Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 114 references

Exploring the potential for kinematically colder HI component as a tracer for star-forming gas in nearby galaxies

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that kinematically narrow, colder components of atomic hydrogen (HI) trace star-forming gas in dwarf galaxies at scales of roughly 500–700 pc, while spiral galaxies show no preferred correlation scale, and that dwarf…

desk verdict Careful and honest HI decomposition study whose headline 500–700 pc claim likely rests on a phase-blind power-spectrum statistic and needs a re-analysis before publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.01620 v1 pith:FV2ADFW7 submitted 2025-06-02 astro-ph.GA

Hye-Jin Park , Andrew J. Battisti , Antoine Marchal , Luca Cortese , Emily Wisnioski , Mark Seibert , Shin-Jeong Kim , Naomi McClure-Griffiths
show 5 more authors
W.J.G. de Blok Kathryn Grasha Barry F. Madore Jeff A. Rich Rachael L. Beaton
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords HI21cmlinecoldneutralmediumkinematicdecompositionGaussiandwarfgalaxiesspiralstarformationgas-phasemetallicity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tests whether kinematically narrow components of atomic hydrogen, extracted from 21 cm emission line profiles, can mark gas that is about to turn molecular and form stars. Using a consistent Bayesian Gaussian decomposition across seven nearby galaxies with metallicities from 0.1 to 1.0 solar, it finds that in dwarf galaxies the narrow HI distribution correlates most strongly with molecular gas and star formation rate surface density at spatial scales of about 500–700 pc, whereas spiral galaxies show no preferred scale. It also finds that the measured narrow HI fraction depends strongly on the physical resolution of the HI data, yet dwarf galaxies still show higher median fractions than spirals even after this effect is considered. The central claim is that cold, narrow HI is a meaningful intermediate phase on the path to star formation, with its visibility and connection to star formation varying by galactic environment.

What carries the argument

The central object is the narrow HI fraction map, f_n = I_narrowHI / I_totalHI, produced by the BAYGAUD-PI Bayesian MCMC Gaussian decomposition of each 21 cm velocity profile. A component is classified as narrow (colder) if the profile requires at least two Gaussians, the component is not the broadest, its velocity dispersion is below 6 km s−1, and its central velocity lies within the bulk-motion range set by a forced single-Gaussian fit. This operational definition is intended to isolate thermally condensing cold neutral medium in emission without requiring rare absorption sightlines. The cross-correlation analysis in Fourier space then compares the power spectra of narrow and broad HI maps with those of molecular gas and star formation rate to identify the spatial scale of maximum correlation.

What would settle it

A direct observational check would compare narrow HI maps against independent cold-gas tracers, such as 21 cm absorption spin temperatures, HI self-absorption, or high-resolution molecular tracers, across many sightlines in one dwarf galaxy. If the narrow components are not preferentially found where the absorption-derived cold neutral medium fraction is high, then the kinematic definition is not tracking physically cold gas.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that a kinematically colder HI component, defined as a non-broadest Gaussian component with velocity dispersion below 6 km s−1 aligned with the bulk gas motion, can be identified consistently across galaxies spanning a wide range of metallicity and physical resolution. In the three dwarf galaxies (Sextans A, NGC 6822, WLM), the narrow HI maps show a moderate positive correlation with both CO-based molecular gas surface density and FUV+MIR star formation rate surface density, peaking at roughly 0.5–0.7 kpc. The four spiral galaxies (NGC 5068, NGC 7793, NGC 1566, NGC 5236) show no such preferred correlation scale, and their narrow HI fraction tends to be lower in metal-rich, high-SFR inner regions. The paper further shows that the median narrow HI fraction, ⟨f_n⟩, rises with better physical resolution and, even after this resolution effect is taken into account, remains higher for dwarf galaxies than for spirals.

