Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 75 references

Multi-wavelength analysis of FSRQ B2 1348+30B: Constraints on the jet power

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A 14.5-year multi-wavelength study of quasar B2 1348+30B places its jet kinetic power between $2.57\times10^{46}$ and $4.17\times10^{48}$ erg/s, at or above Eddington.

desk verdict Useful multi-wavelength dataset for an under-modeled FSRQ, but the jet-power claim rests on a hard X-ray tail that the paper's own F-test does not support. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.02821 v1 pith:DUXJDRFQ submitted 2025-06-03 astro-ph.HE

Sajad Ahanger , Sunder Sahayanathan , Sitha K. Jagan , Shah Zahir , Naseer Iqbal This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords activegalacticnucleiblazarsflat-spectrumradioquasarsB21348+30Bjetkineticpowerminimumelectronenergysynchrotronself-Comptonbroadbandspectraldistribution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the broadband spectral energy distribution of the flat-spectrum radio quasar B2 1348+30B, measured over 14.5 years in gamma rays, X-rays, and ultraviolet/optical light, can be reproduced by a single-zone leptonic jet model across one quiescent and two flaring states. Its key observational handle is the quiescent-state X-ray spectrum, which appears as an extremely hard broken power law; the paper interprets the hard high-energy index as the low-energy cutoff of the radiating electron distribution at $\gamma_{\min}=4$. That single number, fed into the fitted jet parameters, converts into a kinetic-power bracket: $2.57\times10^{46}$ erg/s if the jet is made of electron-positron pairs and $4.17\times10^{48}$ erg/s if it is an electron-proton plasma. Because the lower limit already exceeds the Eddington luminosity derived from the black-hole mass, the result speaks to whether blazar jets are powered by accretion alone or by black-hole spin extraction. A sympathetic reader would care because it turns an otherwise ordinary FSRQ lightcurve into a lever on one of the central open questions of AGN physics, the jet energy budget.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is a one-zone leptonic emission model: a spherical blob with a broken power-law electron distribution $N(\gamma)\propto \gamma^{-p}$ below a break energy $\gamma_b$ and $\gamma^{-q}$ above it, radiating through synchrotron, synchrotron self-Compton, and external Compton scattering of a 1000 K blackbody photon field. The crucial identity is the relation $\gamma_{\min} = ((1+z)/(\delta\Gamma) \cdot \nu_{\min}/\bar{\nu})^{1/2}$, which turns the lowest observed external-Compton photon frequency ($\nu_{\min}\simeq 2.26\times10^{17}$ Hz in the quiescent state) into the minimum electron Lorentz factor, giving $\gamma_{\min}\simeq 4$. The jet-power formulas then multiply the electron (and cold-proton) energy density by $\pi R^2 \Gamma^2 c$, with equipartition between magnetic field and electron energy densities and a $3^\circ$ viewing angle imposed during the spectral fits.

What would settle it

A deeper X-ray observation of B2 1348+30B at quiescent flux could settle the claim: if the 0.3-10 keV spectrum prefers a single power law over a broken power law, or prefers a high-energy index softer than about 0.8, then the low-energy-cutoff interpretation and the derived $\gamma_{\min}=4$ and jet-power limits fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a simple one-zone leptonic model with synchrotron, synchrotron self-Compton, and external Compton emission describes the SEDs of all three flux states, and that the quiescent state's hard X-ray tail is the spectral signature of a low-energy cutoff at $\gamma_{\min}=4$, not a shock-accelerated particle population. From this cutoff and the fitted parameters, the jet kinetic power is found to lie between $2.57\times10^{46}$ erg/s for an electron-positron (light) jet and $4.17\times10^{48}$ erg/s for an electron-proton (heavy) jet; these are lower and upper limits on the true power. The light-jet limit is already larger than the Eddington luminosity $2.34\times10^{46}$ erg/s of the source's $1.8\times10^{8}$ solar-mass black hole, so the paper concludes the jet cannot be powered by accretion luminosity alone and may draw energy from the black hole's spin.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the quiescent X-ray spectrum is genuinely a broken power law with an extremely hard high-energy index near 0.8; the paper's own F-test (p = 0.30 and 0.27) says a single power law is statistically adequate, and without the hard tail the $\gamma_{\min}=4$ constraint and the jet-power bracket do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the model is correct, the jet of B2 1348+30B carries at least $2.57\times10^{46}$ erg/s even in the pure electron-positron case, so it is more powerful than the Eddington luminosity of its black hole.
  • If the jet contains one cold proton per radiating electron, its power rises to $4.17\times10^{48}$ erg/s, about 180 times Eddington, which would require a substantial energy source beyond accretion.
  • The near-doubling of the bulk Lorentz factor between the quiescent and flaring states indicates that flares correspond to faster ejecta, consistent with shock-dominated flaring rather than a change in magnetic dissipation alone.
  • The $\le3$-day variability timescale, together with the light-travel-time argument, locates the emission region within about $3.7\times10^{16}$ cm of the black hole for a Doppler factor of about 20, tying the energy budget to the launch region.
  • The hard X-ray tail in quiescence, if real, provides a model-independent handle on the lowest electron energy, which is the dominant uncertainty in any leptonic jet-power estimate.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same low-energy-cutoff reading could be applied to other FSRQs caught in quiescent X-ray states, turning a population of hard X-ray tails into a survey of jet particle budgets.
  • Editorial inference: because the F-test in the paper leaves the simpler power-law model statistically acceptable, the quickest external check is a deeper X-ray observation of the quiescent state; if the hard tail disappears, the $\gamma_{\min}=4$ constraint and both power limits would have to be revised.
  • Editorial inference: the power bracket assumes a single-zone, equipartition jet; if multi-zone or non-equipartition models fit the same SED, the derived $\gamma_{\min}$ and power values would shift, so the bracket is best read as model-dependent rather than as an intrinsic property of the source.
  • Editorial inference: the lower limit just above Eddington makes this source a candidate for direct black-hole spin measurements, for example through reflection spectroscopy or jet-launch modeling, providing a test of the spin-extraction scenario the paper invokes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents a multi-wavelength analysis of the FSRQ B2 1348+30B using 14.5 years of Fermi-LAT, Swift-XRT, and Swift-UVOT data. The authors identify two flaring states and one quiescent state, perform temporal and spectral analyses, and model the broadband SEDs with a one-zone leptonic synchrotron + SSC + EC model. The central claim is that the quiescent state S2 requires a broken power-law X-ray spectrum with a very hard high-energy index (Γ2 ≈ 0.84), which is interpreted as evidence for a low-energy cutoff in the electron distribution; this yields γ_min = 4 and, combined with the SED fit parameters, gives jet kinetic power limits of 2.57×10^46 erg/s for a light (e±) jet and 4.17×10^48 erg/s for a heavy (e−p) jet, which are compared to the Eddington luminosity of the black hole.

