Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 37 references

SVD: Spatial Video Dataset

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper introduces SVD, a public dataset of 310 MV-HEVC spatial video clips with per-frame stereo features for codec, QoE, and depth research.

desk verdict SVD fills a real gap but the manuscript's own numbers don't add up and the artifact isn't verifiable as written; worth reviewing once fixed. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.06037 v1 pith:3AAIUH5H submitted 2025-06-06 cs.MM

M. H. Izadimehr , Milad Ghanbari , Guodong Chen , Wei Zhou , Xiaoshuai Hao , Mallesham Dasari , Christian Timmerer , Hadi Amirpour This is my paper
classification cs.MM
keywords spatialvideostereoscopicMV-HEVCAppleVisionProiPhoneinter-viewSSIMdatasetqualityofexperience
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces SVD, a public dataset of consumer-captured spatial (stereoscopic) videos: 300 five-second clips, 150 from an iPhone Pro and 150 from an Apple Vision Pro, plus 10 longer videos, all encoded in MV-HEVC. Each clip ships with per-frame low-level features covering spatial and temporal complexity, colorfulness, luminance, dense disparity maps, and inter-view SSIM, so researchers can characterize content without reprocessing raw video. The authors argue that this fills a gap left by existing stereoscopic datasets, which are often synthetic, automotive, or captured with professional rigs rather than the consumer spatial-video pipeline people actually use. They also report that, in their recordings, the AVP videos show stronger left-right feature correlations and higher inter-view SSIM than the iPhone videos, attributing the gap to the iPhone's 'hero eye' asymmetric processing. A sympathetic reader cares because the dataset provides an open, ready-made testbed for codec benchmarking, quality-of-experience studies, depth-based vision, and adaptive streaming on the spatial-video format now built into consumer devices.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the dataset itself, organized as paired left-right MV-HEVC streams (the multiview extension of HEVC stores each eye as a separate layer inside a single file) recorded on consumer devices. Around it, the paper builds a per-frame feature pipeline: spatial information and DCT-domain spatial complexity, temporal information and DCT-domain temporal complexity, colorfulness, luminance statistics, dense disparity maps from semi-global block matching, and inter-view SSIM. That feature set lets the dataset characterize content quantitatively and supports the paper's observation that inter-view consistency differs systematically between the two capture devices.

What would settle it

Fetch the public URL and count the video files per device; if the download does not match the claimed 310 sequences, or if recomputing mean inter-view SSIM over the released frames shows iPhone clips at least as consistent as AVP clips, the paper's claims are falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that SVD is a public dataset covering the complete consumer spatial-video pipeline: capture on Apple's iPhone Pro and Apple Vision Pro, MV-HEVC encoding, and stereoscopic playback-oriented content. The dataset contains 310 MV-HEVC sequences (300 five-second clips split evenly between the two devices, plus 10 longer clips) and provides per-frame features for both left and right views, including spatial information and spatial complexity, temporal information and temporal complexity, colorfulness, luminance mean and variance, dense disparity maps from semi-global block matching, and inter-view SSIM. The paper further claims a measurable quality pattern: AVP recordings show higher inter-view feature correlation and higher SSIM than iPhone Pro recordings, with the iPhone's 'hero eye' cropping-and-alignment pipeline proposed as the cause. If correct, this makes SVD a benchmark for stereoscopic codecs, quality metrics, 2D-to-3D conversion, and streaming, while also quantifying an asymmetry in how two flagship consumer devices produce depth signals.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim collapses if the advertised link does not actually serve the dataset: all counts, feature files, and intact left-right pairs must be present and usable exactly as described.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Researchers can benchmark stereo codecs (MVC, MV-HEVC, and x265's MV-HEVC support) on content that matches consumer capture, including rate-distortion and inter-view consistency comparisons.
  • The short clips plus per-frame features give a ready testbed for training and evaluating monoscopic-to-stereoscopic conversion and view synthesis.
  • The diversity in spatial complexity, motion, luminance, and disparity supports controlled subjective and objective stereoscopic video quality assessment, including head-mounted-display viewing.
  • The longer sequences enable streaming-oriented experiments such as per-title bitrate ladders, content-aware encoding, and quality-of-experience studies under bitrate variation.
  • The measured AVP-versus-iPhone difference in inter-view SSIM gives future work a concrete target: content-adaptive correction of the iPhone's hero-eye asymmetry.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: if the dataset is as complete as described, it could serve as a common benchmark for evaluating consumer spatial-video capture quality itself, not just codecs, because it pairs two devices with different baseline separations and processing pipelines.
  • Editorial extension: the reported inter-view SSIM gap suggests a testable follow-up: a stereo-rectification or quality-correction module that brings iPhone spatial video closer to AVP consistency could be validated directly on this dataset's SSIM distributions.
  • Editorial extension: because the dataset ships dense disparity maps alongside MV-HEVC streams, it could be reused for depth estimation or novel-view synthesis on content that is neither synthetic nor automotive, which existing stereoscopic benchmarks do not cover.
  • Editorial extension: a future release with encoded variants or bitrate ladders would directly serve streaming comparisons; the current release's raw features already make such ladders straightforward to compute.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces SVD (Spatial Video Dataset), a public collection of stereoscopic MV-HEVC videos captured with an iPhone Pro and an Apple Vision Pro (AVP). It claims 300 short 5-second clips (150 per device) plus longer sequences, along with per-frame low-level features including spatial and temporal complexity, colorfulness, luminance, disparity, and inter-view SSIM. The authors report that AVP videos show higher inter-view consistency than iPhone videos and discuss applications in codec evaluation, streaming, QoE, and depth-based vision. The dataset URL is provided.

