Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 49 references

Existence and stability of non-equilibrium steady states of a weakly non-linear kinetic Fokker-Planck equation in a domain

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that a weakly self-interacting kinetic Fokker-Planck gas confined to a bounded domain with heat thermostats at its walls has a positive non-equilibrium steady state that attracts nearby solutions exponentially.

desk verdict A serious and mostly honest extension of NESS results from the torus to bounded domains, but Theorem 1.3 has a real compactness gap in the Schauder step and the linear foundation is imported from an unreviewed companion preprint. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.03632 v2 pith:5ZYZ5ROO submitted 2025-06-04 math.AP

J Evans (WMI) , R Medina (CEREMADE) This is my paper
classification math.AP MSC 35Q8235Q8435G3135B4082C05
keywords kineticFokker-PlanckequationBGKthermostatMaxwellboundaryconditionsnon-equilibriumsteadystateexponentialstabilityKrein-Rutman-Doblin-Harrisultraparabolicoperator
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that a weakly self-interacting kinetic Fokker-Planck gas confined to a bounded domain with heat thermostats at its walls admits a positive non-equilibrium steady state that attracts nearby solutions exponentially. The non-equilibrium character comes from the boundary: the walls have a space-dependent temperature and accommodation coefficient, so no Maxwellian equilibrium exists. For every sufficiently small self-interaction strength $\alpha>0$ the authors construct a positive steady state $F_\alpha$ of mass one with energy at most $2E_{F_0}$, where $F_0$ is the steady state of the linear problem; initial data close to $F_\alpha$ in a weighted $L^2$ space converge to it with an exponential rate. If true, this provides one of the few rigorous examples of a stable non-equilibrium steady state in a genuine spatial domain with boundary thermostats.

What carries the argument

The central object is the semigroup $S_L$ generated by the linear operator $L = -v\cdot\nabla_x + \Lambda(x)\Delta_v + v\cdot\nabla_v + G$ with Maxwell boundary conditions, where $G$ is the BGK thermostat. The argument splits $L = B + A$ into a local ultraparabolic operator $B$ and a nonlocal BGK operator $A$; it imports from [16] the positivity, Harnack inequality, ultracontractivity, and spectral gap of $S_B$ and extends them to $S_L$ by iterated Duhamel formulas. The Krein-Rutman-Doblin-Harris theorem (Theorem 4.1 from [45]) then yields a unique normalized positive eigenfunction for the linear problem. The nonlinear existence proof uses the energy functional $E_f$ as a self-consistent temperature parameter and a fixed-point map $\nu \mapsto E_{F_\alpha^\nu}$; stability uses a modified weighted norm combining the $L^2_\omega$ norm with an integrated semigroup term to prove hypodissipativity of the perturbed equation.

What would settle it

Run a numerical spectral computation for the local ultraparabolic operator $B = -v\cdot\nabla_x + \Lambda(x)\Delta_v + v\cdot\nabla_v + (d - \sum_n \eta_n 1_{\Omega_n})$ in a slab with strongly varying boundary temperature and Maxwell boundary conditions: if the first eigenfunction is not strictly positive or the spectral gap vanishes, then the imported Theorem 2.2 is false and Theorems 1.1-1.3 collapse.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the nonlinear steady-state problem can be solved by a fixed point around the linear steady state $F_0$ of the $\alpha=0$ equation. For the linear equation with an arbitrary temperature profile $\Lambda(x)$, the paper first establishes a unique positive steady state and exponential convergence using a constructive Krein-Rutman-Doblin-Harris theorem. Then, treating the total energy $\nu \in [0,2E_{F_0}]$ as a parameter, it shows the map $\nu \mapsto E_{F_\alpha^\nu}$ is continuous and preserves this interval, so a fixed point $\nu_\star$ yields a steady state $F_\alpha$ of the nonlinear equation. Stability is obtained by writing $h = f - F_\alpha$, treating the nonlinear energy terms as a small perturbation of the linear semigroup, and constructing an equivalent norm in which the perturbed problem is hypodissipative; a Schauder fixed point then gives a global weak solution with exponential decay.

