimensional ordinary representations of SO(3) have odd dimension; the 2D EM fiber is a trivial SO(3) representation
    Key premise of the no-go theorem in Sec. IV that S=0 for any internal SO(3)-generating spin operator.
  • standard math Spin-weighted spherical harmonics solve the angular momentum eigenvalue equations (Dray 1985, Ref. [56])
    Used in Sec. IV to identify the eigenstates Ehjm = -hYjm eh.
  • domain assumption The cold unmagnetized plasma linearized fluid equations with immobile neutralizing ions (Eqs. 1-6) describe the waves
    The entire vector bundle construction is built on this model; the kinetic extension in Sec. VI is informal.
  • domain assumption The symmetry group is G = R^3+1 ⋊ SO(3), with boosts excluded because the plasma rest frame is preferred
    Stated in Sec. II; rotational symmetry drives the SWSH and no-go results.
  • domain assumption At (ω/c,k)=(ωp/c,0) the three modes degenerate and this point is excised from the base manifold
    This excision creates the non-contractible base R^3\{0}; it is central to the Chern number claims in Secs. II and III.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The topology, geometry, and angular momentum of cold plasma waves." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/75UJGO5T

@misc{pith2026250601142,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The topology, geometry, and angular momentum of cold plasma waves},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/75UJGO5T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.01142}
}
abstract

It was recently discovered that plasma waves possess topologically protected edge modes, indicating the existence of topologically nontrivial structures in the governing equations. Here we give a rigorous study of the underlying topological vector bundle structure of cold unmagnetized plasma waves and show that this topology can be used to uncover a number of new results about these waves. The topological properties of the electromagnetic waves mirror those recently found for photons and other massless particles. We show that there exists an explicit globally smooth polarization basis for electromagnetic plasma waves -- surprisingly, this does not violate the hairy ball theorem. The rotational symmetry of the waves gives a natural decomposition into topologically nontrivial $R$ and $L$ circularly polarized electromagnetic waves and the topologically trivial electrostatic Langmuir waves. The existence of topologically nontrivial waves, despite the effective mass introduced by the plasma, is related to the resonance of electrostatic and electromagnetic waves. We show that the eigenstates of the angular momentum operator are the spin-weighted spherical harmonics, giving a novel globally smooth basis for plasma waves. The sparseness of the resultant angular momentum multiplet structure illustrates that the angular momentum does not split into well-defined spin and orbital parts. However, we demonstrate that the angular momentum admits a natural decomposition, induced by the rotational symmetry, into two quasi-angular momentum components, termed helicity and orbital quasi-angular momentum. Although these operators do not generate physical rotations and therefore do not qualify as true angular momentum operators, they are gauge invariant, well-defined, and appear to be experimentally relevant.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.01142 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Electrostatic (orange) and electromagnetic (blue) dispersion relations for fixed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [23]

    Oblique photons, plasmons, and current-plasmons in relativistic plasmas and their topological implications

    H. Qin and E. Palmerduca, Oblique photons, plasmons, and current-plasmons in relativistic plasmas and their topological implications (2024), arXiv:2404.05636 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  2. [26]

    Palmerduca and H

    E. Palmerduca and H. Qin, Graviton topology, J. High Energy Phys.2024 (11), 150

    work page 2024

  3. [27]

    Palmerduca and H

    E. Palmerduca and H. Qin, Helicity is a topological invariant of massless particles:C = −2h, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L022001 (2025)

    work page 2025

  4. [68]

    Shankar,Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed

    R. Shankar,Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York, 1994)

    1994

  5. [1]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Quantized hall conductance in a two-dimensional periodic potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 405 (1982)

    1982

  6. [2]

    Thus, we find 20 that S = 0 and therefore there is no nontrivial SAM-OAM decomposition

    Similarly, there are no non-projective representations of dimension2, soζEM (k) ∼= V0 ⊕V0 and therefore also corresponds to a trivial representation with generator0. Thus, we find 20 that S = 0 and therefore there is no nontrivial SAM-OAM decomposition. V. HELICITY AND ORBIT AL QUASI-ANGULAR MOMENT A We have shown in the previous section that there is no ...

    work page

  7. [3]

    In fact, this is precisely the solution for Langmuir waves since such waves are effectively scalar

    Note that if Ehjm were a scalar function rather than a section of a vector bundle, then these equations would be equivalent to the angular part of the time-independent Schrödinger equation, which is solved by the ordinary spherical harmonics. In fact, this is precisely the solution for Langmuir waves since such waves are effectively scalar. Indeed, if we ...

    work page

  8. [4]

    J. E. Avron, R. Seiler, and B. Simon, Homotopy and quantization in condensed matter physics, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 51 (1983)

    work page 1983

Show all 78 references
  1. [5]

