Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 36 references

Cauchy Integral, Fractional Sobolev Spaces and Chord-Arc Curves

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Two natural definitions of fractional Sobolev spaces on a plane curve—the Douglas double-integral norm and the Littlewood–Paley harmonic-extension norm—coincide for every order $0\le s\le1$ on chord-arc curves whose Riemann map satisfies…

desk verdict The 0<s<1 machinery is new and mostly solid; the advertised s=1 endpoint in Theorem 5.4 is not established as stated. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04564 v2 pith:VBIVB6EA submitted 2025-06-05 math.CV math.CA

Huaying Wei , Michel Zinsmeister This is my paper
classification math.CVmath.CA MSC 42B2046E3531A0530H35
keywords CauchyintegralfractionalSobolevspaceschord-arccurvesDirichletinterpolationMuckenhouptA2weightsPlemelj-CalderónproblemBergman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks when two natural ways of measuring fractional smoothness on a plane curve agree. One way, the Douglas norm, integrates squared differences of a function over pairs of points on the curve; the other, the Littlewood–Paley norm, integrates squared gradients of its harmonic extensions weighted by distance to the curve. On the unit circle they coincide with the usual Fourier fractional Sobolev spaces, but on a general rectifiable curve they need not. The paper proves that for chord-arc curves whose Riemann map derivative satisfies the Muckenhoupt $A_2$ condition (averages of the derivative and of its reciprocal stay comparable), the two spaces coincide for every order $0\le s\le1$, with the identity as a bounded isomorphism; in particular this holds for Lipschitz curves. It also proves that the Cauchy singular integral operator is bounded on these spaces for chord-arc curves, solving the Plemelj–Calderón decomposition problem there.

What carries the argument

The proof is carried by the family of operators $V_s f(z)=\int_0^z (f\circ\varphi)'(u)\varphi'(u)^{1/2-s}\,du$ and the weighted Bergman spaces $A^2_{1-2s}$ on the unit disk. The identity $[A^2_1,A^2_{-1}]_s=A^2_{1-2s}$ from Bergman-space interpolation moves the equality from the endpoint orders $s=0,1$ to all $0<s<1$. The $A_2$ condition on $|\varphi'|$ enters through the conjugate operator $V_h^{-1}HV_h$ on the circle, where $h$ is the boundary homeomorphism induced by $\varphi$ and $H$ is the Hilbert transform: this operator is bounded on $L^2$ exactly when $|h'|=|\varphi'|\in A_2$, and that boundedness is the $s=0$ endpoint from which the interpolation scheme departs.

What would settle it

On a chord-arc curve with $|\varphi'|\notin A_2$, compute the ratio of the Douglas norm $\iint_{\Gamma\times\Gamma}|f(z)-f(\zeta)|^2/|z-\zeta|^{1+2s}\,d\sigma(z)d\sigma(\zeta)$ to the harmonic-extension norm $\iint_{\Omega_i\cup\Omega_e}|\nabla u|^2 d(z,\Gamma)^{1-2s}\,dxdy$ over a sequence of oscillating test functions: if the ratio is unbounded for some $s\in(0,1)$, the $A_2$ hypothesis is essential for equality at that order. Within the assumed class, a counterexample would be a single $|\varphi'|\in A_2$ chord-arc curve for which the two norms are inequivalent at some $s$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is Theorem 5.4: if $\Omega$ is a chord-arc domain with boundary $\Gamma$ and $\varphi$ is its Riemann map fixing $0$, and if $|\varphi'|$ belongs to the Muckenhoupt class $A_2$ on the unit circle, then $H^s(\Omega\to\Gamma)=H^s(\Gamma)$ for every $0\le s\le1$, and the identity is a bounded isomorphism. Here $H^s(\Gamma)$ is the Douglas space defined by the double integral with kernel $|z-\zeta|^{-1-2s}$ over $\Gamma\times\Gamma$, and $H^s(\Omega\to\Gamma)$ is the space of boundary traces of functions whose harmonic extension $u$ satisfies $\iint_{\Omega_i\cup\Omega_e}|\nabla u|^2 d(z,\Gamma)^{1-2s}\,dxdy<\infty$. The equality is proved by interpolation: at $s=0$ the identification with $L^2(\Gamma,d\sigma)$ is exactly the $A_2$ condition, at $s=1$ it follows from conjugation stability of $H^1(\Gamma)$ under the same hypothesis, and the Bergman-space interpolation identity $[A^2_1,A^2_{-1}]_s=A^2_{1-2s}$ carries the statement to interior orders. Because every Lipschitz curve satisfies the $A_2$ condition, the conclusion includes all Lipschitz domains. The paper's second main result is that the Cauchy singular integral operator is bounded on $H^s(\Gamma)$ for $0<s<1$ whenever $\Gamma$ is chord-arc, and on Lipschitz curves the norm satisfies the interpolation bound $C(1+M)^{\frac32|1-2s|}$.