Load-bearing premise

If the local heat-diffusion semigroup in a bounded domain with Maxwell boundary conditions fails the Harnack inequality that this paper imports from an unreviewed companion preprint, the spectral gap and exponential convergence of the linear semigroup fail, and all three main theorems collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every sufficiently small $\alpha>0$, the nonlinear equation has a positive steady state $F_\alpha$ with mass one and energy at most $2E_{F_0}$.
  • Initial data within a weighted-$L^2$ ball around $F_\alpha$ produce global weak solutions that converge to $F_\alpha$ with an exponential rate independent of the initial data within the ball.
  • In the purely linear case $\alpha=0$, there is a unique steady state $F_0$ with velocity decay tails, and the semigroup converges to $F_0$ exponentially from all weighted-$L^2$ initial data.
  • The results apply to bounded $C^1$ domains with conservative Maxwell boundary conditions, including space-dependent accommodation and boundary temperature, so the steady state need not be spatially uniform.
  • The proof does not rely on an explicit formula for the steady state or on a full hypocoercivity theory; the exponential stability is obtained through an equivalent norm and fixed-point argument.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the proof uses only the energy functional as a self-consistent parameter, the same fixed-point scheme should extend to other self-consistent temperatures (e.g., local variance or entropy-based temperatures) within the same small-$\alpha$ regime, though the paper does not claim this.
  • The exponential rate $\eta$ and the smallness thresholds $\alpha_\star$ and $\alpha_{\star\star}$ are not explicit; a numerical study of the linear semigroup's spectral gap for realistic boundary temperature profiles could quantify how small $\alpha$ must be, a question the paper leaves open.
  • The dependence of the non-equilibrium steady state on the boundary temperature profile is a natural next test: computing $F_\alpha$ numerically for a slab with strongly varying boundary temperature $\Theta(x)$ would reveal whether the energy bound $2E_{F_0}$ is sharp and whether spatial inhomogeneity is significant.
  • The hypodissipativity technique of constructing an equivalent norm from the linear semigroup's decay could be transferred to other kinetic equations with nonlocal collision terms and boundary thermostats, such as weak Landau or BGK models, where explicit steady states are unavailable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the weakly nonlinear kinetic Fokker-Planck equation (1.1) with BGK heat thermostats and Maxwell boundary conditions with space-dependent accommodation coefficient and boundary temperature, on a bounded smooth domain with dimension d >= 3, for a self-interaction strength alpha in (0,1/2). The main results are: Theorem 1.1 (alpha = 0) gives existence, uniqueness, and exponential stability of a positive mass-one steady state F0 in weighted L2 spaces; Theorem 1.2 gives, for alpha in (0, alpha_*), existence of a positive steady state F_alpha with mass one, energy bound E_{F_alpha} <= 2E_{F0}, and velocity decay bounds; Theorem 1.3 gives, for alpha in (0, alpha_**) and initial data delta-close to F_alpha, a global weak solution converging exponentially to F_alpha in the weighted space L2_omega. The linear results combine the well-posedness and trace theory of [19] with the Krein-Rutman-Doeblin-Harris theorem of [45], whose hypotheses are verified using the Harnack inequality, eigentriplet positivity, and ultracontractivity inherited from the companion preprint [16]. The nonlinear steady state is built by a fixed point in the average-energy variable nu mapping to E[F^alpha_nu]; stability is proved by linearizing around F_alpha, obtaining hypodissipativity in an auxiliary norm, and closing with a Schauder fixed point.

