Collective excitation spectra of dipolar bosonic fractional quantum Hall states

Moumita Indra; Pankaj Kumar Mishra

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 80 references

Collective excitation spectra of dipolar bosonic fractional quantum Hall states

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Composite-fermion exciton spectra for a dipolar bosonic quantum Hall gas show spin-conserving roton minima at $\nu = 1/2, 1/4, 1/6$, a double roton at $\nu = 1/6$, and a fundamental-mode spectral weight that grows and peaks at lower…

desk verdict Credible CF-exciton spectra for dipolar FQH states, but the ν=1/6 Raman prediction rests on a radial-dipole model that conflicts with the experimental geometry and the abstract overclaims double rotons. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.05085 v1 pith:VWHIQA7B submitted 2025-06-05 cond-mat.quant-gas

Moumita Indra , Pankaj Kumar Mishra This is my paper

classification cond-mat.quant-gas MSC 81V7082D50 PACS 03.75.Hh67.85.-d73.43.-f

keywords dipolarBosegasfractionalquantumHallstatescompositefermionscollectiveexcitationsrotonminimumspectralweightrapidlyrotatingtrapHaldanepseudopotentials

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish how long-range dipole-dipole interactions change the collective excitation spectra of rotating ultra-cold dipolar Bose gases in the fractional quantum Hall regime. Using composite-fermion exciton wave functions on a sphere, the authors compute spin-conserving and spin-reversed spectra at the Jain-series fillings $\nu = 1/2$, $1/4$, and $1/6$. They report that the roton minima familiar from short-range interactions survive for dipolar interactions, with a double roton minimum appearing in the spin-conserving fundamental mode at $\nu = 1/6$. The gap between the lowest and next excitation mode grows as the filling fraction increases, and the spectral weight of the fundamental mode grows and peaks at lower momentum as filling decreases. On that basis they argue that $\nu = 1/6$ is the most promising filling for detecting these modes in inelastic Raman scattering experiments.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the composite-fermion exciton wave function on the sphere: a particle-hole pair formed by promoting one composite fermion from the filled lowest $\Lambda$-level to an empty higher $\Lambda$-level (spin-conserving, $0\uparrow\to 1\uparrow, 2\uparrow, 3\uparrow$) or to the opposite-spin $\Lambda$-level (spin-reversed, $0\uparrow\to 0\downarrow, 1\downarrow, 2\downarrow$), projected to the lowest Landau level with a Jastrow factor. The interaction is the dipole-dipole potential of Eq. (5) with all dipoles radially aligned on the sphere, expanded into Haldane pseudopotentials $V_m$, which drop to zero beyond $m \approx 10$. Low-energy modes at fixed angular momentum $L$ are obtained by Gram-Schmidt orthogonalizing the exciton states and diagonalizing the interaction Hamiltonian, and the visibility of the fundamental mode is quantified by the spectral weight $S_L$.

