Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 29 references

Genetic Algorithm-Based Inverse Design of Guided Wave Planar Terahertz Filters

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A genetic algorithm, guided by a fast matrix surrogate, can automatically design planar terahertz band-stop filters from a target spectrum.

desk verdict A credible proof-of-concept for GA inverse design of CPS-integrated THz filters, but the paper needs to define the pixel-to-CPS mapping and provide quantitative validation before the framework is fully convincing. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.03372 v1 pith:G7LVUCPJ submitted 2025-06-03 physics.app-ph physics.optics

Ali Dehghanian , Thomas Darcie , Levi Smith This is my paper
classification physics.app-phphysics.optics
keywords terahertzfiltersgeneticalgorithminversedesigncoplanarstriplineABCDmatrixmethodband-stopfiltersystem-on-chipsurrogatemodeling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that a genetic algorithm, paired with a fast analytical surrogate, can automatically design planar terahertz band-stop filters etched into a coplanar stripline. The surrogate replaces full-wave simulation with cascaded ABCD transmission-line matrices, cutting the cost of evaluating one candidate design by more than three orders of magnitude. The authors demonstrate filters centered at 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 THz with 150 GHz target bandwidths, and filters with 10, 20, and 30 dB rejection depths, all within one fixed 2000-micrometer footprint. Full-wave simulation confirms the final designs, suggesting a practical path from target spectrum to fabrication-ready geometry.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the cascaded ABCD transmission-line model of the pixelated filter, in which each 10 µm column along propagation acts as a uniform quasi-static CPS segment. Per-column impedance is assigned from the local geometry via the closed-form elliptic-integral formula $Z_{\mathrm{CPS}} = (120\pi/\sqrt{\varepsilon_{re}})\,K(k_{\mathrm{CPS}})/K(k'_{\mathrm{CPS}})$, $k_{\mathrm{CPS}} = S/(S+2W)$, and the total two-port response is the matrix product of all column segments. This surrogate runs orders of magnitude faster than full-wave analysis, which is what turns a 200-individual, 120-generation genetic search into a roughly 40-minute optimization run instead of weeks of simulation.