Significance. If correct, the paper establishes, in a perturbative regime, the existence of non-equilibrium steady states and their exponential stability for a kinetic Fokker-Planck model with non-isothermal boundary thermostats in a bounded domain, extending [14] from the torus to domains with Maxwell boundary conditions, where no explicit NESS formula is available and spatial uniformity of the steady state cannot be expected. The manuscript is transparent about its strategy and its debts: the proofs are detailed, the smallness thresholds and rates are existential rather than fitted (no parameters are tuned), and the paper explicitly flags what it does not prove (no uniqueness of the nonlinear NESS, no lower positivity bounds, no hypocoercivity, no exclusion of infinite-energy steady states). Two structural weaknesses must be weighed: load-bearing positivity, Harnack, and spectral-gap results are imported from an unreviewed companion preprint with overlapping authorship, and the closing Schauder step in Proposition 8.1 is not valid as written. Neither appears fatal - both are plausibly repairable - but until they are addressed, the main theorems are not fully supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 8, Proposition 8.1] The assertion that Z := {g in L2_omega(U) : ||g_t||_{L2_omega(O)} <= epsilon3 for all t >= 0} is convex and compact in the weak topology induced by L2_omega(O) is false, and the subsequent application of Schauder's fixed point theorem is therefore unjustified. First, the defining condition does not by itself imply membership in L2_omega(U): a function with ||g_t|| = epsilon3 for all t is not square-integrable in time over (0, infinity). Second, even inside L2_omega(U), Z is not weakly compact: take phi in L2_omega(O) with ||phi|| = 1 and define g_n(t,x,v) = epsilon3 e^{-t/n} phi(x,v). Each g_n satisfies sup_t ||g_n(t)|| = epsilon3 and ||g_n||^2_{L2_omega(U)} = epsilon3^2 n/2 < infinity, so the defining conditions hold, but ||g_n||_{L2_omega(U)} tends to infinity with n. Since weakly convergent sequences in a Hilbert space are bounded, (g_n) has no weakly convergent subsequence in L2_omega(U); in the weak-* topology of L-infinity(R_+; L2_omega(O)) the limit is epsilon3 phi, which does not belong to L2_omega(U). Hence the existence of a fixed point of Phi is not obtained by the argument as written, and the existence part of Theorem 1.3 lacks proof. The repair (a fixed-point set with built-in time integrability or time-equicontinuity, using Aubin-Lions-type compactness, or a contraction argument in a weighted space) should be supplied before the claim is accepted.
  2. [Section 2.2 / Theorem 2.2; Section 4.2.2] The verification of the relaxed Doeblin-Harris condition (4.2) in Section 4.2.2 relies entirely on results imported without proof from the companion preprint [16] (Carrapatoso-Gabriel-Medina-Mischler, 2024), whose authors overlap with the present ones: the well-posedness and positivity of the local semigroup S_B, the ultracontractivity estimate (2.6), the Harnack-type inequality (2.7), and the positive eigentriplet (2.9). Theorem 1.1, and hence Theorems 1.2 and 1.3, collapses if any of these statements fails, yet Theorem 2.2 is presented as a summary of [16] without a theorem-by-theorem correspondence. In particular, the stated form of (2.7) (sup over O_epsilon at time T0 <= C inf over O_epsilon at time T1, with T0 < T1) is the reverse of the classical parabolic Harnack direction; while plausible on a bounded domain with mass normalization, this is exactly the statement that needs to be checked against the source. I recommend that the authors state precisely which results in [16] imply each item of Theorem 2.2, verify that the hypotheses (including the Maxwell boundary conditions and the admissible-weight framework) match, and note in the introduction the extent to which the main theorems depend on an unreviewed preprint. This is a completeness and verifiability concern, not a claim of an internal error.
  3. [Section 5.1.1, Lemma 5.1] The lemma as stated is not what its proof establishes. The a priori estimate (5.6) gives ||f_{2,t} - f_{1,t}||^2_{L2_omega} <= alpha^2 |nu1 - nu2|^2 C e^{kappa t} ||f0||^2_{L2_omega}, hence ||f_{2,t} - f_{1,t}|| <= alpha |nu1 - nu2| C e^{kappa t/2} ||f0||, with a single power of alpha and of |nu1 - nu2|; the displayed conclusion (5.3), with alpha^2 |nu1 - nu2|^2 on the right-hand side against a first-power left-hand side, does not follow and is not dimensionally consistent. Proposition 5.2 then uses the quadratic version to choose delta. The continuity of the map F in Proposition 5.2 can be recovered immediately with the corrected linear bound and a rescaled delta, so the fixed-point strategy for Theorem 1.2 survives, but the statement of Lemma 5.1 must be corrected.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 1] Several typos should be fixed, including 'outisde' for 'outside', 'The model is based from a problem' for 'based on', and, in Section 1.3, 'Whiting the previously mentioned papers' for 'Within'.
  2. [Proposition 7.2] The smallness hypothesis is written with the norm ||g_t||_{L-infinity_omega(O)}, but the proof and Proposition 8.1 use the norm ||g_t||_{L2_omega(O)}; the statement should be corrected to match the argument.
  3. [Section 3.2, proof of Theorem 3.3] In Step 1, the two successive displays both estimate |nabla_x theta| with identical left-hand sides but different right-hand sides; the second display should presumably estimate |nabla_v theta| instead.
  4. [Section 3.3, proof of Proposition 3.5] In Step 2.1, the notation 'e V2' in the concluding display is undefined and should read V2.
  5. [Sections 5.1.1 and 5.1.2] The decay constants lambda and C1 used for the semigroup generated by (5.1) with Lambda = alpha nu + (1 - alpha) tau are attributed to Theorem 1.1, which concerns Lambda = tau; Proposition 4.2 is the appropriate citation and already provides constants independent of alpha and nu.
  6. [Section 1.4] The boundary measure d xi^1_1 is used in the mass-conservation discussion before the measures d xi^j_omega are defined in Section 3.2; a forward reference would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the nonlinear steady state and its stability are obtained by fixed-point arguments over independent linear semigroup results, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained in the required sense. Section 5 constructs F_alpha as the fixed point of F(nu)=E F^alpha_nu, where F^alpha_nu is the linear steady state of (5.1) with thermostat temperature alpha nu+(1-alpha)tau; continuity (Proposition 5.2) and interval invariance (Proposition 5.3) are proved before the fixed-point theorem is invoked, so the identity E_{F_alpha}=nu_star is a proved consequence rather than an input. The stability argument likewise starts from the decay of the linear semigroup S_P of (7.1), which is an instance of the imported linear theory for the fixed coefficient Lambda_star, and then treats the perturbation term N_g via the new norm and explicit a priori estimates; no fitted constant is renamed as a prediction and the smallness thresholds are existential. Theorem 2.2 and Theorem 4.1 are parameter-free results about the local linear KFP operator and about general positive semigroups, respectively; they do not assume the existence or stability of the nonlinear NESS. Even though one of the cited sources ([16]) shares an author, that citation is not circular because the imported results have their own hypotheses and proofs and are independent of the target nonlinear claims. The only flagged concern, the compactness assertion for Z in Proposition 8.1, is an internal correctness or proof-gap issue, not a circularity. Accordingly, no circular step is present and the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on two imported external results: the local ultraparabolic semigroup theory from [16] (including Harnack inequality and spectral gap) and the general Krein-Rutman-Doblin-Harris theorem from [45]. These are not proved in this paper. The admissible-weight class and the domain and boundary hypotheses are explicit but restrict the scope. No numerical free parameters are fitted and no new physical entities are introduced; the NESS F_alpha is a proven object, not an assumed one.

