The asymptotics of the $\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{C})$-Hitchin metric on the singular locus: subintegrable systems

Johannes Horn; Nianzi Li; Siqi He

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 35 references

The asymptotics of the $\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{C})$-Hitchin metric on the singular locus: subintegrable systems

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read On singular Hitchin fibers, the restricted hyperkähler metric converges exponentially to the semi-flat metric.

desk verdict A credible extension of exponential convergence to locally fiducial Higgs bundles and a metric comparison that answers Hitchin's question, but one load-bearing identification of the semi-flat model is only sketched. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04957 v1 pith:7DVOIGBK submitted 2025-06-05 math.DG

Siqi He , Johannes Horn , Nianzi Li This is my paper

classification math.DG MSC 53C2653C0714H60

keywords Hitchinmodulispacehyperkählermetricsemi-flatsingularfiberssubintegrablesystemsexponentialconvergencelimitingconfigurationsHiggsbundles

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that, along the rescaling rays in certain degenerate Hitchin fibers, the hyperkähler metric coming from the Hitchin equations is exponentially close to the semi-flat metric built from the abelian fibration, answering a question Hitchin posed for his subintegrable systems. The precise statement (Theorem 1.4) is that for rays in $\mathbb{M}_d$ with $d<2g-2$ the difference of the two metrics is $O(e^{-\varepsilon t})$ as $t\to\infty$, and a generalization (Theorem 1.5) covers closed strata of singular fibers. The key is to extend exponential convergence of solutions to the Hitchin equations to 'locally fiducial' Higgs bundles—those where all Hecke parameters vanish—under the condition that the quadratic differential has at least one zero of odd order. If correct, this gives the first quantitative asymptotic description of the $L^2$ metric on the singular locus of the $\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{C})$-Hitchin moduli space.

What carries the argument

The central object is the class of locally fiducial Higgs bundles: Higgs bundles in a singular Hitchin fiber whose Hecke parameters all vanish, equivalently those whose limiting configuration metric has $g_1=1$ in canonical coordinates, so that the model fiducial solutions near each zero of $q$ solve the Hitchin equation exactly up to exponentially small error. Those model solutions are governed by a Painlevé-type III ODE whose solutions $\psi(\rho)$ decay like $\rho^{-1/2}e^{-\rho}$; gluing them with cutoff functions produces approximate solutions, and a spectral bound (Proposition 4.5) for the linearized operator $L_t$, using an odd-order zero to rule out kernel sections, yields the exponential convergence. For the metric comparison, the paper uses the Gauss-Manin connection on the Prym variety to split tangent vectors into horizontal and vertical parts and shows each part's harmonic representative satisfies the needed decay estimates.

What would settle it

Find a locally fiducial Higgs bundle whose quadratic differential has only even-order zeros (for instance a single zero of order $4g-4$) and compute the lowest eigenvalue of the operator $L_t^0$ in Proposition 4.5; if that eigenvalue decays to zero as $t\to\infty$, the contradiction argument fails and the exponential $O(e^{-\varepsilon t})$ metric comparison would not follow, and a direct computation showing only polynomial decay of the metric difference would refute the claim for that case.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the $L^2$ hyperkähler metric restricted to Hitchin's subintegrable systems $\mathbb{M}_d$, and more generally to the closed strata $\mathbb{M}_{p,V_{\max}}$, is approximated by the (generalized) semi-flat metric up to errors that decay exponentially fast along any ray $(E,t\varphi)$ with $t\to\infty$. The proof establishes exponential convergence of the solutions $(A_t,\phi_t)$ of the Hitchin equations to the limiting configuration $(A_\infty,\phi_\infty)$ on compact sets away from the zeros of $q$, for every locally fiducial Higgs bundle whose quadratic differential has at least one odd-order zero (Theorem 1.2). This analytic convergence is then converted, by a deformation argument for Gauss-Manin families, into the metric comparison: horizontal and vertical tangent vectors of $\mathbb{M}_d$ each contribute metrics that differ from their semi-flat counterparts by $O(e^{-\varepsilon t})$, and the cross terms vanish even faster.

