Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 30 references

Advanced microwave photonic waveform editing: enabling the evolution of radar systems into joint radar and spectrum sensing systems

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Any radar waveform, edited by a binary sequence derived from its accumulation function, compresses into a narrow pulse and gains frequency-to-time mapping, giving non-LFM radars spectrum-sensing ability.

desk verdict A practical editing trick that extends FTTM spectrum sensing to non-LFM radar waveforms, backed by solid experiments, but the theory glosses over the CS-SSB modulator's analytic-signal response. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.02583 v1 pith:FSRTWP5R submitted 2025-06-03 physics.optics

Chi Jiang , Taixia Shi , Dingding Liang , Lei Gao , Chulun Lin , Yang Chen This is my paper
classification physics.optics
keywords microwavephotonicsfrequency-to-timemappingwaveformeditingaccumulationfunctionspectrumsensingfrequencymeasurementtime-frequencyanalysisBarkerphase-codedradar
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that any radar waveform — phase-coded, nonlinearly frequency-modulated, or otherwise — can be edited in the optical domain so that it gains spectrum-sensing capability without generating a separate wideband LFM signal. The editing is a binary sequence, computed from the waveform's accumulation function after a dispersive fiber, that flips the sign of waveform segments which would otherwise cancel the compressed pulse. After editing, the waveform compresses into a narrow pulse in the fiber, mapping frequency to time, so it can measure signal frequencies and draw time-frequency diagrams. The authors demonstrate the idea on a 7-bit Barker phase-coded waveform, an LFM waveform, an NLFM waveform, and a waveform with an 'E' time-frequency diagram, over a 36.8 GHz analysis bandwidth, with 2 ns temporal resolution and 0.86 GHz frequency resolution. If the claim holds, joint radar-and-spectrum-sensing systems become feasible for radars that do not use LFM signals, using only a 1-bit DAC to generate the editing sequence.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the accumulation function, $\mathrm{AF}(t_r) = \int_0^{t_r} E^2(\tau) \exp(j \tau^2 / (2\beta L)) \, d\tau$, which records how each time segment of the optical waveform contributes positively or negatively to the intensity of the compressed pulse at $t=0$ after the dispersive fiber; the binary sequence is its sign pattern. The sequence is applied at a second dual-parallel Mach-Zehnder modulator biased for carrier-suppressed single-sideband operation, so the editing term $m_a(\tau) = \mathrm{Hilbert}[v(t)]$ multiplies the optical field by +1 or -1 over each segment. The result is a waveform whose accumulation function is approximately monotonically increasing, matching the accumulation function of an LFM signal whose chirp rate $k$ obeys the dispersion-match condition $k = -1/(2\pi \beta L)$. The analysis bandwidth $B = T_r^2 / (2\pi \beta L)$ and the frequency resolution $\delta f \approx 0.886 / T_r$, inherited from the LFM-based method the paper extends, then apply to the edited waveform while the approximation holds.

What would settle it

Delay the binary sequence relative to the radar waveform in steps finer than the bit period while recording the compressed-pulse amplitude: the accumulation model predicts the pulse should vanish near a 1171.875 ps mismatch, where the positive and negative contributions cancel, and recover near 2000 ps, where the next-period alignment returns. A more direct test: take a waveform whose time-frequency slope reverses within one binary segment, so the accumulation function oscillates inside a single segment, and check whether the edited waveform still compresses to one narrow pulse with the predicted width; a split or broadened pulse would show the monotonic-accumulation approximation has failed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that pulse compression in a dispersive medium does not require the input to be an LFM signal. For any waveform, the paper defines an accumulation function — a running integral of the waveform's squared complex envelope weighted by the dispersion kernel — that records whether each time segment contributes to or cancels the optical intensity at the compressed-pulse instant after the fiber. Editing multiplies the cancelling segments by -1 through a second dual-parallel Mach-Zehnder modulator driven by a binary sequence, so the edited waveform's accumulation function approximates that of an LFM signal matched to the dispersion. The edited waveform is then compressed into a narrow pulse by the dispersion-compensating fiber, and a signal under test, loaded at the modulator in carrier-suppressed double-sideband form, produces two symmetric pulses whose time separation encodes its frequency. The paper reports this frequency-to-time mapping working for a 7-bit Barker phase-coded waveform, an unmatched LFM waveform, an NLFM waveform, and a waveform with an 'E' time-frequency diagram across a 36.8 GHz analysis bandwidth.