Load-bearing premise

The whole analysis treats a Gaussian component with small velocity dispersion that is not the broadest and moves with the bulk gas as a physically colder, thermally condensing phase, but this assignment is never independently verified for most galaxies; the one direct test, using 21 cm absorption in NGC 6822, does not show a spatial correlation with the narrow HI map.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If narrow HI is a genuine pre-star-forming phase, 21 cm emission alone could map the fuel for future star formation in low-metallicity dwarf galaxies where CO is dark and unreliable.
  • The absence of a preferred correlation scale in spirals implies that the spatial link between cold HI and star formation is environmentally dependent, likely governed by metallicity, pressure, and feedback.
  • The strong dependence of the measured narrow HI fraction on physical resolution means that current surveys systematically underestimate cold HI fractions; upcoming high-resolution instruments such as the ngVLA and SKA are needed to recover this phase fully.
  • The lack of spatial correlation between narrow HI and 21 cm absorption-detected cold gas in NGC 6822 cautions that narrow HI maps serve as a statistical tracer of star-forming gas, not a point-by-point map of cold neutral medium mass.
  • Future studies should degrade all HI data to a common physical resolution before comparing narrow HI fractions between galaxies, as this paper does in its appendix, to avoid resolution-driven false trends.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If narrow HI marks the transition to molecular gas, the 500–700 pc correlation peak in dwarfs may correspond to the typical separation between cold HI clouds or their accumulation time before gravitational collapse, and this scale should shift with the galaxy's dynamical state or thermal pressure.
  • The resolution trend in the paper implies that published cold-HI fractions from different surveys are not directly comparable, so future comparisons should include a resolution-degradation test like the one in Appendix A.
  • Applying this decomposition to the outer disks of spirals, where CO is absent but atomic gas dominates, would directly test whether narrow HI works as a universal star-forming gas tracer in the metal-poor regime.
  • The correlation peak scale could be converted into an estimate of the cold HI cloud lifetime before conversion to H2 if paired with a simple model of gas inflow and star formation, turning the maps into a cloud-scale clock.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes HI 21 cm data cubes of seven nearby galaxies (three dwarfs and four spirals) with the Bayesian decomposition tool BAYGAUD-PI, classifying Gaussian components as 'narrow/colder' if they have sigma < 6 km/s, are not the broadest component, and align with the bulk motion of the galaxy. It maps the narrow HI fraction f_n, compares its spatial distribution to molecular gas (CO) and SFR (FUV+MIR), performs a cross-correlation analysis at different spatial scales, and examines radial trends of f_n with metallicity and SFR. The central claims are (v) that dwarf galaxies show the strongest correlation between narrow HI and molecular gas/SFR at ~500-700 pc, and (viii) that dwarfs have higher f_n than spirals even after considering physical resolution. The paper is candid about limitations, including the lack of validation of the kinematic classification against independent cold-gas tracers.