Load-bearing premise

The equality proof depends on the derivative modulus of the Riemann map being a Muckenhoupt $A_2$ weight—roughly, averages of the derivative and of its reciprocal stay comparable—a condition strictly stronger than chord-arc regularity and one that some chord-arc curves are known to violate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If $\Gamma$ is Lipschitz, the Douglas and Littlewood–Paley fractional Sobolev norms are equivalent at every order $0\le s\le1$, so fractional regularity on such boundaries can be defined either by arc-length double integrals or by harmonic extension.
  • The Cauchy integral operator $T$ is bounded on $H^s(\Gamma)$ for chord-arc curves, so every $f\in H^s(\Gamma)$ admits a Plemelj–Calderón decomposition $f=F_i+F_e$ with holomorphic $F_i,F_e$ controlled in the same norm.
  • For Lipschitz curves with Lipschitz constant $M$, the operator norm satisfies $\|T\|_{H^s(\Gamma)\to H^s(\Gamma)}\le C(1+M)^{\frac32|1-2s|}$, interpolating between known $L^2$ and $H^1$ bounds.
  • For quasicircles of Minkowski dimension $h(\Gamma)$, the Calderón property for $H^s(\Gamma)$ holds exactly in the interval $\frac{h(\Gamma)-1}{2}<s<\frac{3-h(\Gamma)}{2}$.
  • Under the $A_2$ hypothesis, the equality $H^s(\Omega\to\Gamma)=H^s(\Gamma)$ upgrades the classical $s=1/2$ chord-arc theorem to the full scale of orders.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension the paper leaves implicit: if $|\varphi'|\notin A_2$, equality might still hold for a subinterval of $s$ whose extent is governed by how far the conformal derivative is from $A_2$, since the interpolation proof only forces the condition at the endpoints $s=0,1$.
  • The quasicircle interval theorem suggests a testable conjecture: for chord-arc curves, the orders $s$ at which the two norms coincide form an interval whose endpoints depend on the size of $\log|\varphi'|$ rather than on chord-arc geometry alone.
  • A computational check is feasible: on a discretised chord-arc fractal, compare the two norms on bandlimited functions across $s$; a sharp transition where they diverge would mark the true equality range and could be compared with the deviation of $\log|\varphi'|$ from $A_2$.
  • Because $H^s(\Omega\to\Gamma)$ is defined without arc length, the Calderón result in that norm suggests a way to define Cauchy integrals on non-rectifiable curves whenever the distance weight makes the norm finite.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies two families of fractional Sobolev spaces on a bounded Jordan curve Γ: the Littlewood-Paley space Hs(Γ), defined through harmonic extensions with the distance weight d(z,Γ)^{1-2s}, and the Douglas space Hs(Γ), defined through a double integral over Γ×Γ. On the unit circle both coincide with the Fourier-based fractional Sobolev space. The paper has two main goals: (1) determine when Hs(Γ)=Hs(Γ) for rectifiable curves, especially chord-arc curves, and (2) solve the Plemelj-Calderón problem for these spaces. The main results are Theorem 3.4, giving a sufficient range of s for the Plemelj-Calderón property on quasidisks using Astala's regularity theory; Theorems 4.3–4.6, proving boundedness of the Cauchy integral on the Douglas spaces Hs(Γ) for chord-arc and Lipschitz curves by interpolation between L2 and H1; and Theorem 5.4, which claims that under the Muckenhoupt condition |φ'|∈A2 on T the equality Hs(Ω→Γ)=Hs(Γ) holds for all 0≤s≤1. The proof of Theorem 5.4 uses interpolation of Bergman spaces and an operator Π between weighted Bergman spaces and boundary spaces.

