Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 47 references

Exciton-polaritons in a monolayer semiconductor coupled to van der Waals dielectric nanoantennas on a metallic mirror

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Monolayer WSe2 on a 27-nm WS2 nanoantenna over a gold mirror forms room-temperature Mie-polaritons with a Rabi splitting above 80 meV and nonlinear polariton shifts up to 20 meV.

desk verdict A credible demonstration of room-temperature Mie-polaritons in a monolayer TMD, with a nonlinearity claim that needs more scrutiny. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04979 v1 pith:TLJC3P56 submitted 2025-06-05 physics.optics

Yadong Wang , Charalambos Louca , Sam Randerson , Xuerong Hu , Panaiot G. Zotev , Oscar Palma Chaundler , Paul Bouteyre , Casey K. Cheung
show 3 more authors
Roman Gorbachev Yue Wang Alexander I. Tartakovskii
This is my paper
classification physics.optics
keywords exciton-polaritonsMieresonancesvanderWaalsnanoantennasstrongcouplingmonolayerWSe2goldmirrorRabisplittingnonlinearpolaritons
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Strong coupling normally needs a cavity or a collective array; this paper claims to get it from a single, 27-nm-tall WS2 nanoantenna sitting on a gold mirror, with the monolayer WSe2 simply placed on top. The gold mirror is the key element: it pushes the electric-dipole Mie mode's field out of the antenna toward the top surface, giving about 130 times more field there than on SiO2, so an externally placed monolayer can couple. The result is an anti-crossing between the WSe2 exciton and the Mie mode, with a Rabi splitting of 86±5 meV in dark-field scattering, 78±6 meV in reflectance contrast, and 85.4±0.47 meV in FDTD simulation. The paper also reports that these Mie-polaritons are an order of magnitude more nonlinear than the bare exciton, with a ~20 meV blueshift of the lower polariton at 145 µJ/cm2 and collapse of the splitting to ~0.7 of its low-power value. If correct, this makes single dielectric nanoantennas on mirrors a compact platform for room-temperature strong light-matter coupling with arbitrary monolayers.

What carries the argument

The central object is the electric-dipole Mie mode of a 27-nm-thick WS2 nanoantenna sitting on a gold film; the gold mirror hybridizes with it and redistributes the mode so that high field intensity appears above the antenna's top face. The argument is carried by the size-tunable Mie resonance: changing the nanoantenna radius tunes the electric-dipole mode through the WSe2 exciton energy, producing an anti-crossing that is fitted with a two-level coupled-oscillator Hamiltonian (one photonic mode, one exciton) whose Rabi splitting is the extracted coupling metric. In FDTD, the same geometry is modelled with a monolayer WSe2 wrapped around the antenna, reproducing the splitting (85.4±0.47 meV) and showing that the bare mode's field is split between upper and lower polaritons. A comparison structure on SiO2 shows no strong coupling, which the paper attributes to the gold mirror's field redistribution.

What would settle it

Measure dark-field spectra of the monolayer-covered antennas over a finer radius series and fit them with a three-mode model (exciton, electric-dipole Mie, Mie-plasmonic): if the upper fitted branch tracks the Mie-plasmonic mode's dispersion rather than the two-mode anticrossing, the strong-coupling claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that a hybrid van der Waals dielectric-metal nanoantenna can reach the strong-coupling regime at room temperature with an exciton in a monolayer that is placed on the antenna externally rather than grown into it. The structure is a 27-nm WS2 nanoantenna on a gold film, covered by a monolayer WSe2 that conforms to the antenna. The gold substrate both raises the Q factor of the electric-dipole Mie resonance and moves its near field to the top surface of the antenna, so the WSe2 exciton at about 1.668 eV couples to the Mie mode; as the antenna radius tunes the Mie energy through the exciton, the two measured spectral features anti-cross with a Rabi splitting above 80 meV. Under pulsed excitation the polariton branches shift up to 20 meV, the splitting falls to about 70% of its low-fluence value, and the inferred oscillator-strength change is at least an order of magnitude larger than in the bare monolayer, reversibly and without damage. The paper takes this as evidence that the hybrid WS2/gold nanoantenna is a viable building block for compact room-temperature polaritonics.