Significance. If the central claim holds, kinematically colder HI components could provide a valuable tracer of star-forming gas in low-metallicity systems where CO is undetectable. The study applies a consistent decomposition methodology across a metallicity range and provides quantitative maps and radial profiles that are useful for future surveys. The classification criteria are a priori and no parameters are fitted to the results, which gives the analysis low circularity. The paper is transparent about limitations, including the lack of direct cold-gas validation and the heterogeneity of the HI data. However, the main correlation result relies on a power-spectrum statistic that does not measure spatial association, and the resolution test used to support the dwarf-spiral comparison is statistically weak. These issues currently prevent the central claims from being accepted as established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 5.2, Fig. 6] The 'cross-correlation' statistic used to support claim (v) is a Pearson correlation between the 2D power spectra of the images, not between the images themselves. Because power spectra discard Fourier phase information, two maps with identical scale/anisotropy content but completely unrelated spatial arrangements would yield a perfect correlation. Thus the ~500-700 pc peak for dwarf galaxies measures similarity in the distribution of Fourier amplitudes, not a spatial association between narrow HI and molecular gas/SFR. The authors should either recompute the analysis with a phase-sensitive statistic (e.g., a real-space cross-correlation of band-filtered maps or a normalized cross-spectrum/coherence) or rewrite the claim to state explicitly that it is a power-spectrum similarity, not a spatial correlation. The y-axis of Fig. 6 (range -1 to +1) is also inconsistent with coherence, which is bounded between 0 and 1.
  2. [Appendix A and Section 6.2] The resolution test on which the 'resolution impacts f_n' claim rests uses only three galaxies and yields bootstrapped Pearson correlation coefficients of -0.29±0.37 (Sextans A), -0.09±0.45 (NGC 7793), and -0.29±0.33 (WLM). These are not significant at even the 1-sigma level, so the statement that 'physical resolution ... can impact the recovery of narrow or colder HI components' is not supported by this test. Since the dwarf-vs-spiral comparison in Section 6.2 and conclusion (viii) relies on 'even considering the physical resolution', this weakens the conclusion that dwarfs have intrinsically higher f_n.
  3. [Section 5.1.1] The only direct test against an independent cold-gas tracer (21-cm absorption in NGC 6822) shows no spatial correlation between absorption-detected cold gas and the narrow HI map. The paper acknowledges this, but the abstract and conclusions still describe narrow HI as a crucial transition phase and a tracer of star-forming gas. The authors should either provide additional validation (e.g., absorption comparisons in more sightlines, or comparison with HI self-absorption) or explicitly temper the claims to reflect that the classification is purely kinematic and not yet validated.
  4. [Section 5.2 and Fig. 6] The cross-correlation curves are presented without any error bars or significance estimates. Given the small number of galaxies and the strong fluctuations of the curves between -0.5 and 0.5, the 'moderate correlation' peaks (r>0.5) in dwarfs need to be accompanied by uncertainties (e.g., bootstrap or Monte Carlo) to establish that they are not noise.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 5.2] The text states that for Sextans A, narrow HI shows moderate correlation with both Sigma_mol and Sigma_SFR at ~0.7 kpc, but Figure 6 indicates 'CO N/A' for Sextans A, so there is no molecular gas map for that galaxy; this inconsistency should be corrected.
  2. [Section 5.2 and Figure 6] The caption uses the term 'cross-correlation' while the method is described as a correlation of power spectra; please define the statistic explicitly and use consistent terminology to avoid ambiguity.
  3. [Section 6.2 and Figure 8(a)] The description of a 'strong decreasing trend' in <f_n> with coarser physical resolution is based on only seven points from heterogeneous datasets; adding a rank correlation coefficient or a linear fit with uncertainties would make the trend more quantitative and less impressionistic.
  4. [Abstract and Conclusion (v)] The statement 'dwarf galaxies exhibit the strongest correlation at ~500-700 pc' should be qualified as a power-spectrum similarity result until the analysis is redone with a spatial statistic, or changed if the conclusion is revised.
  5. [Throughout] The terms 'Hi' and 'H I' are used inconsistently (e.g., 'Hicomponents' without space in the abstract and Section 4.2); please standardize.
  6. [Section 4.2 and Figure 2] The velocity dispersion histogram uses a threshold of 6 km/s, but the justification for this specific value relative to the channel resolution (1.4-2.6 km/s) could be stated more explicitly, since the threshold is only ~2-4 channels wide.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the narrow-HI definition uses fixed a priori thresholds, the correlations are measured against independent tracers, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: (1) decompose HI cubes with BAYGAUD-PI; (2) classify 'narrow' components by fixed criteria (NGauss>=2, not the broadest component, sigma_V<6 km/s, central velocity within mu_sg +/- sigma_sg; Sec. 4.2); (3) construct narrow/broad HI maps and compare them with independent CO and FUV+MIR SFR maps through power-spectrum correlations; (4) measure fn radial trends and median fn against resolution and galaxy properties. No parameter is fitted to the target quantities. The 6 km/s threshold and the bulk-motion filter are set before any correlation is computed, so the claimed 500-700 pc correlation in dwarfs is an empirical outcome rather than an identity. The resolution test in Appendix A degrades real data and re-runs the decomposition, providing an external check rather than a fitted correction. Self-citations to Park et al. (2022) supply only a Gaussian-fitting convention and prior motivation; they do not inject the values of fn or the correlation coefficients. The phase-blind nature of the power-spectrum cross-correlation, noted by a skeptical reader, is a potential validity limitation of what the statistic measures, but it is not a circular reduction: the measured coefficients are not equal to the inputs by construction. No Eq. X = Eq. Y, no fitted-parameter-renamed-as-prediction step, and no load-bearing self-citation chain were found.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated. The main tunable inputs are the velocity threshold, SNR cuts, and maximum Gaussian order, all chosen by hand rather than fitted to the target correlations. The threshold choice directly shapes the narrow HI fraction, so the results are sensitive to it.

free parameters (3)
  • Velocity dispersion threshold for narrow HI = 6 km/s
    Chosen from prior literature (Warren et al. 2012; Braun 1997) to define narrow versus broad components; it directly determines the narrow fraction fn, and no sensitivity test is performed.
  • SNR cuts for Gaussian components = SNRamp > 2, SNRarea > 2
    Adopted to remove spurious components; affects the number of components kept and hence which narrow components survive.
  • Maximum number of Gaussian components = 3 (Sextans A, NGC 6822, WLM, NGC 7793, NGC 5236); 4 (NGC 5068, NGC 1566)
    Set according to data sensitivity and spectral resolution; influences the ability to find narrow components.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption HI 21 cm emission is optically thin (Eq. 10).
    Used to convert integrated intensity to column density and to define fn as an intensity ratio; strong opacity in cold gas would bias narrow HI fractions.
  • domain assumption Observed HI velocity profiles are well described by sums of Gaussians plus a polynomial baseline, with the optimal number selected by Bayes factors (Eq. 8).
    The entire decomposition, and thus the narrow component definition, depends on this model being adequate.
  • ad hoc to paper A narrow component with sigma < 6 km/s, not the broadest, and consistent with bulk motion represents a colder/condensing HI phase.
    This is the paper's central operational definition; it has not been independently validated for most galaxies, and the NGC 6822 absorption comparison shows no correlation.
  • domain assumption SFR from FUV+MIR (Belfiore et al. 2023) and metallicity from Scal (Pilyugin & Grebel 2016) are accurate for these galaxies.
    Used for the correlation and trend analyses; calibration uncertainties could affect the comparisons.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exploring the potential for kinematically colder HI component as a tracer for star-forming gas in nearby galaxies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FV2ADFW7

