Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 54 references

Existence and multiplicity of normalized solutions for the generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in $\mathbb{R}^2$

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Prescribed-mass solitary waves exist for the generalized Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation in two dimensions, with the mass-critical exponent at $q=\tfrac{10}{3}$, and a small-mass regime admits a second positive-energy solution.

desk verdict Genuine first step on normalized KP with a solid subcritical half, but the supercritical Theorem 1.3 rests on a false limit in Lemma 4.9 and needs real repair. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04967 v1 pith:YA67ITQV submitted 2025-06-05 math.AP

Claudianor O. Alves , Rui Ding , Chao Ji This is my paper
classification math.AP MSC 35A1535A18
keywords Kadomtsev-PetviashviliequationnormalizedsolutionsprescribedL2normgroundstateGagliardo-NirenberginequalityPohozaevidentitymountainpasstheoremvariationalmethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Under a prescribed $L^2$-norm constraint, the generalized Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation in $\mathbb{R}^2$ is studied as a variational problem on the sphere $S(a)=\{u\in X:\|u\|_2=a\}$, with the frequency $\lambda$ left free. The paper claims that for the pure power nonlinearity $f(t)=|t|^{q-2}t$ there is a normalized ground state for every mass $a>0$ when $2

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the scaling $H(u,t)=e^t u(e^{2t/3}x,e^{4t/3}y)$, which preserves $\|u\|_2$ and turns the quadratic and nonlinear terms into exponentials $e^{4t/3}$ and $e^{(q-2)t}$; the Pohozaev set $\mathcal{P}(a)=\{u\in S(a):P(u)=0\}$ with $P(u)=\frac{2}{3}\|u\|_0^2-\frac{q-2}{q}\int_{\mathbb{R}^2}|u|^q\,dx\,dy$, whose vanishing controls every critical point; and the Gagliardo–Nirenberg inequality $|u|_q^q\le C_q\,|u|_2^{(1-\beta)q}\|u\|_0^{\beta q}$ with $\beta=\frac{3}{2}-\frac{3}{q}$, which fixes $q=\frac{10}{3}$ as the mass-critical exponent. The mountain-pass level $\gamma(a)=\inf_{u\in\mathcal{P}(a)}J(u)$ and its strict subadditivity $\gamma(\theta a)<\theta^2\gamma(a)$ for $\theta>1$ are what rule out bubble splitting in the supercritical compactness argument.

What would settle it

Solve the Pohozaev equation $\frac{2}{3}e^{4t/3}\theta^2\|u\|_0^2-\frac{q-2}{q}e^{(q-2)t}\theta^q|u|_q^q=0$ for $t=t(n,\theta)$ along a sequence with $P(u_n)\to0$ and $\|u_n\|_0$ bounded below; if the limit of $t(n,\theta)$ is not $0$ for some $\theta>1$, the strict inequality in Lemma 4.9 is not established, and the supercritical compactness argument lacks its ruling-out of bubble splitting.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the mass-constrained dichotomy familiar from the nonlinear Schrödinger equation persists for the generalized KP equation, with the $L^2$-critical exponent replaced by $q=\frac{10}{3}$. Below this exponent the energy functional $J$ is coercive on $S(a)$, so a global minimizer yields a ground state $u\in S(a)$ with $\lambda<0$ and $J(u)=\Upsilon_a<0$; above it $J$ is unbounded below, and a mountain-pass argument on the scaled family $H(u,t)=e^t u(e^{2t/3}x,e^{4t/3}y)$ produces a Palais–Smale sequence whose Pohozaev constraint $P(u)=0$ ensures boundedness, leading to a ground state at level $\gamma(a)$. At $q=\frac{10}{3}$, the Pohozaev identity combined with the sharp Gagliardo–Nirenberg inequality forces $u\equiv0$ whenever $a\le a^*$, giving the nonexistence threshold. For combined powers, a local minimization over $V(a)=S(a)\cap\{\|u\|_0<\rho_0\}$ yields the negative-energy ground state, and a mountain-pass lemma supplies a second critical point with positive energy for a sequence $a_n\to0$.

