Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 39 references

High Light-Efficiency Holographic Tomographic Volumetric Additive Manufacturing using a MEMS-based Phase-only Light Modulator

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A MEMS phase-only light modulator makes holographic tomographic 3D printing roughly 70 times more light-efficient than amplitude-based systems, enabling low-power laser diodes to print centimeter-scale objects in tens of seconds.

desk verdict A credible first demonstration of PLM-based volumetric printing with a real efficiency gain, but the scale and fidelity claims outrun what is actually shown; the load-bearing unknown is whether the Bessel-beam pipeline preserves the tomographic dose at small features. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.02578 v1 pith:L7HLZIML submitted 2025-06-03 physics.optics

Maria Isabel Álvarez-Castaño , Ye Pu , Christophe Moser This is my paper
classification physics.optics
keywords volumetricadditivemanufacturingphase-onlylightmodulatorholographic3DprintingspecklereductionBesselbeamaxiconphaseMEMSmicromirrorstomographicreconstruction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first volumetric 3D printing system built around a phase-only light modulator, a MEMS chip whose micromirrors move like pistons to imprint phase delays rather than block light. The authors' central claim is that phase encoding with this device converts laser power into printed patterns roughly 70 times more efficiently than the binary amplitude patterns used in standard tomographic additive manufacturing, and about twice as efficiently as holographic phase encoding on a digital micromirror device. Using a 405 nm single-mode laser diode, they print objects from 4 to 8 mm tall in 23 to 61 seconds with 18 to 50 mW of laser power. To make the holographic projections usable for printing, they convolved each computer-generated hologram with an axicon phase to create low-divergence Bessel-like beams over the print depth, and they time-multiplexed nine laterally shifted reconstructions per angle to average out speckle. If right, this makes volumetric printing practical with inexpensive, low-power laser diodes and purely digital scaling across length scales.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is the MEMS phase-only light modulator: a piston-array chip in which each micromirror's vertical displacement, with 16 discrete 4-bit levels up to a phase delay of $2\pi$, delays reflected light without absorbing it. Around this device, the argument is carried by two optical mechanisms. First, an axicon phase added to each computer-generated hologram turns the focal-plane reconstruction into a superposition of Bessel-like beams, extending the depth over which the straight-ray tomographic dose model is valid. Second, speckle reduction is achieved by convolving each computer-generated hologram with nine axicon phases whose vertices are shifted laterally by about half the measured speckle grain size; the resin integrates the time-multiplexed sequence, averaging intensity peaks and valleys. The pipeline quantizes the phase maps to 4 bits and drives the modulator at 720 to 1440 Hz, synchronized to vial rotation.

