Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 53 references

Viral Hitchhikers and Macroevolution: A Novel Hypothesis on Explosive Speciation

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes that endogenous viral elements acquired from dinosaurs through scavenging at the K-Pg boundary catalyzed explosive speciation in boreoeutherian mammals, the clade that gave rise to most living placentals.

desk verdict A well-written speculation about dinosaur-virus-driven mammalian radiation whose keystone synchrony step is biologically implausible as stated. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04511 v1 pith:W7W4A6DD submitted 2025-06-04 q-bio.PE

Mario E. Lozano , Marcela G. Pilloff This is my paper
classification q-bio.PE
keywords endogenousviralelementsK-Pgmassextinctionadaptiveradiationpunctuatedequilibriumspeciationhorizontaltransferretrovirusessyncytins
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the explosive radiation of boreoeutherian mammals—the clade containing most living placental orders—after the K-Pg extinction was triggered by endogenous viral elements (EVEs), viral DNA stably integrated into host germlines, acquired horizontally from dinosaurs. The key move is to treat EVEs not as inert molecular fossils but as active speciation agents: their site-specific insertions can rearrange chromosomes, supply exapted genes and regulatory elements, and, because viral outbreaks infect many individuals at once, create the same genomic change in both sexes of a small population in one generation. That synchrony, the paper claims, can produce a reproductively isolated group that becomes a new species immediately, bypassing the fitness valley that makes single-individual chromosome changes unlikely to spread. The paper is a theoretical proposal—its data statement says no new data were generated—so the payoff is a set of testable predictions linking ancient viral epidemics to macroevolution.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the viral outbreak as a synchronizing speciation device. The paper assembles three ingredients that together make a speciation event: (1) EVEs integrating at specific sites where they can disrupt or rearrange chromosomes or donate regulatory sequences; (2) 'epidemiological synchrony,' meaning the same compatible integration events appear in most individuals of both sexes within one small population, which is what allows a new species to be founded without crossing a fitness valley; and (3) an ecological transmission window, here the K-Pg carrion event, that brings viruses from one vertebrate class into contact with a new host class. Two concrete objects carry the biological argument: the RnERV-K8e retrovirus family in rats, which shows ongoing insertional polymorphism and transfer between rats and mice, and syncytins, retroviral envelope genes captured independently in multiple mammalian lineages to drive placental cell fusion—the paper's paradigm of viral exaptation for a reproductive innovation.

What would settle it

The claim would be falsified by a comparative genomic screen showing that EVE insertions shared between birds/reptiles and boreoeutherians are all older than 66 Ma or fully explained by vertical inheritance, or by a population-genetic calculation showing that the probability of simultaneous compatible reproductive-cell integrations in both sexes is effectively zero for plausible outbreak sizes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the post-K-Pg mammalian radiation was accelerated by germline integration of viruses that jumped from sauropsid hosts (non-avian dinosaurs) to small scavenging boreoeutherian ancestors. Scavenging on dinosaur carrion during the mass extinction gave mammals first-time access to dinosaur viruses; some of those viruses infected germ cells, integrated at conserved genomic sites, induced chromosomal rearrangements, and provided exaptable material with new metabolic or regulatory functions. For a new species to emerge, the paper requires the outbreak to hit multiple individuals of both sexes with compatible integrations at the same time and place, so that the first generation of the new population already shares its distinctive genome. This 'quantum leap' concept is explicitly opposed to gradual models in which incompatible mutations accumulate slowly in isolated populations, and it is offered as a complement, not a replacement, to ecological explanations based on vacant niches.