Significance. If the dataset and its feature files are exactly as described, SVD addresses a genuine gap: there are few publicly available spatial-video datasets from consumer devices, and the combination of MV-HEVC content with per-frame low-level features would be useful for codec evaluation, adaptive streaming, and quality assessment. The paper's main strength is the artifact itself, and the per-frame feature layer is a valuable addition. However, the contribution is currently weakened by an internal inconsistency in dataset counts and by insufficient documentation of feature-computation parameters, both of which must be fixed before the dataset can be used with confidence.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Section 3, first paragraph] The dataset composition is stated inconsistently. The abstract says '300 five-second video sequences' plus '10 longer videos' (310 total); Section 3 first states 'contains 310 stereoscopic video sequences' but then specifies '150 short video clips of 5 seconds each, along with 10 longer sequences per device', which implies (150 + 10) × 2 = 320 sequences. Section 1 is also ambiguous ('10 long-form sequences captured with both'). This is not cosmetic: every per-device breakdown and downstream feature statistic depends on the exact counts. Please reconcile the numbers and provide a precise per-device table (counts by device and duration), and ensure the released archive matches those numbers.
  2. [Section 3.2.6 and Figure 3] The conclusion that 'the AVP exhibits stronger correlations between views across most features, as well as higher SSIM scores, suggesting more consistent stereo alignment and better structural similarity' and 'highlights the superior stereo capture quality of the AVP' is not supported by the presented analysis. The comparison does not control for differences in resolution (1920×1080 vs 2200×2200), baseline (19.2 mm vs 63.8 mm), field of view, or the iPhone's 'hero eye' asymmetric processing (cropping and scaling of the Ultra Wide view). No statistical test is reported, and the 'correlation' metric is not defined (Pearson? computed across frames or across videos?). Please add a controlled analysis (e.g., view-consistency metrics that account for scale and cropping, or matched-scene comparisons) or explicitly soften the conclusion to a descriptive statement about the feature values in this dataset.
  3. [Section 3.2.5 and 3.2.6] The disparity maps are computed with 'StereoSGBM ... as implemented in OpenCV', but no parameters (e.g., numDisparities, blockSize, uniqueness ratio, left-right consistency check) or OpenCV version are given. Similarly, the SSIM computation does not specify window size or other settings. Without these details, the released per-frame disparity and SSIM values cannot be reproduced, which undermines the dataset's advertised feature layer. Please document the exact parameter settings and provide the extraction code or a link to it.
  4. [Section 3 (Dataset availability)] The paper lists a URL and states that the dataset is 'publicly released under an open-access license', but it does not provide a license identifier, file manifest, checksums, or versioning. Given the count inconsistencies above, readers cannot verify that the hosted archive actually contains the described videos and feature files. Please add a dataset-availability subsection that specifies the exact directory structure, file naming, file formats, video lengths, total size, and a checksum manifest.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure 2 and Figure 3 captions] The captions contain typos ('A VP Features', 'A VP'); please correct them to 'AVP Features' and 'AVP'.
  2. [Section 3.1 and Table 2] The device is referred to as 'iPhone Pro' in the text and 'iPhone 16 Pro' in the table title; please unify the naming throughout.
  3. [Section 3.2.3] The colorfulness metric is cited to [23] (Haskell et al., Digital Video), but the described formula (mean and standard deviation of RG and YB differences) is the Hasler–Süsstrunk colorfulness metric; please correct the citation.
  4. [Introduction, first paragraph] The phrase 'the termspatialvideo' appears without a space; please fix the typo to 'the term spatial video'.
  5. [Abstract] The phrase 'hardware-accelerated encoding (e.g., HEVC/x265)' is misleading because x265 is a software encoder; please rephrase to 'hardware-accelerated HEVC encoding or software encoders such as x265'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the dataset construction and feature measurements are self-contained; self-citations are methodological and not load-bearing.

