Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 73 references

Phase Topology Stability of an Optical Vortex via an Electrically Controlled Twist-Planar Oriented Liquid Crystal Fresnel Lens

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read A vortex's charge is read from the number and tilt of its intensity zeros.

desk verdict Strong experimental demonstration of a switchable LC Fresnel lens for vortex sign readout, but the magnitude claim rests on an uncharacterized coherent background that the simulation sets by hand. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.02632 v1 pith:AXBSWP6O submitted 2025-06-03 physics.optics

classification physics.optics
keywords opticalvortextopologicalchargephasesingularityinstabilityliquidcrystalFresnellensastigmatictransformationorbitalangularmomentumelectricalswitching
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Optical vortices carry a topological charge $\ell$, but their high-order versions are unstable: under realistic conditions a vortex with $|\ell|>1$ fragments into $|\ell|$ single-charge vortices, each marking an isolated intensity zero in the far field. This paper claims that this instability can be used as the measurement itself. Through an electrically switchable liquid-crystal Fresnel lens, the focused vortex produces exactly $|\ell|$ zero-intensity points in the focal plane, and tilting the lens adds astigmatism that aligns those points along a line whose $\pm45^\circ$ orientation reveals the sign of $\ell$. Since the lens changes from a 3 V detection mode to a 35 V transmission mode without leaving the optical path, the setup reads both magnitude and sign of the topological charge in real time and without extra components. The practical payoff, if the claim is right, is a single compact element that assesses vortex phase-topology stability without a reference beam.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the controlled fragmentation of high-order vortices. The model writes the incident field as a coherent superposition of a Laguerre-Gaussian vortex and a weak Gaussian background, with signal amplitude $\alpha=0.998$ and the noise set to 0.4% of the intensity, so the $\ell$-fold singularity splits into $|\ell|$ unit-charge vortices in the focal plane. The twist-planar NLC Fresnel lens supplies the focusing and, when tilted, the astigmatic shear that aligns the resulting zeros; the sign readout comes from the $\pm45^\circ$ orientation of that alignment line relative to the plane of astigmatism.

What would settle it

Send a vortex with a known charge, say $\ell=+2$, through the lens while continuously increasing an added coherent background. If the number of isolated intensity zeros in the focal plane drops below 2, or the line through them no longer sits at $+45^\circ$ when the lens is tilted, the counting rule fails at a quantified noise level.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the phase topology of an optical vortex can be read unambiguously from its intensity profile in the Fourier plane of a lens. A vortex with topological charge $\ell$ passing through the NLC Fresnel lens decays into $|\ell|$ isolated first-order vortices, seen as $|\ell|$ zero-intensity points; rotating the lens about the vertical axis makes these zeros lie on a straight line at $+45^\circ$ for positive charge and $-45^\circ$ for negative charge. The authors support this with experiments for charges from $\pm1$ to $\pm8$ and with numerical propagation simulations, and they show that the same lens, driven at 3 V, operates as a detection mode while at 35 V it becomes transparent, so a vortex can be measured and then transmitted without changing the optical circuit.

Load-bearing premise

The method depends on the real beam containing enough coherent background to split a high-order vortex into exactly $|\ell|$ resolved unit-charge zeros, but not so much that the zeros merge or vanish; the simulation fixes this balance by hand with $\alpha=0.998$ rather than deriving it from a measured noise level.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The magnitude and sign of the topological charge can be obtained from a single intensity frame, without a reference wave or interferometric setup.
  • The same electrically controlled lens can alternate between topological-charge detection and undistorted vortex propagation, enabling in-line characterization.
  • Vortex stability in real environments can be assessed by transferring the far-field distribution to the Fourier plane, avoiding the need to move a camera over long distances.
  • The approach is not tied to the specific lens design, since a conventional spherical lens produced qualitatively identical vortex splitting in the paper.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication the paper leaves implicit: the same zero-counting rule could be packaged as an automated metrology tool, with a simple image-processing routine counting dark spots and measuring the tilt angle.
  • A testable extension would be to sweep the added coherent background amplitude continuously and measure how the zero pattern degrades; this could turn the device into a quantitative sensor of background coherence rather than a binary charge reader.
  • Because the sign is encoded only in the $\pm45^\circ$ orientation, the method presupposes a known astigmatism axis; calibrating that axis is likely the main practical constraint for field deployment.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports an electrically switchable twist-planar liquid crystal Fresnel lens and proposes its use as a compact, reconfigurable tool for determining the magnitude and sign of the topological charge of optical vortex beams. The device focuses the vortex, and the inherent instability of high-order vortices in the presence of a coherent background causes the beam to split into |ℓ| first-order vortices, producing |ℓ| isolated intensity zeros in the Fourier plane. Rotating the lens introduces astigmatism, which aligns the zeros along a line whose ±45° orientation encodes the sign of ℓ. The authors present experimental intensity distributions for ℓ = ±1 to ±8, a comparison with a spherical lens for ℓ = +3, and numerical simulations in Supplementary Note 4. They also demonstrate voltage-controlled switching between a 3 V 'topological charge detection' mode and a 35 V 'propagation' mode. The central claim is that the vortex topology can be unambiguously identified from the focal-plane intensity profile without adding further optical elements.