Significance. If the jet-power constraints were robust, they would be astrophysically interesting, as they would suggest a jet power near or above the Eddington luminosity and possibly support black hole spin as an energy source. However, the central claim is undermined by the paper's own statistical analysis: the F-test in Table 2 finds p = 0.30 and p = 0.27 for the S2 X-ray spectrum, indicating that a single power-law is sufficient and that the broken power-law is not statistically required. The broadband SED fits also have large χ² values (Table 5), calling into question the statement that the model 'successfully reproduces' the data. The temporal analysis (Bayesian blocks, variability timescale, fractional variability) and the γ-ray spectral results are useful and appear sound, but the main jet-power result is not supported by the evidence presented.

major comments (5)
  1. [§3.2/Table 2 vs. Abstract and §4] The abstract and the summary bullet list state that a broken power-law 'was required' to model the low flux state S2, but Section 3.2 and Table 2 contradict this. Table 2 reports F-test p-values of 0.30 (PL vs. LP) and 0.27 (PL vs. BPL) for S2, and the text explicitly says 'the resulting p-values were > 0.05 supporting power-law as the best fit model across all the three states.' Since the γ_min = 4 constraint in Section 3.4 and both jet-power limits in Table 5 derive entirely from the claimed hard high-energy index of the S2 broken power-law, this internal inconsistency is load-bearing. The manuscript must either provide a statistically valid justification for preferring the broken power-law (e.g., a proper test that accounts for the undefined break energy under the null hypothesis) or retract the jet-power constraints.
  2. [§3.4, Eq. (7), and Figure 6] The γ_min = 4 constraint is obtained from the same broadband SED fit that determines the other model parameters; it is not an independent measurement but a by-product of the model assumptions (one-zone geometry, equipartition, EC/IR blackbody at 1000 K, etc.). Moreover, the jet-power values in Table 5 (P_jet,light = 2.57×10^46 erg/s, P_jet,heavy = 4.17×10^48 erg/s) are quoted without any error propagation. Figure 6 shows confidence intervals on γ_min only, not on the resulting P_jet values. The paper should propagate the uncertainties or explicitly state that these are point estimates with unquantified systematic errors.
  3. [§3.2, Table 1] The state S2 X-ray spectrum is co-added from seven Swift-XRT observations spanning 2020-10-06 to 2021-01-21 (obs IDs 00013619001–00013619006 and 00046508002). The paper does not test for spectral variability within this period. If the source varied in flux or spectral shape during these months, the co-added spectrum could produce a spurious hard tail. The robustness of the broken power-law fit to binning and to the exclusion of individual observations should be demonstrated before using its high-energy index to constrain γ_min.
  4. [§3.3, Table 5] The broadband SED fits have large reduced chi-squared values: 53.42/6 = 8.9 for S1, 36.31/10 = 3.6 for S2, and 46.48/11 = 4.2 for S3. Even after excluding the optical/UV data, the authors report χ²/dof values of 11/4 = 2.75, 19/6 = 3.17, and 18/7 = 2.57, which still exceed 2. The statement that the one-zone model can 'successfully reproduce' the broadband SED is therefore not supported by the fit statistics, and the reliability of the best-fit parameters used for the jet-power estimates is questionable.
  5. [§3.3, Table 5] The paper claims a 'significant increase in the bulk Lorentz factor during the flaring states' based on Γ = 32.94 (S1), 15.02 (S2), and 28.92 (S3) in Table 5. However, the text states that confidence intervals were obtained only for p, q, γ_min, and B, while the remaining parameters (including Γ) were frozen to their best-fit values. No uncertainties are given for Γ, so the significance of the factor-of-two increase is not established. Please provide at least a rough estimate of the Γ uncertainty or soften the claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and §3.2] The abstract states 'maximum photon energy < 20 GeV', but Section 3.2 reports that no photons above ~20 GeV were detected with >3σ significance. This is an upper limit or detection threshold, not a measured maximum; the wording should be more precise.
  2. [Table 2] The column headers in Table 2 are difficult to parse: the columns labeled 'PL, LP , BPL' and 'LP , BPL' combine too much information. A clearer layout showing χ²_red, F, and p for each model comparison would improve readability.
  3. [§3.4, Eq. (11)] The condition for neglecting U_e in the heavy-jet power is written as 'γ_min ≪ m_p∕m_2', which appears to be a typo; it should likely be m_p/(2 m_e) or similar. Please correct.
  4. [§3.3, Eq. (6)] The notation for the broken power-law electron distribution uses p for the low-energy index and q for the high-energy index, which is the reverse of the convention used in many blazar papers. Please clarify this explicitly to avoid confusion.
  5. [Figure 6] In the right panel, the y-axis label 'Pjet' appears twice, and the confidence intervals on γ_min from the left panel are not propagated to the P_jet curves. Showing the resulting uncertainty bands on P_jet would directly support the paper's error claims.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity in the derivations: the jet-power limits are explicitly computed from the same best-fit SED parameters, and the model code is reproduced standard work; the abstract's claim that a broken power-law was 'required' conflicts with the paper's own F-test, but that is a statistical correctness risk, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain: Fermi/Swift data -> spectral fits (Tables 2 and 4) -> one-zone leptonic SED fit (Table 5) -> Eq. 7 for gamma_min -> Eqs. 8-11 for Pjet. Each step is a standard inference: gamma_min is estimated by minimizing chi2 of the SED fit (Sec. 3.4, Fig. 6) rather than assumed, and Pjet,light/heavy are then computed algebraically from the fitted parameters. The paper does not call the resulting jet power a prediction or an independent measurement; it is presented as a model-dependent limit. The model code and Eq. 7 are cited to Sahayanathan et al. 2018 (same group), but that work is code-reproduced and the formula is standard inverse-Compton kinematics, so the self-citation is legitimate evidence, not a circular import. The principal weakness is statistical, not circular: the abstract and summary say the S2 broken power-law 'was required', while Sec. 3.2 reports F-test p=0.30 and p=0.27, i.e., the simpler power-law is adequate. If the hard X-ray tail is not real, the gamma_min=4 constraint and the quoted Pjet limits lose their observational basis. That is an overclaim/robustness problem; it does not make the derivation equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The jet power estimates depend on a large set of fitted parameters (gamma_min, p, q, gamma_b, gamma_max, B, Gamma) and assumed inputs (viewing angle, emission region size, seed photon temperature, equipartition). The gamma_min constraint, which is key to the jet power, is based on a broken power-law X-ray fit that the paper's own F-test does not favor. No new physical entities are introduced; all components are standard blazar model ingredients.