Load-bearing premise

The proof relies on the Higgs bundle being locally fiducial—all Hecke parameters vanish in the canonical local form—and on the quadratic differential having at least one zero of odd order; if either fails, the exponential convergence of the Hitchin solutions, and with it the metric comparison, is no longer obtained by the paper's argument.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Hitchin's Question 1.3 has an affirmative answer: on each subintegrable system $\mathbb{M}_d$ with $d<2g-2$, the restricted $L^2$ metric is exponentially close to the semi-flat metric along rays.
The previously known exponential convergence is extended from pushforwards of line bundles on the normalization to the larger class of locally fiducial Higgs bundles, which includes the Hitchin section at singular fibers.
For every stratum $\mathbb{B}_p$ containing at least one odd number and with $|p|>2g-2$, and generically beyond, the restricted $L^2$ metric on the closed stratum $\mathbb{M}_{p,V_{\max}}$ converges to a generalized semi-flat metric with exponential rate.
The case $d=2g-2$ is already exact, so the new result covers the complementary range where the restricted Hitchin metric and the flat hyperkähler metric differ by a nontrivial exponential correction.
The exponential scale of the error means the semi-flat approximation holds not just to leading order but with a definite rate, which is the kind of control needed for wall-crossing-type asymptotic expansions of the hyperkähler metric.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper: the exponential rate $\varepsilon$ is not computed; a natural extension is to identify it as the smallest gap in the spectrum of the model operator, likely related to the lowest-order zero of $q$ and the Painlevé-III spectral gap.
Beyond the paper: for non-fiducial bundles the Hecke parameters make the Higgs field degenerate at nodes, so one might test numerically whether the metric difference decays only polynomially, say $O(t^{-\alpha})$, rather than exponentially.
Beyond the paper: the same strategy may generalize to higher-rank Hitchin systems or symplectic and orthogonal groups, where the analogues of subintegrable systems and fiducial solutions are less developed; the canonical local forms would be the first ingredient to transfer.
Beyond the paper: because the limiting configuration is insensitive to Hecke modifications when the abelian part is fixed, the leading asymptotics should depend only on the Prym data; this is a concrete prediction one could check by direct computation in a rank-one toy model.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper does what it says: it extends exponential convergence of Hitchin-equation solutions to locally fiducial Higgs bundles on singular spectral curves, and uses that to prove exponential convergence of the restricted L2 metric to a semi-flat (or generalized semi-flat) metric on subintegrable systems, answering a question Hitchin posed. I think the central argument is right, but there is one genuine soft spot you should know about before leaning on it.

What is new: the locally fiducial class is a real addition. It covers the Hitchin section at singular fibers, which the earlier pushforward results of Mochizuki–Szabo do not. The generalized semi-flat metric for arbitrary strata is also new. The analytic machinery is carefully adapted from MSWW and Mochizuki, and the main estimates—approximate solutions, invertibility of the linearized operator, a priori bounds—are written out in enough detail to be plausible. The authors earn credit for treating the singular spectral curve case directly, not by a formal limiting argument.

The soft spots, in order of importance. First, Theorem 5.14, which characterizes Gauss–Manin horizontal tangent vectors, is proved only by saying it is 'similar to [26, Theorem 3.28]', and Lemma 5.16 (Lagrangian property) is asserted without proof. This matters because Section 7.1 defines the comparison metric through the induced splitting and then states that this definition coincides with Freed's semi-flat metric. If that identification were off, Theorem 1.4 would compare against the wrong model. I see no sign that it is off—the construction follows Mochizuki's framework—but this is exactly the kind of structural step that should be fully written out before publication. Second, the 'generic rays' hypothesis in Theorem 1.5 is vague; the paper never says what generic means for |p| ≤ 2g−2. That needs a precise statement or a footnote explaining the exceptional set. Third, the reliance on unpublished preprints (Mochizuki's [26], and [15] by He–Mazzeo–Na–Wentworth) is heavy, but the specific results cited are used precisely, so this is a dependency issue, not a gap.