Significance. If the claims are substantiated, the device would provide a simple, low-power, and electrically reconfigurable path for vortex characterization, which is of interest for OAM communications, singular optics, and quantum photonics. The paper reports a fabricated device, detailed fabrication steps, experimental images for a wide range of topological charges, and a direct comparison with a spherical lens that supports the basic splitting effect. The sign determination via the astigmatic transformation is consistent with established theory (Vaity et al., Ref. 37). However, the quantitative reliability of the magnitude readout rests on an unmeasured coherent-background parameter in the simulation, and the 'unambiguous' claim is not backed by error statistics or a comparison with an independent technique. The significance is therefore conditional on the authors addressing these load-bearing gaps.

major comments (3)
  1. [Supplementary Note 4, Eq. (1)] The numerical model represents the incident field as E0 = α ELG + sqrt(1−α²) EG with α = 0.998, i.e., a 0.4% coherent Gaussian background. The resulting |ℓ|-zero pattern is a direct and expected consequence of this hand-chosen noise level, as the fragmentation of high-order vortices by a background is well documented (Refs. 33, 35, 57). The simulation therefore does not independently confirm the experimental claim; it merely reproduces an observable that was injected through an unmeasured parameter. To make the numerical agreement meaningful, the authors must characterize the actual coherent background in their setup (amplitude and phase), for example by measuring the VPP output and the lens transmission independently, and then test whether the predicted zero count is robust to the measured noise level and to perturbations in α and the background phase. Without such a measurement or a parameter sweep, the circularity concern stands.
  2. [Results/Figure 3 and Supplementary Note 2] The 'unambiguous identification' claim is not supported by quantitative validation. Figure 3 shows single representative images for each ℓ without error bars, repeated trials, or a defined criterion for counting intensity zeros. The tilt angle θ is varied from 9° to 18° depending on |ℓ|, which introduces a potential bias if the experimenter adjusts the angle based on the expected charge. The authors should report a blind or automated zero-counting procedure, statistics over multiple acquisitions, and a comparison with an independent technique (e.g., Mach-Zehnder interferometry) for at least a subset of charges. The current presentation is insufficient to establish reliability for unknown beams, which is the paper's central promise.
  3. [Supplementary Note 4, Eq. (5)] The lens is modeled as a binary amplitude Fresnel zone plate, U(x',y') = 1 − floor((x'^2+y'^2)/(λf) mod 2). However, the main text describes the device at the operating voltage of 3 V as a phase sinusoidal diffraction structure (Results: 'transformation of amplitude gratings into a phase sinusoidal diffraction structure'), and at 0 V as an amplitude grating. The equivalence between the binary amplitude mask used in the simulation and the actual twist-planar LC phase element is not demonstrated. Since the simulation is presented as being 'fully consistent' with the experiment, the authors need to justify the lens model (for example, by measuring the lens's actual transmission/phase profile or by showing that the far-field observable is insensitive to the lens description). Otherwise, the numerical support for the central claim is not established.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section heading] The heading 'Determinaton of the Phase Topology of a Singular Beam' contains a typo: 'Determinaton' should be 'Determination'.
  2. [Results, first paragraph] The phrase 'the Mogen condition [55] is disrupted' appears to be a typo for the 'Mauguin condition', consistent with Reference [55] (Mauguin, C.). Please correct this.
  3. [Supplementary Note 4, Eq. (2)] The notation in Eq. (2) is confusing: the radial coordinate ρ is used in Eq. (1) as a spatial variable, while here it is stated that the beam has 'radial number ρ=0', but the Laguerre polynomial has subscript p. The symbol should be the radial index p, and the text should clarify that p=0 for the fundamental radial mode.
  4. [Supplementary Note 4, text after Eq. (1)] The description of α² as 'signal intensity amplitude' is ambiguous. α is an amplitude coefficient, and α² is the signal intensity fraction; 1−α² is the background intensity fraction. This should be stated precisely.
  5. [Figure 3 caption] The caption states that θ increases from 9 to 18 degrees with increasing topological charge, but the reason for this choice is not explained. Since the tilt angle is part of the measurement protocol, the authors should justify or specify the rule used to select θ for each ℓ.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Theoretical support for the |ℓ|-zero readout is partly constructed: the simulation hand-sets the coherent background that causes the splitting, though the experimental demonstration is independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Supplementary Note 4, Eq. (1); Discussion]
    "E0(ρ, φ) = αELG(ρ, φ) + √(1 − α2)EG(ρ), (1) ... in simulations α is equal to 0.998 ... 1 − α2 – the amplitude of the noise intensity (in simulations equal to 0.4%). The results of numerical simulation ... are shown in the Figure S3. The simulation results are fully consistent with the experimental results (Figure 3)."

