Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 70 references

Sums of Mixed Independent Positive Random Variables: A Unified Framework

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Sums of independent positive random variables sharing a fractional-power Laplace form have exact PDFs and CDFs in one compact series — even when the marginal series diverge — giving first exact statistics for many fading models and mixed…

desk verdict A useful unification idea undercut by an unproven and likely false treatment of divergent Laplace series in the θ≥1 regime that carries the paper's main applications. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.02186 v1 pith:SXY4CUZM submitted 2025-06-02 eess.SP

Fernando Darío Almeida García , Michel Daoud Yacoub , José Cândido Silveira Santos Filho This is my paper
classification eess.SP
keywords mixedsumsofrandomvariablesfadingdistributionsGaussian-classnon-Gaussian-classalpha-mumixturedistributionsinglecompositeexactsumstatistics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims a theorem that turns sums of independent positive random variables into a single compact infinite series. If each summand's Laplace transform (the standard integral transform of its probability density) has the form $\Psi_\ell \sum_{i=0}^\infty \eta_{i,\ell} s^{-\beta_\ell - i\theta}$, then the PDF and CDF of the total are given by the two series (3) and (4), whose coefficients follow from a short recurrence instead of a multi-dimensional convolution. The paper further introduces the $\alpha$-$\mu$ mixture distribution and shows that every Gaussian-class fading model — Rayleigh, Nakagami-$m$, Rice, Weibull, $\bar\alpha$-$\bar\mu$, $\kappa$-$\bar\mu$, fluctuating two-ray and its multi-cluster and shadowed variants — is an instance of it, so the same theorem delivers exact sum statistics for a whole catalogue of fading models at once, including mixed sums that previously had no tractable exact treatment. If the claim is right, engineers can evaluate diversity-combining and detection performance for sums of a dozen fading variates by summing a single tractable series, instead of multivariate Fox $H$-functions or multifold integrals.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the Laplace transform expressed as a series in fractional powers of $s$: $\mathcal{L}\{f_{X_\ell}\}(s) = \Psi_\ell s^{-\beta_\ell}\sum_{i\ge 0}\eta_{i,\ell} s^{-i\theta}$. The mechanism is formal log–exponential composition in the variable $s^{-\theta}$: the Laplace transform of the sum is the product of the $L$ marginal transforms, and the proof takes logarithms to turn that product into a sum, expands each $\log \nu_\ell$ as a fresh series whose coefficients follow from the $\eta_{i,\ell}$ through the identity $(\log \nu)' = \nu'/\nu$ (derivative with respect to $s^{-\theta}$), and then exponentiates back, so the coefficients $\delta_i$ of the final single series obey the first-order recurrence above. What makes the theorem usable is its tolerance for divergence: the input series may diverge for $\theta \ge 1$ as long as its coefficients grow no faster than a gamma function, which is exactly the regime of the marginal Laplace series of $\alpha$-$\mu$ fading variates with $\alpha \ge 1$ — the regime the paper's headline applications rely on. The truncation-error bounds (13)–(14), derived from the same gamma-function growth control, state how many series terms suffice for a chosen accuracy.

What would settle it

Evaluate the truncated series (3) with the recurrence (5)–(6) for the i.i.d. sum of two Rayleigh envelope variates (the $\alpha = 2$, $\theta = 2 \ge 1$ divergent regime) and compare it pointwise across a wide range of $x$ with the exact two-Rayleigh sum PDF obtained by high-precision numerical inversion of the product of the two marginal Laplace transforms, whose error can be controlled independently. If, as the number of terms grows, the series does not converge to the known exact values, or if any computed case violates the truncation bound (13), then the term-by-term inversion of a divergent series that supports all the paper's $\alpha \ge 1$ applications is invalidated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is the Theorem of Section II-A. Let $\{X_\ell\}_{\ell=1}^L$ be independent positive random variables whose Laplace transforms have the fractional-power form $\mathcal{L}\{f_{X_\ell}\}(s) = \Psi_\ell \sum_{i=0}^\infty \eta_{i,\ell} s^{-\beta_\ell - i\theta}$, with the series absolutely convergent for $\theta \in (0,1)$, or divergent for $\theta \ge 1$ provided $|\eta_{i,\ell}|/\Gamma(i\theta + \varepsilon) \to 0$. Then the PDF and CDF of the sum $X = \sum_{\ell=1}^L X_\ell$ are given exactly by the single series $f_X(x) = (\prod_\ell \Psi_\ell)\sum_{i=0}^\infty \delta_i x^{\theta i + \sum_\ell \beta_\ell - 1}/\Gamma(\theta i + \sum_\ell \beta_\ell)$ and its integral, with coefficients $\delta_0 = \prod_\ell \eta_{0,\ell}$ and $\delta_i = \frac{1}{i}\sum_{h=1}^i \delta_{i-h}\sum_{\ell=1}^L \varphi_{h-1,\ell}$ generated from auxiliary coefficients $\varphi_{h,\ell}$ defined by the ratio recurrences in (6a)–(6b). The paper then shows that every Gaussian-class fading distribution is a mixture of $\alpha$-$\mu$ distributions (Proposition 1), so the theorem yields, for the first reported time, exact sum PDFs and CDFs for i.i.d., i.n.i.d., and mixed sums of all these models, and likewise for sums of ratios of $\bar\alpha$-$\bar\mu$ variates in the non-Gaussian class. The formulas are validated by Monte Carlo simulation and by comparison with the multifold convolution integral of [45] for sums of up to twelve variates.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a divergent Laplace series can be handled like a convergent one — logged, exponentiated, and inverted term by term — provided its coefficients grow no faster than a gamma function, and all of the paper's main fading applications sit in that divergent regime ($\theta = \alpha \ge 1$).