One thing the reader's report emphasized is that the locally fiducial and odd-zero hypotheses are assumptions of the main theorems. That is true, but they hold automatically for the subintegrable systems M_d with d < 2g−2, which is the setting of Theorem 1.4. So they do not limit the headline result.

Who this is for: anyone working on asymptotic geometry of Higgs moduli spaces, especially the singular fibers and the Hitchin metric. It is a solid, significant paper that deserves a serious referee. My recommendation: send it for peer review, but ask the authors to expand Section 5.4 and sharpen the generic-rays statement. If those are fixed, I would be happy to cite it.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the asymptotics of the L^2 hyperkähler metric on the SL(2,C)-Hitchin moduli space restricted to singular fibers of the Hitchin fibration. It introduces the class of locally fiducial Higgs bundles (Definition 3.10), for which the model fiducial solutions solve the Hitchin equations up to exponentially small error near the zeros of the quadratic differential. The main analytic result (Theorem 1.2 / Theorem 4.1) establishes exponential convergence of the solutions to the limiting configuration on compact sets away from the zeros. This is then used to prove Theorem 1.4: along rays in the subintegrable system M_d with d < 2g−2, the restriction of the Hitchin metric converges exponentially to the semi-flat metric g_sf,d, answering a question of Hitchin. Theorem 1.5 extends the comparison to a generalized semi-flat metric on closed strata of arbitrary partitions.

Significance. If the results hold, they give a significant advance: they extend exponential convergence theory from regular fibers and from the Mochizuki–Szabó pushforward case to a broader class of singular fibers, and they provide the first affirmative answer to Hitchin's Question 1.3 for subintegrable systems of dimension below 2g−2. The paper is carefully structured, with detailed analytic estimates in Section 4 (approximate solutions, invertibility of the linearized operator, a priori bounds) and clear references to prior work. The locally fiducial condition is natural, and the paper correctly observes that it is automatic on the closed strata used in the subintegrable systems. The central derivation is an independent argument rather than a fit to existing results.

major comments (2)

[§5.4 (Theorem 5.14 and Lemma 5.16); §7.1] The identification of the Gauss–Manin horizontal subspace with Im(Υ_0) is only sketched as 'Similar to [26, Theorem 3.28]', and Lemma 5.16 is stated without proof. This step is load-bearing: in §7.1 the semi-flat metric on M_d is defined via the splitting ι_h, and the assertion that this definition coincides with Freed's classical construction is what allows Theorem 1.4 to answer Hitchin's Question 1.3. A failure of this identification would mean that the exponential estimates in Propositions 7.7 and 7.15 compare the Hitchin metric to a different model metric. I request a complete proof, or at least a detailed transfer argument that explicitly handles the singular spectral curves and the Hecke-modified pushforward, together with a proof of the Lagrangian property in Lemma 5.16.
[Theorem 1.5; §7.3] The hypothesis 'generic rays' is not defined. Theorem 1.5 states that for |p| ≤ 2g−2 the result holds for generic rays, and §7.3 repeats 'assumed to be generic when r_even + r_odd ≤ 2g−2', but neither the theorem nor the proof specifies what genericity means (generic in the base B_p? generic in the Prym torsor? a condition on the spectral curve or on the line bundle?). Because this qualification limits the scope of the theorem, it must be stated precisely and the genericity must be verified in the proof.

minor comments (6)