What would settle it

Compare the composite-fermion exciton spectra against exact diagonalization of the dipolar Haldane pseudopotentials $V_m$ from Eq. (5) for the same fillings on small spheres (e.g., $N = 6$-$12$); if the exact ground-state overlap is low or the exact collective spectrum has no double roton minimum at $\nu = 1/6$, the central claim is falsified. A complementary check is to recompute $V_m$ with dipoles aligned perpendicular to the plane, as in a real trap, and see whether the roton minima and the spectral-weight peak shifts survive.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for a rapidly rotating, fully polarized dipolar Bose gas, the collective mode structure at the bosonic Jain fillings $\nu = 1/2$, $1/4$, and $1/6$ is qualitatively preserved from the short-range-interaction case and carries additional, filling-dependent signatures. Computed from composite-fermion exciton wave functions with a dipole-dipole interaction whose pseudopotentials vanish beyond relative angular momentum $m \approx 10$, the spin-conserving fundamental mode shows roton minima at all three fillings, and at $\nu = 1/6$ it develops a double roton minimum, while spin-reversed modes show positive spin-wave-like dispersion at low momenta. The energy gap between the fundamental mode and the next higher exciton mode increases with increasing filling fraction, and the spectral weight of the fundamental mode, $S_L = (1/N)|\langle \chi_L|\rho_L|\Psi_0\rangle|^2$, increases and its maximum shifts toward lower momenta as the filling fraction decreases. The authors conclude that at $\nu = 1/6$ the fundamental mode is strongest and best separated, making it the most favorable case for detection by inelastic Raman scattering.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the choice that every dipole points radially outward on the sphere, which keeps the interaction rotationally invariant but does not match a real rotating trap, where an external field would generally align the dipoles perpendicular to the plane; if the spectra are sensitive to that orientation, the computed roton minima and spectral weights would not describe the experimental system, and the companion claim that the spectra are independent of particle number is made without showing finite-size data.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the spectra are right, the roton-minimum physics established for short-range bosons survives long-range dipolar interactions, so dipolar rotating gases are a viable platform for studying fractional quantum Hall collective modes.
The double roton minimum in the spin-conserving fundamental mode at $\nu = 1/6$ is a specific signature that distinguishes this filling from $\nu = 1/2$ and $1/4$ in a dipolar gas.
The mode gap increasing with filling fraction means $\nu = 1/2$ has the most separated fundamental mode, while lower fillings have softer, closer modes; this ordering is directly testable in future experiments.
The spectral-weight peak shifting to lower momenta as filling decreases, together with the larger weight at $\nu = 1/6$, identifies inelastic Raman scattering at small momentum transfer as the preferred probe.
The spin-conserving modes carry higher spectral weight than spin-reversed modes at all three fillings, so spin-conserving excitations should be the easier ones to observe.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The radial-dipole assumption used to preserve rotational invariance on the sphere likely differs from a real trap, where an external field would align dipoles perpendicular to the plane; if the pseudopotentials change significantly under that more realistic orientation, the roton positions and the spectral-weight ordering could shift, a check the paper does not perform.
The double roton at $\nu = 1/6$ could be read as a precursor of an instability or of a nearby competing phase; a natural extension is to scan intermediate fillings or add a small contact interaction to see how the two minima merge.
The spectral-weight peak position as a function of filling could serve as a practical filling-fraction diagnostic in rotating BEC experiments, independent of the microscopic model details.
The same composite-fermion exciton machinery should apply to fermionic dipolar fractional quantum Hall states; the prediction would be that the mode gap and spectral-weight peak shift follow the same trend with filling.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The genuinely new thing here is a numerical extension of the composite-fermion exciton program to the dipole-dipole interaction at ν = 1/2, 1/4, 1/6: excitation spectra for spin-conserving and spin-reversed modes, plus spectral weights, all from Monte Carlo evaluation of the interaction in the CF basis. The spectral-weight analysis and the suggestion that ν = 1/6 would give the strongest inelastic Raman response are concrete, testable claims. That is worth a serious referee's time, and the body-level computation is plausible within its stated model.

The soft spots are real but mostly correctable. First, the abstract says double rotons appear for all three fractions, but the figures show two minima clearly only for ν = 1/6; ν = 1/4 has a single roton and ν = 1/2 is essentially flat. That overreach should be fixed. Second, the abstract says the spectral-weight peak shifts toward lower momenta for both spin-conserving and spin-reversed excitations, while the body says the spin-reversed peak barely moves. Another internal mismatch. Third, the Monte Carlo energies have no error bars, which matters because the ν = 1/6 gaps are around 0.01 Cd. Fourth, the claim that the spectra are N-independent is asserted without showing finite-size data.

The load-bearing problem is the dipole-orientation model. Eq. 5 takes every dipole pointing radially outward on the sphere, which preserves rotational symmetry but is not what a real rotating trap does: there an external field aligns dipoles perpendicular to the plane, and on the sphere that breaks SO(3). The paper's own Conclusions assume the perpendicular geometry. All pseudopotentials and spectra come from Eq. 5, so the predicted double-roton structure and the ν = 1/6 Raman visibility cannot yet be transferred to the experimental system. No exact diagonalization or independent check validates the CF wave functions for these dipolar pseudopotentials. This is the biggest gap, and it is not a minor fix: the prediction needs either a justification that the two geometries give the same low-lying physics, or a recalculation with perpendicular dipoles.

Overall: the paper is a reasonable working step, and the ν = 1/6 double-roton prediction is interesting enough to warrant peer review. But it needs major revision before publication: correct the abstract, add error bars and finite-size data, and either address the dipole-orientation mismatch or soften the experimental claim to match the model actually used.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies collective excitations of rapidly rotating dipolar Bose gases in the fractional quantum Hall regime at filling fractions ν = 1/2, 1/4, and 1/6. Using composite-fermion (CF) exciton wave functions on the sphere and Metropolis Monte Carlo evaluation of the interaction matrix elements, the authors compute spin-conserving and spin-reversed excitation spectra and spectral weights. The central claims are: the presence of roton minima (with a double-roton structure at ν = 1/6), an increasing gap between the fundamental and next-higher mode as the filling fraction increases, and a spectral-weight maximum that shifts to lower momenta as the filling fraction decreases, leading to the proposal that ν = 1/6 is the most promising case for detection via inelastic Raman scattering. The computation is presented as an extension of earlier CF-exciton studies from short-range and Coulomb interactions to the long-range dipole-dipole interaction.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a useful extension of CF-exciton theory to dipolar bosonic FQH states and it makes a concrete, falsifiable prediction for Raman-scattering experiments. The work is not parameter-fit: the excitation energies are obtained by evaluating the physical interaction Hamiltonian in the CF-exciton basis, and the comparison of spectral weights across filling fractions is a meaningful observable. The main value lies in showing that roton phenomenology survives for a long-range 1/r^3 interaction while the lowest mode becomes more visible at smaller filling. However, the significance is currently limited by the radial-dipole modeling assumption, the lack of validation of the CF ansatz for these pseudopotentials, and the absence of error bars and finite-size evidence for the reported numbers.