Load-bearing premise

The supercritical compactness argument depends on Lemma 4.9's assertion that the unique parameter $t(n,\theta)$ with $P(H(\theta u_n,t(n,\theta)))=0$ tends to $0$ as $n\to\infty$; the paper states this without proof, and direct asymptotic analysis of the Pohozaev equation suggests $t(n,\theta)\to\frac{2-q}{q-10/3}\ln\theta<0$ for $\theta>1$, which would leave the strict subadditivity $\gamma(\theta a)<\theta^2\gamma(a)$ unproved.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any prescribed mass $a>0$, the supercritical problem has a ground-state solitary wave with negative Lagrange multiplier $\lambda$, so the travelling-wave speed is determined by the mass alone.
  • At the critical exponent $q=\frac{10}{3}$, there is no nontrivial solution with mass $a\le a^*$; the dividing line is the sharp constant in the Gagliardo–Nirenberg inequality.
  • For the combined nonlinearity, masses below $a_0$ admit a negative-energy ground state, and along a sequence of masses $a_n\to0$ the problem has a second, positive-energy solution.
  • The variational identity $\gamma(a)=\inf_{u\in\mathcal{P}(a)}J(u)$ gives an exact energy formula, making the ground-state energy a function of mass that can be compared across different masses.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the results hold, the natural next step is to study orbital stability of these fixed-mass KP waves under the time-dependent KP flow, since the $L^2$-constraint is exactly the conserved momentum.
  • The critical-mass threshold suggests a sharp quantitative transition: as $a$ approaches $a^*$ from the nonexistence side, some branch of solutions may concentrate or disappear, a phenomenon one could probe numerically by continuation in $a$.
  • The second-solution result is proved only along a sequence $a_n\to0$, not for every small $a$; a more delicate splitting argument might remove that restriction, but the paper leaves it open.
  • Because the Pohozaev identity is decisive, extending this normalized-solution program to $\mathbb{R}^N$ with $N\ge3$ requires regularity conditions for the identity to hold, so the higher-dimensional problem is not merely a transcription of the two-dimensional proof.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies the existence and multiplicity of normalized solutions (solutions with prescribed L^2 norm) for the generalized Kadomtsev--Petviashvili equation in R^2. For the pure power nonlinearity f(t)=|t|^{q-2}t, the authors prove existence of normalized ground states for the L^2-subcritical range 2<q<10/3, nonexistence for the L^2-critical exponent q=10/3 when the mass is below a threshold, and existence for the L^2-supercritical range 10/3<q<6. For the combined nonlinearity f(t)=mu|t|^{q-2}t+|t|^{p-2}t with 2<q<10/3<p<6, they prove existence of a negative-energy ground state for small mass, and, along a sequence of masses tending to zero, a second positive-energy solution. The methods combine a Gagliardo--Nirenberg inequality adapted to the anisotropic space X, a Pohozaev identity, a special scaling H(u,t), mountain-pass arguments, and concentration-compactness. The subcritical and combined-nonlinearity parts appear coherent; the supercritical compactness proof relies on Lemma 4.9, which contains a false asymptotic assertion and therefore leaves Theorem 1.3 unproved as written.