free parameters (9)
  • gamma_min = 4 (best fit for S2)
    Fitted via chi2 scan to the S2 X-ray spectrum; basis of the jet power limits.
  • p (low-energy electron index) = 2.16, 2.71, 2.18 for S1, S2, S3
    SED fit parameter in the broken power-law electron distribution.
  • q (high-energy electron index) = 3.61, 3.21, 3.35 for S1, S2, S3
    SED fit parameter in the broken power-law electron distribution.
  • gamma_b (break Lorentz factor) = 544, 237, 559 for S1, S2, S3
    SED fit parameter, frozen at best fit value.
  • gamma_max (high-energy cutoff) = 1.41e4, 2.09e4, 1.73e4 for S1, S2, S3
    SED fit parameter, frozen at best fit value.
  • B (magnetic field) = 1.78, 2.10, 1.88 G for S1, S2, S3
    SED fit parameter with confidence intervals reported.
  • Gamma (bulk Lorentz factor) = 32.94, 15.02, 28.92 for S1, S2, S3
    SED fit parameter, frozen at best fit value; drives the claimed flaring-state increase.
  • Viewing angle theta = 3 degrees
    Assumed in the model; converts Gamma to Doppler factor delta and enters jet power.
  • R (emission region size) = Not listed in Table 5; likely fixed from variability timescale R <= 9e16 cm
    Enters jet power as R^2 in Eq. (10); based on light travel time argument with delta about 20 assumed.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption One-zone leptonic emission model (synchrotron, SSC, EC) describes the source.
    Invoked in Section 3.3; the fitted parameters depend on this choice.
  • domain assumption Broken power-law electron distribution with exponential cutoff.
    Equation (6); assumed shape for the emitting electrons.
  • domain assumption External seed photons for EC are a blackbody at 1000 K.
    Section 3.3; the EC component and gamma_min relation in Eq. (7) use this temperature.
  • domain assumption Equipartition between magnetic field and electron energy densities.
    Section 3.3; imposed to break degeneracies in the SED fit.
  • domain assumption Jet matter content is either e+e- pairs or e-p with one cold proton per non-thermal electron.
    Section 3.4; defines the light and heavy jet power limits.
  • domain assumption Emission region size R bounded by light travel time, R <= c delta tau/(1+z), with delta about 20.
    Section 3.1; used in the jet power formula (Eq. 10) as R^2.
  • domain assumption Standard flat Lambda-CDM cosmology (Omega_M=0.3, Omega_L=0.7, H0=71).
    Section 1; used for luminosity and distance estimates.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multi-wavelength analysis of FSRQ B2 1348+30B: Constraints on the jet power." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DUXJDRFQ

@misc{pith2026250602821,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multi-wavelength analysis of FSRQ B2 1348+30B: Constraints on the jet power},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DUXJDRFQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.02821}
}
abstract