Load-bearing premise

The scheme stands or falls on the editing modulator multiplying each segment of the optical field by exactly +1 or -1 with negligible distortion and timing error across the full 20.7 GHz bandwidth; Section 4.3 shows that a timing mismatch of about 1171.875 ps makes the compressed pulse vanish, so the method is only as good as the synchronization and bandwidth fidelity of the binary editing channel.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Phase-coded and other non-LFM radar waveforms can be upgraded into joint radar-and-spectrum-sensing signals by optical editing, without generating a separate wideband LFM signal.
  • The editing sequence needs only a 1-bit DAC, which the paper argues cuts the cost and generation complexity compared with directly synthesizing an LFM signal for sensing.
  • When the radar waveform already occupies bandwidth, the binary sequence's required bandwidth shrinks while the edited waveform's bandwidth stays wide: roughly 10 GHz input waveforms plus 10 GHz binary sequences produce about 20 GHz edited waveforms.
  • Frequency resolution is set by the temporal length of the edited segment rather than the zero-padding: shortening the binary sequence from 1.125 ns to 0.734375 ns worsens the measured resolution from 0.86 GHz to 1.41 GHz, as the theory predicts.
  • For a fixed temporal resolution, lower dispersion raises the analysis bandwidth (46.4 GHz at -5396 ps/nm versus 36.8 GHz at -6817 ps/nm) at the cost of coarser frequency resolution.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The accumulation-function design is a general recipe rather than a chirp-specific trick: any dispersive element with a known kernel defines a matched sign pattern, so the editing idea could transfer to chirped fiber Bragg gratings, arrayed-waveguide dispersive lines, or even digital post-processing of captured signals.
  • The timing-mismatch result (the compressed pulse vanishes at about a 1.17 ns offset) implies that a deployed joint radar and sensing system would need clock-grade synchronization between the radar-waveform channel and the editing-sequence channel; the laboratory's digital delay adjustment may not survive field temperature and vibration drifts without feedback.
  • The editing principle could be inverted into a design rule: future radar waveforms could be chosen so that their accumulation functions are already monotonically increasing, making them spectrum-sensing-ready without any editing hardware.
  • Since the binary sequence approximates the sign of the matched LFM phase, a natural extension is multi-level editing sequences that reduce quantization error and pulse sidelobes at the price of a somewhat higher DAC resolution.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes and experimentally demonstrates a microwave photonic waveform-editing technique intended to convert arbitrary radar waveforms into waveforms that can be compressed by a fixed dispersive element, thereby enabling frequency-to-time mapping for spectrum sensing. The editing sequence is designed from an 'accumulation function' of the waveform after propagation through a dispersive medium; after editing, the accumulation function is claimed to approximate that of a linearly frequency-modulated signal matched to the medium. The concept is tested with a CW waveform, a 7-bit Barker phase-coded waveform, an LFM waveform, an NLFM waveform, and a waveform with an 'E' time-frequency diagram, achieving frequency measurement and time-frequency analysis over a 36.8 GHz bandwidth with a 2 ns temporal resolution and about 0.86 GHz frequency resolution.