[§6.1, proof of Lemma 6.1] The Kähler potential is printed as K = ∫_Σ |qq| dA; this is presumably a typo for |q| (or the appropriate power of |q|) and should be corrected.
[§4.3] The word 'eigenfunciton' should be 'eigenfunction'.
[§4] The notation for the convergence constants alternates between C_{l,K}, C'_{l,K} and C_{K,l}; please unify the notation.
[§1, Acknowledgements] The name 'Ricahrd Wentworth' should be 'Richard Wentworth'.
[§2.4] The word 'Prodd' appears to be a typo for 'Prod' in the description of the partition.
[Theorem 1.5] The notation |p| for the length of the partition p is used without an explicit definition; please define it when the partition is introduced in §2.4.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main theorems are independent analytic estimates, with only minor reliance on the authors' published prior stratification results.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is not circular. Theorem 1.2 proves exponential convergence for locally fiducial Higgs bundles by constructing approximate solutions (Section 4.2), estimating the error term in Proposition 4.4, and proving a uniform lower bound for the linearized operator in Proposition 4.5. The 'locally fiducial' condition (Definition 3.10) is a structural hypothesis stated in terms of the limiting configuration metric and vanishing Hecke parameters; it is not a parameter fitted to the exponential decay being proved, so the conclusion is not built into the definition. Theorem 1.4 compares the Hitchin metric g_L2 with the semi-flat metric g_sf,d defined through the classical Gauss-Manin splitting and Freed's construction (Section 6, Proposition 6.2), not with a metric invented as the limit of g_L2. The comparison estimates in Propositions 7.7 and 7.15 are genuine inequalities between two independently defined metrics. The paper does rely on prior work, including the second author's published stratification results [20, 21] and Mochizuki's convergence and Gauss-Manin results [25, 26, 29], but these citations are external or published with stated assumptions that do not include the target exponential-convergence or metric-asymptotics statements. The proof of Theorem 5.14 is sketched as 'Similar to [26, Theorem 3.28]' and Lemma 5.16 is cited from [26, Corollary 3.33]; this is a rigor or completeness concern about the identification of the Gauss-Manin splitting, not a circular reduction, and [26] is not authored by the present authors. Self-citations such as [15, 20, 21] provide published foundations for the stratification and local normal forms, but the central claims of this paper do not reduce by equations to those inputs. Therefore the appropriate finding is no significant circularity, with a low score reflecting minor self-reliance and a few sketched citations rather than any definitional or fitted-input circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data. The paper introduces the class of locally fiducial Higgs bundles and a generalized semi-flat metric, but these are mathematical definitions rather than new physical entities; no new particles, forces, or dimensions are postulated.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption q = det(φ) has at least one zero of odd order.
Assumed in Theorems 1.2 and 1.5; the contradiction in the proof of Proposition 4.5 requires an odd-order zero to conclude ψ∞ = 0.
ad hoc to paper Locally fiducial: in canonical limiting coordinates, g1 = 1 (equivalently all Hecke parameters vanish).
Definition 3.10. This class is exactly where the approximate solutions of Section 4.2 can be built with exponential error; for bundles outside this class the Higgs field degenerates at nodes and the decoupling fails.
domain assumption The stratification of singular Hitchin fibers by Hecke parameters and u-coordinates from [20].
Used throughout Section 2 to parametrize strata and define the canonical local form (Theorem 3.9).
domain assumption Mochizuki's convergence theorem and the Mochizuki map for pushforward bundles [25, 29].
Baseline convergence and the definition of the limiting configuration in Theorem 3.4 are imported from these works.
domain assumption Freed's construction of semi-flat hyperkähler metrics on algebraically completely integrable systems [12].
Defines the metric g_{sf,d} on M_d and the generalized semi-flat metric in Section 6.
ad hoc to paper Generic rays in Theorem 1.5 when |p| ≤ 2g-2.
The condition is stated but not made precise; no measure or explicit characterization of genericity is given.

invented entities (1)

Locally fiducial Higgs bundle
purpose: Defines the subclass of Higgs bundles for which exponential convergence and the metric comparison are proven.
It is a mathematical definition tailored to make the decoupling construction work, not a falsifiable physical entity with independent evidence.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The asymptotics of the $\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{C})$-Hitchin metric on the singular locus: subintegrable systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7DVOIGBK

