Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Orthonormal Strichartz estimates for Dunkl-Schr\"{o}dinger equation of initial data with Sobolev regularity

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that Dunkl-Schrödinger orthonormal Strichartz estimates extend from $L^2_\kappa$ data to homogeneous Sobolev data, with the sequence exponent $\alpha$ set by scaling.

desk verdict The main estimates are unsupported: Lemma 3.5 is a false convolution inequality, and the frequency-localized proof collapses on it. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.05493 v2 pith:SLEYAEVC submitted 2025-06-05 math.FA

Guoxia Feng , Shyam Swarup Mondal , Manli Song , Huoxiong Wu This is my paper
classification math.FA MSC 22E2533C4535H2035B40
keywords DunklLaplacianorthonormalStrichartzestimateshomogeneousDunkl-SobolevspaceLorentzspacesSchattenclassesfrequency-localizedrealandcomplexinterpolationSchrödingerequation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the Dunkl–Schrödinger propagator $e^{it\Delta_\kappa}$ obeys orthonormal Strichartz estimates for initial data in the homogeneous Dunkl–Sobolev space $\dot H^s_\kappa(\mathbb R^n)$, not only for $L^2_\kappa$ data. For exponent pairs $(1/p,1/q)$ in the interior of the triangle $OAB$ and for the Sobolev order fixed by the scaling relation $2s=N-(2/q+N/p)$, it asserts the bound $$\Big\|\sum_j \lambda_j |$e^{{it\Delta_\kappa}}$ f_j|^2\Big\|_{L^q_t(\mathbb R,L^p_\kappa(\mathbb R^n))} \lesssim \|\{\lambda_j\}\|_{\ell^\$\alpha$}$$ with $\alpha=\alpha^*(p,q)$ determined by $N/\alpha=1/q+N/p$, for every orthonormal family $\{f_j\}$ in $\dot H^s_\kappa$. A companion statement covers the region $\operatorname{int} OCDA$ with $\alpha

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the Dunkl–Laplacian $\Delta_\kappa$, the reflection-invariant differential-difference operator obtained by replacing coordinate derivatives with Dunkl derivatives, together with its Schrödinger propagator $e^{it\Delta_\kappa}$, a unitary group on the weighted space $L^2_\kappa(\mathbb R^n)$ with weight $h_\kappa(x)=\prod_{\alpha\in R_+}|\langle\alpha,x\rangle|^{2k_\alpha}$. The argument moves through four main mechanisms: a duality principle converting orthonormal Strichartz estimates into Schatten-class bounds for the operator $W e^{it\Delta_\kappa}(e^{it\Delta_\kappa})^* W$; a refined Young-type inequality (Lemma 3.5) for integrals with kernel $\tilde f(||x|-|y||)$; dyadic Littlewood–Paley projections $P_k$ and their frequency-localized estimates (Theorem 1.4); and successive real and complex interpolation, including bilinear interpolation, that assembles the localized bounds into restricted weak-type and then strong-type global estimates (Theorem 1.5).