    The numerical 'demonstration' of |ℓ| isolated zeros is obtained by explicitly injecting a coherent Gaussian background into the input beam, with the amplitude α hand-set to 0.998 rather than measured from the VPP output or lens. No sweep over α or noise phase is reported. Since the fragmentation of a charge-ℓ vortex into |ℓ| unit-charge vortices under a weak perturbation is precisely the known effect being invoked (refs 33, 35, 57), the simulation's counting of zeros is contained in its input: an LG beam of charge ℓ plus a perturbation chosen to produce that instability. Calling this agreement a theoretical confirmation of the central charge-readout claim is therefore partially circular, even though the experimental images in Figures 3–6 provide independent evidence.

full rationale

The paper's central experimental method—counting isolated intensity zeros in the Fourier plane to obtain |ℓ| and using the ±45° tilt orientation for the sign—is supported by real CCD images for charges ±1 to ±8, and the sign convention follows the externally established astigmatic transformation of ref. 37. The instability of high-order vortices is also attributed to external literature (refs 33, 35, 57), not to a self-citation chain, so the non-circular parts of the evidence are substantial. However, the claimed theoretical validation is weakened by a genuine reduction: the numerical model in Supplementary Note 4 imposes a 0.4% coherent Gaussian background as a free parameter, and the resulting |ℓ|-fold splitting is a known topological consequence of that perturbation. Thus the simulation's outcome is not an independent prediction of the effect; it is an illustration that assumes the very noise mechanism on which the magnitude readout depends. The paper does not characterize the actual background amplitude or phase in the experiment, nor does it show robustness over that parameter, so the 'unambiguous' determination of |ℓ| is not fully established by the theory. This is a partial circularity, but not a complete one: the experimental data and the external instability literature give the claim independent content, which keeps the score below 8.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a known instability (vortex splitting under background noise), a simplified binary mask model of the LC lens, and two unstated or hand-set simulation parameters. No new physical entities are introduced. The main epistemic contribution is an engineering demonstration rather than a new law or mechanism.

free parameters (2)
  • alpha (signal amplitude fraction α) = 0.998
    Eq. (1) of Supplementary Note 4 controls the amplitude of the coherent Gaussian background injected to induce vortex splitting. No independent measurement or derivation is given; it is effectively chosen to reproduce the observed fragmentation.
  • w0 and wG (signal and noise beam waists) = not stated
    Eqs. (2) and (3) require the Laguerre-Gaussian signal waist and Gaussian noise waist, but their values are not provided. The simulated intensity patterns depend on these inputs.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption High-order optical vortices with |ℓ|>1 are unstable in the presence of coherent background fields and split into |ℓ| unit-charge vortices.
    The method relies on this known instability, cited from refs. [33,35,57], to produce the countable intensity zeros.
  • ad hoc to paper The binary Fresnel zone plate mask U(x',y') = 1 - floor((x'^2+y'^2)/(λf) mod 2) adequately represents the electrically controlled twist-planar liquid crystal Fresnel lens.
    Supplementary Note 4, Eq. (5). This model ignores twist orientation, polarization effects, voltage-dependent phase profile, and the measured 30% diffraction efficiency, yet it is used to simulate the lens behavior.
  • standard math The focal plane intensity distribution of a lens is the Fourier transform of the input field and thus represents the far-field distribution.
    Used throughout to justify measuring vortex splitting in the Fourier plane rather than in the propagating far field.
  • domain assumption Each observed dark spot in the focal plane corresponds to an isolated phase singularity with unit topological charge.
    The paper counts intensity zeros as individual vortices, assuming a one-to-one correspondence without aberration or resolution analysis.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Phase Topology Stability of an Optical Vortex via an Electrically Controlled Twist-Planar Oriented Liquid Crystal Fresnel Lens." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AXBSWP6O

