Minimizing the Gauss map area of surfaces in $\mathbb{S}^3$

Gerard Orriols; Tristan Rivi\`ere

Minimizing the Gauss map area of surfaces in $\mathbb{S}^3$

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For every immersion of a closed oriented genus-g surface into S^3, the area of its Gauss map is at least 4π(1+g), with equality exactly for round spheres in genus zero.

desk verdict Solid, significant paper: sharp lower bound and bubbling theorem for Gauss map area in S^3, with embeddedness assumption explicit and load-bearing. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.05141 v1 pith:KEBEN2SO submitted 2025-06-05 math.DG

Gerard Orriols , Tristan Rivière This is my paper

classification math.DG MSC 53C4249Q1553A05

keywords GaussmapareatotalabsolutecurvatureGrassmannianof2-planestightandtautimmersionsbubblingintegralcurrentsWillmoreconjecturegeometricvariationalproblems

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves the optimal lower bound for the area of the Gauss map of a closed oriented surface immersed in the 3-sphere. The area of the map $G_\varphi\colon\Sigma\to\operatorname{Gr}^+_2(\mathbb{R}^4)$, $x\mapsto\varphi(x)\wedge\nu(x)$, satisfies $\operatorname{Area}(G_\varphi)\ge 4\pi(1+g)$ for genus $g$, and the constant cannot be improved for any genus. Equality is attained only when $g=0$ and the surface is a round sphere. For $g>0$, the paper shows that minimizing sequences of embedded surfaces degenerate in a structured way: they converge to a round sphere, while the Gauss-map area splits into one positive sphere-bubble and $g$ negative point-bubbles, each of area $4\pi$. This compactness picture is the ingredient needed to make the Gauss-map area a viable min-max functional in the direction of the Willmore conjecture.

What carries the argument

Three mechanisms carry the proof. First, the pointwise bound $\operatorname{AG}(\varphi)\ge T(\varphi)/\pi$ links Gauss-map area to the Chern\--Lashof total absolute curvature $T(\varphi)$, whose lower bound $2\pi^2(2g+2)$ gives Theorem 1.1; equality in the link occurs only at umbilic points. Second, a quantitative angle decomposition: writing $\cot\tilde\theta_i=\kappa_i$ produces intervals $(\theta_1,\theta_2)$ and the split $\Sigma_0=\{\hat\theta\le\pi/2\}$, $\Sigma_\pi=\{\hat\theta>\pi/2\}$; the estimates $\mu(\Sigma_\pi)\ge 4\pi-C\delta$ and $\int_{\Sigma_\pi}(\pi-\hat\theta)\,d\mu\le C\sqrt{\delta}$ force almost-minimizers to lie near a round sphere. Third, for embedded surfaces, the normal cycle $(\varphi_j,\nu_j)_\#\llbracket\Sigma\rrbracket$ in the Stiefel manifold $V_2(\mathbb{R}^4)$ is decomposed as $N_j^+-N_j^-$ using parallel surfaces of geodesically convex sets; the mass bounds $\mathrm{M}(N_j^+)\le 4\pi+o(1)$, $\mathrm{M}(N_j^-)\le 4\pi g+o(1)$ combine with the K\"ahler calibration of $\mathbb{S}^2_+\times\mathbb{S}^2_-$ and the Lagrangian condition to force the limiting cycles to be graphs of rotations.