free parameters (1)
  • smallness thresholds alpha_star, alpha_starstar, delta, and constants C, lambda, eta
    The theorems assert existence of positive thresholds and constants but provide no explicit numerical values. They are construction parameters in the proofs, not fitted to any data.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Local ultraparabolic operator theory from [16]: well-posedness, ultracontractivity, Harnack inequality, spectral gap for B with Maxwell boundary conditions.
    Stated as Theorem 2.2 without proof; the present paper repeats arguments from [16, Theorems 1.1, 1.2, 5.2, 6.1, Prop 4.10]. It is the foundation for positivity of S_B, the Harnack inequality used in (4.2), and the decay estimates.
  • standard math Krein-Rutman-Doblin-Harris theorem for conservative positive semigroups on Banach lattices.
    Quoted as Theorem 4.1 from [45, Theorem 6.1]. Used to prove unique steady state and exponential convergence for the linear semigroup S_L in Proposition 4.2.
  • domain assumption Admissible weight functions omega = <v>^k exp(zeta <v>^s) with s = 0 and k > d+1, or s in (0,1].
    This class ensures (1.5), the uniform bound on |nabla_v omega / omega|, which is essential for the nonlinearity estimates. The results are stated only for these weights, as described in Section 1.2.
  • domain assumption Bounded C^1 domain with distance function in W^{2,infty}, dimension d >= 3, |Omega| = 1, boundary temperature in W^{1,infty} with (1.3), and accommodation coefficient in C(diff Omega, [0,1]).
    These geometric and boundary-data hypotheses are used throughout, in particular in the modified-weight computations (3.19)-(3.20) and in the boundary trace estimates from [19]. They are stated explicitly in Section 1.1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Existence and stability of non-equilibrium steady states of a weakly non-linear kinetic Fokker-Planck equation in a domain." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5ZYZ5ROO

