Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 62 references

Bernstein-Markov measures and Toeplitz theory

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that Toeplitz operators defined from Bernstein-Markov measures on big line bundles form an algebra under composition, and that their spectra equidistribute toward the equilibrium measure.

desk verdict A credible extension of Toeplitz algebra and spectral theory to Bernstein-Markov measures on big line bundles, with a repairable circular reference in the written proof of Theorem 1.7. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.01610 v1 pith:UMGZPUVQ submitted 2025-06-02 math.CV math.AGmath.FAmath.SP

Siarhei Finski This is my paper
classification math.CVmath.AGmath.FAmath.SP MSC 32A2532U1547B35
keywords Bernstein-MarkovmeasuresBergmankernelChristoffel-DarbouxToeplitzoperatorsequilibriummeasurespectralequidistributionbiglinebundlesSzegőlimittheorem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that Toeplitz operators associated with a Bernstein-Markov measure on a compact complex manifold with a big line bundle form an algebra under composition: the product of two such operators is again one, with symbol equal to the product of the symbols. The engine is a new off-diagonal concentration theorem for the Bergman (Christoffel-Darboux) kernel, refining the known diagonal convergence of Bergman measures to the equilibrium measure. From the algebra property the paper derives a Szegő-type spectral equidistribution theorem: the normalized eigenvalue statistics of a Toeplitz operator converge to the integral of the symbol against the equilibrium measure. This unifies and extends classical Toeplitz matrix theory and prior smooth-volume-form results, including recovery of Szegő's first limit theorem and Grenander-Szegő results.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Bergman kernel $B_k(x,y)$, the reproducing kernel of $H^0(X, L^{\otimes k})$ with the $L^2$-product induced by $\mu$, together with the probability measures $\mu_k^{\mathrm{Berg}} = \frac{1}{n_k}\frac{|B_k(x,y)|^2}{(h^L)^k}\,d\mu(x)d\mu(y)$ on $X\times X$. Its pushforward under a projection is the diagonal measure $\frac{1}{n_k}|B_k(x,x)|d\mu(x)$, which links off-diagonal mass to the diagonal asymptotics. The key new estimate shows that the off-diagonal mass between disjoint compact sets vanishes; it is proved by comparing Bergman kernels for a weighted measure $\mu' = \mu\,e^{-g}$ and invoking the known diagonal convergence. In the operator theory, the reproducing identity $B_k\circ B_k = B_k$ and Schatten-norm interpolation convert this concentration into $\|T_k(f)\circ T_k(g) - T_k(fg)\|_p \to 0$.

What would settle it

For an explicit Bernstein-Markov example such as Lebesgue measure on the unit circle, compute $\frac{1}{n_k}\operatorname{Tr}|T_k(f)\circ T_k(g) - T_k(fg)|$ for a continuous pair $f,g$ and check that the limit is zero; or compute the normalized eigenvalue counts for $f(\theta)=\cos\theta$ and compare with $\frac{1}{2\pi}\int g(\cos\theta)\,d\theta$. A nonzero limiting gap in either calculation would refute the paper's main theorems.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, for any Bernstein-Markov measure $\mu$ supported on a compact set $K$ in a compact complex manifold $X$ with a big line bundle $L$, the Bergman measures $\mu_k^{\mathrm{Berg}}$ concentrate along the diagonal and converge weakly to $\Delta_*\mu_{\mathrm{eq}}(K,h^L)$. Consequently the Toeplitz operators $T_k(f)$ form an algebra under composition with an algebra-morphism symbol map, and for any Toeplitz operator with symbol $f$ and any continuous $g$, the average of $g$ over the spectrum of $T_k$ converges to $\int g(f)\,d\mu_{\mathrm{eq}}$. The author states that the novel part is the off-diagonal concentration, built on top of the diagonal Bergman measure convergence due to Berman–Boucksom–Witt Nyström; the paper also extends the results to normal singular spaces via a resolution of singularities.