major comments (5)

[II (Eq. 5) and VI] The interaction used for all numerical results is the radial-dipole potential of Eq. (5), in which each dipole is aligned along the local sphere normal. The Conclusions (Sec. VI) instead state that the dipole moment is oriented perpendicular to the trapping potential. These two geometries are physically different: a real rotating trap with a fixed external-field axis produces a globally oriented dipole configuration that breaks the SO(3) symmetry used to define total angular momentum L, and it yields different two-body matrix elements from those in Fig. 2(b). Since the spectra in Figs. 3-5 and the spectral weights in Fig. 5 all derive from Eq. (5), the Raman-detection claim for ν = 1/6 cannot be transferred to the experimental geometry described in the Conclusions without further derivation. The authors must either repeat the calculation for globally oriented dipoles (with appropriate angular averaging or LLL projection) or explicitly restrict all conclusions to the radial-dipole model and substantially soften the experimental claim.
[Abstract and IV (Fig. 3)] The abstract states that the fundamental and next-higher modes for each of the three filling fractions show a double roton in the spin-conserving configuration. The results reported in Sec. IV and Fig. 3 do not support this phrasing: a double roton (two minima at k l_B ≈ 1.0 and 2.0) is described only for ν = 1/6, while ν = 1/2 shows a monotonic decrease to a plateau and ν = 1/4 has a single roton minimum at k l_B ≈ 1.3. The double-roton claim should be restricted to ν = 1/6, and the related statements about mode gaps should be made quantitative for each fraction.
[III (Simulation details)] The Monte Carlo energies are reported without statistical error bars, and the statement that "the energy spectra does not depend on the number of particles" (Sec. III) is not supported by any displayed finite-size data, despite the text saying that N = 75, 95, 125 were used and a "best fit" was chosen. Because the excitation energies in Eq. (11) are differences of Monte Carlo estimates, the roton positions and the mode gaps need either error bars or an explicit finite-size analysis before they can be used to compare filling fractions or to support the thermodynamic-limit claim.
[III B and C (Eq. 11)] The exciton basis is truncated to three states per spin sector and then Gram-Schmidt orthogonalized, but no convergence test is reported showing that additional exciton states (e.g., higher Λ-levels or multi-pair excitations) do not modify the lowest modes. For a long-range 1/r^3 interaction with non-negligible pseudopotentials out to m ≈ 10 (Fig. 2(b)), mixing with states beyond the three retained excitons could affect roton depths and spectral weights; a convergence check is needed to support the quantitative claims.
[III A and Fig. 2] No independent validation is provided for the CF ground-state and exciton wave functions against the dipolar pseudopotentials of Fig. 2(b). The CF ansatz is well established for contact and Coulomb interactions, but the 1/r^3 interaction has a very different pseudopotential structure, and the ground state or low-lying excitations could in principle be sensitive to that difference. Exact diagonalization for small N (or another independent method) would establish whether the roton minima and spectral-weight maxima are properties of the physical system or artifacts of the ansatz.

minor comments (5)

[II (Eqs. 1 and 3)] The symbol p is used both for the single-particle momentum in Eq. (1) and for the dipole-moment vector in Eqs. (2)-(5); renaming the dipole moment, for example d_i, would remove a genuine ambiguity.
[Fig. 2(b)] The pseudopotential plot begins at m = 2 and omits m = 0. For a 1/r^3 interaction the m = 0 pseudopotential is expected to be dominant or singular, and normalizing by V_1 hides this. The authors should state explicitly how V_0 is treated or regularized.
[Title and Abstract] The title contains a typo ("fraction al") and the abstract uses "spin-reversing" where "spin-reversed" is meant; these should be corrected.
[V (Eq. 12)] The spectral weight definition in Eq. (12) uses ρ_L with monopole harmonics Y_{L,0}, but the normalization of Y_{L,0} and the treatment of the L = 0 term are not specified. In addition, Fig. 5 has no error bars, which is particularly important given the claim that ν = 1/6 has the highest spectral weight.
[References] Several references are incomplete or truncated (e.g., Refs. [19], [67], and [77] lack full page or journal information); the reference list should be checked against the published sources.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the reported spectra and spectral weights are computed outputs of Hamiltonian matrix elements in a composite-fermion exciton basis, with no fitted parameters; self-citations provide methodological scaffolding but do not force the numerical claims.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained in the sense that the reported spectra and spectral weights are outputs of a numerical evaluation, not inputs. Equation (11) defines each excitation energy as a difference of diagonal matrix elements of the interaction Hamiltonian (Eq. 5) in Gram-Schmidt-orthonormalized CF exciton states, and Eq. (12) defines the spectral weight as a density-operator matrix element; Monte Carlo evaluation of these expressions with no fitted parameters produces the curves in Figs. 3-5. The composite-fermion exciton wavefunctions (Eqs. 6, 9, 10) follow the standard Jain/Majumder-Mandal-Jain construction (Refs. 34, 63, 73, 76); self-citations [55-57] supply the three-exciton basis and previous roton phenomenology for comparison, but the dipolar spectrum is freshly computed. The only load-bearing premise that is an input rather than a derived result is the radial-dipole model of Eq. 5, and the later statement that dipoles are oriented 'perpendicular to the trapping potential' is inconsistent with that model; this is a model-relevance/correctness concern, not a circular reduction of a prediction to its inputs. No equation is equivalent to another by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Score 2 rather than 0 only because the methodological scaffolding is taken from the authors' prior exciton papers; that scaffolding does not force the numerical claims.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The computation is a forward evaluation of the interaction Hamiltonian in a composite fermion exciton basis; no constants are fitted to external data. The load-bearing inputs are the critical-rotation limit, the radial dipole-orientation model, the CF ground-state ansatz, and a hand-chosen three-state exciton truncation. The only hand-selected numerical element is the undocumented finite-size 'best fit' over N = 75, 95, 125. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)

