Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Tunable Epsilon Near Zero Metamaterial with Rotating Obround-Shaped Meta-Atoms

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read By rotating pairs of obround-shaped rods, a microwave epsilon-near-zero metamaterial's plasma frequency is tuned 26% experimentally (29.1% in simulation), giving a mechanical tuning range far beyond natural ENZ materials.

desk verdict A mechanically tunable ENZ metamaterial with a genuine 26% experimental tuning range; the main weakness is that the plasma-frequency extraction leans on a finite-to-infinite mapping that isn't directly validated. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04428 v1 pith:27P4QUPS submitted 2025-06-04 physics.optics physics.app-phphysics.plasm-ph

Rustam Balafendiev , Gagandeep Kaur , Jim A. Enriquez , Gaganpreet Singh , Alexander J. Millar , Jon E. Gudmundsson , Pavel Belov This is my paper
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-phphysics.plasm-ph
keywords epsilon-near-zerometamaterialwiremediumplasmafrequencymechanicaltuningobroundcross-sectionmicrowavecavityhaloscope
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a microwave-range epsilon-near-zero (ENZ) metamaterial built from pairs of obround-shaped metal rods, and shows that rotating the rods shifts the material's plasma frequency. The authors report a tuning range of 26% measured in a copper cavity, inferred from the frequency of the fundamental TM110 mode, and 29.1% in simulations of the infinite periodic medium. Because the ENZ condition follows the plasma frequency, this gives a mechanically adjustable ENZ response far wider than that of natural optical materials. A sympathetic reader would take the central claim to be that changing the mutual inductance between paired non-circular rods is a practical, volume-preserving way to tune wire-media metamaterials in the microwave band.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the orientation-dependent mutual inductance of pairs of obround rods: in a wire medium with circular wires, rotation does not change the inductance, but with a non-circular cross-section it depends on how the rods are oriented relative to one another, and rotating paired obround rods from a strip-like configuration into close proximity changes the mutual inductance and therefore the effective plasma frequency. The experimental readout uses the cavity dispersion relation $k_res^{2}$ = $k_p^{2}$ + $k_y^{2}$ = $k_p^{2}$ + (pi/d)^2, justified by the near-flat Gamma-X dispersion of the infinite medium, to convert the measured TM110 resonance frequency into the plasma frequency. A fourth-order polynomial fit to the dispersion surfaces supplies the anisotropy coefficients $\alpha$ and $\beta$, and the approximation $\alpha$=0, $\beta$=1 is reported accurate to better than 0.5% for the fundamental mode.

What would settle it

Measure the cavity's TM110 resonance at finer angle steps, such as every 15 degrees, and for each angle compare the plasma frequency extracted with alpha=0, beta=1 against the value from a direct infinite-medium simulation at the same angle; deviation beyond the reported 0.5% at any unshown angle would break the dispersion assumption and require recomputing the 26% figure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core claim is that the plasma frequency of a wire medium can be tuned over a wide range by rotating paired rods with obround (rounded-rectangle) cross-sections. In the investigated geometry, the unit cell is a rectangle with width b=2a containing two rods of width w=0.45a and height 2r=0.25a, each rotating about an axis s=a/3 from the cell center; rotating both rods from 0 to 180 degrees changes the gap between their edges from 1.3a/6 to 0.1a/6 and moves the normalized plasma frequency k0 a/2pi from 0.484 down to 0.361. The result is reported as 29.1% tuning for the infinite medium and 26% for the experimental cavity, with the measured TM110 mode sweeping from 12.14 GHz down to 9.3 GHz. The paper also argues that tuning is largest when the rotational symmetry of the meta-atom matches the unit cell, and that extending the unit cell to two rotating elements enlarges the range beyond single-element designs.