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The theorem provides the first reported exact PDFs and CDFs for sums of $\alpha$-$\eta$-$\kappa$-$\mu$, $\alpha$-$\kappa$-$\mu$ shadowed, extended $\alpha$-$\eta$-$\mu$, fluctuating Beckmann, FTR, IFTR, MFTR, and MTW fading variates, in both i.i.d. and i.n.i.d. settings.
  • Mixed sums — arbitrary combinations of Gaussian-class and non-Gaussian-class fading variates — are evaluated with the same two formulas (3) and (4), a capability previously available only through multifold convolution integration.
  • Because every Gaussian-class model is an $\alpha$-$\mu$ mixture, one software implementation of the sum formulas covers the entire class, and the truncation bounds (13)–(14) tell the user how many terms to keep for a target accuracy.
  • The framework replaces multivariate Fox $H$-functions, Lauricella hypergeometric series, and multi-fold integrals with one infinite series whose coefficients come from a first-order recurrence, so computational cost no longer escalates sharply with the number of summands.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The recurrences (5)–(6) are the general formal-power-series operation 'exponential of a logarithm' applied in the variable $s^{-\theta}$; the same mechanism would produce sum statistics for any distribution family whose Laplace transform admits such an expansion — for instance, positive stable-like or Mittag-Leffler-type variates — provided the coefficient growth condition holds.
  • The paper's own proof applies log, exp, and term-by-term inversion to a series that may diverge for $\theta \ge 1$; a reader who wants the $\alpha \ge 1$ results to be exact rather than formal should run the two-Rayleigh cross-check described in the falsifier below.
  • The $\alpha$-$\mu$ mixture representation suggests a model-agnostic estimation strategy: fit fading data directly to a few mixture weights on the common $\alpha$-$\mu$ basis instead of selecting among named fading models — a procedure the paper does not develop.
  • The truncation bound (13) carries a factor $e^{x^\theta}$, so the CDF series may need many terms for large arguments; a complementary large-$x$ tail asymptotic would be a natural addition.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a Laplace-domain framework for deriving the PDF and CDF of sums of independent positive random variables. The central Theorem (Section II-A) states that if each marginal Laplace transform has the form L{f_X_ell}(s) = Psi_ell sum_i eta_{i,ell} s^{-beta_ell - i theta}, with the stated convergence/divergence conditions, then the sum's PDF and CDF are given by the compact series (3) and (4). The paper also introduces an alpha-mu mixture distribution to unify Gaussian-class fading models and derives sum statistics for several fading distributions, including mixed sums. The main claims are validated by simulations in Section VI. The core mathematical issue is the treatment of the divergent series regime theta >= 1, which is exactly the regime required for the fading applications.