Significance. This appears to be the first paper to treat normalized solutions for the generalized Kadomtsev--Petviashvili equation, and the adaptation of the Jeanjean/Soave machinery to a non-radial, anisotropic setting is a genuine and useful contribution. The Gagliardo--Nirenberg inequality in Lemma 2.1 and the Pohozaev identity are correctly derived, and no circularity is apparent: the arguments use standard variational tools and cited estimates, not the desired conclusion. If the gap in Lemma 4.9 is repaired, the results would be significant and of interest to the PDE community. As printed, however, the central supercritical existence theorem is not established because its compactness argument depends on a false limit.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4, Lemma 4.9] The assertion that t(n,theta) -> 0 as n -> infinity is false. Let A_n = integral(|(u_n)_x|^2 + |D_x^{-1}(u_n)_y|^2) and B_n = integral(|u_n|^q). The condition P(u_n) -> 0 gives (2/3)A_n - ((q-2)/q)B_n -> 0, so A_n/B_n -> 3(q-2)/(2q). The equation P(H(theta u_n, t(n,theta))) = 0 reads (2/3)theta^2 e^{4t/3}A_n = ((q-2)/q)theta^q e^{(q-2)t}B_n, whence e^{(q-10/3)t(n,theta)} = (2q A_n)/(3(q-2)B_n) theta^{2-q}. Taking the limit gives t(n,theta) -> (2-q)/(q-10/3) ln(theta), which is a negative constant for theta>1, not zero. This invalidates the statement "from (4.24), we have t(n,theta) -> 0".
  2. [§4, Eq. (4.25) and proof of Theorem 1.3] Because t(n,theta) does not tend to zero, the identity theta^2 J(H(u_n,t(n,theta))) = theta^2 J(u_n) + o_n(1) in (4.25) is unjustified, and in fact J(H(u_n,t(n,theta))) does not converge to J(u_n). Consequently the derivation of gamma(theta a) <= theta^2 gamma(a), and hence the strict subadditivity gamma(a) < sum gamma(a_i) used to rule out bubble splitting in the proof of Theorem 1.3, is not established. This is a load-bearing gap: Lemma 4.9 is the only mechanism excluding the case ell >= 1 in the concentration-compactness decomposition. A corrected asymptotic such as J(H(theta u_n, t(n,theta))) ~ theta^{alpha} J(u_n) with alpha = (2/3)(q-6)/(q-10/3) < 2 may allow a repair of the strict subadditivity, but the proof as printed is incomplete.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4, Lemma 4.8] The index in the statement of Lemma 4.8 is inconsistent: (4.21) involves a_j = |u_j|_2 for j = 0,...,ell, but the mass identity is written as a^2 = sum_{i=1}^{ell} b_i^2, and b_i is never defined. The intended identity should be a^2 = sum_{i=0}^{ell} |u_i|_2^2.
  2. [§4, after Lemma 4.1] The line "there exists 1 <0 and s_2 >0" contains a typo: it should read "there exists s_1 < 0 and s_2 > 0", and the subsequent definitions should be u_1 = H(u_0, s_1) and u_2 = H(u_0, s_2).
  3. [§4, Eq. (4.3)] Equation (4.3) states integral |D_x^{-1}(H(u,t))_y|^2 = e^{4t/3} integral |u|^2, but the correct formula is e^{4t/3} integral |D_x^{-1} u_y|^2. As printed, the claimed decay as t -> -infty would not follow; the intended scaling is correct, but the displayed equation is misleading.
  4. [Abstract and Section 1] The phrase "which we refer to them as the normalized solutions" is ungrammatical; it should be "which we refer to as normalized solutions."

