Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 56 references

Dynamic Control of Nonlinear Emission by Exciton-Photon Coupling in WS2 Metasurfaces

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read An array of WS2 crescent metaatoms, with a qBIC resonance at 1220 nm exactly twice the A-exciton wavelength, is claimed to enhance second-harmonic emission by more than 98-fold over monolayer WS2 and by four orders of magnitude over…

desk verdict Solid incremental demonstration of bulk WS2 qBIC SHG with a clean double-resonance design, but the temperature-tuning mechanism is under-supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.01255 v1 pith:7UKX35LH submitted 2025-06-02 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Mudassar Nauman , Domenico de Ceglia , Jingshi Yan , Lujun Huang , Mohsen Rahmani , Costantino De Angelis , Andrey E. Miroshnichenko , Yuerui Lu
show 1 more author
Dragomir Neshev
This is my paper
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph
keywords secondharmonicgenerationWS2metasurfacequasi-boundstatesinthecontinuumexciton-photoncouplingmagneticdipoleresonancetunablenonlinearopticstransitionmetaldichalcogenides
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that a patterned slab of bulk WS2 can produce bright, dynamically controllable second-harmonic light without paying the price of ordinary excitonic absorption. The design places a magnetic quasi-bound-state-in-the-continuum (qBIC) resonance at 1220 nm, exactly twice the wavelength of the WS2 A-exciton near 610 nm, so the pump experiences a high-Q photonic mode while the generated harmonic lands on the exciton. The authors report more than 98-fold stronger SHG than a monolayer WS2 reference and about four orders of magnitude stronger than unpatterned WS2 film, and they show the emission can be turned down by heating or cooling the sample or by rotating the pump polarization. The wider point is a design rule: in bulk TMDC metasurfaces, the exciton should sit at the second-harmonic energy, not at the pump energy.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is a pure magnetic-dipole quasi-bound state in the continuum in an array of asymmetric WS2 crescent metaatoms. A cylindrical cavity carved into one side of each cone-shaped metaatom breaks the symmetry and couples the otherwise dark magnetic mode to radiation; multipole decomposition shows the electric-dipole channel vanishing, the anapole condition, exactly at the magnetic-dipole resonance. Setting the qBIC wavelength to twice the A-exciton wavelength makes the fundamental see a high-Q photonic mode while the second harmonic hits the exciton, so the two resonances multiply rather than compete. Temperature and pump polarization then serve as control knobs because the exciton energy shifts with temperature and the qBIC excitation is polarization-selective.

What would settle it

Measure the linear transmission spectrum of the same metasurface at -100, 25, and +100 degrees Celsius and compare the qBIC spectral position and linewidth; if the dip moves by more than a small fraction of its linewidth, the temperature-dependent SHG change cannot be attributed solely to exciton tuning, whereas if it stays fixed while the SHG follows the exciton shift, the virtual-coupling interpretation is supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the SHG enhancement in the WS2 crescent metamaterial is produced by a doubly resonant condition in which the qBIC wavelength equals twice the A-exciton wavelength, $\lambda_{qBIC} = 2\lambda_{E_0^A}$. At this condition the fundamental field is enhanced by the photonic resonance with little one-photon absorption, while the second harmonic overlaps the exciton; the paper interprets the result as exciton-photon interference through a virtual level and models the conversion with Fermi's Golden Rule. Experimentally, metasurface A (qBIC at 1220 nm) shows SHG enhancement of about $1.3\times10^4$ over unpatterned film, more than 98-fold over monolayer WS2, and roughly 9-fold over a control metasurface whose harmonic does not match the exciton; the SHG drops by a factor of about 4.3 when temperature moves the exciton off 610 nm, and by two orders of magnitude when pump polarization turns the qBIC off. The paper also reports a measured SHG efficiency of about $5.8\times10^{-9}$ at 3.56 kW peak pump power.