@misc{pith2026250601620,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exploring the potential for kinematically colder HI component as a tracer for star-forming gas in nearby galaxies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FV2ADFW7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.01620}
}
abstract

Atomic hydrogen (HI) dominates the mass of the cold interstellar medium, undergoing thermal condensation to form molecular gas and fuel star formation. Kinematically colder HI components, identified via kinematic decomposition of HI 21 cm data cubes, serve as a crucial transition phase between diffuse warm neutral gas and molecular hydrogen (H$_{2}$). We analyse these colder HI components by decomposing HI 21 cm data cubes of seven nearby galaxies - Sextans A, NGC 6822, WLM, NGC 5068, NGC 7793, NGC 1566, and NGC 5236 - spanning metallicities (0.1 < $Z/Z_{\odot}$ < 1.0) and physical scales (53-1134 pc). Using a velocity dispersion threshold of 6 km s$^{-1}$, we classify the kinematically distinct components into narrow (colder) and broad (warmer). Cross-correlation analysis between the narrow HI components and H$_{2}$ or star formation rate (SFR) surface density at different spatial scales reveals that dwarf galaxies exhibit the strongest correlation at ~500-700 pc. The radially binned narrow HI fraction, $f_{\rm n} = I_{\rm narrowHI}/I_{\rm totalHI}$, in dwarf galaxies shows no clear trend with metallicity or SFR, while in spirals, $f_{\rm n}$ is lower in inner regions with higher metallicity and SFR. We find that the dataset resolution significantly impacts the results, with higher physical resolution data yielding a higher median $f_{\rm n}$, $\langle f_{\rm n} \rangle$, per galaxy. With this considered, dwarf galaxies consistently exhibit a larger $f_{\rm n}$ than spiral galaxies. These findings highlight the critical role of cold HI in regulating star formation across different galactic environments and emphasise the need for high-resolution HI observations to further unravel the connection between atomic-to-molecular gas conversion and galaxy evolution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.01620 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The map for the optimal number of Hi Gaussian components (NGauss) for our sample galaxies. NGC 5068 and NGC 1566 have up to four components due to the higher sensitivity and spectral resolution of the MHONGOOSE Hi data that allow distinguishing fainter components (see Sec. 4.1). 4 Hi 21 CM LINE KINEMATIC DECOMPOSITION 4.1 BAYGAUD-PI BAYGAUD-PI12 (Oh et al. 2019) is a robust kinematic decomposition tool for Hi 21 cm … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Histogram of velocity dispersion (𝜎V) for decomposed Gaussian components. The bin size is uniformly distributed from 1.4 km s−1 (the lowest 𝜎V among the components across all sample galaxies) in steps of 2 km s−1 up to 39.4 km s−1 . The blue histogram represents the 𝜎V of single-Gaussian fitted components (i.e., NGauss = 1). The grey and green histograms correspond to the broadest 𝜎V components and remaining (narrow… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Demonstration of Gaussian fitting (BAYGAUD-PI) results for the velocity profiles of an arbitrarily chosen region (red box on the left panel) of NGC 5068. The grey solid lines in the right panels show the velocity profiles of individual pixels. The red shaded area represents the Vlos range within which colder, narrow Hi components are identified, defined as 𝜇sg ± 𝜎sg from the forced single Gaussian fit (red solid lin… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left three panels: Hi column density maps of total, narrow and broad Hi components of dwarf galaxies, assuming optically thin medium. The mass fraction relative to the total Hi is shown next to the phase name. Fourth and fifth panels: Molecular gas surface density map …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The cross-correlation analysis for the narrow (green) and broad (orange) Hi components with the molecular gas surface density (left panels) and SFR surface density (right panels) of our sample galaxies. The black solid lines show the cross-correlation between molecular…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Left panels: Radial trends of gas-phase metallicity (12 + log(O/H)), SFR surface density (ΣSFR), and 𝑓n for galaxies. Each point represents the median of regions in each radial bin, with the bins defined by equal numbers of regions. The median measurement uncertainties…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The median 𝑓n and 16% and 84% percentiles for each galaxy as a function of the physical resolution of datasets (a), sensitivity in noise per channel (b), galaxy inclination (c), morphological T-Type (d), integrated gas-phase metallicity (e), and integrated SFR (f). Eac…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    B., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14043.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.392..294A 392, 294

    Agertz O., Lake G., Teyssier R., Moore B., Mayer L., Romeo A. B., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14043.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.392..294A 392, 294

    arXiv 2009

  2. [2]