@misc{pith2026250603632,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Existence and stability of non-equilibrium steady states of a weakly non-linear kinetic Fokker-Planck equation in a domain},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5ZYZ5ROO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.03632}
}
read the original abstract

We study a weakly non-linear Fokker-Planck equation with BGK heat thermostats in a spatially bounded domain with conservative Maxwell boundary conditions, presenting a space-dependent accommodation coefficient and a space-dependent temperature on the spatial boundary. The model is based from a problem introduced in [E. A. Carlen, R. Esposito, J. L. Lebowitz, R. Marra, and C. Mouhot. Approach to the steady state in kinetic models with thermal reservoirs at different temperatures. J. Stat. Phys., 172(2):522--543, 2018] where the authors studied the properties of the non-equilibrium steady states for non-linear kinetic Fokker-Planck equations with BGK thermostats in the torus. We generalize those results for bounded domains using the recent results presented in [K. Carrapatoso, P. Gabriel, R. Medina, and S. Mischler. Constructive krein-rutman result for kinetic Fokker-Planck equations in a domain, 2024] for the study of general kinetic Fokker-Planck equations with Maxwell boundary conditions. More precisely, in a weakly non-linear regime, we obtain the existence of a non-equilibrium steady state and its stability in the perturbative regime. .

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [14]

    E. A. Carlen, R. Esposito, J. L. Lebowitz, R. Marra, and C. Mouhot. Approach to the steady state in kinetic models with thermal reservoirs at different temperatures. J. Stat. Phys. , 172(2):522–543, 2018

    work page 2018

  2. [16]

    Carrapatoso, P

    K. Carrapatoso, P. Gabriel, R. Medina, and S. Mischler. Constructive Krein-Rutman result for Kinetic Fokker-Planck equations in a domain, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [19]

    The Landau equation in a domain, 2024

    Kleber Carrapatoso and St´ ephane Mischler. The Landau equation in a domain, 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [45]

    On the voltage-conductance kinetic equation, 2024

    Claudia Fonte S´ anchez and St´ ephane Mischler. On the voltage-conductance kinetic equation, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [1]

    Exponential stability of the solutions to the Boltzmann equation for the Benard problem