Load-bearing premise

The temperature-tuning story assumes that cooling and heating shift the WS2 A-exciton energy but leave the 1220 nm qBIC resonance position unchanged, an assumption the paper bases on WS2's low thermo-optic coefficient without showing temperature-dependent transmission data.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A bulk TMDC metasurface can convert infrared pump light into visible SHG while avoiding one-photon absorption of the pump, because the exciton sits at the harmonic energy rather than the fundamental energy.
  • Rotating the pump polarization by 90 degrees switches the qBIC on and off, yielding about two orders of magnitude SHG contrast and reshaping the six-fold WS2 emission pattern into a dipole pattern.
  • Temperature acts as a reversible tuning knob: moving the A-exciton off 610 nm reduces the SHG by roughly a factor of 4.3, and returning to room temperature restores the doubly resonant condition.
  • The same double-resonance recipe should transfer to other TMDC materials by patterning a qBIC at twice the relevant exciton wavelength.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test of the virtual-coupling mechanism would be a temperature-resolved SHG excitation map: if the enhancement truly tracks the exciton, the SHG peak should follow the exciton energy and broaden with the exciton linewidth rather than simply detune from a fixed photonic mode.
  • The 98-fold monolayer comparison uses one monolayer reference from the same crystal; a practical engineering benchmark would be to measure the same crescents against monolayer-on-qBIC hybrid metasurfaces under identical focusing and collection conditions.
  • Because the qBIC fields are enhanced in the carved volume of each metaatom, the same geometry could be loaded with a second emitter or nonlinear material to make the exciton-photon interaction environment-sensitive, though the paper does not demonstrate this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the fabrication and characterization of single-crystalline WS2 crescent metasurfaces that support quasi-bound states in the continuum (qBIC) at pump wavelengths near 1220 nm, and it measures second-harmonic generation (SHG) enhancement relative to unpatterned WS2 film and monolayer WS2. The central claim is that placing the qBIC at twice the A-exciton energy (lambda_qBIC = 2 lambda_E0A) yields a doubly resonant SHG enhancement through a virtual exciton-photon interaction, without one-photon pump absorption. Three metasurfaces (A, B, C) with different qBIC positions are compared, along with polarization- and temperature-dependent SHG measurements. The measured enhancement factors are about 12,777 for metasurface A versus unpatterned film, more than 98-fold versus monolayer WS2, and a roughly 4.3-fold temperature contrast between room temperature and -100 °C.