Significance. If the theoretical model is correct, the method offers a practical path toward joint radar and spectrum sensing for non-LFM radars, with the attractive feature that the editing sequence can be generated by a 1-bit DAC. The experimental work is substantial: it covers several waveform families, includes statistical frequency-measurement data, compares simulation and experiment for edited waveforms, and includes a dedicated study of delay mismatch. These experiments support the hardware-level claim that edited waveforms can be compressed and used for frequency-to-time mapping. The main limitations are in the theoretical formulation of the editing operation itself and in the definition and use of the accumulation function; both need to be corrected before the central claim is fully established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (8)] The physical editing operation is not a real ±1 multiplication. A CS-SSB modulator driven by a real binary voltage v(τ) multiplies the optical complex envelope by the analytic signal m_a(τ)=v(τ)+jH[v](τ), as the paper itself states. For a nonconstant binary sequence, H[v] is nonzero and contains broad spectral content near bit transitions, so the edited optical field is not the real sign-multiplied waveform assumed by the design rule. The sentence 'the portions of the optical waveform that positively contribute ... are multiplied by 1, while ... by −1' is therefore inconsistent with Eq. (8). Because the binary sequence is designed under the real-±1 model, the edited accumulation function realized in the experiment is not necessarily the one computed in Eq. (8). The paper should either derive the design rule explicitly using m_a(τ)=v(τ)+jH[v](τ) and justify the real-sign approximation with a quantitative comparison (simulated and measured edited waveforms and compressed pulses for both models), or use a modulator implementation that truly multiplies by ±1. Section 4.3's timing-mismatch study does not address this quadrature-component issue.
  2. [Section 2, Eq. (7) and Fig. 1(c)] Eq. (7) defines the accumulation function as the squared modulus of an integral, which is nonnegative for all upper limits t_r. The text and Fig. 1(c), however, describe 'positive impact' and 'negative impact' and use the sign of the accumulation function to decide where to multiply by +1 or −1. A squared modulus cannot carry the sign information needed by the design rule. If the intended quantity is the complex integral before taking the modulus, or the rate of change of AF with respect to the upper limit, that quantity should be defined explicitly and the binary-sequence rule reformulated in terms of it. As written, Eq. (7) is insufficient to reproduce the binary sequences shown in Figs. 1(d), 3(a), and 5(b).
  3. [Section 2, Figs. 1(f)–(g)] The claim that the edited accumulation function approximates that of an LFM signal is largely enforced by construction, because the binary sequence is computed from the same accumulation function that is subsequently used for comparison. The measured pulse compression and frequency-to-time mapping in Sections 3.2–3.4 provide independent experimental support, and that is the strongest evidence in the paper. The manuscript should explicitly separate the constructed property (AF matching) from the experimentally tested consequences (pulse compression and frequency mapping), and ideally demonstrate the editing rule on a waveform whose accumulation target was not used in the design procedure, in order to provide a genuinely predictive test.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 4.3, Fig. 9] The text says a delay mismatch of 1171.875 ns completely destroys the compressed pulse, while the immediately following values are given in ps and the signal period is 2 ns; presumably 1171.875 ps is intended.
  2. [Section 2, Eq. (8) and Fig. 1(e)] The notation v(t)=v cos[m(t)] with m(t) equal to 0 or π implies a baseband ±v waveform, which is inconsistent with the oscillatory waveforms plotted as the binary sequence in Figs. 1(e) and 3(a). Please define the carrier frequency and modulation format of the binary sequence explicitly.
  3. [Section 3.2] The statement that the binary sequence can be generated by a 1-bit DAC is not demonstrated in the experiments, since a multi-bit AWG is used. It would be helpful to state the required sampling rate and timing jitter for the 1-bit approach and to indicate the expected penalty relative to the multi-bit AWG.
  4. [Section 4.4, Fig. 10] The method used to observe the edited waveform introduces an additional optical carrier, and the resulting self-beating component in the measured electrical spectrum should be quantified or suppressed in the comparison between simulation and experiment.
  5. [References] Reference [9] lists page numbers 14438–14450 that appear to belong to a different article; please verify the citation details.
  6. [Section 2, Eq. (9)] Equation (9) should state explicitly that the dispersion βL is taken in absolute value when computing the analysis bandwidth, since the DCF dispersion is negative.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the edited-accumulation match is a design objective, experiments are independent, and self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained rather than circular. The binary sequence is computed from the accumulation function of the unedited waveform (Eq. 7) so that the edited waveform's accumulation function becomes monotonic; the statement that the edited accumulation function approximates that of an LFM signal is therefore the design goal, not an independent prediction. The independent content is supplied by the experimental pulse-compression and frequency-measurement results against known single-tone and time-frequency SUTs (Figs. 3-6), which test the physical system end to end. The self-citations in the paper are not load-bearing: Ref. [17] is used for a contextual limitation of a different method, Ref. [25] accompanies parameter relations that are re-derived here in Eqs. (9)-(10), and Ref. [27] is one of several prior-work citations. The CS-SSB concern raised in the skeptical reading, namely that the physical multiplier is v(t)+jH[v](t) rather than a real ±1 sequence, is a correctness/validity gap about whether Eq. (8) describes the actual modulator, not a circularity in which an output is equivalent to an input by construction. No specific circular reduction can be exhibited, so no circularity step is scored.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to the output; the binary sequence is computed from the stated dispersion model and hardware settings. The central claims rest on the validity of the dispersion-convolution model, ideal CS-SSB handling of the binary drive, linear additivity of segment contributions, and the ability to generate and synchronize a 20.7 GHz binary sequence. These are reasonable photonic assumptions, but they are not independently machine-checked or shipped as code.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Dispersive propagation through the DCF is modeled as convolution with a quadratic-phase kernel, so that the field at t=0 is the integral of the input field times exp(jτ²/(2βL)).
    Used in Eqs. (2), (6), (7), and (8); it is the standard dispersion-impulse-response model for single-mode fiber over the operating bandwidth.
  • domain assumption CS-SSB modulation by a binary drive v(t)=v·cos[m(t)] with m(t)=0 or π is represented by multiplying the optical field by the analytic signal m_a(τ)=Hilbert[v(t)].
    Invoked in Eq. (8) to justify that the binary sequence realizes +1/-1 polarity flips; approximate because the AWG bandwidth is limited to 20.7 GHz.
  • domain assumption The intensity at the compressed pulse position t=0 is governed by the squared modulus of the accumulated integral, and contributions from disjoint time intervals add linearly, so flipping the sign of a segment independently changes its contribution.
    This linearity is the basis for the sign-flip editing rule in Section 2; it is standard Fourier-optics linearity but is not explicitly proven.
  • ad hoc to paper The binary sequence and the arbitrary waveform can be generated and time-aligned with sufficient precision, with residual delay mismatch corrected in the digital domain.
    Section 4.3 shows that a 1171.875 ps mismatch completely destroys the compressed pulse, so the method depends critically on this engineering assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Advanced microwave photonic waveform editing: enabling the evolution of radar systems into joint radar and spectrum sensing systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FSRTWP5R