Load-bearing premise

The strongest conclusion rests on the assumption that the two spectral features tracked across antenna radii and laser fluences are just the lower and upper polariton branches of one Mie mode coupled to one exciton, with the higher-energy Mie-plasmonic mode contributing nothing to the fits.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Each individual WS2/gold nanoantenna acts as a stand-alone strongly coupled cavity for a monolayer placed on top, so no periodic array or collective resonance is required to reach a Rabi splitting above 80 meV.
  • The gold mirror is not just a reflector but the enabling element: replacing it with SiO2 removes the strong coupling in simulation, so the metal-backed van der Waals geometry is the essence of the platform.
  • The Mie-polariton nonlinearity is large enough for ~20 meV branch shifts at 145 µJ/cm2 and an inferred reduction of the effective exciton oscillator strength to about half its low-fluence value, while the bare monolayer shifts by less than 2 meV over the same excitation range.
  • Because the monolayer is transferred on top after the antenna is fabricated, the same platform can be applied to other monolayer or few-layer emitters without changing the nanoantenna fabrication.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This reader's extension: because the emitter is placed on top after fabrication rather than patterned, the platform should extend to other exfoliated monolayers, defect emitters, or molecules, making it a general testbed for room-temperature strong coupling.
  • A testable extension of the nonlinearity result: a time-resolved pump-probe measurement of the branch positions and linewidths at 145 µJ/cm2 would separate a genuine drop in coupling strength from power-induced broadening of unresolved peaks.
  • The reversible ~30% reduction of the normalized Rabi splitting under pulsed excitation suggests an all-optical modulation scheme, although the merging of the branches at high fluence makes the usable switching contrast an open question.
  • Varying the WS2 thickness or the residual gold pedestal height should allow deliberate engineering of the mode volume and the field enhancement, giving a parameter knob for the Rabi splitting beyond the 80 meV demonstrated here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports room-temperature exciton-polaritons formed by coupling the exciton in a monolayer WSe2 to the electric-dipole Mie resonance of individual WS2 nanoantennas placed on a gold mirror. Rabi splittings of 86±5 meV (dark-field), 78±6 meV (reflectance contrast), and 85.4±0.47 meV (FDTD) are extracted from anti-crossing fits. The authors further claim that the Mie-polaritons exhibit nonlinearity one order of magnitude larger than the bare monolayer exciton, with up to 20 meV lower-polariton blueshift at 145 µJ/cm2.

Significance. If the strong-coupling observation holds, the demonstration is significant: it extends Mie-polariton strong coupling to externally placed monolayers using a compact van der Waals dielectric-metal platform, and it is supported by two independent experimental techniques plus a forward FDTD simulation using literature optical constants. The central anti-crossing evidence is credible and the FDTD simulation is a strength because it is a forward model without fitting to the target result. The nonlinearity claim, however, is not established by the present data, and the order-of-magnitude statement should be moderated or supported by additional analysis.