Significance. If the result holds, the paper would demonstrate a useful route to dynamically controllable nonlinear emission from bulk TMDC metasurfaces, and it would provide a concrete design rule (qBIC at twice the exciton energy) that avoids resonant pump absorption. The main strengths are the controlled A/B/C comparison across qBIC detuning, the direct comparison to unpatterned film on the same flake, the polarization-resolved switching, and the inclusion of full-wave simulations that reproduce the qualitative trends. At the same time, the manuscript lacks error bars or repeated-sample statistics, and the temperature-tuning interpretation rests on a stated but unsupported assumption about the thermo-optic insensitivity of the qBIC resonance. These issues affect the quantitative reliability and the dynamical-control claim, respectively.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.1, Section 2.4, Fig. 4C] The temperature-tuning interpretation requires that the qBIC spectral position be independent of temperature, but this is asserted without a citation or measurement. The sentence 'Because of the low thermo-optic coefficient of WS2, the change in temperature... doesn’t alter the spectral position of qBIC' is load-bearing for Fig. 4C: if the qBIC shifts by even a few nanometers, the pump at 1220 nm detunes from a resonance with Q on the order of ~100, and the quadratic dependence of SHG on local pump intensity would produce a reduction comparable to the observed 4.3-fold contrast, without any change in exciton coupling. Please provide variable-temperature linear transmission spectra of the qBIC (or a quantitative citation for the thermo-optic shift of WS2 at 1220 nm) and include any such shift in the simulations of Fig. 4D. Without this control, the dynamical-control-by-exciton claim is not uniquely supported.
  2. [Section 2.3, Fig. 3D-F] All enhancement factors are reported as single-point values without error bars or repeated-sample statistics. The numbers 12,777, 7,850, and 238 in Fig. 3D-F are presented as definitive, but no uncertainty, number of devices, or number of measurements per condition is given. Because the main quantitative claims (98-fold versus monolayer and four orders of magnitude versus unpatterned film) are central to the paper, please report at least three independent measurements per condition or the measurement uncertainty, and state how many nominally identical devices were tested. As written, the reader cannot assess the reproducibility of the claimed enhancements.
  3. [Section 2.4, Fig. 4C-D] The experimental temperature series contains only four points (-100 °C, -50 °C, RT, +100 °C), and no corresponding linear transmission spectra at these temperatures are shown. The claim that RT maximizes SHG because of the doubly resonant condition depends on the qBIC-temperature assumption in the first major comment. Additionally, the text and figure caption give inconsistent temperature ranges: the text says the range is -100 to 100 °C, while Fig. 4D caption lists -190° to 100°. Please reconcile these ranges and report the measured exciton line positions under the same conditions as the SHG measurements.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.4] There is an apparent typo in the sentence describing the polarization control: 'the qBIC at 1220 nm activates at φ = 90° but turns off at φ = 90°.' The second angle should almost certainly be 0°. Please correct this, as it directly affects the description of the polarization switching experiment.
  2. [Section 2.3] The text states that metasurface A has '9-fold stronger SHG' compared to metasurface C, but the enhancement factors in Fig. 3D and 3F imply a much larger ratio (12,777/238 ≈ 54). Please clarify what the 9-fold comparison refers to or reconcile the numbers.
  3. [Section 2.2, Section 2.4, Fig. 4A] Metasurface B' is introduced in Section 2.4 and Fig. 4A with a qBIC at 1290 nm, but the fabrication section states that only three metasurfaces (A, B, and C) were patterned. Please clarify whether B' is a fourth fabricated device or only a simulation point.
  4. [References] Several references are malformed, including entries where the first author's surname appears in an incorrect position (e.g., 'Yesilkoy, Filiz' and 'K. M. Das'), and some entries lack standard journal formatting. Please revise the reference list.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central SHG enhancement is a measured comparison against reference samples, and the design uses known exciton energies rather than fitting them to the output.

full rationale

The central claim is an experimental measurement comparing SHG from patterned WS2 crescent metasurfaces against unpatterned WS2 film and monolayer WS2 from the same parent crystal. The A/B/C metasurfaces are a controlled geometric variation that shifts the qBIC wavelength, and the SHG enhancements are measured, not derived from a fitted parameter. The doubly resonant design condition (lambda_qBIC = 2 × lambda_E0A) is based on the known A-exciton energy of WS2 (~610 nm) and the measured/designed qBIC at 1220 nm; E0A is not extracted from the SHG data, so there is no self-definitional circularity. The temperature experiment is the weakest point: the paper asserts without a citation or variable-temperature transmission measurement that the qBIC position is temperature-insensitive because of the low thermo-optic coefficient of WS2. This is an unsupported assumption that weakens the temperature-tuning interpretation, but it is not circular reasoning—it does not define the qBIC position in terms of the SHG signal or fit the outcome. The self-citation (ref. 39, the authors' prior work) supports only a peripheral symmetry statement about SHG from top and bottom interfaces of bulk TMDCs, not the main enhancement result. Simulations use literature material parameters and are corroborative rather than the source of the measured enhancement. No fitted input is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing conclusion reduces by construction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests mainly on experimental comparisons, not on a derivation. Free parameters are geometry dimensions used to position qBICs and the undisclosed nonlinear susceptibility in the simulations. The main axioms are the persistence of A-excitons in bulk WS2, surface-only SHG from the inversion-symmetric bulk, the standard Q^2 scaling, and the assertion that temperature moves only the exciton and not the qBIC. No invented entities such as new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Asymmetry parameter delta double-prime (cavity axial displacement) for metasurfaces A, B, B', C = A: 200 nm; B, B', C: varied; exact values in SI
    Chosen by hand to place the qBIC at 1220, 1270, 1290, and 1305 nm; it controls the resonance position but is not fitted to SHG data.
  • Cylindrical cavity radius for metasurface A = 150 nm
    Fabrication geometry selected to induce the qBIC and crescent shape; not fitted to the measured SHG output.
  • Effective second-order nonlinear susceptibility chi(2) of WS2 in full-wave simulations = not disclosed in main text
    SHG simulations require a chi(2) tensor; its value or source is not given in the main text, so it is an unknown parameter in the numerical support.
  • Temperature-dependent exciton line shift E0A(T) = 600 nm at -100C to 622-625 nm at 100C (stated)
    Used to model temperature tuning; based on experimental expectation but no uncertainty or underlying model is given.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Bulk WS2 is inversion-symmetric, so SHG arises only from the top and bottom interfaces.
    Invoked in Section 2.1 to justify the weak surface-like SHG from the bulk film, which is the reference for the enhancement factor.
  • domain assumption A-type exciton properties of monolayers persist in bulk WS2 layers.
    Used in Section 2.1 to set up the double-resonance design; supported by cited literature but assumed for this material.
  • ad hoc to paper Temperature changes do not move the qBIC resonance.
    Asserted in Section 2.1 from a low thermo-optic coefficient, with no measurement or citation provided; the temperature-tuning claim depends on this.
  • domain assumption SHG enhancement follows I_SH proportional to Q^2 I0^2 for qBIC metasurfaces.
    Used in Section 2.3 to explain the enhancement in metasurface C; standard scaling from the cited literature (ref 40).
  • domain assumption Fermi's Golden rule for SHG conversion efficiency describes the double-resonant enhancement.
    Referenced in Section 2.4 and SI section 3.5.3; the derivation is not shown in the main text.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dynamic Control of Nonlinear Emission by Exciton-Photon Coupling in WS2 Metasurfaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7UKX35LH