finite-size 'best fit' extrapolation = not specified
Sec. III reports N = 75, 95, 125 and takes 'the best fit' as representative, but no extrapolation form, uncertainty, or N-dependence figure is provided.
exciton basis truncation = 3 states per spin sector
Only the three lowest Λ-level transitions per spin sector enter the Gram-Schmidt procedure before the spectrum in Sec. IV is computed; this hand-chosen truncation bounds the modes the calculation can find.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The composite fermion wave functions with Jastrow factor and LLL projection are the correct ground and exciton states for the dipolar system.
Invoked in Sec. III, Eqs. (6), (9), (10); not validated against exact diagonalization for the dipolar pseudopotentials.
domain assumption The kinetic energy term is constant in the critical-rotation limit and is omitted from the Hamiltonian.
Sec. II after Eq. (1): 'we assume ω = Ω which makes the Hamiltonian similar to that of the FQHE in the 2D fermionic system.'
domain assumption All dipoles are aligned radially outward on the sphere, making the interaction rotationally invariant.
Sec. II, Eq. (5): 'We assume that all the dipoles get aligned along the perpendicular radial direction of the sphere.'
domain assumption The contact interaction is negligible relative to the dipole-dipole interaction.
Sec. VI: 'small scattering lengths where DDI becomes more important than the contact interaction.'
ad hoc to paper The exciton basis is truncated to three lowest states per spin sector, then Gram-Schmidt orthogonalized.
Sec. IV: 'as these states are not orthogonal to each other we perform the Gram-Schmidt orthonormalization procedure'; the truncation to 0→1, 0→2, 0→3 (spin-conserving) and 0→0, 0→1, 0→2 (spin-reversed) is chosen by hand.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Collective excitation spectra of dipolar bosonic fractional quantum Hall states." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VWHIQA7B

@misc{pith2026250605085,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Collective excitation spectra of dipolar bosonic fractional quantum Hall states},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VWHIQA7B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.05085}
}

abstract

We numerically investigate the collective excitation of spin-conserving and spin-reversed configuration of rotating diluted ultra-cold dipolar Bose gas. Rotating trapped Bose gas produces a fictitious magnetic field perpendicular to the trapping harmonic potential, which exhibits strongly correlated fractional quantum Hall states. We consider the long-range dipole-dipole interaction and compute the low lying excitations spectrum for the three fractions of the first Jain series $\nu = 1/2, 1/4, 1/6$. We find that for both the spin-conserving and spin-reversed excitation the gap between the fundamental mode and the higher excitation mode increases upon increase in the filling fraction. The fundamental modes and the next higher-energy mode of excitation spectra for each of the three fractions show the presence of double roton for spin-conserving configuration only. Finally we complement our observation by calculating the spectral weight for the fundamental mode of excitation spectra which show the momenta at which the spectral weight exhibits the maxima shifts towards the lower momenta for both the excitations. Our observation for the spectral weight could be related with the inelastic Raman scattering which may be useful for the future experimental study to detect the excitation in ultracold system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.05085 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Ground state energy ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** FIG. 4. Spin-reversed excitation spectra for the fully pola [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Spectral weight ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

[1]

The bra-ket notation denotes the multidimensional integrations here, which are numerically computed by the Monte Carlo method

will be the interac- tion potential ( V ) only as described earlier. The bra-ket notation denotes the multidimensional integrations here, which are numerically computed by the Monte Carlo method. We have considered three diﬀerent ﬁlling frac- tions ν = 1 /2, 1/4, 1/6 to compute the energy spectra (∆) for both the spin-conserving and spin-reversed ex- cita...