Load-bearing premise

The 26% figure comes from a formula that treats the metamaterial as if its response depended on only one direction of the wave inside the cavity; if the anisotropy is stronger at rotation angles the paper did not show, the extracted plasma frequencies would be off.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A mechanically rotatable ENZ metamaterial with a 26% tuning range becomes available in the microwave band, where natural ENZ materials do not operate.
  • Rotating the rods tunes a cavity's fundamental TM110 mode between 9.3 GHz and 12.14 GHz, a frequency swing of about 28% that could be used in reconfigurable microwave resonators.
  • Because tuning happens by rotation rather than translation, the cavity volume is preserved, which is suited to operation at cryogenic temperatures or in high magnetic fields.
  • The combination of wire-medium cavities and rotating-element tuning gives a concrete route toward frequency-scanning plasma haloscopes for dark matter searches.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural scaling argument suggests the same mechanism would work at other frequencies: since the normalized plasma frequency depends only on geometry, shrinking the unit cell should push the tuning band upward and enlarging it downward, with the tuning percentage roughly preserved.
  • The mutual-inductance picture implies the tuning range could be extended further by increasing the eccentricity of the rods or optimizing the off-center distance s, since those choices control how much the inter-rod gap changes during rotation.
  • A testable extension would be measuring the full isofrequency contour at intermediate angles not tabulated here; if the Gamma-X section stays flat only near 0, 90, and 180 degrees, the extraction formula would need angle-dependent alpha and beta, which could shift the experimental 26% figure.
  • For the haloscope application, a practical next step is to rotate all rods synchronously inside a sealed cryogenic cavity and demonstrate continuous scanning across the 9-12 GHz band in one motion.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes and characterises a microwave-range epsilon-near-zero metamaterial whose plasma frequency is tuned by rotating pairs of obround-section metallic rods. Infinite-medium COMSOL eigenmode simulations give a 29.1% tuning range of the normalised plasma frequency. A 72×72×60 mm3 copper cavity containing a 3×6 array of unit cells is built, and S21 measurements at eight rotation angles show the TM110 resonance tuning from 9.3 to 12.14 GHz, with CST full-wave simulations agreeing within 1.38%. Using the anisotropic dispersion relation with α=0 and β=1 (Eq. 2), the authors convert measured and simulated resonance frequencies into plasma frequencies, reporting a 26% experimental tuning range. A survey of spoke-based unit cells is also presented.

Significance. If the inferred tuning is correct, the design offers a mechanically simple, continuous tuning mechanism for ENZ metamaterials with a range far larger than natural optical ENZ materials, with direct applications to tunable microwave devices and plasma-haloscope dark-matter detectors. The paper's strengths are the combination of theory, infinite-medium simulation, full-cavity simulation, and measurement, and the good quantitative agreement between CST and experiment. However, the central quantitative claim rests on an inferred plasma-frequency extraction whose finite-cavity validity is not demonstrated; this is fixable and does not undermine the basic physics.