@misc{pith2026250601255,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dynamic Control of Nonlinear Emission by Exciton-Photon Coupling in WS2 Metasurfaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7UKX35LH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.01255}
}
read the original abstract

Transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) have demonstrated significant potential as versatile quantum materials for light absorption and emission. Their unique properties are primarily governed by exciton-photon interactions, which can be substantially enhanced through coupling with resonant photonic structures. For example, nonlinear light emission, such as second harmonic generation (SHG) is doubly enhanced when the incident wave is resonant simultaneously with the excitonic and photonic resonance. However, the excitonic absorption of incident waves can significantly dump the SHG emission. Here, we propose and demonstrate a tunable enhancement of SHG by leveraging virtual coupling effects between quasi-bound states in the continuum (qBIC) optical resonances and tunable excitons in arrays of high-index WS2 crescent metaatoms. These crescent metaatoms excites a pure magnetic type qBIC resonance, enabling dynamic control and enhancement of nonlinear optical processes in visible spectrum. Our findings demonstrate that an array of WS2 crescent metaatoms, exhibiting qBIC resonance at half the exciton energy, enhances SHG efficiency by more than 98-fold compared to monolayer WS2 (1L-WS2) and four orders of magnitude relative to unpatterned WS2 film. This substantial SHG enhancement is tunable as a function of temperature and polarization angle of incident light, allowing us to obtain control of the virtual coupling and SHG efficiency in the visible spectrum (600-650 nm). Our work opens new avenues toward next-generation reconfigurable meta-optics devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.01255 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Experimental and numerical analysis of the WS2 metasurface. (A) Multipole expansion of metasurface A, where 𝝈 represents the effective cross-section and simulated linear spectrum, showing qBIC resonance at 1220 nm. (B) Calculated electric and magnetic field distributions at the resonant 𝛌 of 1220 nm. (C) SEM image of fabricated WS2 metasurface A on a sapphire substrate. This is our targeted metasurface because it ha… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Low- loss, high-index dielectric metasurfaces made of Si (9), Ge (10) and III-V semiconductors (11,