What would settle it

Print a series of test bars with widths from 10 to 100 micrometres under the same holographic pipeline and measure the printed widths against the tomographic prediction; the width at which prints deviate from the straight-ray dose profile would mark the true resolution floor of the method.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's discovery is that replacing amplitude modulators with a MEMS phase-only light modulator in holographic tomographic volumetric additive manufacturing changes the light budget decisively: a 4-bit, 16-level piston-mirror array reaches a measured pattern efficiency of 23.78%, about 70 times the roughly 0.34% typical of amplitude DMD projection, and about 2.4 times the roughly 9.71% of DMD-based phase holograms. With this efficient light engine, the authors demonstrate that a 405 nm single-mode laser diode suffices to polymerize a commercial acrylate resin with TPO photoinitiator, printing a 4 mm fusilli in 32 seconds at 18 mW, an 8 mm bunny model in 61 seconds at 50 mW, and DNA-helix models in 23 to 38.5 seconds at 20 mW. To keep the reconstruction sharply in focus across the vial's inner diameter, each hologram is convolved with an axicon phase, turning every image pixel into a Bessel-like beam whose depth of focus exceeds that of a Gaussian focus; speckle is suppressed by time-multiplexing nine versions of each projection with the axicon vertex shifted by about half the measured 43.42 micrometre speckle grain size, lowering the speckle contrast coefficient to 0.33. The work thereby positions the phase-only light modulator as a fast, polarization-insensitive phase engine that removes the need for the binary-amplitude phase-encoding tricks used with digital micromirror devices.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that light travels in straight rays through the resin, a premise the paper itself limits to features above about 30 micrometres, and the smallest printable feature is not measured.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Volumetric printers can be built around low-cost, single-mode UV laser diodes instead of high-power multi-mode sources, because the phase-only engine wastes little light.
  • Objects from hundreds of micrometres to centimetres can be produced by digitally rescaling the same holographic pipeline, with no change to the optics.
  • The nine-hologram speckle averaging suppresses surface granularity and reduces filament formation and delamination in printed parts.
  • Phase-only modulation at 720 to 1440 Hz with 4-bit levels is fast enough for rotation-synchronized printing, opening the same modulator class to other high-speed holographic applications.
  • Because the axicon phase extends depth of focus, tall vials can be printed with more uniform resolution without scanning the focus axially.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the resolution floor set by the 30 micrometre straight-ray limit is a testable claim; printing a resolution target would map how much of the axicon-extended depth of field actually preserves fidelity.
  • Beyond the paper: the reported 70-fold gain in the abstract and results and the 58-fold gain in the conclusion likely refer to different baselines, so anyone comparing this engine with another should normalize to the same input-power-to-pattern-power definition.
  • Beyond the paper: the same time-multiplexed, laterally shifted axicon-reconstruction scheme could be transferred to other coherent-illumination tasks, such as high-speed wavefront shaping or holographic near-eye displays, wherever speckle limits uniformity.
  • Beyond the paper: because each image pixel becomes a Bessel-like beam with sidelobes, printed voxels may be slightly elongated or receive extra off-axis dose; measuring axial dose profiles would clarify how the Bessel structure shapes resolution.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a holographic tomographic volumetric additive manufacturing (HoloVAM) system built around a Texas Instruments MEMS phase-only light modulator (PLM) with 16 phase levels. The authors calibrate the PLM, measure a pattern efficiency of 23.78% at the printing plane, compare it with 0.34% for a DMD amplitude pattern and 9.71% for DMD phase encoding, and claim a 70-fold efficiency gain over amplitude encoding. To avoid depth-of-focus limitations, they add an axicon phase to the computer-generated hologram so that each reconstructed image point becomes a Bessel beam, and they time-multiplex nine laterally shifted axicon holograms per projection angle to reduce speckle (speckle contrast down to 0.33). They demonstrate printed acrylate objects: a fusilli (4 mm, 32 s, 18 mW), Stanford bunnies (8 mm and 4 mm, 61 s/38.5 s, 50/20 mW), and DNA helices, claiming improved surface quality with speckle reduction. The abstract claims printing from hundreds of micrometers to centimeters and the conclusion claims high-fidelity parts, both of which exceed the demonstrated 4–8 mm object sizes and lack dimensional verification.