full rationale

This is a dataset paper, not a derivation paper. The central contribution is an empirical artifact: 300 short and 10 long stereoscopic MV-HEVC sequences with per-frame low-level features. The paper reports measurements (spatial and temporal complexity, colorfulness, luminance, disparity, inter-view SSIM) and distribution statistics; there is no fitted parameter that is later relabeled as a prediction. The self-citations, including the EVCA framework [22] for spatial/temporal complexity metrics, VCD [19] as a 2D video dataset example, and several streaming/QoE papers from the same group, are used as methodological references or related-work pointers. They do not support the existence, content, or measured properties of the SVD dataset, and no conclusion in the paper is forced by a self-citation chain or by definition. The AVP-vs-iPhone inter-view consistency observation is a direct measurement interpretation, not a derived result that reduces to its inputs. The internal count inconsistency (310 vs. 320 sequences) and the unverified public URL are correctness/verifiability concerns, but they are not circularity. Therefore no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical or mathematical entities, but its released artifacts (disparity maps, feature tables) rest on unspecified SGBM parameters and on assumptions about stereo alignment and the validity of SSIM as a cross-device quality proxy. The dataset's existence itself is an unverified premise.

free parameters (1)
  • StereoSGBM parameters = not reported
    Section 3.2.5 states that dense disparity maps are computed using the StereoSGBM algorithm in OpenCV, but the block size, disparity range, uniqueness ratio, and post-filtering settings are not given. These parameters determine the released disparity maps and cannot be reproduced exactly without them.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Decoded left and right views from the MV-HEVC files are geometrically aligned well enough that off-the-shelf StereoSGBM produces meaningful disparity maps.
    Section 3.2.5 computes dense disparity with StereoSGBM on every frame. No calibration verification, rectification check, or accuracy evaluation is reported for either device, so the disparity maps rest on an unstated alignment assumption.
  • domain assumption Inter-view SSIM is a valid comparative measure of stereo capture quality across devices with different baselines and resolutions.
    Section 3.2.6 and Fig. 3 compare AVP and iPhone SSIM to conclude the AVP has 'superior stereo capture quality'. The two devices differ in baseline (19.2 mm vs 63.8 mm) and resolution (1920x1080 vs 2200x2200), which affects disparity and SSIM independently of capture quality. No normalization or statistical test is applied.
  • ad hoc to paper The dataset files at the public URL contain the videos and feature tables described, with the stated counts and metadata.
    The paper's central contribution is the dataset, but its availability and integrity are asserted only via a link. The internal contradictions in video counts (abstract vs Section 1 vs Section 3) make this assumption load-bearing and unverified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of SVD: Spatial Video Dataset." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3AAIUH5H

@misc{pith2026250606037,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: SVD: Spatial Video Dataset},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3AAIUH5H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.06037}
}
read the original abstract

Stereoscopic video has long been the subject of research due to its capacity to deliver immersive three-dimensional content across a wide range of applications, from virtual and augmented reality to advanced human-computer interaction. The dual-view format inherently provides binocular disparity cues that enhance depth perception and realism, making it indispensable for fields such as telepresence, 3D mapping, and robotic vision. Until recently, however, end-to-end pipelines for capturing, encoding, and viewing high-quality 3D video were neither widely accessible nor optimized for consumer-grade devices. Today's smartphones, such as the iPhone Pro, and modern Head-Mounted Displays (HMDs), like the Apple Vision Pro (AVP), offer built-in support for stereoscopic video capture, hardware-accelerated encoding, and seamless playback on devices like the Apple Vision Pro and Meta Quest 3, requiring minimal user intervention. Apple refers to this streamlined workflow as spatial video. Making the full stereoscopic video process available to everyone has made new applications possible. Despite these advances, there remains a notable absence of publicly available datasets that include the complete spatial video pipeline. In this paper, we introduce SVD, a spatial video dataset comprising 300 five-second video sequences, 150 captured using an iPhone Pro and 150 with an AVP. Additionally, 10 longer videos with a minimum duration of 2 minutes have been recorded. The SVD dataset is publicly released under an open-access license to facilitate research in codec performance evaluation, subjective and objective quality of experience (QoE) assessment, depth-based computer vision, stereoscopic video streaming, and other emerging 3D applications such as neural rendering and volumetric capture. Link to the dataset: https://cd-athena.github.io/SVD/