Load-bearing premise

The paper rests on a previously proved theorem, taken as an input, saying that for Bernstein-Markov measures the diagonal averages of the Bergman kernel converge weakly to the equilibrium measure; if that theorem carries hidden regularity requirements beyond the Bernstein-Markov condition, the off-diagonal concentration, the Toeplitz algebra property, and the spectral equidistribution all collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The space of Toeplitz operators is closed under composition, and the symbol map is an algebra morphism: $T_k(f)\circ T_k(g)$ approximates $T_k(fg)$ in $p$-Schatten norm for every $p \geq 1$.
  • Every Toeplitz operator satisfies Szegő-type spectral equidistribution: $\frac{1}{n_k}\sum_{\lambda\in\operatorname{Spec}(T_k)} g(\lambda) \to \int_X g(f)\,d\mu_{\mathrm{eq}}$, so the asymptotic spectrum depends only on the symbol's values on the equilibrium support $K'$.
  • The classical Szegő first limit theorem for Toeplitz matrices on the circle and the Grenander–Szegő theorems for Toeplitz matrices on $[-1,1]$ are recovered as special cases.
  • The same algebra and spectral results hold on normal compact singular spaces, with the equilibrium measure defined through a resolution of singularities.
  • The symbol map is injective up to equality on the support of the equilibrium measure: a Toeplitz operator uniquely determines its symbol there.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One may expect that off-diagonal mass decays only polynomially (like $k^{-1}$ in the circle example) for general Bernstein-Markov measures, in sharp contrast to exponential decay in the positively curved smooth case; the paper shows exponential decay is impossible in general.
  • The algebra property suggests that Toeplitz operators in this very general setting behave as a quantization of the equilibrium measure, so the method could yield a Berezin-Toeplitz-type calculus for singular or degenerate metrics.
  • A natural testable extension would be to study the commutator $\frac{1}{k}[T_k(f), T_k(g)]$ under Bernstein-Markov measures; the paper leaves open whether a Poisson-bracket limit exists, which would connect to symplectic geometry.
  • Since the result recovers Szegő's theorem for Toeplitz matrices, it likely extends to other classical ensembles such as Bergman polynomials on planar domains, with the equilibrium measure as the limiting zero distribution.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies Toeplitz operators associated with Bernstein--Markov measures on a compact complex manifold X endowed with a big line bundle L. Its main results are: (i) Theorem 1.1, which proves the off-diagonal concentration of the Bergman measures μ_k^Berg, refining the diagonal convergence of Berman--Boucksom--Witt Nyström; (ii) Theorem 1.5, which shows that the space of Toeplitz operators is an algebra under composition with a well-defined symbol map; and (iii) Theorem 1.7, a Szegő-type spectral equidistribution theorem for these operators. The paper also specializes these results to classical Toeplitz matrices and orthogonal polynomials in Section 4, and extends the diagonal and off-diagonal asymptotics to singular spaces in Section 5.