major comments (2)
  1. [2.2, Eq. (2), Table 2] The conversion from measured resonance frequency to plasma frequency is validated only against COMSOL simulations of an infinite periodic medium. The experiment is performed in a finite 3×6 cavity, and no check is reported that applying Eq. (2) to the CST full-cavity TM110 frequencies reproduces the infinite-medium kp values. Since Eq. (2) is the load-bearing step for the 26% claim, please add this comparison for all eight angles, and quantify any angle-dependent bias. If the finite-cavity correction is nontrivial, the tuning percentage should be recomputed with that correction.
  2. [3.1, Figure 6] The reported 26% tuning percentage is quoted without uncertainty. The measured resonance frequencies deviate from CST by up to 1.38%, and the authors attribute part of the discrepancy to 50–100 µm axle-hole leeway. Please provide an uncertainty estimate for the inferred plasma frequencies, propagated from repeated measurements and from the spread in alignment, and quote the tuning range with a confidence interval. Without this, the difference between 26% and the simulated 29.1% is not meaningfully interpretable.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The statement that tunability of 26% is 'demonstrated both experimentally and numerically' is imprecise, because the experimental value is inferred from cavity resonances while the numerical value (29.1%) comes from an infinite-medium simulation. Please clarify the distinction.
  2. [2.1, Table 1] The claim that 'the tuning is largest when the symmetry of the metaatom matches that of the unit cell' is not consistent with Table 1: for the square cell the 8-spoked meta-atom shows only 1.43% tuning while the 4-spoked shows 11.74%, and for the hexagonal cell the 6-spoked meta-atom shows 0.01% while the 3-spoked shows 7.72%. Please clarify the intended symmetry condition or soften the statement.
  3. [2.1, Figure 3b] The phrase 'as the obround rods are rotated, the Γ point traces a curve' is misleading; the plotted quantity is the lowest-mode frequency at Γ, not the position of the Γ point. Please reword.
  4. [2.1, Figure 2] The obround (stadium) shape should be explicitly defined in the text, and the distances '1.3a/6' and '0.1a/6' in the figure caption would benefit from a short explanation of how they are measured.
  5. [Table 2] Please state explicitly that the 'Polynomial approximation' row is the reference for the quoted errors, and clarify how the coefficients α and β are obtained from the fourth-degree polynomial fits of the two dispersion cuts.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the 29.1% simulated and 26% experimental tuning claims are anchored in independent COMSOL eigenmode simulations and direct S21 measurements, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular in the sense prohibited by the review criteria. The numerical prediction (29.1% tuning) is obtained from COMSOL eigenmode simulations of an infinite periodic medium (Section 2.1, Figure 3), which directly compute the plasma frequency as a function of rotation angle. The experimental claim (26%) is based on direct VNA S21 measurements of the TM110 resonance frequency (Section 3.1, Figure 6). The conversion from measured k_res to k_p uses Eq. (2), k_res^2 = k_p^2 + (pi/d)^2, with alpha=0, beta=1. This approximation is justified in the paper by a separate COMSOL dispersion analysis (Table 2) rather than by fitting to the experimental resonance data; no parameter is extracted from the measured S21 spectra and then renamed a prediction. The cited equation from [44] is a previously published wire-medium cavity result, and the paper augments it with an explicit anisotropy correction, so the self-citation does not smuggle in the conclusion. The agreement between CST simulations and measurement (largest deviation 1.38%) confirms the measured resonance frequencies; the remaining model-dependence of the kp extraction (finite 3x6 cavity versus infinite medium) is a correctness and robustness concern, not a circularity, because the extraction formula is not statistically forced by the data.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. Its central claim rests on hand-chosen geometric parameters (rod width, height, axis offset) and on the effective-medium dispersion relation for wire-medium cavities taken from prior work (Eq. 2). The alpha,beta anisotropy coefficients are fitted to simulation but only support the approximation used for plasma-frequency extraction; they are not used to fit the claimed 26% tuning range.

free parameters (4)
  • Obround rod width w = 0.45a
    Hand-chosen design parameter (Section 2.1, Figure 2a). The tuning magnitude depends on it, but it is not fit to a target result.
  • Obround rod height 2r = 0.25a
    Hand-chosen design parameter. Controls the change in mutual inductance as the rods rotate.
  • Rotation axis offset s = a/3
    Hand-chosen offset from the unit-cell center; determines how closely the rods approach at theta=180 degrees.
  • Anisotropy coefficients alpha(theta), beta(theta) = Vary with angle; see Table 2
    Obtained by 4th-degree polynomial fits to COMSOL dispersion surfaces. They are used only to validate the alpha=0, beta=1 approximation for converting resonance frequency to plasma frequency, not to fit the claimed tuning range.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Effective-medium dispersion relation for the anisotropic wire-medium cavity (Eq. 2: k_res^2 = k_p^2 + alpha*k_x^2 + beta*k_y^2)
    Inherited and extended from the authors' earlier work [44]; assumes the cavity mode is described by a homogeneous anisotropic permittivity with wavevectors quantized by the cavity dimensions. The alpha=0, beta=1 limit is numerically validated in Table 2.
  • domain assumption Infinite periodic medium simulations represent the finite 3x6 rod-loaded cavity
    The dispersion curves and plasma frequency are computed for an infinite periodic unit cell, while the experiment is a finite 18-cell cavity. The CST simulation of the full prototype matches the VNA data, giving support, but edge effects are not separately quantified.
  • domain assumption The TM110 resonance maps one-to-one to the plasma frequency over the full rotation range
    No mode crossing or hybridization is reported within the tuning band (Figure 7). This one-to-one mapping is required to invert Eq. (2) and to interpret the measured resonance tuning as plasma-frequency tuning.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tunable Epsilon Near Zero Metamaterial with Rotating Obround-Shaped Meta-Atoms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/27P4QUPS

@misc{pith2026250604428,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tunable Epsilon Near Zero Metamaterial with Rotating Obround-Shaped Meta-Atoms},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/27P4QUPS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04428}
}
read the original abstract