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the main theorems rest on external variational machinery and a directly derived Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality, with only a minor non-load-bearing self-citation for a routine Pohozaev identity. The serious gap in Lemma 4.9 is a false limit, not a circularity.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks. Lemma 2.1 proves the Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality by interpolation from the Sobolev-type inequality (2.5), cited to Xuan [52]; the mountain-pass setup is adapted from Jeanjean [32], and the splitting lemma is modeled on Wang-Willem [49]. These are external sources and none of them contains the paper's main existence theorem. The only self-citation that enters the proof chain is [9] (Alves-Figueiredo-Montenegro, with current author Alves) in Lemma 4.4, used for the Pohozaev identity (4.18). That identity is a routine consequence of testing the equation with the infinitesimal scaling generator; it is parameter-free, does not assume the target result, and can be verified independently. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no ansatz is imported through a self-citation, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked. I therefore assign a score of 1 for the single minor, non-load-bearing self-citation. Separately, as a correctness issue rather than a circularity, the manuscript's Lemma 4.9 asserts 'from (4.24), we have t(n,θ)→0 as n→+∞.' Direct asymptotic analysis of P(H(θu_n,t))=0 using P(u_n)→0 gives e^{(q-10/3)t(n,θ)} = (2qA_n/(3(q-2)B_n)) θ^{2-q}, so t(n,θ)→(2-q)/(q-10/3) lnθ < 0 for θ>1. Hence the o_n(1) replacement in (4.25) is not justified. This is a load-bearing gap in the proof of Theorem 1.3 as printed, but it is a false asymptotic claim, not a circular reduction to the paper's inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities or fitted parameters. Its assumptions are standard analytical tools from the cited literature.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Embedding X into L^6 with constant S (Xuan's lemma)
    Quoted from [52, Lemma 2.2] and used to derive the Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality (2.6).
  • standard math Concentration-compactness splitting lemma for bounded PS sequences in X (Lemma 4.8)
    Adapted from [49, Lemma 5] and [50]; used to analyze loss of compactness.
  • domain assumption Pohozaev identity for weak solutions of the generalized KP equation
    Cited from [9, Lemma 2.3] and used in Lemma 4.4 and the critical case.
  • standard math Jeanjean's Proposition 2.2 existence of PS sequences for the auxiliary functional
    Imported from [32] and used to generate the PS sequence in the supercritical case.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Existence and multiplicity of normalized solutions for the generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in $\mathbb{R}^2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YA67ITQV

@misc{pith2026250604967,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Existence and multiplicity of normalized solutions for the generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in $\mathbbR^2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YA67ITQV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04967}
}
abstract

In this paper, we study the existence and {multiplicity} of nontrivial solitary waves for the generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation with prescribed {$L^2$-norm} \begin{equation*}\label{Equation1} \left\{\begin{array}{l} \left(-u_{x x}+D_x^{-2} u_{y y}+\lambda u-f(u)\right)_x=0,{\quad x \in \mathbb{R}^2, } \\[10pt] \displaystyle \int_{\mathbb{R}^2}u^2 d x=a^2, \end{array}\right.%\tag{$\mathscr E_\lambda$} \end{equation*} where $a>0$ and $\lambda \in \mathbb{R}$ is an unknown parameter that appears as a Lagrange multiplier. For the case $f(t)=|t|^{q-2}t$, with $2<q<\frac{10}{3}$ ($L^2$-subcritical case) and $\frac{10}{3}<q<6$ ($L^2$-supercritical case), we establish the existence of normalized ground state solutions for the above equation. Moreover, when $f(t)=\mu|t|^{q-2}t+|t|^{p-2}t$, with $2<q<\frac{10}{3}<p<6$ and $\mu>0$, we prove the existence of normalized ground state solutions which corresponds to a local minimum of the associated energy functional. In this case, we further show that there exists a sequence $(a_n) \subset (0,a_0)$ with $a_n \to 0$ as $n \to+\infty$, such that for each $a=a_n$, the problem admits a second solution with positive energy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that studies the existence of solutions for the generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equations under the $L^2$-constraint, which we refer to them as the normalized solutions.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Alves,On existence of multiple normalized solutions to a class of elliptic problems in wholeR N ,Z

    C.O. Alves,On existence of multiple normalized solutions to a class of elliptic problems in wholeR N ,Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 73 (2022), no. 3, Paper No. 97, 17 pp. 4

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Alves, C

    C.O. Alves, C. Ji, O.H. Miyagaki,Normalized solutions for a Schr¨ odinger equation with critical growth inR N , Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 61 (2022), no. 1, Paper No. 18, 24 pp. 4

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Alves, C

    C.O. Alves, C. Ji,Normalized solutions for the Schr¨ odinger equations withL 2-subcritical growth and different type of potentials, J. Geom. Anal., 32 (2022), no. 5, Paper No. 165, 25 pp. 4