What would settle it

Fabricate one of the inverse-designed filters on the silicon-nitride membrane and measure its transmission and reflection. If the measured stopband depth, center frequency, or bandwidth deviates from the full-wave prediction beyond the stated tolerances, especially for the 1.0 THz filter where the surrogate is already acknowledged to diverge, then the ABCD-guided search is not reliably delivering its designed spectral response.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that inverse design of CPS-integrated planar THz filters becomes computationally practical when a quasi-static ABCD-matrix model serves as the fitness evaluator inside a genetic search. Each of the 200 columns of the 300 µm by 2000 µm design grid is treated as a uniform CPS transmission-line segment, with characteristic impedance computed from the local conductor width $W$ and strip spacing $S$ through the closed-form elliptic-integral formula $Z_{\mathrm{CPS}} = (120\pi/\sqrt{\varepsilon_{re}})\,K(k_{\mathrm{CPS}})/K(k'_{\mathrm{CPS}})$ with $k_{\mathrm{CPS}} = S/(S+2W)$. Cascading the per-column matrices and converting to scattering parameters reproduces the target magnitude and linear phase closely enough to guide evolution, and the paper reports that the optimizer meets specified spectral targets, including roughly $-46$ dB rejection against a $-50$ dB target at 0.8 THz. Full-wave validation shows strong agreement with the surrogate below about 0.9 THz, with divergence above that attributed to radiation and edge diffraction. The paper further claims that the inverse-designed filters beat a conventional periodic filter baseline in length and rejection depth, and identifies this as the first GA-plus-ABCD design flow for CPS-integrated THz filters.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that every 10-micrometer column of the binary pattern behaves as a uniform quasi-static CPS transmission-line segment whose impedance depends only on local width and spacing, with no radiation, edge diffraction, or coupling between columns; the paper itself reports that this model begins to diverge from full-wave simulation above about 0.9 THz, and one of the demonstrated filters is centered at 1.0 THz.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Designers can specify a target spectrum and get a fabricable CPS-integrated geometry without manual parameter sweeps.
  • The 40-minute optimization time on a desktop CPU makes multi-target searches and repeated runs with different seeds practical.
  • The connectivity constraint preserves a DC bias path, so the synthesized filters are compatible with terahertz system-on-chip experiments that need to bias photoconductive switches.
  • Because the surrogate and full-wave results agree below about 0.9 THz, the framework is currently most trustworthy for sub-terahertz designs; higher-frequency designs need explicit full-wave re-verification.
  • The same optimization loop should extend to other planar devices such as couplers, reflectors, and absorbers if the ABCD model can represent their unit cells.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A further step beyond the present framework would be to replace the quasi-static surrogate with a corrected or hybrid model above 1 THz, where radiation and edge diffraction dominate; the paper's own data provide the benchmark for how much the surrogate needs correcting.
  • Because the phase error carried only 10 percent of the loss weight and the target phase was linear, the demonstrated designs are not a strong test of phase-sensitive optimization; a stringent dispersion-shaping objective would be a harder and more informative validation.
  • The pixel grid of 4 µm by 10 µm restricts the geometry family, so the reported non-intuitive layouts are optimal only within that coarse binary representation; a multi-resolution refinement could push rejection depths closer to target.
  • An experimental comparison between the inverse-designed filter and the conventional periodic baseline, both fabricated and measured on the same platform, would be the decisive test of the paper's claimed superiority.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a genetic algorithm (GA)-based inverse design method for planar THz band-stop filters integrated in coplanar striplines (CPS). The GA optimizes a 200×75 binary pixel pattern, with each column evaluated as a quasi-static CPS transmission-line segment via the ABCD matrix method (Eqs. 5–8). The fitness is a weighted RMSE between simulated and target S21/S11 magnitude and phase. Final validation is performed with ANSYS HFSS. Proof-of-concept designs include band-stop filters at 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 THz with a fixed 2000-µm footprint and variable rejection depths. The paper claims a computational speed-up exceeding three orders of magnitude, reports convergence over 10 independent runs, and identifies itself as the first ABCD-based GA inverse design for CPS-integrated THz filters.