Load-bearing premise

The whole argument depends on one premise: during a single viral outbreak, most infected individuals of both sexes in a small population receive the same compatible, speciation-relevant genetic insertions in their reproductive cells at roughly the same time; without that synchrony, the shared genomic change that creates a new species cannot arise.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Comparative genomics should find EVE insertions shared between sauropsids and boreoeutherians whose ages cluster near 66 Ma and whose phylogenetic distribution indicates horizontal transfer rather than vertical inheritance.
  • Paleovirological analysis of Paleocene mammal fossils should recover ERV insertions dating to the origin of major placental orders.
  • Epidemiological simulations of retroviral spread in small post-extinction populations should show that one-generation, both-sex germline integration at conserved sites is plausible.
  • Independent syncytin capture events should be traceable in each rapidly radiating placental lineage, while lineages such as Xenarthra and Cetacea should be explainable by alternative fusogens rather than by lack of opportunity.
  • Sauropsid and boreoeutherian genomes should show signatures of selection acting on EVE loci shared across the class boundary, consistent with functional exaptation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the synchrony mechanism is general, other mass extinction boundaries (not just K-Pg) should be followed by detectable EVE colonization waves in surviving clades; the paper only develops the K-Pg case.
  • The hypothesis implies a distinctive genomic signature that can be tested without fossils: EVE insertions shared by mammalian orders should be enriched at the breakpoints of conserved chromosomal rearrangements that distinguish those orders.
  • Quantitatively, the probability of speciation-compatible integration should depend steeply on effective population size and outbreak duration, predicting that EVE ages will cluster in small founder populations more than in large ones.
  • The argument also predicts a negative control: in lineages that never passed through a K-Pg-style scavenging window, such as fully aquatic clades, EVE-mediated speciation signals should be absent or systematically different.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that endogenous viral elements (EVEs) acquired by ancestral boreoeutherian mammals from dinosaur carcasses during the K-Pg mass extinction acted as genomic catalysts for explosive post-extinction speciation. It argues that EVEs can generate genetic novelty and chromosomal rearrangements, that viral outbreaks can synchronously modify multiple individuals, and that the K-Pg ecological crisis created a unique cross-class transmission window. The paper supports the hypothesis with examples of EVE exaptation (syncytins, Fv1), insertional polymorphisms (RnERV-K8e), and bornavirus-like elements, and offers several testable predictions for comparative genomics and paleovirology.

Significance. If established, the hypothesis would provide a unifying molecular mechanism for rapid adaptive radiations, linking virology, paleovirology, and macroevolution, and would extend symbiogenesis theory to transient viral interactions. The manuscript is valuable as a clearly written speculative framework: it is transparent about its speculative status, organizes a large body of literature on EVE biology, and articulates concrete, falsifiable predictions. However, the paper provides no new data, no quantitative model, and the central synchrony assumption is currently unsupported by any direct observational or experimental evidence. The hypothesis may stimulate useful research even though the specific mechanism as stated is implausible.

major comments (3)
  1. [EVEs as Speciation Catalysts (property 3) / The K-Pg Transmission Window] The synchrony requirement is the load-bearing step, but the paper provides no evidence that multiple individuals can acquire identical germline insertions at the same locus. Property 3 requires that 'most infected individuals' receive 'identical genetic modifications' at 'conserved integration sites' in both sexes, and 'The K-Pg Transmission Window' repeats that the virus had to 'integrate into germ cells of multiple individuals from both genders, target specific genomic sites.' Retroviral integration is semi-random, with bias toward active chromatin or gene bodies rather than sequence-specific insertion; therefore parallel de novo insertions at the same nucleotide position in a founding male and female are astronomically unlikely. The RnERV-K8e example (ref. 22) actually shows insertional polymorphisms at different sites among rat strains, not identical parallel insertions. The manuscript's phrase 'EVEs integrate at specific sites' conflates integration-site bias with sequence-specific insertion. Because the hypothesis explicitly requires identical modifications to found a new species in one generation, this unsupported assumption undermines the central claim as stated.
  2. [Mechanistic Evidence / Concluding remarks] No cited example demonstrates that EVE insertions cause speciation. The examples in 'Mechanistic Evidence' (syncytin exaptation, Fv1, RnERV-K8e insertional polymorphisms) show genomic and phenotypic effects, but none establish reproductive isolation or the emergence of a new species. The temporal coincidence of EBL integrations with the K-Pg boundary (refs. 19, 28) is at best a correlation, and the manuscript does not exclude alternative explanations such as population structure or ecological opportunity. The causal chain from dinosaur virus to mammalian radiation is therefore asserted rather than demonstrated. Since the paper's title and core hypothesis are specifically about speciation, this missing link is not a minor gap.
  3. [The Puzzle of Explosive Speciation / Outstanding Questions] The manuscript states that speciation requires the two conditions of substantial genomic change and synchronous population-wide effects, but provides no quantitative or population-genetic model assessing the probability that both conditions are met. The authors themselves describe the sequence of events as 'unlikely' in 'The K-Pg Transmission Window' and list an epidemiological model as an open question (Outstanding Question 4). Until such a model is provided, or at least an order-of-magnitude estimate of the probability of parallel compatible insertions, the hypothesis is not falsifiable in its current form. This is a load-bearing omission because the synchrony condition is what distinguishes the proposed mechanism from ordinary TE-mediated genome evolution.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Core hypothesis] The sentence 'This hipothesis integrates evolution, virology and paleogenomics' contains a typographical error: 'hipothesis' should be 'hypothesis'.
  2. [A Cross-Class Trigger] The phrase 'significative phenotypic variation' should be 'significant phenotypic variation'.
  3. [EVEs as Drivers of Genomic Innovation] The phrase '4 12 recently active ERVs' has a stray space and likely should read '412 recently active ERVs'.
  4. [EVEs as Drivers of Genomic Innovation] The clause 'insertion polymorphisms that are later fixed or disappears' has a subject-verb agreement error; 'disappears' should be 'disappear'.
  5. [Mechanistic Evidence] The protein name 'centrobina' appears to be a misspelling; the protein encoded by Cntrob is canonically called 'centrobin'.
  6. [References] Reference 20 has the DOI '0.1146/annurev-virology-100114-054945', which is missing the '10.' prefix and should be '10.1146/annurev-virology-100114-054945'.
  7. [The Puzzle of Explosive Speciation] The text 'gradual ist models' contains an erroneous space; it should read 'gradualist models'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the hypothesis is assembled from independent cited examples and explicitly labeled speculative; no prediction reduces to its inputs by construction.