Significance. If correct, the paper provides a substantial unification of classical Toeplitz matrix theory and complex-geometric Toeplitz operator theory, under the very general hypothesis of a Bernstein--Markov measure on a big line bundle. The main technical novelty is the off-diagonal concentration estimate (Theorem 1.1), which is obtained from the external diagonal convergence theorem [9, Theorem B] and is used to derive the algebraic and spectral results. The recovery of Szegő's first limit theorem and Grenander--Szegő results in Section 4, and the extension to singular spaces in Section 5, are valuable and clearly presented. The dependence on the deep external theorem [9] is explicitly acknowledged; the paper's contribution is the off-diagonal analysis and its consequences. Overall, the results are significant for pluripotential theory and the asymptotic analysis of Bergman kernels.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3, Lemma 3.5] The proof of Lemma 3.5 contains a circular reference: it ends with 'The result now follows from Theorem 1.7 and (2.4)', but Theorem 1.7 is proved immediately afterward using Lemma 3.5 ('The result now follows immediately from Corollary 3.4 and Lemma 3.5'). Since Lemma 3.5 is also used in Proposition 3.6 (the well-definedness of the symbol map) and in the proof of Theorem 1.7 itself, this circularity must be removed. The correction is immediate: equation (3.10) gives Tr[T_k(f)] = ∫ f(x)|B_k(x,x)|dμ(x); dividing by n_k and using (2.4) reduces the claim to Theorem 2.2, which gives exactly the desired limit. This is a local fix, but it is logically necessary.
  2. [§4, Theorem 4.1 and Example 1] There is an off-by-one discrepancy between the dimension of H^0(P^1,O(k)), which is k+1, and the Toeplitz matrix (4.3), which is k×k, as well as the orthonormal basis z^i with i=0,...,k-1 in Example 1. Consequently, Theorem 4.1 uses a 1/k normalization, whereas the general framework of the paper would use 1/n_k = 1/(k+1). This is a notational inconsistency rather than a mathematical error, since the asymptotic limits are unchanged, but it should be corrected for consistency, for instance by shifting the index of the tensor power or by using dimension k+1 throughout the classical examples.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§2, proof of Theorem 2.1] The name 'Cauchy-Schwartz' appearing around (2.15) is a typo; it should be 'Cauchy-Schwarz'.
  2. [§2, Example 1 and §4] The paper refers to 'Lebesgue measure on S^1' without specifying its normalization. The orthonormality of the monomial basis z^i stated in Example 1 holds only if μ is the uniform probability measure on S^1; this normalization should be stated explicitly.
  3. [§3, proof of Lemma 3.5] In addition to the circular citation, the proof would read more clearly if the direct derivation from (3.10), (2.4), and Theorem 2.2 were written out instead of citing Theorem 1.7.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Proof of Theorem 1.7 is circular as written: Lemma 3.5's proof invokes Theorem 1.7, whose proof then invokes Lemma 3.5; the loop is repairable directly from Theorem 2.2.

  1. other [Section 3, Lemma 3.5 proof and Proof of Theorem 1.7]
    "Lemma 3.5: 'We will need the following lemma, which – although a special case of Theorem 1.7 – is actually used in its proof.' Its proof ends: 'The result now follows from Theorem 1.7 and (2.4).' Theorem 1.7's proof reads: 'The result now follows immediately from Corollary 3.4 and Lemma 3.5.'"

    Lemma 3.5, which states (1/n_k)Tr[T_k(f)] → ∫ f dµ_eq(K,h^L), is exactly the special case g(x)=x of Theorem 1.7. Its proof invokes Theorem 1.7, while Theorem 1.7's proof invokes Lemma 3.5. Thus, as written, the derivation of Theorem 1.7 is a cycle: the target theorem is used to prove a lemma on which its own proof depends. The cycle is not structurally forced: combining (3.10), (2.4), and the external Theorem 2.2 gives (1/n_k)Tr[T_k(f)] = ∫ f(x) (1/n_k)|B_k(x,x)| dµ(x) → ∫ f dµ_eq(K,h^L) directly, so the circular reference is a local, repairable proof flaw rather than an irreducible dependence. Proposition 3.6 also uses Lemma 3.5, so the gap propagates to the well-definedness of the symbol map unless repaired.