What would settle it

A decisive check is Lemma 3.5 in a case it cannot handle: on $\mathbb R^2$ with root system $\{\pm e_1\}$ and weight $h_\kappa(y)=|y_1|^{2k}$, take $\tilde f$ a smooth bump near radius 1 and $g(y)=|y_1|$, a non-radial $L^q$ function, and compare $G((a,0))$ with $G((0,a))$ for $a>0$. If these values differ, $G$ is not radial and the lemma's proof fails; because Lemma 5.2 uses Lemma 3.5 to bound $T_j^{(0)}$ and $T_j^{(1)}$, the frequency-localized proof of Theorem 1.4 is then not valid as written, and a numerical test of the target estimate at the exponents predicted by Theorem 1.5 would show whether the theorem itself survives.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the Sobolev restriction $2s=N-(2/q+N/p)$ is compatible with systems of orthonormal Dunkl–Schrödinger waves: the estimate $$\Big\|\sum_j \lambda_j |$e^{{it\Delta_\kappa}}$ f_j|^2\Big\|_{L^q_t(\mathbb R,L^p_\kappa(\mathbb R^n))} \lesssim \|\{\lambda_j\}\|_{\ell^\$\alpha$}$$ holds for $(1/p,1/q)\in \operatorname{int} OAB$ with $\alpha=\alpha^*(p,q)$, and the analogous statement holds in $\operatorname{int} OCDA$ with $\alpha<q$. The proof first establishes frequency-localized estimates for data supported on dyadic annuli, using dispersive decay of the propagator together with a refined Young-type inequality for radial kernels, and then upgrades to global Sobolev data through restricted weak-type interpolation and a chain of real and complex interpolation steps. When $s=0$ the exponent reduces to $\alpha=2p/(p+1)$, matching the known $L^2_\kappa$ orthonormal Strichartz bound; when $\kappa=0$ the Dunkl operator coincides with the Euclidean Laplacian and the statements reduce to the classical Sobolev-regularity orthonormal Strichartz estimates.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is Lemma 3.5's assertion that the Dunkl weight $h_\kappa(x)=\prod_{\alpha\in R_+}|\langle\alpha,x\rangle|^{2k_\alpha}$ is radial, which makes $G(x)=\int \tilde f(||x|-|y||)g(y)h_\kappa(y)dy$ radial and reduces its $L^r$ norm to a one-dimensional weighted norm; for $n\ge 2$ and any nontrivial reflection group this is false, already for $h_\kappa(x)=|x_1|^{2k}$ on $\mathbb R^2$, and Lemma 3.5 feeds the frequency-localized bounds in Lemma 5.2 that support Theorem 1.5.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • When $\kappa=0$ the Dunkl–Laplacian is the Euclidean Laplacian, so Theorem 1.5 reduces to the orthonormal Sobolev-space Strichartz estimates known for the classical Schrödinger equation.
  • Taking only one nonzero coefficient in the orthonormal family recovers the single-function Dunkl–Strichartz estimate in homogeneous Sobolev spaces, including fractional regularity $s$.
  • The exponent $\alpha=\alpha^*(p,q)$ is the one forced by scaling, so the $\ell^\alpha$ dependence is sharp whenever the estimates hold.
  • The frequency-localized estimates of Theorem 1.4 give annulus-localized orthonormal bounds that, through the duality principle, imply Schatten-space bounds for the Dunkl–Schrödinger propagator.
  • The Lorentz-space refinements proved along the way are stronger than the Lebesgue-space statements and are needed to make the interpolation chain work.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If Theorem 1.5 holds, the same interpolation chain should work for any self-adjoint operator whose propagator has the same dispersive decay; the only place the proof uses the specific Dunkl structure is the radial kernel inequality, so replacing that lemma would carry the method to other weighted settings.
  • A plausible endpoint question the paper leaves open is whether the estimate persists on the boundary of $OAB$, where the classical Euclidean cases often require separate arguments.
  • If the Sobolev-regularity estimates are valid, they should give Schatten-space well-posedness for Dunkl analogues of Hartree equations with initial data below $L^2_\kappa$ regularity, following the usual fermionic many-body route.
  • The scaling formula $N/\alpha=1/q+N/p$ pins the sequence exponent, so any strengthening of Theorem 1.5 would have to exploit structure beyond scaling.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops frequency-localized and global orthonormal Strichartz estimates for the Dunkl-Schrödinger propagator with initial data in homogeneous Dunkl-Sobolev spaces, extending results of Frank–Sabin and Bez–Hong–Lee–Nakamura–Sawano to the Dunkl setting. The main results are Theorem 1.4 (frequency-localized estimates for N>2, with remarks for 1≤N≤2) and Theorem 1.5 (global strong-type estimates). The argument combines Lorentz-space refinements of known Strichartz estimates, Schatten-space duality, real and complex interpolation, and a new inequality stated as Lemma 3.5. The paper is organized around these ingredients and includes the relevant preliminaries on Dunkl analysis.