Significance. If the framework is validated, it offers a practical route to automated synthesis of fabricable planar THz filters, with a transparent speed/accuracy trade-off. The manuscript's strengths include a concrete runtime comparison (40 minutes for an optimization run versus more than 2 hours per HFSS simulation), an explicit connectivity constraint for future experimental biasing, repeated (10-run) convergence statistics, and an external FEM check for several designs. The core limitation is that the surrogate-to-full-wave agreement is only qualitative and is acknowledged to degrade above 0.9 THz, which is exactly where one demonstrated filter operates; this tempers the significance until quantitative validation is provided.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II-A and Section III, Eqs. (5)–(8)] The ABCD surrogate treats each 10-µm column as a uniform CPS transmission line characterized by a single conductor width W and gap S (Eq. 7), but the design representation is a 200×75 binary grid with no stated rule for extracting W and S from an arbitrary column. In particular, the paper does not constrain each column to contain exactly two metal regions, nor does it define how W and S are computed for columns with disconnected metal islands, a single wide conductor, or slot-like patterns. Because Eq. (7) is undefined for such columns, the surrogate used throughout the GA may not describe the actual electromagnetic response of the generated geometries. Please specify the extraction rule and verify that the optimized designs (e.g., Fig. 4d) conform to it, or add a constraint that guarantees a two-strip CPS topology per column.
  2. [Fig. 4(a) and Fig. 4 caption] The text and caption state that the 0.8 THz design 'meets the specified rejection depth and bandwidth with high accuracy,' but the target rejection is −50 dB while the computed response achieves approximately −46 dB. That is a 4-dB discrepancy at the central claim's primary metric. Please rephrase to 'approximately meets' or report the achieved value and deviation from the target quantitatively.
  3. [Section III, Figs. 4(c) and 7(b)] The paper acknowledges that ABCD results 'begin to diverge' from HFSS above 0.9 THz due to radiation and edge diffraction, yet one demonstrated filter is centered at 1.0 THz and the ABCD-HFSS comparison for it is described only qualitatively as 'strong agreement.' No quantitative ABCD-versus-FEM error metric (e.g., RMSE in S21 magnitude over the passband and stopband) is reported. Because the optimization objective is RMSE against a target, a quantitative surrogate-error assessment is required to support the claim that FEM validates the design, particularly at 1.0 THz where the surrogate is least trustworthy. Please include frequency-resolved error metrics for all three center-frequency filters.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (1)] The text says 'The loss function L = -RMSE' but the right-hand side of Eq. (1) is a positive weighted sum of RMSE terms. Please reconcile the sign convention and explain how the GA maximizes fitness while the loss is negative RMSE.
  2. [Fig. 6] The figure caption is labeled '(e)' even though it is a standalone figure; remove the stray '(e)'.
  3. [Section II-A] The connectivity constraint is described as maintaining 'a continuous conductive pathway' for biasing, but a CPS line has two separate conductors; please clarify whether the constraint is applied to both strips and how the GA initialization enforces it.
  4. [Conclusion] The claim of being 'the first application of GA-based inverse design using the ABCD matrix method for CPS-integrated THz filters' is presented without a systematic literature comparison; please provide a more precise statement of what exactly is new relative to Refs. [18]–[23].
  5. [Section III] The manuscript reports a speed-up of 'exceeding three orders of magnitude' but the numbers given (40 minutes for 24,000 ABCD evaluations versus more than 2 hours for one HFSS run) suggest a much larger speed-up; please state the effective per-evaluation cost to avoid under- or over-statement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the target match is the explicit RMSE objective, and the load-bearing validation is the independent HFSS comparison.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is not circular. The only place where the output is made to equal the target is the GA fitness function: Eq. (1) minimizes RMSE between simulated and target S-parameters, so the ABCD-vs-target agreement shown in Fig. 4(a) is the optimization objective, not an independent prediction. The paper does not disguise this; it states in the Abstract that 'Optimization is guided by minimizing the root-mean-square error (RMSE) between simulated and target S-parameters.' The load-bearing validation is the FEM comparison: Fig. 4(c) 'compares the results predicted by the ABCD matrix method and full-wave electromagnetic simulations using ANSYS HFSS, showing strong agreement,' and Fig. 7 compares both methods for all tuned filters. HFSS is an independent solver and was not used in the GA loop, so this is an external check rather than a fitted input renamed as prediction. The CPS impedance formula (Eq. 7) is taken from Ghione and Naldi [28], an external source, and the prior experimental agreement of the ABCD approach is cited to Frankel et al. [27], also external. The paper's self-citations [10], [11] appear only as background and as a comparative benchmark ('Compared to conventional Bragg grating filters of similar spectral specifications [11]...'), not as a load-bearing uniqueness or ansatz argument. The admitted divergence of ABCD above 0.9 THz and the unspecified W/S extraction from arbitrary pixel columns are modeling-accuracy concerns, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on treating a complex 2-D pixel pattern as a chain of quasi-static transmission-line sections. This is a strong domain assumption, explicitly acknowledged by the authors to break down above 0.9 THz. The GA hyperparameters and loss weights are hand chosen, and no code or geometry data are provided, so independent reproduction would require re-implementing the method from the text.