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.06037 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Grid of the first frames from 35 randomly selected spatial videos recorded using the iPhone Pro. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of feature distributions from AVP and iPhone datasets. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Correlation of low-level features and average SSIM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A Tutorial on Immersive Video Delivery: From Omnidirectional Video to Holography,

    J. Van Der Hooft, H. Amirpour, M. T. Vega, Y. Sanchez, R. Schatz, T. Schierl, and C. Timmerer, “A Tutorial on Immersive Video Delivery: From Omnidirectional Video to Holography, ”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 1336–1375, 2023

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Virtual Reality,

    I. Wohlgenannt, A. Simons, and S. Stieglitz, “Virtual Reality, ”Business & Informa- tion Systems Engineering, vol. 62, pp. 455–461, Oct. 2020

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    State of the art of virtual reality technology,

    C. Anthes, R. J. García-Hernández, M. Wiedemann, and D. Kranzlmüller, “State of the art of virtual reality technology, ” in2016 IEEE Aerospace Conference, pp. 1–19, Mar. 2016

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Augmented reality technologies, systems and applications,

    J. Carmigniani, B. Furht, M. Anisetti, P. Ceravolo, E. Damiani, and M. Ivkovic, “Augmented reality technologies, systems and applications, ”Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 51, pp. 341–377, Jan. 2011

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    What is Mixed Reality?,

    M. Speicher, B. D. Hall, and M. Nebeling, “What is Mixed Reality?, ” inProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’19, (New York, NY, USA), pp. 1–15, Association for Computing Machinery, May 2019

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Integrating Head Mounted Displays into Live Broadcasting Workflows: Implications and Possibilities from an Industry Perspective,

    B. Dunphy, G. Young, G. Dinan, and N. Murray, “Integrating Head Mounted Displays into Live Broadcasting Workflows: Implications and Possibilities from an Industry Perspective, ” inProceedings of the 2024 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences Workshops, (Stockholm Sweden), pp. 131–136, ACM, June 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    A First Look at Immersive Telepresence on Apple Vision Pro,

    R. Cheng, N. Wu, M. Varvello, E. Chai, S. Chen, and B. Han, “A First Look at Immersive Telepresence on Apple Vision Pro, ” inProceedings of the 2024 ACM on Internet Measurement Conference, (Madrid Spain), pp. 555–562, ACM, Nov. 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Are we ready for autonomous driving? The KITTI vision benchmark suite,

    A. Geiger, P. Lenz, and R. Urtasun, “Are we ready for autonomous driving? The KITTI vision benchmark suite, ” in2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3354–3361, June 2012. ISSN: 1063-6919

    work page 2012

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    Object scene flow for autonomous vehicles,

    M. Menze and A. Geiger, “Object scene flow for autonomous vehicles, ” in2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 3061–3070, June 2015. ISSN: 1063-6919

    2015

  2. [10]

    A Large Dataset to Train Convolutional Networks for Disparity, Optical Flow, and Scene Flow Estimation,

    N. Mayer, E. Ilg, P. Häusser, P. Fischer, D. Cremers, A. Dosovitskiy, and T. Brox, “A Large Dataset to Train Convolutional Networks for Disparity, Optical Flow, and Scene Flow Estimation, ” pp. 4040–4048, IEEE Computer Society, June 2016. ISSN: 1063-6919

    2016

  3. [11]

    A Naturalistic Open Source Movie for Optical Flow Evaluation,

    D. J. Butler, J. Wulff, G. B. Stanley, and M. J. Black, “A Naturalistic Open Source Movie for Optical Flow Evaluation, ” inComputer Vision – ECCV 2012(A. Fitzgib- bon, S. Lazebnik, P. Perona, Y. Sato, and C. Schmid, eds.), (Berlin, Heidelberg), pp. 611–625, Springer, 2012

    2012

  4. [12]