Significance. The target results, if true, would be a meaningful refinement of existing orthonormal Strichartz estimates in the Dunkl setting: they allow Sobolev-regular initial data with the correct scaling relation 2s=N-(2/q+N/p) and cover the region int OAB and int OCDA. The paper contains no fitted parameters and does not assume the desired inequality as an input; it builds on known dispersive estimates and interpolation machinery. The frequency-localized strategy is coherent, and the Lorentz-space refinements in Theorem 4.1 and Theorem 4.2 are natural intermediate steps. However, the central technical lemma on which the frequency-localized argument rests is false, and consequently the claimed main results are not established.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3, Lemma 3.5] Lemma 3.5 is the load-bearing ingredient in the proof of Lemma 5.2, where it is used to bound both T_j^{(0)} and T_j^{(1)}, and its proof is invalid because it asserts that h_κ is radial. The definition in §2.1, h_κ(x)=∏_{α∈R_+}|⟨α,x⟩|^{2κ_α}, is not radial for n≥2 and any nontrivial finite reflection group; for example, the type A_1 root system in R^2 gives h_κ(x)=|x_1|^{2κ}. Consequently the identity (3.9) with a single angular constant C_κ and the reduction of ∥G∥_{L^r_κ} to a one-dimensional weighted norm are unjustified. Since Lemma 5.2 is used directly in the proof of Theorem 1.4 and then in the proof of Theorem 1.5, the frequency-localized and global estimates are unsupported.
  2. [Section 3, Lemma 3.5] Independently of the radiality issue, the asserted inequality is false even in the Euclidean case κ=0. For n=2, p=q=3/2 and r=3, take f_ε(x)=π^{-2/3}ε^{-4/3}1_{|x|≤ε} and g_ε(y)=(2π Rε)^{-2/3}1_{R≤|y|≤R+ε}, both normalized in L^{3/2}. Then G_ε(x)=∫ f_ε(||x|-|y||)g_ε(y)dy is supported in an annulus of radius roughly R and thickness roughly ε, with pointwise size about R^{1/3}ε^{-1}; hence ∥G_ε∥_{L^3(R^2)} is comparable to R^{2/3}ε^{-2/3}, which contradicts the claimed bound by ∥f_ε∥_{L^{3/2}}∥g_ε∥_{L^{3/2}}=1 when R≫ε^{-1}. The same translation-invariance failure already appears in the proof's intermediate identification of the half-line convolution norm with the radial L^p_κ norm, since the weight ρ^{N-1}dρ is not translation-invariant. Lemma 3.5 is therefore not a harmless radiality slip, and the parts of Lemma 5.2 that invoke it must be replaced.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 6, proof of Theorem 6.2] The displayed relation '2s = 2((1−θ)·0+θs1)' should read '2s = θ(2s1)' or equivalently '2s = N−(2/q+N/p)'; as printed, the equality is dimensionally inconsistent.
  2. [Section 6] The heading 'Proof of Remark 1.1, 1.1 and 1.1' and the later use of 'Remark 1.1, 1.1 and 1.1' in the proof of Theorem 6.1 refer to the remarks appended to Theorem 1.4, not to Remark 1.1; these cross-references need correction.
  3. [Section 1, after Notation 1.3] There is a duplicated word in the sentence 'In addition, if if (1/p,1/q) belongs to the region int OAF ...'.
  4. [Section 5, proof of Theorem 1.4] The dyadic decomposition is written as 'P_{j∈R} T_j'; the index set should be Z, as used throughout the subsequent argument.
  5. [Section 2.4] In the line 'As the Dunkl-Schrödinger operator e^{itΔκ} is unitary on L^2(R^n)', the space should be L^2_κ(R^n) with the weighted measure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Sobolev-level Strichartz estimates are derived from prior external endpoint results, scaling, and interpolation, not from the target inequalities themselves.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain of Theorems 1.4 and 1.5, I find no step in which a claimed prediction is equivalent to its input by construction. Theorem 1.4 is built from the elementary pointwise/ℓ1 estimates (5.2) and (5.3), the frequency-localized estimate of Theorem 5.1, and a bilinear complex interpolation argument via Lemma 5.2. Lemma 5.2 itself is proved using the dispersive bounds (2.10) and (2.11), kernel estimates, and real interpolation in the style of Keel–Tao; no quantity is fitted to the data that Theorem 1.4 claims to predict. The global Sobolev-level statement Theorem 1.5 is obtained in Section 6 by rescaling the frequency-localized estimates, applying the restricted weak-type upgrade Proposition 2.4, and then real/complex interpolation, with Theorem 1.2 and Theorem 4.2 serving as endpoint inputs. Theorem 4.2 is proved separately via the Frank–Sabin duality principle and the Hardy–Littlewood–Sobolev inequality in Lorentz spaces, not by assuming the desired Sobolev estimate. The self-citations [11], [23], and [29] are contextual or supply the previously published endpoint result Theorem 1.2; the final Sobolev-regularity claim does not reduce to a self-citation chain. The main weakness of the paper is a correctness issue, not circularity: Lemma 3.5 asserts that the Dunkl weight hκ is radial, which is false for nontrivial root systems when n≥2, and the radial-coordinate Young-type inequality fails even in the Euclidean κ=0 case; this affects Lemma 5.2 and hence Theorem 1.4, but it is a false lemma rather than a circular argument. I therefore record a low score reflecting only minor, non-load-bearing self-citation context.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central proof relies on prior single-function and orthonormal theorems, Frank-Sabin duality, and a new Lemma 3.5; the latter's false radiality assumption is the main unsupported load.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Single-function Dunkl Strichartz estimate (Theorem 1.1 of Mejjaoli) holds for the endpoint range (q,p,N)≠(1,∞,2).
    Invoked to obtain (1.4), Theorem 4.1 and as input for interpolation; accepted from [28] without reproof.
  • domain assumption Orthonormal Dunkl Strichartz estimate for L2κ initial data (Theorem 1.2 of Mondal-Song) holds on (A,F] with α=2p/(p+1).
    Used as an endpoint in Theorem 6.2 and in the final interpolation of Theorem 1.5; cited [29].
  • domain assumption Frank-Sabin duality principle and Schatten complex interpolation (Lemmas 2.2, 2.3) transfer to the Dunkl setting.
    The paper states these with 'appropriate modifications' and does not prove them; used throughout Sections 4-6.
  • domain assumption Dunkl translation Lp boundedness for radial functions and Dunkl Young's inequality (2.7) hold for all relevant κ.
    Used in (2.6), (2.7), (2.11), and in the frequency-localized proof; cited from [18,40].
  • ad hoc to paper The Dunkl weight hκ is radial and G in Lemma 3.5 is radial.
    Explicitly asserted in Lemma 3.5's proof. False for general Coxeter groups, so the lemma and downstream bounds are unproved.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Orthonormal Strichartz estimates for Dunkl-Schr\"{o}dinger equation of initial data with Sobolev regularity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SLEYAEVC