We present 14.5-year multi-wavelength analysis of flat-spectrum radio quasar B2 1348+30B using Swift-UVOT, Swift-XRT, and Fermi-LAT observations. In the gamma-ray band, the 3 day bin lightcurve reveals two major flaring events on 2010-09-19 (55458 MJD) and 2022-05-26 (59725 MJD) detected at flux levels $(2.5\pm 0.5) \times 10^{-7}\,\rm{ph\,cm^{-2}\,s^{-1}}$ and $(5.2\pm 0.6) \times 10^{-7}\,\rm{ph\,cm^{-2}\,s^{-1}}$. The Bayesian block analysis of the flares suggested the variability timescale to be $\leq$ 3\,day. To study the dynamic nature of the source, multi-wavelength spectrum was obtained for three flux states which includes the two flaring state and a relative low state. The $\gamma$-ray spectra of the source in all the states are well fitted by a power-law model with maximum photon energy < 20 GeV. In X-ray, a power-law model can explain the flaring state spectra while a broken power-law with extremely hard high energy component was required to model the low flux state. This indicates the presence of the low energy cutoff in the Compton spectral component. A simple one-zone leptonic model involving synchrotron, synchrotron self Compton and external Compton mechanism can successfully reproduce the broad-band spectral energy distribution of all the flux states. The model parameters suggest significant increase in the jet Lorentz factor during the high flux states. Further, the best fit parameters are used to constrain the minimum energy of the emitting electron distribution from the hard high energy spectrum of the low flux state. This analysis was extended to draw limits on the kinetic power of the blazar jet and was compared with the Eddington luminosity of the central black hole.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.02821 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The multi-wavelength lightcurve of FSRQ B2 1348+30B between 2008-08-04 to 2022-11-03 (54682–59886 MJD). (a) 3-day bin 𝛾-ray lightcurve integrated over the energy range 0.1–300 GeV [(Flux (E>100 MeV)] in units of [ph cm−2 s −1]. (b) Swift-XRT lightcurve in units of [erg cm−2 s −1] in the 0.3-10 keV energy range. The panels (c) and (d) represent the Swift-UVOT flux points for W1, M2, W2 V, B and U bands in units of [e… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Lightcurve of the state S3 in 7-day (left) and 1-day (right) bining. Bayesian analysis approach conducted for defining solid blocks and estimating variability timescale. the most brightest one. The Bayesian blocks along with the weekly averaged lightcurve is shown in Fig.2 (left). The duration corresponding to block 3 was again investigated using 1-day averaged bins and the Bayesian analysis showed 3 subblocks sugge… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Fractional variability amplitude (𝐹𝑣𝑎𝑟) obtained in various energy bands is plotted against the energy during 2008-08-04 to 2022-11-03 (54682–59886 MJD). Energy band Fvar 𝛾-ray (0.1–300 GeV) 0.66 ± 0.03 X-ray (0.3–10 keV) 0.39 ± 0.06 UVOT band-W2 0.32 ± 0.05 UVOT band-M2 0.48 ± 0.02 UVOT band-W1 0.45 ± 0.02 UVOT band-U 0.53 ± 0.02 UVOT band-B 0.82 ± 0.09 UVOT band-V 0.76 ± 0.09 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p00… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Spectral fit to 𝛾-ray SEDs during the states S1, S2 and S3 having simultaneous multi-wavelength observations, and for the entire 𝛾-ray observation duration. The spectral fit models are power-law (red line) and log-parabola (green line). Period Time Model Flux Γ 𝛼 𝛽 TSc…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Broad-band SED plots of the FSRQ B2 1348+30B, during flaring states S1, S3 and quiescent state S2. The observed flux points and the corresponding emission components are depicted in legends of each figure, respectively. 3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.2 4.4 4.6 min 0 20 40 60 80 100…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left plot: Solid dodgerblue line denotes the variation of 𝜒 2 with minimum electron energy (𝛾𝑚𝑖𝑛). Right plot: Variation of jet power as function of 𝛾𝑚𝑖𝑛. For both the plots: The dashed grey lines represent the best fit value of 𝛾𝑚𝑖𝑛. The green and blue vertical lines …

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...

  3. [3]

    , author Acero , F

    author Abdollahi , S. , author Acero , F. , author Ackermann , M. , author Ajello , M. , author Atwood , W.B. , author Axelsson , M. , author Baldini , L. , author Ballet , J. , author Barbiellini , G. , author Bastieri , D. , author Becerra Gonzalez , J. , author Bellazzini , R. , author Berretta , A. , author Bissaldi , E. , author Blandford , R.D. , au...

    arXiv 2020

  4. [4]

    , author Ajello , M

    author Ackermann , M. , author Ajello , M. , author Albert , A. , author Allafort , A. , author Antolini , E. , author Baldini , L. , author Ballet , J. , author Barbiellini , G. , author Bastieri , D. , author Bechtol , K. , author Bellazzini , R. , author Blandford , R.D. , author Bloom , E.D. , author Bonamente , E. , author Bottacini , E. , author Bou...

    arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    , year 2000

    author Aharonian , F.A. , year 2000 . title TeV gamma rays from BL Lac objects due to synchrotron radiation of extremely high energy protons . journal volume 5 , pages 377--395 . :10.1016/S1384-1076(00)00039-7, http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0003159 arXiv:astro-ph/0003159

    arXiv 2000

  6. [6]

    , author Atwood , W.B

    author Ajello , M. , author Atwood , W.B. , author Baldini , L. , author Ballet , J. , author Barbiellini , G. , author Bastieri , D. , author Bellazzini , R. , author Bissaldi , E. , author Blandford , R.D. , author Bloom , E.D. , author Bonino , R. , author Bregeon , J. , author Britto , R.J. , author Bruel , P. , author Buehler , R. , author Buson , S....

    arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    Constraint on the time variation of the fine-structure constant with the SDSS-III/BOSS DR12 quasar sample

    author Albareti , F.D. , author Comparat , J. , author Guti \'e rrez , C.M. , author Prada , F. , author P \^a ris , I. , author Schlegel , D. , author L \'o pez-Corredoira , M. , author Schneider , D.P. , author Manchado , A. , author Garc \' a-Hern \'a ndez , D.A. , author Petitjean , P. , author Ge , J. , year 2015 . title Constraint on the time variat...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  8. [8]

    , year 1996

    author Arnaud , K.A. , year 1996 . title XSPEC: The First Ten Years , in: editor Jacoby , G.H. , editor Barnes , J. (Eds.), booktitle Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V , p. pages 17

    1996

Show all 75 references
  1. [9]

    , author Abdo , A.A

    author Atwood , W.B. , author Abdo , A.A. , author Ackermann , M. , author Althouse , W. , author Anderson , B. , author Axelsson , M. , author Baldini , L. , author Ballet , J. , author Band , D.L. , author Barbiellini , G. , author Bartelt , J. , author Bastieri , D. , autho...