free parameters (3)
  • Loss function weights w1-w4 = w3, w4 set to 10% of total; w1, w2 not specified
    Chosen by hand in Eq. (1); they shape which S-parameter components dominate optimization, yet no numeric values or sensitivity study are given.
  • GA hyperparameters (population, elite count, tournament size, mutation rate, generations) = 200, 30, 4, 10%, 120
    Selected via preliminary experiments and literature; they affect convergence but not the physical model.
  • Pixel size = 4 µm x 10 µm
    Chosen to balance resolution, fabrication feasibility, and cost; coarser pixels would prevent the demonstrated responses.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Each 10 µm column is a uniform quasi-static CPS transmission line section; dimensions are much smaller than the operating wavelength.
    Invoked in Eqs. (5)-(7); recognized as approximate, with divergence above 0.9 THz reported in Section III.
  • domain assumption CPS characteristic impedance is given by the closed-form quasi-static formula ZCPS = 120π/sqrt(εre) * K(k)/K(k'), with k = S/(S+2W).
    Eq. (7) from [28] assumes ideal geometry and ignores radiation, dispersion, finite metal thickness, and substrate details.
  • domain assumption Cascading ABCD matrices of isolated segments captures the response; junction discontinuities and cross-coupling between segments can be neglected.
    Eqs. (5)-(6) cascade uniform lines; no junction model is included.
  • ad hoc to paper Target phase response is linear and phase errors are weighted at 10% of total loss.
    Chosen for dispersion-sensitive THz applications; not derived from a physical requirement.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Genetic Algorithm-Based Inverse Design of Guided Wave Planar Terahertz Filters." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/G7LVUCPJ

@misc{pith2026250603372,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Genetic Algorithm-Based Inverse Design of Guided Wave Planar Terahertz Filters},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/G7LVUCPJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.03372}
}
read the original abstract

We present a genetic algorithm (GA)-based inverse design framework for synthesizing high-performance planar terahertz (THz) filters integrated with coplanar striplines (CPSs). The method efficiently explores high-dimensional design spaces to generate filter geometries matching user-defined S-parameter magnitude and phase responses, while enforcing structural connectivity for compatibility with terahertz system-on-chip (TSoC) platforms. To accelerate optimization, filter performance is evaluated using the ABCD matrix method, providing a significant computational advantage over full-wave simulations. Final validation is performed through finite element method (FEM) simulations. As a proof of concept, we design band-stop filters with center frequencies of 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 THz, each with a 150 GHz target bandwidth, and demonstrate tunable rejection depths within a constant physical footprint. Optimization is guided by minimizing the root-mean-square error (RMSE) between simulated and target S-parameters.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.03372 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flowchart of the GA optimization process. The randomly generated initial population of THz filters is depicted, along with their corresponding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustration of the design framework and associated parameters. (a) Example of a planar THz filter structure synthesized using a GA-based inverse [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Illustration of the two-point crossover mechanism employed in the GA-based inverse design of THz filters. This crossover process facilitates the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Calculated magnitude response of the planar band-stop filter’s S-parameters ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Electric field distribution of the inverse-designed planar band-stop filter at 0.6 THz, 0.8 THz, and 1.0 THz. The filter exhibits strong suppression [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (e) Evolutionary optimization process for the inverse-designed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of S-parameters of band-stop filters designed using the GA-based inverse design framework. (a) Filters with varying rejection depths [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Convergence behavior of the GA-based inverse design framework over 10 independent runs initialized with different random seeds. (a) Each ring marker [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Review of terahertz and subterahertz wireless communications,

    J. Federici and L. Moeller, “Review of terahertz and subterahertz wireless communications,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 107, no. 11, 2010

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Terahertz terabit wireless communication,

    K.-C. Huang and Z. Wang, “Terahertz terabit wireless communication,” IEEE microwave magazine , vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 108–116, 2011. IEEE TEMPLATE (PREPRINT) 10

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Terahertz communications and sensing for 6g and beyond: A comprehensive review,

    W. Jiang, Q. Zhou, J. He, M. A. Habibi, S. Melnyk, M. El-Absi, B. Han, M. Di Renzo, H. D. Schotten, F.-L. Luo et al. , “Terahertz communications and sensing for 6g and beyond: A comprehensive review,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Terahertz imaging and sensing for health- care: Current status and future perspectives,

    M. Gezimati and G. Singh, “Terahertz imaging and sensing for health- care: Current status and future perspectives,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 18 590–18 619, 2023