full rationale

The paper contains no parameter fitting, no 'fitted input called prediction', and no load-bearing self-citation chain. Its main geometric input, Theorem 2.2, is an external result of Berman–Boucksom–Witt Nyström, quoted as [9, Theorem B]; the paper's novel off-diagonal concentration argument (Theorem 2.1) is built on that external input and is not circular. Theorems 1.1, 1.5, and 1.7 otherwise flow through Theorem 3.1, Corollaries 3.3 and 3.4, and Proposition 3.6 in a non-circular way, with the sole exception of the Lemma 3.5 ↔ Theorem 1.7 loop. Because that loop is explicitly visible in the text and the paper even flags that Lemma 3.5 is a special case of Theorem 1.7, it must be counted as circularity; but because the same lemma admits an immediate direct proof from (3.10), (2.4), and Theorem 2.2, the central claims retain independent content. This is a partial, local circularity rather than a structural one.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the Bernstein-Markov hypothesis, several published deep theorems in pluripotential theory, and the non-pluripolar product construction. There are no fitted free parameters and no newly postulated objects. The only internal logical slip is Lemma 3.5's proof referencing Theorem 1.7, which is a circular citation as written but is trivially repaired by citing Theorem 2.2.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The Bernstein-Markov property (1.2) holds for the fixed measure μ with respect to (K,h^L).
    This is the standing hypothesis of every main theorem; the paper does not prove it for general non-pluripolar measures.
  • standard math Theorem 2.2 from [9]: diagonal Bergman measures converge to the equilibrium measure for Bernstein-Markov measures on big line bundles.
    Central external input used to prove Theorem 1.1 and the Toeplitz results.
  • standard math Non-pluripolar product theory of Boucksom-Eyssidieux-Guedj-Zeriahi defines c_1(L,h^L_K)^n for big line bundles.
    Needed for the equilibrium measure (1.4) when h^L_K has singularities.
  • standard math Zariski's main theorem identifies H^0(X,L^k) with H^0(hat X, π^*L^k) for normal X.
    Used in the proof of Theorem 5.2 on singular normal spaces.
  • standard math A volume form on the resolution is Bernstein-Markov with respect to psh weights, so π^*μ inherits the property by absolute continuity.
    Used in Lemma 5.4; based on [8, Lemma 2.2] and Theorem 5.5.
  • standard math Fujita's theorem guarantees the volume of a big line bundle exists and is positive.
    Used in the definition of vol(L) and the asymptotic dimension n_k ~ vol(L) k^n/n!.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bernstein-Markov measures and Toeplitz theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UMGZPUVQ

@misc{pith2026250601610,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bernstein-Markov measures and Toeplitz theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UMGZPUVQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.01610}
}
read the original abstract

We prove that Toeplitz operators associated with a Bernstein-Markov measure on a compact complex manifold endowed with a big line bundle form an algebra under composition. As an application, we derive a Szeg\H{o}-type spectral equidistribution result for this class of operators. A key component of our approach is the off-diagonal asymptotic analysis of the Bergman kernel, also known as the Christoffel-Darboux kernel.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [9]

    Berman, S

    R. Berman, S. Boucksom, and D. Witt Nystr ¨om. Fekete points and convergence towards equilibrium measures on complex manifolds.Acta Math., 207(1):1–27, 2011

    work page 2011

  2. [1]

    Berezin-Toeplitz operators, Kodaira maps, and random sections

    M. Ancona and Y . Floch. Berezin-Toeplitz operators, Kodaira maps, and random sections, arXiv:2206.15112. 2022

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

  3. [2]

    Bayraktar

    T. Bayraktar. Equidistribution of zeros of random holomorphic sections.Indiana Univ. Math. J., 65(5):1759–1793, 2016

    2016

  4. [3]

    Bayraktar, T

    T. Bayraktar, T. Bloom, and N. Levenberg. Pluripotential theory and convex bodies.Sb. Math., 209(3):352–384, 2018

    work page 2018

  5. [4]

    Bedford and B

    E. Bedford and B. A. Taylor. A new capacity for plurisubharmonic functions.Acta Math., 149:1–40, 1982

    work page 1982

  6. [5]

    Bedford and B

    E. Bedford and B. A. Taylor. The complex equilibrium measure of a symmetric convex set in Rn.Trans. Am. Math. Soc., 294:705–717, 1986

    work page 1986

  7. [6]

    R. Berman. Super Toeplitz operators on line bundles.J. Geom. Anal., 16(1):1–22, 2006

    work page 2006

  8. [7]