    Introduction Strong nonlinearities at the nanoscale , such as in subwavelength structures and metasurfaces (1-4, are of paramount importance for applications in nonlinear and quantum optics (5-8). Low- loss, high-index dielectric metasurfaces made of Si (9), Ge (10) and III-V semiconductors (11,

    work page

  2. [2]

    Results 2.1. Design of qBIC WS2 metasurface for tunable SHG In TMDCs, owing to their weak vdWs stiction forces between layers, many salient features of monolayer and bilayers continue to exist even in the bulk form (36). These include spin layer locking (37) and intralayer A-type excitons (𝐸𝑜 𝐴). The SHG in TMDCs is intrinsically enhanced when the inciden...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Owing to many exciting properties (24,48,53), bulk TMDCs offer the most promising avenue to date to subwavelength solid-state devices for tunable nonlinear optics (39)

    Discussion In contrast to artificially stacked hybrid systems (monolayer coupled to other dielectric metasurfaces (38,50,51), bulk TMDCs naturally provide a cleaner system and an exciting opportunity to explore strong interactions between inelastic (excitonic properties) and elastic scattering properties (such as high -Q qBICs) (46,48,52). Owing to many e...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Y. K. Koshelev, Kirill, Sergey Lepeshov, Mingkai Liu, Andrey Bogdanov, Asymmetric metasurfaces with high-Q resonances governed by bound states in the continuum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 193903 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Y. S. K. Rybin, Mikhail V., Kirill L. Koshelev, Zarina F. Sadrieva, Kirill B. Samusev, Andrey A. Bogdanov, Mikhail F. Limonov, High -Q supercavity modes in subwavelength dielectric resonators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 243901 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    A. F. Koshelev, Kirill, Gael Favraud, Andrey Bogdanov, Yuri Kivshar, Nonradiating photonics with resonant dielectric nanostructures. Nanophotonics. 8, 725–745 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Y. K. Kruk, Sergey, Functional meta -optics and nanophotonics governed by Mie resonances. ACS Photonics. 4, 2638–2649 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Koshelev, S

    K. Koshelev, S. Kruk, E. Melik -Gaykazyan, J. H. Choi, A. Bogdanov, H. G. Park, Y. Kivshar, Subwavelength dielectric resonators for nonlinear nanophotonics. Science, 367, 6475, 288-292, (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Y. K. Koshelev, Kirill, Yutao Tang, Kingfai Li, Duk-Yong Choi, Guixin Li, Nonlinear metasurfaces governed by bound states in the continuum. ACS Photonics. 6, 1639–1644 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Y. K. Koshelev, Kirill, Andrey Bogdanov, Meta -optics and bound states in the continuum. Sci. Bull. 64, 836–842 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    Y. K. Carletti, Luca, Sergey S. Kruk, Andrey A. Bogdanov, Costantino De Angelis, High-harmonic generation at the nanoscale boosted by bound states in the continuum. Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 023016 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    However, most of the demonstrations reported to date have been focused on passive devices (7-16)

    are often the materials of choice for enhancing the nonlinear response at the nanoscale. However, most of the demonstrations reported to date have been focused on passive devices (7-16). Following the current need for industrial applications such as dynamic nonlinear holograph...

  5. [13]

    T. Z. Schlickriede, Christian, Sergey S. Kruk, Lei Wang, Basudeb Sain, Yuri Kivshar, Nonlinear imaging with all-dielectric metasurfaces. Nano Lett. 20, 4370–4376 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Grinblat, Y

    G. Grinblat, Y. Li, M. P. Nielsen, R. F. Oulton, S. A. Maier, Efficient Third Harmonic Generation and Nonlinear Subwavelength Imaging at a Higher-Order Anapole Mode in a Single Germanium Nanodisk. ACS Nano, 11, 1, 953-960, (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    S. Liu, M. B. Sinclair, S. Saravi, G. A. Keeler, Y. Yang, J. Reno, G. M. Peake, F. Setzpfandt, I. Staude, T. Pertsch, I. Brener, Resonantly Enhanced Second -Harmonic Generation Using III -V Semiconductor All -Dielectric Metasurfaces. Nano Lett. 16, 5426–5432 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    Camacho-Morales, M

    R. Camacho-Morales, M. Rahmani, S. Kruk, L. Wang, L. Xu, D. A. Smirnova, A. S. Solntsev, A. Miroshnichenko, H. H. Tan, F. Karouta, S. Naureen, K. Vora, L. Carletti, C. De Angelis, C. Jagadish, Y. S. Kivshar, D. N. Neshev, Nonlinear Generation of Vector Beams from AlGaAs Nanoan...