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    To appear in J

    Alves, C.O., Shen, L.: On existence of normalized solutions to a class of elliptic problems withL 2−supercritical grow. To appear in J. Differential Equations, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2025.02.059. 4

    doi:10.1016/j.jde.2025.02.059 2025

  5. [5]

    Alves and N.V

    C.O. Alves and N.V. Thin,On existence of multiple normalized solutions to a class of elliptic problems in wholeR N via Lusternik-Schnirelmann category, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 55 (2023), no. 2, 1264–1283. 4

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Alves, C

    C.O. Alves, C. Ji,Existence and concentration of nontrivial solitary waves for a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation inR 2. J. Differential Equations368(2023), 141-172. 2

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Alves, O.H

    C.O. Alves, O.H. Miyagaki,Existence, regularity and concentration phenomenon of nontrivial solitary waves for a class of generalized variable coefficient Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation. J. Math. Phys.58(2017), 081503. 2

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Alves, O.H

    C.O. Alves, O.H. Miyagaki, A. Pomponio,Solitary waves for a class of generalized Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation inR N with positive and zero mass. J. Math. Anal. Appl.477(2019), 523–535. 2

    work page 2019

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    Alves, G.M

    C.O. Alves, G.M. Figueiredo, M. Montenegro,On the energy of the ground state solution for a generalized Kadomtsev– Petviashvili equation, Preprint. 2, 14

  2. [10]

    Bartsch, R

    T. Bartsch, R. Molle, M. Rizzi, G. Verzini,Normalized solutions of mass supercritical Schr¨ odinger equations with potential, Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 46 (2021), no. 9, 1729–1756. 4

    2021

  3. [11]

    Bartsch, N

    T. Bartsch, N. Soave,Multiple normalized solutions for a competing system of Schr¨ odinger equations, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 58 (2019), no. 1, Paper No. 22, 24 pp. 4

    2019

  4. [12]

    Bartsch, N

    T. Bartsch, N. Soave,A natural constraint approach to normalized solutions of nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations and systems, J. Func. Anal. 272 (2017), 4998-5037. 4

    2017

  5. [13]

    Bartsch, S

    T. Bartsch, S. De Valeriola,Normalized solutions of nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations, Arch. Math., 100 (2013), 75-83. 4

    2013

  6. [14]

    Bellazzini, L

    J. Bellazzini, L. Jeanjean, T. Luo,Existence and instability of standing waves with prescribed norm for a class of Schr¨ odinger-Poisson equations, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3), 107 (2013), no. 2, 303–39. 4

    2013

  7. [15]

    O. V. Besov, V. P. Il’in, S.M. Nikolski,Integral Representations of Functions and Imbedding Theorems, Volume I. Wiley, New York, (1978). 2

    1978

  8. [16]

    Bieganowski, J

    B. Bieganowski, J. Mederski,Normalized ground states of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with at least mass critical growth, J. Funct. Anal., 280 (2021), no. 11, Paper No. 108989, 26 pp. 4

    2021

  9. [17]

    Bourgain,On the Cauchy problem for the Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation

    J. Bourgain,On the Cauchy problem for the Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation. Geom. Funct. Anal.3(1993), 315–341. 2 THE GENERALIZED KADOMTSEV-PETVIASHVILI EQUATION 25

    1993

  10. [18]

    T. Cazenave,Semilinear Schr¨ odinger equations,Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematics10(New York University, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York; American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2003, 323 pp. ISBN: 0-8218-3399-5. 3, 4

    2003

  11. [19]

    Cazenave, P.L

    T. Cazenave, P.L. Lions,Orbital stability of standing waves for some nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations, Comm. Math. Phys.85(4) (1982), 549–561. 3

    1982

  12. [20]

    Chen, X.H

    S.T. Chen, X.H. Tang,Another look at Schr¨ odinger equations with prescribed mass, J. Differential Equations386 (2024), 435–479. 23

    2024

  13. [21]

    De Bouard, J.-C

    A. De Bouard, J.-C. Saut,Sur les ondes solitaires des ´ equations de Kadomtsev-Petviashvili. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 320(1995), 315–318. 2