    Leif Arkeryd, Raffaele Esposito, Rossana Marra, and Anne Nouri. Exponential stability of the solutions to the Boltzmann equation for the Benard problem. Kinet. Relat. Models , 5(4):673–695, 2012

    work page 2012

  6. [2]

    L1 solutions to the stationary Boltzmann equation in a slab

    Leif Arkeryd and Anne Nouri. L1 solutions to the stationary Boltzmann equation in a slab. Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. (6) , 9(3):375–413, 2000

    work page 2000

  7. [3]

    Beals and V

    R. Beals and V. Protopopescu. Abstract time-dependent transport equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 121(2):370–405, 1987

    work page 1987

  8. [4]

    A semigroup approach to the convergence rate of a collisionless gas

    Armand Bernou. A semigroup approach to the convergence rate of a collisionless gas. Kinet. Relat. Models, 13(6):1071–1106, 2020

    work page 2020

Show all 49 references
  1. [5]

    Asymptotic Behavior of Degenerate Linear Kinetic Equations With Non-isothermal Boundary Conditions

    Armand Bernou. Asymptotic Behavior of Degenerate Linear Kinetic Equations With Non-isothermal Boundary Conditions. December 2024

    2024

  2. [6]

    Hypocoercivity for kinetic linear equations in bounded domains with general Maxwell boundary condition

    Armand Bernou, Kleber Carrapatoso, St´ ephane Mischler, and Isabelle Tristani. Hypocoercivity for kinetic linear equations in bounded domains with general Maxwell boundary condition. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire, 40(2):287–338, 2023

    2023

  3. [7]

    Thermostatted kinetic equations as models for complex systems in physics and life sciences

    Carlo Bianca. Thermostatted kinetic equations as models for complex systems in physics and life sciences. Physics of Life Reviews , 9(4):359–399, 2012

    2012

  4. [8]

    Modelling pedestrian dynamics into a metro station by thermostatted kinetic theory methods

    Carlo Bianca and Caterina Mogno. Modelling pedestrian dynamics into a metro station by thermostatted kinetic theory methods. Math. Comput. Model. Dyn. Syst. , 24(2):207–235, 2018

    2018

  5. [9]

    F. Bouchut. Hypoelliptic regularity in kinetic equations. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) , 81(11):1135–1159, 2002

    2002

  6. [10]

    Ca˜ nizo and St´ ephane Mischler

    Jos´ e A. Ca˜ nizo and St´ ephane Mischler. Harris-type results on geometric and subgeometric convergence to equilibrium for stochastic semigroups. J. Funct. Anal. , 284(7):Paper No. 109830, 46, 2023

    2023

  7. [11]

    The kinetic Fokker-Planck equation with general force

    Chuqi Cao. The kinetic Fokker-Planck equation with general force. J. Evol. Equ. , 21(2):2293–2337, 2021

    2021

  8. [12]

    Carlen, R

    E. Carlen, R. Esposito, J. Lebowitz, R. Marra, and C. Mouhot. Uniqueness of the non-equilibrium steady state for a 1d BGK model in kinetic theory. Acta Appl. Math. , 169:99–124, 2020

    2020

  9. [13]

    Carlen, R

    E. Carlen, R. Esposito, J. L. Lebowitz, R. Marra, and A. Rokhlenko. Kinetics of a model weakly ionized plasma in the presence of multiple equilibria. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. , 142(3):193–218, 1998

    1998

  10. [15]

    Carlen, Joel L

    Eric A. Carlen, Joel L. Lebowitz, and Cl´ ement Mouhot. Exponential approach to, and properties of, a non-equilibrium steady state in a dilute gas. Braz. J. Probab. Stat. , 29(2):372–386, 2015

    2015

  11. [17]

    Carrapatoso and S

    K. Carrapatoso and S. Mischler. Landau equation for very soft and Coulomb potentials near Maxwellians. Ann. PDE, 3(1):Paper No. 1, 65, 2017

    2017

  12. [18]