    R. Berman. Bergman kernels and equilibrium measures for line bundles over projective manifolds.Am. J. Math., 131(5):1485–1524, 2009

    work page 2009

Show all 62 references
  1. [8]

    Berman and S

    R. Berman and S. Boucksom. Growth of balls of holomorphic sections and energy at equi- librium.Invent. Math., 181(2):337–394, 2010

    2010

  2. [10]

    Berndtsson

    B. Berndtsson. Probability measures associated to geodesics in the space of K ¨ahler metrics. InAlgebraic and analytic microlocal analysis. AAMA, Evanston, Illinois, USA, May 14– 26, 2012 and May 20–24, 2013. Contributions of the workshops, pages 395–419. Cham: Springer, 2018

    2012

  3. [11]

    Bloom and N

    T. Bloom and N. Levenberg. Asymptotics for Christoffel functions of planar measures.J. Anal. Math., 106:353–371, 2008

    2008

  4. [12]

    Bloom and N

    T. Bloom and N. Levenberg. Transfinite diameter notions inC N and integrals of Vander- monde determinants.Ark. Mat., 48(1):17–40, 2010

    2010

  5. [13]

    Bloom, N

    T. Bloom, N. Levenberg, F. Piazzon, and F. Wielonsky. Bernstein-Markov: a survey. Dolomites Res. Notes Approx., 8(2):75–91, 2015

    2015

  6. [14]

    Bordemann, E

    M. Bordemann, E. Meinrenken, and M. Schlichenmaier. Toeplitz quantization of K ¨ahler manifolds andgl(N), N→ ∞limits.Comm. Math. Phys., 165:281–296, 1994

    1994

  7. [15]

    T. Bouche. Sur les in ´egalit´es de Morse holomorphes lorsque la courbure du fibr ´e en droites Bernstein-Markov measures and Toeplitz theory 18 est d´eg´en´er´ee.Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa, 18(4):501–523, 1991

    1991

  8. [16]

    Boucksom, P

    S. Boucksom, P. Eyssidieux, V . Guedj, and A. Zeriahi. Monge-Amp `ere equations in big cohomology classes.Acta Math., 205(2):199–262, 2010

    2010

  9. [17]

    D. Catlin. The Bergman kernel and a theorem of Tian. InProceedings of the 40th Taniguchi symposium, Katata, Japan, June 23–28, 1997, pages 1–23. Boston, MA: Birkh¨auser, 1999

    1997

  10. [18]

    L. Charles. Berezin–Toeplitz operators, a semi-classical approach.Commun. Math. Phys., 239(1-2):1–28, 2003

    2003

  11. [19]

    M. Christ. On the ¯∂equation in weightedL 2 norms inC 1.J. Geom. Anal., 1(3):193–230, 1991

    1991

  12. [20]

    Coman, X

    D. Coman, X. Ma, and G. Marinescu. Equidistribution for sequences of line bundles on normal K¨ahler spaces.Geom. Topol., 21(2):923–962, 2017

    2017

  13. [21]

    Coman, X

    D. Coman, X. Ma, and G. Marinescu. Tian’s theorem for Moishezon spaces.Rev. Roum. Math. Pures Appl., 69(3-4):433–444, 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    Coman and G

    D. Coman and G. Marinescu. Equidistribution results for singular metrics on line bundles. Ann. Sci. ´Ecole Norm. Sup. (4), 48(3):497–536, 2015

    2015

  15. [23]

    X. Dai, K. Liu, and X. Ma. On the asymptotic expansion of bergman kernel.J. Diff. Geom., 72(1):1–41, 2006

    2006

  16. [24]

    Deleporte

    A. Deleporte. Low-energy spectrum of Toeplitz operators: the case of wells.J. Spectr. Theory, 9(1):79–125, 2019

    2019

  17. [25]

    Demailly.Complex Analytic and Differential Geometry

    J.-P. Demailly.Complex Analytic and Differential Geometry. 2012

    2012

  18. [26]