Significance. If the efficiency and printing results withstand scrutiny, this work is significant for volumetric additive manufacturing: it demonstrates that a MEMS phase-only modulator can replace a DMD-based light engine with a large gain in laser power efficiency, short print times, and compatibility with low-cost single-mode 405 nm laser diodes. The speckle-reduction scheme based on multiplexed off-axis axicons is a useful engineering contribution, and the measured speckle contrast values are consistent with standard 1/sqrt(N) averaging behavior, which is an independent check rather than a circular derivation. The paper also provides a practical description of PLM calibration and control, which will be useful to other researchers. However, the significance of the demonstration is limited by the absence of quantitative print-fidelity metrics, and the scale claims in the abstract overstate what is experimentally shown.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results, 'Holographic Projections' section; Methods, 'Time Multiplexing' and Supplementary Note 4, Eq. (S-3)] The paper explicitly states that the tomographic method assumes straight light rays and that this assumption fails below roughly 30 µm feature size, yet the presented pipeline replaces each reconstructed spot with an axicon-generated Bessel beam. A Bessel beam is not a straight ray: its central lobe carries only part of the power, its rings deposit dose outside the intended voxel, and the off-axis axicon introduces a small angular tilt (acknowledged in Supplementary Note 4 and Fig. 10). The manuscript reports speckle contrast but provides no measurement of how the time-integrated 3D dose distribution compares with the target tomographic projections, no resolution or linewidth measurement, and no dimensional-accuracy assessment of any printed object. This is load-bearing because the central claim of printing 'high-fidelity' parts across scales depends on the dose distribution matching the tomographic target at the feature sizes claimed. The authors should add a direct fidelity test, e.g., printing known test structures and measuring their dimensions, or an MTF/PSF characterization of the projection pipeline, and relate the result to the '>30 µm' validity criterion cited from ref. 24.
  2. [Abstract; Fig. 5] The abstract claims 'printing across different scales from hundreds of micrometers to centimeters using only digital control,' but the largest demonstrated object is 8 mm high (Fig. 5b) and the smallest is 4 mm high; no sub-millimeter object and no centimeter-scale object is shown. The phrase 'hundreds of micrometers' may refer to feature sizes, but no feature-size measurement is provided, so the claim is unsubstantiated as written. The conclusion's 'high-fidelity printed parts' is similarly not backed by dimensional metrology. Please either provide demonstrations and measurements that support the abstract's scale claims or revise the claims to match the demonstrated 4–8 mm object range.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Conclusion vs. Abstract/Results] The abstract and Results state a 70-fold efficiency increase, while the Conclusion says '58 times more efficient.' The measured values in Table 1 give 23.78% / 0.34% = 69.9, so the '58 times' appears to be a typographical error and should be corrected.
  2. [Throughout] Unit notation is corrupted in several places, e.g., '4 𝜇𝜇𝜇𝜇 high fusilli' should presumably be 4 mm, '11 𝜇𝜇𝜇𝜇' for the vial inner diameter should be 11 mm, and '43.42 𝜇𝜇𝜇𝜇' should be 43.42 µm. The manuscript appears to have been through a rendering that duplicated the Greek mu symbol; please verify all physical units.
  3. [Headings and text] There are typographical errors in headings and text, e.g., 'A Computation Pipeline for Using a Phase a PLM' and 'Materials and Methods session' should be 'section.' Please proofread the manuscript carefully.
  4. [Supplementary Note 2, Eq. (S-1)] In the power spectral density equation (S-1), the symbols L and m are not clearly defined; the text says 'vertical and horizontal components of the image' but not their units or whether they are image dimensions in pixels or physical units. Please define them explicitly.
  5. [Introduction and Conclusion] The phrase 'the first 3D printing platform utilizing a phase-only light modulator' should be qualified: if any prior phase-only LCOS-based volumetric printing systems exist, they should be cited and discussed; otherwise, the claim should be narrowed to 'first MEMS PLM-based' to avoid overstatement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: all central claims rest on measured efficiencies, speckle-contrast data, and printed objects, not on fitted parameters or self-citation chains.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are experimental: PLM phase calibration, measured pattern efficiency (23.78% for the PLM), measured speckle contrast versus lateral displacement, and printed macroscopic objects. The hologram pipeline (CGH from Gerchberg-Saxton, added axicon phase, nine shifted reconstructions) is not used to predict a quantity that is then compared with the same data; instead, the projections are directly measured and the prints are inspected. The 70x efficiency ratio is arithmetic between the independently measured PLM efficiency and DMD efficiencies reported in the authors' prior work (ref. 13), but those DMD values are external measured benchmarks, not fitted parameters, and they are used for comparison rather than as a hidden input to a derived result. The straight-ray validity threshold (>30 µm) is supported by citation to a wave-optical model (ref. 24) that does not depend on this paper's outputs. Speckle reduction is validated against the standard 1/sqrt(N) theoretical trend, which is independent confirmation rather than circular reasoning. The internal inconsistency between the abstract's 70x and the conclusion's 58x efficiency increase is a numerical/editorial discrepancy, not circularity. No step in the derivation reduces by construction to its own input, and no load-bearing argument relies solely on a self-citation that is itself unverified. Therefore, no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard Fourier optics and speckle statistics plus a domain assumption about the validity of straight-ray tomography at the printed feature sizes. The only under-specified design parameter is the axicon cone angle. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • Axicon cone angle (bottom angle alpha)
    The axicon phase in Eq. S-2 uses an angle alpha; its numerical value determines the Bessel beam depth of focus and the lateral shift per offset, but the value is not reported in the manuscript, making exact reproduction impossible.
  • Number of multiplexed holograms per angle Np = 9
    Chosen for speckle reduction; the measured contrast (0.33) matches 1/sqrt(9).
  • Lateral vertex offsets = 0.65, 9.50, 22.35, 29.07, 33.09 micrometers, optimal near 22 micrometers
    The offsets are chosen relative to the measured speckle grain size (43.42 micrometers); the near-optimal displacement is approximately half the grain size.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Straight-ray tomography is valid for features greater than 30 micrometers (ref 24).
    The entire holographic projection pipeline uses tomographic projections computed via the Radon transform; the paper explicitly cites the 30 micrometer threshold from Wechsler et al.
  • domain assumption The photoresin integrates the time-multiplexed intensity linearly as a dose accumulation.
    Speckle averaging and multi-angle dose addition assume the polymerization threshold depends on accumulated light dose, a standard assumption in VAM.
  • standard math Gerchberg-Saxton phase retrieval converges to a phase pattern whose Fourier intensity matches the target.
    The CGH h(u,v) is computed with GS; convergence is assumed without error analysis.
  • standard math Adding an axicon phase in the hologram plane creates a convolution of the reconstruction with the axicon point spread function, a Bessel-like beam.
    This is a Fourier optics property; the paper relies on it to extend the depth of focus.
  • standard math Uncorrelated speckle patterns from N shifted holograms reduce contrast by 1/sqrt(N).
    The model curve in Fig. 4b and the measured minima (c=0.45 for Np=5, c=0.33 for Np=9) match this statistical result.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High Light-Efficiency Holographic Tomographic Volumetric Additive Manufacturing using a MEMS-based Phase-only Light Modulator." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/L7HLZIML