@misc{pith2026250602632,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Phase Topology Stability of an Optical Vortex via an Electrically Controlled Twist-Planar Oriented Liquid Crystal Fresnel Lens},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AXBSWP6O}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.02632}
}
read the original abstract

Optical vortices (OVs) have emerged as a revolutionary concept in modern photonics, offering a unique method of manipulating light beyond conventional Gaussian beams. Despite their vast potential, phase topology stability remains unaddressed, limiting their widespread adoption and performance in real-world environments. Here, we reveal the missing link to assessing the stability of optical vortices using an electrically tunable twist-planar liquid crystal (LC) Fresnel lens. The proposed LC-based lens leverages the birefringence and voltage-controlled reconfigurability of liquid crystals to dynamically probe the phase topology of singular beams. By modulating the LC orientation with an applied voltage, we restructure the optical phase in real-time without requiring modifications to the optical setup. The 3V and 35V voltage supply allows for the switch between the "topological charge detection" and "optical singular beam propagation" modes. This eliminates the need for additional optical elements, significantly simplifying the detection and characterization of vortex beams. Experimental and theoretical investigations demonstrate that the vortex topology can be unambiguously identified from the intensity profile observed in the Fourier plane of a lens. Furthermore, the designed device features low power consumption, compact form factor, and seamless integration potential, making it a promising candidate for scalable vortex-based photonic systems.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [37]

    Physics letters a 377(15), 1154–1156 (2013)

    Vaity, P., Banerji, J., Singh, R.: Measuring the topolo gical charge of an optical vortex by using a tilted convex lens. Physics letters a 377(15), 1154–1156 (2013)

  2. [72]

    Laser & Photonics Reviews, 2401006 (2024)

    Melnikova, E., Pantsialeyeva, Y., Gorbach, D., Tolsti k, A., Karabchevsky, A.: 17 Tunable liquid crystal twisted-planar fresnel lens for vor tex topology determina- tion. Laser & Photonics Reviews, 2401006 (2024)

  3. [1]

    Opt ics express 25(10), 11265–11274 (2017)

    Padgett, M.J.: Orbital angular momentum 25 years on. Opt ics express 25(10), 11265–11274 (2017)

  4. [2]

    Light: Science & Applications 8(1), 90 (2019)

    Shen, Y., Wang, X., Xie, Z., Min, C., Fu, X., Liu, Q., Gong, M., Yuan, X.: Opti- cal vortices 30 years on: Oam manipulation from topological charge to multiple singularities. Light: Science & Applications 8(1), 90 (2019)

  5. [3]

    Nature Photonics, 1–8 (2025)

    Huang, J., Mao, J., Li, X., Yuan, J., Zheng, Y., Zhai, C., D ai, T., Fu, Z., Bao, J., Yang, Y., et al.: Integrated optical entangled quantum vort ex emitters. Nature Photonics, 1–8 (2025)

  6. [4]

    Nature Photonics, 1–6 (2025)

    Session, D., Jalali Mehrabad, M., Paithankar, N., Grass , T., Eckhardt, C.J., Cao, B., Gustavo Suárez Forero, D., Li, K., Alam, M.S., Watanabe, K., et al.: Optical pumping of electronic quantum hall states with vortex light . Nature Photonics, 1–6 (2025)

  7. [5]

    Nature Photonics, 1–8 (2025)

    Hu, Z., Bongiovanni, D., Wang, Z., Wang, X., Song, D., Xu, J., Morandotti, R., Buljan, H., Chen, Z.: Topological orbital angular momen tum extraction and twofold protection of vortex transport. Nature Photonics, 1–8 (2025)

  8. [6]

    Nature Photo nics, 1–8 (2025)

    Hu, J., Eriksson, M., Gigan, S., Fickler, R.: Generalize d angle–orbital angular momentum talbot effect and modulo mode sorting. Nature Photo nics, 1–8 (2025)

Show all 73 references
  1. [7]

    : Integrated optical vortex microcomb

    Chen, B., Zhou, Y., Liu, Y., Ye, C., Cao, Q., Huang, P., Kim , C., Zheng, Y., Oxenløwe, L.K., Yvind, K., et al. : Integrated optical vortex microcomb. Nature Photonics 18(6), 625–631 (2024)

  2. [8]

    New Journal of Physics 16(11), 113028 (2014) 12

    Krenn, M., Fickler, R., Fink, M., Handsteiner, J., Malik , M., Scheidl, T., Ursin, R., Zeilinger, A.: Communication with spatially mod ulated light through turbulent air across vienna. New Journal of Physics 16(11), 113028 (2014) 12

  3. [9]

    Nature photonics 7(5), 354–362 (2013)