Significance. If the central theorem were valid, the framework would provide new exact sum statistics for a broad range of fading models, including many for which only numerical or approximate results are currently available. The paper covers a large number of recent and generalized fading models and includes Monte Carlo validation, which is a strength. However, the theorem's theta >= 1 regime is load-bearing for all the principal applications, since the fading models use theta = alpha >= 1. A concrete counterexample shows the theorem is false as stated in that regime, so the claimed contributions are currently unsupported. The potential significance for wireless communications is high, but the mathematical foundation must be repaired before the results can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section II-A, Theorem; Appendix A, Eqs. (47)-(60)] The proof of the Theorem for theta >= 1 treats the divergent series in (1) as a convergent series, performing formal logarithms, exponentials, differentiation with respect to s^{-theta}, and term-by-term Bromwich inversion without any analytic continuation or summability justification. This is not a minor gap: for the single random variable with density f(x)=e^{-x}/(1+x), L=1, beta=1, theta=1, the Laplace transform has the asymptotic expansion with eta_i = (-1)^i sum_{n=0}^i n! binom(i,n), and lim |eta_i|/Gamma(i+2)=0, so the theorem's hypothesis is satisfied. Yet formula (3) reduces to the Taylor series of f at 0, namely sum (-1)^i (sum_{k=0}^i 1/k!) x^i, which diverges for x>1 while f(x) is positive and finite for all x>0. The theorem is therefore false as stated for theta >= 1, not merely unproven.
  2. [Appendix B, Eqs. (74)-(88)] The convergence proof for theta >= 1 relies on the claimed 'super-multiplicative property' Gamma(a)Gamma(b) <= Gamma(a+b) at Eqs. (79) and (84). This property is false; for example, Gamma(1/2)^2 = pi > 1 = Gamma(1). The inductive bounds for |phi_{h,ell}| and |delta_i| therefore do not follow, and the proof of absolute convergence of (3)-(4) collapses. Even if a correct bound were found, it would only establish convergence of the displayed series, not their equality to the true PDF and CDF, so the gap in the theorem's proof remains.
  3. [Appendices E and F, Props. 2 and 3; Eqs. (27)-(28), (39)-(40)] The main applications set theta = alpha >= 1, which is precisely the regime in which the Theorem is unproven and contradicted by the counterexample above. In Appendix E, after deriving the Laplace transform for alpha < 1, the paper argues that for alpha >= 1 the coefficients lambda_{i,ell} satisfy the growth condition and then states 'we can now directly apply the Theorem.' This is circular because the Theorem's validity in that regime is exactly what is in question. The same applies to the coefficients u_{i,ell} in Appendix F. The central claims of Sections III-VI therefore rest on an unsupported theorem.
  4. [Appendix D, Eqs. (90)-(92) and bound (13)] The truncation error bound (13) depends on the unproven bound (74) and additionally assumes, in the sentence before Eq. (92), that the unknown constant K 'increases linearly with i.' This assumption is unjustified and is not derived from the preceding analysis. Consequently, the practical error bound used to justify truncation of the series is not established.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Title] The title contains a typo: 'V ariables' should read 'Variables'.
  2. [Appendix C] The word 'repectively' should be 'respectively'.
  3. [Section VI] The opening sentence reads 'In section, we briefly validate...' and should be 'In this section, we briefly validate...'.
  4. [Eq. (14)] In the homogeneous truncation error expression, the subscript in 'Lbeta_ell' is not defined in the homogeneous case and should simply be 'L beta'.
  5. [Appendix E, Eq. (102)] In the first residue branch of Eq. (102), the symbol 'T' appears without a subscript; it should be 'T_ell' to match the notation used elsewhere in the paper.
  6. [Table I] The table is introduced as an illustration of the PDF parameter mapping for the alpha-mu mixture, but it lists only two models (MFTR and alpha-eta-kappa-mu). Please indicate explicitly that only two representative models are shown, or include the remaining Gaussian-class models.
  7. [References] Reference [66] is a Wolfram Research website entry rather than a standard peer-reviewed reference; please provide the specific function page identifier and the full access date in the reference itself.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

No fitted-input or prediction-by-construction circularity; one genuinely circular step appears in Appendix B's absolute-convergence proof, which uses the target bound (74) to prove itself.

  1. other [Appendix B, 'Absolute Convergence: θ∈[1,∞)', around Eqs. (74)-(79)]
    "Note that for Sδ to converge absolutely, an appropriate and straightforward bound for δi is given by |δi| ≤ K Γ(iθ+ε)/i!, i ≥ 1 ... Replacing (74) into (78) and using the super-multiplicative property of the gamma function [65], the right-hand side of (78) can be bounded as ... ≤ Γ(iθ+ε)/i."

    The purpose of this part of Appendix B is to prove the bound (74), which is then used to establish absolute convergence of (3)-(4) for θ≥1. But after deriving inequality (78) for |δ_i|, the proof substitutes (74) itself into (78) to majorize the right-hand side. That is exactly the proposition being proved, so the bound is assumed rather than derived. The later steps that fix C and conclude (88) still rely on (79), which is only valid if (74) is already available. Thus the claimed absolute-convergence proof for the θ≥1 regime, the regime used by the α≥1 Gaussian-class applications, is circular as written. Separately, the cited Γ(a)Γ(b)≤Γ(a+b) inequality is false; that is a correctness defect rather than an input-output circularity.