@misc{pith2026250602578,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High Light-Efficiency Holographic Tomographic Volumetric Additive Manufacturing using a MEMS-based Phase-only Light Modulator},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/L7HLZIML}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.02578}
}
read the original abstract

Light-based 3D printing, which relies on photocurable resins, has shown the capability to produce complex geometries with high resolution and fidelity. Tomographic Volumetric Additive Manufacturing (TVAM) employs a digital micromirror device (DMD) to project high-speed sequences of amplitude light patterns into a rotating resin volume, enabling rapid fabrication of 3D structures through photopolymerization. Typically, the light projection efficiency in such binary amplitude modulator-based systems is below a few percent. Recent advancements introduced phase encoding in TVAM using binary amplitude modulators, improving depth control and boosting light projection efficiency to approximately 10%. This was achieved by implementing the Lee hologram technique to encode phase into binary amplitude patterns. In this work, we present the first 3D printing platform utilizing a phase-only light modulator (PLM), based on an array of micro-electro-mechanical pistons. Compared to amplitude encoding, phase encoding with the PLM yields a 70-fold increase in laser power efficiency. By coupling this efficient light engine with a speckle reduction method in holographic volumetric additive manufacturing (HoloVAM), we experimentally demonstrate printing across different scales from hundreds of micrometers to centimeters using only digital control. The PLM opens up new avenues in volumetric AM for holographic techniques using low-cost single-mode UV laser diodes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.02578 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Optical configuration and light efficiency. a. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Hologram Computation for printing with PLM. a. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Pipeline to generate a holographic projection with a reduced speckle. a. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Evaluation graphs for the speckle noise reduction technique. a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Examples of printed objects with holographic VAM using PLM. a. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Surface quality improvement comparison. a. Zoom in of a DNA double helix printed without the speckle noise reduction technique. b. Zoom in of a DNA double helix printed with the speckle noise reduction technique. Images from inspection camera 1 (left) and post-processe…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: a-b, angular shift of the axicon axil intensity). To evaluate the shift imparted to the holographic projection, we determined the intensity centroid position of the reconstructed gear pattern along the propagation distance. The Intensity Centroid is a spatial intensity…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Phase hologram used to generate holographic projections with a lateral shift. a Left: Phase hologram of the off-axis axicon convolved with the calculated computer-generated hologram (CGH) of a gear. Right: Plot of the gear intensity centroid position over the axial pr…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Nuñez Bernal, P . et al. Volumetric Bioprinting of Complex Living-Tissue Constructs within Seconds. Adv. Mater 31, (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    & Jachowicz, R