@misc{pith2026250605493,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Orthonormal Strichartz estimates for Dunkl-Schr\"odinger equation of initial data with Sobolev regularity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SLEYAEVC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.05493}
}
abstract

Let $\Delta_\kappa$ be the Dunkl-Laplacian on $\mathbb{R}^n$. The main aim of this paper is to investigate the orthonormal Strichartz estimates for the Schr\"odinger equation with initial data from the homogeneous Dunkl-Sobolev space $\dot{H}_\kappa^s (\mathbb{R}^n)$. Our approach is based on restricted weak-type orthonormal estimates, frequency-localized estimates for the Dunkl-Schr\"odinger propagator $e^{it\Delta_\kappa}$, and a series of successive real and complex interpolation techniques.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.05493 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. N ≥ 2 For 1 ≤ N < 2, see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. 1 ≤ N < 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Strichartz estimates involving orthonormal systems at the critical summability exponent

    math.AP 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Global strong-type orthonormal Strichartz estimates hold at the critical summability exponent alpha=q in the interior of the region OCDA, for n>=2.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [2]

    N. Bez, Y. Hong, S. Lee, S. Nakamura, Y. Sawano, On the Strichartz estimates for or- thonormal systems of initial data with regularity , Adv. Math. 354, 106736 (2019). [2, 3, 6, 13]

    work page 2019

  2. [14]

    R. L. Frank and J. Sabin, Restriction theorems for orthonormal functions, Strichartz in- equalities, and uniform Sobolev estimates , Amer. J. Math. 139(6), 1649-1691 (2017). [2, 5, 13, 18]

    work page 2017

  3. [29]

    S. S. Mondal and M. Song, Orthonormal Strichartz inequalities for the (k, a)-generalized La- guerre operator and Dunkl operator, Israel J. Math. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856- 025-2762-x [2, 3, 7]

    doi:10.1007/s11856- 2025

  4. [1]