full rationale

The paper proposes that horizontally transferred endogenous viral elements (EVEs) acted as catalysts for post-K-Pg mammalian speciation. The derivation chain is not circular: it assembles independent empirical precedents (e.g., cichlid SINE-associated radiation, syncytin exaptation, RnERV-K8e insertional polymorphisms) from external laboratories, and then explicitly frames the dinosaur-to-mammal transmission scenario as a hypothesis requiring multiple conditions to be met simultaneously. There are no fitted parameters, no equations, and no self-citation chain carrying the argument. The central synchrony requirement—that viral outbreaks produce identical germline integrations in both sexes—is asserted as a necessary condition rather than derived from the cited examples; this is an evidentiary weakness (the assumption is unsupported), not a circular reduction. The paper even labels its own predictions as testable and speculative, and the Outstanding Questions box openly asks how outbreaks could synchronize speciation-compatible genomic changes. Because the conclusion is not equivalent to its inputs by construction, and because no load-bearing self-citation or renamed known result is used to force the outcome, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central hypothesis rests on four unverified biological and historical assumptions: EVE-induced rearrangements cause speciation, outbreak synchrony can modify many germlines at once, dinosaur viruses could transfer to mammals at K-Pg, and compatible changes would appear in both sexes. No free parameters or new entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Endogenous viral elements can induce chromosomal rearrangements and reproductive isolation.
    Invoked as property 2 of EVEs in 'EVEs as Speciation Catalysts', citing Kazazian (2004) and Widen et al. (2023). The cited works show genomic and fitness effects, but not actual speciation events.
  • ad hoc to paper During a viral outbreak, many infected individuals can acquire identical germline integrations simultaneously.
    Central to the synchrony argument in 'EVEs as Speciation Catalysts', property 3. No direct observation is cited for this population-scale phenomenon.
  • ad hoc to paper Dinosaur viruses could infect scavenging ancestral mammals, reach germ cells, and become inherited.
    Purely speculative scenario described in 'The K-Pg Transmission Window'. No fossil or molecular evidence supports a specific dinosaur-to-mammal viral jump.
  • ad hoc to paper Both sexes of a nascent population must receive identical compatible genomic changes to found a new species.
    Required for the 'instantaneous speciation' model in 'EVEs as Speciation Catalysts'. The authors acknowledge the improbability but provide no evidence that it occurred.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Viral Hitchhikers and Macroevolution: A Novel Hypothesis on Explosive Speciation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/W7W4A6DD

@misc{pith2026250604511,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Viral Hitchhikers and Macroevolution: A Novel Hypothesis on Explosive Speciation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/W7W4A6DD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04511}
}
read the original abstract