    Kohmoto, Topological invariant and the quantization of the hall conductance, Ann

    M. Kohmoto, Topological invariant and the quantization of the hall conductance, Ann. Phys. 160, 343 (1985)

    1985

  2. [6]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Berry curvature on the fermi surface: Anomalous hall effect as a topological fermi-liquid property, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 206602 (2004)

    2004

  3. [7]

    Schulz-Baldes, J

    H. Schulz-Baldes, J. Kellendonk, and T. Richter, Simultaneous quantization of edge and bulk hall conductivity, J. Phys. A33, L27 (2000)

    2000

  4. [8]

    B. A. Bernevig and T. L. Hughes, Topological Insulators and Topological Superconductors (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2013)

    2013

  5. [9]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum spin hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 226801 (2005)

    2005

  6. [10]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  7. [11]

    Souslov, B

    A. Souslov, B. C. Van Zuiden, D. Bartolo, and V. Vitelli, Topological sound in active-liquid metamaterials, Nat. Phys.13, 1091 (2017)

    2017

  8. [12]

    Delplace, J

    P. Delplace, J. B. Marston, and A. Venaille, Topological origin of equatorial waves, Science 358, 1075 (2017)

    2017

  9. [13]

    Tauber, P

    C. Tauber, P. Delplace, and A. Venaille, A bulk-interface correspondence for equatorial waves, J. Fluid Mech.868, R2 (2019)

    2019

  10. [14]

    Souslov, K

    A. Souslov, K. Dasbiswas, M. Fruchart, S. Vaikuntanathan, and V. Vitelli, Topological Waves in Fluids with Odd Viscosity, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 128001 (2019)

    2019

  11. [15]

    Perrot, P

    M. Perrot, P. Delplace, and A. Venaille, Topological transition in stratified fluids, Nat. Phys. 15, 781 (2019). 39

    2019

  12. [16]

    Faure, Manifestation of the topological index formula in quantum waves and geophysical waves, Ann

    F. Faure, Manifestation of the topological index formula in quantum waves and geophysical waves, Ann. Henri Lebesgue6, 449 (2023)

    2023

  13. [17]

    B. Yang, M. Lawrence, W. Gao, Q. Guo, and S. Zhang, One-way helical electromagnetic wave propagation supported by magnetized plasma, Sci. Rep.6, 21461 (2016)

    2016

  14. [18]

    W. Gao, B. Yang, M. Lawrence, F. Fang, B. Béri, and S. Zhang, Photonic Weyl degeneracies in magnetized plasma, Nat. Commun.7, 12435 (2016)

    2016

  15. [19]

    J. B. Parker, J. B. Marston, S. M. Tobias, and Z. Zhu, Topological gaseous plasmon polariton in realistic plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 195001 (2020)

    2020

  16. [20]

    Fu and H

    Y. Fu and H. Qin, Topological phases and bulk-edge correspondence of magnetized cold plas- mas, Nat. Commun.12, 3924 (2021)

    2021

  17. [21]

    Fu and H

    Y. Fu and H. Qin, The dispersion and propagation of topological Langmuir-cyclotron waves in cold magnetized plasmas, J. Plasma Phys.88, 835880401 (2022)

    2022

  18. [22]

    Qin and Y

    H. Qin and Y. Fu, Topological Langmuir-cyclotron wave, Sci. Adv.9, eadd8041 (2023)

    2023

  19. [24]

    L. W. Tu,Differential Geometry: Connections, Curvature, and Characteristic Classes, Grad- uate Texts in Mathematics (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017)

    2017

  20. [25]

    Palmerduca and H

    E. Palmerduca and H. Qin, Photon topology, Phys. Rev. D109, 085005 (2024)

    2024

  21. [28]

    Palmerduca and H

    E. Palmerduca and H. Qin, Four no-go theorems on the existence of spin and orbital angular momentum of massless bosons, SciPost Phys.18, 188 (2025)

    2025

  22. [29]

    Palmerduca and H

    E. Palmerduca and H. Qin, Spin-weighted spherical harmonics as massless angular momentum eigenstates and their role in obstructing spin-orbital decompositions (2025), arXiv:2505.12765 [math-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  23. [30]

    K. T. Phuoc, S. Corde, R. Shah, F. Albert, R. Fitour, J.-P. Rousseau, F. Burgy, B. Mercier, and A. Rousse, Imaging electron trajectories in a laser-wakefield cavity using betatron x-ray radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 225002 (2006)

    2006

  24. [31]

    Thaury, E

    C. Thaury, E. Guillaume, S. Corde, R. Lehe, M. Le Bouteiller, K. Ta Phuoc, X. Davoine, J. M. Rax, A. Rousse, and V. Malka, Angular-momentum evolution in laser-plasma accelerators, 40 Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 135002 (2013)