@misc{pith2026250602583,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Advanced microwave photonic waveform editing: enabling the evolution of radar systems into joint radar and spectrum sensing systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FSRTWP5R}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.02583}
}
read the original abstract

In response to the urgent demand for the development of future radar application platforms from single radar functionality towards integrated multi-functional systems, we show an advanced microwave photonic waveform editing method that enables the editing of arbitrary radar waveforms, equipping them with the capability to perform spectrum sensing. This, in turn, expands single-function radar systems into joint radar and spectrum sensing systems. We theoretically define and calculate the accumulation function of an arbitrary waveform after passing through a specific dispersive medium, and utilize this accumulation function to further design a corresponding binary sequence for editing the waveform. After editing, the accumulation function of the edited waveform approximates that of a linearly frequency-modulated signal matching the specific dispersive medium. Thus, the edited waveform can be compressed into a narrow pulse after passing through the dispersive medium, realizing the frequency-to-time mapping for achieving frequency measurement or time-frequency analysis. The concept is verified by a simulation and an experiment. Using a dispersion compensating fiber with a total dispersion of -6817 ps/nm, arbitrary waveforms, including a 7-bit Barker phase-coded waveform, a linearly frequency-modulated waveform, a nonlinearly frequency-modulated waveform, and a waveform with an "E" time-frequency diagram, are edited and further used for microwave frequency measurement and time-frequency analysis in an ultra-wide bandwidth of 36.8 GHz. The temporal resolution and frequency resolution are 2 ns and 0.86 GHz, respectively.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Radar-on-chip/in-package in autonomous driving vehicles and intelligent transport systems: opportunities and challenges,

    S. Saponara, M. S. Greco, and F. Gini, “Radar-on-chip/in-package in autonomous driving vehicles and intelligent transport systems: opportunities and challenges,” IEEE Signal Process Mag. 36(5), 71–84 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    MMW radar-based technologies in autonomous driving: a review,