    The Kinetic Fokker-Planck equation in a domain: Ultracontractivity, hypocoercivity and long-time asymptotic behavior

    Kleber Carrapatoso and St´ ephane Mischler. The Kinetic Fokker-Planck equation in a domain: Ultracontractivity, hypocoercivity and long-time asymptotic behavior. Preprint arXiv:2406.10112

    arXiv

  13. [20]

    Cauchy Problem and Exponential Stability for the Inhomogeneous Landau Equation

    Kleber Carrapatoso, Isabelle Tristani, and Kung-Chien Wu. Cauchy Problem and Exponential Stability for the Inhomogeneous Landau Equation. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis , 221(1):363–418, January 2016

    2016

  14. [21]

    Chandresekhar

    S. Chandresekhar. Stochastic problems in physics and astronomy. Rev. Modern Phys. , 15:1–89, 1943

    1943

  15. [22]

    Desvillettes and C

    L. Desvillettes and C. Villani. On the trend to global equilibrium in spatially inhomogeneous entropy- dissipating systems: the linear Fokker-Planck equation. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 54(1):1–42, 2001

    2001

  16. [23]

    Hitchhiker’s guide to the fractional Sobolev spaces

    Eleonora Di Nezza, Giampiero Palatucci, and Enrico Valdinoci. Hitchhiker’s guide to the fractional Sobolev spaces. Bull. Sci. Math. , 136(5):521–573, 2012

    2012

  17. [24]

    Hypocoercivity for linear kinetic equations conserving mass

    Jean Dolbeault, Cl´ ement Mouhot, and Christian Schmeiser. Hypocoercivity for linear kinetic equations conserving mass. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 367(6):3807–3828, 2015

    2015

  18. [25]

    Esposito, Y

    R. Esposito, Y. Guo, C. Kim, and R. Marra. Non-isothermal boundary in the Boltzmann theory and Fourier law. Comm. Math. Phys. , 323(1):177–239, 2013

    2013

  19. [26]

    Stationary solutions to the Boltzmann equation in the hydrodynamic limit

    Raffaele Esposito, Yan Guo, Chanwoo Kim, and Rossana Marra. Stationary solutions to the Boltzmann equation in the hydrodynamic limit. Ann. PDE, 4(1):Paper No. 1, 119, 2018

    2018

  20. [27]

    Existence of a nonequilibrium steady state for the nonlinear BGK equation on an interval

    Josephine Evans and Angeliki Menegaki. Existence of a nonequilibrium steady state for the nonlinear BGK equation on an interval. Pure Appl. Anal. , 3(1):223–252, 2021

    2021

  21. [28]

    Properties of Non-Equilibrium Steady States for the non-linear BGK equation on the torus, 2023

    Josephine Evans and Angeliki Menegaki. Properties of Non-Equilibrium Steady States for the non-linear BGK equation on the torus, 2023

    2023

  22. [29]

    On the Krein-Rutman theorem and beyond

    Claudia Fonte Sanchez, Pierre Gabriel, and St´ ephane Mischler. On the Krein-Rutman theorem and beyond. Preprint arXiv:2305.06652, 2024

    2024

  23. [30]

    Statistical mechanics

    Giovanni Gallavotti. Statistical mechanics. Texts and Monographs in Physics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999. A short treatise. 48 J. EV ANS AND R. MEDINA

    1999

  24. [31]

    Nonequilibrium and irreversibility

    Giovanni Gallavotti. Nonequilibrium and irreversibility . Theoretical and Mathematical Physics. Springer, Cham, 2014

    2014

  25. [32]

    Boltzmann Diffusive Limit with Maxwell Boundary condition, 2024

    Yan Guo, Junhwa Jung, and Fujun Zhou. Boltzmann Diffusive Limit with Maxwell Boundary condition, 2024

    2024

  26. [33]