work page
[2]

M. H. Anderson, J. R. Ensher, M. R. Matthews, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, Observation of bose-einstein condensation in a dilute atomic vapor, science 269, 198 (1995)

work page 1995
[3]

Y. Tang, W. Kao, K.-Y. Li, and B. L. Lev, Tuning the dipole-dipole interaction in a quantum gas with a rotating magnetic ﬁeld, Physical review letters 120, 230401 (2018)

work page 2018
[4]

K. B. Davis, M.-O. Mewes, M. R. Andrews, N. J. van Druten, D. S. Durfee, D. Kurn, and W. Ketterle, Bose-einstein condensation in a gas of sodium atoms, Physical review letters 75, 3969 (1995)

work page 1995
[5]

M. Lu, N. Q. Burdick, S. H. Youn, and B. L. Lev, Strongly dipolar bose-einstein condensate of dysprosium, Physical review letters 107, 190401 (2011)

work page 2011
[6]

Trautmann, P

A. Trautmann, P. Ilzhöfer, G. Durastante, C. Politi, M. Sohmen, M. Mark, and F. Ferlaino, Dipolar quantum mixtures of erbium and dysprosium atoms, Physical Review Letters 121, 213601 (2018)

work page 2018
[7]

The composite Fermion transformation maintains the overall wave-function symmetry of the system as Φ and J both are antisymmetric in nature

we have used the spherical Spinor variables ( u, v) which are given by u = cos(θ/2)e−iφ/2 and v = sin(θ/2)eiφ/2 (8) where, θ and φ vary between 0 to π and 0 to 2π, respectively. The composite Fermion transformation maintains the overall wave-function symmetry of the system as Φ and J both are antisymmetric in nature. B. Wave-function for spin-conserving e...

work page
[8]

Regnault and T

N. Regnault and T. Jolicoeur, Quantum hall fractions in rotating bose-einstein condensates, Physical review letters 91, 030402 (2003)

work page 2003

Show all 80 references

[9]

Rogel-Salazar, The gross–pitaevskii equation and bose–einstein condensates, European Journal of Physics 34, 247 (2013)

J. Rogel-Salazar, The gross–pitaevskii equation and bose–einstein condensates, European Journal of Physics 34, 247 (2013)

2013
[10]

Yamamoto and Y

Y. Yamamoto and Y. Takahashi, Bose-einstein condensa- tion: A platform for quantum simulation experiments, in Principles and Methods of Quantum Information Technologie s (Springer, 2016) pp. 265–307

2016
[11]

The Hamil- tonian of the system in equation (

and the ground state energy by the latter one. The Hamil- tonian of the system in equation (
[12]

E. H. Lieb and W. Liniger, Exact analysis of an interact- ing bose gas. i. the general solution and the ground state, Physical Review 130, 1605 (1963)

1963
[13]

Griesmaier, J

A. Griesmaier, J. Werner, S. Hensler, J. Stuhler, and T. Pfau, Bose-einstein condensation of chromium, Physical Review Letters 94, 160401 (2005)

2005
[14]

Stuhler, A

J. Stuhler, A. Griesmaier, T. Koch, M. Fattori, T. Pfau, S. Giovanazzi, P. Pedri, and L. Santos, Observation of dipole-dipole interaction in a degenerate quantum gas, Physical Review Letters 95, 150406 (2005)

2005
[15]

Lahaye, T

T. Lahaye, T. Koch, B. Fröhlich, M. Fattori, J. Metz, A. Griesmaier, S. Giovanazzi, and T. Pfau, Strong dipolar eﬀects in a quantum ferroﬂuid, Nature 448, 672 (2007)

2007
[16]

A. J. Olson, D. L. Whitenack, and Y. P. Chen, Eﬀects of magnetic dipole-dipole interactions in atomic bose- einstein condensates with tunable s-wave interactions, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 88, 043609 (2013)

2013
[17]

Xi and H

K.-T. Xi and H. Saito, Droplet formation in a bose- einstein condensate with strong dipole-dipole interactio n, Physical Review A 93, 011604 (2016)

2016
[18]

Bismut, B

G. Bismut, B. Pasquiou, E. Maréchal, P. Pedri, L. Vernac, O. Gorceix, and B. Laburthe-Tolra, Collec- tive excitations of a dipolar bose-einstein condensate, Physical review letters 105, 040404 (2010)

2010
[19]

Lahaye, C

T. Lahaye, C. Menotti, L. Santos, M. Lewenstein, and T. Pfau, The physics of dipolar bosonic quantum gases, Reports on Progress in Physics 72, 126401 (2009)

2009
[20]

Chomaz, R

L. Chomaz, R. M. van Bijnen, D. Petter, G. Faraoni, S. Baier, J. H. Becher, M. J. Mark, F. Waechtler, L. Santos, and F. Ferlaino, Observation of ro- ton mode population in a dipolar quantum gas, Nature physics 14, 442 (2018)