@misc{pith2026250604957,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The asymptotics of the $\mathrmSL_2(\mathbbC)$-Hitchin metric on the singular locus: subintegrable systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7DVOIGBK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04957}
}

abstract

We study the asymptotic hyperk\"ahler geometry of the $\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{C})$-Hitchin moduli space over the singular fibers of the Hitchin fibration. We extend the previously known exponential convergence results for solutions to the Hitchin equation to the class of locally fiducial Higgs bundles defined by a special local description at the singularities of the spectral curve. This condition is satisfied by the Higgs bundles contained in certain subintegrable systems introduced by Hitchin. We prove that the restriction of the hyperk\"ahler metric to the subintegrable system converges exponentially fast to the corresponding semi-flat metric along a ray $(\mathcal{E},t\varphi)$. This answers a question posed by Hitchin in \cite{Hitchin2021subintegrable_special_Kaehler}. More generally, we prove that for each stratum of quadratic differentials there is a closed subset of the corresponding Hitchin fibers, such that the restricted hyperk\"ahler metric converges to a generalized semi-flat metric.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

[26]

Asymptotic behaviour of the Hitchin metric on the moduli space of Higgs bundles

Takuro Mochizuki. Asymptotic behaviour of the Hitchin metric on the moduli space of Higgs bundles. Preprint arXiv:2305.17638, 2023

arXiv 2023
[15]

The algebraic and analytic compactifications of the Hitchin moduli space.Moduli, 1:Paper No

Siqi He, Rafe Mazzeo, Xuesen Na, and Richard Wentworth. The algebraic and analytic compactifications of the Hitchin moduli space.Moduli, 1:Paper No. e2, 45, 2024

work page 2024
[1]

Arnaud Beauville, M. S. Narasimhan, and S. Ramanan. Spectral curves and the generalised theta divisor.J. Reine Angew. Math., 398:169–179, 1989

1989
[2]

The image inM g of strata of meromorphic and quadratic differentials.Math

Andrei Bud. The image inM g of strata of meromorphic and quadratic differentials.Math. Z., 298(3- 4):975–988, 2021

work page 2021
[3]

Asymptotic geometry of the moduli space of rank two irregular Higgs bundles over the projective line.Preprint arXiv:2206.11883, 2022

Gao Chen and Nianzi Li. Asymptotic geometry of the moduli space of rank two irregular Higgs bundles over the projective line.Preprint arXiv:2206.11883, 2022

arXiv 2022
[4]

Asymptotics of Higgs bundles in the Hitchin component.Adv

Brian Collier and Qiongling Li. Asymptotics of Higgs bundles in the Hitchin component.Adv. Math., 307:488–558, 2017. 40

work page 2017
[5]

P. R. Cook. Compactified Jacobians and curves with simple singularities. InAlgebraic geometry. Pre- sented at EUROPROJ conferences at Catania 1993/Barcelona 1994, pages 37–47. 1998

work page 1993
[6]

Compactification of generalised Jacobians.Proc

Cyril D’Souza. Compactification of generalised Jacobians.Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Sect. A Math. Sci., 88(5):419–457, 1979

work page 1979

Show all 35 references

[7]

Asymptotics of Hitchin’s metric on the Hitchin section.Comm

David Dumas and Andrew Neitzke. Asymptotics of Hitchin’s metric on the Hitchin section.Comm. Math. Phys., 367(1):127–150, 2019

2019
[8]

Gothen, Andr´ e Oliveira, and Ana Pe´ on-Nieto

Emilio Franco, Peter B. Gothen, Andr´ e Oliveira, and Ana Pe´ on-Nieto. Unramified covers and branes on the Hitchin system.Adv. Math., 377:62, 2021

2021
[9]

Generic ends of the moduli space of SL(n,C)-Higgs bundles.Arxiv preprint arXiv:1810.01556, 2018

Laura Fredrickson. Generic ends of the moduli space of SL(n,C)-Higgs bundles.Arxiv preprint arXiv:1810.01556, 2018