    Richardson, D.J., Fini, J.M., Nelson, L.E.: Space-divi sion multiplexing in optical fibres. Nature photonics 7(5), 354–362 (2013)

  4. [10]

    : Optical communications using orbital angular momentum beams

    Willner, A.E., Huang, H., Yan, Y., Ren, Y., Ahmed, N., Xi e, G., Bao, C., Li, L., Cao, Y., Zhao, Z., et al. : Optical communications using orbital angular momentum beams. Advances in optics and photonics 7(1), 66–106 (2015)

  5. [11]

    Advances in Physics: X 6(1), 1838322 (2021)

    Bruce, G.D., Rodríguez-Sevilla, P., Dholakia, K.: Ini tiating revolutions for optical manipulation: the origins and applications of rotational d ynamics of trapped particles. Advances in Physics: X 6(1), 1838322 (2021)

  6. [12]

    Physical r eview letters 118(20), 203902 (2017)

    Aleksanyan, A., Kravets, N., Brasselet, E.: Multiple- star system adaptive vortex coronagraphy using a liquid crystal light valve. Physical r eview letters 118(20), 203902 (2017)

  7. [13]

    Optics Letters 43(3), 383–386 (2018)

    Aleksanyan, A., Brasselet, E.: High-charge and multip le-star vortex coronagraphy from stacked vector vortex phase masks. Optics Letters 43(3), 383–386 (2018)

  8. [14]

    Optics letters 30(24), 3308–3310 (2005)

    Foo, G., Palacios, D.M., Swartzlander Jr, G.A.: Optica l vortex coronagraph. Optics letters 30(24), 3308–3310 (2005)

  9. [15]

    Nature 464(7291), 1018–1020 (2010)

    Serabyn, E., Mawet, D., Burruss, R.: An image of an exopl anet separated by two diffraction beamwidths from a star. Nature 464(7291), 1018–1020 (2010)

  10. [16]

    Optics Express 25(11), 12499–12507 (2017)

    Masuda, K., Nakano, S., Barada, D., Kumakura, M., Miyam oto, K., Omatsu, T.: Azo-polymer film twisted to form a helical surface relief by i llumination with a circularly polarized gaussian beam. Optics Express 25(11), 12499–12507 (2017)

  11. [17]

    Scientific reports 6(1), 21738 (2016)

    Takahashi, F., Miyamoto, K., Hidai, H., Yamane, K., Mor ita, R., Omatsu, T.: Picosecond optical vortex pulse illumination forms a monoc rystalline silicon needle. Scientific reports 6(1), 21738 (2016)

  12. [18]

    Scientific reports 4(1), 4579 (2014)

    Otsu, T., Ando, T., Takiguchi, Y., Ohtake, Y., Toyoda, H ., Itoh, H.: Direct evi- dence for three-dimensional off-axis trapping with single l aguerre-gaussian beam. Scientific reports 4(1), 4579 (2014)

  13. [19]

    Applied Physics Letters 97(24) (2010)

    Tan, P., Yuan, X.-C., Yuan, G., Wang, Q.: High-resoluti on wide-field standing- wave surface plasmon resonance fluorescence microscopy wit h optical vortices. Applied Physics Letters 97(24) (2010)

  14. [20]

    Applied Physics Letters 108(20) (2016)

    Zhang, C., Min, C., Du, L., Yuan, X.-C.: Perfect optical vortex enhanced surface plasmon excitation for plasmonic structured illumination microscopy imaging. Applied Physics Letters 108(20) (2016)

  15. [21]

    Pr oceedings of the Royal Society of London

    Nye, J.F., Berry, M.V.: Dislocations in wave trains. Pr oceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 336(1605), 165–190 (1974) 13

  16. [22]

    Op tics communications 112(5-6), 321–327 (1994)

    Beijersbergen, M., Coerwinkel, R., Kristensen, M., Wo erdman, J.: Helical- wavefront laser beams produced with a spiral phaseplate. Op tics communications 112(5-6), 321–327 (1994)

  17. [23]

    Optics express 12(15), 3548–3553 (2004)

    Sueda, K., Miyaji, G., Miyanaga, N., Nakatsuka, M.: Lag uerre-gaussian beam generated with a multilevel spiral phase plate for high inte nsity laser pulses. Optics express 12(15), 3548–3553 (2004)

  18. [24]

    Journal of Nan ophotonics 7(1), 078598– 078598 (2013)

    Marrucci, L.: The q-plate and its future. Journal of Nan ophotonics 7(1), 078598– 078598 (2013)

  19. [25]

    Y., Kukhta, I., Chepeleva, D., Murauski, A.A., Muravsky, A.A.: Achromatic switchable liquid-crystal twist- q-plate