major comments (4)
  1. [Nonlinearity of Mie-polaritons, Fig. 4] The quantitative reduction of Ω/Ωmax to 0.7 is obtained from bi-Lorentzian fits of spectra in which, as stated in the text, 'the LP and UP peaks cannot be resolved' at high fluences. In this regime the two-peak fit is not uniquely constrained, so the extracted peak positions and the resulting Ω values are not reliable. The authors should either restrict the claim to fluences where the branches are resolved, or provide model-independent evidence, such as second-derivative analysis or a comparison of single-resonance versus two-resonance fits with goodness-of-fit metrics.
  2. [Nonlinearity of Mie-polaritons and SI coupled-oscillator model] The conversion Ω/Ωmax ∝ sqrt(f/f0) implicitly assumes that the linewidths γph and γX remain constant with fluence. However, SI Eq. (5) shows that the observable splitting depends on |γph − γX| as well as on g, so an increase in the linewidth difference at high fluence (e.g., from local heating) would reduce Ω even if the coupling strength were unchanged. The paper does not report fluence-dependent linewidths of the polariton branches, nor a bare-NA control under identical pulsed excitation, nor a test against the alternative of a single broadened resonance. The attribution of the observed Ω reduction to a 51% reduction in exciton oscillator strength is therefore not unique, and this is load-bearing for the order-of-magnitude nonlinearity claim.
  3. [Fig. 2 and SI coupled-oscillator model] For NA radii above approximately 127 nm, the bare NAs exhibit an additional Mie-plasmonic (MP) mode (Fig. 1e), but the coupled-oscillator model in the SI includes only one photonic mode. The authors should justify that the upper fitted feature assigned to the upper polariton branch is not the MP mode, for example by comparing fitted branch energies with the bare-NA spectra in Fig. S5 and with the FDTD spectra that include the monolayer. This is important for the anti-crossing interpretation for the largest radii, where the MP mode is present.
  4. [Strong-coupling criterion, Fig. 2e-f] The paper states the strong-coupling condition as ħΩR > (γ0 + γMie)/2. For the RC measurement, the reported Ω = 78 ± 6 meV is compared with a threshold of approximately 74 meV, so the inequality is not satisfied within the reported uncertainty. The authors should propagate the uncertainties in Ω, γ0, and γMie and state explicitly which criterion (e.g., SI Eq. 5) is used to conclude strong coupling, since the RC measurement alone is borderline.
minor comments (4)
  1. [SI coupled-oscillator model] The SI text refers to 'Fig.3 of the main text' for the DF/RC fits, but those fits are shown in Fig. 2d/f; Fig. 3 is the FDTD simulation. The cross-reference should be corrected.
  2. [Fig. S7] The Fig. S7 caption lists powers from 5 nW to 20 µW, whereas the main text reports incident average powers from 12 nW to 900 nW for the same fluence range. Please reconcile these numbers or clarify the difference.
  3. [Methods] The Methods section contains minor typographical errors, such as 'using a electron lithography', which should read 'using an electron lithography process'.
  4. [Abstract] The abstract states a Rabi splitting above 80 meV, but the RC value is 78 ± 6 meV. Please qualify the statement, for example by referring to the DF and FDTD values, or specify that the 'above 80 meV' claim refers to those measurements.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central strong-coupling and FDTD results are derived from independent forward simulations and standard fits, not from fitted inputs renamed as predictions.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are self-contained against external benchmarks. The Rabi splittings in Fig. 2d/f are obtained by fitting measured dark-field and reflectance-contrast peak positions with a standard coupled-oscillator Hamiltonian (SI Eqs. 2-5); this is a conventional parameter extraction, not a prediction that reduces to its inputs. The FDTD simulation in Fig. 3 uses refractive indices taken from independent spectroscopic ellipsometry (ref. 24 for WS2, ref. 45 for WSe2, ref. 46 for gold) and is a forward model that is not fitted to the experimental splitting, so the resulting 85.4 meV Rabi splitting is independent supporting evidence. Same-group citations (refs. 24 and 38) provide material constants and a mode classification (ED vs. MP), but these are independent measurements/classifications rather than load-bearing circular self-citations; the coupled-oscillator fit does not depend on those references for its mathematical content. The nonlinearity claim converts an observed reduction in fitted splitting to an oscillator-strength reduction via the explicit model relation Omega/Omega_max proportional to sqrt(f/f0); this is an interpretive step, and the fact that the LP/UP branches cannot be resolved at the highest fluences is a robustness/correctness concern, not a circularity. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no 'uniqueness theorem' or self-citation chain is invoked to forbid alternative interpretations. The derivation chain is therefore not circular; concerns about the nonlinearity extraction belong to experimental uncertainty rather than to circular reasoning.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Central claims rest on standard electromagnetism (FDTD) and coupled oscillator analysis. No new physical entities are postulated. Several parameters (Rabi splitting, linewidths, pedestal height) are fitted to or calibrated on the same sample, and the nonlinearity interpretation additionally assumes oscillator-strength scaling with mode volume.