2018
[21]

H. Lyu, Y. Zhang, and T. Busch, Detection of ro- ton and phonon excitations in a spin-orbit-coupled bose-einstein condensate with a moving barrier, Physical Review A 106, 013302 (2022)

2022
[22]

Hung, C.-L

H.-H. Hung, C.-L. Song, X. Chen, X. Ma, Q.- k. Xue, and C. Wu, Anisotropic vortex lat- tice structures in the fese superconductor, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 85, 104510
[23]

Greiter, Landau level quantization on the sphere, Physical Review B 83, 115129 (2011)

M. Greiter, Landau level quantization on the sphere, Physical Review B 83, 115129 (2011)

2011
[24]

Chang, N

C.-C. Chang, N. Regnault, T. Jolicoeur, and J. K. Jain, Composite fermionization of bosons in rapidly rotating atomic traps, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 72, 013611
[25]

D. C. Tsui, H. L. Stormer, and A. C. Gossard, Two- dimensional magnetotransport in the extreme quantum limit, Physical Review Letters 48, 1559 (1982)

1982
[26]

D. Tsui, H. Störmer, and A. Gossard, Zero-resistance state of two-dimensional electrons in a quantizing mag- netic ﬁeld, Physical Review B 25, 1405 (1982)

1982
[27]

Stormer, A

H. Stormer, A. Chang, D. Tsui, J. Hwang, A. Gossard, and W. Wiegmann, Fractional quantization of the hall eﬀect, Physical review letters 50, 1953 (1983)

1983
[28]

Prange and S

R. Prange and S. Girvin, The quantum hall eﬀect, New York 10.1007/978-1-4612-3350-3 (1990)

1990 doi
[29]

H. L. Stormer, Two-dimensional elec- tron correlation in high magnetic ﬁelds, Physica B: Condensed Matter 177, 401 (1992)

1992
[30]

Struck and B

A. Struck and B. Kramer, Electron correlations and single-particle physics in the integer quantum hall eﬀect, Physical review letters 97, 106801 (2006)

2006
[31]

R. B. Laughlin, Anomalous quantum hall eﬀect: an in- compressible quantum ﬂuid with fractionally charged ex- citations, Physical Review Letters 50, 1395 (1983)

1983
[32]

Shi, E.-M

Q. Shi, E.-M. Shih, M. V. Gustafsson, D. A. Rhodes, B. Kim, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Z. Papić, J. Hone, and C. R. Dean, Odd-and even-denominator fractional quantum hall states in monolayer wse2, Nature Nanotechnology 15, 569 (2020)

2020
[33]

Y. Chen, Y. Huang, Q. Li, B. Tong, G. Kuang, C. Xi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, G. Liu, Z. Zhu, et al. , Tunable even-and odd-denominator frac- tional quantum hall states in trilayer graphene, Nature Communications 15, 6236 (2024)

2024
[34]

D. E. Feldman and B. I. Halperin, Fractional charge and fractional statistics in the quantum hall eﬀects, Reports on Progress in Physics 84, 076501 (2021)

2021
[35]

Bruno, V

P. Bruno, V. Dugaev, and M. Taillefumier, Topo- logical hall eﬀect in magnetic nanostructures, 9 Phys. Rev. Lett 93, 58 (2012)

2012
[36]

Sprinkart, E

N. Sprinkart, E. Scheer, and A. Di Bernardo, Tutorial: From topology to hall ef- fects—implications of berry phase physics, Journal of Low Temperature Physics , 1 (2024)

2024
[37]

Jain, Theory of the fractional quantum hall eﬀect, Physical Review B 41, 7653 (1990)

J. Jain, Theory of the fractional quantum hall eﬀect, Physical Review B 41, 7653 (1990)

1990
[38]

Cooper and N

N. Cooper and N. Wilkin, Composite fermion de- scription of rotating bose-einstein condensates, Physical Review B 60, R16279 (1999)

1999
[39]

Leinaas and J

J. Leinaas and J. Myrheim, On the theory of identical particles, Il nuovo cimento 37, 132 (1977)

1977
[40]

Wilczek, Magnetic ﬂux, angular momentum, and statistics, Physical Review Letters 48, 1144 (1982)

F. Wilczek, Magnetic ﬂux, angular momentum, and statistics, Physical Review Letters 48, 1144 (1982)

1982
[41]

J. K. Jain, Composite-fermion approach for the fractional quantum hall eﬀect, Physical review letters 63, 199 (1989)

1989
[42]

Shankar and G

R. Shankar and G. Murthy, Towards a ﬁeld theory of fractional quantum hall states, Physical review letters 79, 4437 (1997)

1997
[43]

Lopez and E

A. Lopez and E. Fradkin, Fractional quan- tum hall eﬀect and chern-simons gauge theories, Physical Review B 44, 5246 (1991)