    Melnikova, E., Tolstik, A., Gorbach, D., Stanevich, V. Y., Kukhta, I., Chepeleva, D., Murauski, A.A., Muravsky, A.A.: Achromatic switchable liquid-crystal twist- q-plate. Journal of Applied Spectroscopy 90(2), 427–435 (2023)

  20. [26]

    q-plates

    Marrucci, L., Karimi, E., Slussarenko, S., Piccirillo , B., Santamato, E., Nagali, E., Sciarrino, F.: Spin-to-orbital optical angular moment um conversion in liquid crystal “q-plates”: Classical and quantum applications. M olecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals 561(1), 48–56 (2012)

  21. [27]

    Molecular Crystal s and Liquid Crystals 646(1), 116–124 (2017)

    Kobashi, J., Yoshida, H., Ozaki, M.: Broadband optical vortex generation from patterned cholesteric liquid crystals. Molecular Crystal s and Liquid Crystals 646(1), 116–124 (2017)

  22. [28]

    : Generation of the “perfect” optical vortex using a liquid-crystal spatial light modula tor

    Ostrovsky, A.S., Rickenstorff-Parrao, C., Arrizón, V. : Generation of the “perfect” optical vortex using a liquid-crystal spatial light modula tor. Optics letters 38(4), 534–536 (2013)

  23. [29]

    Optics express 21(25), 30196–30203 (2013)

    Mirhosseini, M., Magana-Loaiza, O.S., Chen, C., Roden burg, B., Malik, M., Boyd, R.W.: Rapid generation of light beams carrying orbita l angular momen- tum. Optics express 21(25), 30196–30203 (2013)

  24. [30]

    Nature P hotonics 18(3), 286– 293 (2024)

    Hwang, M.-S., Kim, H.-R., Kim, J., Yang, B.-J., Kivshar , Y., Park, H.-G.: Vortex nanolaser based on a photonic disclination cavity. Nature P hotonics 18(3), 286– 293 (2024)

  25. [31]

    Jetp Lett 52(8), 429–431 (1990)

    Bazhenov, V.Y., Vasnetsov, M., Soskin, M.: Laser beams with screw dislocations in their wavefronts. Jetp Lett 52(8), 429–431 (1990)

  26. [32]

    Optics le tters 17(3), 221–223 (1992)

    Heckenberg, N., McDuff, R., Smith, C., White, A.: Genera tion of optical phase singularities by computer-generated holograms. Optics le tters 17(3), 221–223 (1992)

  27. [33]

    Optics communications 103(5-6), 422–428 (1993) 14

    Basistiy, I., Bazhenov, V.Y., Soskin, M., Vasnetsov, M .V.: Optics of light beams with screw dislocations. Optics communications 103(5-6), 422–428 (1993) 14

  28. [34]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    Berry, M.V., Dennis, M.R.: Knotted and linked phase sin gularities in monochro- matic waves. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Ser ies A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 457(2013), 2251–2263 (2001)

  29. [35]

    Optics expr ess 20(20), 22961–22975 (2012)

    Ricci, F., Löffler, W., Van Exter, M.: Instability of high er-order optical vortices analyzed with a multi-pinhole interferometer. Optics expr ess 20(20), 22961–22975 (2012)

  30. [36]

    Optics Communications 83(1-2), 123–135 (1991)

    Abramochkin, E., Volostnikov, V.: Beam transformatio ns and nontransformed beams. Optics Communications 83(1-2), 123–135 (1991)

  31. [38]

    Optics express 17(26), 23374–23379 (2009)

    Denisenko, V., Shvedov, V., Desyatnikov, A.S., Neshev , D.N., Krolikowski, W., Volyar, A., Soskin, M., Kivshar, Y.S.: Determination of top ological charges of polychromatic optical vortices. Optics express 17(26), 23374–23379 (2009)

  32. [39]

    Advances in optics and photo nics 8(2), 200–227 (2016)

    Forbes, A., Dudley, A., McLaren, M.: Creation and detec tion of optical modes with spatial light modulators. Advances in optics and photo nics 8(2), 200–227 (2016)

  33. [40]

    Journal of modern opti cs 45(7), 1495–1506 (1998)

    Kotlyar, V., Khonina, S., Soifer, V.: Light field decomp osition in angular har- monics by means of diffractive optics. Journal of modern opti cs 45(7), 1495–1506 (1998)

  34. [41]

    Optics le tters 40(4), 562–565 (2015)

    Dai, K., Gao, C., Zhong, L., Na, Q., Wang, Q.: Measuring o am states of light beams with gradually-changing-period gratings. Optics le tters 40(4), 562–565 (2015)