Significance. If the equality theorem were valid, it would give a single scale of function spaces on chord-arc curves possessing both a double-integral (Douglas) and a harmonic-extension (Littlewood-Paley) description, and it would unify the Plemelj-Calderón results of Sections 3 and 4. The paper contains no fitted parameters: the A2 condition is a stated hypothesis, and the main sufficient condition is not an output of the argument. The interpolation proof of the boundedness of the Cauchy integral on Hs(Γ) for chord-arc curves is elegant and appears sound as far as it goes. However, the advertised equality theorem is not established in its stated form: the s=0 endpoint is false on the unit circle, the s=1 endpoint involves a norm not defined in the paper, and the interpolation step uses a family of operators rather than a single operator. These are load-bearing issues for the central claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [§5.2 (Theorem 5.2 and Corollary 5.3)] The proof of Theorem 5.2(1) uses the assertion 'E2(D)=A0(D)' to conclude that ∫∫_D |(T0f)'|^2(1-|z|)dxdy<∞ for f∈E2(Ω). This identity is false: E2(D) is the Hardy space H^2, while A0(D) is the analytic Dirichlet space consisting of f with ∫∫_D |f'|^2(1-|z|)dxdy<∞; for example, f(z)=∑_{n≥1} z^n/n^{3/4} belongs to E2(D) but not to A0(D). Consequently Corollary 5.3, which identifies L2(Γ,dσ) with H0(Ω→Γ), fails already for Ω=D, Γ=T, where H0(Ω→Γ) is the boundary space of the Dirichlet space rather than L2(T). Since the s=0 boundedness and surjectivity of Π in the proof of Theorem 5.4 rely on Corollary 5.3, Theorem 5.4 is false as stated at s=0.
  2. [§5.2 and §5.3 (Theorem 5.4, s=1 endpoint)] Theorem 5.4 states equality for 0≤s≤1, but Hs(Ω) is defined in §5.2 only for 0≤s<1 with weight d(z,Γ)^{1-2s}. At s=1 the weight becomes d(z,Γ)^{-1}; on the unit disk, for u(x,y)=x, the integral ∫∫_D |∇u|^2(1-|z|^2)^{-1}dxdy diverges while f(e^{iθ})=cosθ lies in H1(T). In the proof the space A1(Ω) is introduced by the condition V1(f)'∈A2_{-1}, which is a Hardy-space norm, not the limit of the Littlewood-Paley norm. Thus the claimed single-scale equality at s=1 is either false under the §5.2 definition or refers to a different norm that is never defined in the statement of Theorem 5.4. The endpoint s=1 must be corrected, or the theorem restricted to 0<s<1 with an explicit separate definition of H1.
  3. [§5.3 (interpolation step)] The proof of Theorem 5.4 invokes the functorial property of complex interpolation after establishing boundedness of Π at s=0 and s=1. However, Π is not a single operator: at s=0 it acts as Π0(g)=u with g=(f∘φ)'φ'^{1/2}, while at s=1 it acts as Π1(g)=u with g=(f∘φ)'φ'^{-1/2}. These are different maps between different interpolation couples, and the Bergman weight also changes with s. The functorial property quoted after Theorem 4.4 requires one linear operator L bounded from A0 to B0 and from A1 to B1. No analytic family connecting Π0 and Π1 is constructed; Remark 5.6 only sketches an alternative weighted-projection route and does not supply the missing interpolation argument. This gap affects the conclusion for every 0<s<1.
  4. [Abstract and §5] The abstract states that the chord-arc property is necessary and sufficient for equality at s=1/2 but 'this is no longer the case for general s∈(0,1)'. The manuscript proves only the sufficient direction under the stronger hypothesis |φ'|∈A2 (Theorem 5.4) and cites [20] for chord-arc curves with |φ'|∉A2. Failure of the sufficient condition does not imply failure of equality, and no counterexample is provided. This claim should either be proved, supplied with a specific reference where it is proved, or removed from the abstract.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Theorem 5.4] The word 'isomrophism' should be 'isomorphism'.
  2. [§5.2] The notation Hs(Γ) and Hs(Γ) is easy to confuse; the paper would benefit from a table of notations or consistently distinct fonts throughout.
  3. [§4] Theorem 4.1 is stated and then immediately said not to be used in the proof; it may be moved to the introduction or omitted to improve focus.
  4. [§5.1] The claim that a curve which is a Lipschitz graph in polar coordinates satisfies |φ'|∈A2 via the Helson-Szegő condition is stated without proof or reference; please add a citation or a short proof.
  5. [§5.3] The sentence 'A2_{-1} is the classical Hardy space E2(D), i.e. ... ∫_D |g'(z)|^2(1-|z|^2)dxdy<∞' is imprecise: A2_{-1} is defined by ∫|g|^2(1-|z|^2)^{-1}dxdy, and the derivative condition is an equivalent norm, not the definition.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Equality for 0<s<1 is obtained by interpolation with independent endpoint content; only the s=1 endpoint is an identity by construction.