    Bennett, R

    C. Bennett, R. Sharpley, Interpolation of Operators, Academic Press, 1988. [16]

    work page 1988

  5. [3]

    N. Bez, S. Lee and S. Nakamura, Strichartz estimates for orthonormal families of initial data and weighted oscillatory integral estimates , Forum Math. Sigma 9, Paper No. e1 (2021). [3]

    work page 2021

  6. [4]

    Bergh, J

    J. Bergh, J. L¨ ofstr¨ om,Interpolation Spaces, An Introduction , Spring-Verlag, New York,

  7. [5]

    Dai and H

    F. Dai and H. Wang, A transference theorem for the Dunkl transform and its applications , J. Funct. Anal. 258(12), 4052-4074 (2010). [10] 28 GUOXIA FENG, SHYAM SW ARUP MONDAL, MANLI SONG, AND HUOXIONG WU

    work page 2010

  8. [6]

    Dai and W

    F. Dai and W. Ye, Local restriction theorem and maximal Bochner-Riesz operators for the Dunkl transforms, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 371, 641–679 (2019). [9]

    work page 2019

Show all 41 references
  1. [7]

    C. F. Dunkl, Differential-difference operators associated to reflection groups , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 311, 167-183 (1989). [8]

    1989

  2. [8]

    C. F. Dunkl, Integral kernels with reflection group invariance, Canad. J. Math. 43, 1213-1227 (1991). [3, 8]

    1991

  3. [9]

    C. F. Dunkl, Hankel transforms associated to finite reflection groups , Contemp. Math. 138, 123-138 (1992). [9]

    1992

  4. [10]

    C. F. Dunkl and Y. Xu, Orthogonal polynomials of several variables (second edition), Cam- bridge University Press, 2014. [3]

    2014

  5. [11]

    G. Feng, S. S. Mondal, M. Song and H. Wu, Orthonormal Strichartz inequalities and their applications on abstract measure spaces , arXiv: 2409.14044 (2024). [3]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [12]

    G. Feng, M. Song, Restriction theorems and Strichartz inequalities for the Laguerre operator involving orthonormal functions , J. Geom. Anal. 34, 287 (2024). [3]

    2024

  7. [13]

    R. L. Frank, M. Lewin, E. H. Lieb and R. Seiringer, Strichartz inequality for orthonormal functions, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 16(7), 1507-1526 (2014). [2]

    2014

  8. [15]

    R. L. Frank and J. Sabin, Spectral cluster bounds for orthonormal systems and oscillatory integral operators in Schatten spaces , Adv. Math. 317, 157-192 (2017). [3]

    2017

  9. [16]

    I. M. Gel’fand, G. E. Shilov, Generalized Functions, vol. I: Properties and Operations , Academic Press, New York (1964). [17]

    1964

  10. [17]

    Ghosh, S

    S. Ghosh, S. S. Mondal and J. Swain, Strichartz inequality for orthonormal functions asso- ciated with special Hermite operator , Forum Math. 36, 655-669 (2024). [3]

    2024

  11. [18]

    D. V. Gorbachev, V. I. Ivanov, and S. Y. Tikhonov, Positive Lp-bounded Dunkl-type gener- alized translation operator and its applications , Constr. Approx. 49, 555–605 (2019). [10]

    2019

  12. [19]

    Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, 2nd ed., Grad

    L. Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, 2nd ed., Grad. Texts in Math. 249, Springer, New York, 2008. [14]

    2008

  13. [20]

    Hoshiya, Orthonormal Strichartz estimate for dispersive equations with potentials , J

    A. Hoshiya, Orthonormal Strichartz estimate for dispersive equations with potentials , J. Funct. Anal. 286 (11), Paper No. 110425, 63 pp (2024). [3]

    2024

  14. [21]

    J. E. Humphreys, Reflection Groups and Coxeter Groups, Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math. 29, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990. [7]

    1990

  15. [22]

    M. F. E. de Jeu, The Dunkl transform , Invent. Math. 113, 147–162 (1993). [9]

    1993

  16. [23]

    S. P. Jitendra Kumar, B. Pradeep, S. S. Mondal, and H. Mejjaoli, Restriction theorem for Fourier-Dunkl transform II: Paraboloid, sphere, and hyperboloid surfaces , J. Geom. Anal. 34, Paper No. 74, 36pp (2024). [2, 3]