    RMIT3DV: Pre- announcement of a creative commons uncompressed HD 3D video database,

    E. Cheng, P. Burton, J. Burton, A. Joseski, and I. Burnett, “RMIT3DV: Pre- announcement of a creative commons uncompressed HD 3D video database, ” in 2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience, pp. 212– 217, July 2012

    2012

  5. [13]

    A comprehensive database and subjective evaluation methodology for quality of experience in stereoscopic video,

    L. Goldmann, F. D. Simone, and T. Ebrahimi, “A comprehensive database and subjective evaluation methodology for quality of experience in stereoscopic video, ” inThree-Dimensional Image Processing (3DIP) and Applications, vol. 7526, pp. 242–252, SPIE, Feb. 2010

    2010

  6. [14]

    A Video Database for the Development of Stereo-3D Post-Production Algorithms,

    D. Corrigan, F. Pitié, V. Morris, A. Rankin, M. Linnane, G. Kearney, M. Gorzel, M. O’Dea, C. Lee, and A. Kokaram, “A Video Database for the Development of Stereo-3D Post-Production Algorithms, ” in2010 Conference on Visual Media Production, pp. 64–73, Nov. 2010

    2010

  7. [15]

    NAMA3DS1-COSPAD1: Subjective video quality assessment database on coding conditions introducing freely available high quality 3D stereoscopic sequences,

    M. Urvoy, M. Barkowsky, R. Cousseau, Y. Koudota, V. Ricorde, P. Le Callet, J. Gutiérrez, and N. García, “NAMA3DS1-COSPAD1: Subjective video quality assessment database on coding conditions introducing freely available high quality 3D stereoscopic sequences, ” in2012 Fourth Int...

    2012

  8. [16]

    A New Dataset and Transformer for Stereoscopic Video Super-Resolution,

    H. Imani, M. B. Islam, and L.-K. Wong, “A New Dataset and Transformer for Stereoscopic Video Super-Resolution, ” in2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), pp. 705–714, June 2022. ISSN: 2160-7516

    2022

  9. [17]

    YouTube-8M: A Large-Scale Video Classification Benchmark,

    S. Abu-El-Haija, N. Kothari, J. Lee, P. Natsev, G. Toderici, B. Varadarajan, and S. Vi- jayanarasimhan, “YouTube-8M: A Large-Scale Video Classification Benchmark, ” Sept. 2016. arXiv:1609.08675 [cs]

    2016 arXiv

  10. [18]

    YouTube UGC Dataset for Video Compres- sion Research,

    Y. Wang, S. Inguva, and B. Adsumilli, “YouTube UGC Dataset for Video Compres- sion Research, ” in2019 IEEE 21st International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP), pp. 1–5, Sept. 2019. ISSN: 2473-3628

    2019

  11. [19]

    VCD: Video Complexity Dataset,

    H. Amirpour, V. V. Menon, S. Afzal, M. Ghanbari, and C. Timmerer, “VCD: Video Complexity Dataset, ” inProceedings of the 13th ACM Multimedia Systems Confer- ence, (Athlone Ireland), pp. 234–239, ACM, June 2022

    2022

  12. [20]

    A novel stereo camera system by a biprism,

    D. Lee and I. Kweon, “A novel stereo camera system by a biprism, ”IEEE Transac- tions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 16, pp. 528–541, Oct. 2000

    2000

  13. [21]

    A multicamera setup for generating stereo panoramic video,

    S. Tzavidas and A. Katsaggelos, “A multicamera setup for generating stereo panoramic video, ”IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 7, pp. 880–890, Oct. 2005

    2005

  14. [22]

    EVCA: Enhanced Video Complexity Analyzer,

    H. Amirpour, M. Ghasempour, L. Qu, W. Hamidouche, and C. Timmerer, “EVCA: Enhanced Video Complexity Analyzer, ” inACM MMSys 2024, MMSys ’24, pp. 285– 291, Apr. 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    B. G. Haskell, A. Puri, and A. N. Netravali,Digital Video. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2002

    2002

  16. [24]

    Stereo Processing by Semiglobal Matching and Mutual Infor- mation,

    H. Hirschmuller, “Stereo Processing by Semiglobal Matching and Mutual Infor- mation, ”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 30, pp. 328–341, Feb. 2008. Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)

    2008

  17. [25]

    Image Quality Assessment: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity,

    Z. Wang, A. Bovik, H. Sheikh, and E. Simoncelli, “Image Quality Assessment: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity, ”IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 13, pp. 600–612, Apr. 2004. Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Image Processing