    2009 arXiv

  2. [10]

    , author Protheroe , R.J

    author Bednarek , W. , author Protheroe , R.J. , year 1999 . title Gamma-ray and neutrino flares produced by protons accelerated on an accretion disc surface in active galactic nuclei . journal volume 302 , pages 373--380 . :10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02132.x, http://arxiv.org/a...

    1999

  3. [11]

    , author Blandford , R.D

    author Begelman , M.C. , author Blandford , R.D. , author Rees , M.J. , year 1984 . title Theory of extragalactic radio sources . journal Reviews of Modern Physics volume 56 , pages 255--351 . :10.1103/RevModPhys.56.255

    1984 doi

  4. [12]

    , author Robinson , D.K

    author Bevington , P.R. , author Robinson , D.K. , year 2003 . title Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences

    2003

  5. [13]

    , author Stalin , C.S

    author Bharathan , A.M. , author Stalin , C.S. , author Chatterjee , R. , author Sahayanathan , S. , author Pal , I. , author Mathew , B. , author Agrawal , V.K. , year 2024 . title Detection of X-ray polarization in the high synchrotron peaked blazar 1ES 1959+650 . journal Jo...

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    , author Rees , M.J

    author Blandford , R.D. , author Rees , M.J. , year 1978 . title Some comments on radiation mechanisms in Lacertids. , in: editor Wolfe , A.M. (Ed.), booktitle BL Lac Objects , pp. pages 328--341

    1978

  7. [15]

    , author Znajek , R.L

    author Blandford , R.D. , author Znajek , R.L. , year 1977 . title Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes. journal volume 179 , pages 433--456 . :10.1093/mnras/179.3.433

    1977 doi

  8. [16]

    , author Pavlidou , V

    author Blinov , D. , author Pavlidou , V. , author Papadakis , I. , author Kiehlmann , S. , author Panopoulou , G. , author Liodakis , I. , author King , O.G. , author Angelakis , E. , author Balokovi \'c , M. , author Das , H. , author Feiler , R. , author Fuhrmann , L. , aut...

    2015 arXiv

  9. [17]

    , author Marscher , A.P

    author Bloom , S.D. , author Marscher , A.P. , year 1996 . title An Analysis of the Synchrotron Self-Compton Model for the Multi--Wave Band Spectra of Blazars . journal volume 461 , pages 657 . :10.1086/177092

    1996 doi

  10. [18]

    , author Reimer , A

    author B \"o ttcher , M. , author Reimer , A. , author Sweeney , K. , author Prakash , A. , year 2013 . title Leptonic and Hadronic Modeling of Fermi-detected Blazars . journal volume 768 , pages 54 . :10.1088/0004-637X/768/1/54, http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.0605 arXiv:1304.0605

    2013 arXiv

  11. [19]

    , author Marais, J

    author Britto, R. , author Marais, J. , author van Soelen, B. , author Meintjes, P. , year 2017 . title Blazar variability and gamma-ray emission - signatures for leptonic and hadronic jet gamma-ray production models , p. pages 055 . :10.22323/1.269.0055

    2017 doi

  12. [20]

    , year 1998

    author Buckley , J.H. , year 1998 . title ASTROPHYSICS: What the Wild Things Are . journal Science volume 279 , pages 676 . :10.1126/science.279.5351.676

    1998 doi

  13. [21]

    , author Hill , J.E

    author Burrows , D.N. , author Hill , J.E. , author Nousek , J.A. , author Kennea , J.A. , author Wells , A. , author Osborne , J.P. , author Abbey , A.F. , author Beardmore , A. , author Mukerjee , K. , author Short , A.D.T. , author Chincarini , G. , author Campana , S. , au...

    2005 arXiv

  14. [22]

    , author Ghisellini , G

    author Celotti , A. , author Ghisellini , G. , year 2008 . title The power of blazar jets . journal volume 385 , pages 283--300 . :10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12758.x, http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.4112 arXiv:0711.4112

    2008

  15. [23]

    , author Zech , A

    author Cerruti , M. , author Zech , A. , author Emery , G. , author Guarin , D. , year 2017 . title Hadronic modeling of TeV AGN: Gammas and neutrinos , in: booktitle 6th International Symposium on High Energy Gamma-Ray Astronomy , publisher AIP . p. pages 050027 . :10.1063/1....

    2017 arXiv

  16. [24]

    , author Gu , Q

    author Chen , Y. , author Gu , Q. , author Fan , J. , author Zhou , H. , author Yuan , Y. , author Gu , W. , author Wu , Q. , author Xiong , D. , author Guo , X. , author Ding , N. , author Yu , X. , year 2021 . title The Powers of Relativistic Jets Depend on the Spin of Accre...

    2021 arXiv

  17. [25]

    , author Cutini , S

    author Costamante , L. , author Cutini , S. , author Tosti , G. , author Antolini , E. , author Tramacere , A. , year 2018 . title On the origin of gamma-rays in Fermi blazars: beyondthe broad-line region . journal volume 477 , pages 4749--4767 . :10.1093/mnras/sty887, http://...