    1995

  14. [22]

    De Bouard, J.-C

    A. De Bouard, J.-C. Saut,Solitary waves of generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equations. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e, Anal. Non Lin´ eaire14(1997), 211–236. 2

    1997

  15. [23]

    del Pino, P.L

    M. del Pino, P.L. Felmer,Local Mountain Pass for semilinear elliptic problems in unbounded domains. Cal. Var. Partial Differential Equations4(1996), 121-137. 2

    1996

  16. [24]

    Faminskii,The Cauchy problem for Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation

    A. Faminskii,The Cauchy problem for Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation. Russ. Math. Surv.5(1990), 203–204. 2

    1990

  17. [25]

    Figueiredo, M

    G. Figueiredo, M. Montenegro,Multiple solitary waves for a generalized Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation with a po- tential. J. Differential Equations308(2022), 40–56. 2

    2022

  18. [26]

    Grillakis, J

    M. Grillakis, J. Shatah, W. Strauss,Stability theory of solitary waves in the presence of symmetry: I, J. Funct. Anal.74 (1987), 160–197. 2

    1987

  19. [27]

    G¨ ung¨ or, P

    F. G¨ ung¨ or, P. Winternitz,Generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation with an infinite-dimensional symmetry algebra. J. Math. Anal. Appl.276(2002), 314–328 2

    2002

  20. [28]

    Hayashi, P.I

    N. Hayashi, P.I. Naumkin, J.-C. Saut,Asymptotics for large time of global solutions to the generalized KadomtsevPetvi- ashvili equation. Commun. Math. Phys.201(1999), 577–590. 2

    1999

  21. [29]

    X.M. He, W.M. Zou,Nontrivial solitary waves to the generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equations. Appl. Math. Com- put.197(2008), 858–863. 2

    2008

  22. [30]

    Hirata, K

    J. Hirata, K. Tanaka,Nonlinear scalar field equations withL 2 constraint: mountain pass and symmetric mountain pass approaches, Adv. Nonlinear Stud., 19 (2019), no. 2, 263–290. 4

    2019

  23. [31]

    Isaza, J

    P. Isaza, J. Mejia,Local and global Cauchy problem for the Kadomtsev-Petviashvili (KP-II) equation in Sobolev spaces of negative indices. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ.26(2001), 1027–1054. 2

    2001

  24. [32]

    Jeanjean,Existence of solutions with prescribed norm for semilinear elliptic equations, Nonlinear Anal.28(1997), 1633–1659

    L. Jeanjean,Existence of solutions with prescribed norm for semilinear elliptic equations, Nonlinear Anal.28(1997), 1633–1659. 3, 4, 10, 12, 14, 15, 17

    1997

  25. [33]

    Jeanjean, S.S

    L. Jeanjean, S.S. Lu,Nonradial normalized solutions for nonlinear scalar field equations, Nonlinearity, 32 (2019), no. 12, 4942–4966. 4

    2019

  26. [34]

    Jeanjean, S.S

    L. Jeanjean, S.S. Lu,A mass supercritical problem revisited, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 59 (2020), no. 5, Paper No. 174, 43 pp. 4

    2020

  27. [35]

    Jeanjean, S.S

    L. Jeanjean, S.S. Lu,On global minimizers for a mass constrained problem, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 61 (2022), no. 6, Paper No. 214, 18 pp 4

    2022

  28. [36]

    Jeanjean, T.T

    L. Jeanjean, T.T. Le,Multiple normalized solutions for a Sobolev critical Schr¨ odinger equations, Math. Ann., 384 (2022), no. 1–2, 101–134. 4

    2022

  29. [37]

    Jeanjean, J

    L. Jeanjean, J. Jendrej, T.T. Le, N. Visciglia,Orbital stability of ground states for a Sobolev critical Schr¨ odinger equation, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 164 (2022), 158–179. 4

    2022

  30. [38]