    2016

  9. [17]

    H. A. Yesilkoy, Filiz, Eduardo R. Arvelo, Yasaman Jahani, Mingkai Liu, Andreas Tittl, Volkan Cevher, Yuri Kivshar, Ultrasensitive hyperspectral imaging and biodetection enabled by dielectric metasurfaces. Nat. Photonics. 13, 390–396 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    D. P. et al Kravtsov, Vasily, Ekaterina Khestanova, Fedor A. Benimetskiy, Tatiana Ivanova, Anton K. Samusev, Ivan S. Sinev, Nonlinear polaritons in a monolayer semiconductor coupled to optical bound states in the continuum. Light Sci. Appl. 9, 1–8 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    W. W. Xie, Peng, Zhengchen Liang, Tongtong Jia, Daimin Li, Yixuan Chen, Peijie Chang, Hong Zhang, Strong coupling between excitons in a two -dimensional atomic crystal and quasibound states in the continuum in a two -dimensional all -dielectric asymmetric metasurface. Phys. Re...

    2021

  12. [20]

    J. Z. Yinong Xie, Qianting Chen, Jin Yao, Xueying Liu, Zhaogang Dong, Dielectric metasurface evolution from bulk to monolayer by strong coupling of quasi -BICs for second harmonic boosting. Photonics Res. 12, 784–792 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    J. S. H. Li, Zhipeng, Xi Tian, Cheng -Wei Qiu, Metasurfaces for bioelectronics and healthcare. Nat. Electron., 1–10 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    Schwarz, Mapping the world in 3D

    B. Schwarz, Mapping the world in 3D. Nat. Photonics. 4, 429–430 (2010)

    2010

  15. [23]

    C., Belkin, M

    Yu, J., Park, S., Hwang, I., Kim, D., Demmerle, F., Boehm, G., Amann M. C., Belkin, M. A., Lee, J. Electrically tunable nonlinear polaritonic metasurface. Nat. Photon. 16, 72–78 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    Krasnok, M

    A. Krasnok, M. Tymchenko, A. Alù, Nonlinear metasurfaces: a paradigm shift in nonlinear optics. Mater. Today, 21, 1, 8-21, (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    T. Z. Li, Guixin, Shuang Zhang, Nonlinear photonic metasurfaces. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 1–14 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    S. A. M. & A. T. Thomas Weber, Lucca Kühner, Luca Sortino, Amine Ben Mhenni, Nathan P. Wilson, Julius Kühne, Jonathan J. Finley, Intrinsic strong light -matter coupling with self -hybridized bound states in the continuum in van der Waals metasurfaces. Nat. Mater. 22, 970–976 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    K. M. Das, Sarthak, Garima Gupta, Layer degree of freedom for excitons in transition metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B. 99, 165411 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    Interlayer excitons in a bulk van der Waals semiconductor

    Arora A, Drüppel M, Schmidt R, Deilmann T, Schneider R, Molas MR, Marauhn P, Michaelis de Vasconcellos S, Potemski M, Rohlfing M, Bratschitsch R. Interlayer excitons in a bulk van der Waals semiconductor. Nature Communications. 8, 639 (2017)

    2017

  21. [29]

    S. A. C. Stier, Andreas V., Nathan P. Wilson, Genevieve Clark, Xiaodong Xu, Probing the influence of dielectric environment on excitons in monolayer WSe2: insight from high magnetic fields. Nano Lett. 16, 7054–7060 (2016)

    2016

  22. [30]