free parameters (6)
  • Rabi splitting Omega_DF = 86 ± 5 meV
    Fitted from dark-field polariton branch positions versus NA radius using the coupled oscillator model (Fig. 2d).
  • Rabi splitting Omega_RC = 78 ± 6 meV
    Fitted from reflectance-contrast spectra via two Lorentzians and the coupled oscillator model (Fig. 2f).
  • Rabi splitting Omega_FDTD = 85.4 ± 0.47 meV
    Extracted by Lorentzian fits to FDTD scattering spectra, then a coupled oscillator fit (Fig. 3b).
  • Exciton linewidth gamma_X = 56 ± 3 meV
    Extracted from reflectance-contrast measurements of monolayer WSe2 on gold (main text).
  • Mie linewidth gamma_Mie = 92 ± 2 meV
    Extracted from dark-field spectra of bare WS2 nanoantennas near the anti-crossing (main text).
  • NA height and gold pedestal = 27 nm WS2 plus 3 nm Au
    Geometric input to FDTD chosen from the fabrication over-etch; reproduces experimental scattering (Fig. S1).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption A two-level coupled oscillator Hamiltonian with complex energies describes the coupled exciton-Mie system (SI Eqs. 2-5).
    Used to define Rabi splitting and the strong-coupling criterion; assumes no coupling to other modes.
  • domain assumption Lorentzian peak shapes adequately represent DF and RC spectral features.
    All peak positions are extracted by Lorentzian or bi-Lorentzian fits (Fig. 2c,e and Fig. S7).
  • domain assumption FDTD with refractive indices from Refs. [24], [45], [46] and the wrapped-cylinder monolayer geometry reproduces the physical system.
    Used to model field distributions and predict the Rabi splitting; assumes optical constants of the transferred monolayer equal literature values.
  • domain assumption The low-energy resonance is an electric-dipole Mie mode (ED) and the high-energy resonance is a Mie-plasmonic mode (MP) as in Ref. [38].
    Mode assignment determines which resonance couples to the WSe2 exciton.
  • domain assumption The integrated RC exciton intensity is proportional to exciton oscillator strength, and g is proportional to sqrt(f_X/V) with constant mode volume.
    Underlies the nonlinearity inference Omega/Omega_max proportional to sqrt(f/f0) in the nonlinearity section.
  • domain assumption The monolayer WSe2 conformally wraps the NA as modeled and measured by AFM.
    Used in FDTD and in explaining why an external monolayer can couple to the Mie mode.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exciton-polaritons in a monolayer semiconductor coupled to van der Waals dielectric nanoantennas on a metallic mirror." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TLJC3P56

@misc{pith2026250604979,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exciton-polaritons in a monolayer semiconductor coupled to van der Waals dielectric nanoantennas on a metallic mirror},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TLJC3P56}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04979}
}
abstract