    T.-C. Dinh, X. Ma, and V .-A. Nguy ˆen. Equidistribution speed for Fekete points associated with an ample line bundle.Ann. Sci. ´Ec. Norm. Sup´er. (4), 50(3):545–578, 2017

    2017

  19. [27]

    Donnelly

    H. Donnelly. Spectral theory for tensor products of hermitian holomorphic line bundles. Mathematische Zeitschrift, 245:31–35, 2003

    2003

  20. [28]

    Drewitz, B

    A. Drewitz, B. Liu, and G. Marinescu. Toeplitz operators and zeros of square-integrable random holomorphic sections, arXiv:2404.15983. 2024

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    S. Finski. On Monge-Amp `ere volumes of direct images, rnab058, 24 p.Int. Math. Res. Not., 2021

    2021

  22. [30]

    S. Finski. Lower bounds on fibered Yang-Mills functionals: generic nefness and semistability of direct images, arXiv:2402.08598, to appear in Anal. PDE. 2024

    2024

  23. [31]

    S. Finski. Toeplitz operators, submultiplicative filtrations and weighted Bergman kernels, arXiv: 2411.05566. 2024

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    S. Finski. Small eigenvalues of Toeplitz operators, Lebesgue envelopes and Mabuchi geom- etry, arXiv:2502.01554, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  25. [33]

    T. Fujita. Approximating Zariski decomposition of big line bundles.Kodai Math. J., 17(1):1– 3, 1994

    1994

  26. [34]

    Galasso and C.-Y

    A. Galasso and C.-Y . Hsiao. Functional calculus and quantization commutes with reduction for Toeplitz operators on CR manifolds.Math. Z., 308(1):40, 2024. Id/No 5

    2024

  27. [35]

    Grenander and G

    U. Grenander and G. Szeg ¨o.Toeplitz forms and their applications. 2nd ed. New York: Chelsea Publishing Company., 1984. Bernstein-Markov measures and Toeplitz theory 19

    1984

  28. [36]

    Guedj and A

    V . Guedj and A. Zeriahi. Intrinsic capacities on compact K ¨ahler manifolds.J. Geom. Anal., 15(4):607–639, 2005

    2005

  29. [37]

    Guedj and A

    V . Guedj and A. Zeriahi.Degenerate complex Monge-Amp `ere equations, volume 26 ofEMS Tracts Math.Z ¨urich: European Mathematical Society (EMS), 2017

    2017

  30. [38]

    Herrmann, C.-Y

    H. Herrmann, C.-Y . Hsiao, G. Marinescu, and W.-C. Shen. Semi-classical spectral asymp- totics of Toeplitz operators on CR manifolds, arXiv:2303.17319. 2023

    2023 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Boutet de Monvel and V

    L. Boutet de Monvel and V . Guillemin.The Spectral Theory of Toeplitz Operators. Princeton University Press, 1981

    1981

  32. [40]

    Lazarsfeld.Positivity in algebraic geometry

    R. Lazarsfeld.Positivity in algebraic geometry. I. Classical setting: line bundles and linear series, volume 48 ofErgeb. Math. Grenzgeb., 3. Folge. Berlin: Springer, 2004

    2004

  33. [41]

    M. Lundin. The extremal psh for the complement of convex, symmetric subsets ofRN.Mich. Math. J., 32:197–201, 1985

    1985

  34. [42]

    Ma and G

    X. Ma and G. Marinescu.Holomorphic Morse inequalities and Bergman kernels, volume 254 ofProgr. Math.Birkh ¨auser Verlag Basel, 2007

    2007

  35. [43]

    Ma and G

    X. Ma and G. Marinescu. Generalized Bergman kernels on symplectic manifolds.Adv. Math., 217(4):1756–1815, 2008

    2008

  36. [44]