  1. self definitional [Section 5.3 (Interpolation), proof of Theorem 5.4, definition of A^1(Omega) and H^1(Omega->Gamma)]
    "By this definition, the space of the boundary trace of H^1(Omega), the harmonic counterpart of A^1(Omega), is just H^1(Gamma), i.e., H^1(Omega->Gamma)=H^1(Gamma)."

    Theorem 5.4 states the equality H^s(Omega->Gamma)=H^s(Gamma) for 0<=s<=1, but H^s(Omega->Gamma) was defined in Section 5.2 only for 0<=s<1 via the Littlewood-Paley integral with weight d(z,Gamma)^{1-2s}. In the proof, the s=1 space is introduced by defining A^1(Omega) through V_1(f)' in A^2_{-1}, i.e., f' in E^2(Omega), which is chosen so that the boundary trace equals the already defined H^1(Gamma) (anti-derivatives of L^2 functions). Thus the endpoint s=1 of the theorem is an identity by construction rather than a derived equality; the integral definition used for s<1 would diverge at s=1. The interpolation for 0<s<1 uses this defined endpoint as its s=1 anchor, so the s=1 claim is not independent evidence, although the interior equality is not reduced to the conclusion.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, the equality H^s(Omega->Gamma)=H^s(Gamma) for 0<s<1 under |phi'| in A2, is not circular: the proof establishes the s=0 endpoint non-trivially via Corollary 5.3 and the s=1 endpoint by an explicit extension of the definition of H^1(Omega->Gamma), and the interior values then follow by Bergman-space and Calderon interpolation. No parameter is fitted, and the Muckenhoupt condition |phi'| in A2 is a stated sufficient hypothesis from weighted norm theory (Helson-Szego), not an output of the argument. The only definitional reduction is the s=1 endpoint, where the theorem restates the chosen definition. The abstract's assertion that equality is 'no longer the case for general s' relies on Jones-Zinsmeister [20] rather than on a counterexample constructed here, and the interpolation step would need a single analytic family of operators to be fully rigorous; these are support gaps or correctness risks, not circular deductions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted: h(Γ) is a geometric quantity, the A2 condition is a stated hypothesis, and all constants are universal. The axioms are standard results from quasiconformal theory, weight theory, interpolation theory, and geometric function theory, plus the geometric hypotheses of the theorems.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Chord-arc inequality: the shorter arc between two points on Γ has length at most K times the chord distance.
    Used throughout Section 4 to obtain the bi-Lipschitz parametrization λ and to transfer spaces to T; stated in the geometric description of chord-arc curves in Section 4.
  • domain assumption Muckenhoupt condition |φ'|∈A2 on T.
    Postulated in Theorems 5.1, 5.4 and Corollary 5.3 to make the conjugation operator bounded and the endpoint identifications hold. It is not implied by chord-arc regularity, as noted with reference [20].
  • domain assumption Every quasicircle is porous and has a δ-regularity exponent h(Γ)<2.
    Invoked in Section 3 to apply Astala's Theorem 3.3, which requires porous Jordan curves; used to define the shadow region in Theorem 3.4.
  • standard math Astala's criterion: d(z,Γ)^{α-1}∈A2 if and only if α>h(Γ)-1 for porous Jordan curves.
    Taken from [3] and used as the engine for Theorem 3.4; accepted as an external theorem.
  • standard math Complex interpolation theorems for Sobolev, Hardy, and weighted Bergman spaces, including exactness and the formula [A^2_1,A^2_{-1}]_s=A^2_{1-2s}.
    Used in Theorems 4.4, 4.5, and 5.4; referenced to [29], [5], and [33].
  • standard math David's theorem: the Cauchy singular integral is bounded on L2(Γ,dσ) if and only if Γ is Ahlfors-regular.
    Input for Theorem 4.5 and for the decomposition f'=φ_i+φ_e in Theorem 4.3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cauchy Integral, Fractional Sobolev Spaces and Chord-Arc Curves." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VBIVB6EA