    T. Zhou, M. Yang, K. Jiang, et al ., “MMW radar-based technologies in autonomous driving: a review,” Sensors. 20(24), 7283 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    New-generation hybrid guidance system based on infrared and millimeter waves ,

    C, Cheng, M. Gao, X. Cheng , et al., “New-generation hybrid guidance system based on infrared and millimeter waves ,” IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag. 33(7), 34–44 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    A fully photonics-based coherent radar system,

    P. Ghelfi, F. Laghezza, F. Scotti, et al., “A fully photonics-based coherent radar system,” Nature 507, 341–345 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Microwave photonic radars,

    S. Pan, Y. Zhang, “Microwave photonic radars,” J. Lightwave. Technol. 38(19), 5450–5484 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Experimental demonstration of a multi -target detection technique using an X -band optically steered phased array radar ,

    N. Shi, M. Li, Y. Deng, et al ., “Experimental demonstration of a multi -target detection technique using an X -band optically steered phased array radar ,” Opt. Express 24(13), 14438–14450 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    High-resolution range and velocity measurement based on photonic LFM microwave signal generation and detection,

    H. Cheng, X. Zou, B. Lu, et al., “High-resolution range and velocity measurement based on photonic LFM microwave signal generation and detection, ” IEEE Photonics J. 11(1), 1–8 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Analysis of spectrum requirements for autonomous driving using SINR probability distributions,

    S. Choi, S. Park, K. Kang, et al., “Analysis of spectrum requirements for autonomous driving using SINR probability distributions,” IEEE Commun. Lett. 24(1), 202–206 (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 30 references
  1. [9]

    Spectrum management for multi -access edge computing in autonomous vehicular networks,

    H. Peng, Q. Ye, X. Shen, “Spectrum management for multi -access edge computing in autonomous vehicular networks,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 24(13), 14438–14450 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    Introduction to electronic warfare,

    P. M. Grant and J. H. Collins, “Introduction to electronic warfare,” IEE Proc. F. 129(3), 113–132 (1982)

    1982

  3. [11]

    Identification and elimination of abnormal information in electromagnetic spectrum cognition ,

    H. Zhao, R. Wu, H. Han, et al ., “Identification and elimination of abnormal information in electromagnetic spectrum cognition ,” in Advanced Hybrid Information Processing(ADHIP) (2019), paper 77–88

    2019

  4. [12]

    Instantaneous microwave frequency measurement using a photonic microwave filter pair,

    S. Pan and J. Yao, “Instantaneous microwave frequency measurement using a photonic microwave filter pair,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 22(19), 1437–1439 (2010)

    2010

  5. [13]

    Wideband dynamic microwave frequency identification system using a low-power ultracompact silicon photonic chip,

    M. Burla, X. Wang, M. Li, et al ., “Wideband dynamic microwave frequency identification system using a low-power ultracompact silicon photonic chip,” Nat. Commun. 7, 13004 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    Short-time Fourier transform based on stimulated Brillouin scattering,

    P. Zuo, D. Ma, and Y. Chen, “Short-time Fourier transform based on stimulated Brillouin scattering,” J. Lightwave. Technol. 40(15), 5052–5061 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    Multiple-frequency measurement based on a Fourier domain mode -locked optoelectronic oscillator operating around oscillation threshold,

    T. Hao, J. Tang, N. Shi , et al ., “Multiple-frequency measurement based on a Fourier domain mode -locked optoelectronic oscillator operating around oscillation threshold,” Opt. Express 44(12), 3062–3065 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    Multiple radio frequency measurements with an improved frequency resolution based on stimulated Brillouin scattering with a reduced gain bandwidth,

    T. Shi and Y. Chen, “Multiple radio frequency measurements with an improved frequency resolution based on stimulated Brillouin scattering with a reduced gain bandwidth,” Opt. Lett. 46(14), 3460–3463 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Improving the accuracy and resolution of filter- and frequency-to-time mapping based time and frequency acquisition methods by broadening the filter bandwidth,

    P. Zuo, D. Ma, X. Li, et al., “Improving the accuracy and resolution of filter- and frequency-to-time mapping based time and frequency acquisition methods by broadening the filter bandwidth, ” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 71(8), 3668–3677 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    Compact photonics-assisted short-time Fourier transform for real-time spectral analysis,