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Thz medical imaging: from in vitro to in vivo,

    Z. Yan, L.-G. Zhu, K. Meng, W. Huang, and Q. Shi, “Thz medical imaging: from in vitro to in vivo,” Trends in Biotechnology , vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 816–830, 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Applications of terahertz spectroscopy in the detection and recognition of substances,

    X. Fu, Y . Liu, Q. Chen, Y . Fu, and T. J. Cui, “Applications of terahertz spectroscopy in the detection and recognition of substances,” Frontiers in Physics, vol. 10, p. 869537, 2022

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Comparative terahertz study of rectangular metal waveguides with and without a ridge,

    M. Gerhard, R. Beigang, and M. Rahm, “Comparative terahertz study of rectangular metal waveguides with and without a ridge,” Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves, vol. 36, pp. 327–334, 2015

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Terahertz notch and low-pass filters based on band gaps properties by using metal slits in tapered parallel-plate waveguides,

    E. S. Lee, S.-G. Lee, C.-S. Kee, and T.-I. Jeon, “Terahertz notch and low-pass filters based on band gaps properties by using metal slits in tapered parallel-plate waveguides,” Optics express, vol. 19, no. 16, pp. 14 852–14 859, 2011

    work page 2011

Show all 29 references
  1. [9]

    Capacitively-coupled resonators for terahertz planar-goubau-line fil- ters,

    J. Cabello-S ´anchez, V . Drakinskiy, J. Stake, and H. Rodilla, “Capacitively-coupled resonators for terahertz planar-goubau-line fil- ters,” IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology , vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 58–66, 2022

    2022

  2. [10]

    Terahertz low-pass filter based on cascaded resonators formed by cps bending on a thin membrane,

    W. Gomaa, L. Smith, V . Shiran, and T. Darcie, “Terahertz low-pass filter based on cascaded resonators formed by cps bending on a thin membrane,” Optics Express, vol. 28, no. 21, pp. 31 967–31 978, 2020

    2020

  3. [11]

    Demonstration of a planar multimodal periodic filter at thz frequencies,

    A. Dehghanian, M. Haghighat, T. Darcie, and L. Smith, “Demonstration of a planar multimodal periodic filter at thz frequencies,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.10611, 2025

    2025

  4. [12]

    A tunable terahertz photonic crystal narrow-band filter,

    S. Li, H. Liu, Q. Sun, and N. Huang, “A tunable terahertz photonic crystal narrow-band filter,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 752–754, 2015

    2015

  5. [13]

    Terahertz band pass filter design using multilayer metamaterials,

    A. B. Asl, A. Rostami, and I. Amiri, “Terahertz band pass filter design using multilayer metamaterials,” Optical and Quantum Electronics , vol. 52, pp. 1–13, 2020

    2020

  6. [14]

    Metamaterial-inspired bandpass filters for terahertz surface waves on goubau lines,

    A. K. Horestani, W. Withayachumnankul, A. Chahadih, A. Ghaddar, M. Zehar, D. Abbott, C. Fumeaux, and T. Akalin, “Metamaterial-inspired bandpass filters for terahertz surface waves on goubau lines,” IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology , vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 851–...

    2013

  7. [15]

    Tunable terahertz metamaterial by using three-dimensional double split- ring resonators,

    Y .-S. Lin, S. Liao, X. Liu, Y . Tong, Z. Xu, R. Xu, D. Yao, and Y . Yu, “Tunable terahertz metamaterial by using three-dimensional double split- ring resonators,” Optics & Laser Technology , vol. 112, pp. 215–221, 2019

    2019

  8. [16]

    Tunable terahertz band-stop filter using strongly coupled split ring resonators integrated with on-chip waveguide,

    R. S. Parker-Jervis, S. J. Park, and J. E. Cunningham, “Tunable terahertz band-stop filter using strongly coupled split ring resonators integrated with on-chip waveguide,” Journal of Applied Physics , vol. 129, no. 5, 2021