1991
[44]

Modak, S

S. Modak, S. S. Mandal, and K. Sen- gupta, Fermionic chern-simons theory of su (4) fractional quantum hall eﬀect, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 84, 165118 (2011)

2011
[45]

Miesner, D

H.-J. Miesner, D. Stamper-Kurn, J. Stenger, S. In- ouye, A. Chikkatur, and W. Ketterle, Observation of metastable states in spinor bose-einstein condensates, Physical Review Letters 82, 2228 (1999)

1999
[46]

Modugno, M

G. Modugno, M. Modugno, F. Riboli, G. Roati, and M. Inguscio, Two atomic species superﬂuid, Physical Review Letters 89, 190404 (2002)

2002
[47]

Thalhammer, G

G. Thalhammer, G. Barontini, L. De Sarlo, J. Catani, F. Minardi, and M. Inguscio, Double species bose- einstein condensate with tunable interspecies interac- tions, Physical review letters 100, 210402 (2008)

2008
[48]

S. Papp, J. Pino, and C. Wieman, Tunable mis- cibility in a dual-species bose-einstein condensate, Physical review letters 101, 040402 (2008)

2008
[49]

Kukushkin, K

I. Kukushkin, K. v. Klitzing, and K. Eberl, Spin polariz a- tion of composite fermions: Measurements of the fermi energy, Physical review letters 82, 3665 (1999)

1999
[50]

Indra, D

M. Indra, D. Das, and D. Majumder, Study of partially polarized fractional quantum hall states, Physics Letters A 382, 2984 (2018)

2018
[51]

A. C. Balram, C. Tőke, A. Wójs, and J. K. Jain, Phase diagram of fractional quantum hall ef- fect of composite fermions in multicomponent systems, Physical review B 91, 045109 (2015)

2015
[52]

J. R. Abo-Shaeer, C. Raman, J. M. Vogels, and W. Ket- terle, Observation of vortex lattices in bose-einstein con - densates, Science 292, 476 (2001)

2001
[53]

A. L. Fetter, Rotating trapped bose-einstein condensa tes, Reviews of Modern Physics 81, 647 (2009)

2009
[54]

Baranov, K

M. Baranov, K. Osterloh, and M. Lewenstein, Fractional quantum hall states in ultracold rapidly rotating dipolar fermi gases, Physical review letters 94, 070404 (2005)

2005
[55]

H. Pino, E. Alba, J. Taron, J. J. García- Ripoll, and N. Barberán, Hall response of in- teracting bosonic atoms in strong gauge ﬁelds: From condensed to fractional-quantum-hall states, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 87, 053611 (2013)

2013
[56]

Imran and M

M. Imran and M. Ahsan, Novel phases in rotating bose-condensed gas: vortices and quantum correlation, The European Physical Journal D 77, 79 (2023)

2023
[57]

D. Das, S. Sahu, and D. Majumder, Roton minimum at ν = 1/ 2 ﬁlled fractional quantum hall eﬀect of bose particles, Physica B: Condensed Matter 550, 96 (2018)

2018
[58]

Indra and D

M. Indra and D. Majumder, Collective spin density excitation of fractional quantum hall states in dilute ultra-cold bose atoms, Solid State Communications 306, 113796 (2020)

2020
[59]

Indra, D

M. Indra, D. Jain, and S. Mondal, Double roton- minima in bosonic fractional quantum hall states, Physica Scripta 98, 065948 (2023)

2023
[60]

Indra and S

M. Indra and S. Mondal, Collective ex- citation of bosonic quantum hall state, Journal of Low Temperature Physics 214, 294 (2024)

2024
[61]

composite bosons

N. Wilkin and J. Gunn, Condensation of “composite bosons” in a rotating bec, Physical review letters 84, 6 (2000)

2000
[62]

N. R. Cooper, N. K. Wilkin, and J. Gunn, Quantum phases of vortices in rotating bose-einstein condensates, Physical review letters 87, 120405 (2001)

2001
[63]

Chung and T

B. Chung and T. Jolicoeur, Fermions out of dipolar bosons in the lowest landau level, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 77, 043608
[64]

S. H. Simon, E. Rezayi, and N. R. Cooper, Pseudopotentials for multiparticle interactions in the quantum hall regime, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 75, 195306
[65]

S.-S. Gong, W. Zhu, and D. Sheng, Emergent chiral spin liquid: Fractional quantum hall eﬀect in a kagome heisen- berg model, Scientiﬁc reports 4, 6317 (2014)

2014
[66]

Majumder, S

D. Majumder, S. S. Mandal, and J. K. Jain, Collective excitations of composite fermions across multiple λ levels, Nature Physics 5, 403 (2009)

2009
[67]

F. D. M. Haldane, Fractional quantization of the hall ef - fect: A hierarchy of incompressible quantum ﬂuid states, Physical Review Letters 51, 605 (1983)