Mobile genetic elements (e.g., endogenous viruses, LINEs, SINEs) can transfer between genomes, even between species, triggering dramatic genetic changes. Endogenous viral elements (EVEs) arise when infectious viruses integrate into the host germline. EVEs integrate at specific sites; their genes or regulatory regions can be exapted and could induce chromosomal rearrangement. We propose that EVEs participate in adaptive radiations and that their parent viruses, through interspecific transfer, could initiate new species formation. By synchronously affecting multiple individuals, viral outbreaks generate shared genomic changes that both facilitate reproductive isolation and provide the simultaneous modifications needed for groups to emerge as founders of new species. We suggest horizontal viral transfer during the K-Pg accelerated mammalian radiation linking viral epidemics to macroevolutionary diversification. This theoretical work proposes endogenous viruses as catalysts for explosive speciation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04511 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Proposed mechanisms of viral transfer and speciation. A. Post [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Endogenous viruses as drivers of speciation in post-K-Pg mammals. The hypothesis of viruses as speciation triggers in post-K-Pg mammals is illustrated, including the origin of genetic variation (dinosaurs), vectors (viruses), recipients (ancestral mammals), and modern mammalian orders located in the ancient Earth geography, where they are presumed to have arisen [51]. The processes required for speciation are listed… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and Katzourakis, A

    Aiewsakun, P. and Katzourakis, A. (2015) Endogenous viruses: Connecting recent and ancient viral evolution. Virology 479-480, 26-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2015.02.011

    work page doi:10.1016/j.virol.2015.02.011 2015

  2. [2]

    Santos, M.E. et al. (2014) The evolution of cichlid fish egg-spots is linked with a cis-regulatory change. Nat Commun. 5, 5149. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6149

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms6149 2014

  3. [3]

    Bourque, G. et al. (2018) Ten things you should know about transposable elements. Genome Biol. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-018-1577-z

    work page doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1577-z 2018

  4. [4]

    Widen, S.A. et al . (2023) Virus-like transposons cross the species barrier and drive the evolution of genetic incompatibilities. Science 380, 6652. DOI: 10.1126/science.ade0705

    work page doi:10.1126/science.ade0705 2023

  5. [5]

    Springer, M.S. et al. (2019) Evolutionary Models for the Diversification of Placental Mammals Across the KPg Boundary. Front Genet. 10, 1241. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01241

    work page arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    (2012) Viral evolution in deep time: lentiviruses and mammals

    Gifford, R.J. (2012) Viral evolution in deep time: lentiviruses and mammals . Trends Genet. 28(2), 89-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2011.11.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tig.2011.11.003 2012

  7. [7]

    and Gifford, R.J

    Katzourakis, A. and Gifford, R.J. (2010) Endogenous viral elements in animal genomes . PLoS Genet. 6(11), e1001191. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001191

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001191 2010

  8. [8]

    and Katzourakis, A

    Aswad, A. and Katzourakis, A. (2016) Paleovirology: The Study of Endogenous Viral Elements. In Virus Evolution: Current Research and Future Directions (Weaver, S.C.; Denison, M.; Roossinck, M. and Vignuzzi, M., eds.), pp: 273-292, Caister Academic Press, U.K

    work page 2016

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    and Gilbert, C

    Feschotte, C. and Gilbert, C. (2012) Endogenous viruses: insights into viral evolution and impact on host biology. Nat Rev Genet. 13(4), 283-96. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3199

    2012 doi

  2. [10]

    Lander, E.S. et al. (2001) International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860-921. DOI: 10.1038/35057062

    2001 doi

  3. [11]

    Zheng, J. et al . (2021) Molecular fossils illuminate the evolution of retroviruses following a macroevolutionary transition from land to water . PLoS Pathog. 17(7) , e1009730. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009730

    2021 doi

  4. [12]

    and Han, G.Z

    Wang, J. and Han, G.Z. (2023) Genome mining shows that retroviruses are pervasively invading vertebrate genomes. Nat Commun. 14(1), 4968. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-40732-w

    2023 doi

  5. [13]

    and Feschotte, C

    Frank, J.A. and Feschotte, C. (2017) Co-option of endogenous viral sequences for host cell function. Curr Opin Virol. 25, 81-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.coviro.2017.07.021

    2017 doi

  6. [14]

    Turelli, P. et al. (2014) Interplay of TRIM28 and DNA methylation in controlling human endogenous retroelements. Genome Res. 24(8), 1260-70. DOI: 10.1101/gr.172833.114