    R., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2022.3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022PASA...39...10A 39, e010

    Allison J. R., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2022.3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022PASA...39...10A 39, e010

    doi:10.1017/pasa.2022.3 2022

  3. [3]

    Amor \' n R., Mu \ n oz-Tu \ n \'o n C., Aguerri J. A. L., Planesas P., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526397 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...588A..23A 588, A23

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526397 2016

  4. [4]

    T., Gordon K

    Aniano G., Draine B. T., Gordon K. D., Sandstrom K., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1086/662219 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011PASP..123.1218A 123, 1218

    doi:10.1086/662219 2011

  5. [5]

    N., Hunter D

    Archer H. N., Hunter D. A., Elmegreen B. G., Cigan P., Jansen R. A., Windhorst R. A., Hunt L. K., Rubio M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac4e88 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022AJ....163..141A 163, 141

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac4e88 2022

  6. [6]

    Astropy Collaboration et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...558A..33A 558, A33

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  7. [7]

    Astropy Collaboration et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156..123A 156, 123

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f 2018

  8. [8]

    Astropy Collaboration et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...935..167A 935, 167

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 2022

Show all 114 references
  1. [9]

    A., Phillips M

    Baldwin J. A., Phillips M. M., Terlevich R., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1086/130766 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981PASP...93....5B 93, 5

    1981 doi

  2. [10]

    Belfiore F., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202244863 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...670A..67B 670, A67

    2023 doi

  3. [11]

    Bertin E., 2010, SWarp: Resampling and Co-adding FITS Images Together , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1010.068 ( @eprint ascl 1010.068 )

    2010

  4. [12]

    Bigiel F., Leroy A., Seibert M., Walter F., Blitz L., Thilker D., Madore B., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/720/1/L31 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...720L..31B 720, L31

    2010 doi

  5. [13]

    G., Joncas G., Kothes R., Stil J

    Blagrave K., Martin P. G., Joncas G., Kothes R., Stil J. M., Miville-Desch \^e nes M. A., Lockman F. J., Taylor A. R., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/126 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...834..126B 834, 126

    2017 doi

  6. [14]

    Boissier S., Prantzos N., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02699.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999MNRAS.307..857B 307, 857

    1999

  7. [15]

    D., Wolfire M., Leroy A

    Bolatto A. D., Wolfire M., Leroy A. K., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140944 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ARA&A..51..207B 51, 207

    2013 doi

  8. [16]

    Braun R., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/304346 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...484..637B 484, 637

    1997 doi

  9. [17]

    Brown T., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac28f5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJS..257...21B 257, 21

    2021 doi

  10. [18]

    Camps P., Baes M., 2015, @doi [Astronomy and Computing] 10.1016/j.ascom.2014.10.004 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&C.....9...20C 9, 20

    2015 doi

  11. [19]

    Camps P., Baes M., 2020, @doi [Astronomy and Computing] 10.1016/j.ascom.2020.100381 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&C....3100381C 31, 100381

    2020

  12. [20]

    Choi W., Kim C.-G., Chung A., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac82ba , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...936..133C 936, 133

    2022 doi

  13. [21]

    Clark C. J. R., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731419 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...609A..37C 609, A37

    2018 doi

  14. [22]

    O., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1580 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.445..881C 445, 881

    Cook D. O., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1580 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.445..881C 445, 881

    2014 doi

  15. [23]

    M., et al., 2003, 2MASS All Sky Catalog of point sources

    Cutri R. M., et al., 2003, 2MASS All Sky Catalog of point sources

    2003

  16. [24]

    De Vis P., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx981 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.471.1743D 471, 1743

    2017 doi

  17. [25]

    Dempsey J., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2022.18 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022PASA...39...34D 39, e034

    2022 doi

  18. [26]

    M., Mebold U., Stanimirovic S., Staveley-Smith L., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308953 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...536..756D 536, 756

    Dickey J. M., Mebold U., Stanimirovic S., Staveley-Smith L., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308953 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...536..756D 536, 756

    2000 doi

  19. [27]

    C., Skillman E

    Dohm-Palmer R. C., Skillman E. D., Mateo M., Saha A., Dolphin A., Tolstoy E., Gallagher J. S., Cole A. A., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/324635 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AJ....123..813D 123, 813

    2002 doi

  20. [28]

    R., Walter F., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/136/1/479 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ....136..479D 136, 479

    Dong H., Calzetti D., Regan M., Thilker D., Bianchi L., Meurer G. R., Walter F., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/136/1/479 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ....136..479D 136, 479

    2008 doi

  21. [29]

    T., 2011, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium

    Draine B. T., 2011, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium

    2011

  22. [30]