Polaritons in nanophotonic structures have attracted long-standing interest owing to their fundamental importance and potential for applications in nonlinear and quantum optics. Nanoantennas (NAs) made from high refractive index dielectrics offer a suitable platform for polariton physics thanks to the strongly confined optical Mie resonances and low optical losses in contrast to metallic NAs. However, Mie modes are mainly confined within the NA, making inefficient their coupling with excitons in materials deposited externally. Here, we overcome this limitation by using a high-refractive index van der Waals material WS$_2$, which allows straightforward fabrication of NAs on gold. The combination of a 27 nm tall WS$_2$ NA and a gold substrate enables strong modification of the Mie mode distribution and field enhancement inside and in the vicinity of the NA. This allows observation of room-temperature Mie-polaritons (with a Rabi splitting above 80 meV) arising from the strong coupling between Mie modes and the exciton in a monolayer WSe$_2$ placed on WS$_2$/gold NAs. We demonstrate strong nonlinearity of Mie-polaritons, one order of magnitude higher than for excitons in monolayer WSe$_2$ on gold. Our results highlight applicability of van der Waals materials for the realisation of hybrid dielectric-metallic nanophotonics for the study of the strong light-matter interaction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04979 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Byrnes, N

    T. Byrnes, N. Y. Kim, and Y. Yamamoto, Exciton–polariton co ndensates, Nature Physics 10, 803 (2014)

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    Lerario, A

    G. Lerario, A. Fieramosca, F. Barachati, D. Ballarini, K. S. Dask alakis, L. Dominici, M. De Giorgi, S. A. Maier, G. Gigli, S. Kena-Cohen, and D. Sanvitto, Room-temperature superfluidity in a polariton condensate, Nature Physics 13, 837 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Christopoulos, G

    S. Christopoulos, G. B. H. von Hogersthal, A. J. D. Grundy, P. G . Lagoudakis, A. V. Kavokin, J. J. Baumberg, G. Christ- mann, R. Butte, E. Feltin, J. F. Carlin, and N. Grandjean, Room-t emperature polariton lasing in semiconductor micro- cavities, Physical Review Letters 98, ARTN 126405 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.126405 (2007)

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.126405 2007

  4. [4]

    Ballarini, M

    D. Ballarini, M. De Giorgi, E. Cancellieri, R. Houdr´ e, E. Giac obino, R. Cingolani, A. Bramati, G. Gigli, and D. Sanvitto, All-optical polariton transistor, Nature Communications 4, 1778 (2013)

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Dreismann, H

    A. Dreismann, H. Ohadi, Y. del Valle-Inclan Redondo, R. Bal ili, Y. G. Rubo, S. I. Tsintzos, G. Deligeorgis, Z. Hat- zopoulos, P. G. Savvidis, and J. J. Baumberg, A sub-femtojoule e lectrical spin-switch based on optically trapped polariton condensates, Nature Materials 15, 1074 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    P. G. Savvidis, J. J. Baumberg, R. M. Stevenson, M. S. Skoln ick, D. M. Whittaker, and J. S. Roberts, Angle-resonant stimulated polariton amplifier, Physical Review Letters 84, 1547 (2000)

    work page 2000

  7. [7]

    Chikkaraddy, B

    R. Chikkaraddy, B. de Nijs, F. Benz, S. J. Barrow, O. A. Scherman , E. Rosta, A. Demetriadou, P. Fox, O. Hess, and J. J. Baumberg, Single-molecule strong coupling at room temperature i n plasmonic nanocavities, Nature 535, 127 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    picocavities

    F. Benz, M. K. Schmidt, A. Dreismann, R. Chikkaraddy, Y. Zhan g, A. Demetriadou, C. Carnegie, H. Ohadi, B. De Nijs, R. Esteban, J. Aizpurua, and J. J. Baumberg, Single-molecule o ptomechanics in “picocavities”, Science 354, 726 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    M. E. Kleemann, R. Chikkaraddy, E. M. Alexeev, D. Kos, C. Carn egie, W. Deacon, A. C. de Pury, C. Grosse, B. de Nijs, J. Mertens, A. I. Tartakovskii, and J. J. Baumberg, Strong-coupl ing of wse(2) in ultra-compact plasmonic nanocavities at room temperature, Nat Commun 8, 1296 (2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    Baffou and R

    G. Baffou and R. Quidant, Thermo-plasmonics: using metal lic nanostructures as nano-sources of heat, Laser and Photonic s Reviews 7, 171 (2013)