    Mattingly

    Martin Hairer and Jonathan C. Mattingly. Yet another look at Harris’ ergodic theorem for Markov chains. In Seminar on Stochastic Analysis, Random Fields and Applications VI , volume 63 of Progr. Probab., pages 109–117. Birkh¨ auser/Springer Basel AG, Basel, 2011

    2011

  27. [34]

    Deterministic thermostats, theories of nonequilibrium systems and parallels with the ergodic condition

    Owen G Jepps and Lamberto Rondoni. Deterministic thermostats, theories of nonequilibrium systems and parallels with the ergodic condition. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical , 43(13):133001, mar 2010

    2010

  28. [35]

    J.-L. Lions. ´Equations diff´ erentielles op´ erationnelles et probl` emes aux limites. Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 111. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-G¨ ottingen-Heidelberg, 1961

    1961

  29. [36]

    Mellet and S

    A. Mellet and S. Mischler. Uniqueness and semigroup for the Vlasov equation with elastic-diffusive reflexion boundary conditions. Appl. Math. Lett. , 17(7):827–832, 2004

    2004

  30. [37]

    Mischler, C

    S. Mischler, C. Qui˜ ninao, and J. Touboul. On a kinetic Fitzhugh-Nagumo model of neuronal network.Comm. Math. Phys. , 342(3):1001–1042, 2016

    2016

  31. [38]

    On the initial boundary value problem for the Vlasov-Poisson-Boltzmann system.Comm

    St´ ephane Mischler. On the initial boundary value problem for the Vlasov-Poisson-Boltzmann system.Comm. Math. Phys. , 210(2):447–466, 2000

    2000

  32. [39]

    Kinetic equations with Maxwell boundary conditions

    St´ ephane Mischler. Kinetic equations with Maxwell boundary conditions. Ann. Sci. ´Ec. Norm. Sup´ er. (4), 43(5):719–760, 2010

    2010

  33. [40]

    On a linear runs and tumbles equation.Kinet

    St´ ephane Mischler and Qilong Weng. On a linear runs and tumbles equation.Kinet. Relat. Models, 10(3):799– 822, 2017

    2017

  34. [41]

    Morgado, L

    G. Morgado, L. Masurel, A. Lemarchand, and C. Bianca. Derivation of macroscopic equations from homogeneous thermostatted kinetic equations in the cancer-immune system competition. In Trends in biomathematics: stability and oscillations in environmental, social, and biological ...

    2022

  35. [42]

    Local and global minimizers for a variational energy involving a fractional norm

    Giampiero Palatucci, Ovidiu Savin, and Enrico Valdinoci. Local and global minimizers for a variational energy involving a fractional norm. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) , 192(4):673–718, 2013

    2013

  36. [43]

    A. Pazy. Semigroups of linear operators and applications to partial differential equations , volume 44 of Applied Mathematical Sciences. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1983

    1983

  37. [44]

    H. Risken. The Fokker-Planck equation, volume 18 ofSpringer Series in Synergetics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin,

  38. [46]

    Entropy production in nonequilibrium systems described by a Fokker-Planck equation

    Tˆ ania Tom´ e. Entropy production in nonequilibrium systems described by a Fokker-Planck equation. Brazilian Journal of Physics , 36(4a):1285–1289, Dec 2006

    2006

  39. [47]

    A review of mathematical topics in collisional kinetic theory

    C´ edric Villani. A review of mathematical topics in collisional kinetic theory. In Handbook of mathematical fluid dynamics, Vol. I , pages 71–305. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2002

    2002

  40. [48]

    Hypocoercivity.Mem

    C´ edric Villani. Hypocoercivity.Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. , 202(950):iv+141, 2009. (J. Evans) W arwick Mathematics Institute, Zeeman Building, University of W arwick, CV4 7AL Email address : Josephine.Evans@warwick.ac.uk (R. Medina) Centre de Recherche en Math ´ematiques de la D ...

    2009

  41. [1984]

    Methods of solution and applications

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.