What would settle it

A single smooth immersed genus-1 torus in $\mathbb{S}^3$ with Gauss-map area $\le 8\pi$ would refute the optimal lower bound of Theorem 1.1; conversely, computing the pushed-forward Gauss cycles of the non-embedded tori described in Remark 1.4 and finding a doubled-hemisphere limit would confirm the embeddedness caveat rather than refute the theorem.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the functional $\operatorname{AG}(\varphi)=\int_\Sigma \sqrt{(1+\kappa_1^2)(1+\kappa_2^2)}\,\mathrm{dvol}_\Sigma$ on immersions $\varphi:\Sigma\to\mathbb{S}^3$ obeys $\operatorname{AG}(\varphi)\ge 4\pi(1+g)$, with equality if and only if $g=0$ and $\varphi$ parametrizes a round sphere. For $g>0$, equality is impossible, but the bound is sharp: there are embedded genus-$g$ surfaces whose Gauss-map area approaches $4\pi(1+g)$ while the area measure converges to $\gamma_{\mathbb{S}}+4\pi\delta_{p_1}+\dots+4\pi\delta_{p_g}$ on a round sphere $\mathbb{S}$. The main compactness theorem asserts that every minimizing sequence of embeddings has this same bubbling structure: the surfaces converge in Hausdorff distance to a possibly degenerate round sphere, and the integral cycles carried by the Gauss maps converge to $[\Gamma_{p_0}]-[\Gamma_{p_1}]-\dots-[\Gamma_{p_g}]$, where each $\Gamma_p$ is the Gauss map of the round sphere centered at $p$, equivalently the graph of a rotation in $\mathbb{S}^2\times\mathbb{S}^2$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the surfaces in the minimizing sequence are embedded and not merely immersed: the proof uses the two components of the complement of each embedded surface to select the convex sets $K_j$ and to identify the limiting sphere's homology class. Without this assumption, the limiting Gauss map can instead be a hemispherical varifold of multiplicity two, so the exact cycle-splitting conclusion of Theorem 1.3 can fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For genus zero the inequality is rigid: an immersion of a sphere with Gauss-map area exactly 4π must parametrize a round sphere.
For every genus g>0 the infimum 4π(1+g) is optimal but never attained, so the functional has no minimizers in these classes.
Minimizing sequences of embedded genus-g surfaces converge in Hausdorff distance to a possibly degenerate round sphere, and the Gauss-map area measures converge to γ_S + 4πδ_{p1} + ⋯ + 4πδ_{pg}.
The integral cycles carried by the Gauss maps converge to [Γ_{p0}] − [Γ_{p1}] − ⋯ − [Γ_{pg}], exhibiting exactly one positive and g negative sphere-like bubbles.
The proof yields a qualitative ε-δ stability statement: small excess over 4π(1+g) forces the surface into a small neighborhood of a round sphere, and for embeddings forces the cycle splitting above.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural quantitative next step is to decide whether the exponent 1/3 in the estimate ∫_{Σ_π}(|θ_− − θ_1| + |θ_2 − θ_+|) dμ ≤ Cδ^{1/3} is optimal; improving it would give a convergence rate for the Hausdorff collapse to the round sphere.
If the embeddedness condition could be relaxed to arbitrary immersions, the open problem in [32] would be fully resolved and the min-max route to the Willmore conjecture would be complete; the paper shows the obstruction via the doubled-hemisphere example.
The same calibration-and-splitting strategy suggests that among Lagrangian immersions of genus g into Gr_2^+(R^4) exactly regular homotopic to Gauss maps, the infimum 4π(1+g) may still be the right value, a question the paper leaves open.
One could test whether the bubbling picture persists for almost-minimizers of the total absolute curvature functional T in S^3, where equality is possible for tori and the expected limit objects would be Dupin cyclides.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Read it. The main theorem is the real thing: for every immersion of a closed oriented genus-g surface into S^3, Area(G_φ) ≥ 4π(1+g), sharp for every genus, equality only for round spheres when g=0. The compactness statement for minimizing sequences—Hausdorff convergence to a round sphere, splitting of the Gauss map cycles into g+1 spheres, concentration of area measures at g points—is new and answers Rivière's Open Problem IV.1 up to the embeddedness assumption.

What the paper does well: the proof is honest and largely self-contained. The lower bound is a clean Chern–Lashof plus Cauchy–Schwarz argument, and the stability estimates in Section 5 are the heart: control on the focal interval length, the measure split into positive and negative parts, and the calibration argument that identifies the limiting cycles as graphs of rotations. These steps look correct. The authors state the embeddedness hypothesis plainly, and Remark 1.4 gives a genuine counterexample (the figure-8 torus) showing that without it the precise conclusion can fail. Self-citations to [25], [31], [32] are legitimate—they point to the problem and the Lagrangian framework, not to a fitted constant. No circularity.