@misc{pith2026250604564,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cauchy Integral, Fractional Sobolev Spaces and Chord-Arc Curves},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VBIVB6EA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04564}
}
abstract

Let $\Gamma$ be a bounded Jordan curve and $\Omega_i,\Omega_e$ its two complementary components. For $s\in(0,1)$ we define $\mathcal{H}^s(\Gamma)$ as the set of functions $f:\Gamma\to \mathbb C$ having harmonic extension $u$ in $\Omega_i\cup \Omega_e$ such that $$ \iint_{\Omega_i\cup \Omega_e} |\nabla u(z)|^2 d(z,\Gamma)^{1-2s} dxdy<+\infty.$$ If $\Gamma$ is further assumed to be rectifiable we define $H^s(\Gamma)$ as the space of measurable functions $f:\Gamma\to \mathbb C$ such that $$\iint_{\Gamma\times \Gamma}\frac{|f(z)-f(\zeta)|^2}{|z-\zeta|^{1+2s}} d\sigma(z)d\sigma(\zeta)<+\infty.$$ When $\Gamma$ is the unit circle these two spaces coincide with the homogeneous fractional Sobolev space defined via Fourier series. For a general rectifiable curve these two spaces need not coincide and our first goal is to investigate the cases of equality: while the chord-arc property is the necessary and sufficient condition for equality in the classical case of $s=1/2$, this is no longer the case for general $s\in (0,1)$. We show however that equality holds for Lipschitz curves. The second goal involves the Plemelj-Calder\'on problem. ......

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04564 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Domain formed by points (h(Γ), s) (1) any f ∈ Hs (Γ) can be written as f = Fi |Γ − Fe|Γ with Fi and Fe being analytic in Ωi and Ωe, respectively; (2) Moreover, Fi,e ∈ Hs (Ωi,e) and exists C > 0 such that ∥Fi,e∥Hs(Ωi,e) ≤ C∥f∥Hs(Γ). Proof. Following the discussion above, it is clear that statement (2) holds if the weight d(z, Γ)1−2s ∈ A2. Assume first that s ∈ (0, 1/2): then, by the definition of A2, d(z, Γ)1−2s ∈ A2… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [32]

    Wei, H., Zinsmeister, M.: Dirichlet spaces over chord-arc domains.Math. Ann. 391(1), 1045–1064 (2025) 23

    work page 2025

  2. [20]

    Jonsson, A., Wallin, H.:Function Spaces on Subsets ofRn. Math. Rep.2(1) (1984)

    work page 1984

  3. [1]

    Mathematical Studies, vol

    Ahlfors, L.V.:Lectures on Quasiconformal Mappings. Mathematical Studies, vol

    work page

  4. [2]

    Part I.Ann

    Aronszajn, N., Smith, K.T.: Theory of Bessel potentials. Part I.Ann. Inst. Fourier, Grenoble11, 385-475 (1961)

    work page 1961

  5. [3]

    Revista Mat

    Astala, K.: Calderón’s problem forLipschitzclasses andthe dimension ofquasicircles. Revista Mat. Iberoamericana4, 469-486 (1988)

    work page 1988

  6. [4]

    Békollé, D., Bonami, A.: Inégalités à poids pour le noyau de Bergman.C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sér. A286, 775-778 (1978)

    work page 1978

  7. [5]

    An Introduction

    Bergh, J., Löfström, J.:Interpolation Spaces. An Introduction. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, No. 223. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York (1976)

    work page 1976

  8. [6]

    Brewster, K., Mitrea, D., Mitrea, I., Mitrea, M.: Extending Sobolev functions with partially vanishing traces from locally(ϵ,δ )-domains and applications to mixed boundary problems.J. Funct. Anal.266(7), (2014)

    work page 2014

Show all 36 references
  1. [7]

    Calderón, A.P.: Cauchy integrals on Lipschitz curves and related operators.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.74, 1324-1327 (1977)

    1977

  2. [8]

    Calderón, A.P.: Intermediate spaces and interpolation.Studia Math., Special Series 1, 31-34 (1963)

    1963

  3. [9]

    Coifman, R., Fefferman, C.: Weighted norm inequalities for maximal functions and singular integrals.Studia Math.51, 241-250 (1974) 22

    1974

  4. [10]

    Van Nostrand, Princeton (1966)

    1966

  5. [11]

    of Math.116(2), 361-387 (1982)