full rationale

The central theorem is not circular in the input-output sense: (3)-(4) are obtained by multiplying the marginal Laplace expansions (1), forming logarithms of each factor, exponentiating the sum, and inverting term-by-term; the δ_i recurrence (5)-(6) is exactly the coefficient algebra of the product formal power series. Nothing is fitted to data, and no output quantity is used to define an input parameter. The applications in Propositions 2 and 3 are genuine substitutions of the Laplace coefficients λ_i and u_i into the theorem; they do not presuppose the sum statistics. The α-μ mixture representation of Proposition 1 builds on the authors' own [6], but [6] is a published, parameter-free derivation with stated assumptions and is not a fitted input, so this self-citation is not load-bearing circularity. What is circular is the absolute-convergence proof for θ∈[1,∞) in Appendix B: the target bound (74) is inserted into the very inequality (78) that is supposed to establish it. That proof gap matters because the α≥1 regime carries the Gaussian-class applications. Separately, Appendix B's appeal to Γ(a)Γ(b)≤Γ(a+b) is false, which is a correctness defect rather than a circularity reduction. Overall, the derivation chain is largely self-contained and is not a case of prediction-by-construction; the score reflects the one self-referential step in the convergence proof, not a fitted-input circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper does not fit any numerical parameters to data; all distribution parameters come from the fading models. The main assumptions are about the Laplace representation and the validity of formal series manipulation for divergent series. The alpha-mu mixture is not an independent physical entity but a repackaging of prior work.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Each X_l has a Laplace transform expressible as a series in s^{-theta} of the form (1), with the stated convergence and divergence behavior.
    This defines the entire class of distributions the framework covers. It excludes positive random variables whose Laplace transforms do not admit such an expansion.
  • ad hoc to paper For theta >= 1, the formal power series in (1) may be manipulated as if it were convergent, and its term-by-term inverse Laplace transform yields the true density.
    Used throughout Appendix A and in Propositions 2 and 3 for alpha >= 1. No analytic-continuation or summability argument is given.
  • standard math The interchange of infinite summation and Bromwich contour integration is valid for the final series (3).
    Invoked in Appendix A. Requires stronger decay than absolute convergence of the coefficient series, which is not demonstrated.
  • standard math The gamma function is super-multiplicative in the sense used in Appendix B.
    Invoked near (79). This property is not true in general, so the bound derived from it is not justified.
  • domain assumption All Gaussian-class fading models are representable as alpha-mu mixtures via the formulas of Proposition 1, taken from prior work [6].
    The paper relies on [6] for this representation. It is a published derivation but is not reproduced or independently verified here.
invented entities (1)
  • alpha-mu mixture distribution
    purpose: Unified representation of all Gaussian-class fading models, enabling the sum framework to apply to them.
    This is a mathematical reparameterization of the gamma mixture in [6] via R = W^{1/alpha}. No new falsifiable prediction is made beyond the parent model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sums of Mixed Independent Positive Random Variables: A Unified Framework." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SXY4CUZM

@misc{pith2026250602186,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sums of Mixed Independent Positive Random Variables: A Unified Framework},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SXY4CUZM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.02186}
}
abstract

This paper proposes a comprehensive and unprecedented framework that streamlines the derivation of exact, compact -- yet tractable -- solutions for the probability density function (PDF) and cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the sum of a broad spectrum of mixed independent positive random variables (RVs). To showcase the framework's potential and extensive applicability, we tackle the enduring challenge of obtaining these statistics for the sum of fading variates in an exact, manageable, and unified manner. Specifically, we derive novel, tractable expressions for the PDF and CDF of the sum of Gaussian-class and non-Gaussian-class fading distributions, thereby covering a plethora of conventional, generalized, and recently introduced fading models. The proposed framework accommodates independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) sums, independent but not necessarily identically distributed (i.n.i.d.) sums, and mixed-type sums. Moreover, we introduce the strikingly novel $\alpha$-$\mu$ mixture distribution that unifies all Gaussian-class fading models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.02186 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. CDF of the sum of fading distributions. distributions [24]. If {Zℓ} L ℓ=1 is a set of i.i.d. ratios of α¯- µ¯ distributions (i.e., µM,ℓ = µM , µQ,ℓ = µQ, ΩM,ℓ = ΩM, ΩQ,ℓ = ΩQ), then the PDF and the CDF of Z, as indicated in (39) and (40), simplify respectively to [61, eqs. (5) and (7)]. V. SCENARIO 3: MIXED SUMS In this section, by leveraging the Theorem, we obtain the mixed-sum statistics of Gaussian-class and non-… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [6]

    A broad Gaussian class of power sums are gamma mixtures,

    F. D. A. Garc´ ıa, F. R. A. Parente, F. d. P . Calmon, and J. C. S. Santos Filho, “A broad Gaussian class of power sums are gamma mixtures,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 479–493, Jan. 2025

    work page 2025

  2. [1]

    M. K. Simon and M.-S. Alouini, Digital Communication over Fading Channels, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2004

    work page 2004

  3. [2]

    Equal- gain diversity receiver performance in wireless channels,

    A. Annamalai, C. Tellambura, and V . K. Bhargava, “Equal- gain diversity receiver performance in wireless channels,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 1732–1745, Oct. 2000

    work page 2000

  4. [3]

    Simple and accurate polynomial formulas fo r error rates of high-order EGC in iid Rayleigh fading,

    Q. T. Zhang, “Simple and accurate polynomial formulas fo r error rates of high-order EGC in iid Rayleigh fading,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 1334–1338, Jul. 2022

    work page 2022

  5. [4]

    Performance analysis of c oherent equal gain combining over Nakagami- m fading channels,

    M.-S. Alouini and M. K. Simon, “Performance analysis of c oherent equal gain combining over Nakagami- m fading channels,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1449–1463, Nov. 2001

    work page 2001

  6. [5]