Soft spots, in proportion: the exact cycle splitting is proved only for embeddings. That is a real limitation but not a hidden flaw; the paper says so. The step where local holomorphic graphs are obtained from calibrated limiting cycles could be written more explicitly, but the Lagrangian condition consistently forces the differentials into U(1), so the reasoning checks out. Minor technical issues: (1.12) should list Γ_p1,...,Γ_pg instead of repeating Γ_pg, and Proposition 5.15's condition θ_-(x)>R/2 is impossible as written and should read |θ_-(x)|>R/2, though Lemma 5.14 makes the intended inequality unambiguous. Lemma 4.2's handle construction is sketched and gives C^{1,1} surfaces rather than smooth ones, but that is a standard smoothing situation and not load-bearing.

Who this is for: geometric analysts working on tight and taut surfaces, the Willmore conjecture, min-max methods, and sharp stability inequalities. It deserves a serious referee; I would send it out. My own verdict is accept after minor revisions, and I would cite it.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the area of the Gauss map G_φ: Σ → Gr_2^+(R^4) of an immersed oriented closed surface Σ of genus g in S^3. The main results are: (i) a sharp lower bound Area(G_φ) ≥ 4π(1+g), with equality iff g=0 and φ parametrizes a round sphere (Theorem 1.1); (ii) for every g, existence of minimizing sequences of embedded surfaces whose Gauss map area measures converge to a round sphere plus g point measures (Theorem 1.2); and (iii) a compactness/stability theorem for any minimizing sequence of embeddings: after passing to a subsequence the surfaces converge in Hausdorff distance to a (possibly degenerate) round sphere, and the Gauss map currents split into one positive bubble and g negative bubbles, with explicit convergence of measures and varifolds (Theorem 1.3). The proof of the lower bound uses a comparison between the Gauss map area and the Chern–Lashof total absolute curvature, with equality analysis; the compactness theorem is built on quantitative estimates involving the intervals θ_1, θ_2, θ_±, a decomposition of the normal cycle into positive and negative parts via convex sets, and a calibration argument showing the limit cycles are graphs of rotations.

Significance. If the results are correct, this is a substantial contribution to the geometry of the Gauss map and to the stability theory of tight and taut surfaces. The lower bound is parameter-free and sharp, the equality case is rigid, and the compactness theorem gives a complete qualitative description of minimizing sequences in the embedded case, including a positive answer to a case of Open Problem IV.1 from [32] (modulo the embeddedness assumption, which is shown to be necessary in Remark 1.4). The paper is largely self-contained, building on classical Chern–Lashof theory, calibration, and integral currents; the estimates in Section 5 are explicit and checkable. The construction of almost-minimizers in Section 4 exhibits the expected bubbling behavior and confirms optimality for every genus. The connection to the Willmore conjecture program is clearly articulated.

minor comments (4)

[Theorem 1.3, Eq. (1.12)] The displayed convergence for the Gauss cycles in (1.12) lists [Γ_pg] twice; it should be [Γ_p0] − [Γ_p1] − ··· − [Γ_pg], as in the equivalent formulation (1.13). This is a typographical error.
[Proposition 5.15] In the definition of Σ^+_j the condition θ_-(x) > R/2 is impossible because θ_-(x) < 0 by construction; the estimate in Lemma 5.14 and the surrounding text indicate the intended condition is |θ_-(x)| > R/2 (i.e., θ_-(x) < −R/2).
[Lemma 4.3] The proof states that 'the only thing to check is the nonnegativity of the Gauss curvature', but the lemma statement and its application in Lemma 4.2 require nonpositive Gauss curvature. This sign inconsistency should be corrected.
[Section 5.4, Proof of Theorem 5.1] The step from the calibrated holomorphic cycles to global rotations is terse: the Lagrangian condition gives det_R D u_k = 1, and since D u_k is complex-linear this yields D u_k ∈ U(1); explaining this explicitly would help the reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reduction: the lower bound and compactness theorems are derived from external classical inequalities and standard geometric measure theory, not from their own conclusions.