    2024

  17. [24]

    J. Jiu, Z. Li, The dual of the Hardy space associated with the Dunkl operators , Adv. Math. 412, 108810 (2023). [7] ORTHONORMAL STRICHARTZ ESTIMATES FOR DUNKL-SCHR ¨ODINGER EQUATION WITH SOBOLEV REGULARITY 29

    2023

  18. [25]

    Keel and T

    M. Keel and T. Tao, Endpoints Strichartz estimates , Amer. J. Math. 120, 955-980 (1998). [1, 3, 6, 16, 23]

    1998

  19. [26]

    E. H. Lieb and W. E. Thrring, Bound on kinetic energy of fermions which proves stability of matter , Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 687-689 (1975). [3]

    1975

  20. [27]

    E. H. Lieb and W. E. Thrring, Inequalities for the moments of the eigenvalues of the Schr¨ odinger hamiltonian and their relation to Sobolev inequalities , Studies in Mathemat- ical Physics, Princeton university press, page 269-303, Princeton (1976). [3]

    1976

  21. [28]

    Mejjaoli, Dispersion phenomena in Dunkl-Schr¨ odinger equation and applications, Serdica Math

    H. Mejjaoli, Dispersion phenomena in Dunkl-Schr¨ odinger equation and applications, Serdica Math. J. 35(1), 25–60 (2009). [3, 7]

    2009

  22. [30]

    Nakamura, The orthonormal Strichartz inequality on Torus , Trans

    S. Nakamura, The orthonormal Strichartz inequality on Torus , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 373, 1455-1476 (2020). [3]

    2020

  23. [31]

    O’Neil, Convolution operators and L(p, q) spaces, Duke Math

    R. O’Neil, Convolution operators and L(p, q) spaces, Duke Math. J. 30, 129–142 (1963). [15]

    1963

  24. [32]

    N. N. Nguyen, Fermionic semiclassical Lp estimates, J. Funct. Anal. 286, Paper No. 110196 (2024). [3]

    2024

  25. [33]

    T. Ren, A. Zhang, Improved spectral cluster bounds for orthonormal systems , Forum Math. 36, no. 5, 1383–1392 (2024). [3]

    2024

  26. [34]

    R¨ osler,Positivity of Dunkl’s intertwining operator , Duke Math

    R. R¨ osler,Positivity of Dunkl’s intertwining operator , Duke Math. J. 98, 445-463 (1999). [7, 8, 10]

    1999

  27. [35]

    Ben Sa ¨ ıd, T

    S. Ben Sa ¨ ıd, T. Kobayashi, and B. Orsted,Laguerre semigroup and Dunkl operators , Com- pos. Math. 148, 1265-1336 (2012). [7]

    2012

  28. [36]

    Ben Sa ¨ ıd, A

    S. Ben Sa ¨ ıd, A. K. Nandakumaran, and P. K. Ratnakumar,Schr¨ odinger propagator and the Dunkl Laplacian, hal-00578446v1, 2011. [7]

    2011

  29. [37]

    Lewin and J

    M. Lewin and J. Sabin, The Hartree equation for infinitely many particles I. Wellposedness theory, Comm. Math. Phys. 334(1), 117–170 (2015). [3]

    2015

  30. [38]

    E. M. Stein, G. Weiss, Introduction to Fourier Analysis on Euclidean Spaces , Princeton Mathematical Series, vol. 32, Princeton University Press, 1993. [11]

    1993

  31. [39]

    R. S. Strichartz, Restrictions of Fourier transforms to quadratic surfaces and decay of so- lutions of wave equations , Duke Math. J. 44, 705-714 (1977). [1]

    1977

  32. [40]

    Thangavelu and Y

    S. Thangavelu and Y. Xu, Convolution operator and maximal function for Dunkl transform , J. Anal. Math. 97, 25-55 (2005). [10]

    2005

  33. [41]

    X. Wang, A. Zhang, C. Zhang, Strichartz estimates for orthonormal systems on compact manifolds, arxiv.org/abs/2503.08504 (2025). [3] School of Mathematical Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China Email address : gxfeng@mail.nwpu.edu.cn 30 GUOXIA FENG, SHYAM SW ARUP M...

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.