    2018 arXiv

  18. [26]

    , author Gupta, N

    author Das, S. , author Gupta, N. , author Razzaque, S. , year 2021 . title A lepto-hadronic model of gamma-ray signal from extreme blazars . journal PoS volume ICRC2021 , pages 1002 . :10.22323/1.395.1002

    2021 doi

  19. [27]

    , author Shappee , B.J

    author de Jaeger , T. , author Shappee , B.J. , author Kochanek , C.S. , author Hinkle , J.T. , author Garrappa , S. , author Liodakis , I. , author Franckowiak , A. , author Stanek , K.Z. , author Beacom , J.F. , author Prieto , J.L. , year 2023 . title Optical/ -ray blazar f...

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    , author Finke , J.D

    author Dermer , C.D. , author Finke , J.D. , author Krug , H. , author B \"o ttcher , M. , year 2009 . title Gamma-Ray Studies of Blazars: Synchro-Compton Analysis of Flat Spectrum Radio Quasars . journal volume 692 , pages 32--46 . :10.1088/0004-637X/692/1/32, http://arxiv.or...

    2009 arXiv

  21. [29]

    , author Schlickeiser , R

    author Dermer , C.D. , author Schlickeiser , R. , year 1993 . title Model for the High-Energy Emission from Blazars . journal volume 416 , pages 458 . :10.1086/173251

    1993 doi

  22. [30]

    , author B \"o ttcher , M

    author Diltz , C. , author B \"o ttcher , M. , year 2016 . title Leptonic and Lepto-Hadronic Modeling of the 2010 November Flare from 3C 454.3 . journal volume 826 , pages 54 . :10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/54, http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.06923 arXiv:1605.06923

    2016 arXiv

  23. [31]

    , author Ghisellini , G

    author Dondi , L. , author Ghisellini , G. , year 1995 . title Gamma-ray-loud blazars and beaming . journal volume 273 , pages 583--595 . :10.1093/mnras/273.3.583

    1995 doi

  24. [32]

    , author Chincarini , G

    author Gehrels , N. , author Chincarini , G. , author Giommi , P. , author Mason , K.O. , author Nousek , J.A. , author Wells , A.A. , author White , N.E. , author Barthelmy , S.D. , author Burrows , D.N. , author Cominsky , L.R. , author Hurley , K.C. , author Marshall , F.E....

    2004 arXiv

  25. [33]

    , author George, I.M

    author Ghisellini, G. , author George, I.M. , author Done, C. , year 1989 . title Bl lac objects . journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society volume 241 , pages 43P

    1989

  26. [34]

    , author Maraschi , L

    author Ghisellini , G. , author Maraschi , L. , author Treves , A. , year 1985 . title Inhomogeneous synchrotron-self-compton models and the problem of relativistic beaming of BL Lac objects. journal volume 146 , pages 204--212

    1985

  27. [35]

    , author Tavecchio , F

    author Ghisellini , G. , author Tavecchio , F. , author Maraschi , L. , author Celotti , A. , author Sbarrato , T. , year 2014 . title The power of relativistic jets is larger than the luminosity of their accretion disks . journal volume 515 , pages 376--378 . :10.1038/nature1...

    2014 arXiv

  28. [36]

    , year 2018

    author Goyal , A. , year 2018 . title A Comparative Study of Multiwavelength Blazar Variability on Decades to Minutes Timescales . journal Galaxies volume 6 , pages 34 . :10.3390/galaxies6010034

    2018 doi

  29. [37]

    , author Sahayanathan , S

    author Jagan , S.K. , author Sahayanathan , S. , author Rieger , F.M. , author Ravikumar , C.D. , year 2021 . title Convex X-ray spectra of PKS 2155-304 and constraints on the minimum electron energy . journal volume 506 , pages 3996--4006 . :10.1093/mnras/stab1993, http://arx...

    2021 arXiv

  30. [38]

    , author Burton , W.B

    author Kalberla , P.M.W. , author Burton , W.B. , author Hartmann , D. , author Arnal , E.M. , author Bajaja , E. , author Morras , R. , author Poeppel , W.G.L. , year 2005 . title VizieR Online Data Catalog: Leiden/Argentine/Bonn (LAB) Survey of Galactic HI (Kalberla+ 2005) ....

    2005

  31. [39]

    , author Rieger , F.M

    author Katsoulakos , G. , author Rieger , F.M. , year 2018 . title Magnetospheric Gamma-Ray Emission in Active Galactic Nuclei . journal volume 852 , pages 112 . :10.3847/1538-4357/aaa003, http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.04203 arXiv:1712.04203

    2018 arXiv

  32. [40]

    , author Savolainen , T

    author Kiehlmann , S. , author Savolainen , T. , author Jorstad , S.G. , author Sokolovsky , K.V. , author Schinzel , F.K. , author Marscher , A.P. , author Larionov , V.M. , author Agudo , I. , author Akitaya , H. , author Ben \' tez , E. , author Berdyugin , A. , author Blin...

    2016 arXiv

  33. [41]

    , author Rieger , F.M

    author Kirk , J.G. , author Rieger , F.M. , author Mastichiadis , A. , year 1998 . title Particle acceleration and synchrotron emission in blazar jets . journal volume 333 , pages 452--458 . :10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9801265, http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9801265 arXiv:astro-ph/9801265

    1998 doi arXiv

  34. [42]

    , author Nalewajko , K

    author Madejski , G.M. , author Nalewajko , K. , author Madsen , K.K. , author Chiang , J. , author Balokovi \'c , M. , author Paneque , D. , author Furniss , A.K. , author Hayashida , M. , author Urry , C.M. , author Sikora , M. , author Ajello , M. , author Blandford , R.D. ...