full rationale

I walked the paper's derivation chain. Theorem 1.1 is obtained by combining the exact identity AG(phi) = integral sqrt((1+kappa1^2)(1+kappa2^2)) dvol with the Chern-Lashof lower bound T(phi) >= 2 pi^2 (2g+2), quoted as Theorem 3.3 from Chern-Lashof [7,8]; the equality case is a Cauchy-Schwarz equality forcing kappa1=kappa2, i.e. an umbilic round sphere. No fitted constant enters and the target lower bound is not assumed. Theorem 1.2 is an explicit construction using tight surfaces in R3 and handles, so it does not derive its conclusion from itself. The compactness theorem 5.1/1.3 uses the stability estimates (5.6)-(5.7), the explicit embeddedness of phi_j to build convex sets K_j in Proposition 5.15, and standard calibration and compactness arguments (holomorphic cycles, Federer-Fleming, Riviere-Tian); the splitting N_j^+ - N_j^- is defined from the constructed K_j, not from the desired limiting decomposition. The paper contains self-citations to [25], [31], and [32], but these are contextual, used to cite classical facts, or used to reference an open problem; they do not carry the proof of Theorems 1.1 or 1.3. The only defects I noticed are typographical (e.g. (1.12) repeats Gamma_{pg}, and Proposition 5.15's condition should read |theta_-(x)| > R/2), which do not make any step circular. Therefore the paper is self-contained with respect to its main claims and has no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data; all constants C(g) are generic. The proof rests on classical external theorems (Chern-Lashof, calibration, integral currents, normal cycles) plus the paper's new estimates. No new particles, forces, or invented entities are postulated.

assumptions (5)

standard math Chern-Lashof inequality T ≥ 2π^2(2g+2) for the total absolute curvature of an immersion into S^3 (Theorem 3.3, refs [7,8]).
Used in the proof of Theorem 1.1 to convert AG ≥ T/π into AG ≥ 4π(1+g), and in Lemma 5.7 to estimate the mass of the positive region Σ_π.
standard math Kähler calibration of Gr^+_2(R4) ≅ S^2_+ × S^2_-: integral cycles in class (k,k) have mass at least 4πk, with equality only for holomorphic cycles.
Used in Theorem 5.1 to identify the weak limits T+ and T- as graphs of rotations. This is a standard geometric measure theory fact, not proved in the paper.
standard math Federer-Fleming compactness for integral currents and Rivière-Tian regularity of 1-1 integral currents.
Used to pass to subsequential weak limits of the cycles N_j± and to represent the limiting holomorphic currents away from finitely many singularities.
standard math Existence and basic properties of normal cycles for geodesically convex sets in S^3 with C^{1,1} boundary, including parallel transformations.
Used in Proposition 5.15 and Lemma 5.16 to construct the positive cycle N+ from convex parallel sets and to transfer measure identities to the Gauss map.
standard math Gauss-Bonnet theorem in its classical form and for C^{1,1} boundaries.
Used in Proposition 2.7, Lemma 5.5, Lemma 5.17, and Lemma 5.18 to fix degrees, total curvature, and areas of the limiting spheres.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Minimizing the Gauss map area of surfaces in $\mathbb{S}^3$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KEBEN2SO

@misc{pith2026250605141,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Minimizing the Gauss map area of surfaces in $\mathbbS^3$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KEBEN2SO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.05141}
}

abstract

We establish the lower bound of $4\pi(1+g)$ for the area of the Gauss map of any immersion of a closed oriented surface of genus $g$ into $\mathbb{S}^3$, taking values in the Grassmannian of $2$-planes in $\mathbb{R}^4$. This lower bound is proved to be optimal for any genus $g \in \mathbb{N}$ but attained only when $g = 0$. For $g \neq 0$ we describe the behavior of any minimizing sequence of embeddings: we prove that, modulo extraction of a subsequence, the surfaces converge in the Hausdorff distance to a round sphere $S$, and the integral cycles carried by the Gauss maps split into $g+1$ spheres, each of area $4\pi$; one of them corresponds to the cycle carried by the Gauss map of $S$, while the other $g$ arise from the concentration of negative Gauss curvature at $g$ points of $S$. The results of this paper are used by the second author to define a nontrivial homological 4-dimensional min-max scheme for the area of Gauss maps of immersions into $\mathbb{S}^3$ in relation to the Willmore conjecture.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