    2014 doi

  7. [15]

    Lynch, V.J. et al . (2015) Ancient transposable elements transformed the uterine regulatory landscape and transcriptome during the evolution of mammalian pregnancy. Cell Rep. 10(4) , 551-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.12.052

    2015 doi

  8. [16]

    and Rein, A

    Nair, S. and Rein, A. (2014) Antiretroviral restriction factors in mice. Virus Res. 193, 130-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2014.07.002

    2014 doi

  9. [17]

    Kazazian, H.H. Jr. (2004) Mobile elements: drivers of genome evolution. Science. 303, 1626-

    2004

  10. [18]

    Gifford, R.J. et al. (2018) Nomenclature for endogenous retrovirus (ERV) loci . Retrovirology 15(1), 59. DOI: 10.1186/s12977-018-0442-1

    2018 doi

  11. [19]

    Kawasaki, J. et al. (2021) 100-My history of bornavirus infections hidden in vertebrate genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 118(20), e2026235118. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2026235118

    2021 doi

  12. [20]

    (2015) Endogenous Retroviruses in the Genomics Era

    Johnson, W.E. (2015) Endogenous Retroviruses in the Genomics Era. Annu. Rev. Virol. 2, 135–

    2015

  13. [21]

    and Feschotte , C

    Zhuo, X. and Feschotte , C. (2015) Cross-Species Transmission and Differential Fate of an Endogenous Retrovirus in Three Mammal Lineages . PLoS Pathog. 11(11) , e1005279. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005279

    2015 doi

  14. [22]

    Wang, Y. et al. (2010) A novel active endogenous retrovirus family contributes to genome variability in rat inbred strains. Genome Res. 20(1), 19-27. DOI: 10.1101/gr.100073.109

    2010 doi

  15. [23]

    syncytins

    Lavialle, C. et al. (2013) Paleovirology of “syncytins”, retroviral env genes exapted for a role in placentation. Phil Trans R Soc B. 368, 20120507. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0507

    2013

  16. [24]

    van der Loo, W. et al. (2009) Sharing of endogenous lentiviral gene fragments among leporid lineages separated for more than 12 million years. J Virol. 83(5), 2386-8. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01116- 08

    2009 doi

  17. [25]

    Mata, H. et al. (2015) Identification and characterization of diverse groups of endogenous retroviruses in felids. Retrovirology 12, 26. DOI: 10.1186/s12977-015-0152-x

    2015 doi

  18. [26]

    Cornelis, G. et al. (2012) Ancestral capture of syncytin- Car1, a fusogenic endogenous retroviral envelope gene involved in placentation and conserved in Carnivora. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 109(7), E432-41. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1115346109

    2012 doi

  19. [27]

    Horie, M. et al. (2010) Endogenous non- retroviral RNA virus elements in mammalian genomes. Nature 463(7277), 84-7. DOI: 10.1038/nature08695

    2010 doi

  20. [28]

    and Tomonaga, K

    Horie, M. and Tomonaga, K. (2019) Paleovirology of bornaviruses: What can be learned from molecular fossils of bornaviruses. Virus Res 262, 2-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2018.04.006

    2019 doi

  21. [29]

    and Eldredge, N

    Gould, S.J. and Eldredge, N. (1977): Punctuated Equilibria: The Tempo and Mode of Evolution Reconsidered. Paleobiology, 3(2) 115-151

    1977

  22. [30]

    Margulis, L. ed. (1981) Symbiosis in cell evolution: life and it's environment W.H. Freeman publisher

    1981

  23. [31]

    Carlson, C.J. et al. (2022) Climate change increases cross -species viral transmission risk. Nature 607(7919), 555-562. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04788-w

    2022 doi

  24. [32]

    DOI: 10.1126/science.1089670

    doi

  25. [33]

    and Müller, M

    Martin, W. and Müller, M. (1998) The hydrogen hypothesis for the first eukaryote. Nature, 392(6671), 37-41. DOI:10.1038/32096

    1998 doi

  26. [34]

    et al (2016) Adaptation to Global Change: A Transposable Element -Epigenetics Perspective

    Rey, O. et al (2016) Adaptation to Global Change: A Transposable Element -Epigenetics Perspective. Trends in ecology & evolution. 31(7), 514–526. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.03.013