    Jamróz, W., Szafraniec, J., Kurek, M. & Jachowicz, R. 3D Printing in Pharmaceutical and Medical Applications – Recent Achievements and Challenges. Pharm Res 35, 176 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Frazier, W. E. Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 23, 1917–1928 (2014)

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Automatic method for fabricating a three-dimensional plastic model with photo-hardening polymer

    Kodama, H. Automatic method for fabricating a three-dimensional plastic model with photo-hardening polymer. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 52, 1770–1773 (1981)

    work page 1981

  5. [5]

    & Stucker, B

    Gibson, I., Rosen, D. & Stucker, B. Additive Manufacturing Technologies: 3D Printing, Rapid Prototyping, and Direct Digital Manufacturing. (Springer New York, New York, NY , 2015). doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3

    doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3 2015

  6. [6]

    & Hui, D

    Wang, X., Jiang, M., Zhou, Z., Gou, J. & Hui, D. 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective. Composites Part B: Engineering 110, 442–458 (2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    & Chryssolouris, G

    Bikas, H., Stavropoulos, P . & Chryssolouris, G. Additive manufacturing methods and modelling approaches: a critical review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Hahn, V. et al. Rapid Assembly of Small Materials Building Blocks (Voxels) into Large Functional 3D Metamaterials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1907795 (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 39 references
  1. [9]

    Kelly, B. E. et al. Volumetric additive manufacturing via tomographic reconstruction. Science 363, 1075–1079 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    & Moser, C

    Loterie, D., Delrot, P . & Moser, C. High-resolution tomographic volumetric additive manufacturing. Nat Commun 11, 852 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    Regehly, M. et al. Xolography for linear volumetric 3D printing. Nature 588, 620–624 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    Hahn, V. et al. Light-sheet 3D microprinting via two-colour two-step absorption. Nat. Photon. 16, 784–791 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    Álvarez-Castaño, M. I. et al. Holographic tomographic volumetric additive manufacturing. Nat Commun 16, 1551 (2025)

    2025

  6. [14]

    & Gong, L

    Ren, Y .-X., Lu, R.-D. & Gong, L. Tailoring light with a digital micromirror device: Tailoring light with a digital micromirror device. ANNALEN DER PHYSIK 527, 447–470 (2015)

    2015

  7. [15]

    A., Gallego-Ruiz, R

    Correa-Rojas, N. A., Gallego-Ruiz, R. D. & Álvarez-Castaño, M. I. Generation of linearly polarized modes using a digital micromirror device and phase optimization. Computer Optics 46, (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Otón, J., Ambs, P ., Millán, M. S. & Pérez-Cabré, E. Multipoint phase calibration for improved compensation of inherent wavefront distortion in parallel aligned liquid crystal on silicon displays. Appl. Opt. 46, 5667 (2007)

    2007

  9. [17]

    & Osten, W

    Haist, T. & Osten, W. Holography using pixelated spatial light modulators—part 1: theory and basic considerations. J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS 14, 041310 (2015)

    2015

  10. [18]

    & Lee, W

    Wu, P .-C., Yang, S.-Y . & Lee, W. Recovery of UV-degraded electrical properties of nematic liquid crystals doped with TiO2 nanoparticles. Journal of Molecular Liquids 218, 150–155 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    & Wu, S.-T

    Yang, Q., Zou, J., Li, Y . & Wu, S.-T. Fast-Response Liquid Crystal Phase Modulators with an Excellent Photostability. Crystals 10, 765 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    A., McDonald, B

    Bartlett, T. A., McDonald, B. C. & Hall, J. Adapting Texas Instruments DLP technology to demonstrate a phase spatial light modulator. in Emerging Digital Micromirror Device Based Systems and Applications XI (eds. Douglass, M. R., Lee, B. L. & Ehmke, J.) 27 (SPIE, San Francisco...