[25]

Variational problems for Lagrangian and Legendrian subman ifolds

Gerard Orriols. Variational problems for Lagrangian and Legendrian subman ifolds. PhD Thesis, ETH Z¨ urich. 2025, pp. vi+150

work page 2025
[31]

Conformally Invariant Variational Problems

Tristan Rivi` ere. Conformally Invariant Variational Problems . 2012. url: https://people.math. ethz.ch/~riviere/lecture-notes

work page 2012
[32]

Minmax Hierarchies, Minimal Fibrations and a PDE based Proof of the Willmore Conjecture

Tristan Rivi` ere. Minmax Hierarchies, Minimal Fibrations and a PDE based Proo f of the Willmore Conjecture. 2023. arXiv: 2007.05467 [math.DG] . url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.05467

work page Pith review arXiv 2023
[1]

The spherical two-piece property and tig ht surfaces in spheres

Thomas F. Banchoﬀ. “The spherical two-piece property and tig ht surfaces in spheres”. J. Diﬀer- ential Geometry 4 (1970), pp. 193–205

work page 1970
[2]

A quantitative description of skyrmions in ultrathin ferromagnetic ﬁlms and rigidity of degree ±1 harmonic maps from R2 to S2

Anne Bernand-Mantel, Cyrill B. Muratov, and Theresa M. Simon. “A quantitative description of skyrmions in ultrathin ferromagnetic ﬁlms and rigidity of degree ±1 harmonic maps from R2 to S2”. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 239.1 (2021), pp. 219–299

work page 2021
[3]

T. E. Cecil and P. J. Ryan. Tight and taut immersions of manifolds . Vol. 107. Research Notes in Mathematics. Pitman (Advanced Publishing Program), Boston, MA, 1985, pp. vi+336

work page 1985
[4]

Cecil and Shiing-shen Chern, eds

Thomas E. Cecil and Shiing-shen Chern, eds. Tight and taut submanifolds . Vol. 32. Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications. Papers in memory of Nico laas H. Kuiper, Papers from the Workshop on Diﬀerential Systems, Submanifolds and Control T heory held in Berkeley, CA, March 1–4, 1994. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997, p p. xviii+349

work page 1994
[5]

On the number of top-cyc les of a tight surface in 3-space

Thomas E. Cecil and Patrick J. Ryan. “On the number of top-cyc les of a tight surface in 3-space”. J. London Math. Soc. (2) 30.2 (1984), pp. 335–341

work page 1984

Show all 35 references

[6]

Minimal surfaces in an Euclidean space of N dimensions

Shiing-shen Chern. “Minimal surfaces in an Euclidean space of N dimensions”. Diﬀerential and Combinatorial Topology (A Symposium in Honor of Marston Mor se). Princeton Univ. Press, Prince- ton, NJ, 1965, pp. 187–198

1965
[7]

On the total curvat ure of immersed manifolds

Shiing-shen Chern and Richard K. Lashof. “On the total curvat ure of immersed manifolds”. Amer. J. Math. 79 (1957), pp. 306–318. 25

1957
[8]

On the total curvat ure of immersed manifolds. II

Shiing-shen Chern and Richard K. Lashof. “On the total curvat ure of immersed manifolds. II”. Michigan Math. J. 5 (1958), pp. 5–12

1958
[9]

Optimal rigidity estimates for ne arly umbilical surfaces

Camillo De Lellis and Stefan M¨ uller. “Optimal rigidity estimates for ne arly umbilical surfaces”. J. Diﬀerential Geom. 69.1 (2005), pp. 75–110

2005
[10]

Sharp stability inequalities for the Plat eau problem

G. De Philippis and F. Maggi. “Sharp stability inequalities for the Plat eau problem”. J. Diﬀerential Geom. 96.3 (2014), pp. 399–456

2014
[11]