    2013

  3. [11]

    Mie, Beitr¨ age zur optik tr¨ uber medien, speziell kolloidaler metall¨ osungen, Annalen der physik 330, 377 (1908)

    G. Mie, Beitr¨ age zur optik tr¨ uber medien, speziell kolloidaler metall¨ osungen, Annalen der physik 330, 377 (1908)

    1908

  4. [12]

    Caldarola, P

    M. Caldarola, P. Albella, E. Cort´ es, M. Rahmani, T. Rosch uk, G. Grinblat, R. F. Oulton, A. V. Bragas, and S. A. Maier, Non-plasmonic nanoantennas for surface enhanced spectroscopi es with ultra-low heat conversion, Nature Communications 6, 7915 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    A. I. Kuznetsov, A. E. Miroshnichenko, M. L. Brongersma, Y. S. Kivshar, and B. Luk’yanchuk, Optically resonant dielectric nanostructures, Science 354, aag2472 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    Cambiasso, G

    J. Cambiasso, G. Grinblat, Y. Li, A. Rakovich, E. Cortes, a nd S. A. Maier, Bridging the gap between dielectric nanopho- tonics and the visible regime with effectively lossless galli um phosphide antennas, Nano Letters 17, 1219 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    Verre, D

    R. Verre, D. G. Baranov, B. Munkhbat, J. Cuadra, M. K¨ all, and T . Shegai, Transition metal dichalcogenide nanodisks as high-index dielectric mie nanoresonators, Nature Nanotechnol ogy 14, 679–683 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    T. D. Green, D. G. Baranov, B. Munkhbat, R. Verre, T. Shegai, and M. K¨ all, Optical material anisotropy in high-index transition metal dichalcogenide mie nanoresonators, Optica 7, 680–686 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Busschaert, R

    S. Busschaert, R. Reimann, M. Cavigelli, R. Khelifa, A. Ja in, and L. Novotny, Transition metal dichalcogenide resonato rs for second harmonic signal enhancement, ACS Photonics 7, 2482 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    G. A. Ermolaev, D. V. Grudinin, Y. V. Stebunov, K. V. Voronin, V. G. Kravets, J. Duan, A. B. Mazitov, G. I. Tselikov, A. Bylinkin, D. I. Yakubovsky, S. M. Novikov, D. G. Baranov, A. Y. Nikitin, I. A. Kruglov, T. Shegai, P. Alonso- 18 Gonzalez, A. N. Grigorenko, A. V. Arsenin, ...

    2021

  11. [19]

    Nauman, J

    M. Nauman, J. Yan, D. de Ceglia, M. Rahmani, K. Zangeneh K amali, C. De Angelis, A. E. Miroshnichenko, Y. Lu, and D. N. Neshev, Tunable unidirectional nonlinear emission fro m transition-metal-dichalcogenide metasurfaces, Nature Communications 12, 5597 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    Munkhbat, B

    B. Munkhbat, B. K¨ u¸ c¨ uk¨ oz, D. G. Baranov, T. J. Antosiewicz, and T. O. Shegai, Nanostructured transition metal dichalc o- genide multilayers for advanced nanophotonics, Laser Photon ics Reviews 17, 2200057 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Munkhbat, P

    B. Munkhbat, P. Wr´ obel, T. J. Antosiewicz, and T. O. Sheg ai, Optical constants of several multilayer transition metal dichalcogenides measured by spectroscopic ellipsometry in th e 300–1700 nm range: High index, anisotropy, and hyperbol- icity, ACS Photonics 9, doi: 10.1021...

    2022 doi

  14. [22]

    P. G. Zotev, Y. Wang, L. Sortino, T. Severs Millard, N. Mulli n, D. Conteduca, M. Shagar, A. Genco, J. K. Hobbs, T. F. Krauss, and A. I. Tartakovskii, Transition metal dichalcogeni de dimer nanoantennas for tailored light-matter interactions , ACS Nano , doi.org/10.1021/acsnan...