    Elagali A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1448 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487.2797E 487, 2797

    2019 doi

  23. [31]

    G., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/172816 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...411..170E 411, 170

    Elmegreen B. G., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/172816 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...411..170E 411, 170

    1993 doi

  24. [32]

    G., Elmegreen D

    Elmegreen B. G., Elmegreen D. M., Leitner S. N., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/374860 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...590..271E 590, 271

    2003 doi

  25. [33]

    L., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/316293 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999PASP..111...63F 111, 63

    Fitzpatrick E. L., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/316293 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999PASP..111...63F 111, 63

    1999 doi

  26. [34]

    Gaia Collaboration et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629272 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...595A...1G 595, A1

    2016 doi

  27. [35]

    Gaia Collaboration et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...674A...1G 674, A1

    2023 doi

  28. [36]

    Garcia M., Herrero A., Najarro F., Camacho I., Lorenzo M., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty3503 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.484..422G 484, 422

    2019 doi

  29. [37]

    Gil de Paz A., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/516636 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJS..173..185G 173, 185

    2007 doi

  30. [38]

    Grasha K., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5ab2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...929..118G 929, 118

    2022 doi

  31. [39]

    C., Johnson B

    Hao C.-N., Kennicutt R. C., Johnson B. D., Calzetti D., Dale D. A., Moustakas J., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/741/2/124 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...741..124H 741, 124

    2011 doi

  32. [40]

    R., et al., 2020, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 , 585, 357

    Harris C. R., et al., 2020, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 , 585, 357

    2020 doi

  33. [41]

    Healy J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347475 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...687A.254H 687, A254

    2024 doi

  34. [42]

    T., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s10509-016-2865-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016Ap&SS.361..280H 361, 280

    Ho I. T., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s10509-016-2865-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016Ap&SS.361..280H 361, 280

    2016 doi

  35. [43]

    Honma M., Sofue Y., Arimoto N., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9507099 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995A&A...304....1H 304, 1

    1995 doi arXiv

  36. [44]

    Hu C.-Y., Naab T., Walch S., Glover S. C. O., Clark P. C., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw544 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.458.3528H 458, 3528

    2016 doi

  37. [45]

    F., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac65fd , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...931...28H 931, 28

    Hu C.-Y., Schruba A., Sternberg A., van Dishoeck E. F., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac65fd , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...931...28H 931, 28

    2022 doi

  38. [46]

    D., 2007, @doi [Computing in Science & Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 , 9, 90

    Hunter J. D., 2007, @doi [Computing in Science & Engineering] 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 , 9, 90

    2007 doi

  39. [47]

    A., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/144/5/134 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AJ....144..134H 144, 134

    Hunter D. A., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/144/5/134 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AJ....144..134H 144, 134

    2012 doi

  40. [48]

    A., Elmegreen B

    Hunter D. A., Elmegreen B. G., Madden S. C., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-052722-104109 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ARA&A..62..113H 62, 113

    2024 doi

  41. [49]

    Ianjamasimanana R., de Blok W. J. G., Walter F., Heald G. H., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/144/4/96 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AJ....144...96I 144, 96

    2012 doi

  42. [50]

    E., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab3576 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJS..244....7J 244, 7

    Jameson K. E., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab3576 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJS..244....7J 244, 7

    2019 doi

  43. [51]

    M., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200811081 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...497..703K 497, 703

    Karampelas A., Dapergolas A., Kontizas E., Livanou E., Kontizas M., Bellas-Velidis I., V \' lchez J. M., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200811081 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...497..703K 497, 703

    2009 doi

  44. [52]

    Kauffmann G., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.346.1055K 346, 1055

    2003

  45. [53]

    C., Evans N

    Kennicutt R. C., Evans N. J., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ARA&A..50..531K 50, 531

    2012 doi

  46. [54]

    Kim J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aca90a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...944L..20K 944, L20

    2023 doi

  47. [55]

    W., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab981 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.504.1801K 504, 1801

    Koch E. W., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab981 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.504.1801K 504, 1801

    2021 doi

  48. [56]

    Kruijssen J. M. D., Longmore S. N., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu098 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.439.3239K 439, 3239

    2014 doi

  49. [57]

    Lang P., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9953 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...897..122L 897, 122

    2020 doi

  50. [58]

    Lee B., Chung A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aae4d9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...866L..10L 866, L10

    2018 doi

  51. [59]

    K., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab3925 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJS..244...24L 244, 24

    Leroy A. K., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab3925 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJS..244...24L 244, 24

    2019 doi

  52. [60]

    K., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac17f3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJS..257...43L 257, 43