A new design of a microwave-range ENZ metamaterial consisting of rods with an obround cross-section is proposed. The plasma frequency of the metamaterial can be tuned by rotating the constituent meta-atoms. Tunability of the plasma frequency by 26% is demonstrated both experimentally and numerically. The observed tuning range is dramatically higher than in the one observed in natural materials at optical range.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04428 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Normalised plasma frequency as a function of the angle of rotation of the metaatom for two unit cells: square (left) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. a) A single unit cell of the proposed metamaterial with periods a and b. The wires have a height of 2r and a width of w and are rotated around the axis s = a/3 away from the center by the angle θ. b) Several configurations of the unit cell for different values of θ. We used COMSOL Multiphysics’ frequency solver to calculate the dispersive characteristics for the lowest mode of the proposed metamaterial. It is import… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. a) Dispersion curves of the proposed metamaterial at several values of the rotation angle θ. The frequency scale in abso￾lute units on the right side of the plots corresponds to the unit cell dimensions used in the experiment in Section 3.1. The MYΓXM path corresponds to the movement along the edges of the Brillouin zone (shown in the inset). Notice the relative lack of change of frequency along the ΓX section. b) N… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Experimental prototype of the obround rod-based resonator. (a) Eccentric obround rods at 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Electric field norm distribution of the TM110 resonant mode in XY cross section. The obround rods are rotated at (a) 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: S21 spectra as obtained from 3D simulations in CST and VNA measurements for eight rotation angles of the rods. The spec￾trum corresponding to 0◦ rotation angle is shown with exact vertical scale whereas each of the following spectra is offset by −θ/60. The red curve on…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: a) Fundamental mode frequency surfaces within the first Brillouin zone for the cases of five rotation angles. Solid lines map out the frequencies corresponding to the quantized wave vector components of the first few TM modes of the cavity used in the exper￾iment. b) D…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tuning Plasma Frequency of Nested Wire Media

    physics.class-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5 of 10

    Breathing deformation of C6 and C4 nested wire media yields plasma-frequency tunability exceeding 80% and 60%, confirmed by a general thin-wire local-field model and full-wave numerics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Kinsey, C

    N. Kinsey, C. DeVault, A. Boltasseva, V. M. Shalaev, Nature Reviews Materials 2019, 4, 12 742

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Silveirinha, N

    M. Silveirinha, N. Engheta, Physical Review Letters 2006, 97, 15 157403, publisher: American Physical Society

    work page 2006

  3. [3]

    D. A. Powell, A. Alù, B. Edwards, A. Vakil, Y. S. Kivshar, N. Engheta, Physical Review B 2009, 79, 24 245135, publisher: American Physical Society

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    D. C. Adams, S. Inampudi, T. Ribaudo, D. Slocum, S. Vangala, N. A. Kuhta, W. D. Goodhue, V. A. Podolskiy, D. Wasserman, Physical Review Letters 2011, 107, 13 133901, publisher: American Physical Society

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    Enoch, G

    S. Enoch, G. Tayeb, P. Sabouroux, N. Guérin, P. Vincent, Physical Review Letters 2002, 89, 21 213902, publisher: American Physical Society

    work page 2002

  6. [6]

    A. Alù, M. G. Silveirinha, A. Salandrino, N. Engheta, Physical Review B 2007, 75, 15 155410, publisher: American Physical Society

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    J. Kim, A. Dutta, G. V. Naik, A. J. Giles, F. J. Bezares, C. T. Ellis, J. G. Tischler, A. M. Mahmoud, H. Caglayan, O. J. Glembocki, A. V. Kildishev, J. D. Caldwell, A. Boltasseva, N. Engheta, Optica 2016, 3, 3 339, publisher: Optica Publishing Group

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Fomra, A

    D. Fomra, A. Ball, S. Saha, J. Wu, M. Sojib, A. Agrawal, H. J. Lezec, N. Kinsey, Applied Physics Reviews 2024, 11, 1 011317

    work page 2024

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    G. V. Naik, V. M. Shalaev, A. Boltasseva, Advanced Materials 2013, 25, 24 3264

    2013

  2. [10]