    CA-CFAR performance in K-distributed sea clut ter with fully correlated texture,

    D. S. Medeiros, F. D. A. Garc´ ıa, R. Machado, J. C. S. S. Fil ho, and O. Saotome, “CA-CFAR performance in K-distributed sea clut ter with fully correlated texture,” IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. , vol. 20, pp. 1–5, 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    The α-µ distribution: A physical fading model for the Stacy distribution,

    M. D. Y acoub, “The α-µ distribution: A physical fading model for the Stacy distribution,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 27–34, Jan. 2007

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    The κ-µ distribution and the η-µ distribution,

    ——, “The κ-µ distribution and the η-µ distribution,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 68–81, Feb. 2007

    work page 2007

Show all 70 references
  1. [9]

    The α-η-µ and α-κ-µ fading distributions,

    G. Fraidenraich and M. D. Y acoub, “The α-η-µ and α-κ-µ fading distributions,” in Proc. IEEE Ninth International Symposium on Spread Spectrum Techniques and Applications , Aug. 2006, pp. 16–20

    2006

  2. [10]

    Extended η-µ fading models,

    G. R. de Lima Tejerina, C. R. N. da Silva, and M. D. Y acoub, “Extended η-µ fading models,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 8153–8164, Dec. 2020

    2020

  3. [11]

    Extende d α-η- µ fading distribution: Statistical properties and applicat ions,

    H. Al-Hmood, R. S. Abbas, and H. Al-Raweshidy, “Extende d α-η- µ fading distribution: Statistical properties and applicat ions,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 109 803–109 813, Oct. 2022

    2022

  4. [12]

    T he α- η-κ-µ fading model: New fundamental results,

    C. R. N. da Silva, G. R. d. L. Tejerina, and M. D. Y acoub, “T he α- η-κ-µ fading model: New fundamental results,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 443–454, Jan. 2020

    2020

  5. [13]

    A general statistical channel model for mobile satellite systems,

    Y . Xie and Y . Fang, “A general statistical channel model for mobile satellite systems,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 744– 752, May 2000

    2000

  6. [14]

    Capacity analysis of two-wave with dif fuse power fad- ing channels using a mixture of gamma distributions,

    N. Y . Ermolova, “Capacity analysis of two-wave with dif fuse power fad- ing channels using a mixture of gamma distributions,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 2245–2248, Nov. 2016

    2016

  7. [15]

    Sum of squared shadowed-Rice r andom variables and its application to communication systems per formance prediction,

    G. Alfano and A. De Maio, “Sum of squared shadowed-Rice r andom variables and its application to communication systems per formance prediction,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 3540– 3545, Oct. 2007

    2007

  8. [16]

    Statistical characterization of κ-µ shadowed fading,

    J. F. Paris, “Statistical characterization of κ-µ shadowed fading,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 518–526, Feb. 2014

    2014

  9. [17]

    The α-κ-µ shadowed fading distribution: Statistical characterization and applications,

    P . Ramirez-Espinosa, J. M. Moualeu, D. B. da Costa, and F . J. Lopez-Martinez, “The α-κ-µ shadowed fading distribution: Statistical characterization and applications,” in Proc. IEEE Global Commun. Conf. (GLOBECOM) , Waikoloa, HI, USA, Dec. 2019, pp. 1–6

    2019

  10. [18]

    An extension of the κ-µ shadowed fading model: Statistical characterization and applications,

    P . Ramirez-Espinosa, F. J. Lopez-Martinez, J. F. Paris , M. D. Y acoub, and E. Martos-Naya, “An extension of the κ-µ shadowed fading model: Statistical characterization and applications,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 3826–3837, May 2018

    2018

  11. [19]

    The fluctuating two-ray fading model: Statisti cal charac- terization and performance analysis,

    J. M. Romero-Jerez, F. J. Lopez-Martinez, J. F. Paris, a nd A. J. Goldsmith, “The fluctuating two-ray fading model: Statisti cal charac- terization and performance analysis,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 4420–4432, Jul. 2017

    2017

  12. [20]

    The fluctuating two-ray fading model with in dependent specular components,

    M. Olyaee, J. A. Cort´ es, F. J. Lopez-Martinez, J. F. Par is, and J. M. Romero-Jerez, “The fluctuating two-ray fading model with in dependent specular components,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol. , vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 5533–5545, May 2023

    2023

  13. [21]

    The multi-cluster fluctuating two-ray fading model ,

    J. D. V . S´ anchez, F. J. L ´ opez-Mart´ ınez, J. F. Paris, and J. M. Romero- Jerez, “The multi-cluster fluctuating two-ray fading model ,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 10 048–10 052, Dec. 2022

    2022

  14. [22]

    The multi-cluster two-wave fading model,

    M. Olyaee, J. P . Pe˜ na-Mart´ ın, F. Javier Lopez-Martin ez, and J. M. Romero-Jerez, “The multi-cluster two-wave fading model,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 2707–2718, Apr. 2025