    W. Dong, X. Chen, X. Cao, et al., “Compact photonics-assisted short-time Fourier transform for real-time spectral analysis,” J. Lightwave. Technol. 42(1), 194–200 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Photonic-assisted wideband microwave frequency measurement based on optical heterodyne detection,

    X. Li, Z. Fan, J. Su, et al., “Photonic-assisted wideband microwave frequency measurement based on optical heterodyne detection, ” Opt. Express 32(10), 18127–18138 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Microwave photonics frequency-to-time mapping based on a Fourier domain mode locked optoelectronic oscillator,

    T. Hao, J. Tang, W. Li, et al., “Microwave photonics frequency-to-time mapping based on a Fourier domain mode locked optoelectronic oscillator, ” Opt. Express 26(26), 33582–33591 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    Channelized analog microwave short-time Fourier transform in the optical domain,

    X. Li, T. Shi, D. Ma, et al., “Channelized analog microwave short-time Fourier transform in the optical domain, ” IEEE Trans. Micro w. Theory Tech. 72(5), 3210–3220 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Optical time-mapped spectrograms (I): From the time-lens Fourier transformer to the Talbot -based design,

    J. Azañ a and X. Zhu, “Optical time-mapped spectrograms (I): From the time-lens Fourier transformer to the Talbot -based design,” J. Lightwave. Technol. 41(14), 4609–4623 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Photonic compressive receiver for multiple microwave frequency measurement,

    S. Wang, G. Wu, Y. Sun, and J. Chen, “Photonic compressive receiver for multiple microwave frequency measurement, ” Opt. Exp ress 27(18), 25364 – 25374 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    Capturing ultra-broadband complex-fields of arbitrary duration using a real-time spectrogram,

    B. Crockett, C. Rowe, and J. Azañ a, “Capturing ultra-broadband complex-fields of arbitrary duration using a real-time spectrogram,” APL Photonics 8(6), 066108 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    Microwave photonic frequency measurement and time–frequency analysis: unlocking bandwidths over hundreds of GHz with a 10- nanosecond temporal resolution,

    T. Shi, C. Jiang, C. Lin, et al., “Microwave photonic frequency measurement and time–frequency analysis: unlocking bandwidths over hundreds of GHz with a 10- nanosecond temporal resolution,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. (2024) DOI: 10.1109/TMTT.2024.3516776

    2024

  18. [26]

    Photonics-enabled nanosecond scale real-time spectral analysis with 92 -GHz bandwidth and MHz resolution,

    X. Zhu, B. Crockett, C. M. L. Rowe, et al., “Photonics-enabled nanosecond scale real-time spectral analysis with 92 -GHz bandwidth and MHz resolution, ” in Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exhibition(OFC) (2023), paper. M1J.5

    2023

  19. [27]

    Seamlessly merging radar ranging and imaging, wireless communications, and spectrum sensing for 6G empowered by microwave photonics,

    T. Shi, Y. Chen, and J. Yao, “Seamlessly merging radar ranging and imaging, wireless communications, and spectrum sensing for 6G empowered by microwave photonics,” Commun. Eng. 3, 130 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Photonics -based dual -functional system for simultaneous high -resolution radar imaging and fast fr equency measurement,

    J. Shi, F. Zhang, X. Ye, et al ., “Photonics -based dual -functional system for simultaneous high -resolution radar imaging and fast fr equency measurement,” Opt. Lett. 44(8), 1948–1951 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Simultaneous radar detection and frequency measurement by broadband microwave photonic processing,

    J. Shi, F. Zhang, D. Ben, et al ., “Simultaneous radar detection and frequency measurement by broadband microwave photonic processing,” J. Lightwave. Technol. 38(8), 2171–2179 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    An integrated radar detection and microwave frequency measurement system based on an optically injected semiconductor laser,

    Z. Tang, P. Zho u, J. Zhu, et al., “An integrated radar detection and microwave frequency measurement system based on an optically injected semiconductor laser,” in Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exhibition(OFC) (2023), paper W4J.3

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.