  35. [42]

    Applied Physi cs Letters 94(23) (2009)

    Guo, C.-S., Yue, S.-J., Wei, G.-X.: Measuring the orbit al angular momentum of optical vortices using a multipinhole plate. Applied Physi cs Letters 94(23) (2009)

  36. [43]

    Journal of the Optical Society of America B 29(8), 1968–1976 (2012)

    Anderson, M.E., Bigman, H., Araujo, L.E., Chaloupka, J .L.: Measuring the topo- logical charge of ultrabroadband, optical-vortex beams wi th a triangular aperture. Journal of the Optical Society of America B 29(8), 1968–1976 (2012)

  37. [44]

    Phys ical review letters 88(25), 257901 (2002)

    Leach, J., Padgett, M.J., Barnett, S.M., Franke-Arnol d, S., Courtial, J.: Mea- suring the orbital angular momentum of a single photon. Phys ical review letters 88(25), 257901 (2002)

  38. [45]

    Optik 117(9), 423–425 (2006)

    Frączek, E., Frączek, W., Masajada, J.: The new method o f topological charge determination of optical vortices in the interference field of the optical vortex interferometer. Optik 117(9), 423–425 (2006)

  39. [46]

    Journal of Applied 15 Spectroscopy 83, 115–120 (2016)

    Mikulich, V., Murawski, A.A., Muravsky, A.A., Agabeko v, V.: Influence of methyl substituents on azo-dye photoalignment in thin films . Journal of Applied 15 Spectroscopy 83, 115–120 (2016)

  40. [47]

    Applied Optics 59(17), 5102–5107 (2020)

    Muravsky, A., Murauski, A., Kukhta, I.: Photoinduced h ole dipoles’ mechanism of liquid crystal photoalignment. Applied Optics 59(17), 5102–5107 (2020)

  41. [48]

    Journal of Optical Technology 77(7), 461–462 (2010)

    Kazak, A., Tolstik, A., Mel’nikova, E.: Controlling li ght fields by means of liquid- crystal diffraction elements. Journal of Optical Technology 77(7), 461–462 (2010)

  42. [49]

    Crystals 10(4), 323 (2020)

    Chigrinov, V., Sun, J., Wang, X.: Photoaligning and pho topatterning: New lc technology. Crystals 10(4), 323 (2020)

  43. [50]

    Optics Letters 38(11), 1775–1777 (2013)

    Wang, X.-Q., Srivastava, A.K., Chigrinov, V.G., Kwok, H.-S.: Switchable fres- nel lens based on micropatterned alignment. Optics Letters 38(11), 1775–1777 (2013)

  44. [51]

    raction structure

    Melnikova, E., Stashkevich, I., Rushnova, I., Tolstik , A., Timofeev, S.: Polariza- tion properties of the electrically controlled twist-plan ar liquid crystal di. raction structure. Nonlinear Phenomena in Complex Systems 25(3), 229–244 (2022)

  45. [52]

    Optics Communications 400, 144–149 (2017)

    Węgłowski, R., Kozanecka-Szmigiel, A., Piecek, W., Kon ieczkowska, J., Schab- Balcerzak, E.: Electro-optically tunable diffraction grat ing with photoaligned liquid crystals. Optics Communications 400, 144–149 (2017)

  46. [53]

    Liquid Crystalline Polymers: Volume 2–Processing and Applications, 265–295 (2015)

    Zhou, H., Choate, E.P., Wang, H.: Optical fredericks tr ansition in a nematic liquid crystal layer. Liquid Crystalline Polymers: Volume 2–Processing and Applications, 265–295 (2015)

  47. [54]

    Journal of Applied Physics 115(20) (2014)

    Lucchetti, L., Catani, L., Simoni, F.: Light-controll ed electric freedericksz thresh- old in dye doped liquid crystals. Journal of Applied Physics 115(20) (2014)

  48. [55]

    Mauguin, C.: Sur les cristaux liquides de m. lehmann. Bu lletin de Minéralogie 34(3), 71–117 (1911)

  49. [56]

    Journal of Applied Spectroscopy, 1–6 (2024)

    Mel’nikova, E., Panteleeva, E., Gorbach, D., Tolstik, A., Rushnova, I., Kabanova, O.: Electrically controlled liquid crystal twist-planar f resnel lens. Journal of Applied Spectroscopy, 1–6 (2024)

  50. [57]

    Physical Review A 56(5), 4064 (1997)

    Soskin, M., Gorshkov, V., Vasnetsov, M., Malos, J., Hec kenberg, N.: Topological charge and angular momentum of light beams carrying optical vortices. Physical Review A 56(5), 4064 (1997)