    2004

  18. [26]

    Overview of the Stereo and Multiview Video Coding Extensions of the H.264/MPEG-4 AVC Standard,

    A. Vetro, T. Wiegand, and G. J. Sullivan, “Overview of the Stereo and Multiview Video Coding Extensions of the H.264/MPEG-4 AVC Standard, ”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 99, pp. 626–642, Apr. 2011

    2011

  19. [27]

    Overview of the Multiview and 3D Extensions of High Efficiency Video Coding,

    G. Tech, Y. Chen, K. Muller, J.-R. Ohm, A. Vetro, and Y.-K. Wang, “Overview of the Multiview and 3D Extensions of High Efficiency Video Coding, ”IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 26, pp. 35–49, Jan. 2016

    2016

  20. [28]

    SpatialMe: Stereo Video Conversion Using Depth-Warping and Blend-Inpainting,

    J. Zhang, Q. Jia, Y. Liu, W. Zhang, W. Wei, and X. Tian, “SpatialMe: Stereo Video Conversion Using Depth-Warping and Blend-Inpainting, ” 2024. Version Number: 1

    2024

  21. [29]

    Depth Anything: Un- leashing the Power of Large-Scale Unlabeled Data,

    L. Yang, B. Kang, Z. Huang, X. Xu, J. Feng, and H. Zhao, “Depth Anything: Un- leashing the Power of Large-Scale Unlabeled Data, ” in2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 10371–10381, June 2024. ISSN: 2575-7075

    2024

  22. [30]

    Per- ceptual Visual Quality Assessment: Principles, Methods, and Future Directions,

    W. Zhou, H. Amirpour, C. Timmerer, G. Zhai, P. L. Callet, and A. C. Bovik, “Per- ceptual Visual Quality Assessment: Principles, Methods, and Future Directions, ”

  23. [31]

    3D-HEVC visual quality as- sessment: Database and bitstream model,

    Wei Zhou, Ning Liao, Zhibo Chen, and Weiping Li, “3D-HEVC visual quality as- sessment: Database and bitstream model, ” in2016 Eighth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), (Lisbon, Portugal), pp. 1–6, IEEE, June 2016

    2016

  24. [32]

    Spatial Video Streaming on Apple Vision Pro XR Headset,

    G. Chen, S. Wang, J. Chakareski, D. Koutsonikolas, and M. Dasari, “Spatial Video Streaming on Apple Vision Pro XR Headset, ” inProceedings of the 26th Interna- tional Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, HotMobile ’25, (New York, NY, USA), pp. 115–120, Associ...

    2025

  25. [33]

    HTTP Adaptive Streaming: A Review on Current Advances and Future Challenges,

    C. Timmerer, H. Amirpour, F. Tashtarian, S. Afzal, A. Rizk, M. Zink, and H. Hell- wagner, “HTTP Adaptive Streaming: A Review on Current Advances and Future Challenges, ”ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, p. 3736306, May 2025

    2025

  26. [34]

    OPTE: Online Per- Title Encoding for Live Video Streaming,

    V. V. Menon, H. Amirpour, M. Ghanbari, and C. Timmerer, “OPTE: Online Per- Title Encoding for Live Video Streaming, ” inICASSP 2022, pp. 1865–1869, May

    2022

  27. [35]

    PSTR: Per-Title Encoding Using Spatio-Temporal Resolutions,

    H. Amirpour, C. Timmerer, and M. Ghanbari, “PSTR: Per-Title Encoding Using Spatio-Temporal Resolutions, ” in2021 IEEE International Conference on Multime- dia and Expo (ICME), pp. 1–6, July 2021

    2021

  28. [36]

    DeepStream: Video Streaming En- hancements using Compressed Deep Neural Networks,

    H. Amirpour, M. Ghanbari, and C. Timmerer, “DeepStream: Video Streaming En- hancements using Compressed Deep Neural Networks, ”Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, pp. 1–1, 2022

    2022

  29. [37]

    Convex Hull Prediction Methods for Bitrate Ladder Construction: Design, Evalu- ation, and Comparison,

    A. Telili, W. Hamidouche, H. Amirpour, S. A. Fezza, C. Timmerer, and L. Morin, “Convex Hull Prediction Methods for Bitrate Ladder Construction: Design, Evalu- ation, and Comparison, ”ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communi- cations, and Applications, p. 3723006, Mar. 2025

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.