Lagrangian isotopy of tori in S2 ×S2 and CP 2

Georgios Dimitroglou Rizell, Elizabeth Goodman, and Alexander Ivr ii. “Lagrangian isotopy of tori in S2 ×S2 and CP 2”. Geom. Funct. Anal. 26.5 (2016), pp. 1297–1358

2016
[12]

Curvature measures

Herbert Federer. “Curvature measures”. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 93 (1959), pp. 418–491

1959
[13]

¨Uber Kr¨ ummung und Windung geschlossener Raumkurven

Werner Fenchel. “ ¨Uber Kr¨ ummung und Windung geschlossener Raumkurven”. Math. Ann. 101.1 (1929), pp. 238–252

1929
[14]

A mass transportation appro ach to quantitative isoperimetric inequalities

A. Figalli, F. Maggi, and A. Pratelli. “A mass transportation appro ach to quantitative isoperimetric inequalities”. Invent. Math. 182.1 (2010), pp. 167–211

2010
[15]

The sharp quantitative isop erimetric inequality

N. Fusco, F. Maggi, and A. Pratelli. “The sharp quantitative isop erimetric inequality”. Ann. of Math. (2) 168.3 (2008), pp. 941–980

2008
[16]

Lagrangian spheres in S2 ×S2

R. Hind. “Lagrangian spheres in S2 ×S2”. Geom. Funct. Anal. 14.2 (2004), pp. 303–318

2004
[17]

Quantitative minimality of strictly stable extremal sub- manifolds in a ﬂat neighbourhood

Dominik Inauen and Andrea Marchese. “Quantitative minimality of strictly stable extremal sub- manifolds in a ﬂat neighbourhood”. J. Funct. Anal. 275.6 (2018), pp. 1532–1550

2018
[18]

Integral geo metry and Hamiltonian volume min- imizing property of a totally geodesic Lagrangian torus in S2 ×S2

Hiroshi Iriyeh, Hajime Ono, and Takashi Sakai. “Integral geo metry and Hamiltonian volume min- imizing property of a totally geodesic Lagrangian torus in S2 ×S2”. Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci. 79.10 (2003), pp. 167–170

2003
[19]

Minimal total absolute curvature for immer sions

Nicolaas H. Kuiper. “Minimal total absolute curvature for immer sions”. Invent. Math. 10 (1970), pp. 209–238

1970
[20]

Optimal rigidity estim ates for nearly umbilical surfaces in arbitrary codimension

Tobias Lamm and Reiner Michael Sch¨ atzle. “Optimal rigidity estim ates for nearly umbilical surfaces in arbitrary codimension”. Geom. Funct. Anal. 24.6 (2014), pp. 2029–2062

2014
[21]

Rigidity estimate s for isometric and conformal maps from Sn−1 to Rn

Stephan Luckhaus and Konstantinos Zemas. “Rigidity estimate s for isometric and conformal maps from Sn−1 to Rn”. Invent. Math. 230.1 (2022), pp. 375–461

2022
[22]

Min-max theory and the Willmore conjecture

Fernando C. Marques and Andr´ e Neves. “Min-max theory and the Willmore conjecture”. Ann. of Math. (2) 179.2 (2014), pp. 683–782

2014
[23]

J. Milnor. Morse theory . Vol. No. 51. Annals of Mathematics Studies. Based on lecture note s by M. Spivak and R. Wells. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1 963, pp. vi+153
[24]

Generalized curvatures

Jean-Marie Morvan. Generalized curvatures . Vol. 2. Geometry and Computing. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2008, pp. xii+266

2008
[26]

Buckling eigenvalues, Gauss maps and Lagran gian submanifolds

Bennett Palmer. “Buckling eigenvalues, Gauss maps and Lagran gian submanifolds”. Diﬀerential Geom. Appl. 4.4 (1994), pp. 391–403

1994
[27]

Hamiltonian minimality and Hamiltonian stability of G auss maps

Bennett Palmer. “Hamiltonian minimality and Hamiltonian stability of G auss maps”. Diﬀerential Geom. Appl. 7.1 (1997), pp. 51–58