    J. H. Ni, W. L. Sarney, A. C. Leff, J. P. Cahill, W. Zhou, Scientific Reports 2020, 10, 1 713, publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2020

  3. [11]

    Z. Wang, C. Chen, K. Wu, H. Chong, H. Ye, physica status solidi (a) 2019, 216, 5 1700794

    2019

  4. [12]

    Rotman, IRE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 1962, 10, 1 82, conference Name: IRE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation

    W. Rotman, IRE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 1962, 10, 1 82, conference Name: IRE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation

    1962

  5. [13]

    Suresh, O

    S. Suresh, O. Reshef, M. Z. Alam, J. Upham, M. Karimi, R. W. Boyd, ACS Photonics 2021, 8, 1 125, publisher: American Chemical Society

    2021

  6. [14]

    Genchi, I

    D. Genchi, I. G. Balasa, T. Cesca, G. Mattei, Physical Review Applied 2021, 16, 6 064020, publisher: American Physical Society

    2021

  7. [15]

    E. J. R. Vesseur, T. Coenen, H. Caglayan, N. Engheta, A. Polman, Physical Review Letters 2013, 110, 1 013902, publisher: American Physical Society

    2013

  8. [16]

    Edwards, A

    B. Edwards, A. Alù, M. E. Young, M. Silveirinha, N. Engheta, Physical Review Letters 2008, 100, 3 033903, publisher: American Physical Society

    2008

  9. [17]

    Bagheri, C

    S. Bagheri, C. M. Zgrabik, T. Gissibl, A. Tittl, F. Sterl, R. Walter, S. D. Zuani, A. Berrier, T. Stauden, G. Richter, E. L. Hu, H. Giessen, Optical Materials Express 2015, 5, 11 2625, publisher: Optica Publishing Group

    2015

  10. [18]

    Popović, M

    M. Popović, M. Novaković, E. Schmidt, P. Schöppe, N. Bibić, C. Ronning, Z. Rakočević, Optical Materials 2017, 72 775

    2017

  11. [19]

    Patsalas, N

    P. Patsalas, N. Kalfagiannis, S. Kassavetis, G. Abadias, D. V. Bellas, C. Lekka, E. Lidorikis, Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports 2018, 123 1

    2018

  12. [20]

    Patsalas, Thin Solid Films 2019, 688 137438

    P. Patsalas, Thin Solid Films 2019, 688 137438

    2019

  13. [21]

    Park, J.-H

    J. Park, J.-H. Kang, X. Liu, M. L. Brongersma, Scientific Reports 2015, 5, 1 15754, publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2015

  14. [22]

    Y. Ma, F. Liu, H. Pan, H. Zhang, S. Yan, A. Zhang, International Journal of Thermal Sciences 2024, 197 108795

    2024

  15. [23]

    K. Zhou, Q. Cheng, J. Song, L. Lu, Z. Jia, J. Li, Applied Optics 2018, 57, 1 102, publisher: Optica Publishing Group

    2018

  16. [24]

    J. P. Turpin, J. A. Bossard, K. L. Morgan, D. H. Werner, P. L. Werner, International Journal of Antennas and Propagation 2014, 2014, 1 429837

    2014

  17. [25]

    Brown, Progress in Dielectrics 1960, 2, 2 195

    J. Brown, Progress in Dielectrics 1960, 2, 2 195

    1960

  18. [26]

    J. B. Pendry, A. J. Holden, D. J. Robbins, W. J. Stewart, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 1998, 10, 22 4785

    1998

  19. [27]

    P. A. Belov, R. Marqu\'es, S. I. Maslovski, I. S. Nefedov, M. Silveirinha, C. R. Simovski, S. A. Tretyakov, Physical Review B 2003, 67 113103

    2003

  20. [28]

    N.-H. Shen, P. Zhang, T. Koschny, C. M. Soukoulis, Phys. Rev. B 2016, 93, 24 245118, publisher: American Physical Society

    2016

  21. [29]

    Jafargholi, M

    A. Jafargholi, M. H. Mazaheri, IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 2015, 9, 14 1612

    2015

  22. [30]

    A. H. Abdelgwad, T. M. Said, International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering 2019, 29, 5 e21557, publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

    2019

  23. [31]