    2013

  25. [32]

    Luís Martins, J

    J. Luís Martins, J. Vieira, J. Ferri, and T. Fülöp, Radiation emission in laser-wakefields driven by structured laser pulses with orbital angular momentum, Sci. Rep.9, 9840 (2019)

    2019

  26. [33]

    Y.Shi, D.Blackman, D.Stutman,andA.Arefiev,Generationofultrarelativisticmonoenergetic electron bunches via a synergistic interaction of longitudinal electric and magnetic fields of a twisted laser, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 234801 (2021)

    2021

  27. [34]

    Longman and R

    A. Longman and R. Fedosejevs, Kilo-tesla axial magnetic field generation with high intensity spin and orbital angular momentum beams, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 043180 (2021)

    2021

  28. [35]

    Longman and R

    A. Longman and R. Fedosejevs, Modeling of high intensity orbital angular momentum beams for laser–plasma interactions, Phys. Plasmas29, 063109 (2022)

    2022

  29. [36]

    Ji, C.-W

    Y. Ji, C.-W. Lian, Y. Shi, R. Yan, S. Cao, C. Ren, and J. Zheng, Generating axial magnetic fields via two plasmon decay driven by a twisted laser, Phys. Rev. Res.5, L022025 (2023)

    2023

  30. [37]

    Y. Shen, X. Wang, Z. Xie, C. Min, X. Fu, Q. Liu, M. Gong, and X. Yuan, Optical vortices 30 years on: OAM manipulation from topological charge to multiple singularities, Light Sci. Appl. 8, 90 (2019)

    2019

  31. [38]

    S. J. van Enk and G. Nienhuis, Spin and orbital angular momentum of photons, EPL25, 497 (1994)

    1994

  32. [39]

    S. M. Barnett and L. Allen, Orbital angular momentum and nonparaxial light beams, Opt. Commun. 110, 670 (1994)

    1994

  33. [40]

    Allen, M

    L. Allen, M. Babiker, and M. J. Padgett, Iv the orbital angular momentum of light, Prog. Opt. 39, 291 (1999)

    1999

  34. [41]

    S. V. Enk and G. N. and, Commutation rules and eigenvalues of spin and orbital angular momentum of radiation fields, J. Mod. Opt.41, 963 (1994)

    1994

  35. [42]

    The angular momentum controversy: What’s it all about and does it matter?

    E. Leader and C. Lorcé, Corrigendum to “The angular momentum controversy: What’s it all about and does it matter?”, Physics Reports802, 23 (2019)

    2019

  36. [43]

    We note, however, that this distinction is not valid in reference frames where the background plasma is flowing [21]

    Modes can be unambiguously labeled as ES or EM when working in the background plasma rest frame. We note, however, that this distinction is not valid in reference frames where the background plasma is flowing [21]

  37. [44]

    L. W. Tu,An Introduction to Manifolds, Universitext (Springer, New York, 2010)

    2010

  38. [45]

    Simms, Lie Groups and Quantum Mechanics, Lecture Notes in Mathematics (Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 1968)

    D. Simms, Lie Groups and Quantum Mechanics, Lecture Notes in Mathematics (Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 1968). 41

    1968

  39. [46]

    Of course, we could produce a solution space that is boost symmetric by allowing the back- ground flow velocity to be arbitrary, but this would lead to many solutions which are physically equivalent and complicate our analysis

  40. [47]

    McDuff and D

    D. McDuff and D. Salamon,Introduction to Symplectic Topology(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017)

    2017

  41. [48]

    Bott and L

    R. Bott and L. W. Tu,Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology, Graduate Texts in Mathe- matics (Springer, New York, 1982)

    1982

  42. [49]

    hairy ball theorem

    J. Milnor, Analytic proofs of the “hairy ball theorem” and the brouwer fixed point theorem, Am. Math. Mon.85, 521 (1978)

    1978

  43. [50]

    Hatcher, Vector bundles and K-theory, unpublished

    A. Hatcher, Vector bundles and K-theory, unpublished

  44. [51]

    Weinberg,The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol

    S. Weinberg,The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995)

    1995

  45. [52]

    Maggiore, A Modern Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, Oxford master series in sta- tistical, computational, and theoretical physics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005)

    M. Maggiore, A Modern Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, Oxford master series in sta- tistical, computational, and theoretical physics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005)

    2005

  46. [53]

    Wigner, On unitary representations of the inhomogeneous lorentz group, Ann

    E. Wigner, On unitary representations of the inhomogeneous lorentz group, Ann. Math.40, 149 (1939)

    1939

  47. [54]

    Reed and B

    M. Reed and B. Simon,Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics II: Fourier Analysis, Self- Adjointness (Academic Press, San Diego, 1975)