    2022 doi

  15. [23]

    A. A. Popkova, I. M. Antropov, G. I. Tselikov, G. A. Ermolae v, I. Ozerov, R. V. Kirtaev, S. M. Novikov, A. B. Evlyukhin, A. V. Arsenin, V. O. Bessonov, V. S. Volkov, and A. A. Fedyanin, Nonlinear exciton-mie coupling in transition metal dichalcogenide nanoresonators, Laser Ph...

    2022

  16. [24]

    P. G. Zotev, Y. Wang, D. Andres-Penares, T. Severs-Millard, S . Randerson, X. Hu, L. Sortino, C. Louca, M. Brotons- Gisbert, T. Huq, et al. , Van der waals materials for applications in nanophotonics, L aser & Photonics Reviews , 2200957 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    A. K. Geim and I. V. Grigorieva, Van der waals heterostructure s, Nature 499, 419 (2013)

    2013

  18. [26]

    Frisenda, E

    R. Frisenda, E. Navarro-Moratalla, P. Gant, D. P´ erez De Lara, P. Jarillo-Herrero, R. V. Gorbachev, and A. Castellanos- Gomez, Recent progress in the assembly of nanodevices and van d er waals heterostructures by deterministic placement of 2d materials, Chemical Society Revie...

    2018

  19. [27]

    G. W. Castellanos, S. Murai, T. V. Raziman, S. Wang, M. Ram ezani, A. G. Curto, and J. G´ omez Rivas, Exciton-polaritons with magnetic and electric character in all-dielectric metasu rfaces, ACS Photonics 7, 1226 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    S. Wang, T. V. Raziman, S. Murai, G. W. Castellanos, P. Bai , A. M. Berghuis, R. H. Godiksen, A. G. Curto, and J. G´ omez Rivas, Collective mie exciton-polaritons in an atomically thin semiconductor, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 124, 19196 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    M. Qin, S. Xiao, W. Liu, M. Ouyang, T. Yu, T. Wang, and Q. Li ao, Strong coupling between excitons and magnetic dipole quasi-bound states in the continuum in ws2-tio2 hybrid metas urfaces, Optics Express 29, 18026 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    X. Zong, L. Li, and Y. Liu, Photonic bound states in the co ntinuum in nanostructured transition metal dichalcogenides for strong photon-exciton coupling, Opt Lett 46, 6095 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Kumar, J

    P. Kumar, J. Lynch, B. Song, H. Ling, F. Barrera, K. Kisslinge r, H. Zhang, S. B. Anantharaman, J. Digani, H. Zhu, T. H. Choudhury, C. McAleese, X. Wang, B. R. Conran, O. Whear, M. J. Mot ala, M. Snure, C. Muratore, J. M. Redwing, N. R. Glavin, E. A. Stach, A. R. Davoyan, and ...

    2022

  24. [32]

    Weber, L

    T. Weber, L. K¨ uhner, L. Sortino, A. Ben Mhenni, N. P. Wilson , J. K¨ uhne, J. J. Finley, S. A. Maier, and A. Tittl, Intrinsic strong light-matter coupling with self-hybridized bound stat es in the continuum in van der waals metasurfaces, Nature Materials 22, 970–976 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    Cho, D.-J

    H. Cho, D.-J. Shin, J. Sung, and S.-H. Gong, Ultra-thin grat ing coupler for guided exciton-polaritons in ws2 multilayers, Nanophotonics 12, 2563 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    S. W. Lee, J. S. Lee, W. H. Choi, and S. H. Gong, Ultrathin WS 2 Polariton Waveguide for Efficient Light Guiding, Advanced Optical Materials 2300069, 1 (2023). 19

    2023

  27. [35]