1997
[28]

Curvature properties of taut submanifolds

Ulrich Pinkall. “Curvature properties of taut submanifolds”. Geom. Dedicata 20.1 (1986), pp. 79– 83

1986
[29]

Curvature measures of singular sets

Jan Rataj and Martina Z¨ ahle. Curvature measures of singular sets . Springer Monographs in Math- ematics. Springer, Cham, 2019, pp. xi+256

2019
[30]

Calculus of variations

Filip Rindler. Calculus of variations . Universitext. Springer, Cham, 2018, pp. xii+444

2018
[33]

The singular set of 1-1 integra l currents

Tristan Rivi` ere and Gang Tian. “The singular set of 1-1 integra l currents”. Ann. of Math. (2) 169.3 (2009), pp. 741–794

2009
[34]

Sharp quantitative rigidity results for maps from S2 toS2 of general degree

Melanie Rupﬂin. Sharp quantitative rigidity results for maps from S2 toS2 of general degree. 2023. arXiv: 2305.17045 [math.AP] . url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.17045

2023 arXiv
[35]

Note on embedded surfaces

T. J. Willmore. “Note on embedded surfaces”. An. S ¸ti. Univ. “Al. I. Cuza” Ia¸ si Sect ¸. I a Mat. (N.S.) 11B (1965), pp. 493–496. 26 ETH, R ¨amistrasse 101, 8092 Z ¨urich, Switzerland Email address : gerard.orriols@math.ethz.ch ETH, R ¨amistrasse 101, 8092 Z ¨urich, Switzerl...

1965

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [25]

Variational problems for Lagrangian and Legendrian subman ifolds

Gerard Orriols. Variational problems for Lagrangian and Legendrian subman ifolds. PhD Thesis, ETH Z¨ urich. 2025, pp. vi+150

work page 2025

[2] [31]

Conformally Invariant Variational Problems

Tristan Rivi` ere. Conformally Invariant Variational Problems . 2012. url: https://people.math. ethz.ch/~riviere/lecture-notes

work page 2012

[3] [32]

Minmax Hierarchies, Minimal Fibrations and a PDE based Proof of the Willmore Conjecture

Tristan Rivi` ere. Minmax Hierarchies, Minimal Fibrations and a PDE based Proo f of the Willmore Conjecture. 2023. arXiv: 2007.05467 [math.DG] . url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.05467

work page Pith review arXiv 2023

[4] [1]

The spherical two-piece property and tig ht surfaces in spheres

Thomas F. Banchoﬀ. “The spherical two-piece property and tig ht surfaces in spheres”. J. Diﬀer- ential Geometry 4 (1970), pp. 193–205

work page 1970

[5] [2]

A quantitative description of skyrmions in ultrathin ferromagnetic ﬁlms and rigidity of degree ±1 harmonic maps from R2 to S2

Anne Bernand-Mantel, Cyrill B. Muratov, and Theresa M. Simon. “A quantitative description of skyrmions in ultrathin ferromagnetic ﬁlms and rigidity of degree ±1 harmonic maps from R2 to S2”. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 239.1 (2021), pp. 219–299

work page 2021

[6] [3]

T. E. Cecil and P. J. Ryan. Tight and taut immersions of manifolds . Vol. 107. Research Notes in Mathematics. Pitman (Advanced Publishing Program), Boston, MA, 1985, pp. vi+336

work page 1985

[7] [4]

Cecil and Shiing-shen Chern, eds

Thomas E. Cecil and Shiing-shen Chern, eds. Tight and taut submanifolds . Vol. 32. Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications. Papers in memory of Nico laas H. Kuiper, Papers from the Workshop on Diﬀerential Systems, Submanifolds and Control T heory held in Berkeley, CA, March 1–4, 1994. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997, p p. xviii+349

work page 1994

[8] [5]

On the number of top-cyc les of a tight surface in 3-space

Thomas E. Cecil and Patrick J. Ryan. “On the number of top-cyc les of a tight surface in 3-space”. J. London Math. Soc. (2) 30.2 (1984), pp. 335–341

work page 1984