    Leroy A. K., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac17f3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJS..257...43L 257, 43

    2021 doi

  53. [61]

    Lynn C., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2818 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.536.3538L 536, 3538

    2025 doi

  54. [62]

    M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202449441 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...690A..69M 690, A69

    Maccagni F. M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202449441 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...690A..69M 690, A69

    2024 doi

  55. [63]

    C., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/671138 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125..600M 125, 600

    Madden S. C., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/671138 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125..600M 125, 600

    2013 doi

  56. [64]

    C., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038860 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...643A.141M 643, A141

    Madden S. C., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038860 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...643A.141M 643, A141

    2020 doi

  57. [65]

    Makarov D., Prugniel P., Terekhova N., Courtois H., Vauglin I., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423496 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A

    2014 doi

  58. [66]

    R., Salom \'e Q., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935335 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...626A.101M 626, A101

    Marchal A., Miville-Desch \^e nes M.-A., Orieux F., Gac N., Soussen C., Lesot M.-J., d'Allonnes A. R., Salom \'e Q., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935335 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...626A.101M 626, A101

    2019 doi

  59. [67]

    G., Gong M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0e9d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...921...11M 921, 11

    Marchal A., Martin P. G., Gong M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0e9d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...921...11M 921, 11

    2021 doi

  60. [68]

    G., Blagrave K

    Martin P. G., Blagrave K. P. M., Lockman F. J., Pinheiro Gon c alves D., Boothroyd A. I., Joncas G., Miville-Desch \^e nes M. A., Stephan G., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/809/2/153 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...809..153M 809, 153

    2015 doi

  61. [69]

    L., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.435 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ARA&A..36..435M 36, 435

    Mateo M. L., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.435 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ARA&A..36..435M 36, 435

    1998 doi

  62. [70]

    M., Stanimirovi \'c S., Rybarczyk D

    McClure-Griffiths N. M., Stanimirovi \'c S., Rybarczyk D. R., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-104851 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ARA&A..61...19M 61, 19

    2023 doi

  63. [71]

    J., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3958 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.501.5121M 501, 5121

    Mercado F. J., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3958 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.501.5121M 501, 5121

    2021 doi

  64. [72]

    A., Lagache G., Puget J

    Miville-Desch \^e nes M. A., Lagache G., Puget J. L., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20020929 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002A&A...393..749M 393, 749

    2002 doi

  65. [73]

    E., Stanimirovi \'c S., Goss W

    Murray C. E., Stanimirovi \'c S., Goss W. M., Heiles C., Dickey J. M., Babler B., Kim C.-G., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aad81a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJS..238...14M 238, 14

    2018 doi

  66. [74]

    Namumba B., Carignan C., Passmoor S., de Blok W. J. G., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2256 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.472.3761N 472, 3761

    2017 doi

  67. [75]

    Namumba B., Carignan C., Passmoor S., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1056 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.478..487N 478, 487

    2018 doi

  68. [76]

    R., Ostriker E

    Narayanan D., Krumholz M. R., Ostriker E. C., Hernquist L., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20536.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.421.3127N 421, 3127

    2012

  69. [77]

    Nguyen H., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2274 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.534.3478N 534, 3478

    2024 doi

  70. [78]

    Oh S.-H., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/149/6/180 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AJ....149..180O 149, 180

    2015 doi

  71. [79]

    Oh S.-H., Staveley-Smith L., For B.-Q., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz710 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.485.5021O 485, 5021

    2019 doi

  72. [80]

    Oh S.-H., Kim S., For B.-Q., Staveley-Smith L., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5905 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...928..177O 928, 177

    2022 doi

  73. [81]

    E., 1989, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    Osterbrock D. E., 1989, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    1989

  74. [82]

    Ott J., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/144/4/123 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AJ....144..123O 144, 123

    2012 doi

  75. [83]

    Park H.-J., Oh S.-H., Wang J., Zheng Y., Zhang H.-X., De Blok W. J. G., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac7c1b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022AJ....164...82P 164, 82

    2022 doi

  76. [84]

    Park H.-J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2298 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.535..729P 535, 729

    2024 doi

  77. [85]

    S., Grebel E

    Pilyugin L. S., Grebel E. K., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw238 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.457.3678P 457, 3678

    2016 doi

  78. [86]

    M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6604 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...974...93P 974, 93

    Pingel N. M., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6604 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...974...93P 974, 93

    2024 doi

  79. [87]

    E., Orr M

    Porter L. E., Orr M. E., Burkhart B., Wetzel A., Ma X., Hopkins P. F., Emerick A., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1958 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.515.3555P 515, 3555

    2022 doi

  80. [88]