    T. F. H. Aslan, Ozgur Burak, Minda Deng, Strain tuning of excitons in monolayer WSe2. Phys. Rev. B. 98, 115308 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    van de Groep, J

    J. van de Groep, J. H. Song, U. Celano, Q. Li, P. G. Kik, M. L. Brongersma, Exciton resonance tuning of an atomically thin lens. Nat. Photonics, 14, 426-430 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    X. X. Seyler, Kyle L., John R. Schaibley, Pu Gong, Pasqual Rivera, Aaron M. Jones, Sanfeng Wu, Jiaqiang Yan, David G. Mandrus, Wang Yao, Electrical control of second- harmonic generation in a WSe 2 monolayer transistor. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 407–411 (2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    J. et al. Liu, HL., Yang, T., Chen, Temperature -dependent optical constants of monolayer MoS2, MoSe2, WS2, and WSe2: spectroscopic ellipsometry and first - principles calculations. Sci. Rep. 10, 15282 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Science, 377, 991- 995 (2022)

    Santiago-Cruz T, Gennaro SD, Mitrofanov O, Addamane S, Reno J, Brener I, Chekhova MV, Resonant metasurfaces for generating complex quantum states. Science, 377, 991- 995 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    B. U. Wang, Gang, Xavier Marie, I. Gerber, Thierry Amand, Delphine Lagarde, Louis Bouet, M. Vidal, Andrea Balocchi, Giant enhancement of the optical second -harmonic emission of WSe2 monolayers by laser excitation at exciton resonances. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 097403 (2015)

    2015

  28. [36]

    J. M. L. Lin, Kai -Qiang, Sebastian Bange, Quantum interference in second -harmonic generation from monolayer WSe2. Nat. Phys. 15, 242–246 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    F. W. Hongmiao Zhou, Meng Qin, Hangsheng Xu, Gangao Wei, Hongju Li, Weiqing Gao, Jianqiang Liu, Photonic spin-controlled self-hybridized exciton-polaritons in WS2 metasurfaces driven by chiral quasibound states in the continuum. Phys. Rev. B . 109, 125201 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    L. et al. Sortino, L., Gale, A., Kühner, Optically addressable spin defects coupled to bound states in the continuum metasurfaces. Nat Commun. 15, 2008 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Verre, D

    R. Verre, D. G. Baranov, B. Munkhbat, J. Cuadra, M. Käll, T. Shegai, Transition metal dichalcogenide nanodisks as high -index dielectric Mie nanoresonators. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 679-683, (2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    Molas, Valley-contrasting optics of interlayer excitons in Mo-and W-based bulk transition metal dichalcogenides

    Arora, Ashish, Thorsten Deilmann, Philipp Marauhn, Matthias Drüppel, Robert Schneider, Maciej R. Molas, Valley-contrasting optics of interlayer excitons in Mo-and W-based bulk transition metal dichalcogenides. Nanoscale. 10, 15571–15577 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    T. F. H. Xu, Xiaodong, Wang Yao, Di Xiao, Spin and pseudospins in layered transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Phys. 10, 343–350 (2014)

    2014

  34. [42]

    A. S. S. Bernhardt, Nils, Kirill Koshelev, Simon JU White, Kelvin Wong Choon Meng, Johannes E. Froch, Sejeong Kim, Toan Trong Tran, Duk -Yong Choi, Yuri Kivshar, Quasi-BIC resonant enhancement of second -harmonic generation in WS 2 monolayers. Nano Lett. 20, 5309–5314 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    Miroshnichenko, Yuerui Lu and Dragomir Neshev, Tunable Unidirectional Nonlinear Emission from Transition -Metal- Dichalcogenide Metasurfaces

    Mudassar Nauman, Jingshi Yan, Domenico de Ceglia, Mohsen Rahmani, Khosro Zangeneh Kamali, Costantino De Angelis, Andrey E. Miroshnichenko, Yuerui Lu and Dragomir Neshev, Tunable Unidirectional Nonlinear Emission from Transition -Metal- Dichalcogenide Metasurfaces. Nat. Commun....