    2025

  15. [23]

    The Fisher–Snedecor F distribution: A simple and accurate composite fading model,

    S. K. Y oo, S. L. Cotton, P . C. Sofotasios, M. Matthaiou, M . V alkama, and G. K. Karagiannidis, “The Fisher–Snedecor F distribution: A simple and accurate composite fading model,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 1661–1664, Jul. 2017

    2017

  16. [24]

    The α-F composite fading distribution: Statistical characterization and applications,

    O. S. Badarneh, “The α-F composite fading distribution: Statistical characterization and applications,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 8097–8106, Aug. 2020

    2020

  17. [25]

    Simple closed-form approximation to Ricean sum distributions,

    J. A. L ´ opez-Salcedo, “Simple closed-form approximation to Ricean sum distributions,” IEEE Signal Process. Lett. , vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 153–155, Mar. 2009

    2009

  18. [26]

    Simple precise ap proximations to Weibull sums,

    J. C. S. Santos Filho and M. D. Y acoub, “Simple precise ap proximations to Weibull sums,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 614–616, Aug. 2006

    2006

  19. [27]

    Hi ghly accurate closed-form approximations to the sum of α-µ variates and applications,

    D. B. da Costa, M. D. Y acoub, and J. C. S. Santos Filho, “Hi ghly accurate closed-form approximations to the sum of α-µ variates and applications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 3301– 3306, Sep. 2008

    2008

  20. [28]

    Accurate variable-order ap proximations to the sum of α-µ variates with application to MIMO systems,

    M. Payami and A. Falahati, “Accurate variable-order ap proximations to the sum of α-µ variates with application to MIMO systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1612–1623, Mar. 2021. 13

    2021

  21. [29]

    As ymptotically exact approximations to generalized fading sum statistics ,

    V . Perim, J. D. V . S´ anchez, and J. C. S. Santos Filho, “As ymptotically exact approximations to generalized fading sum statistics ,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 205–217, Jan. 2020

    2020

  22. [30]

    Analysis of equal gain combining over fluctuating two-ray channels wi th applica- tions to millimeter-wave communications,

    H. Hashemi, J. Haghighat, M. Eslami, and W. A. Hamouda, “ Analysis of equal gain combining over fluctuating two-ray channels wi th applica- tions to millimeter-wave communications,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 1751–1765, Feb. 2020

    2020

  23. [31]

    Sum of rati os of products for α-µ random variables in wireless multihop relaying and multiple scattering,

    K. Wang, T. Wang, Y . Chen, and M.-S. Alouini, “Sum of rati os of products for α-µ random variables in wireless multihop relaying and multiple scattering,” in Proc. IEEE 80th V eh. Technol. Conf. (VTC2014- Fall), V ancouver, BC, Canada, Sep. 2014, pp. 1–5

    2014

  24. [32]

    On the sum of α-µ/Inverse Gamma variates with applications to diversity receivers,

    W. Cheng, T. Ma, and G. Wang, “On the sum of α-µ/Inverse Gamma variates with applications to diversity receivers,” Appl. Sciences, vol. 12, no. 11, May 2022

    2022

  25. [33]

    The distribution of the sum of inde pendent Gamma random variables,

    P . G. Moschopoulos, “The distribution of the sum of inde pendent Gamma random variables,” Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. (Part A) , vol. 37, p. 541–544, 1985

    1985

  26. [34]

    Sum of gamma varia tes and performance of wireless communication systems over Nakaga mi-fading channels,

    M.-S. Alouini, A. Abdi, and M. Kaveh, “Sum of gamma varia tes and performance of wireless communication systems over Nakaga mi-fading channels,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol. , vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1471–1480, Nov. 2001

    2001

  27. [35]

    Performance of MR C diversity systems for the detection of signals with Nakagami fading,

    E. Al-Hussaini and A. Al-Bassiouni, “Performance of MR C diversity systems for the detection of signals with Nakagami fading,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1315–1319, Dec. 1985

    1985

  28. [36]

    Performance of RAKE rece ivers in Nakagami fading channel with arbitrary fading parameters,

    G. Efthymoglou and V . A. Aalo, “Performance of RAKE rece ivers in Nakagami fading channel with arbitrary fading parameters, ” Electron. Lett., vol. 31, pp. 1610–1612, Aug. 1995

    1995

  29. [37]

    C losed-form statistics for the sum of squared Nakagami- m variates and its appli- cations,

    G. K. Karagiannidis, N. C. Sagias, and T. A. Tsiftsis, “C losed-form statistics for the sum of squared Nakagami- m variates and its appli- cations,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 1353–1359, Aug. 2006

    2006

  30. [38]

    Ne w results on the sum of gamma random variates with application to the perf ormance of wireless communication systems over Nakagami- m fading channels,