    2021

  9. [17]

    Inverse design in nanophotonics,

    S. Molesky, Z. Lin, A. Y . Piggott, W. Jin, J. Vuckovi ´c, and A. W. Rodriguez, “Inverse design in nanophotonics,”Nature Photonics, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 659–670, 2018

    2018

  10. [18]

    Automatic and inverse design of broadband terahertz absorber based on optimization of genetic algorithm for dual metasurfaces,

    M. Zhang, N. Zhang, J. Zhang, X. Zhang, P. Dong, B. Wang, L. Yang, R. Wu, and W. Hou, “Automatic and inverse design of broadband terahertz absorber based on optimization of genetic algorithm for dual metasurfaces,” Optics Express, vol. 30, no. 13, pp. 22 974–22 985, 2022

    2022

  11. [19]

    Accurate inverse design for high-efficiency and broadband terahertz devices by co-simulation with genetic algorithms,

    M. Zhang, J. Zhang, C. Cui, P. Dong, B. Wang, L. Yang, and X. Zhang, “Accurate inverse design for high-efficiency and broadband terahertz devices by co-simulation with genetic algorithms,”Journal of the Optical Society of America B , vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 2674–2683, 2023

    2023

  12. [20]

    Applications of neural networks for spectrum prediction and inverse design in the terahertz band,

    J. Li, Y . Li, Y . Cen, C. Zhang, T. Luo, and D. Yang, “Applications of neural networks for spectrum prediction and inverse design in the terahertz band,” IEEE Photonics Journal , vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1–9, 2020

    2020

  13. [21]

    A reconfigurable graphene patch antenna inverse design at terahertz fre- quencies,

    M. Mashayekhi, P. Kabiri, A. S. Nooramin, and M. Soleimani, “A reconfigurable graphene patch antenna inverse design at terahertz fre- quencies,” Scientific Reports, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 8369, 2023

    2023

  14. [22]

    Deep-learning enabled generalized inverse design of multi-port radio-frequency and sub-terahertz passives and integrated circuits,

    E. A. Karahan, Z. Liu, A. Gupta, Z. Shao, J. Zhou, U. Khankhoje, and K. Sengupta, “Deep-learning enabled generalized inverse design of multi-port radio-frequency and sub-terahertz passives and integrated circuits,” Nature Communications, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 10734, 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    Metasurface inverse designed by deep learning for quasi-entire terahertz wave absorption,

    Z. Ding, W. Su, Y . Luo, L. Ye, W. Li, Y . Zhou, J. Zou, B. Tang, and H. Yao, “Metasurface inverse designed by deep learning for quasi-entire terahertz wave absorption,” Nanoscale, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1384–1393, 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    R. L. Haupt and D. H. Werner, Genetic algorithms in electromagnetics . John Wiley & Sons, 2007

    2007

  17. [25]

    Genetic algorithms, tournament selection, and the effects of noise,

    B. L. Miller, D. E. Goldberg et al. , “Genetic algorithms, tournament selection, and the effects of noise,” Complex systems, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 193–212, 1995

    1995

  18. [26]

    G. J. Rawlins, Foundations of Genetic Algorithms 1991 (FOGA 1) . Elsevier, 2014, vol. 1

    1991

  19. [27]

    Terahertz attenuation and dispersion characteristics of coplanar transmission lines,

    M. Y . Frankel, S. Gupta, J. A. Valdmanis, and G. A. Mourou, “Terahertz attenuation and dispersion characteristics of coplanar transmission lines,” IEEE Transactions on microwave theory and techniques , vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 910–916, 1991

    1991

  20. [28]

    Analytical formulas for coplanar lines in hybrid and monolithic MICs,

    G. Ghione and C. Naldi, “Analytical formulas for coplanar lines in hybrid and monolithic MICs,” Electronics letters , vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 179–181, 1984

    1984

  21. [29]

    D. M. Pozar, Microwave engineering: theory and techniques . John wiley & sons, 2021

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.