    2021

  36. [44]

    J. L. Liu, Zhuojun, Yi Xu, Ye Lin, Jin Xiang, Tianhua Feng, Qitao Cao, Juntao Li, Sheng Lan, High-Q quasibound states in the continuum for nonlinear metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 253901 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    A. E. M. Feng, Tianhua, Yi Xu, Wei Zhang, Ideal magnetic dipole scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 173901 (2017)

    2017

  38. [46]

    L. K. Anthur, Aravind P., Haizhong Zhang, Ramon Paniagua -Dominguez, Dmitry A. Kalashnikov, Son Tung Ha, Tobias WW Maß, Arseniy I. Kuznetsov, Continuous Wave Second Harmonic Generation Enabled by QuasiBound -States in the Continuum on Gallium Phosphide Metasurfaces. Nano Lett....

    2020

  39. [47]

    K. D. Mobini, Ehsan, Rasoul Alaee, Robert W. Boyd, Giant asymmetric second - harmonic generation in bianisotropic metasurfaces based on bound states in the continuum. ACS Photonics. 8, 3234–3240 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    M. R. Shcherbakov, D. N. Neshev, B. Hopkins, A. S. Shorokhov, I. Staude, E. V. Melik- Gaykazyan, M. Decker, A. A. Ezhov, A. E. Miroshnichenko, I. Brener, A. A. Fedyanin, Y. S. Kivshar, Enhanced third -harmonic generation in silicon nanoparticles driven by magnetic response. Na...

    2014

  41. [49]

    T. S. Munkhbat, Battulga, Denis G. Baranov, Michael St ührenberg, Martin Wers äll, Ankit Bisht, Self -hybridized exciton -polaritons in multilayers of transition metal dichalcogenides for efficient light absorption. ACS Photonics. 6, 139–147 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    D. J. Zhang, Huiqin, Bhaskar Abhiraman, Qing Zhang, Jinshui Miao, Kiyoung Jo, Stefano Roccasecca, Mark W. Knight, Artur R. Davoyan, Hybrid exciton -plasmon- polaritons in van der Waals semiconductor gratings. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–9 (2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    T. S. Verre, Ruggero, Denis G. Baranov, Battulga Munkhbat, Jorge Cuadra, Mikael Käll, Transition metal dichalcogenide nanodisks as high-index dielectric Mie nanoresonators. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 679–683 (2019)

    2019

  44. [52]

    Y. L. Zhu, Yi, Bowen Wang, Ziyuan Li, Jian Zhang, Yilin Tang, Juan F. Torres, Wojciech Lipiński, Lan Fu, A High‐Efficiency Wavelength‐Tunable Monolayer LED with Hybrid Continuous‐Pulsed Injection. Adv. Mater. 33, 2101375 (2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    F. S. Franz J. F. Löchner, Antony George, Kirill Koshelev, Tobias Bucher, Emad Najafidehaghani, Anna Fedotova, Duk -Yong Choi, Thomas Pertsch, Isabelle Staude, Yuri Kivshar, Andrey Turchanin, Hybrid Dielectric Metasurfaces for Enhancing Second-Harmonic Generation in Chemical V...

    2021

  46. [54]

    R. M. Hong PL, Xu L, Dual bound states in the continuum enhanced second harmonic generation with transition metal dichalcogenides monolayer. Opto-Electron Adv . 5, 200097 (2022)

    2022

  47. [55]

    F. et al. Maggiolini, E., Polimeno, L., Todisco, Strongly enhanced light–matter coupling of monolayer WS2 from a bound state in the continuum. Nat. Mater. 22, 964–969 (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    Green, D

    T. Green, D. Baranov, B. Munkhbat, R. Verre, T. Shegai, M. Käll, Optical material anisotropy in high-index transition metal dichalcogenide Mie nanoresonators. Optica, 7, 6, 680-686, (2020). 54 Zheng, Ze, Rocco, Davide, Ren, Hang, Sergaeva, Olga, Zhang, Yipei, Whaley, K. Birgit...

    2020 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.