    I. S. Ansari, F. Yilmaz, M.-S. Alouini, and O. Kucur, “Ne w results on the sum of gamma random variates with application to the perf ormance of wireless communication systems over Nakagami- m fading channels,” Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. , vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–14, Dec. 2017

    2017

  31. [39]

    On the sum of correlated squared κ-µ shadowed random variables and its application to performance analys is of MRC,

    M. R. Bhatnagar, “On the sum of correlated squared κ-µ shadowed random variables and its application to performance analys is of MRC,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 2678–2684, Jun. 2015

    2015

  32. [40]

    Sum of non-identical independent squared η-µ variates and applica- tions in the performance analysis of DS-CDMA systems,

    K. P . Peppas, F. Lazarakis, T. Zervos, A. Alexandridis, and K. Dangakis, “Sum of non-identical independent squared η-µ variates and applica- tions in the performance analysis of DS-CDMA systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 2718–2723, Sep. 2010

    2010

  33. [41]

    On the sum of squared η-µ random variates with application to the performance of wire less communication systems,

    I. S. Ansari, F. Yilmaz, and M.-S. Alouini, “On the sum of squared η-µ random variates with application to the performance of wire less communication systems,” in Proc. IEEE 77th V ehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring) , Dresden, Germany, Jun. 2013, pp. 1–6

    2013

  34. [42]

    Sum of squ ared fluctuating two-ray random variables with wireless applica tions,

    J. Zheng, J. Zhang, G. Pan, J. Cheng, and B. Ai, “Sum of squ ared fluctuating two-ray random variables with wireless applica tions,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 8173–8177, Aug. 2019

    2019

  35. [43]

    New findings on the sum of squared fluctuating two -ray random variables and applications,

    F. D. A. Garc´ ıa, F. R. A. Parente, N. O. Garz´ on, H. R. C. Mora, and J. C. S. S. Filho, “New findings on the sum of squared fluctuating two -ray random variables and applications,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 7357–7362, May 2024

    2024

  36. [44]

    Performance evaluation of MRC systems over sub-te rahertz MFTR fading channels,

    N. O. Garz´ on, H. C. Mora, F. A. Garc´ ıa, J. V ega-S´ anchez, and D. M. Osorio, “Performance evaluation of MRC systems over sub-te rahertz MFTR fading channels,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 2422–2426, Sep. 2024

    2024

  37. [45]

    Linear diversity combining techniques ,

    D. G. Brennan, “Linear diversity combining techniques ,” Proc. IRE , vol. 47, pp. 1075–1102, Jun. 1959

    1959

  38. [46]

    Analytical lev el crossing rates and average fade durations for diversity techniques in Naka gami fading channels,

    C. -D. Iskander and P . T. Mathiopoulos, “Analytical lev el crossing rates and average fade durations for diversity techniques in Naka gami fading channels,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 1301–1309, Aug. 2002

    2002

  39. [47]

    Impr oved exact evaluation of equal-gain diversity receivers in Rayleigh f ading chan- nels,

    F. A. Garc´ ıa, H. Carvajal Mora, and N. O. Garz´ on, “Impr oved exact evaluation of equal-gain diversity receivers in Rayleigh f ading chan- nels,” IEEE Access , vol. 10, pp. 26 974–26 984, Mar. 2022

    2022

  40. [48]

    Uma soluc ¸ ˜ ao exata mais eficiente para a soma de vari´ aveis aleat´ orias Nakagami-m e aplicac ¸ ˜ oes (in portuguese),

    F. D. A. Garc´ ıa, F. R. A. Parente, N. O. Garz´ on, H. R. C. M ora, and J. C. S. Santos Filho, “Uma soluc ¸ ˜ ao exata mais eficiente para a soma de vari´ aveis aleat´ orias Nakagami-m e aplicac ¸ ˜ oes (in portuguese),” inProc. XXXIX Brazilian Symposium of Telecommunications ...

    2021

  41. [49]

    Second- order statistics for diversity-combining techniques in Na kagami-fading channels,

    M. D. Y acoub, C. R. C. M. da Silva, and J. E. V argas Bautist a, “Second- order statistics for diversity-combining techniques in Na kagami-fading channels,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol. , vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1464–1470, Nov. 2001

    2001

  42. [50]

    On the dist ribution of the sum of Nakagami- m random variables,

    P . Dharmawansa, N. Rajatheva, and K. Ahmed, “On the dist ribution of the sum of Nakagami- m random variables,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 1407–1416, Jul. 2007

    2007

  43. [51]

    New exact closed-form PDF of the sum of Nakagami- m random variables with applications,

    M. A. Rahman and H. Harada, “New exact closed-form PDF of the sum of Nakagami- m random variables with applications,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 395–401, Feb. 2011

    2011

  44. [52]

    Novel expressions for Ricean sum distributions and densities,

    F. D. A. Garc´ ıa, H. R. C. Mora, and N. V . O. Garz´ on, “Novel expressions for Ricean sum distributions and densities,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 3513–3517, Nov. 2021

    2021

  45. [53]