    Kadomtsev, V.I

    B.B. Kadomtsev, V.I. Petviashvili,On the stability of solitary waves in weakly dispersing media. Sov. Phys. Dokl.15 (1970), 539–541. 2

    1970

  31. [39]

    Liang, J.B

    Z.P. Liang, J.B. Su,Existence of solitary waves to a generalized Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation. Acta Math. Sci.32 (2012), 1149–1156. 2

    2012

  32. [40]

    Lions,The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations

    P.-L. Lions,The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations. The locally compact case, part 2, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire1(1984), 223–283. 2, 22

    1984

  33. [41]

    Petviashvili, V

    V. Petviashvili, V. Yan’kov,Solitons and turbulence, in B. B. Kadomtsev (ed.), Rev. Plasma Phys.14(1989), 1–62. 2

    1989

  34. [42]

    Saut,Recent results on the generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equations

    J.-C. Saut,Recent results on the generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equations. Acta Appl. Math.39(1995), 1477–1487. 2

    1995

  35. [43]

    Shibata,Stable standing waves of nonlinear Schrodinger equations with a general nonlinear term, Manuscripta Math.143(2014), 221–237

    M. Shibata,Stable standing waves of nonlinear Schrodinger equations with a general nonlinear term, Manuscripta Math.143(2014), 221–237. 3

    2014

  36. [44]

    Soave,Normalized ground states for the NLS equation with combined nonlinearities: the Sobolev critical case, J

    N. Soave,Normalized ground states for the NLS equation with combined nonlinearities: the Sobolev critical case, J. Funct. Anal., 279 (2020), no. 6, 108610, 43 pp. 4

    2020

  37. [45]

    Soave,Normalized ground states for the NLS equation with combined nonlinearities, J

    N. Soave,Normalized ground states for the NLS equation with combined nonlinearities, J. Differential Equations269 (2020), 6941–6987. 5

    2020

  38. [46]

    Szulkin, W.M

    A. Szulkin, W.M. Zou,Homoclinic orbit for asymptotically linear Hamiltonian systems. J. Funct. Anal.187(2001), 25–41. 2 26 C.O. AL VES, R. DING, AND C. JI

    2001

  39. [47]

    Tian, Y.T

    B. Tian, Y.T. Gao,Solutions of a variable-coefficient Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation via computer algebra. Appl. Math. Comput.84(1997), 125–130. 2

    1997

  40. [48]

    Tzvetkov,Global low regularity solutions for Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equations

    N. Tzvetkov,Global low regularity solutions for Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equations. Differ. Integral Equ.13(2000), 1289–1320. 2

    2000

  41. [49]

    Z.-Q. Wang, M. Willem,A multiplicity result for the generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation. Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal.7(1996), 261–270. 2, 15

    1996

  42. [50]

    Willem,Minimax Theorems

    M. Willem,Minimax Theorems. Birkh¨ auser, 1996. 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12

    1996

  43. [51]

    J. Xu, Z. Wei, Y. Ding,Stationary solutions for a generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in bounded domain. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ.68(2012), 1–18. 2

    2012

  44. [52]

    Xuan,Nontrivial solitary waves of GKP equation in multi-dimensional spaces

    B. Xuan,Nontrivial solitary waves of GKP equation in multi-dimensional spaces. Rev. Colombiana Mat.37(2003), 11–23. 2, 6

    2003

  45. [53]

    Zhang, Y

    Y. Zhang, Y. Xu, K. Ma,New type of a generalized variable-coefficient Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation with self- consistent sources and its Grammian-type solutions. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul.37(2016), 77–89. 2

    2016

  46. [54]

    Zou,Solitary waves of the generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equations

    W.M. Zou,Solitary waves of the generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equations. Appl. Math. Lett.15(2002), 35–39. 2 (C.O. Alves) Unidade Acadˆemica de Matem´atica Universidade Federal de Campina Grande PB CEP:58429-900, Brazil Email address:coalves@mat.ufcg.edu.br (R. Ding) Schoo...

    2002

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.