    2019 doi

  13. [21]

    Rocha, J. C. A. et al. Fast and light-efficient wavefront shaping with a MEMS phase-only light modulator. Opt. Express 32, 43300 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    & Liang, J

    Kilcullen, P ., Liu, J., Wang, Y ., Gong, L. & Liang, J. High-speed complex field modulation using binary phase-engraved superpixels. gxjzz 6, 1 (2025)

    2025

  15. [23]

    Fuentes, J. L. M., Fernández, E. J., Prieto, P . M. & Artal, P . Interferometric method for phase calibration in liquid crystal spatial light modulators using a self-generated diffraction-grating. Opt. Express 24, 14159 (2016)

    2016

  16. [24]

    & Moser, C

    Wechsler, F., Gigli, C., Madrid-Wolff, J. & Moser, C. Wave optical model for tomographic volumetric additive manufacturing. Opt. Express 32, 14705 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    & Tiziani, H

    Haist, T., Schönleber, M. & Tiziani, H. J. Computer-generated holograms from 3D-objects written on twisted-nematic liquid crystal displays. Optics Communications 140, 299–308 (1997)

    1997

  18. [26]

    Madsen, A. G. & Glückstad, J. HoloTile: Rapid and speckle-suppressed digital holography by matched sub-hologram tiling and point spread function shaping. Optics Communications 525, 128876 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    Choi, S. et al. Time-multiplexed Neural Holography: A flexible framework for holographic near-eye displays with fast heavily-quantized spatial light modulators. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.02367 (2022)

    2022 doi arXiv

  20. [28]

    Goodman, J. W. Some fundamental properties of speckle*. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66, 1145 (1976)

    1976

  21. [29]

    Zhou, L., Gan, J., Liu, X., Xu, L. & Lu, W. Speckle-noise-reduction method of projecting interferometry fringes based on power spectrum density. Appl. Opt. 51, 6974 (2012)

    2012

  22. [30]

    & Herrera-Ramirez, J

    Restrepo, J., Correa-Rojas, N. & Herrera-Ramirez, J. Speckle Noise Reduction in Digital Holography Using a DMD and Multi-Hologram Resampling. Applied Sciences 10, 8277 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Campos, J. et al. Characterization of the Liquid Crystal Display Modulation. Optimization for Some Applications. Acta Phys. Pol. A 101, 189–200 (2002)

    2002

  24. [32]

    & Bigue, L

    Ambs, P . & Bigue, L. Characterization of an analog ferroelectric spatial light modulator: application to dynamic diffractive optical elements and optical information processing. in 103020I (Bellingham, United States, 2001). doi:10.1117/12.449680

    2001 doi

  25. [33]

    Macfaden, A. J. & Wilkinson, T. D. Characterization, design, and optimization of a two- pass twisted nematic liquid crystal spatial light modulator system for arbitrary complex modulation. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 34, 161 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    Webber, D. et al. Micro-optics fabrication using blurred tomography. Optica 11, 665 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Mathematica

    Wolfram Research, Inc. Mathematica. (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    The MathWorks Inc. MATLAB. The MathWorks Inc. (2022)

    2022

  29. [38]

    Zhai, Z. et al. Parallel Bessel beam arrays generated by envelope phase holograms. Optics and Lasers in Engineering 161, 107348 (2023). Supplementary Information High Light-Efficiency Holographic Tomographic Volumetric Additive Manufacturing using a Phase-only Light Modulator ...

    2023

  30. [39]

    How to Shape Light with Spatial Light Modulators

    Carmelo Rosales-Guzmán & Andrew Forbes. How to Shape Light with Spatial Light Modulators. (SPIE Press, 2017)

    2017

  31. [40]

    Zhai, Z. et al. Parallel Bessel beam arrays generated by envelope phase holograms. Optics and Lasers in Engineering 161, 107348 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.