    2016 arXiv

  35. [43]

    , author Biermann , P.L

    author Mannheim , K. , author Biermann , P.L. , year 1992 . title Gamma-ray bursts from extragalactic jets . journal volume 253 , pages L21

    1992

  36. [44]

    , author Bertsch , D.L

    author Mattox , J.R. , author Bertsch , D.L. , author Chiang , J. , author Dingus , B.L. , author Digel , S.W. , author Esposito , J.A. , author Fierro , J.M. , author Hartman , R.C. , author Hunter , S.D. , author Kanbach , G. , author Kniffen , D.A. , author Lin , Y.C. , aut...

    1996

  37. [45]

    , author Das , S

    author Mondal , S.K. , author Das , S. , author Gupta , N. , year 2023 . title Exploring the Emission Mechanisms of Mrk 180 with Long-term X-Ray and -Ray Data . journal volume 948 , pages 75 . :10.3847/1538-4357/acc46b, http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.07331 arXiv:2212.07331

    2023 arXiv

  38. [46]

    , author Protheroe , R.J

    author M \"u cke , A. , author Protheroe , R.J. , year 2001 . title A proton synchrotron blazar model for flaring in Markarian 501 . journal Astroparticle Physics volume 15 , pages 121--136 . :10.1016/S0927-6505(00)00141-9, http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0004052 arXiv:astro-ph/0004052

    2001 arXiv

  39. [47]

    , author Mannheim , K

    author Nellen , L. , author Mannheim , K. , author Biermann , P.L. , year 1993 . title Gamma-ray bursts from ultra-relativistic shock waves . journal Physical Review D volume 47 , pages 5270 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.47.5270

    1993 doi

  40. [48]

    , author Ribordy , M

    author Neronov , A. , author Ribordy , M. , year 2009 . title Probing the very high energy gamma-ray spectral curvature in the blazar energy spectra with the next-generation Cherenkov telescopes . journal Physical Review D volume 80 , pages 083008 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.80.083008

    2009 doi

  41. [49]

    , author Semikoz , D.V

    author Neronov , A. , author Semikoz , D.V. , author Ptitsyna , K. , year 2017 . title Strong constraints on hadronic models of blazar activity from Fermi and IceCube stacking analysis . journal volume 603 , pages A135 . :10.1051/0004-6361/201630098, http://arxiv.org/abs/1611....

    2017 arXiv

  42. [50]

    , author Semikoz , D.V

    author Neronov , A.Y. , author Semikoz , D.V. , year 2002 . title Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays and Violation of Lorentz Invariance . journal Physical Review D volume 66 , pages 123003 . :10.1103/PhysRevD.66.123003

    2002 doi

  43. [51]

    , author Abdo , A.A

    author Nolan , P.L. , author Abdo , A.A. , author Ackermann , M. , author Ajello , M. , author Allafort , A. , author Antolini , E. , author Atwood , W.B. , author Axelsson , M. , author Baldini , L. , author Ballet , J. , author Barbiellini , G. , author Bastieri , D. , autho...

    2012 arXiv

  44. [52]

    , author Yi , S.K

    author Oh , K. , author Yi , S.K. , author Schawinski , K. , author Koss , M. , author Trakhtenbrot , B. , author Soto , K. , year 2015 . title VizieR Online Data Catalog: Catalog of Type-1 AGNs from SDSS-DR7 (Oh+, 2015) . journal VizieR Online Data Catalog , pages J/ApJS/219/1

    2015

  45. [53]

    , author Diltz , C

    author Paliya , V.S. , author Diltz , C. , author B \"o ttcher , M. , author Stalin , C.S. , author Buckley , D. , year 2016 . title A Hard Gamma-Ray Flare from 3C 279 in 2013 December . journal volume 817 , pages 61 . :10.3847/0004-637X/817/1/61, http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.002...

    2016 arXiv

  46. [54]

    , author Taylor , G.B

    author Petrov , L. , author Taylor , G.B. , year 2011 . title Precise Absolute Astrometry from the VLBA Imaging and Polarimetry Survey at 5 GHz . journal volume 142 , pages 89 . :10.1088/0004-6256/142/3/89, http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.2382 arXiv:1106.2382

    2011 arXiv

  47. [55]

    , author Bosch-Ramon , V

    author Rieger , F.M. , author Bosch-Ramon , V. , author Duffy , P. , year 2007 . title Fermi acceleration in astrophysical jets . journal volume 309 , pages 119--125 . :10.1007/s10509-007-9466-z, http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0610141 arXiv:astro-ph/0610141

    2007 arXiv

  48. [56]

    , author B \"o ttcher , M

    author Robinson , J. , author B \"o ttcher , M. , year 2024 . title Neutrino Detection Rates from Lepto-hadronic Model Simulations of Bright Blazar Flares . journal volume 977 , pages 42 . :10.3847/1538-4357/ad8dce, http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21881 arXiv:2410.21881

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    , author Kennedy , T.E

    author Roming , P.W.A. , author Kennedy , T.E. , author Mason , K.O. , author Nousek , J.A. , author Ahr , L. , author Bingham , R.E. , author Broos , P.S. , author Carter , M.J. , author Hancock , B.K. , author Huckle , H.E. , author Hunsberger , S.D. , author Kawakami , H. ,...

    2005 arXiv

  50. [58]

    , author Koch , T.S

    author Roming , P.W.A. , author Koch , T.S. , author Oates , S.R. , author Porterfield , B.L. , author Vanden Berk , D.E. , author Boyd , P.T. , author Holland , S.T. , author Hoversten , E.A. , author Immler , S. , author Marshall , F.E. , author Page , M.J. , author Racusin ...