    2016 doi

  27. [35]

    Brait, N. et al. (2023) A tale of caution: How endogenous viral elements affect virus discovery in transcriptomic data. Virus Evol. 10(1), vead088. DOI: 10.1093/ve/vead088

    2023 doi

  28. [36]

    and Moreira, D

    López-García, P. and Moreira, D. (2020) The Syntrophy hypothesis for the origin of eukaryotes revisited. Nat Microbiol. 5(5), 655-667. DOI: 10.1038/s41564-020-0710-4

    2020 doi

  29. [37]

    Nishikimi, M. et al. (1994) Cloning and chromosomal mapping of the human nonfunctional gene for L-gulono-gamma-lactone oxidase, the enzyme for L -ascorbic acid biosynthesis missing in man. J Biol Chem. 269(18), 13685-8

    1994

  30. [38]

    King, M. ed. (1995) Species Evolution. The Role of Chromosome Change . Cambridge University Press

    1995

  31. [39]

    Cornelis, G. et al. (2017) An endogenous retroviral envelope syncytin and its cognate receptor identified in the viviparous placental Mabuya lizard. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 114(51) , E10991- E11000. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1714590114

    2017 doi

  32. [40]

    Wildschutte, J.H. et al. (2016) Discovery of unfixed endogenous retrovirus insertions in diverse human populations . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 113(16) , E2326-34. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1602336113

    2016 doi

  33. [41]

    Taylor, D.J. et al. (2010) Filoviruses are ancient and integrated into mammalian genomes . BMC Evol Biol. 10, 193. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-193

    2010 doi

  34. [42]

    Ritsch, M. et al. (2024) Endogenous viral elements: insights into data availability and accessibility. Virus Evol. 10(1), veae099. DOI: 10.1093/ve/veae099

    2024 doi

  35. [43]

    (2022) Comparative analysis reveals the long-term coevolutionary history of parvoviruses and vertebrates

    Campbell, M.A. (2022) Comparative analysis reveals the long-term coevolutionary history of parvoviruses and vertebrates. PLoS Biol 20(11), e3001867. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001867

    2022 doi

  36. [44]

    Fujino, K. et al. (2021) A Human Endogenous Bornavirus -Like Nucleoprotein Encodes a Mitochondrial Protein Associated with Cell Viability. J Virol. 95(14) , e0203020. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02030-20

    2021 doi

  37. [45]

    Dennis, T.P.W. et al. (2019) The evolution, distribution and diversity of endogenous circoviral elements in vertebrate genomes. Virus Res. 262, 15-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2018.03.014

    2019 doi

  38. [46]

    Pénzes, J.J. et al. (2019) An Ancient Lineage of Highly Divergent Parvoviruses Infects both Vertebrate and Invertebrate Hosts. Viruses 11(6), 525. DOI: 10.3390/v11060525

    2019 doi

  39. [47]

    and Feschotte, C

    Gilbert, C. and Feschotte, C. (2010) Genomic fossils calibrate the long- term evolution of hepadnaviruses. PLoS Biol. 8(9), e1000495. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000495

    2010 doi

  40. [48]

    Suh, A. et al. (2013) The genome of a Mesozoic paleovirus reveals the evolution of hepatitis B viruses. Nat Commun. 4, 1791. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2798

    2013 doi

  41. [49]

    and Katzourakis, A

    Aswad, A. and Katzourakis, A. (2014) The first endogenous herpesvirus, identified in the tarsier genome, and novel sequences from primate rhadinoviruses and lymphocryptoviruses . PLoS Genet. 10(6), e1004332. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004332

    2014 doi

  42. [50]

    and Katzourakis, A

    Nino Barreat, J.G. and Katzourakis, A. (2024) Deep mining reveals the diversity of endogenous viral elements in vertebrate genomes . Nat Microbiol. 9(11) , 3013-3024. DOI: 10.1038/s41564- 024-01825-4

    2024 doi

  43. [51]

    Springer, M.S. et al. (2011) The historical biogeography of Mammalia. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 366(1577), 2478-502. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0023

    2011

  44. [52]

    and Bork, P

    Letunic, I. and Bork, P. (2021) Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Research, 49(W1), W293 –W296. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab301

    2021 doi

  45. [59]

    DOI: 0.1146/annurev-virology-100114-054945

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.