    Bouteyre, X

    P. Bouteyre, X. Hu, S. Randerson, P. Zotev, Y. Wang, , and A. I. Tartakovskii, Simultaneous observation of bright and dark polariton states in subwavelength gratings made from quasi- bulk ws 2, Optics Express 33, 21173 (2025)

    2025

  28. [36]

    Lepeshov, M

    S. Lepeshov, M. Wang, A. Krasnok, O. Kotov, T. Zhang, H. Li u, T. Jiang, B. Korgel, M. Terrones, Y. Zheng, and A. Alu, Tunable resonance coupling in single si nanoparticle-monola yer ws2 structures, ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10, 16690 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    Tserkezis, P

    C. Tserkezis, P. A. D. Gon¸ calves, C. Wolff, F. Todisco, K. B usch, and N. A. Mortensen, Mie excitons: Understanding strong coupling in dielectric nanoparticles, Physical Review B 98, 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.155439 (2018)

    2018 doi

  30. [38]

    S. A. Randerson, P. G. Zotev, X. Hu, A. Knight, Y. Wang, S. N agarkar, D. Hensman, Y. Wang, and A. I. Tartakovskii, Van der Waals Nanoantennas on Gold as Hosts for Hybrid Mie-Plas monic Resonances, ACS Nano 18, 16208 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Munkhbat, A

    B. Munkhbat, A. B. Yankovich, D. G. Baranov, R. Verre, E. Olss on, and T. O. Shegai, Transition metal dichalcogenide nanodisks as high-index dielectric mie nanoresonators, Nature Communications 11, 4604 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    E. M. Alexeev, A. Catanzaro, O. V. Skrypka, P. K. Nayak, S. A hn, S. Pak, J. Lee, J. I. Sohn, K. S. Novoselov, H. S. Shin, et al. , Imaging of interlayer coupling in van der waals heterostructu res using a bright-field optical microscope, Nano letters 17, 5342 (2017)

    2017

  33. [41]

    K. Hasz, Z. Hu, K.-D. Park, and M. B. Raschke, Tip-enhanced dark exciton nanoimaging and local strain control in monolayer wse2, Nano Letters 23, 198 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    Lepeshov, M

    S. Lepeshov, M. Wang, A. Krasnok, O. Kotov, T. Zhang, H. Li u, T. Jiang, B. Korgel, M. Terrones, Y. Zheng, et al. , Tunable resonance coupling in single si nanoparticle–monola yer ws2 structures, ACS applied materials & interfaces 10, 16690 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    Tserkezis, P

    C. Tserkezis, P. Gon¸ calves, C. Wolff, F. Todisco, K. Busc h, and N. A. Mortensen, Mie excitons: Understanding strong coupling in dielectric nanoparticles, Physical Review B 98, 155439 (2018)

    2018

  36. [44]

    H. Wang, J. Wen, W. Wang, N. Xu, P. Liu, J. Yan, H. Chen, and S. Deng, Resonance coupling in heterostructures composed of silicon nanosphere and monolayer ws2: a magnetic-dipole- mediated energy transfer process, ACS nano 13, 1739 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    H. Gu, B. Song, M. Fang, Y. Hong, X. Chen, H. Jiang, W. Ren, and S. Liu, Layer-dependent dielectric and optical properties of centimeter-scale 2d wse(2): evolution from a singl e layer to few layers, Nanoscale 11, 22762 (2019)

    2019

  38. [46]

    E. D. Palik, Handbook of optical constants of solids , Vol. 3 (Academic press, 1998). Supplementary information for Exciton-polaritons in a monolayer semiconductor coupled to van der Waals dielectric nanoantennas on a metallic mirror Yadong Wang,1, ∗ Charalambos Louca, 1 Sam R...

    1998

  39. [47]

    A. V. Kavokin, J. J. Baumberg, G. Malpuech, and F. P. Laussy , Microcavities (Oxford University Press, 2017)

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.