    2009 arXiv

  51. [59]

    , author Sinha , A

    author Sahayanathan , S. , author Sinha , A. , author Misra , R. , year 2018 . title Broadband spectral fitting of blazars using XSPEC . journal Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics volume 18 , pages 035 . :10.1088/1674-4527/18/3/35, http://arxiv.org/abs/1801.00685 arXiv:1801.00685

    2018 arXiv

  52. [60]

    , author Norris , J.P

    author Scargle , J.D. , author Norris , J.P. , author Jackson , B. , author Chiang , J. , year 2013 . title Studies in Astronomical Time Series Analysis. VI. Bayesian Block Representations . journal volume 764 , pages 167 . :10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/167, http://arxiv.org/abs/12...

    2013 arXiv

  53. [61]

    , author Falomo , R

    author Scarpa , R. , author Falomo , R. , year 1997 . title Are high polarization quasars and BL Lacertae objects really different? A study of the optical spectral properties. journal volume 325 , pages 109--123

    1997

  54. [62]

    , author Finkbeiner , D.P

    author Schlafly , E.F. , author Finkbeiner , D.P. , year 2011 . title Measuring Reddening with Sloan Digital Sky Survey Stellar Spectra and Recalibrating SFD . journal volume 737 , pages 103 . :10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103, http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.4804 arXiv:1012.4804

    2011 arXiv

  55. [63]

    , author Begelman , M.C

    author Sikora , M. , author Begelman , M.C. , author Rees , M.J. , year 1994 . title Comptonization of Diffuse Ambient Radiation by a Relativistic Jet: The Source of Gamma Rays from Blazars? journal volume 421 , pages 153 . :10.1086/173633

    1994 doi

  56. [64]

    , author Padovani , P

    author Stickel , M. , author Padovani , P. , author Urry , C.M. , author Fried , J.W. , author Kuehr , H. , year 1991 . title The Complete Sample of 1 Jansky BL Lacertae Objects. I. Summary Properties . journal volume 374 , pages 431 . :10.1086/170133

    1991 doi

  57. [65]

    , author Morris , S.L

    author Stocke , J.T. , author Morris , S.L. , author Gioia , I.M. , author Maccacaro , T. , author Schild , R. , author Wolter , A. , author Fleming , T.A. , author Henry , J.P. , year 1991 . title The Einstein Observatory Extended Medium-Sensitivity Survey. II. The Optical Id...

    1991 doi

  58. [66]

    , year 2023

    author Sunanda , author Moharana , R. , year 2023 . title Time-lag in hadronic channel: to explore delayed VHE-flare of 3C 279 . journal arXiv e-prints , pages arXiv:2310.03561 :10.48550/arXiv.2310.03561, http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.03561 arXiv:2310.03561

    2023 doi arXiv

  59. [67]

    , author Maraschi , L

    author Tavecchio , F. , author Maraschi , L. , author Ghisellini , G. , year 1998 . title Constraints on the Physical Parameters of TeV Blazars . journal volume 509 , pages 608--619 . :10.1086/306526, http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9809051 arXiv:astro-ph/9809051

    1998 arXiv

  60. [68]

    , author Vandenbroucke , J

    author Thwaites , J. , author Vandenbroucke , J. , author Santander , M. , author IceCube Collaboration , year 2022 . title FSRQ B2 1348+30B: Upper limits from a neutrino search with IceCube . journal The Astronomer's Telegram volume 15439 , pages 1

    2022

  61. [69]

    , author Sliusar , V

    author Tramacere , A. , author Sliusar , V. , author Walter , R. , author Jurysek , J. , author Balbo , M. , year 2022 . title Radio- -ray response in blazars as a signature of adiabatic blob expansion . journal volume 658 , pages A173 . :10.1051/0004-6361/202142003, http://ar...

    2022 arXiv

  62. [70]

    , author Padovani , P

    author Urry , C.M. , author Padovani , P. , year 1995 . title Unified Schemes for Radio-Loud Active Galactic Nuclei . journal Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific volume 107 , pages 803 . :10.1086/133630

    1995 doi

  63. [71]

    , author Forman , J

    author Valverde , J. , author Forman , J. , year 2022 . title Fermi-LAT detection of enhanced gamma-ray activity from the FSRQ B2 1348+30B . journal The Astronomer's Telegram volume 15402 , pages 1

    2022

  64. [72]

    , author Edelson , R

    author Vaughan , S. , author Edelson , R. , author Warwick , R.S. , author Uttley , P. , year 2003 . title On characterizing the variability properties of X-ray light curves from active galaxies . journal volume 345 , pages 1271--1284 . :10.1046/j.1365-2966.2003.07042.x, http:...

    2003

  65. [73]

    , author Spanier , F

    author Weidinger , M. , author Spanier , F. , year 2013 . title Hadronic Modeling of Blazars , in: booktitle European Physical Journal Web of Conferences , p. pages 05009 . :10.1051/epjconf/20136105009

    2013

  66. [74]

    , author Caputo , R

    author Wood , M. , author Caputo , R. , author Charles , E. , author Di Mauro , M. , author Magill , J. , author Perkins , J.S. , author Fermi-LAT Collaboration , year 2017 . title Fermipy: An open-source Python package for analysis of Fermi-LAT Data , in: booktitle 35th Inter...

    2017 arXiv

  67. [75]

    , author Bottcher , M

    author Zdziarski , A.A. , author Bottcher , M. , year 2015 . title Hadronic models of blazars require a change of the accretion paradigm. journal volume 450 , pages L21--L25 . :10.1093/mnrasl/slv039, http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.06124 arXiv:1501.06124

    2015 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.