2018 arXiv
[10]

Exponential decay for the asymptotic geometry of the Hitchin metric.Comm

Laura Fredrickson. Exponential decay for the asymptotic geometry of the Hitchin metric.Comm. Math. Phys., 375(2):1393–1426, 2020

2020
[11]

Asymptotic geometry of the moduli space of parabolic SL(2,C)-Higgs bundles.J

Laura Fredrickson, Rafe Mazzeo, Jan Swoboda, and Hartmut Weiss. Asymptotic geometry of the moduli space of parabolic SL(2,C)-Higgs bundles.J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2), 106(2):590–661, 2022

2022
[12]

Daniel S. Freed. Special K¨ ahler manifolds.Comm. Math. Phys., 203(1):31–52, 1999

1999
[13]

Moore, and Andrew Neitzke

Davide Gaiotto, Gregory W. Moore, and Andrew Neitzke. Wall-crossing, Hitchin systems, and the WKB approximation.Adv. Math., 234:239–403, 2013

2013
[14]

Prym varieties of spectral covers.Geom

Tam´ as Hausel and Christian Pauly. Prym varieties of spectral covers.Geom. Topol., 16(3):1609–1638, 2012

2012
[16]

N. J. Hitchin. The self-duality equations on a Riemann surface.Proc. London Math. Soc. (3), 55(1):59– 126, 1987

1987
[17]

Stable bundles and integrable systems.Duke Math

Nigel Hitchin. Stable bundles and integrable systems.Duke Math. J., 54(1):91–114, 1987

1987
[18]

Critical loci for Higgs bundles.Comm

Nigel Hitchin. Critical loci for Higgs bundles.Comm. Math. Phys., 366(2):841–864, 2019

2019
[19]

Integrable systems and special K¨ ahler metrics.EMS Surv

Nigel Hitchin. Integrable systems and special K¨ ahler metrics.EMS Surv. Math. Sci., 8(1-2):163–178, 2021

2021
[20]

Semi-abelian spectral data for singular fibres of the SL(2,C)-Hitchin system.Int

Johannes Horn. Semi-abelian spectral data for singular fibres of the SL(2,C)-Hitchin system.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (5):3860–3917, 2022

2022
[21]

Topol., 15(1):1–38, 2022

Johannes Horn.sl(2)-type singular fibres of the symplectic and odd orthogonal Hitchin system.J. Topol., 15(1):1–38, 2022

2022
[22]

Limiting configurations for solutions of Hitchin’s equation.S´ eminaire de th´ eorie spectrale et g´ eom´ etrie, 31:91–116, 2012-2014

Rafe Mazzeo, Jan Swoboda, Hartmut Weiß, and Frederik Witt. Limiting configurations for solutions of Hitchin’s equation.S´ eminaire de th´ eorie spectrale et g´ eom´ etrie, 31:91–116, 2012-2014

2012
[23]

Ends of the moduli space of Higgs bundles.Duke Math

Rafe Mazzeo, Jan Swoboda, Hartmut Weiss, and Frederik Witt. Ends of the moduli space of Higgs bundles.Duke Math. J., 165(12):2227–2271, 2016

2016
[24]

Asymptotic geometry of the Hitchin metric.Comm

Rafe Mazzeo, Jan Swoboda, Hartmut Weiss, and Frederik Witt. Asymptotic geometry of the Hitchin metric.Comm. Math. Phys., 367(1):151–191, 2019

2019
[25]

Asymptotic behaviour of certain families of harmonic bundles on Riemann surfaces

Takuro Mochizuki. Asymptotic behaviour of certain families of harmonic bundles on Riemann surfaces. J. Topol., 9(4):1021–1073, 2016

2016
[27]

Comparison of the Hitchin metric and the semi-flat metric in the rank two case

Takuro Mochizuki. Comparison of the Hitchin metric and the semi-flat metric in the rank two case. Preprint arXiv:2407.05188, 2024