    M. A. Gorlach, M. Song, A. P. Slobozhanyuk, A. A. Bogdanov, P. A. Belov, physica status solidi (RRL) – Rapid Research Letters 2016, 10, 12 900

    2016

  24. [32]

    Yang, Y.-J

    Y.-J. Yang, Y.-J. Huang, G.-J. Wen, J.-P. Zhong, H.-B. Sun, O. Gordon, Chinese Physics B 2012, 21, 3 038501

    2012

  25. [33]

    Ivzhenko, E

    L. Ivzhenko, E. Odarenko, S. I. Tarapov, Prog. Electromagn. Res. Lett. 2016, 64 93

    2016

  26. [34]

    Kowitt, R

    N. Kowitt, R. Balafendiev, D. Sun, M. Wooten, A. Droster, M. A. Gorlach, K. van Bibber, P. A. Belov, Phys. Rev. Appl. 2023, 20 044051

    2023

  27. [35]

    Lawson, A

    M. Lawson, A. J. Millar, M. Pancaldi, E. Vitagliano, F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 123 141802

    2019

  28. [36]

    A. J. Millar, S. M. Anlage, R. Balafendiev, P. Belov, K. van Bibber, J. Conrad, M. Demarteau, A. Droster, K. Dunne, A. G. Rosso, J. E. Gudmundsson, H. Jackson, G. Kaur, T. Klaesson, N. Kowitt, M. Lawson, A. Leder, A. Miyazaki, S. Morampudi, H. V. Peiris, H. S. Røising, G. Sing...

    2023

  29. [37]

    Boutan, M

    C. Boutan, M. Jones, B. H. LaRoque, N. S. Oblath, R. Cervantes, N. Du, N. Force, S. Kimes, R. Ottens, L. J. Rosenberg, G. Rybka, J. Yang, G. Carosi, N. Woollett, D. Bowring, A. S. Chou, R. Khatiwada, A. Sonnenschein, W. Wester, R. Bradley, E. J. Daw, A. Agrawal, A. V. Dixit, J...

    2018

  30. [38]

    Zhong, S

    L. Zhong, S. Al Kenany, K. M. Backes, B. M. Brubaker, S. B. Cahn, G. Carosi, Y. V. Gurevich, W. F. Kindel, S. K. Lamoreaux, K. W. Lehnert, S. M. Lewis, M. Malnou, R. H. Maruyama, D. A. Palken, N. M. Rapidis, J. R. Root, M. Simanovskaia, T. M. Shokair, D. H. Speller, I. Urdinar...

    2018

  31. [39]

    B. T. McAllister, A. P. Quiskamp, M. E. Tobar, Phys. Rev. D 2024, 109 015013

    2024

  32. [40]

    J. Golm, J. M. García-Barceló, S. Calatroni, W. Wuensch, B. Döbrich, Mechanical tuning of a rectangular axion haloscope operating around 8.4 ghz, 2023

    2023

  33. [41]

    Braggio, G

    C. Braggio, G. Carugno, R. Di Vora, A. Ortolan, G. Ruoso, D. Seyler, Review of Scientific Instruments 2023, 94, 4 045111

    2023

  34. [42]

    Jeong, S

    J. Jeong, S. Youn, S. Bae, J. Kim, T. Seong, J. E. Kim, Y. K. Semertzidis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 125 221302

    2020

  35. [43]

    S. Bae, S. Youn, J. Jeong, Phys. Rev. D 2023, 107 015012

    2023

  36. [44]

    Balafendiev, C

    R. Balafendiev, C. Simovski, A. J. Millar, P. Belov, Physical Review B 2022, 106 75106

    2022

  37. [45]

    Sakhno, R

    D. Sakhno, R. Balafendiev, P. A. Belov, Phys. Rev. B 2024, 110 L140303

    2024

  38. [46]

    H. Li, Z. Zhou, Y. He, W. Sun, Y. Li, I. Liberal, N. Engheta, Nature Communications 2022, 13, 1 3568, publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2022

  39. [47]

    Sikivie, Phys

    P. Sikivie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1983, 51 1415

    1983

  40. [48]

    , " * write output.state after.block =

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter edition editor eid howpublished institution isbn issn journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url volume year label INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCT...

  41. [49]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.