    Ma and G

    X. Ma and G. Marinescu. Berezin-Toeplitz quantization on K ¨ahler manifolds.J. Reine Angew. Math., 662:1–56, 2012

    2012

  37. [45]

    Ma and G

    X. Ma and G. Marinescu. Exponential estimate for the asymptotics of Bergman kernels. Math. Ann., 362(3-4):1327–1347, 2015

    2015

  38. [46]

    Ma and W

    X. Ma and W. Zhang. Superconnection and family Bergman kernels.C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 344(1):41 – 44, 2007

    2007

  39. [47]

    Ma and W

    X. Ma and W. Zhang. Superconnection and family Bergman kernels.Math. Ann., 386(3- 4):2207–2253, 2023

    2023

  40. [48]

    Marinescu and N

    G. Marinescu and N. Savale. Bochner Laplacian and Bergman kernel expansion of semi- positive line bundles on a Riemann surface.Math. Ann., 389(4):4083–4124, 2024

    2024

  41. [49]

    Marinescu and D.-V

    G. Marinescu and D.-V . Vu. Bergman kernel functions associated to measures supported on totally real submanifolds.J. Reine Angew. Math., 810:217–251, 2024

    2024

  42. [50]

    Marinescu and D.-V

    G. Marinescu and D.-V . Vu. A survey on asymptotic equilibrium distribution of zeros of random holomorphic sections, arXiv:2504.15083. 2025

    2025 arXiv

  43. [51]

    P. G. Nevai.Orthogonal polynomials, volume 213 ofMem. Am. Math. Soc.Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society (AMS), 1979

    1979

  44. [52]

    Nikolski.Matrices et op ´erateurs de Toeplitz, volume 116

    N. Nikolski.Matrices et op ´erateurs de Toeplitz, volume 116. Math ´ematiques en Devenir, Paris: Calvage et Mounet, 2017

    2017

  45. [53]

    Sadullaev

    A. Sadullaev. A boundary uniqueness theorem inC n.Mat. Sb., Nov. Ser., 101:568–583, 1976

    1976

  46. [54]

    O. Shabtai. Off-diagonal estimates of partial Bergman kernels onS 1-symmetric K¨ahler man- ifolds, arXiv:2401.15416. 2024

    2024

  47. [55]

    J. Siciak. Extremal plurisubharmonic functions inC n.Ann. Pol. Math., 39:175–211, 1981

    1981

  48. [56]

    J. Siciak. Families of polynomials and determining measures.Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse, Math. (5), 9(2):193–211, 1988. Bernstein-Markov measures and Toeplitz theory 20

    1988

  49. [57]

    G. Szeg ¨o. Ein Grenzwertsatz ¨uber die Toeplitzschen Determinanten einer reellen positiven Funktion.Math. Ann., 76:490–503, 1915

    1915

  50. [58]

    G. Szeg ¨o. On certain Hermitian forms associated with the Fourier series of a positive function. Meddel. Lunds Univ. Mat. Sem. Suppl., pages 228–238, 1952

    1952

  51. [59]

    G. Tian. On a set of polarized K ¨ahler metrics on algebraic manifolds.J. Diff. Geom., 32(1):99–130, 1990

    1990

  52. [60]

    Toeplitz

    O. Toeplitz. Zur Theorie der quadratischen und bilinearen Formen von unendlichvielen Ver¨anderlichen. I. Teil: Theorie derLFormen.Math. Ann., 70:351–376, 1911

    1911

  53. [61]

    Zelditch

    S. Zelditch. Szeg ¨o kernels and a theorem of Tian.Internat. Math. Res. Notices, 6:317–331, 1998

    1998

  54. [62]

    Zelditch

    S. Zelditch. Quantum ergodic sequences and equilibrium measures.Constr. Approx., 47(1):89–118, 2018. SIARHEIFINSKI, CNRS-CMLS, ´ECOLEPOLYTECHNIQUEF-91128 PALAISEAUCEDEX, FRANCE. E-mail:finski.siarhei@gmail.com

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.