    Sum of Weibull variates an d performance of diversity systems,

    F. Yilmaz and M.-S. Alouini, “Sum of Weibull variates an d performance of diversity systems,” in Proc. International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC’09) , Leipzig, Germany, Jun. 2009, p. 247–252

    2009

  46. [54]

    Light exact expressions for the sum of Weibul l random variables,

    F. D. A. Garc´ ıa, F. R. A. Parente, G. Fraidenraich, and J . C. S. Santos Filho, “Light exact expressions for the sum of Weibul l random variables,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 2445– 2449, Nov. 2021

    2021

  47. [55]

    On the sum o f independent Fox’s H -function variates with applications,

    Y . Abo Rahama, M. H. Ismail, and M. S. Hassan, “On the sum o f independent Fox’s H -function variates with applications,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 6752–6760, Aug. 2018

    2018

  48. [56]

    On the exact sum PDF and CDF of α-µ variates,

    F. D. A. Garc´ ıa, F. R. A. Parente, M. D. Y acoub, and J. C. S . Santos Filho, “On the exact sum PDF and CDF of α-µ variates,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 5084–5095, Aug. 2023

    2023

  49. [57]

    Exact κ-µ sum statistics,

    ——, “Exact κ-µ sum statistics,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1284–1288, Jul. 2023

    2023

  50. [58]

    Sum of Fisher-Snede cor F random variables and its applications,

    H. Du, J. Zhang, J. Cheng, and B. Ai, “Sum of Fisher-Snede cor F random variables and its applications,” IEEE Open J. Commun. , vol. 1, pp. 342–356, Mar. 2020

    2020

  51. [59]

    On the sum of Fisher–Snedecor F variates and its application to maximal-ratio combining,

    O. S. Badarneh, D. B. da Costa, P . C. Sofotasios, S. Muhai dat, and S. L. Cotton, “On the sum of Fisher–Snedecor F variates and its application to maximal-ratio combining,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 966–969, Dec. 2018

    2018

  52. [60]

    O n the sum of α-F and double α-F variateswith application to MRC and RIS,

    H. S. Silva, G. B. L. C. Lourenc ¸o, W. J. L. Queiroz, A. S. R . Oliveira, F. Madeiro, O. S. Badarneh, U. S. Dias, and R. A. A. de Souza, “O n the sum of α-F and double α-F variateswith application to MRC and RIS,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 2894–2898, Dec. 2022

    2022

  53. [61]

    On the sum o f ratios of α-µ variates with application to composite fading channels,

    L. P . J. Jim´ enez, F. D. A. Garc´ ıa, M. C. L. Alvarado, J. C . S. Santos Filho, M. D. Y acoub, and G. Fraidenraich, “On the sum o f ratios of α-µ variates with application to composite fading channels,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 6638–6643, Apr. 2025

    2025

  54. [62]

    Ratio of two envelopes taken from α-µ, η-µ, and κ-µ variates and some practical applications,

    C. R. N. Da Silva, N. Simmons, E. J. Leonardo, S. L. Cotton , and M. D. Y acoub, “Ratio of two envelopes taken from α-µ, η-µ, and κ-µ variates and some practical applications,” IEEE Access , vol. 7, pp. 54 449–54 463, May 2019

    2019

  55. [63]

    A. M. Mathai, R. K. Saxena, and H. J. Haubold, The H-function: Theory and Applications . New Y ork: Springer, 2009

    2009

  56. [64]

    H. M. Srivastava and P . W. Karlsson, Multiple Gaussian Hypergeometric Series. New Y ork: Ellis Horwood Limited, 1985

    1985

  57. [65]

    F. W. J. Olver, D. W. Lozier, R. F. Boisvert, and C. W. Clar k, NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions , 1st ed. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Commerce: National Institute of Standards and Tech nology (NIST), 2010

    2010

  58. [66]

    12, 2023

    Wolfram Research, Inc., W olfram Research, Accessed: Dec. 12, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://functions.wolfram.com

    2023

  59. [67]

    An improved closed-form approximation to the sum of arbitrary Nakagami- m variates,

    D. B. da Costa, M. D. Y acoub, and J. C. S. Santos Filho, “An improved closed-form approximation to the sum of arbitrary Nakagami- m variates,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 3854–3858, Nov. 2008

    2008

  60. [68]

    Asymptotical ly exact frame- work to approximate sums of positive correlated random vari ables and application to diversity-combining receivers,

    F. R. A. Parente and J. C. S. Santos Filho, “Asymptotical ly exact frame- work to approximate sums of positive correlated random vari ables and application to diversity-combining receivers,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1012–1015, Aug. 2019

    2019

  61. [69]

    Kreyszig, Advanced Engineering Mathematics, 10th ed

    E. Kreyszig, Advanced Engineering Mathematics, 10th ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2010

    2010

  62. [70]

    Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis , 1st ed

    W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis , 1st ed. McGraw-Hill, 1976

    1976

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.