1983
[68]

J. K. Jain, Composite fermions (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

2007
[69]

F. D. M. Haldane and E. H. Rezayi, Finite-size studies of the incompressible state of the frac- tionally quantized hall eﬀect and its excitations, Physical review letters 54, 237 (1985)

1985
[70]

P. A. M. Dirac, Quantised singu- larities in the electromagnetic ﬁeld, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Contai ning Pap
[71]

T. T. Wu and C. N. Yang, Dirac monopole without strings: monopole harmonics, Nuclear Physics B 107, 365 (1976)

1976
[72]

T. T. Wu and C. N. Yang, Some properties of monopole harmonics, Physical Review D 16, 1018 (1977)

1977
[73]

Jain and R

J. Jain and R. Kamilla, Composite fermions in the hilbert space of the lowest electronic landau level, International Journal of Modern Physics B 11, 2621 (1997)

1997
[74]

Wu and J

Y.-H. Wu and J. K. Jain, Quantum hall eﬀect of two-component bosons at fractional and integral ﬁllings, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 87, 245123
[75]

Jain and R

J. Jain and R. Kamilla, Quantitative study of large composite-fermion systems, Physical Review B 55, R4895 (1997)

1997
[76]

Majumder and S

D. Majumder and S. S. Mandal, Neutral collec- tive modes in spin-polarized fractional quantum hall states at ﬁlling factors 1/3, 2/5, 3/7, and 4/9, 10 Physical Review B 90, 155310 (2014)

2014
[77]

D. Das, M. Indra, and D. Majumder, Neutral collective excitation in fractional quantum hall eﬀect at jain series, Solid State Communications 260, 19 (2017)

2017
[78]

Viefers, Quantum hall physics in rotating bose–einstein condensates, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 20, 123202 (2008)

S. Viefers, Quantum hall physics in rotating bose–einstein condensates, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 20, 123202 (2008)

2008
[79]

S. S. Mandal and J. K. Jain, Theoretical search for the nested quantum hall eﬀect of composite fermions, Physical Review B 66, 155302 (2002)

2002
[80]

Pinczuk, Resonant inelastic light scattering from quantum hall systems, Perspectives in Quantum Hall Eﬀects: Novel Quantum Liquids in Low-Dimensional

A. Pinczuk, Resonant inelastic light scattering from quantum hall systems, Perspectives in Quantum Hall Eﬀects: Novel Quantum Liquids in Low-Dimensional

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

The bra-ket notation denotes the multidimensional integrations here, which are numerically computed by the Monte Carlo method

will be the interac- tion potential ( V ) only as described earlier. The bra-ket notation denotes the multidimensional integrations here, which are numerically computed by the Monte Carlo method. We have considered three diﬀerent ﬁlling frac- tions ν = 1 /2, 1/4, 1/6 to compute the energy spectra (∆) for both the spin-conserving and spin-reversed ex- cita...

work page

[2] [2]

M. H. Anderson, J. R. Ensher, M. R. Matthews, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, Observation of bose-einstein condensation in a dilute atomic vapor, science 269, 198 (1995)

work page 1995

[3] [3]

Y. Tang, W. Kao, K.-Y. Li, and B. L. Lev, Tuning the dipole-dipole interaction in a quantum gas with a rotating magnetic ﬁeld, Physical review letters 120, 230401 (2018)

work page 2018

[4] [4]

K. B. Davis, M.-O. Mewes, M. R. Andrews, N. J. van Druten, D. S. Durfee, D. Kurn, and W. Ketterle, Bose-einstein condensation in a gas of sodium atoms, Physical review letters 75, 3969 (1995)

work page 1995

[5] [5]

M. Lu, N. Q. Burdick, S. H. Youn, and B. L. Lev, Strongly dipolar bose-einstein condensate of dysprosium, Physical review letters 107, 190401 (2011)

work page 2011

[6] [6]

Trautmann, P

A. Trautmann, P. Ilzhöfer, G. Durastante, C. Politi, M. Sohmen, M. Mark, and F. Ferlaino, Dipolar quantum mixtures of erbium and dysprosium atoms, Physical Review Letters 121, 213601 (2018)

work page 2018

[7] [7]

The composite Fermion transformation maintains the overall wave-function symmetry of the system as Φ and J both are antisymmetric in nature

we have used the spherical Spinor variables ( u, v) which are given by u = cos(θ/2)e−iφ/2 and v = sin(θ/2)eiφ/2 (8) where, θ and φ vary between 0 to π and 0 to 2π, respectively. The composite Fermion transformation maintains the overall wave-function symmetry of the system as Φ and J both are antisymmetric in nature. B. Wave-function for spin-conserving e...

work page

[8] [8]

Regnault and T

N. Regnault and T. Jolicoeur, Quantum hall fractions in rotating bose-einstein condensates, Physical review letters 91, 030402 (2003)

work page 2003