  51. [58]

    Optical Engineering 52(9), 091721–091721 (2013)

    Ma, H., Hu, H., Xie, W., Xu, X.: Study on the generation of a vortex laser beam by using phase-only liquid crystal spatial light modulator . Optical Engineering 52(9), 091721–091721 (2013)

  52. [59]

    Optics Communications 463, 125341 (2020) 16

    Szatkowski, M., Masajada, J., Augustyniak, I., Nowack a, K.: Generation of com- posite vortex beams by independent spatial light modulator pixel addressing. Optics Communications 463, 125341 (2020) 16

  53. [60]

    Op tics express 17(14), 11926–11934 (2009)

    Nersisyan, S., Tabiryan, N., Steeves, D.M., Kimball, B .R.: Fabrication of liquid crystal polymer axial waveplates for uv-ir wavelengths. Op tics express 17(14), 11926–11934 (2009)

  54. [61]

    Optics express 19(5), 4085–4090 (2011)

    Slussarenko, S., Murauski, A., Du, T., Chigrinov, V., M arrucci, L., Santamato, E.: Tunable liquid crystal q-plates with arbitrary topologica l charge. Optics express 19(5), 4085–4090 (2011)

  55. [62]

    Physical review letters 80(15), 3217 (1998)

    Courtial, J., Dholakia, K., Robertson, D., Allen, L., P adgett, M.: Measurement of the rotational frequency shift imparted to a rotating lig ht beam possessing orbital angular momentum. Physical review letters 80(15), 3217 (1998)

  56. [63]

    Physical Review A 49(4), 3119 (1994)

    Harris, M., Hill, C., Tapster, P., Vaughan, J.: Laser mo des with helical wave fronts. Physical Review A 49(4), 3119 (1994)

  57. [64]

    Optics express 27(9), 12774–12779 (2019)

    Cui, S., Xu, B., Luo, S., Xu, H., Cai, Z., Luo, Z., Pu, J., C hávez-Cerda, S.: Deter- mining topological charge based on an improved fizeau interf erometer. Optics express 27(9), 12774–12779 (2019)

  58. [65]

    Scientific Reports 8(1), 6370 (2018)

    Melo, L.A., Jesus-Silva, A.J., Chávez-Cerda, S., Ribe iro, P.H.S., Soares, W.C.: Direct measurement of the topological charge in elliptical beams using diffraction by a triangular aperture. Scientific Reports 8(1), 6370 (2018)

  59. [66]

    Optics letters 36(11), 2017–2019 (2011)

    Han, Y., Zhao, G.: Measuring the topological charge of o ptical vortices with an axicon. Optics letters 36(11), 2017–2019 (2011)

  60. [67]

    Optics Letters 37(5), 767–769 (2012)

    Izdebskaya, Y.V., Rebling, J., Desyatnikov, A.S., Kiv shar, Y.S.: Observation of vector solitons with hidden vorticity. Optics Letters 37(5), 767–769 (2012)

  61. [68]

    Optics express 19(21), 20616–20621 (2011)

    Mesquita, P.H., Jesus-Silva, A.J., Fonseca, E.J., Hic kmann, J.M.: Engineering a square truncated lattice with light’s orbital angular mome ntum. Optics express 19(21), 20616–20621 (2011)

  62. [69]

    Journal of the Society for Information Display 29(11), 833–839 (2021)

    Muravsky, A.A., Murauski, A.A., Kukhta, I.N., Yakovle va, A.S.: High anchoring photoalignment material based on new photo-induced hole di poles’ mechanism. Journal of the Society for Information Display 29(11), 833–839 (2021)

  63. [70]

    Optics Co mmunications 522, 128661 (2022)

    Melnikova, E., Gorbach, D., Slussarenko Sr, S., Muravs ky, A., Tolstik, A., Slus- sarenko Jr, S.: Liquid-crystal q-plates with a phase core to generation vortex beams with controllable number of singularities. Optics Co mmunications 522, 128661 (2022)

  64. [71]

    Journal of Optica l Technology 89(3), 169–175 (2022)

    Melnikova, E.A.: Electrically controlled microstruc tured liquid-crystal twist ele- ments for phase conversion of light fields. Journal of Optica l Technology 89(3), 169–175 (2022)

  65. [73]

    photoinduced hole dipoles

    Plick, W.N., Krenn, M.: Physical meaning of the radial i ndex of laguerre-gauss beams. Physical Review A 92(6), 063841 (2015) Supplementary Information 1 Fabrication of the Electrically Controlled Twist-Planar Oriented Liquid Crystal Fresnel Lens The method of manufacturing th...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.