    Coifman, R., McIntosh, A., Meyer, Y.: L’intégrale de Cauchy définit un opérateur borné surL2 pour les courbes lipschitziennes.Ann. of Math.116(2), 361-387 (1982)

    1982

  6. [12]

    David, G.: Opérateurs intégraux singuliers sur certaines courbes du plan complexe. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup.17, 157-189 (1984)

    1984

  7. [13]

    David, G.: A lower bound for the norm of the Cauchy operator on Lipschitz graphs. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.302(2), 741–750 (1987)

    1987

  8. [14]

    Ding, Z.: A proof of the trace theorem of Sobolev spaces on Lipschitz domains. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.124(2), 591-600 (1996)

    1996

  9. [15]

    Academic Press, New York (1980)

    Garnett, J.:Bounded Analytic Functions. Academic Press, New York (1980)

    1980

  10. [16]

    Gehring, F.W., Martio, O.: QuasidisksandtheHardy-Littlewoodproperty.Complex Variables Theory Appl.2, 67-78 (1983)

    1983

  11. [17]

    Gundy, R.F., Wheeden, R.L.: Weighted integral inequalities for the nontangential maximal function, Lusin area integral, and Walsh-Paley series.Studia Math.49, 107–124 (1973/74)

    1973

  12. [18]

    Scand.50, 221-247 (1982)

    Jerison, D.S., Kenig, C.E.: Hardy spaces,A∞, and singular integrals on chord-arc domains.Math. Scand.50, 221-247 (1982)

    1982

  13. [19]

    Math.147, 71-88 (1981)

    Jones, P.W.: Quasiconformal mappings and extendability of functions in Sobolev spaces.Acta. Math.147, 71-88 (1981)

    1981

  14. [21]

    Jones, P., Zinsmeister, M.: Sur la transformation conforme des domaines de Lavrentiev.C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math.295(10), 563-566 (1982)

    1982

  15. [22]

    Z.306(4), 59 (2024)

    Liu, T., Shen, Y.: The jump problem for the critical Besov space.Math. Z.306(4), 59 (2024)

    2024

  16. [23]

    VI,Nagoya Math

    Murai, T.: Boundedness of singular integral operators of Calderón type. VI,Nagoya Math. J.102, 127-133 (1986)

    1986

  17. [24]

    Math.32(1), 1-34 (1995)

    Nag, S., Sullivan, D.: Teichmüller theory and the universal period mapping via quantum calculus and theH1/2 space on the circle.Osaka J. Math.32(1), 1-34 (1995)

    1995

  18. [25]

    Plemelj, J.: Riemannsche Funktionenscharen mit gegebener Monodromiegruppe. Monatsh. Math. Phys.19(1), 211-245 (1908)

    1908

  19. [26]

    Schippers, E., Staubach, W.: Harmonic reflection in quasicircles and well-posedness of a Riemann problem on quasidisks.J. Math. Anal. Appl.448(2), 864–884 (2017)

    2017

  20. [27]

    Math.24(1), 113-139 (1980)

    Stegenga, D.A.: Multipliers of the Dirichlet space.Illinois J. Math.24(1), 113-139 (1980)

    1980

  21. [28]

    Taylor, G.D.: Multiplies onDα.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.123, 229–240 (1966)

    1966

  22. [29]

    Basic theory

    Taylor, M.E.:Partial Differential Equations I. Basic theory. Appl. Math. Sci.,

  23. [30]

    Väisälä, J.: Porous sets and quasisymmetric maps.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 299(2), 525-533 (1987)

    1987

  24. [31]

    II.Monogr

    Triebel, H.:Theory of Function Spaces. II.Monogr. Math., 84, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel (1992)

    1992

  25. [33]

    Viklund, F., Wang, Y.: Interplay between Loewner and Dirichlet energies via conformal welding and flow-lines.Geom. Funct. Anal.30, 289-321 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Zinsmeister, M.: Problèmes de Dirichlet, Neumann, Calderón dans les quasidis- ques pour les classes höldériennes (Dirichlet, Neumann and Calderón problems in quasidisks for Hölder classes).Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana2(3), 319–332 (1986) 24

    1986

  27. [35]

    Zhao, R., Zhu, K.: Theory of Bergman Spaces in the Unit Ball ofCn.Mémoires SMF, 2006

    2006

  28. [115]

    Springer, Cham (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.