    1975

  48. [55]

    R. A. Johnson, Representations of compact groups on topological vector spaces: Some remarks, Proc. Am. Math. Soc.61, 131 (1976)

    1976

  49. [56]

    B. C. Hall,Quantum Theory for Mathematicians, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (Springer, New York, 2013)

    2013

  50. [57]

    Zettili, Quantum Mechanics: Concepts and Applications, 2nd ed

    N. Zettili, Quantum Mechanics: Concepts and Applications, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2009)

    2009

  51. [58]

    Dray, The relationship between monopole harmonics and spin-weighted spherical harmonics, J

    T. Dray, The relationship between monopole harmonics and spin-weighted spherical harmonics, J. Math. Phys.26, 1030 (1985)

    1985

  52. [59]

    J. N. Goldberg, A. J. Macfarlane, E. T. Newman, F. Rohrlich, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Spin- s Spherical Harmonics and ð, J. Math. Phys.8, 2155 (1967)

    1967

  53. [60]

    E. T. Newman and R. Penrose, Note on the Bondi-Metzner-Sachs Group, J. Math. Phys.7, 863 (1966). 42

    1966

  54. [61]

    T. T. Wu and C. N. Yang, Concept of nonintegrable phase factors and global formulation of gauge fields, Phys. Rev. D12, 3845 (1975)

    1975

  55. [62]

    T. T. Wu and C. N. Yang, Dirac monopole without strings: Monopole harmonics, Nucl. Phys. B 107, 365 (1976)

    1976

  56. [63]

    Fakhri, A

    H. Fakhri, A. Dehghani, and A. Jafari, New ladder operators for the monopole harmonics, J. Math. Phys. 48, 023510 (2007)

    2007

  57. [64]

    W. D. Curtis and D. E. Lerner, Complex line bundles in relativity, J. Math. Phys.19, 874 (1978)

    1978

  58. [65]

    Wiaux, L

    Y. Wiaux, L. Jacques, P. Vielva, and P. Vandergheynst, Fast directional correlation on the sphere with steerable filters, Astrophys. J.652, 820 (2006)

    2006

  59. [66]

    Michel and K

    V. Michel and K. Seibert, A mathematical view on spin-weighted spherical harmonics and their applications in geodesy, inMathematical Geodesy, edited by W. Freeden (Springer Spektrum Berlin, Berlin, 2020) Chap. 5, pp. 195–307

    2020

  60. [67]

    S. Yi, D. Kim, J. Na, X. Tong, and M. H. Kim, Spin-weighted spherical harmonics for polarized light transport, ACM Trans. Graph.43, 127 (2024)

    2024

  61. [69]

    K. Y. Bliokh, M. A. Alonso, E. A. Ostrovskaya, and A. Aiello, Angular momenta and spin-orbit interaction of nonparaxial light in free space, Phys. Rev. A82, 063825 (2010)

    2010

  62. [70]

    Palmerduca and H

    E. Palmerduca and H. Qin, Zero curvature is a necessary and sufficient condition for a spin- orbital decomposition, Phys. Rev. D111, 125018 (2025)

    2025

  63. [71]

    Leader and C

    E. Leader and C. Lorcé, The angular momentum controversy: What’s it all about and does it matter?, Phys. Rep.541, 163 (2014)

    2014

  64. [72]

    Leader, The photon angular momentum controversy: Resolution of a conflict between laser optics and particle physics, Phys

    E. Leader, The photon angular momentum controversy: Resolution of a conflict between laser optics and particle physics, Phys. Lett. B756, 303 (2016)

    2016

  65. [73]

    K. Y. Bliokh and Y. P. Bliokh, Momentum, angular momentum, and spin of waves in an isotropic collisionless plasma, Phys. Rev. E105, 065208 (2022)

    2022

  66. [74]

    T. H. Stix,Waves in Plasmas(American Institute of Physics, New York, 1992)

    1992

  67. [75]

    I. Y. Dodin, Plasma waves and instabilities: Lecture notes, unpublished

  68. [76]

    L. D. Landau, On the vibrations of the electronic plasma, inCollected Papers of L.D. Landau, edited by D. Ter Haar (Pergamon, 1965) pp. 445–460. 43

    1965

  69. [77]

    Li, Spin and orbital angular momentum of a class of nonparaxial light beams having a globally defined polarization, Phys

    C.-F. Li, Spin and orbital angular momentum of a class of nonparaxial light beams having a globally defined polarization, Phys. Rev. A80, 063814 (2009)

    2009

  70. [78]

    Cohen-Tannoudji, J

    C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg,Photons and Atoms: Introduction to Quantum Electrodynamics(Wiley, New York, 1989). 44

    1989

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.