2024 arXiv
[28]

Semi-flat metrics of the moduli spaces of Higgs bundles in the non-zero degree case

Takuro Mochizuki. Semi-flat metrics of the moduli spaces of Higgs bundles in the non-zero degree case. Preprint arXiv:2501.12741, 2025

2025 arXiv
[29]

Asymptotic behaviour of large-scale solutions of Hitchin’s equa- tions in higher rank.Moduli, 2:44, 2025

Takuro Mochizuki and Szil´ ard Szab´ o. Asymptotic behaviour of large-scale solutions of Hitchin’s equa- tions in higher rank.Moduli, 2:44, 2025

2025
[30]

Moduli space of semistable pairs on a curve.Proc

Nitin Nitsure. Moduli space of semistable pairs on a curve.Proc. London Math. Soc. (3), 62(2):275–300, 1991. 41

1991
[31]

C. S. Seshadri. Space of unitary vector bundles on a compact Riemann surface.Ann. of Math. (2), 85:303–336, 1967

1967
[32]

Carlos T. Simpson. Harmonic bundles on noncompact curves.J. Amer. Math. Soc., 3(3):713–770, 1990

1990
[33]

Carlos T. Simpson. Higgs bundles and local systems.Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. Publ. Math., (75):5–95, 1992

1992
[34]

Carlos T. Simpson. Moduli of representations of the fundamental group of a smooth projective variety. I.Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. Publ. Math., (79):47–129, 1994

1994
[35]

PSL(2;C) connections on 3-manifolds with L 2 bounds on curvature.Camb

Clifford Henry Taubes. PSL(2;C) connections on 3-manifolds with L 2 bounds on curvature.Camb. J. Math., 1(2):239–397, 2013. Email address:sqhe@amss.ac.cn Morningside Center of Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190 China Email address:horn@math.uni-frankfurt...

2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [26]

Asymptotic behaviour of the Hitchin metric on the moduli space of Higgs bundles

Takuro Mochizuki. Asymptotic behaviour of the Hitchin metric on the moduli space of Higgs bundles. Preprint arXiv:2305.17638, 2023

arXiv 2023

[2] [15]

The algebraic and analytic compactifications of the Hitchin moduli space.Moduli, 1:Paper No

Siqi He, Rafe Mazzeo, Xuesen Na, and Richard Wentworth. The algebraic and analytic compactifications of the Hitchin moduli space.Moduli, 1:Paper No. e2, 45, 2024

work page 2024

[3] [1]

Arnaud Beauville, M. S. Narasimhan, and S. Ramanan. Spectral curves and the generalised theta divisor.J. Reine Angew. Math., 398:169–179, 1989

1989

[4] [2]

The image inM g of strata of meromorphic and quadratic differentials.Math

Andrei Bud. The image inM g of strata of meromorphic and quadratic differentials.Math. Z., 298(3- 4):975–988, 2021

work page 2021

[5] [3]

Asymptotic geometry of the moduli space of rank two irregular Higgs bundles over the projective line.Preprint arXiv:2206.11883, 2022

Gao Chen and Nianzi Li. Asymptotic geometry of the moduli space of rank two irregular Higgs bundles over the projective line.Preprint arXiv:2206.11883, 2022

arXiv 2022

[6] [4]

Asymptotics of Higgs bundles in the Hitchin component.Adv

Brian Collier and Qiongling Li. Asymptotics of Higgs bundles in the Hitchin component.Adv. Math., 307:488–558, 2017. 40

work page 2017

[7] [5]

P. R. Cook. Compactified Jacobians and curves with simple singularities. InAlgebraic geometry. Pre- sented at EUROPROJ conferences at Catania 1993/Barcelona 1994, pages 37–47. 1998

work page 1993

[8] [6]

Compactification of generalised Jacobians.Proc

Cyril D’Souza. Compactification of generalised Jacobians.Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Sect. A Math. Sci., 88(5):419–457, 1979

work page 1979