    G., Hunter D

    Rubio M., Elmegreen B. G., Hunter D. A., Brinks E., Cort \'e s J. R., Cigan P., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature14901 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Natur.525..218R 525, 218

    2015 doi

  81. [89]

    N., Roy N., Jog C

    Saikia G., Patra N. N., Roy N., Jog C. J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3635 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.492.2517S 492, 2517

    2020 doi

  82. [90]

    K., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-052651 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ARA&A..62..369S 62, 369

    Schinnerer E., Leroy A. K., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-052651 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ARA&A..62..369S 62, 369

    2024 doi

  83. [91]

    F., Finkbeiner D

    Schlafly E. F., Finkbeiner D. P., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...737..103S 737, 103

    2011 doi

  84. [92]

    K., Walter F., Sandstrom K., Rosolowsky E., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/722/2/1699 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...722.1699S 722, 1699

    Schruba A., Leroy A. K., Walter F., Sandstrom K., Rosolowsky E., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/722/2/1699 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...722.1699S 722, 1699

    2010 doi

  85. [93]

    Schruba A., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/278 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...835..278S 835, 278

    2017 doi

  86. [94]

    D., Girichidis P., W \"u nsch R., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac607 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512.4765S 512, 4765

    Seifried D., Beuther H., Walch S., Syed J., Soler J. D., Girichidis P., W \"u nsch R., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac607 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512.4765S 512, 4765

    2022 doi

  87. [95]

    Shi Y., Wang J., Zhang Z.-Y., Gao Y., Armus L., Helou G., Gu Q., Stierwalt S., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/804/1/L11 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...804L..11S 804, L11

    2015 doi

  88. [96]

    D., Terlevich R., Teuben P

    Skillman E. D., Terlevich R., Teuben P. J., van Woerden H., 1988, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988A&A...198...33S 198, 33

    1988

  89. [97]

    J., Zeippen C

    Storey P. J., Zeippen C. J., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03184.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.312..813S 312, 813

    2000

  90. [98]

    J., Genzel R., Sternberg A., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141034 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ARA&A..58..157T 58, 157

    Tacconi L. J., Genzel R., Sternberg A., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141034 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ARA&A..58..157T 58, 157

    2020 doi

  91. [99]

    A., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/425251 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...619L..79T 619, L79

    Thilker D. A., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/425251 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...619L..79T 619, L79

    2005 doi

  92. [100]

    Verstocken S., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935770 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...637A..24V 637, A24

    2020 doi

  93. [101]

    Virtanen P., et al., 2020, @doi [Nature Methods] 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 , https://rdcu.be/b08Wh 17, 261

    2020 doi

  94. [102]

    Walter F., Brinks E., de Blok W. J. G., Bigiel F., Kennicutt Jr. R. C., Thornley M. D., Leroy A., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2563 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ....136.2563W 136, 2563

    2008 doi

  95. [103]

    R., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/84 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...757...84W 757, 84

    Warren S. R., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/84 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...757...84W 757, 84

    2012 doi

  96. [104]

    L., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....140.1868W 140, 1868

    Wright E. L., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....140.1868W 140, 1868

    2010 doi

  97. [105]

    M., van Zee L., Lo K

    Young L. M., van Zee L., Lo K. Y., Dohm-Palmer R. C., Beierle M. E., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/375581 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...592..111Y 592, 111

    2003 doi

  98. [106]

    de Blok W. J. G., Walter F., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312777 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...537L..95D 537, L95

    2000 doi

  99. [107]

    de Blok W. J. G., Walter F., 2006a, @doi [ ] 10.1086/497829 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131..343D 131, 343

    doi

  100. [108]

    de Blok W. J. G., Walter F., 2006b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/497828 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131..363D 131, 363

    doi

  101. [109]

    de Blok W. J. G., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348297 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...688A.109D 688, A109

    2024 doi

  102. [110]

    de Vaucouleurs G., 1959, @doi [Handbuch der Physik] 10.1007/978-3-642-45932-0_7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1959HDP....53..275D 53, 275

    1959 doi

  103. [111]

    de Vaucouleurs G., de Vaucouleurs A., Corwin Jr. H. G., Buta R. J., Paturel G., Fouque P., 1991, Third Reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies

    1991

  104. [112]

    S., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab859 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.504.3221D 504, 3221

    den Brok J. S., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab859 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.504.3221D 504, 3221

    2021 doi

  105. [113]

    D., Puche D., Wong T., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/300584 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998AJ....116.2341V 116, 2341

    van Dyk S. D., Puche D., Wong T., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/300584 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998AJ....116.2341V 116, 2341

    1998 doi

  106. [114]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.